Demo profile

Table 1. Age of the Respondents

Demo Profile Min Max Mean SD
Age 18 20 18.73 .52083

Table 2.
Gender Frequency Percentage
Male 7 23.3
Female 22 73.3
LGBT 1 3.3
Total 30 100

Weighted mean
Table 3.

PEOU Weighted Mean Interval Interpretation

A1 3.3333 Agree
A2 3.0667 Agree
A3 3.0333 Agree
A4 3.0333 Agree
A5 3.2667 Agree
A6 2.9667 Agree
A7 3.0000 Agree
A8 3.2333 Agree
Composite Mean 3.1167 Agree

PU Weighted Mean Interval Interpretation

BI 3.1333 Agree
B2 2.9667 Agree
B3 3.0000 Agree
B4 2.9000 Agree
B5 3.2333 Agree
B6 3.2667 Agree
Composite Mean 3.0833 Agree
 ATTI Weighted Mean Interval Interpretation
C1 3.1667 Agree
C2 3.2667 Agree
C3 3.1667 Agree
C4 3.2000 Agree
C5 3.1000 Agree
C6 2.9333 Agree
C7 2.9667 Agree
C8 3.0333 Agree
Composite Mean 3.1042 Agree

BI Weighted Mean Interval Interpretation

D1 3.3000 Agree
D2 3.1333 Agree
D3 3.1000 Agree
D4 3.0667 Agree
D5 3.0333 Agree
D6 2.9000 Agree
D7 3.1000 Agree
Composite Mean 3.0905 Agree

ANOVA

By Age
Variables f-value p-value Interpretation
PEOU 1.211 .314 Not Significant
PU 1.182 .322 Not Significant
ATTI 1.142 .334 Not Significant
BI .595 .559 Not Significant
By Gender
Variables f-value p-value Interpretation
PEOU .592 .560 Not Significant
PU .094 .910 Not Significant
ATTI .125 .883 Not Significant
BI .913 .414 Not Significant

Spearman

Variables Rho-value p-value Interpretation

PEOU vs. PU .601 .000 Significant
PEOU vs. ATTI .680 .000 Significant
PEOU vs. BI .568 .001 Significant
PU vs. ATTI .809 .000 Significant
PU vs. BI .743 .000 Significant
ATTI vs. BI .677 .000 Significant

Chi square

Variable Pearson Chi-square p-value Interpretation

PEOU vs. Age 20.437 .556 Not Significant
PEOU vs. Gender 31.136 .093 Not Significant
PU vs. Age 20.2664 .567 Not Significant
PU vs. Gender 25.299 .283 Not Significant
ATTI vs. Age 39.297 .046 Significant
ATTI vs. Gender 14.666 .963 Not Significant
BI vs. Age 38.135 .018 Significant
BI vs. Gender 17.116 .757 Not Significant