0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
24 просмотров2 страницы
This document discusses key concepts in private international law, including:
1. Choice of law, which refers to determining the applicable law to a legal problem.
2. Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, which concerns enforcing laws and judgments from one jurisdiction in another.
3. The distinction between public and private international law. Private international law regulates private interactions across borders and deals with conflicts of laws between two or more states.
This document discusses key concepts in private international law, including:
1. Choice of law, which refers to determining the applicable law to a legal problem.
2. Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, which concerns enforcing laws and judgments from one jurisdiction in another.
3. The distinction between public and private international law. Private international law regulates private interactions across borders and deals with conflicts of laws between two or more states.
This document discusses key concepts in private international law, including:
1. Choice of law, which refers to determining the applicable law to a legal problem.
2. Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, which concerns enforcing laws and judgments from one jurisdiction in another.
3. The distinction between public and private international law. Private international law regulates private interactions across borders and deals with conflicts of laws between two or more states.
the problem International Law 3. Recognition and enforcement of judgments – - Rules and principles of general application concerns enforcement of foreign laws and dealing with the conduct of states and of judgments in another jurisdiction international organizations and with their ** these are important to determine the applicable relations inter se,as well as with some of their theories of law as well as the defenses available. NOTE: relations with persons, whether natural or these phases were separate and distinct with each juridical other BRANCHES OF INTERNAL LAW *** lex loci celebrationis and contractus – not grounds 1. Public international law – governs relationship to question jurisdiction of states and international conflicts *** forum non conveniens – not a defense to choice of 2. Private international law – comprehends laws law regulating private interactions across national frontiers. It deals with conflict of laws among STEPS IN DETERMINING APPLICABLE LAW the laws of two or more states and necessitates 1. Characterization – involves identification of the a determination of which municipal law applies to a case issue. What branch of law was implicated in the problem? DISTINCTION BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE 2. Connecting Factors – Determination of which INTERNATIONAL LAW jurisdiction has the most connection to the case. Look at the nationality of parties, location Public Private of the act of event, etc As to source Based on Based on International domestic or CHOICE OF APPLICABLE LAW conventions, municipal laws. custom, general Constitutions 1. Stipulation – parties may stipulate which law principles of law and statutes will govern their contractual relation. Provided recognized by adopted by that such law be a local law and does not civilized nation individual violate public policy or laws of the forum and judicial countries decisions and EXTRATERITORRIALITY teachings of the most highly - Depends on the legislative intent qualified - Applies Article 15-16, NCC publicists of the various nations In the case of Small v US (Art. 38, ICJ Stat) Source is same Not necessarily The law provides “unlawful for any person.. who for all countries has convicted in any court...for a term..to possess As to subjects International Individuals and any firearm” organizations corporations ISSUE: W/N the unlawful gun possession statute FOREIGN ELEMENT had extraterritorial application such that foreign convictions are covered in its scope. NO - most important component of COL - anything which is not domestic and has a Rationale: Conviction is different among the states. foreign component One may be convicted in a country for a crime - foreigner, foreign corp, an incident happening which is not punishable in other country. Thus, in a foreign country, foreign law chosen by the conviction for the said statute should not be parties understood as one to reach beyond domestic - Without this, the problem is domestic, no COL conviction.
PHASES IN CONFLICT RESOLUTION **when the statute gives no clear indication of an
extraterritorial application, it has none. 1. Jurisdiction – concerns the authority of a court of law to take cognizance of a case FORUM NON CONVENIENS - Forum is not convenient - Ex: chosen forum or the place where the suit is filed has no substantial connection to the parties or to the dispute that it becomes very inconvenient to litigate the suit in the chosen venue - May be interposed by way of motion to dismiss - A court in COL cases, may refuse impositions in its jurisdiction on where it is not most convenient or available forum and the parties are not precluded from seeking remedies elsewhere. - It is discretionary. Court may renounce provided that the vital facts are stablished to determine whether special circumstance requires the court’s desistance
In Puyat v Zabarte, SC enumerates the instances where
a court may desist from exercising jurisdiction:
1. The belief that the matter can be better tried
and decided elsewhere, either because the main aspects of the case transpired in a foreign jurisdiction or the material witnesses have their residence there; 2. The belief that the non-resident plaintiff sought the forum, a practice known as forum shopping, merely to secure procedural advantages to convey or harass the defendant 3. The unwillingness to extend local judicial facilities to non residents or aliens when the docket may already be overcrowded; 4. The inadequacy of the local judicial machinery for effectuating the right sought to be maintained 5. The difficulty of ascertain foreign law
Until Its Delivery Which Must Be Intended To Give Effect To The Instrument To Him. Without The Initial Delivery, There Can Be No Liability On The Instrument."
John William Dunn v. Raymond J. Colleran (Acting Superintendent) The Attorney General of The State of Pennsylvania The District Attorney of Allentown, Pa, 247 F.3d 450, 3rd Cir. (2001)