Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
For the past few years, there had been a growing concern on global warming.
People now are concerned on the environmental issues of emissions and the limitations
of energy resources, most of these an effect caused by their own doings. This increase
limitations of energy resources has resulted in extensive research into novel technologies
potential application in the direct conversion of waste-heat energy into electrical power
where it is unnecessary to consider the cost of the thermal energy input. The application
electrical power can also improve the overall efficiencies of energy conversion systems
(Ismail, 2008).
generate electricity from heat directly. Nations the world over are actively searching for
heat will be moved through the module from one side to the other. One module face,
therefore, will be cooled while the opposite face is simultaneously heated. It is important
to note that this phenomenon may be reversed whereby a change in the polarity (plus
direction. Consequently, a thermoelectric module may be used for both heating and
cooling thereby making it highly suitable for precise temperature control applications. A
thermoelectric module can also be used for power generation. In this mode, a
Thermoelectric energy harvesting may one day eliminate the need for replacing batteries
or double the battery’s life in applications such as remote sensor networks or mobile
devices. Particularly, attractive is the ability to generate energy from waste heat that
When we utilize any gadget, or means of comfort we know that these devices
consume energy. But the energy is not utilized by devices. Some of the energy is lost in
the form of friction or heat. All computers require electricity to function, and some
computer components require more electricity than others. As electricity passes across
circuits and through wires, it meets a natural degree of resistance. This resistance, like
the friction of two hands rapidly rubbing together, creates heat. Some components, like
LED lights, only require a small amount of electricity to function and their heat output is
negligible. Other components, the Central Processing Unit (CPU) and Graphics Processing
Unit (GPU), require considerably more electrical input. Moreover, the amount of electricity
noticeable amount of waste heat. It is also noticeable that after long hours of using a
laptop the underneath surface of the laptop is very hot. The underneath surface of a
laptop being hot while using it proves that as a laptop is being used it generates heat.
Knowing this, it challenged the researchers to create a device that would make
generate electricity from a laptop’s generated waste heat to increase its own battery life.
This device if proven to be significant, will be a promising new way of doubling a laptop’s
batter life and may potentially help in our current energy and environmental problems by
powering millions of laptops by means of clean energy production from waste heat rather
than making use of our current means of producing electricity which are harmful to the
environment since currently, much of our electricity comes from burning coal in power
With these, the researchers decided to create the study entitled, “Waste Heat
from Laptops as Source of Thermoelectric Energy to Increase its Battery Life” which
aims to answer the following questions: What is the efficiency of using waste heat from
the laptop to generate electricity in terms of its power output (in watts)?; Is the
electricity generated by the waste heat sufficient enough to be able to charge the
laptop? and is there a significant difference between using waste heat from the laptop to
increase its battery life and using its conventional charger in terms of the time it takes
laptop to be fully charged? Hence, base from these problems, the researchers
hypothesized the following: Using waste heat from laptop to generate electricity is not
efficient in terms of power output (in watts); The electricity generated by the waste heat
is not sufficient enough to be able to charge the laptop and that there is no significant
difference between using waste heat from the laptop to increase its battery life and
using its conventional charger in terms of the time it takes for the battery percentage of
the laptop to increase by 1% and the time it takes for the laptop to be fully charged.
This study was conducted at Dagupan City National High School from January
2018 to the end of May 2018. This study will be confined to making use of waste heat
from laptops to produce thermoelectric energy to increase its battery life only.
METHODOLOGY
Procedure
The block diagram will be sketched to make an initial insight on how the
All materials that will be gathered both initial and additional will be
assembly.
The researchers will carefully follow the steps provided with the parts for
bottom of the laptop where heat will be released. The seebeck effect will be
𝑋1 − 𝑋2
𝑡𝑜𝑏𝑡 =
𝑆2 𝑆2
√ 1+ 2
𝑛1 𝑛2
Where:
𝑡𝑜𝑏𝑡 = obtained t
Temperature in Co
Trial Power Output (in
Cold Hot Watts)
Difference
Side Side
1 22 C 58 C 36 C 2.8 W
2 16 C 60 C 44 C 3.4 W
3 14 C 56 C 42 C 3.2 W
Table 1 shows the power output of a single thermoelectric module (Model: TEC1-
average power output of a single module by the total of modules used, it is to be expected
that it will produce a total of 31.3 W, which was then tested by the researchers and the
Temperature in Co
Trial Power Output (in
Cold Hot Watts)
Difference
Side Side
1 20 C 58 C 38 C 23 W
2 19 C 65 C 46 C 29 W
3 18 C 63 C 45 C 26 W
Group Mean 19 C 62 C 43 C 26 W
Table 2, shows the power output of the assembled thermoelectric modules device
difference of 43 C. The average power output of the device is 5.3 W less than what is
0 (Drained battery) 0%
1 27%
2 54%
3 81%
4 100%
Average Increase Per
27% per hour
Hour
its conventional charger is shown. The laptop was first drained to 0% before it was
charged. In the first hour of charging, the increase was 27%. From the first to second
hour, it was 27%. From the second to third hour it was also 27% and in 4 hours, the
laptop was fully charged. Calculating the average increase per hour, the rate of increase
0 (Drained battery) 0%
1 15%
2 39%
3 65%
4 87%
Average Increase Per
24% per hour
Hour
In Table 4, the average increase of battery percentage of the laptop per hour using
tbe thermoelectric modules device is shown. The laptop was first drained to 0% before it
was charged. In the first hour of charging, the increase was 15%. From the first to second
hour, it was 24%. From the second to third hour it was 26%. In the third to fourth hour,
it was 22%. In 20 more minutes, the laptop was fully charged. Calculating the average
increase per hour, the rate of increase is 24% per hour using the thermoelectric modules
device.
2 30% 22%
3 29% 24%
4 31% 20%
conventional charger in increase in the laptop’s battery power percentage. The researches
conducted a total of 4 trials, the 1st trial’s results shown on the table 3 and 4. In 4 trials,
the conventional charger gave an average increase rate of 29.5% while the thermoelectric
modules device gave 22.5%. The results show that the conventional charger was faster
Table 6 shows the results of t-Test between applied to this study. The t-tabular
value, 3, si greater than the t-critical value, 2.35 which means that we reject the null
hypothesis, thus, there is a significant difference between using the conventional charger
of a laptop and using the thermoelectric modules device in terms of the rate of increase
in batter power percentage and charging time. It also shows that the power generated
by the waste heat harvested by the thermoelectric module is sufficient enough to be able
Based on the findings, the researchers concluded that the waste heat from laptop
It was also shown that although it is enough, the charging time is less than that of using
the laptop’s conventional charger in terms of the rate of increase of battery percentage
and the total time it takes for the laptop to fully charge.
Based from the conclusion, the researchers recommend that future studies develop
a more efficient design in using thermoelectric modules to harvest waste heat from
source, such as using the module to power other devices that draws less power.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228637825_Thermoelectric_Power_Ge
neration_Using_Waste-Heat_Energy_as_an_Alternative_Green_Technology
from https://thermal.ferrotec.com/technology/
http://education.seattlepi.com/electricity-affect-environment-6590.html
from http://energy4me.org/all-about-energy/energy-challengess/
from http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/waste-heat-to-electricity/
Waste Heat Could Double Battery Life on Laptops, Cell Phones. (2016). AENews.
news.info/waste-heat-battery-life-laptops-cell-phones/
Stanford, MIT scientists find new way to harness waste heat . (2016). Stanford
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/may/waste-heat-battery-052114.html
szzzzzzzz33
Testing of Device
The researchers would like to extend their deepest gratitude and appreciation to
the following whose given their generous time and have unconditionally played a big part
First of all, to the dearest Almighty God, for giving them the patience,wisdom,
knowledge and strength to overcome the challenges that they experienced, and
also for the vision He had gave them to be able to create this masterpiece.
understanding and encouragements; and who allowed the researchers to go into different
To Mrs. Myla DG. Mejia, their mentor, who guided them throughout the research
process and for the advices and thoughts and for correcting and editing their manuscript.
To Mrs. Milanie M. Flores, their project adviser, who gave his full support and time
Thank you so much. Godspeed and GodBless! To Him all be the Glory!
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: