Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Many across the Globe Are Dissatisfied With How Democracy Is Working
A woman shows her inked finger after voting in a village near Srinagar, India.
Anger at political elites, economic dissatisfaction and anxiety about rapid social changes
has fueled political upheaval in regions around the world in recent years. Anti-
establishment leaders, parties and movements have emerged on both the right and left
of the political spectrum, in some cases challenging fundamental norms and institutions
of liberal democracy. Organizations from Freedom House to the Economist Intelligence
Unit to V-Dem have documented global declines in the health of democracy.
As previous Pew Research Center surveys have illustrated, ideas at the core of liberal
democracy remain popular among global publics, but commitment to democracy can
nonetheless be weak. Multiple factors contribute to this lack of commitment, including
perceptions about how well democracy is functioning. And as findings from a new Pew
Research Center survey show, views about the performance of democratic systems are
decidedly negative in many nations. Across 27 countries polled, a median of 51% are
dissatisfied with how democracy is working in their country; just 45% are satisfied.
Assessments of how well democracy is working vary considerably across nations. In
Europe, for example, more than six-in-ten Swedes and Dutch are satisfied with the
current state of democracy, while large majorities in Italy, Spain and Greece are
dissatisfied.
To better understand the discontent many feel with democracy, we asked people in the
27 nations studied about a variety of economic, political, social and security issues. The
results highlight some key areas of public frustration: Most believe elections bring little
change, that politicians are corrupt and out of touch and that courts do not treat people
fairly. On the other hand, people are more positive about how well their countries
protect free expression, provide economic opportunity and ensure public safety.
We also asked respondents about other topics, such as the state of the economy,
immigration and attitudes toward major political parties. And in Europe, we included
additional questions about immigrants and refugees, as well as opinions about the
European Union.
Bivariate and multilevel regression analyses show that, among the factors studied,
dissatisfaction with democracy is related to economic frustration, the status of individual
rights, as well as perceptions that political elites are corrupt and do not care about
average citizens. Additionally, in Europe the results suggest that dissatisfaction with the
way democracy is working is tied to views about the EU, opinions about whether
immigrants are adopting national customs and attitudes toward populist parties.
Reference
Many across the Globe Are Dissatisfied With How Democracy Is Working. (2019, April
29). Pew Research center. Retrived from pewresearch. org. https://www. pewsearch.
Org/global/many-across-the-globe-are-dissatisfied-with-how-democracy-is-working/
Summary
of the state have the opportunity to vote on issues directly or send someone that they
elect to make those decisions on their behalf. It is a governing structure where rule
comes from the people instead of the military or state. Every people have their own
perspective about Democracy. Most believe elections bring little change, that politicians
are corrupt and out of touch and that courts do not treat people fairly. On the other
hand, people are more positive about how well their countries protect free expression,
economic frustration, the status of individual rights, as well as perceptions that political
elites are corrupt and do not care about average citizens. It is important to take note that
political systems have their own downsides, and people have different views about them
Reaction
Now many believe that a democracy is the best form of government that is available
today because it gives each person the freedom to have a voice. The advantages and
can be abused under the right set of circumstances. Democracy is a type of political
system that requires a popular vote to take place to elect the leader of the country and
other officials. Simply put, the leaders are chosen by the people. But by weighing their
advantages and disadvantages, which in this case is democracy, you can come up with
democracy depends not only on the rules and procedures of democratic processes but
Positive Impact
World/Global Economy: Democracies usually grow faster economically than other forms
of government. The freedom offered in the structures of democracy allows the general
population to seek any result they want. Although legal barriers exist to prevent one
person from hurting another, this governing structure grants the freedom to look for
different employment opportunities, schools, or even places to live. The choice remains
with your voice. You get an opportunity to seek what you are enthusiastic about in this
life. The structure of democracy makes it possible for everyone to stay fruitful with their
work because they are always employing their strengths. That is why the gross
larger.
Philippines: Everyone has the chance to participate. As long as you are eligible to vote,
then you get to participate in a representative democracy. Sometimes people feel like
their votes don’t count, especially if they find themselves in a minority position most of
the time, but the ability to participate in the elections is not compromised. If you can
vote, then you are making your opinion be heard, entails the active participation of
people, of “people power” in a very positive way because it results to real change in the
Local Community: The structures of democracy are unique because they allow
everyone to fight for the things that they want in life. Each person can pursue their
dreams, working to mold society in a vision that meets their expectations. Even when
that idea runs counter to what the majority wants or falls outside of an expected window
of morality, there is an ability to express those ideas assuming that others are not hurt
by such an effort. That is why there is more loyalty and patriotism present in democracy.
Even when there is disagreement in the community, everyone still has the common
ground of their nation to fall back upon when forming their identity. Everyone contributes
in their own way, which this governing structure celebrates. Other governments can
Negative Impact
or through a preferred representative on the issues that the government must manage.
people will educate themselves on each issue to offer an experienced opinion, there is
no requirement to go through all of this work. Someone can turn in a ballot that is a
straight-party ticket with no consideration about the individual views or needs. 4. The
voice of the people technically ends with the election. Once a representative is elected,
the voice that people have in their government is technically over. People can still write
their elected officials, make appointments to speak with them, or confront them at town
hall meetings, but they have no control over how the vote will actually be.
Philippines: Negative freedom implies freedom from oppression. Simply put, it is the
“right to protest”. We can explain this by pointing out that democracy makes, or at least
because the people hold them accountable. But the weakness of Philippine democracy
is something that I see in the inconsistent image of a corrupt politician who endorses an
anti-corruption book. Protests can effect some change in the public lives of people, but
unless people become real contributors to their well-being, change is but a dream,
guided by their “duty of civility”, will work to ensure that development becomes the
priority of their national and local leaders. The streets can be the battle ground for such.
But beyond such and in a very positive way, the academe, research institutions, and
private corporations can contribute to advance the welfare of people more than the
parliamentary of the streets. The EDSA People Power of 1986 is a classic case for
negative democracy. After two decades, it has become apparent that the event has not
in office.
Local Community:
It focuses on the majority only. In a representative democracy, minority groups are only
given enough air time to have their issues heard so that a vote can be obtained. In
many ways, minority groups are left to solve their own problems in this structure of
government because they do not have the voting power to overwhelm the majority.
Most people work to retain what they have after it is earned. That is why families keep
and politicians do their best to stay in power. Democracies put structures into place to
limit the impact of one person on the overall society, but it was not always that way.