Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
limestone mine
1
1.INTRODUCTION
• Various blasting parameters affect the blasting result
• Blasting variable mainly two types-
• Uncontrollable: the variables over which we have do
not control,such as
• geology,
• rock characterstics
• local specifications. In mining the basic aim is to
achieve maximum extraction of minerals keeping in
view the environmental economic and lease
constraints.
• Optimization means achieving the maximum mineral
extraction with minimum cost and environmental
hazards. 2
Summary of optimum blast design
1. The explosive energy must be evenly distribute to
achieve uniform fragmentation.
this requires
* proper hole diameter to bench height relationship
* appropriate burden to spacing relationship
* careful implementation of the design
* angle drill in some cases to match existing face
condition
2. Mentain explosive quality control with routine
testing 3
Concept of optimum blasting
• Optimum blasting means that maximum explosive
energy utilized in blast.
• Cost cutting is the main purpose of the optimum
blasting in mining operation.
• So that we have to done optimize the various
controllable blasting variable as per the condition
requirement.
4
2. Purpose of blasting parameter
optimisation in open cast mine
5
3. Blasting parameters
• Hole diameter
• spacing
• Burden
• Hole depth
• Sub-grade drilling
• Stemming & stemming material
• Wooden spacer
• Number of holes in the blast
• Delay timing
• Types of explosives and initiation system
6
Case study of vikram cement limestone
mine
• Staggered drilling pattern are used at vikram
cement mine.
• We studied various blasting parameters which are
using at vikram cement mine and after that we
optimized the blasting parameter for gain better
blasting result.
• Optimization of blasting parameter are mainly
depend upon optimum cost in mining operation.
• So that we studied different blast hole result on the
basis of cost cutting and optimized the blasting
parameters. 7
Blast hole result at vikram cement
mine
• Blast no. 1
• Name of mine: SK-3
• Place of blast: IV E-N
• Blasting parameters:
• Hole diameter (mm): 115
• Depth of hole (m): 06
• Burden (m): 03
• Spacing (m): 06
• Slope of face (degree): 70
• No. of blast hole:9
8
BLAST RESULT OF HOLE 2
• Blast pattern: staggered
• Volume of rock blasted (Te): 2430
• Explosive used:
• Maximum charge per delay: 25.50
• Total explosive used(kg): 280.50
• Initiation system:
• Delay b/w hole to hole or row to row: MSDD
• Stemming (m):
• Length of stemming(m): 03
• Type of stemming material: drill cutting
• Blast result:
• Powder factor (Te/kg) : 08.66
• Fragmentation: Good
9
BLAST RESULT OF HOLE 3
• Name of mine: SK-3
• Place of blast: III E-N
• Blasting parameters:
• Hole diameter (mm): 115
• Depth of hole (m): 8.5
• Burden (m): 03
• Spacing (m): 6.5
• Slope of face (degree): 70
• No. of blast hole: 12 10
.
.
• Blast pattern: staggered
• Volume of rock blasted (Te): 4972.5
• Explosive used:
• a) Maximum charge per delay: 46.75
• b) Total explosive used(kg):561
• Initiation system:
• Delay b/w hole to hole or row to row: MSDD
• Stemming (m):
• Length of stemming(m): 03
• Type of stemming material: drill cutting
• Blast result:
• Powder factor (Te/kg): 8.86
• Fragmentation: Good
11
COMPARE OF HOLE RESULTS
• From comparision between blast 1 and blast 2
We concluded that when we increase S/B ratio then
powder factor increased
In other words explosive energy utilisation also
increased
12
BURDEN
(in practice , burden=1/2 to 1/3 of bench height )
(B=0.024D+0.85m, D = hole dia. In mm)
Burden is defined as the shortest distance to relief at
the time of blast. .
If the burden is too small :- rock is throw at a
considerable distance from the face air-blast levels are
high and the fragmentation will be excessively fine.
If the burdens are too large, several back- break occurs
behind the last row of blast holes .
Excessive burdens cause over confinement of blast
holes, which result in high level of ground vibrations
per weight of explosives being used.
Rock breakage will be extremely coarse and often
causes bottom of toe problem, when burden is kept
large 13
SPACING
(spacing = 1.0 to 1.5 of burden) (S= 0.9B+0.91m)
16
STEMMING MATERIAL
• the most common material used for stemming is drill
cuttings
• Very fine drill cuttings will not hold in the blast hole and
is easily ejected, and produces dust.
• The optimum size of stemming material would be the
material that has an average diameter of
approximately 0.05 times the diameter of the blast
hole.
• If the drill holes are wet to the collar, the use of
crushed stone can result in better fragmentation and
control.
17
SUB-GRADE DRILLING
Sub-grade drilling is approximately =10% of bench height
21
Air decking technique:
in this technique wooden
spacer of 1m to 1.5m is
used.
22
CONCLUSION
• An optimum blast design results reduced ground vibrations,
fly-rock, air overpressure, and better fragmentation which in
turn reduces cost of drilling and blasting and cost of loading
and transportation.
• From the above discussion one can say that, for an optimum
blast design all these factors must be carefully considered
such as, choice of explosives, blast geometry (burden,
spacing, stemming,subgrade drilling, height of the bench and
hole diameter), and initiation system.
• Air decking technique can be used to reduce the consumption
of explosives, ground vibrations and fly rock.
• Air decking technique causes better utilization of explosive
energy.
23
24