Four temperaments

The four temperament theory is a proto-psychological theory

which suggests that there are four fundamental personality types:
sanguine, choleric, melancholic, and phlegmatic.[2][3] Most
formulations include the possibility of mixtures among the types
where an individual's personality types overlap and they share two or
more temperaments. Greek physician Hippocrates (c. 460 – c. 370 BC)
described the four temperaments as part of the ancient medical
concept of humorism, that four bodily fluids affect human personality
traits and behaviors. Modern medical science does not define a fixed
relationship between internal secretions and personality, although
some psychological personality type systems use categories similar to
the Greek temperaments.

Contents
History and development
Four fundamental personality types
Modern views
See also
References 18th-century depiction of the four temperaments,[1]
Further reading Phlegmatic and choleric above, Sanguine and melancholic
below
External links

History and development

Temperament theory has its roots in the ancient theory of humorism. It may have originated in Ancient Egyptian medicine[4] or in
Mesopotamia,[5] but it was Greek physician Hippocrates (460–370 BC) who developed it into a medical theory. He believed that certain
human moods, emotions, and behaviors were caused by an excess or lack of body fluids (called "humors"), which he classified as blood,
yellow bile, black bile, and phlegm.[3] Galen (AD 129 – c. 200) developed the first typology of temperament in his dissertation De
temperamentis, and searched for physiological reasons for different behaviors in humans. He classified them as hot/cold and dry/wet
taken from the four elements.[6] There could also be "balance" between the qualities, yielding a total of nine temperaments. The word
"temperament" itself comes from Latin "temperare", "to mix". In the ideal personality, the complementary characteristics were
exquisitely balanced among warm-cool and dry-moist. In four less-ideal types, one of the four qualities was dominant over all the others.
In the remaining four types, one pair of qualities dominated the complementary pair; for example, warm and moist dominated cool and
dry. These last four were the temperamental categories which Galen named "sanguine", "choleric", "melancholic", and
"phlegmatic" after the bodily humors. Each was the result of an excess of one of the humors which produced the imbalance in paired
qualities.[3][7][8][9]

Persian polymath Avicenna (980–1037 AD) extended the theory of temperaments in his Canon of Medicine, which was a standard
medical text at many medieval universities. He applied them to "emotional aspects, mental capacity, moral attitudes, self-awareness,
movements and dreams."[10] Nicholas Culpeper (1616–1654) suggested that the humors acted as governing principles in bodily health,
with astrological correspondences,[11] and explained their influence upon physiognomy and personality.[12] He proposed that some
people had a single temperament, while others had an admixture of two, a primary and secondary temperament.[13]

Modern medical science has rejected the theories of the four temperaments, though their use persists as a metaphor within certain
psychological fields.[14] Immanuel Kant (1724–1804), Rudolf Steiner (1861–1925), Alfred Adler (1879–1937), Erich Adickes (1866
–1925), Eduard Spranger (1914), Ernst Kretschmer (1920), and Erich Fromm (1947) all theorized on the four temperaments (with
different names) and greatly shaped modern theories of temperament. Hans Eysenck (1916–1997) was one of the first psychologists to
analyze personality differences using a psycho-statistical method called factor analysis, and his research led him to believe that
temperament is biologically based. The factors that he proposed in his book Dimensions of Personality were neuroticism (N), the
tendency to experience negative emotions, and extraversion (E), the tendency to enjoy positive events, especially social ones. By pairing
the two dimensions, Eysenck noted how the results were similar to the four ancient temperaments.
Other researchers developed similar systems, many of which
did not use the ancient temperament names, and several
paired extraversion with a different factor which would
determine relationship and task-orientation. Examples are
DiSC assessment, social styles, and a theory that adds a fifth
temperament. One of the most popular today is the Keirsey
Temperament Sorter, whose four temperaments were based
largely on the Greek gods Apollo, Dionysus, Epimetheus, and
Prometheus, and were mapped to the 16 types of the Myers
–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). They were renamed as
Artisan (SP), Guardian (SJ), Idealist (NF), and Rational (NT).

Relation of various four temperament

theories
Choleric, sanguine, melancholic, and phlegmatic temperaments:
Classical Element Adler[15]
17c., part of the Grande Commande
Melancholic Earth Avoiding

Phlegmatic Water Getting

Sanguine Air Socially useful

Choleric Fire Ruling

Four fundamental personality types

Most individuals tend to have aspects of their personality which identify with each of the four temperaments. However, there are usually
two primary temperaments that are displayed at a significantly higher level. An individual could be any combination of the following
four types.

Sanguine personality type is described primarily as being highly talkative, enthusiastic, active, and social. Sanguines tend to be more
extroverted and enjoy being part of a crowd; they find that being social, outgoing, and charismatic is easy to accomplish.[2][3] Individuals
with this personality have a hard time doing nothing and engage in more risk seeking behaviour.[2]

Choleric individuals tend to be more extroverted. They are described as independent, decisive, and goal-oriented, and ambitious.
These combined with their dominant, result-oriented outlook make them natural leaders. In Greek, Medieval and Renaissance thought,
they were also violent, vengeful, and short-tempered.[16]

Melancholic individuals tend to be analytical and detail-oriented, and they are deep thinkers and feelers. They are introverted and try
to avoid being singled out in a crowd.[2] A melancholic personality leads to self-reliant individuals who are thoughtful, reserved, and
often anxious.[2] They often strive for perfection within themselves and their surroundings, which leads to tidy and detail oriented
behavior.[2]

Phlegmatic individuals tend to be relaxed, peaceful, quiet, and easy-going.[2] They are sympathetic and care about others, yet they try
to hide their emotions. Phlegmatic individuals also are good at generalizing ideas or problems to the world and making compromises.[2]

Modern views
Waldorf education and anthroposophy believe that the temperaments help to understand personality. Christian writer Tim LaHaye has
attempted to repopularize the ancient temperaments through his books.[17][18][19] Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach composed the trio sonata in
C minor “Sanguineus et Melancholicus“ Wq 161/1. Émile Zola employed the four temperaments in Thérèse Raquin.[20] Carl Nielsen's
Symphony No. 2 (Op.16) is titled and structured upon "The Four Temperaments."[21]

See also
◾ Enneagram of Personality
◾ Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation
◾ Table of similar systems of comparison of temperaments
◾ Two-factor models of personality.

References
 1. Woodcut from Johann Kaspar Lavater, Physiognomische Fragmente zur Beförderung der Menschenkenntnis und Menschenliebe
(1775–1778)
2. "The Four Human Temperaments" (http://www.thetransformedsoul.com/additional-studies/miscellaneous-studies/the-four-human-
temperaments). www.thetransformedsoul.com.
3. Merenda, P. F. (1987). "Toward a Four-Factor Theory of Temperament and/or Personality"
(https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5103_4). Journal of Personality Assessment. 51: 367–374. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5103_4
(https://doi.org/10.1207%2Fs15327752jpa5103_4).
4. van Sertima, Ivan (1992). The Golden Age of the Moor (https://archive.org/details/goldenageofmoor00vans/page/17). Transaction
Publishers. p. 17 (https://archive.org/details/goldenageofmoor00vans/page/17). ISBN 1-56000-581-5.
5. Sudhoff, Karl (1926). "Essays in the History of Medicine". Medical Life Press, New York: 67, 87, 104.
6. Boeree, C. George. "Early Medicine and Physiology" (http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/neurophysio.html). Retrieved 21 February
2013.
7. Kagan, Jerome (1998). Galen's Prophecy: Temperament In Human Nature (https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780465084050). New
York: Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-08405-2.
8. Osborn L. Ac., David K. "INHERENT TEMPERAMENT" (http://www.greekmedicine.net/b_p/Inherent_Temperament.html).
Retrieved 21 February 2013.
9. "Archived copy"
(https://web.archive.org/web/20110720112637/http://sun2.science.wayne.edu/~tpartrid/Manuscripts/HEETemperament1.25.02.doc).
Archived from the original (http://sun2.science.wayne.edu/~tpartrid/Manuscripts/HEETemperament1.25.02.doc) on 2011-07-20.
Retrieved 2010-03-26.
10. Lutz, Peter L. (2002). The Rise of Experimental Biology: An Illustrated History. Humana Press. p. 60. ISBN 0-89603-835-1.
11. Nicholas Culpeper (1653) An Astrologo-Physical Discourse of the Human Virtues in the Body of Man
(http://www.skyscript.co.uk/astrodiscourse.html), transcribed and annotated by Deborah Houlding. Skyscript, 2009 (retrieved 16
November 2011). Originally published in Culpeper's Complete Herbal (English Physician). London: Peter Cole, 1652.
12. Nicholas Culpeper, Semeiotica Urania, or Astrological Judgement of Diseases. London: 1655. Reprint, Nottingham: Ascella, 1994.
13. Greenbaum, Dorian Gieseler (2005). Temperament: Astrology's Forgotten Key. Wessex Astrologer. pp. 42, 91. ISBN 1-902405-
17-X.
14. Martindale, Anne E.; Martindale, Colin (1988). "Metaphorical equivalence of elements and temperaments: Empirical studies of
Bachelard's theory of imagination". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 55 (5): 836. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.836
(https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0022-3514.55.5.836).
15. Lundin, Robert W. (1989). Alfred-Adler's Basic Concepts and Implications
(https://archive.org/details/alfredadlersbasi0000lund/page/54). Taylor and Francis. p. 54
(https://archive.org/details/alfredadlersbasi0000lund/page/54). ISBN 0-915202-83-2.
16. "The Four Humours" (http://www.kheper.net/topics/typology/four_humours.html).
17. LaHaye, Tim (1966). The Spirit Controlled Temperament. Tyndale Publishing.
18. LaHaye, Tim (1984). Your Temperament: Discover Its Potential (https://archive.org/details/spiritcontrolled00laha_1). Tyndale
Publishing. ISBN 0-8423-6220-7.
19. LaHaye, Tim. Why You Act the Way You Do (https://archive.org/details/whyyouactwayyoud00laha). Tyndale Publishing.
ISBN 0-8423-8212-7.
20. Zola, Preface to Thérèse Raquin.
21. Foltmann, Niels Bo, ed. (1998). Symphony No. 2
(http://www.kb.dk/export/sites/kb_dk/da/nb/dcm/cnu/pdf/CNU_II_02_symphony_2.pdf) (PDF). Carl Nielsen Works. II. Instrumental
Music. 2. The Carl Nielsen Edition, Royal Danish Library. ISBN 978-87-598-0913-6. ISMN M-66134-000-3. Archived
(https://web.archive.org/web/20141016161615/http://www.kb.dk/export/sites/kb_dk/da/nb/dcm/cnu/pdf/CNU_II_02_symphony_2.pdf)
(PDF) from the original on 16 October 2014.

Further reading
◾ Arikha, Noga (2007). Passions and Tempers: A History of the Humours. Harpers. ISBN 978-0060731175

External links
◾ In Our Time (BBC Radio 4) episode on the four humours (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/inourtime/inourtime_20071220.shtml)
in MP3 format, 45 minutes

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Four_temperaments&oldid=925626690"

This page was last edited on 11 November 2019, at 08:43 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree
to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit
organization.