Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
In any classroom, all students need to feel included and have their needs catered to. In
todays modern learning environments, many students are facing challenges that afflict their ability
to achieve their full potential of learning. As the classroom is not a ‘one size fits all’ type
environment, a proficient teacher is expected to present a lesson that is inclusive to all students and
values their learning (NESA, 2018). UNESCO (2013) recognises inclusive education as “a dynamic
process of change and improvement through which the education system … address the education
needs of all children without discrimination” (p.4); Loreman, Deppeler and Harvey (2011) define
Inclusive Education as an opportunity in the classroom to facilitate and support all students in order
for them to reach their full academic potential. According to the World Bank (2011) one of the most
excluded and marginalised groups of people in the world are children with disabilities; their right to
condition that affects an individuals relationship to their environment and their interaction with
others (Autism Spectrum Australia, 2019); often in a learning environment, students with ASD
present a unique challenge for educators, where many might find it difficult to meet their need
effectively. This paper will discuss methods for including students who require diverse learning
needs, as well as those with ASD. By doing so, the paper will discuss changing views about
inclusion and the current policies and legislations regarding inclusive education in the Australian
educational setting. The paper will also discuss the personal and professional skills required of
teachers, including their attitudes, strategies and methods that can be used in the classroom, and
outcomes.
1
Initially, Australia’s states and territories responsible for their educational system where
rather slow in developing strong and cogent support for inclusive educational methods in schools.
Before large changes were made to policies and the start of the discussion on inclusion, students
with a learning disability were excluded from the mainstream learning environments and singled
out into specialised classrooms filled with other disabled students. The segregation was largely
detrimental to student development, and their future integration in mainstream society (Golden et
al., 2016). In the early 1970s the normalisation principle regarding students with disabilities
commenced, largely due to the Karmel Report (Karmel, 1973) containing recommendations to the
government to support integration, which saw the start of the discussion and conversation for
inclusiveness in schools. By 1981, the International Year of Disabled Persons, every Australian
educational jurisdictions had a policy integrated on including students with disabilities in schools,
and the response to inclusion became a mainstream topic. The Disability Discrimination Act
(Commonwealth Government, 1992) further facilitated the push for schools to support inclusions as
the legislation made it illegal to discriminate against any persons with a disability. The
implementation of the Act saw significant changes in the placement of disabled students in schools
across Australia. The De Lemos Report (1992) determined that of the 62 000 students with
disabilities in Australia in that year, 24% were enrolled in special education classes, 27% were
enrolled in special schools, and 49% were integrated into mainstream schools. However, when the
Salamanca Statement (UNESCO, 1994) was created, a response to the inequality faced by students
with special educational needs, the Australian educational setting began a large process of
systematic and organisational changes towards an inclusive education for all students.
Globally today, people with a learning disorder have the right to an inclusive education, as is
clearly stated in both the Convention on the Rights of Persons with a disability (2006), and the
Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989); both which are ratified in Australia. These documents
2
pushed for further policies and documents for inclusiveness in the Australian educational setting
and recognised the importance of inclusiveness. New implemented documents include the
Australian Professional Standard for Teachers (2018), the National Disability Strategy (2017) , and
the National Quality Framework (2018). Nevertheless, while the educational setting was adapting
and improving the involvement of children with a learning disorder, many educational settings
continue to be denied equal access, and do not uphold the requirements of the conventions (SOWC,
2016.) Over the years, as legislations and policies have become implemented in the educational
setting, the role of the teacher was overlooked. Teachers were not receiving enough support from
authorities and training towards conducting inclusive classroom, and lack of funding further limited
teachers in providing quality lessons for all students, especially those with a learning disorder
(DEEWR, 2012). Further barriers in Australia include the lack of a clear or shared understanding
for the concept ‘inclusive education’. Overall, the changing views and progression towards
inclusion since the 1970s continues to grow and presents considerable positive outcomes for all
students.
behaviour and their social communication (Autism Spectrum Australia, 2019). The classroom is an
environment were socialisation, interaction and communication is constant and relied upon heavily.
This however can affect some individuals with ASD as it may intensify the stress or anxiety they
may experience. The characteristics of people with ASD vary dramatically, however in the
classroom their presence should not be less treasured than the other students. Their inclusion
embraces diversity and provide new strengths into the classroom. These students also develop
stronger neural connection in their brains due to the diverse learning environment (Armstrong,
2010) and they also do better when placed in a setting where more is expected of them (Hattie et al.,
2013). Finally, students with ASD provide a challenge for teachers to provide better methods for
3
teaching all students, and they help promote a climate of giving. The Cooperative Research Centre
for Living with Autism (2016) conducted a study with 934 parents who have children on the
spectrum, and of those children approximately 77% of them were attending a mainstream school.
This percentage continues to rise as the number of people with ASD in Australia continues to grow
(Autism Aspergers Advocacy Australia, 2015). The growing numbers place more challenges on
teachers, who are faced with the task of implementing effective practices, differentiation methods
The New South Wales Education Standards Authority teaching standard 1.6.2 focuses on
ensuring teaching activities are “inclusive of students with a disability” (2016, p.8), and standard
4.1.2 further focuses on the implementation of inclusive interactions for the engagement and
support of all students. Mirroring this is the Australian Professional Standards for Teaching (2018)
that informs teachers of their responsibility to “implement inclusive and positive interactions to
engage and support all students” (4.1). Given that teachers can be presented with classes of students
with diverse learning needs, including those with ASD, it is the teachers responsibility to include
and cater to those needs. It is part of their professionalism and role as a teacher to give the best
possible education for their students. In order for teachers to effectively teach a lesson that is
inclusive to all students especially those with ASD, they must have certain personal and
professional skills and the right attitude for the task. Understanding and conducting research into
students disabilities is a skill that is needed by teachers in order to present classes that
accommodates to students learning needs. For example, providing students with ASD a quiet space
for when class work may become too noisy. Teachers need patience, and will find that repetition
and gentle prompting will allow students to learn new behaviours within the mainstream classroom.
Persistence is also needed; teachers can reward students with ASD to achieve certain outcomes
(Hudry, 2003). Teachers need skills to differentiate and scaffold their lessons to cater to all students
4
based on their needs. An equal learning environment is also created in mainstream classrooms
through methods of adjustments. Observation and assessment is also a critical skill needed by
teachers, as it allows them to track the learning progression and improvements of ASD students
(Hudry, 2003).
In a classroom filled with students with diverse learning needs teachers can adapt the
following, methods, practices and strategies in order to fill the needs of the students and the receive
the best possible outcome. All students should be seated together, and mixed around; there shouldn’t
be an excluded area for students with ASD or other learning disabilities. The teacher should take
responsibility for interacting with all students and engaging with students as they perform their
tasks, and facilitate interaction between all students. Teachers should avoid close physical contact.
They should also consult the student with ASD with what support they specifically need and what
opinion they have as to how it should be implemented. Teachers should also provide specialist
support within the regular class setting when needed. Teachers should also integrate principles of
universal design for students learning. Providing students with an information sheet for their own
organisation regarding future assignments and exam dates is also beneficial. Some students with
ASD have motor skills difficulties that make handwriting difficult, so it would be beneficial to
allow some classwork to be conducted on tablets or laptops. Having a quiet place or time for quiet
during the lesson for students to organise themselves or complete their assignments with teacher
assistance. On a macro scale, schools really need funding in order to assist all students with ASD
and their teachers. Funding is needed for appropriate training, specialist support staff, and
methods and practices listed, students and teachers could see a range of benefits and positive
outcomes. Both disabled and non-disabled students within the mainstream classroom are engaging
5
in a classroom that facilitates positive social development. (Baker-Ericzén et al., 2009). Students
also find a more positive sense of self in an inclusive environment, their social skills increase
positively (Baker-Ericzén et al., 2009). Inclusion minimises bullying, whereas if students with ASD
were to be excluded into their own classes, they are more likely to experience bullying (Rose et al.,
2011). Studies have also found that students with ASD in the regular class setting have scored
higher on achievement tests, and have a closer score to the grade average than those students with
ASD that are not in an inclusive setting (Vakil, et al., 2009). There are also positive outcomes for
students without a disability when they engage with students with a disability. These students grow
in interpersonal skills, are more acceptive of others, become more understanding of human
In conclusion, inclusive education is beneficial to both learners with a learning disability and
those without. It is at the core about the appreciation other peoples differences and uniqueness and
exposes students to diversity. It is a life skill that is important for everyone in the education setting.
This paper has discussed the changing view about inclusion and the implementation of policies and
legislations to address the inclusion of disabled learners. All students have a right to a quality
education, and all their needs should be met. This is successfully provided by the essential personal
and professional skills needed by teachers to meet the needs of their students. Various methods,
strategies and practices can be used to operate a successful inclusive class, which can give way to
6
References
Armstrong, Thomas. (2010) The Power of Neurodiversity: Unleashing the Advantages of Your
Autism Aspergers Advocacy Australia. (2015). Autism Prevalance in Australia 2015. Autism
http://www.a4.org.au/prevalence2015
Autism Spectrum Australia. (2017). What is Autism? Autism Spectrum Australia Retrieved March
Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA) (2018). Guide to the
National%20Quality%20Framework%20Resources%20Kit/2-
DE_03_National%20Quality%20Standard_v8_Secn1.pdf
Discrimination Act, 1992: Fact Sheet. Australian Government. Retrieved March 28, 2019,
Baker-Ericzén, M. J., Mueggenborg, M. G., & Shea, M. M. (2009). Impact of trainings on child
care providers’ attitudes and perceived competence toward inclusion: What factors are
associated with change? . Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28(4), 190–210.
Carroll, A., Forlin, C, & Jobiing, A. (2003). The impact of teacher training in special education on
the attitudes of Australian preservice general educators towards people with disabilities.
national_disability_strategy_2010_2020.pdf
7
DEEWR (2012). Report on the Review of Disability Standards for Education 2005. Canberra:
Commonwealth of Australia.
Farrell, P., Dyson, A., Polat, F., Hutcheson, G., & Gallannaugh, F. (2007). SEN inclusion and pupil
achievement in English schools. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 7(3), 169–
180.
Golden, C. J., Lashley, L. K., Link, J. S., Zusman, M., Pinjala, M., Tirado, C., & Deckard, A.
(2016). Learning Disabilities. New York, [New York] [222 East 46th Street, New York, NY
Hattie, J.A.C., & Anderman, E. (2013). Handbook on Student Achievement. Routledge, New York.
Karmel, P. (1973). Schools in Australia: Report of the interim committee of the Australian
Loreman, T., Deppeler, J. and Harvey, D. (2011). Inclusive education. 2nd ed. Crows Nest, N.S.W.:
NSW Education Standards Authority (2018). Profficient Teacher Support Document. NSW
Government.
Rose, C. A., Monda-Amaya, L. E., & Espelage, D. L. (2011). Bullying Perpetration and
The United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Treaty
Series, 2515, 3.
The United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Treaty Series, 1577, 3.
8
UNESCO. (2013). Promoting inclusive teacher education: Introduction. Bangkok: UNESCO.
UNESCO (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education.
Adopted by the world conference on special needs education: Access and equity. Paris:
UNESCO.
UNICEF (2016). The state of the world’s children: Children with disabilities. New York: United
Vakil, S., Welton, E., O’Connor, B., & Kline, L. S. (2009). Inclusion means everyone! The role of
the early childhood educator when including young children with autism in the classroom
WHO and World Bank. 2011. World Report on Disability. Paris, UNESCO.