Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 17

English Handouts for Kids

1000+ worksheets and ideas for teaching Learn More


English to young learners.

HOME BLOG RESOURCES ISSUANCES BUHAY GURO P R I N C I PA L S ’ T E S T

Search

ABOUT TEAM STORY C O N TA C T SERVICES ADVERTISE CONTRIBUTE

FA C E B O O K G R O U P ONLINE REVIEW

You are here: Home / Teaching & Education / 2019 DepEd Guidelines for Master Teacher Promotion

2019 DEPED GUIDELINES FOR MASTER


TEACHER PROMOTION
By Mark Anthony Llego / 1 Comment
PayMaya

Buy Discounted Load.


Shop Online Securely. Download PayMaya
now!

INSTALL

 Share  Tweet

DepEd Order No. 29, s. 2002 (Merit Selection Plan of the Department of Education (DepEd))
clearly states that it is the policy of the department to strictly adhere to the principles of
merit, competence, tness, and equality, and that the selection and promotion of employees
shall always be based on their relative quali cations and competence to perform die duties
and responsibilities of the position.

To achieve this objective, various issuances were issued by the Department of Education for
the selection, promotion, and appointment of various levels of position available in the
department. For School Heads, DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2007 was established; while for other
Other-Teaching, Related-Teaching and Non-Teaching positions, DepEd Order No. 66, s. 2007
is being utilized. On the other hand, various references are being used in the selection and
promotion of Master Teacher position, such as MEC Order No. 10, s 1979, MEC Order No. 29,
s 1979, and DECS Order No. 70, s. 1988.

However, most of the said issuances have gray areas that often lead to the different
interpretation of the personnel selection board. Thus, to further achieve the principles of
merit and tness, and the objectivity and uniformity in the assessment and evaluation, these
clari catory guidelines are issued.
GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR MASTER TEACHER
PROMOTION
1. Only those who are actually teaching shall be considered for Master teacher position.
This includes teachers who besides assuming special assignments have regular
teaching loads.

2. Positions for Master Teacher (MT) shall be allotted proportionally on the basis of number
of teachers. The number for the division shall likewise be distributed proportionally
among all districts.

3. An allotment of one (1) MT position per subject area for at least 5-7 teachers should be
the basis in the secondary level (DECS Order No. 70, s. 1998)

4. If there are not enough quali ed teachers in the district to ll the number of MT position
allotted to it, the positions may be lled by a quali ed teacher from other districts;
provided, however, that such teacher shall serve in the district where the MT position
have been allotted.

B A S I C Q U A L I F I C AT I O N S F O R M A S T E R T E A C H E R I
1. Permanent teacher (with Teacher Eligibility)

2. Bachelor’s degree for teacher or Bachelor’s degree with 18 professional units in


Education, and 18 units for MA in Education or its equivalent

3. At least Very Satisfactory (VS) Performance rating for the last three (3) rating periods.

4. At least three (3) years’ experience as Teacher III.

5. Have at least 25 points in leadership, potential and Accomplishments OR has been


demonstration teacher in the District level plus 15 points earned under Leadership,
Potential and Accomplishment.
B A S I C Q U A L I F I C AT I O N F O R M A S T E R T E A C H E R I I
1. Master Teacher I for at least one (1) year.

2. Bachelor’s Degree for teachers or Bachelor’s degree with 18 professional units in


Education; 24 units for Master’s Degree in Education or its equivalent.

3. Very Satisfactory (VS) performance rating as Master Teacher I and/or aggregate VS


rating for the last three (3) rating periods.

4. Have at least 30 points in leadership, Potential and Accomplishment OR has been a


demonstration teacher in the Division Level plus 20 points earned under leadership,
Potential and Accomplishment.

DOCUMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE


C A N D I D AT E
1. CSC Form 212 (Revised 2017)

2. Updated Service Record

3. Transcript of Records (TOR)/ Special Order

4. Performance Rating for the last three rating periods

5. Eligibility Rating

6. Copy of latest approved appointment

7. Documents relevant to the position applied for (MEC Order No. 10, s 1979)

8. Copy of school Program indicating the number of teaching load.

9. Omnibus Certi cation of authenticity and veracity signed by the applicant

C L A R I F I C AT I O N A S T O C R E D I T P O I N T S P E R
CRITERION
A. LEADERSHIP, POTENTIAL AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS

а.. Introduced any of the following which has been adopted or used by the school or district
– 20 points

1. All claims for criterion “a” shall be supported with proofs/evidences for validation where
applicable or to attest to utilization, usefulness or effectiveness.

2. The project proposal shall be supported by evidence of data, data analysis in indicators
and the terminal report shall contain statistical results.

3. The project should have been acknowledged/noted/endorsed by the school


head/education program Supervisor (speci c area) and duly recommended and
approved by the Assistant School Division Superintendent and School Division
Superintendent respectively.

4. Each claim shall be supported with an approved project proposal and a terminal report
after project completion.

5. A certi cation should be given by the School Head/ PSDS on the project utilization,
usefulness or effectiveness and should be corroborated by at least 5 teachers to attest
to the veracity of the claim

6. Any one (1) of the following shall be given 20 points. For group claims, the points shall
be divided equally among the proponents.
1. Curriculum or Instructional Materials
1. Instructional Materials content and development and its effect after
implementation shall require supporting evidences of data, data analysis and/
or statistical validation.

2. Effective Teaching Technique or Strategies


1. This may be a developed intervention program/ technique/ strategies based on
a result of a research nding.

3. Simpli cation of work as in reporting system, records keeping, etc. or procedures in


cost reduction.
1. This maybe a result of a Continuous Improvement (CI) project, a research
ndings or an offshoot of results of comparative studies.

4. A worthwhile Income-Generating Project (IGP) for pupils given recognition by


higher of cials in the division.
1. The IGP shall be for the learners

2. The IGP shall have been sustained or in existence for at least two (2)
consecutive years with a minimum Net Income of P5,000.00

3. The terminal report shall include among others how the income was
generated, how much was generated, where the income were used.

4. Fund-raising activities are not considered as Income-Generating Project.

b. Served as Subject Coordinator or Grade level chairman for at least one (1) year, or as
adviser of school publication and not considered part of the regular teaching load ~ 12
points

1. Claims for coordinatorship/chairmanship/advisorship must be supported with


documentary evidences such as:
1. Of cial designation signed by the school head with term of reference and
annotation or statement that such coordinatorship/chairmanship is outside his/her
regular teaching load

2. Action Plan and Accomplishment Report duly noted/certi ed by the School Head
corroborated by at least 5 teachers.

2. Subject Coordinatorship/Chairmanship must be at least (1) year while advisorship must


be at least two (2) years. Such assignments are not considered as part of teaching load.
A copy of the school program shall be submitted as supporting document.
3. For school paper advisers, there should be at least one (1) publication per year printed
or mimeographed with the name of the candidate indicated as adviser.

c. Served as Chairman of a Special Committee such as Curriculum Study Committee to


prepare Instructional Materials, Committee to prepare School Programs and discharged the
work ef ciently -12 points

1. Curriculum Study Committee may include work on Intervention or Enhancement


Program in the different learning areas, assessment, monitoring and evaluation.

2. Committee to prepare instructional materials may include development of Instructional


Materials, Development of assessment tools, questionnaires and test materials and
quality assurance of instructional materials.

3. Committee to Prepare School Program may include preparation of school/ grade/ year/
Teacher Program of work schedule; and special educational programs created in
support to the different DepEd (CO/RO/DO) program which aim to improve school
performance.

4. Supporting documents shall be:


1. A designation as chairman of the committee

2. A committee Report/Accomplishment Report

3. Copy of project/Committee output/ Program

4. Certi cation by the school head and corroboration of at least 5 teachers of the
school

d. Initiated or headed an educational research duly approved by educational authorities -12


points

1. Research shall either be action research or applied research

2. Research proposals should have been acknowledged/noted/endorsed by the School


Head/School Research Committee (SRC), reviewed by the Schools Division Research
Committee (SDRC) and recommended and approved by the Assistant Schools Division
Superintendent (ASDS) and Schools Division Superintendent (SDS) respectively.

3. A completed research shall have a terminal write-up duly acknowledged and noted by
the SDRC and recommended and approved by the ASDS and SDS respectively.

4. Research topics shall be aligned with research agenda of the CO/RO/SDO, and
according to level of governance.

5. Research conducted and submitted to ful ll requirements for masteral and doctoral
program are not credited as they have credited for the degree program.

6. Credit of 12 points shall be given for individual research. For group claim, points shall be
divided equally among the researchers, except for researches funded under Basic
Education Research Fund (BERF) in which case all members will receive 12 points each.

e. Coordinator of community Project on activity or of a program of another agency or


coordinator of a rural service improvement activity in a community such as feeding,
nutrition, agro-industrial fair, etc. for the least two (2) years -12 points

1. Community Project or Activity may include feeding program in the community health
and wellness and nutrition program, agro-industrial fair, ecological/ environmental
preservation project, Rural Improvement Project, Community Literacy Program among
others.

2. The community project is community-based, not school-based and sponsored by any of


the following: LGU or Barangay, RIC, other government agency or a non-government
organization.

3. Project lead/project organizer shall be given 12 points; while a member of the project or
program as certi ed shall be given 7 points.

4. Supporting documents shall be as follows:


1. A designation as coordinator/project focal person/project proponent/ chairman duly
signed by the head/chair/president of the lead agency or sponsor.

2. Project proposal/write-up and terminal accomplishment report for the project duly
approved by approving authorities, and approved/noted by the ASDS/SDS.

3. A certi cation of commendation/ recognition awarded to the proponent or member


for the project may be included.

f. Organized/ managed as in-service activity or other similar activities at least in the school
level – 12 points

1. The In-Service activity shall mainly be for the improvement of instructions and/ or
professional development of teachers based on development needs.

2. Participants to the INSET are teachers/School Heads/parents/community or a


combination of both/each group.

3. Supporting documents shall include:


1. Training design duly recommended and approved by the ASDS and SDS
respectively.

2. Memorandum for the conduct of the INSET

3. Certi cate of recognition/commendation maybe included.

4. Certi cation of conduct of INSET by the School Head corroborated by 5 teachers

5. Documents shall clearly show that the claimant is the organizer/initiator and/or
program manager of the INSET

g. Credited with Meritorious Achievements -10 points

Such as:

1. Trainer or coach to contestant who received prizes, commendations or any form of


recognition or placed lstZ2nd/3ld etc. in competition
2. Contestant is a bona- de pupil/student of the school.

3. Contest may be academic, socio-cultural, community activity or athletic competition


which is not part of a regular lesson/activity.

4. Claim is supported by certi cate of commendation or recognition where name of


claimant as coach is explicitly stated.

5. Credit points shall be given for each win in any level but not to exceed 10 points.

6. The point for the highest earned place shall be granted if wins are of the same
event/activity.

7. Credit points shall be given as follows:

8. Coordinator of BSP and GSP activities or Scouts which gained awards will be
given points as follows:

h. Authorship – 10 points

1. Authorship of a book, workbook, textbook or module shall be considered when


copyrighted/with ISBN.

2. Authorship of DepEd developed and produced materials shall be included when


supporting documents are provided.
1. Memorandum where name of candidate is included

2. Final copy of the material as published.


3. Sole-authorship of book, workbook, and textbook in module shall be given 10 points.

4. For co-authorship, points shall be divided equally between or among the authors or
writers.

5. Article published shall be granted 1 point per article provided that:


1. Article shall be published in a publication/paper/magazine of wide circulation
(nationwide or region wide) and educational or technical in nature.

B . D E M O N S T R AT I O N T E A C H I N G

1. Claim for demonstration teaching shall be supported with the following:


1. Lesson Plan

2. Certi cate of recognition/commendation as demonstration teacher duly signed by


authorities in the district/ division/region/national as the case may be.

3. It should be corroborated by 3 to 5 teachers present during the demonstration


teaching.

4. Observation tool utilized by observer may be added if there is any.

2. Level of demonstration teaching minimally required is:


1. District level for MT I

2. Division level for MT II

READ:

2019 DepEd Documentary Requirements for Monetary Claims

2019 DepEd Equivalents Record Form (ERF) Requirements

 Share  Tweet
General Reminders on the Preparation...
teacherph.com

Guidelines in the Ranking


of Master Teacher
Applicants
teacherph.com

Teaching Loads of Master


Teachers and Head
Teachers
teacherph.com

DepEd School Calendar for


School Year 2019–2020
teacherph.com

DepEd Guidelines on the


Appointment and
Promotion of Teacher II...
teacherph.com

2019 DepEd Learning


Action Cell
teacherph.com

DepEd New Policy on


Hiring, Promotion to Be
out Soon
teacherph.com

DepEd Sample Class


Program and Teacher’s
Schedule
teacherph.com

RPMS T l f T h
RPMS Tools for Teachers
and Master Teachers
teacherph.com

Differentiated Instruction
Strategies in the
Classroom
teacherph.com

DepEd National Uniforms


for Teaching and Non-
Teaching Personnel for...
teacherph.com

Ad
1. Elementary Level
2. Program Teacher
3. Qualification Teacher

Filed Under: Teaching & Education

ABOUT MARK ANTHONY LLEGO


He is the brain of TeacherPH. Growing up being surrounded by educators, a
passion for education has grown in him. Mark spends his time writing and
spreading online articles about the educational world. He likes emphasizing critical
political issues that involve issued on the educational system of the country. Join Our
Facebook Discussion Group

« Sample Detailed Lesson Plan in TLE Updated DepEd Merit Selection Plan »
for Teaching Demonstration
COMMENTS

WILFREDO D. BARTOLO, JR.


April 26, 2019 at 12:35 pm

Greetings po Sir LLego.


I am Mr. Wilfredo D. Bartolo, Jr. from Cotabato Province. Plain and simple po na kapag may
“gray areas”, misinterpretations or confusions regarding the Master Teacher quali cations,
only the Central Of ce can clarify through a corrigendum, rati cation, or amendment of these
existing order MEC Order No. 10, s 1979, MEC Order No. 29, s 1979, and DECS Order No. 70,
s. 1988. . Hindi po ba? Thank you po!

R E P LY

L E A V E A R E P LY

Your email address will not be published. Required elds are marked *

Comment

Name *
Email *

Website

POST COMMENT

SEARCH

Search

J O I N O U R FA C E B O O K D I S C U S S I O N
GROUP

RECENT POSTS

» Results of the February & March


2019 A&E Test

» 2019 DepEd Standard Policies on


School Opening

» 2019 DepEd Guidelines on Senior


High School Voucher Program

» Paano Umabot sa 3.95 Million ang


Annual Compensation ni Secretary
Briones?
» How Arti cial Intelligence Is
Changing Teaching

» DepEd to Prioritize the


Development of the Last Mile Schools
in 2020-2021

» DepEd Statement on House’s


Passage of the Proposed Mandatory
ROTC in SHS

» Updated Deped Order on Senior


High School Voucher Program

» Sulit nga ba na sugalan ng


gobyerno ang Senior High School
Voucher Program?

» DepEd Quezon City Guidelines on


Classroom Cleaning

F E AT U R E D P O S T S

» Dear Duterte: Here’s What


Teachers Really Want

» An Open Letter to DepEd Secretary


Leonor Magtolis Briones

» Common New Teacher Struggles


(And How to Deal with Them)

» Working Advice and Tips for New


Teachers

» The Unsupportive Co-Teacher:


What is the Root?

» Why Teachers Can’t Have a Normal


Life?

» Top Reasons Why Public School


Teachers Should Get a Well-Deserved
Salary Increase

» Parent-Teacher Relationship and


Cooperation: An Important Factor in
Student’s Quality Learning and Self-
Development

» Students and Parents Bullying


Teachers: A Fast Spreading Disease

RECENT COMMENTS

» Israel R. Maghanoy on DepEd LIS


Data Issues and Frequently Asked
Questions

» maria fe malana on 2019 DepEd


School Improvement Plan (SIP)

» Henry Litan on Granting of Service


Credits to All Personnel Involved in
LIS and EBEIS

» Marygrace Ogena on 2019 DepEd


English Pro ciency Test (EPT)
Reviewer

» Emmanuelle Nato Oteyza on Sulit


nga ba na sugalan ng gobyerno ang
Senior High School Voucher Program?

C O P Y R I G H T ©   2 0 1 9 · T E A C H E R P H . C O M · P R I VA C Y P O L I C Y · T E R M S O F S E R V I C E · C O M M E N T P O L I C Y · C O N TA C T U S

Вам также может понравиться