Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract
The possibility of measuring thyroid hormones from blood dried on filter paper opened the way to
identifying neonates with congenital hypothyroidism (CH) already in the first days of life. Conse-
quently the early initiation of adequate replacement therapy opened the way to an effective preven-
tion of mental retardation. Timely and complete specimen collection, transport logistics, rapid anal-
ysis and communication of results are key points for the organization of a CH newborn screening
program. Close collaboration between laboratory and treating specialists is necessary to ensure an
adequate treatment and follow-up of babies identified by CH screening programs. Topics for further
investigations remain in the fields of which forms of CH should be identified by screening (only se-
vere or also very mild forms) and on the long-term outcome of the individuals identified by CH
screening. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
In the early 70s, reports were published outlining the effectiveness of early interven-
tion in the treatment of CH [3]. Almost simultaneously reports appeared describing
169.230.243.252 - 12/20/2014 9:44:24 PM
the possibility of measuring thyroid hormones from cord blood [4] or from dried
UCSF Library & CKM
Downloaded by:
blood spots (DBS) [5]. DBS were already being used for collecting specimens for the
NS for phenylketonuria and became immediately the sample material of choice for
CH screening. While the choice of sampling device (the filter paper card for DBS) was
widely accepted, the choice of which thyroid hormone should be measured, i.e. thy-
roid-stimulating hormone (TSH) or thyroxine (T4), was the subject of lengthy argu-
ments. The controversy was at that time focused mainly on specificity compared to
sensitivity. TSH was thought to be the optimal analyte to detect primary hypothyroid-
ism, but there were limitations in the TSH assays in those days, due to a relatively poor
sensitivity. In contrast T4 assays were somewhat more sensitive but lacked the speci-
ficity and resulted in frequent false-positive results particularly in premature babies.
In the early days NS using T4 as the detection marker was common in North America
[6], while TSH was the analyte of choice in Europe [7] and Japan. Today screening for
CH is in operation in most parts of the world and is, together with the screening for
phenylketonuria, the first program that is implemented in the countries just starting
an NS program. With few exceptions TSH is the analyte of choice. Few jurisdictions
are using T4 followed by one or more secondary parameters. Almost everywhere DBS
specimens are generally used. There are exceptions where cord blood specimens are
used instead of DBS (generally very small jurisdictions where births occur at few or
only a single location) [8].
Screening Organization
NS in general is a public health initiative. Therefore most programs are organized and
financed by the respective health departments. In some jurisdictions the participation
to the screening is mandatory and regulated by law, in others is it usually based on
informed dissent. This means that parents have the possibility to opt out from NS.
Screening is unique in that it is not performed as part of the investigation or treatment
of symptomatic individuals, but it is usually offered to all individuals in a community
not known to be at risk of having the condition. This implies that NS is not a diagnos-
tic test and results from it should not be treated as such and therefore be confirmed
before intervention.
NS is usually performed at large laboratory units, processing several thousands of
samples per year. Such a laboratory should ideally be located at an academic facility,
preferably a pediatric one. A minimal size for an NS laboratory has been put in the
range of around 50,000–100,000 samples per year [9]. The rationale behind such a
recommendation is derived from the fact that with less than about 50,000 samples the
screening process may become inefficient. A low sample number can lead to a poor
cost-benefit ratio and provide an insufficient base for statistical analysis. An NS labo-
ratory must also participate in external quality control programs, ideally in an inter-
national one like the Newborn Screening Quality Assurance Program run by the Cen-
169.230.243.252 - 12/20/2014 9:44:24 PM
ters for Disease Control in Atlanta (USA). External quality control programs allow a
UCSF Library & CKM
Screening Strategy
Screening for primary CH has been introduced in most countries worldwide. It is es-
sential that, when starting a new program, a decision is taken on the scope of the
screening, defining the strategy for selecting the test to be used. The goal of screening
for CH should be to detect all forms of primary CH – mild, moderate and severe, with
particular efforts to detect those patients with severe CH, where morbidity is high if
the disease is not detected and treated until several months after birth [10]. The most
sensitive test for detecting primary CH is the assay of TSH. Because iodine deficiency
is one of the most common preventable causes of mental retardation, developmental
disabilities and CH worldwide [11], NS for CH using TSH is also an excellent tool to
monitor the iodine nutritional status in both the neonatal and maternal populations
[12].
Screening Protocols
Screening for CH is effective for the testing of cord blood as well as for blood collect-
ed on filter paper after 24 h of age. The ideal time for sample collection is 48–72 h of
age. Blood is applied directly to the filter paper, and the card is sent immediately after
drying to the laboratory for analysis. The TSH method detects primary CH more ef-
fectively than T4 screening. Analysis of T4 followed by a confirmatory TSH testing has
the drawback of missing cases of mild forms of primary CH. On the other hand, if the
screening program strategy defines it, this approach can detect cases of central CH
(CCH). To be effective the protocols for the detection of CCH are based on one of two
approaches: either a simultaneous determination of T4 and TSH in DBS or a combi-
nation of T4 followed by a secondary TSH testing and in a third step an assay of T4-
binding globulin (TBG). The inclusion of TBG determinations decreases the number
of false-positive results [13].
Because screening for CH is usually embedded in comprehensive NS programs,
169.230.243.252 - 12/20/2014 9:44:24 PM
some compromise has to be made with respect to the timing of sample collection.
UCSF Library & CKM
46 Torresani
Downloaded by:
free-T4 assay, the ideal analyte for the diagnosis of CCH, represents a severe obstacle.
UCSF Library & CKM
Follow-Up
Conclusion
NS for CH is a great success story, and it is very likely that it will continue to be and
to expand worldwide. Very recently new guidelines have been published defining rec-
ommendations for NS [19, 20]. As it has been the experience with all new disorders
added to existing NS programs, the results obtained when a large birth population
undergoes a comprehensive NS for CH will show some new and previously not known
forms of thyroid dysfunction. CH has been shown to be a heterogeneous group of
disorders with a spectrum going from severe, permanent hypothyroidism to mild,
transient hypothyroidism. The significance of thyroid dysfunction characterized by
delayed elevation of serum TSH in preterm infants and acutely ill term infants needs
further evaluation.
Even 40 years after the start of NS for CH, many of the questions concerning the
etiology remain unexplained.
169.230.243.252 - 12/20/2014 9:44:24 PM
UCSF Library & CKM
48 Torresani
Downloaded by:
E-Mail toni@torresani.ch
UCSF Library & CKM