RESEARCH EVALUATION FORM

Instruction: Please rate the paper using the following criteria. In the rating scale, 5 is the
highest and 1 is the lowest.

Research Tittle:
Design of a Valve Lapping Machine for the Cylinder Head of an ISUZU C – 240 Engine

Author:

Melquisedee L. Canete
Ruffa A. Espanola
Francisco C. Malubay
Kristofer Roy M. Parafina
John Carlo M. Waje

I. Title
The title suggests the direction of the research paper 5 4 3 2 1
The title consists the important variables of the study 5 4 3 2 1
II. Abstract
The abstract provides the executive summary of the study that is 5 4 3 2 1
clear and free from ambiguity
The abstract consists of significant keywords which were essentially 5 4 3 2 1
considered in the conduct of the study
III. Introduction
The introduction provides clear objectives of the study 5 4 3 2 1
It provides comprehensive literature review with majority of the 5 4 3 2 1
sources taken from research journals
It shows the significance and relevance of conducting the study 5 4 3 2 1
It offers to fill the gap that has been created by stating what the 5 4 3 2 1
present study intends to ascertain
It anchors on the appropriate theoretical framework 5 4 3 2 1
IV. Methodology
It uses appropriate research design and procedure 5 4 3 2 1

It uses valid and reliable research instruments 5 4 3 2 1

It employs appropriate statistical measures 5 4 3 2 1
V. Results and Discussion
It provides accurate data analysis and statistical treatment 5 4 3 2 1
It presents clear presentation and interpretation of gathered data 5 4 3 2 1
It goes beyond factual recount of the findings and cites related 5 4 3 2 1
studies as to its congruence or dissimilarity
VI. Conclusions and Direction for Future Use
It signifies the researcher’s most important discovery from the 5 4 3 2 1
results of the study
It expresses specific implications of the results of the study to the 5 4 3 2 1
discipline, practice and future research undertakings
It presents doable recommendations based on the results of the 5 4 3 2 1
study
VII. Citations and References
All sources are properly cited, acknowledged and included in the 5 4 3 2 1
paper
xIt adheres to APA format 5 4 3 2 1
TOTAL * 86

Comments: Please fill out all the requested information. Please be specific with your suggestions/
recommendations per part of the research paper. Attach additional sheet when necessary.

Part of the Paper Strengths Weaknesses/ Suggestions/

Limitations Recommendations
Title and Abstract The strengths For me, it does I suggest for abstract that it
about Title of not have has to be summarized in
this research weaknesses more specific word.
was they use because they use
direct word to the right word
clarify the use of that answering
this research. In what. In abstract
Abstract, they they discuss
give the about why it is
audience a important to di
knowledge this research but
about why and they are not so
what is the use specific.
of this research.
They give a hint
in mind and
solution.

Introduction In introduction, They don’t have We all know that machine

they discuss some specific or engine is design to
about why they word to describe lessen the time consumed
go for this their research. by performing. They need
research. They to established more idea on
use a word from introduction that an
another people audience can easily catch
to support their up.
 idea. They
mention on how
it works.

Methodology They explain They base on the They need more ideas to
and conduct an study and explain the design of valve
experiment to theoretical ideas. lapping machine.
show how the
parts may work.

Results and They gathered Some of the For me, they need explain it
Discussions the data so they explanation are very well even they have
can explain it not qualified their evidence that it
very well. They because it gives performs efficiently than
conducted data an idea that was manual valve lapping. For
on manual valve not include to the results, they have their data
and valve research. for project testing.
lapping machine
to prove the
efficiency and
difference
between the two.

Conclusions and They have their The data may be Even though they have
Direction for data and disregarded their data they need to
Future Use evaluation. because they use explain more directly.
too much word
that leads the
audience
confusion.

References They list all their Spacing It should be double

reference that spacing.
support their
research.
*Explanation of the Rating obtained:

RANGE INTERPRETATION

90-100 Very Good to Excellent Research - The research is considered

very meritorious and is recommended for publication.

80-89 Good Research -The research is most likely to be

recommended for publication subject to minor revisions and
improvement.

70-79 Fair Research - The research cannot be recommended for

publication, needs major revisions and improvement in order to
be reconsidered.

Malubay, Archie S. January 29, 2019

____________________ ___________________ ___________
Student Name Signature Date