Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
equation shown for gf in Exhibit C16-10 assumes that the subject approach is a
single-lane approach like the opposing approach. If the subject approach is a multilane
approach, the equation for gf from Exhibit C16-9 should be used. In either case, if the
subject lane group is an exclusive left-turn lane, then gf = 0.
• For multilane lane groups (Exhibit C16-9), PL is computed as the proportion of left
turns in the left-hand lane of the lane group. If this value is determined to be 1.0 or
higher, the lane groups for the approach should be reassigned showing this left-hand lane
as an exclusive left-turn lane (a de facto left-turn lane), since it is occupied entirely by
left-turning vehicles. This change requires redoing all of the computations for this
approach. If a multilane lane group is opposed by a single-lane approach, Exhibit C16-10
should be used, but a value of PL should be estimated and substituted for PLT, as
described in this appendix. In this case, the same de facto left-turn check should be
applied.
• Exhibit C16-3 is used to determine the value of EL1 based on the opposing flow
rate and the lane utilization factor of the opposing flow. For the single-lane approach
(Exhibit C16-4), EL2 is computed by formula, not by Exhibit C16-3.
• The value of fm is computed. The maximum value is 1.0 and the minimum value
is 2(1 + PL)/g. These limits are used if the computed value falls outside this range.
• The left-turn adjustment factor, fLT, is computed. For a single-lane group, fLT =
fm. If a multilane lane group is opposed by a single-lane approach, Exhibit C16-10 is
used, but fLT is calculated on the basis of f m and the number of lanes as shown in Exhibit
C16-9 except when the subject lane group contains multiple exclusive left-turn lanes.
or
OCCpedg = 0.4 + v pedg /10,000 (1000 < vpedg ≤ 5,000 and 0.5 < OCCpedg ≤ 0.9)
Step 2: Determine relevant conflict zone occupancy, OCCr
If bicycle traffic weaves with right-turning vehicles in advance of the stop line, the
bicycle volume should be ignored in the analysis because this interaction does not take
place within the intersection. Only pedestrian interference should be considered.
16-135 Chapter 16 - Signalized Intersections
Appendix C
Highway Capacity Manual 2000
Opposing
traffic
Peds Peds
Receiving lanes
Cross street
Bicycle-vehicle
conflict zone
Turning
paths
Pedestrian-vehicle
conflict zone Receiving
lanes
Peds
Peds Bikes
Turning
lane(s)
[
OCCr = OCC pedu e −(5 /3600 )v o ] (D16-8)
Compute pedestrian
occupancy, OCCpedg
Determine relevant
occupancy, OCCr
Yes
gq > gp? All ped occupancy Compute bicycle
is relevant occupancy
No
fLpb = 1.0
• If the number of cross-street receiving lanes exceeds the number of turning lanes,
turning vehicles will more likely maneuver around pedestrians or bicycles and pedestrian-
bicycle effects on saturation flow are reduced. The adjustment factor can be calculated
using Equation D16-10.
ApbT = 1 – 0.6(OCCr) (Nrec > Nturn) (D16-10)
Step 4: Determine saturation flow adjustment factors for turning movements, fLpb,
for left-turn movements and fRpb for right-turn movements.
Saturation flow adjustment factors account for pedestrian-bicycle effects on
saturation flow for turning vehicles, and the factors are dependent on the proportion of
turning traffic using protected phases. The proportion of right-turn movements is roughly
equal to the proportion of the protected green phase. The proportion of left-turn
movements is approximately equal to [1 – (permitted phase f LT)]/0.95.
• For right-turn movements, the pedestrian-bicycle adjustment factor, fRpb , can be
calculated using Equation D16-11.