Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
EXPIREMENT #: 1
DISCUSSION:
The purpose of this laboratory exercises is to have the student become acquainted
with the material testing laboratory, the equipment available, and requirements of the course.
PREPARATORY READING
PROCEDURE
1. Under the guidance of the staff member, visit the laboratory & observe where general
equipment is located.
3. Make a list of the major types of equipment available. Note the units of calibration &
the dial divisions.
Make a Report that includes:
1. A guide to the laboratory with the major features indicated the sketch.
2. A brief description of each major testing machine & equipment’s. This should include
where appropriate, the factor necessary to convert the calibration units to the correct
SI units.
1. metal pail/bucket
A bucket is typically
a watertight, vertical
cylinder or truncated
cone or square, with
an open top and a flat
bottom, attached to a
semicircular carrying
handle called the bail
A bucket is usually
an open-top
container. In
contrast, a pail can
have a top or lid and
is a shipping
container. In
common usage, the
two terms are often
used interchangeably.
Also it is used for
carrying and holding
things like aggregates
and liquids.
2. Set of sieves
A sieve, or sifter, is a
device for separating
wanted elements
from unwanted
material or for
characterizing the
particle size
distribution of a
sample of
aggregates , Sand ,
and other soil
particles. Sieve
analysis helps to
determine the
particle size
Page |3
distribution of the
coarse and fine
aggregates. This is
done by sieving the
aggregates as per IS:
2386 (Part I) – 1963.
In this we use
different sieves as
standardized by the
IS code and then pass
aggregates through
them and thus collect
different sized
particles left over
different sieves.
3. Calculator
A calculator is a
device that performs
arithmetic operations
on numbers. The
simplest calculators
can do only addition,
subtraction,
multiplication, and
division. More
sophisticated
calculators can
handle exponent ial
operations, roots,
logarithm s,
trigonometric
functions, and
hyperbolic functions.
Internally, some
calculators actually
perform all of these
functions by repeated
processes of addition.
Page |4
4. Slump Cone
5. Various Moulds
A mold or mould is a
hollowed-out block that is
filled with a liquid or pliable
material such as plastic, glass,
metal, or ceramic raw material.
The liquid hardens or sets
inside the mold, adopting its
shape. A mold is the
counterpart to a cast. The very
common bi-valve molding
process uses two molds, one
for each half of the object.
Page |5
An instrument so designed
that it is capable of exerting a
tensile, compressive, or
transverse stress on a
specimen under test. Further,
it can be adapted for the
determination of Brinell
hardness, ductility, cold bend,
and other properties. The
machine consists essentially of
three systems: loading,
weighing, and indicating, the
loading being applied either
mechanically or hydraulically
Page |6
Pressure Gauge
Tamping Rod
Tamping rods are
dimensionally accurate rods
used to tamp fresh concrete
into cylinder molds and slump
cones to eliminate voids and
excess air. Measures: 5/8"
diameter x 24" length For use
with slump cones, 6" x 12"
concrete cylinder molds and
pressure meters Also available;
3/8" diameter x 12" length, 5/8"
diameter x 12" length, and
graduated 5/8" diameter x 24"
length
Thermometer
Electric Oven
Digging equipments
EXPIREMENT #: 2
DISCUSSION:
PREPARATORY READING
TESTING PROCEDURE:
SIZE OF SAMPLES
9.5 3/8 Lb Kg
12.5 ½ 10 5
19 ¾ 20 10
25 1 30 25
37.5 1½ 50 30
50 2 70 40
63 2½ 90 45
75 3 100 60
90 3½ 150 65
OBSERVATIONS:
The field samples of aggregate must generally be reduced to an appropriate size for testing
to determine physical characteristics, such as, sieve analysis, soundness, hardness, etc. The
methods described in this test method are intended to minimize variations in the aggregate
characteristics between the smaller test sample and the larger field sample.
CONCLUSIONS:
These methods cover the reduction of soil samples to testing size employing
techniques that are intended to minimize variation in measured characteristics between the
test samples selected and the field sample. Specifications, for aggregate require sampling
portion of the material for testing. Other factors being equal, larger samples will tend to be
more representative of the total supply. These methods for reducing the large sample
obtained in the field to a convenient size. This is for the purpose of conducting a number of
tests to describe the material and measure its quality in manner that the smaller portion is
most likely to be a representative of the field sample and thus the total supply.
P a g e | 11
DOCUMENTATION:
P a g e | 12
EXPIREMENT #: 3
DISCUSSION:
This method of test covers procedures for determining in the field. The amount of
surface moistures in fine aggregates by displacement in water. The accuracy of the method
depends upon accurate information on the bulk specific gravity of the material in a saturated
surface-dried condition. The same procedure, with appropriate changes in the size of sample
and dimensions of the container may be applied to course aggregates.
STANDARD No.:
ASTM C 70-75
ASSHTO 7-142-74
ESSETIAL EQUIPMENT and MATERIALS
1. Sample of aggregates
2. Balance
3. Flask
TESTING PROCEDURE:
1. The surface water content may be determined either by weight or volume in each cause
the test shall be made at a temperature range of 18° to 29°C (65° to 85°)
2. Determination by weight – fill the container to the mark with water and determine the
weight in grams. Empty the container and place enough water in it to cover the sample
0introduce the weighted sample of the course aggregates into the container & remove
the entrained air. Fill the container to the original mark and determined the weight in
grams calculate the amount of water displaced by the sample as follows.
Vs = Wc + Ws – W
where;
Vs = weight displaced the sample g.
P a g e | 13
Vs = V2 – V1
*where:
Vs = vokume of water displaced by the sample, ml.
V2 = combined volume of sample & water, ml.
V1 – volume of water required to cover the sample, ml.
CALCULATION:
1. Calculate the percentage of surface moisture in terms of saturated surface- dry fine
aggregate as follows.
Vd = mass of the sample (Ws) divided by the bulk specific gravity of the fine
aggregate in a saturated surface dried condition.
Vs = mass of water displaced, g.
Ws = mass of sample, g.
2. Calculate the percentage of the surface moisture in terms of dry aggregates, if the
absortio of the aggregatese is known as follows:
Pd = P[1 + (Pa/100)]
*where:
Pd = surface moisture in terms of dry fine aggregates, in percent.
Pa = adsorption of the aggregates, in percent.
P = total moisture content on dry aggregates basis, is the sum of the surface moisture
Pd, and absorption, Pa.
P a g e | 15
SOLUTION’S:
GIVEN:
Wc = 598 g GIVEN:
Ws = 226 g
W = 723 g Wc = 598 g
Ws = 226 g / 9.81 = 23.04g
FORMULA: Vs = 101 g / 9.81 = 10.30g
Vs = Wc + Ws – W FORMULA:
P = [(Vs-Vd) / (Ws-Vs)] x
CALCULATION: 100%
CALCULATION:
Vs = 598g + 226g – 723g
Vs = 101 g P = [(10.30g-23.04g) /
(23.04-10.30g)] x 100%
GIVEN:
P = -1
V1 = 200ml
V2 = 300ml
GIVEN:
FORMULA:
Wc = 598 g
Vs = V2 – V1 Ws = 226 g / 9.81 = 23.04g
Vs = 101 g / 9.81 = 10.30g
CALCULATION:
FORMULA:
Vs = 300ml – 200ml
Vs = 100 ml Pd = P[1 + (Pa/100)]
CALCULATION:
P = [(10.30g-23.04g) /
(23.04-10.30g)] x 100%
P = -1
P a g e | 16
DOCUMENTATION:
OBSERVATIONS:
Our observation on This method of test covers procedures for determining the
percentage of surface moisture in aggregate samples by water displacement. The measurement
of the moisture content of aggregate in the field must be quick, reasonably accurate and must
require only simple apparatus which can be easily handled and used in the field.
CONCLUSIONS:
EXPIREMENT #: 4
DISCUSSION:
STANDARD No.:
ASTM C 136-76
ASSHTO 24-74
ESSETIAL EQUIPMENT and MATERIALS
1. Set of Sieves
2. Containers
TESTING PROCEDURE:
3) Place the weighted aggregates in the top of the sieve stack and cover with lid. Properly
secure the sieves in the mechanical shaker and turn on the shaker for five minutes. In case
of the absence of mechanical shaker, shake the stack of sieves with your hands continuously
for the same time.
4) Weight the materials that are retained on each of the sieves. Including the weight
retained on the pan, and record in the data sheet. If the sum of these weights are not within
1 percent of the original sample weight, the procedure should be repeated. Otherwise, use
the sum of the weight retained to calculate the percentage on each sieve.
5) Compute the cumulative percent retained, and the percent passing each sieve.
P a g e | 18
6) Plot the gradation curves for the coarse and fine aggregates from the experiment on the
graph provided. Plot the specified gradation curves for the coarse and fine aggregates to be
specified by the laboratory instructor. Plot the combine grading curve using 40% coarse
aggregates and 60% fine aggregates.
SIEVE SIZES
U.S. Standards
1 ½” 1.5
1” 1
¾” 0.75
½” 0.50
3/8” 0.375
No. 4 0.187
No. 8 0.0937
2 20
1½ 15
1 10
¾ 5
½ 2
3/8 1
EXPIREMENT DATA:
DATA 1:
DATA 2:
DOCUMENTATION:
P a g e | 20
OBSERVATIONS:
Sieve analysis is the operation of dividing the aggregate into various fractions, each
consisting of particles of same size. The experiment has been performed successfully and the
fineness modulus of different samples have been calculated which are shown in tabular form
above.
CONCLUSIONS:
Based on the experiment, sieving process is one of the method to determine the
size of particles. Ensure that all material entrapped within the openings of the sieve are
cleaned out and included in the weight retained. This may be done using brushes to gently
dislodge entrapped materials
P a g e | 21
EXPIREMENT #: 5
DISCUSSION:
The unit weight of aggregate is usually expressed in pounds per cubic foot. Unit
weight of aggregate is significant in that it gives a measure of the voids in a unit volume of
aggregate. The voids of aggregate depend upon many factors, among them are size, shape and
surface texture of aggregates, graduation, moisture content, and compaction. For general
information and for comparison of different aggregates, the standard conditions used in
determining the unit weight are dry and compact.
STANDARD No.:
ASTM C 29-78
ASSHTO T 19-74
1. Tamping rod
2. Volume measure
3. Scale
TESTING PROCEDURE:
CALCULATION:
V=LxWxH
MSSD = ( G – T )( 1 + A/100)/V
*where; MSSD = the rodded unit weight of the saturated dry
aggregates, kg/cu. m. (lb/cu. ft.)
G = combined mass of the oven-dry aggregates and the bucket, kg (lb)
T = mass of the bucket alone, kg (lbf)
V = volume of the bucket, cu. m. (cu. ft.)
A = % absorption, determine by ASTM method C 127
SOLUTION’S:
L = 52.2 cm GIVEN:
W = 15 cm
H = 15.5 cm G = 44kg
T = 1kg
FORMULA: V = 121.37 cu. m.
V=LxWxH FORMULA:
V = 52.2 x 15 x 15.5
V = 12,136.5 cu. cm. MSSD = ( G – T )( 1 + A/100)/V
MSSD = ( 44 – 1 )( 1 +
CONVERT cu.cm. to cu.m; 0/100)/121.37
MSSD = 3.54 kN/cu. m.
V = 12,136.5 cm^3 x ( 1m/100cm)^3
DOCUMENTATION:
P a g e | 23
OBSERVATIONS:
This experiment was made in order to create a uniform sample. This test
method is often used to determine bulk density values that are necessary for use for many
methods of selecting proportions for concrete mixtures. This is very useful during a cement
production process. Experiment shows how much the bulk density (unit weight) and
percentage of voids within aggregate are. For better strength less void is desired for cement.
Whenever size of aggregate increases void percentage and volume increases steadily. As a
space within aggregate increases less strength occurs at cement.
CONCLUSIONS:
Aggregate is the mainly used in concrete. Test clearly shows that compacted
aggregate provides better cement strength. Bulk density values used for many methods of
selecting proportions for concrete mixtures. Bulk density values can also be used as
economical means like purchase agreements.
P a g e | 24
EXPIREMENT #: 6
DISCUSSION:
Basically, specific gravity is the ratio of the weight of a given volume of material to the
weight of an equal volume of water. However, there are several variations of this definition
upon the material and purpose for which the volume of the specific gravity is to be used in
concrete work, the term specific gravity customarily refers to the density of the individual
aggregate in a saturated surface dry condition (SSD) the bulk (oven-dry) specific gravity and
apparent specific gravity are used to a less degree. Solid unit weight, in pound per cubic foot
(pcf) of an aggregate is customarily defined as the specific gravity times 62.4 pcf.
STANDARD NO.:
ASTM C 127-77
AASHTO T 85-74
TESTING PROCEDURES:
1. Soak coarse aggregate under water for 24 hours (done for you try laboratory
instructions)
2. Obtain approximately 5 kg of saturated course aggregate (retained o0n 3/8 sieve)
3. Towel the aggregate to the saturated surface dry condition (SSD)
4. Measure SSD weight (B) of aggregate in air to the nearest 1 gm. Do this quickly.
P a g e | 25
5. Place a sample in a wire mesh basket and determine its weight in water. Be sure to
subtract the submerged weight of the basket from the total.
6. Place wet aggregate in oven and dry to constant weight (A) leave the aggregate in
oven overnight.
7. From the above data (i.e. A:B and C) calculate three types of specific gravity and
absorption as define below.
1.) Apparent specific gravity = A/A-C
2.) Bulk specific gravity (-SSD) = B/B-C
3.) Bulk specific gravity (DRY) = A/B-C
4.) Absorption percent = B-C/ A X 100
DATA:
CALCULATIONS:
DIAGRAM:
OBSERVATION:
CONCLUSION:
Current standard test methods for determining the specific gravity and water
absorption of coarse and fine aggregate are AASHTO T 85 and AASHTO T 84, respectively.
There are also several modified and new test methods for determining these procedures for
determining the SSD state in the standard test methods with more complex, costly devices.
P a g e | 27
SLUMP TEST
EXPIREMENT #: 7
DISCUSSION:
This method requires a fabricated metal with shape and dimension. To identify the
slump of the concrete mixture. And to determine the workability or consistency of concrete
mix.
STANDARD NO.:
PROCEDURE:
1.) In the concrete box mix the class AA mixture of concrete that consist of 1 bucket of
cement, 1 ½ bucket of sand, 3 bucket of gravel, and 5.5 liters of water.
2.) First, mix the bucket of sand and gravel, after mixing the two, add the bucket of
cement. Mix them all properly.
3.) Add water to the mixture until the desired thickness have achieved. By mixing the
materials properly.
4.) Place a metal sheet under the slump cone.
5.) When adding concrete in the slump cone. Add only ¾ of the height of the cone and
tamp it with a tamping rod. Redo the same procedure until the cone is full. (In
tamping tamp the rod 25 times)
6.) Remove the cone and tilt it upside down by using the meter stick compare the
height of the concrete mix and the cone. To identify if it passes the standard height.
P a g e | 28
DAIGRAM:
OBSERVATION:
CONCLUSION:
COMPRESSION TEST
EXPIREMENT #: 8
DISCUSSION:
STANDARD NO.:
ASTM C- 39
ASTM C- 39 M standard
1. Placing the specimen on the bearing block with its hardened face up on of the table
of the testing machine directly under the spherically seated bearing block. The
bearing blocks are cleaned and the test specimen is placed on the lower bearing
block.
2. Zero verification and blocks seating prior to testing the specimen., it is verified that
the load indicator is set to zero. If the indicator is not properly set to zero, it is
adjusted.
3. Rate of loading the load is applied continuously add without shock.
4. Standards specify that for testing machines of the screw type, the moving head
shall travel at a rate of approximately 0.05 in. (1mm)/ min when the machine is
running idle. While for hydraulically operated machines, the load shall be applied
at a rate of movement corresponding to a loading rate on the specimen within the
range of 20 to 50 psi/ sec. (0.15 to 0.36 MPa/ sec.)
5. During the application of the first half of the anticipated loading phase, a higher
rate of loading is allowed.
P a g e | 30
6. No adjustment is made in the rate of movement of the platen at any time while a
specimen is yielding rapidly immediately before failure.
7. Load is applied until the specimen fails. And the maximum load carried by the
specimen. During the test is recorded. The type of failure and the appearance of the
concrete are also noted.
LOAD kN
(sq.mm.)
200
7 5625 172.75 9.78 150
14 5625 190.64 10.79 100
COMPUTATIONS:
DIAGRAM:
P a g e | 31
OBSERVATION:
It states in the procedure that when the cone is removed, it should be lifted up vertically,
without any rotational movement at all.
CONCLUSION:
In this test materials that are going to be used should be good and also the
mixing of concrete plays a vital part in the process of the compression test thus resulting to
good results.
P a g e | 32
EXPIREMENT #: 9
OBJECTIVES;
Tensile testing also known as tension testing, is a fundamental material science and
engineering test in which a sample is subjected to a controlled tension until failure. Using the
tensile or tension test method.
MATERIALS X EQUIPMENTS:
DIAGRAM:
OBSERVATION:
The material testing strength using the tensile or tension test method. It Involves
applying an ever increasing load to a test sample up to the point of failure.
CONCLUSION:
Therefore, yield strength is the stress at which time permanent deformation or yielding
is observed to begin. Using the tensile of tension relating to the amount that something can
stretch or be stretched without breaking.
P a g e | 34
EXPIREMENT #: 10
DISCUSSION:
STANDARD No.:
ASTM D 143-83
D 198-84
1. Testing Machine
2. Load Indicator
3. Bearing blocks
4. Compressometer
TESTING PROCEDURE:
1. Measure the cross section and length of the specimen to the nearest 0.01 in.
Record the dimensions of the specimen.
3. Apply the load continuously until the specimen fails. Record the maximum
load.
COMPUTATION
Sc = Total Load
Area of Bearing
P a g e | 35
FOR PINE
70
LOAD kN
40
(sq.mm.) (MPa)
30
1 1520 45.86 30.17
20
10
2 1520 49.17 32.35
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
TIME (s)
3 1520 63.12 41.53 FOR MAHONGANY
90
80
70
TRIAL CROSS- MAX. COMPRE
SECTION LOAD SSION LOAD kN 60
20
2 2646 92.45 34.94
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
3 1936 66.51 34.35
70
60
50
LOAD kN
40
30
20
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
TIME (s)
DIAGRAM:
COMPUTATIONS:
Material Area Max load
Pine
45.86×103 𝑁
1 1520mm2 45.86KN 𝑆= = 30.17 MPa
1520 𝑚𝑚2
49.17×103 𝑁
2 1520mm2 49.17KN 𝑆= = 32.35 MPa
1520 𝑚𝑚2
63.12×103 𝑁
3 1520mm2 63.12KN 𝑆= = 41.53 MPa
1520 𝑚𝑚2
Mahogany
49.17×103 𝑁
1 2544mm2 81.43KN 𝑆= = 32.01 MPa
2544 𝑚𝑚2
49.17×103 𝑁
2 2646mm2 92.43KN 𝑆= = 34.94 MPa
2646 𝑚𝑚2
P a g e | 37
49.17×103 𝑁
3 1936mm2 66.505KN 𝑆= = 34.35 MPa
1936 𝑚𝑚2
Coconut
48.28×103 𝑁
1 2400mm2 48.28KN 𝑆= = 20.12 MPa
2400 𝑚𝑚2
45.83×103 𝑁
2 2400mm2 45.83KN 𝑆= = 19.20 MPa
2400 𝑚𝑚2
59.96×103 𝑁
3 2400mm2 59.96KN 𝑆= = 24.98 MPa
2400 𝑚𝑚2
OBSERVATIONS:
A simple compressive load is applied to a specimen, the following types of
deformation may take place; elastic or plastic shortening in ductile materials, crushing and
fracture in brittle materials, a sudden bending deformation called buckling in long slender
bars, or combinations of these.
CONCLUSIONS
By the results of the analysis of variance was verified statistical equivalence
between the modulus of elasticity of both wood species, revealing, for the specimens tested,
not significant position of dial gauges in the calculation of the modulus of elasticity. As the
wood an anisotropic material (orthotropic), the results obtained in this study cannot be
extrapolated to the same wood species or different species, implying the use of dial gauges in
two different positions in the specimen, enabling assess equivalence or not of the elastic
moduli obtained.
P a g e | 38
EXPIREMENT #: 11
DISCUSSION:
Compression Machine
CHB (Concrete Hollow Block) (4” & 6”)
TESTING PROCEDURE:
2. Apply the compression load slowly on the plywood until failure is attained.
COMPUTATION:
80
TRIAL CROSS- MAX. COMPRE
70
SECTION LOAD SSION
AL AREA (kN) STRESS 60
(sq.mm.) (MPa)
LOAD Kn
50
30
10
3 2400 55.42 2.31
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
TIME (s)
(sq.mm.) (MPa) 70
50
30
3 23493.36 25 0.75 20
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
TIME (s)
P a g e | 40
DIAGRAM:
OBSERVATIONS:
Our observation on this experiment, we first prepared the materials needed for this
particular experiment. On our first hollow block it got destroyed after putting too much load
because the wood doesn’t have the same length with the specimen which is why the pressure
is not properly distributed.
CONCLUSIONS
It is better to use high-quality blocks materials. Therefore, I conclude that the
concrete hollow block compressive strength depends on the materials used to create the
hollow.