Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

Chapter III produces the same reactions as the equivalent

EQUILIBRIUM OF FORCE SYSTEMS two concentrated loads.


R1 is found by taking moments about a
3.5 Equilibrium of Parallel Forces point on the line of action of R2, thereby
eliminating R2 from the moment equation.
The conditions for equilibrium of parallel
force systems are determined from the 𝛴𝑀𝐵 = 0 10𝑅1 − 300(8) − 600(3) = 0
conditions necessary to create a zero resultant. 𝑹𝟏 = 𝟒𝟐𝟎 𝒍𝒃 𝒖𝒑
In Art. 2-6 we found that the resultant of parallel
force systems is determined by the equations Similarly, R2 is found by a moment sum about a
point on the action line of R1. The result in
𝑅 = 𝛴𝐹
𝑅 ∙ 𝑑 = 𝛴𝑀 𝛴𝑀𝐴 = 0 10𝑅2 − 600(7) − 300(2) = 0
𝑹𝟏 = 𝟒𝟖𝟎 𝒍𝒃 𝒖𝒑
Since equilibrium means a zero resultant,
we conclude that the independent equations of
equilibrium are 3.6 Equilibrium of Non-Concurrent Force Systems
𝜮𝑭 = 𝟎 In Art. 2-9 it was demonstrated that the
Equation (3-4)
𝜮𝑴 = 𝟎
resultant of a non-concurrent force system could
be determined from the components ΣX, ΣY, and
from which only two unknowns may be
ΣM. The resultant will therefore equal zero, and
determined to hold a parallel force system in
hence equilibrium will kill only when
equilibrium.
𝜮𝑴𝑨 = 𝟎 Equation (3-4a)
𝜮𝑿 = 𝟎 Equation (3-5)
𝜮𝑴𝑩 = 𝟎 𝜮𝒀 = 𝟎
𝜮𝑴 = 𝟎
where the moment centres A and B connect a
line that is not parallel to the forces. The use of 𝜮𝑿 = 𝟎
Eq. (3-4) is usually preferred; the condition XF - 0 𝜮𝑴𝑩 = 𝟎
𝜮𝑴𝑨 = 𝟎
is reserved for a check. This technique is
illustrated in the following problems. 𝜮𝑴𝑨 = 𝟎
𝜮𝑴𝑩 = 𝟎
ILLUSTRATIVE PROBLEMS 𝜮𝑴𝑪 = 𝟎
330 A beam simply supported at the ends,
carries a concentrated load of 300 lb and a
uniformly distributed load weighing 100 lb per The second and third sets of the
linear foot, as shown in Fig 3-15. Determine the equilibrium equations are obtained by replacing
beam reactions. a force summation by an equivalent moment
summation. The moment centers may be
chosen anywhere provided that a line joining
and B is not perpendicular to the X axis, and that
A, B, and to not lie on the same straight line.
(Explain these exceptions hy reviewing Art. 3-4.)
In applying the moment summations it is best
(whenever possible) to select the moment
center at the intersection of two of the unknown,
thereby eliminating these unknowns from the
moment summation. This technique is illustrated
in the following sample problems.

Solution
To begin with, the uniformly distributed
load is equivalent to a resultant of 6 x 100 600 lb
acting at the centre of gravity of the uniform
load diagram This resultant is represented by the
dotted-line vector of 600 lb. The original loading
ILLUSTRATIVE PROBLEMS BH, gives a result which is independent of the
344 The roof truss shown in Fig. 3-17 supported on reaction at B.
rollers at A and hinged B. The wind loads are
𝛴𝑀𝐵 = 0
perpendicular to the inclined members. 80𝐴𝑣 + 240(15) − 320(60) − 600(40) = 0
Determine the components of the reactions at A 𝑨𝒗 = 𝟒𝟗𝟓 𝒍𝒃 𝒖𝒑
and B.

346 Determine the load P required to hold bar


AB in a horizontal position on the smooth incline
shown in Fig. 3-18. Also determine the reactions
at A and B.

Solution
The roller at constrains the reaction to be
vertical. The reaction at B is resolved into its
components BV and BH as shown in Fig. 3-17b.
These three unknown quantities are determined Solution
by applying the equations of equilibrium. To Applying the conditions of equilibrium
simplify computations, the symmetrical deud 𝛴𝑋 = 0, 𝛴𝑋 = 0, 𝛴𝑀𝐴 = 0 provides a solution which
loads have been replaced by their resultant or is quite cumbersome since it leads to a set of
600 lb. The 400-lb resultant of the wind loads bas three simultaneous equations.relating the three
been resolved into its components acting at C. unknowns. A much simpler solution is obtained
Its vertical component is 400 cosθ = 320 lb, and by choosing a moment center which eliminates
its horizontal component is 400 sinθ = 240 lb, two of the unknowns. This center O, lying at the
since from the soul 3-4-5 triangle the functions of intersection of RA and Ra, is easily located
θ are sin θ = 3/5 and cosθ = 4/5. Referring to Fig. geometrically Fig. 3-19a by applying the sine law
3-17b, we now obtain BH from horizontal to triangle AOB:
summation which thereby eliminates AV and BV.

20 𝐴𝑂 𝑂𝐵
= =
𝛴𝑋 = 0 240 − 𝐵𝐻 = 0 sin 105° sin 45° sin 30°
𝑩𝑯 = 𝟐𝟒𝟎 𝒍𝒃 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒍𝒆𝒇𝒕
whence AO = 14.62 ft and OB = 10.34 ft. Then AD
A moment summation about A eliminate = AO cos30° = 12.68 ft and DB = OB cos45° = 7.32
AV and BV and solves directly for BV as follows ft whence the moment arms of P and the 400 lb
load with respect to 0 are 8.68 ft and 5.32 ft as
𝛴𝑀𝐴 = 0
−80𝐵𝑣 + 600(40) + 320(20) + 240(15) = 0 shown in Fig. 3-19.
𝑩𝒗 = 𝟒𝟐𝟓 𝒍𝒃 𝒖𝒑
𝛴𝑀𝑜 = 0 8.68𝑃 − 400(5.32) = 0
Finally AV is determined from a moment 𝑷 = 𝟐𝟒𝟓 𝒍𝒃
summation about B which, by eliminating BV and
This value of P is used to obtain the force
polygon shown in Fig. 3-19b to which the sine
law is applied to give

645 𝑅𝐴 𝑅𝐵
= =
sin 75° sin 45° sin 60°

whence
𝑹𝑨 = 𝟒𝟕𝟐 𝒍𝒃 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑹𝑩 = 𝟓𝟕𝟖 𝒍𝒃

Вам также может понравиться