Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
GE P352 1 6.1 0
B X Appendix 2 X
1 X Appendix 3 X
2 X
3 X
4 X
5 X
6 X
7 X
8 X
9 X
10 X
11 X
12 X
13 X
14 X
15 X
16 X
17 X
18 X
1
GE 1 - Rév.5 - F/ANG
GE P352 1 6.1 0
B
OFFSHORE SAFETY - GENERAL
CONTENTS
1. FOREWORD
2. FACILITIES - REMINDER
3.2 LAYOUT
GE2R
-év4.F
-A
/NG
DOCUMENT GUIDE / Guide Document
Sce émetteur N° livre N° chapitre Rév.
GE P352 1 6.1 0
1. FOREWORD
Offshore operation is very similar to onshore operation. The essential difference lies
in the problems in connection with the marine environment, relative isolation and
special working conditions. Isolation of offshore facilities in a hazardous and hostile
environment leads to the installation of more elaborate and numerous safety
requirements compared to onshore facilities and to the installation of life saving and
evacuation facilities. Abandoning a platform, even under fair meteorological
conditions is a hazardous and even critical operation.
The purpose of this document is to define the major options and parameters for the
purposes of safety of life and of property to be taken into account at project design
stage. It may be divided into two parts:
facilities and their integration in environment / layout
platforms themselves.
This document should be considered as an aid for decision taking but it does not
pretend to solve all specific problems attached to each unit in the petroleum industry.
It should be noted that the final facilities are the result of optimized combination of
various conflicting issues and that they may never reach perfection from the safety
point of view. But it is necessary that the Contractor and the Owner should be
notified of the hazards to be taken into account in the design.
2. FACILITIES - REMINDER
Their purpose is field development and they are defined by process criteria. They may
include the following:
Producing wells, injection wells,
Oil/gas separation units,
Gas processing units,
Gas compression units,
Water injection,
Utilities (fresh water, chlorination, compressed air, etc.),
Power production,
Technical buildings (substation, control room, offices, etc.),
Living quarters,
GE 2 - Rév.4 - F/ANG
Flare, vents,
Storage facilities (immersed or floating),
DOCUMENT GUIDE / Guide Document
Sce émetteur N° livre N° chapitre Rév.
GE P352 1 6.1 0
The layout of these facilities vary as follows according to the costs directly attached to
water depth, location:
Single platform for high depth sea (such as in the North Sea),
Multiple platforms joined by bridges for low depth sea (such as in the Gulf).
Remark:
GE P352 1 6.1 0
GE P352 1 6.1 0
Notes:
Outside the criteria necessary for the calculation of mechanical strength of facilities,
environmental criteria, atmospheric conditions in particular, condition the design of
platforms, their respective position, their layout, and evacuation conditions, which are a
major issue.
The decision to evacuate the platform results from the comparison between two
hazards:
Maintaining personnel aboard under the conditions created by the hazardous
situation,
Evacuation of personnel under current atmospheric conditions.
Note 1 : Time not specified by regulations. It is defined with the Client, and, if
necessary, with Authorities, as a function of safety studies.
GE 2 - Rév.4 - F/ANG
Note 2 : Reference :
study carried out within the scope of N'KOSSA project - NKP barge
(Appendix 1).
DOCUMENT GUIDE / Guide Document
Sce émetteur N° livre N° chapitre Rév.
GE P352 1 6.1 0
In the case of facilities integrated on a single platform, the main spread agent in case
of incident is wind. Consequently, one will endeavour to have crossing wind (1) or
prevailing wind blowing from safe areas to hazardous areas (2).
FLARE
PW (1)
D P U LQ PW (2)
PW (1)
Key:
In the case of a complex including several platforms, the sea environment involves
two constraints of prime importance: the marine currents and the wave regime.
Actually, incident spread depends on the ability to drift of a oil slick, either ignited or
not, and on whether this slick may be held up/recovered.
In case of slick drift, the wind also is a major factor, as well as currents, to
determine the direction of this drift (combination of two directions).
Regarding the wave regime, it allows slick holdup and recovery operations or not
(limit: according to the type of equipment used, wave height, swell and frequency of
recurrence).
GE 2 - Rév.4 - F/ANG
DOCUMENT GUIDE / Guide Document
Sce émetteur N° livre N° chapitre Rév.
GE P352 1 6.1 0
Except in the North Sea where a safety area is preserved around platforms
(approximately 1/4 sea mile) in which navigation is prohibited and where means are
provided to control compliance with this law, most fields are not protected by any
regulations.
However, it is still necessary to study the hazard involved by damaged ships or ships
which cannot be manoeuvred, in particular when the facilities are in the vicinity of heavy
traffic shipping lanes or of loading buoys.
To minimize these hazards, the platform should expose, as far as possible, its smallest
surface on the wind, the swell and the fair current.
If a fishing area is present in the vicinity of facilities, experience has demonstrated that it
is very problematical to preserve easily removable equipment or fuel on unmanned
platforms, due to theft problems.
As early as at the outset of the project, it is recommended to obtain from the Owner
information on its philosophy regarding the duties and organization of its tender fleet.
3.2 LAYOUT
3.2.1 GENERAL
Considering the hazards specific to facilities in oil industry, compliance with essential
safety principles must be a permanent concern:
Grouping of all equipment items involving equivalent hazard levels in a same
geographical area.
Location of each area in relation to others so that any hazardous area should be
located downwind any less hazardous area.
Concrete partitions between these areas, if possible while preserving suitable
GE 2 - Rév.4 - F/ANG
natural ventilation.
Gas sources located distant from ignition sources.
DOCUMENT GUIDE / Guide Document
Sce émetteur N° livre N° chapitre Rév.
GE P352 1 6.1 0
API RP2G classifies equipment into six sets corresponding to six geographical
areas for installation which may be classified into three groups corresponding to of
hazard levels. This classification is indicated in table 1 below.
Besides, table 2 mentions compatibility criteria among the various types of sets.
TABLE 1
HAZARD
GR.1 GR.2 GR.3
GROUPS
Sets of facilities TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 (1) TYPE 4 TYPE 5 TYPE 6
Well heads Hydrocarbon Petroleum Hydrocarbon Rotary machinery Living quarters
(drilling and/or production and product storage production and and utilities
production) processing facilities processing
equipment with equipment with
neither direct heating
combustion
machines nor
burners
Main facilities Well head Separators Liquid or Exchan- Gaseous or Living
Chokes Sump liquefied gers and liquefied quarters
and equipment hydrocarbon hydrocar- hydrocarbon Utilities area
manifolds (atmos- tanks bon compressors Control room
Headers pheric or heaters Liquid or Switch board
pressu- with direct liquefied room
rized) heating hydrocarbon Any
Pig traps Flares A pumps equipment
Exhangers handling no
and heaters hydrocarbon
heated by driven by
heat carrier Power electric motor
fluid generators Water
Hydrocarbon actuated by treatment
metering heat engine and/or water
equipment Any injection unit
Liquid B equipment
hydrocar- item handling
bon tanks no hydrocar-
(less than bons driven by
15 m 3) heat engine
TABLE 2
DOCUMENT GUIDE / Guide Document
Sce émetteur N° livre N° chapitre Rév.
GE P352 1 6.1 0
COMPATIBILITY CRITERIA
GE P352 1 6.1 0
3.2.2 METHODOLOGY
The ideal solution from the safety point of view would be to group facilities involving an
equivalent hazard level on a separate platform. Thus, the facilities would form a group of
platforms connected by bridges the length of which would depend on safety distances
required according to the results of a quantitative risk analysis.
This solution is not realistic since installation costs incurred, for instance, as a function
of the sea water depth, would be excessive.
On the basis of these cost requirements, intermediate solutions will be adopted by the
preliminary project designer who will determine the optimum number of supports.
Then, safety requirements must be taken into account to adjust the respective position
of platforms and/or of facilities borne by platforms.
a. Facilities
All the sets indicated in table 1 form three areas, or dissociable parts.
Area 1 - Abbreviation Z.P. (Well Area)
Type 1 set is mainly represented by drilling (including ancillary facilities) and/or
well heads.
Derrick forming an obstacle to airplane navigation
Area widely open for active protection through external means.
Area 2 - Abbreviation Z.T. (Process Area)
Represented by sets 2, 4 and 5A, oil and gas processing units.
Obstacles: cranes, turbine stacks.
The flare, either permanent or not, represents the most likely potential ignition point.
It is an obstacle to airplane and maritime navigation (isolated structure).
Area 3 - Abbreviation U.Q. (Utility, Living Quarters)
GE P352 1 6.1 0
b. Environment
Meteorological and marine characteristics, mainly the wind conditions, i.e. direction
and velocity (V < 2 m/s or = V > 2 m/s), direction of the fair current and of swell.
c. Ignition/spread
The location of hot points should be upwind facilities involving a flammable gas
and/or liquid release hazard (see section 3.1.3.). A position at right angle in relation
to the facilities is recommended for the flare.
However, facilities with a perpendicular position to prevailing wind is acceptable.
d. Evacuation
Prevailing wind and fair current should be taken into account for the location of
evacuation facilities with a view to remove boats as far as possible from hazardous
facilities (well area in particular).
Considering that boats are very sensitive to wind action, this last criterion will take
precedence over current in most cases.
Motor boat located with stem towards the open sea, at right angle with the platform
or in an angle of the platform.
e. Collision
Wind and swell are the main factors concerning collision hazard in case of
presence of ships which cannot manoeuvre or of ships dragging their anchors.
In order to minimize this hazard, facilities should present a minimum surface to the
prevailing wind, and the same rule is applicable to ships which come alongside to
serve facilities.
f. Air service
As a rule, helicopters land or take off into the wind. Cross-wind landing is
possible, but in this case, the load and wind velocity limit access to the
helideck.
The angle of the approach (usually 210 °) should be free of any obstacle higher
than helideck level over a 1 km radius.
Obstacles which are usually met are:
flares, ignited or not,
turbine and heat engine exhaust (turbulence and lift reduction),
radio masts, drilling derricks, cranes (boom excluded, in the opposite case
procedures are implemented during helicopter motions).
GE 2 - Rév.4 - F/ANG
GE P352 1 6.1 0
Each layout project will be submitted to examination of the above mentioned safety
principles.
The most suitable layout will be that for which no negative issue will be found after
studying each criterion separately.
Note:
A study made within the scope of the COBO contract is attached for information as
Appendix 2.
ZP = Well area
GE 2 - Rév.4 - F/ANG
DOCUMENT GUIDE / Guide Document
Sce émetteur N° livre N° chapitre Rév.
GE P352 1 6.1 0
.
O
.
= Flare (direction of the flame)
= Lifeboat (or rafts)
H = Helideck
= Tendering or semisubmersible
= Jack-up platform
GE P352 1 6.1 0
1. IGNITION / SPREAD
UQ ZT ZP
ο UQ UQ
PREVAILING
WIND
ð ZT ο ο ZT
O ZP ZP
ZP ZT UQ
*
N N A
GE P352 1 6.1 0
2. EVACUATION
Ship drifting towards the well area and/or the flare should be prevented.
UQ ZT ZP
UQ UQ
o
PREVAILING
WIND ð ZT o o ZT
o ZP ZP
ZP ZT UQ
A P
P
GE 2 - Rév.4 - F/ANG
DOCUMENT GUIDE / Guide Document
Sce émetteur N° livre N° chapitre Rév.
GE P352 1 6.1 0
3. HELICOPTER APPROACH
UQ N
H ZT ZP
H ZP
o UQ
PREVAILING
WIND ð ZT o o ZT
o ZP
H UQ
ZP ZT
H P P
UQ
A
Obstruction area
GE 2 - Rév.4 - F/ANG
DOCUMENT GUIDE / Guide Document
Sce émetteur N° livre N° chapitre Rév.
GE P352 1 6.1 0
4. COLLISION
P
•••
UQ ZT ZP
ο
UQ ZP
ð ο ο
•
•
PREVAILING ZT ZT
•
WIND
•
ο ZP UQ
ZP ZT UQ
A
P
P
•
•••
GE 2 - Rév.4 - F/ANG
DOCUMENT GUIDE / Guide Document
Sce émetteur N° livre N° chapitre Rév.
GE P352 1 6.1 0
UQ ZT ZP
ο UQ ZP
PREVAILING
WIND ð ZT ο ο ZT
ο ZP N UQ
ZP ZT UQ
N
P
GE 2 - Rév.4 - F/ANG
DOCUMENT GUIDE / Guide Document
Sce émetteur N° livre N° chapitre Rév.
GE P352 1 6.1 0
b. Jack-up platform
UQ ZT ZP
ο UQ ZP
PREVAILING
WIND ð ZT ο ο ZT
A ο ZP P P UQ
ZP ZT UQ
GE 2 - Rév.4 - F/ANG
DOCUMENT GUIDE / Guide Document
Sce émetteur N° livre N° chapitre Rév.
GE P352 1 6.1 0
APPENDIX 1
(later)
GE 2 - Rév.4 - F/ANG
DOCUMENT GUIDE / Guide Document
Sce émetteur N° livre N° chapitre Rév.
GE P352 1 6.1 0
APPENDIX 2
(The master copy of this document is available in the Safety and Environmental Department)
GE 2 - Rév.4 - F/ANG
DOCUMENT GUIDE / Guide Document
Sce émetteur N° livre N° chapitre Rév.
GE P352 1 6.1 0
APPENDIX 3
Study carried out within the scope of COB P1 contract for ELF Exploration ANGOLA
(The master copy of this document is available in the Safety and Environmental Department)
GE 2 - Rév.4 - F/ANG