Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II

Midterms Course Syllabus


A.Y. 2018 – 2019

Prof. Jose Angelo A. David

ASSIGNMENT FOR FIRST MEETING:


REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION AND REQUISITES FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

1. Read all cases in their full text. There will be recitations every meeting, including
the first meeting. Requests for ceasefire will not be entertained.
2. No book will be required for use in class for the entire semester. However, it is
highly recommended to read the relevant chapters in any or all of the books
authored by Fr. Joaquin G. Bernas, Justice Antonio Eduardo B. Nachura and Atty.
Hector de Leon.
3. Always be prepared for a quiz. Bring yellow pad paper every meeting.
4. IMPORTANT: These cases are subject to change with prior notice at least three
days before class.

REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION AND REQUISITES FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW Commented [JAD1]: These cases will not be discussed in
class. You may read them in your free time.

I. Constitution, Definition and Characteristics


a. Manila Prince Hotel v. GSIS, G.R. No. 122156, February 3, 1997, 267 SCRA
408
b. Lopez v. De los Reyes 55 Phil. 186, 188
c. Alfredo M. de Leon v. Hon. Benjamin B. Esguerra, G.R. No. 78059, August
31, 1987
d. Saturnino Ocampo v. Rear Admiral Ernesto Enriquez, G.R. No. 225973, 8
November 2016 (“Marcos Burial case”)

II. General Principles of Constitutional Construction


a. Francisco v. House of Representatives, G.R. No. 160261, November 10,
2003

III. Nature of and requisites for judicial review


a. Article VIII, Section 1 and Section 4 of the 1987 Constitution
b. Rules of Court, Rules 63 and 65
c. Record of the Constitutional Commission, 434-436 (1986)
d. Endencia v. David, 93 Phil. 696 (1953)
e. Angara v. Electoral Commission, G.R. No. L-45081, 15 July 1936
f. Southern Hemisphere Engagement Network, Inc. v. Anti-Terrorism
Council, G.R. No. 178552, 5 October 2010
g. David v. Arroyo, G.R. No. 171396, 3 May 2006
h. Hon. Philip Aguinaldo v. President Benigno Aquino, G.R. No. 224302, 29
November 2016 (“Sandiganbayan Justices case”)
i. General v. Urro, G.R. No. 191560, 29 March 2011

FUNDAMENTAL POWERS OF THE STATE Commented [JAD2]: Update the cases and laws based on
our last meeting.
POLICE POWER

1
1. Aquino v. Municipality of Malay Aklan [G.R. No. 211356, September 29,
2014]
2. MMDA v. Bel-Air [G.R. No. 135962, March 27, 2000]
3. Philippine Association of Service Exporters vs. Drilon [G.R. No. L-81958, June
30, 1988]
4. Ichong vs. Hernandez [G.R. No. L-7995, May 31, 1957]
5. Lutz vs. Araneta [G.R. No. L-7859, December 22, 1955]
6. Association of Small Landowners vs. Secretary of Agrarian Reform [G.R. No.
78742, July 14, 1989]
7. Lozano vs. Martinez [G.R. No. L-63419, December 18, 1986]
8. Department of Education, Culture and Sports vs. San Diego[G.R. No. 89572,
December 21, 1989]
9. Ynot vs. Intermediate Appellate Court [G.R. No. 74457, March 20, 1987]
10. City Government of Quezon City vs. Ericta [G.R. No. L-34915, June 24, 1983]
11. Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)
12. Pennsylvania Coal Co v. Mahon, 43 Sup Ct 158 (1922)

POWER OF EMINENT DOMAIN

1. RP v. Mupas [G.R. No. 181892, September 8, 2015]


2. NPC v. Posada [G.R. No. 191945, March 11, 2015]
3. Secretary of DPWH v. Tecson [G.R. No. 179334, April 21, 2015]
4. City of Manila vs. Chinese Community of Manila [G.R. No. 14355, October 31, 1919]
5. Republic vs. Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. [G.R. No. L-18841,
January 27, 1969]
6. People vs. Fajardo [G.R. No. L-12172, August 29, 1958]
7. Republic vs. Vda. De Castellvi [G.R. No. L-20620, August 15, 1974]
8. Amigable vs. Cuenca [G.R. No. L-26400, February 29, 1972]
9. Philippine Press Institute vs. COMELEC [G.R. No. 119694, May 22, 1995]
10. Sumulong vs. Guerrero [G.R. No. L-48685, September 30, 1987]
11. Manosca vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 106440. January 29, 1996.]
12. EPZA vs. Dulay [G.R. No. L-59603, April 29, 1987]
13. Municipality of Parañaque vs. V.M. Realty Corp. [G.R. No. 127820, July 20, 1998]
14. RP v. Heirs of Borbon [G.R. No. 165354, January 12, 2015]
15. Rule 67, Revised Rules of Court

POWER OF TAXATION Commented [JAD3]: Please note the changes to the


syllabus.
1. Pascual vs. Secretary of Public Works [G.R. No. L-10405, December 29, 1960] Topics for January 16, 17 and 19, 2019 are:
2. Punsalan vs. Municipal Board of Manila [G.R. No. L-4817, May 26, 1954]
3. Lladoc vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue [G.R. No. L-19201, June 16, 1965] 1.Power of Taxation
2.Article III, Section 1 – Due Process and Equal
4. Abra Valley College vs. Aquino [G.R. No. L-39086, June 15, 1988] Protection
5. Ferrer v. Bautista [G.R. No. 210551, June 30, 2015]
6. 1987 Phil. Consti.: (1) Article III, Section 20, (2) Article VI, Section 24, (3)
Article VI, Section 28, (4) Article VI, Section 29, and (5) Article XIV, Section 4.

ARTICLE III – THE BILL OF RIGHTS

1. PBM Employees Association vs. Philippine Blooming Mills [G.R. No. L-31195, June
5, 1973]
2. People v. Marti [G.R. No. 81561, January 18, 1991]
3. ST. LUKE'S MEDICAL CENTER, INC. vs. MARIA THERESA V. SANCHEZ [G.R.
No. 212054. March 11, 2015]
4. Silahis International Hotel v. Soluta [G.R. No. 163087, February 20, 2006]

Section 1

2
Due Process of Law

1. Ichong vs. Hernandez [G.R. No. L-7995, May 31, 1957]


2. Philippine Phosphate Fertilizer Corp. vs. Torres [G.R. No. 98050, March 17, 1994]
3. Ynot vs. Intermediate Appellate Court [G.R. No. 74457, March 20, 1987]
4. Alonte vs. Savellano [G.R. No. 131652, March 9, 1998]
5. Aniag vs. COMELEC [G.R. No. 104961, October 7, 1994]
6. People v. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 183652, February 25, 2015]
7. Ang Tibay vs. Court of Industrial Relations [G.R. No. 46496, February 27, 1940]
8. Ateneo de Manila vs. Capulong [G.R. No. 99327, May 27, 1993]
9. Cudia v. Superintendent of the PMA [G.R. No. 211362, February 24, 2015]
10. Mortel v. Kerr [G.R. No. 156296, November 12, 2012]
11. Garcia v. Drilon [G.R. No. 179267, June 25, 2013]
12. Legaspi v. City of Cebu [G.R. No. 159110, December 10, 2013]
13. Philippine Communications Satellite Corp. vs. Alcuaz [G.R. No. 84818, December
18, 1989]
14. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES represented by the BUREAU OF FOOD AND
DRUGS (now FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION) vs. DRUGMAKER'S
LABORATORIES, INC. [G.R. No. 190837. March 5, 2014]
15. Association of International Shipping Lines, Inc. v. Philippine Ports Authority
[G.R. No. 158000, March 31, 2005]
16. GMA Network, Inc. v. NTC [G.R. No. 19611, February 26, 2014]

Equal protection of the Laws

1. People vs. Vera [G.R. No. 45685, November 16, 1937]


2. Ichong vs. Hernandez [G.R. No. L-7995, May 31, 1957]
3. Villegas vs. Hiu Chiong Tsai Pao Ho [G.R. No. L-29646, November 10, 1978]
4. Dumlao vs. COMELEC [G.R. No. L-52245, January 22, 1980]
5. Philippine Association of Service Exporters vs. Drilon [G.R. No. L-81958, June 30,
1988]
6. Garcia v. Drilon [G.R. No. 179267, June 25, 2013]
7. Himagan vs. People [G.R. No. 113811, October 7, 1994]
8. Quinto vs. COMELEC [G.R. No. 189698, February 22, 2010]
9. Biraogo vs. The Philippine Truth Commission [G.R. No. 192935, December 7, 2010]
10. Almonte vs. Vazquez [G.R. No. 95367, May 23, 1995]
11. Ormoc Sugar Co., Inc. vs. Treasurer of Ormoc City [G.R. No. L-23794, February
17, 1968]
12. Bartolome v. SSS [G.R. No. 192531, November 12, 2014]
13. Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 US ___ (2015)

Section 2 – Searches and Seizures

1. People vs. Marti [G.R. No. 81561, January 18, 1991]


2. Stonehill vs. Diokno [G.R. No. L-19550, June 19, 1967]
3. Soliven vs. Makasiar [G.R. No. 82585, November 14, 1988]
4. Silva vs. Presiding Judge of RTC, Negros Oriental [G.R. No. 81756, October 21,
1991]
5. Morano vs. Vivo [G.R. No. L-22196, June 30, 1967]
6. Harvey vs. Santiago [G.R. No. 82544, June 28, 1988]
7. Alvarez vs. CFI [G.R. No. 45358, January 29, 1937]
8. Mata vs. Bayona [G.R. No. 50720, March 26, 1984]
9. People vs. Del Rosario [G.R. No. 109633, July 20, 1994]
10. Umil vs. Ramos [G.R. No. 81567, July 9, 1990]
11. People vs. Sucro [G.R. No. 93239, March 18, 1991]
12. People vs. Rodrigueza [G.R. No. 95902, February 4, 1992]
13. Go. Vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 101837, February 11, 1992]

3
14. Posadas vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 89139, August 2, 1990]
15. People vs. Mengote [G.R. No. 87059, June 22, 1992]
16. Malacat vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 123595, December 12, 1997]
17. People vs. Aminnudin [G.R. No. L-74869, July 6, 1988]
18. People vs. Malmstedt [G.R. No. 91107, June 19, 1991]
19. Espano vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 120431, April 1, 1998]
20. Papa vs. Mago [G.R. No. L-27360, February 28, 1968]
21. People vs. Musa [G.R. No. 96177, January 27, 1993]
22. Valmonte vs. De Villa [G.R. No. 83988, September 29, 1989]
23. Microsoft Corporation v. Samir [G.R. No. 205800, September 10, 2014]
24. Commerciante v. People [G.R. No. 205926, July 22, 2015]
25. Celedonio v. People [G.R. No. 209137, July 1, 2015]
26. Sydeco v. People [G.R. No. 202692, November 12, 2014]
27. People v. Mercado [G.R. No. 207988, March 11, 2015]
28. Del Castillo v. People [G.R. No. 185128, January 30, 2012]
29. Manalili v. CA [G.R. No. 113447, October 9, 1997]
30. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)
31. Rules 113 and 126 of the Revised Rules of Court

Section 3 – Privacy of Communication and Correspondence

1. Ramirez vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 93833, September 28, 1995]
2. Zulueta vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 107383, February 20, 1996]
3. Navarro vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 121087, August 26, 1999]
4. Ople vs. Torres [G.R. No. 127685, July 23, 1998]
5. Vivares v. STC [G.R. No. 202666, September 29, 2014]
6. Gamboa v. Chan [G.R. No. 193636, July 24, 2012]
7. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347
8. Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928)

Section 4

Freedom of Expression

1. United States vs. Bustos [G.R. No. L-12592, March 8, 1918]


2. People vs. Alarcon [G.R. No. 46551, December 12, 1939]
3. Ayer Productions PTY Ltd. vs. Capulong [G.R. No. L-82380, April 29, 1988]
4. Borjal vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 126466, January 14, 1999]
5. Reyes vs. Bagatsing [G.R. No. L-65366, November 9, 1983]
6. Pita vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 80806, October 5, 1989]
7. Social Weather Stations, Inc. vs. COMELEC [G.R. No. 147571, May 5, 2001]
8. Social Weather Stations, Inc. vs. COMELEC [G.R. No. 208062, April 7, 2015]
9. 1-United Transport v. COMELEC [G.R. No. 206020, April 14, 2015]
10. Diocese of Bacolod v. COMELEC [G.R. No. 205728, January 21, 2015]

Assembly and Petition

1. Primicias vs. Fugoso [G.R. No. L-1800, January 27, 1948]


2. Malabanan vs. Ramento [G.R. No. 62270, May 21, 1984]
3. De la Cruz vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 126183, March 25, 1999]
4. PBM Employees Association vs. Philippine Blooming Mills [G.R. No. L-31195,
June 5, 1973]
5. Bayan vs. Ermita [G.R. No. 169838, April 25, 2006]
6. Batas Pambansa Blg. 880

Section 5 – Freedom of Religion

1. Aglipay vs. Ruiz [G.R. No. 45459, March 13, 1937]

4
2. Garces vs. Estenzo [G.R. No. L-53487, May 25, 1981]
3. American Bible Society vs. City of Manila [G.R. No. L-9637, April 30, 1957]
4. Iglesia Ni Cristo vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 119673, July 26, 1996]
5. Ebralinag vs. Division Superintendent of Cebu [G.R. No. 95770, March 1, 1993]
6. Estrada vs. Escritor [A.M. No. P-02-1651, June 22, 2006]
7. Perfecto v. Esidera [A.M. No. RTJ-15-2417, July 22, 2015]
8. Imbong v. Ochoa [G.R. No. 204819, April 8, 2014]

Section 6 – Liberty of Abode and of Travel

1. Marcos vs. Manglapus [G.R. No. 88211, September 15, 1989]


2. Manotoc vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. L-62100, May 30, 1986]
3. Silverio vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 94284, April 8, 1991]

Section 7 – Right to Information

1. Legaspi vs. Civil Service Commission [G.R. No. 72119, May 29, 1987]
2. Valmonte vs. Belmonte, Jr. [G.R. No. 74930, February 13, 1989]
3. Province of Cotabato vs. The Gov’t. of the RP Peace Panel on Ancestral Domain [G.R.
No. 183591, October 14, 2008]
4. Echagaray vs. Secretary of Justice [G.R. NO. 132601, October 12, 1998]
5. Chavez vs. Presidential Commission on Good Government [G.R. No. 130716, December
9, 1998]
6. Akbayan v. Aquino [G.R. No. 170516, July 16, 2008]

Section 8 – Right to Form Associations

1. SSS Employees Association vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 85279, July 28, 1989]
2. Victoriano vs. Elizalde Rope Workers’ Union [G.R. No. L-25246, September 12,
1974]
3. In re: IBP membership Dues Delinquency of Atty. Marcial Edillon [A.C. No. 1928,
August 3, 1978]

Section 10 – Non-Impairment Clause

1. Rutter vs. Esteban [G.R. No. L-3708, May 18, 1953]


2. Ortigas & Co. Ltd. Partnership vs. Feati Bank & Trust Co. [G.R. No. L-24670, December
14, 1979]
3. Lozano vs. Martinez [G.R. No. L-63419, December 18, 1986]
4. Ganzon vs. Inserto [G.R. No. L-56450, July 25, 1983]

Section 12 – Custodial Investigation

1. Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436


2. Gamboa vs. Cruz [G.R. No. L-56291, June 27, 1988]
3. People vs. Macam [G.R. Nos. 91011-12, November 24, 1994]
4. People vs. Judge Ayson [G.R. No. 85215, July 7, 1989]
5. People vs. Pinlac [G.R. Nos. 74123-24, September 26, 1988]
6. People vs. Bolanos [G.R. No. 101808, July 3, 1992]
7. People vs. Andan [G.R. No. 116437, March 3, 1997]
8. Navallo vs. Sandiganbayan [G.R. No. 97214, July 18, 1994]
9. People vs. Dy [G.R. No. 74517, February 23, 1988]
10. People vs. Alicando [G.R. No. 117487, December 12, 1995]
11. De Castro vs. People [G.R. No. 171672, February 2, 2015]
12. People vs. Gallarde [G.R. No. 133025, February 17, 2000]
13. People vs. Samus [G.R. No. 135957, September 17, 2002]
14. Ladiana vs. People [G.R. No. 144293, December 4, 2002]
15. People vs. Escordial 373 SCRA 585

5
16. Republic Act No. 7438

Вам также может понравиться