Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
PROJECT
Name –
Class - XII
School –
CERTIFICATE
___________________
CHEMISTRY TEACHER
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
____________
Student Name
CONTENTS
AIM
PREFACE
INTRODUCTON
THEORY
REQUIREMENTS
PROCEDURE
OBSERVATONS
RESULT
PRECAUTIONS
BIBLEOGRAPHY
AIM
1. Dove 8 ml 16 ml 11’42”
2. Lux 8 ml 16 ml 3’28”
3. Detol 8 ml 16 ml 5’10”
4. Santoor 8 ml 16 ml 15’32”
5. Cinthol 8 ml 16 ml 9’40”
RESULT
The cleansing capacity of the soaps taken is
in the order: Santoor > Dove > Cinthol >
Detol > Lux
From this experiment, we can infer that
Santoor has the highest foaming capacity, in
other words, highest cleaning capacity. Lux,
on the other hand is found to have taken the
least amount of time for the disappearance of
foam produced and thus is said to be having
the least foaming capacity and cleansing
capacity. Test for hardness in water Test for
Ca2+ and Mg2+ salts in the water supplied
Test for Ca2+ in water H2O +NH4Cl +
NH4OH + (NH4)2CO3 No precipitate Test for
Mg2+ in water H2O +NH4Cl + NH4OH +
(NH4)3PO4 No precipitate The tests show
negative results for the presence of the salts
causing hardness in water. The water used
does not contain salts of Ca2+ and Mg2+.
The tap water provided is soft and thus, the
experimental results and values hold good for
distilled water and tap water.
PRECAUTIONS
GOOGLE.COM
WIKIPEDIA.COM
THANK
YOU