Misamis University

Ozamiz City
Graduate School

BA 264- Statistics

Assignments
(Course Requirement)

Dr. Carolina B. Baguio

Professor

May G. Tamala
MBA-1 Student
 Chapter 5

I.

6. 3 ways

8. 10 ways

11. 18 ways

14. 1 way

II.

3. a) S= (NY, NN,NU,YY,YN,YU,YU,UU,UN,UY)= 9

b) F=4/9

c) A=5/9

d) U=8/9

9. a) 41/61= .6875

b) 0.2131

c) 22/61=.3607

d) 11/61=.1803

e) 44/61=.7213

f) 45/61=.7377

g) 0.7317>0.45 CASS is more probable to be employed

19. a) P(D) = 70/200

b) P( d/s) =20/100

c) P(M uL) = 50/200

d) P(M u S) = .75
 Chapter 6

II.

2. a) .27739

c) .642376

3. a) .22457

b) .3395

c.) .99435

4. a) 5 men will be alive P(x-5)=.1350125

b) P(X=3,4,5)= .7950025107

c) P(x-2)= .1613211.93

III.

7. a) .3085

b) 70

c) 48

d) 67

9. a) P(X<128)=.0668, 500 x .0668=33.4 33

b) P( X > 185) =.0116, 500 x x.0116= 5.8 6

c) P(120<X<155)= .5885, 500 x x.5885= 294.25 294

11. a) P(7<X<10)=.4332

b) P (X<3)= .0228

c) P(X> 10)= .0668

 Chapter 7

Confidence Interval for the Population Mean:

4. For 11.09 tons = it is about 10.91

For .73 tons = it is about 11.27

10.

n1 = 5, n2 = 7, α = 0.1, t0.05,10 = 1.812.

x1 = 103 + 94 + 110 + 87 + 98 5 = 98.4

x2 = 97 + 82 + 123 + 92 + 175 + 88 + 118 7 = 110.714

x1 − x2 = −12.314s 2 1 = 1 4 [(1032 + · · · + 982 ) − 5(98.4)2 ] = 76.3

s 2 2 = 1 6 [(972 + · · · + 1182 ) − 7(110.714)2 ] = 1035.905

s 2 p = 4(76.3) + 6(1035.979) 5 + 7 − 2 = 652.063

t0.05,10 · sp s 1 n1 + 1 n2 = 1.812 · √ 652.107s 1 5 + 1 7 = 27.093

Hence the 99% CI for µ1 − µ2 is (−12.314 − 27.094, −12.314 + 27.094) = (−39.407, 14.779)

III. Confidence Interval for the Difference Between Two Population Means

𝜇𝐴 − 𝜇𝐵 = 𝑋, 𝑏𝑎𝑟 𝐴 − 𝑋, 𝑏𝑎𝑟 𝐵 ± 𝑍𝜎 𝐴 − 𝐵

For a confidence level then, m 95% to Z = 1.96

𝜇𝐴 − 𝜇𝐵 = (1400 − 1200) ± 1.96 ∗ 11.31

= 200 ± 22.16

177.8 <𝝁𝑨 − 𝝁𝑩< 222.16

3. (0.8351, 1.3049), New sleeping pill induced longer sleeping hours

10.

Student 1 2 3 4 5 6
GPA 2NDSem 1.8 2.4 2.5 2.0 1.7 2.0
GPA 1ST SEM 2.0 1.9 3.0 2.5 2.4 2.0
di = X2i – X1i -.20 0.50 -0.50 -0.50 -0.70 0

Step 1: Compute for di = X2i – X1iH

Step 2: The d, bar and sd are computed as follows:

d,bar = (-.20+0.50+-0.50+-0.50+-0.70+0)/6 = -1.4

or using this online calculator, I was able to arrive at the mean(average) and standard deviation
easily:

https://www.easycalculation.com/statistics/standard-deviation.php

Step 3: Therefore, the 90% confidence interval for 𝜇𝑑 is given by

Given 1-a = 0.90 where a = 0.10; v= n-1 where v = 5 & t = 2.015

D,bar±t {(sd)/(√n)}

3.98 ±(2.015 ) (3.27979/√6) = 3.98 ± 2.698

=3.98 -2.698 <𝜇<3.98+2.698

=1.282 <𝜇< 6.678

Since the lower and upper boundary are both positive, the interval does not contain zero. It
only means that we are 90% confident that there is really a significant change in the grades
from the second semester of year 2005-2006 as compared to 1st semester of year 2006-2007.

IV: Confidence Intervals for Proportions

4.

𝐻0: 𝑝1 = 𝑝2 (𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑚) 𝐻1: 𝑝1 ≠ 𝑝2

p^1 = 124/150 = .8267 p^2 = 200/250 = .80

q^1 = .1733 q^2 = .20

a= 2.756

The 99% confidence interval for p1 – p2 is given by:

(.8267 - .80) ±2.756√[{(.8267)(.1733)}/150+{(80)(.20)}/250}]

0.0267 ±< p1 – p2 < 0.11

Since both the lower and upper limits are positive, it means that there is significant
difference in the proportion of servers and proportion of cashiers who are women.
 Chapter 8

III.

3. H0: u= 13 and H1: u> 13; Level of significance a= .05; Case 3: t=-.99997;
Critical region: t> 2.571; Decision: Do not reject H0; Conclusion: At a=.05,
there is no sufficient evidence that the average drop is not 13 points, thus, the
claim is sustained.

V.

3. x2= 145.7812; Critical Value :X2 .01,4)= 13.277; Decision reject H0;
Conclusion: at a=.01, performance in physics and performance in mathematics
are dependent.

VI. 5. Critical value .3448; reject H0; there is enough evidence to conclude that there is
less variability in the gold plating done by company 1 than in the gold plating done by
company 2.