Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

Journal of

Pressure Vessel
Technology Technical Briefs

Modernization of Pressure Vessel standard, the decision was made to perform a clean sheet rewrite.
By doing so, it was felt that not only could the standard be mod-
Design Codes ASME Section ernized with regard to the latest technical advances in pressure
vessel construction but it could be structured in a way to make it
VIII, Division 2, 2007 Edition more user friendly for both users and the committees that maintain
it.
T. P. Pastor
P.E. Development Process
HSB Global Standards, Traditionally, the development of new standards by ASME is
Hartford, CT carried out by volunteers who populate the different committees
responsible for any given standard. The last major standard devel-
D. A. Osage oped in this way was Sec. VIII, Division 3, which took nearly
P.E. 15 years to complete. Recognizing that the user community may
The Equity Engineering Group, Inc., not have the patience to wait 15 or more years for this needed
Shaker Heights, OH 44122 update to Sec. VIII, Division 2, ASME decided to use an outside
organization to develop the first draft of the new standard. The
project was awarded to the Pressure Vessel Research Council
共PVRC兲, who in turn formed the Task Group on Continued Mod-
The technology for pressure equipment design continues to ad- ernization of Codes to oversee the development of the new ASME
vance each and every day. The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Sec. VIII, Division 2 code. PVRC has utilized professionals with
Code has been keeping pace with these advances over the last 92 both engineering and technical writing expertise to develop new
years. As far back as the 1960s, it was recognized that the special technology and the initial drafts of the new VIII-2.
requirements for design of pressure vessels operating at pressures A Steering Committee made up of ASME Sec. VIII members
over 2000 psi (13.7 MPa) called for special rules, and ASME was formed to provide technical oversight and direction to the
issued Sec. VIII, Division 2 of Alternative Rules for Pressure Ves- development team with the goal of facilitating the eventual bal-
sels. Since that time, the understanding of failure mechanisms and loting and approval process. ASME also hired a Project Manager
advances in material science, nondestructive testing, and 共PM兲 to manage all of the activities required to bring this new
computer-aided design has progressed to the stage where a new standard to publication. Some of the PM’s responsibilities in-
approach was needed not only in the content of design codes but cluded the following:
in the way they are presented and organized. This paper intro-
duces the newly issued ASME Sec. VIII, Division 2 of 2007 edition • coordinating balloting process to Subcommittees and Boiler
and explores the technical concepts included and the new format and Pressure Vessel 共BPV兲 Standards Committee
designed for ease of use. Included are results of test exercises • addressing accreditation issues relative to a possible overlap
sponsored by ASME giving actual applications of the new Code of the old and new VIII-2
for design of vessels. This paper demonstrates ASME’s commit- • managing validation of all equations, and overseeing devel-
ment to provide manufacturers and users of pressure equipment opment of an example manual
with the most up-to-date technology in easy to use standards that • coordinating beta testing of the standard
service the international market. 关DOI: 10.1115/1.2794737兴 • arranging presentation forums during the ballot process, and
• working with ASME publication to prepare the first edition
of the new standard

Introduction The project began with the development of a detailed table of


contents containing every paragraph heading that would appear in
In 1998, the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Committee au-
the new standard, and identifying the source for the content that
thorized a project to rewrite Sec. VIII, Division 2 of Pressure
would be placed in this paragraph. In preparing such a detailed
Vessel Code. This decision was made shortly after the design mar-
table of contents, the lead authors were able to quickly identify
gin on ultimate tensile strength was lowered from 4.0 to 3.5 in
areas where major development effort was required to produce
Secs. I and VIII, Division 1 共VIII-1兲. ASME saw the need to
updated rules. A list of some of the new technology produced for
update Sec. VIII, Division 2 共VIII-2兲 to be more competitive with
the VIII-2 rewrite includes the following:
other international standards, and in lieu of revising the existing
• toughness requirements
• material procurement table
Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication
in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received July 26, 2007;
• design by rule for the creep range
final manuscript received September 14, 2007. Review conducted by G. E. Otto • conical transition reinforcement requirements
Widera. • opening reinforcement rules

754 / Vol. 129, NOVEMBER 2007 Copyright © 2007 by ASME Transactions of the ASME

Downloaded 29 Oct 2007 to 165.243.101.136. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright, see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
• local strain criteria for design by analysis using elastic- ture and design temperature, for design temperatures below
plastic analysis the creep range. This aligns the new VIII-2 with current
• limit load and plastic collapse analysis for multiple loading European pressure vessel standards.
conditions • Allowable stresses are provided for design in the creep
• fatigue design for welded joints based on structural stress range using the allowable stress criteria of Sec. VIII, Divi-
method, and sion 1.
• UT in lieu of RT for examination • The toughness rules were updated and the minimum Charpy
V-Notch impact test requirement was set to 27 J 共20 ft lb兲.
Organization of New Code In addition, impact test exemption curves for carbon and
low alloy steel are now provided with and without the in-
Overview. The organization of the new VIII-2 is very different fluence of PWHT. Finally, the option to establish the design
from the current standard, utilizing a flat modular structure to MDMT using fracture mechanics methodology has been
facilitate future revisions and additions. The standard is made up added.
of nine parts. • A master stress-strain curve has been developed, which uti-
lizes MSYS, MSUTS, and elastic modulus functions to in-
• Part 1: General Requirements troduce temperature dependence. This stress-strain curve is
• Part 2: Responsibilities and Duties
used when applying the design-by-analysis rules of Part 5,
• Part 3: Material Requirements
as well as when performing buckling calculations when it is
• Part 4: Design-by-Rule Requirements
necessary to determine the tangent modulus.
• Part 5: Design-by-Analysis Requirements
• Two sets of design fatigue curves are provided:
• Part 6: Fabrication Requirements
• Part 7: Inspection and Examination Requirements 1. smooth bar design fatigue curves using the same design
• Part 8: Pressure Testing Requirements methodology as presented in Appendix 5 of the current
• Part 9: Pressure Vessel Overpressure Protection VIII-2, and
2. welded joint design fatigue curves utilizing the new mas-
In addition to these nine parts, normative and informative an- ter S/N curve and the structural stress method for deter-
nexes are utilized within each part, eliminating the use of manda- mining the equivalent structural stress.
tory and nonmandatory appendixes that are traditionally placed in
the back of the standard. Part 4: Design-By-Rule Requirements. The VIII-2 rewrite
will contain both design-by-rule and design-by-analysis options.
Part 1: General Requirements. Part 1 addresses the scope of Numerous enhancements were made to the design-by-rule proce-
the standard with respect to the types of pressure vessels covered, dures in Part 4, several of which are highlighted below.
as well as the definition of the geometric boundary for the
stamped item. In addition, this part covers units of measurement, • A new format was introduced to present the design rules in
reference standards, technical inquiries, and global definitions. a manner to enhance readability and facilitate computer
Similar to other ASME BPV standards, US Customary, Système implementation of the required calculations.
Internationale 共SI兲, or local customary units may be used to dem- • Weld joint efficiencies are introduced in the VIII-2 rewrite
onstrate compliance with the standard. Guidance for the use of US permitting for the first time less than 100% volumetric ex-
Customary and SI units is also provided. amination for main vessel welds.
• Design by rule for the creep range is provided.
Part 2: Responsibilities and Duties. Part 2 consolidates re-
• Introduction of explicit design rules for combined loadings
sponsibilities and duties of the user, Manufacturer, and Authorized
共i.e., pressure, weight, wind, and earthquake兲, as well as
inspector. The most significant change in this area has to do with
adoption of the ASCE 7-2002 Load Combination Method-
Registered Professional Engineer 共RPE兲 certification of the Manu-
ology.
facturers Design Report 共MDR兲 and the Users Design Specifica-
• New design rules for cylindrical shells, spherical shells and
tion 共UDS兲. An alternative to RPE certification is provided, which
heads, ellipsoidal heads, and torispherical heads.
will facilitate the use of the new VIII-2 outside of North America.
• External pressure rules based on Code Case 2286 and uti-
This alternative will require that the engineer certifying either the
lizing the tangent modulus derived from the master stress-
UDS or MDR has the requisite technical and legal stature, and
strain curve given in Part 3.
jurisdictional authority to certify such a document.
• New opening reinforcement rules based on pressure-area
One other significant change concerns maintenance of records.
The Manufacturer needs to supply to the user the complete tech- stress calculation.
nical file containing all pertinent documentation related to the • New rules for conical transition subject to internal/external
construction of the vessel, as well as retain these records for a pressure.
minimum period of 3 years after the vessel is stamped. Some of • Inclusion of design rules for layered vessels.
the records that must be retained by the Manufacturer are the • Inclusion of design rules for stayed construction, jacketed
following: vessels, noncircular vessels, and vessel supports.
• Inclusion of bellows and tube sheet design rules based on
• users design specification Part UHX from VIII-1.
• manufacturers design report
• manufacturers data report, and Part 5: Design-By-Analysis Requirements. Part 5, the design-
• manufacturers construction records, including welding pro- by-analysis section, was reorganized based on the mode of failure
cedure specifications, procedure qualification records, as follows:
records of all heat treatments, results of all production test • protection against plastic collapse
plates, NDE procedures, results of all NDE examinations, • protection against local failure
etc. • protection against collapse from buckling, and
Part 3: Material Requirements. Part 3 contains several sig- • protection against failure due to cyclic loading
nificant enhancements relative to the existing VIII-2.
Another significant change is that the minimum wall thickness can
• The allowable stress basis is set to the minimum of UTS/2.4 be established using design-by-analysis rules in lieu of the design-
at room temperature, and YS/1.5 at both the room tempera- by-rule requirements in Part 4. This is a significant departure from

Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology NOVEMBER 2007, Vol. 129 / 755

Downloaded 29 Oct 2007 to 165.243.101.136. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright, see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
the philosophy that exists in the current VIII-2. protection in Part 9 are virtually identical to that currently pub-
Some other enhancements to Part 5 are shown below. lished in VIII-1. For this reason, most rules for overpressure pro-
tection in the new VIII-2 will reference VIII-1. Rules not covered
• Continued use of stress classification and the Hopper dia- in VIII-1, such as Overpressure Protection by Design 共Code Case
gram. 2211兲, will be presented in Part 9. An annex covering best prac-
• Introduction of structural stress concepts that provide a new tices for the installation and operation of pressure relief devices,
fundamental method to compute membrane and bending which is based on the latest revision to Appendix M of VIII-1, is
stresses using finite element analysis 共FEA兲 that is mesh also provided.
insensitive. This structural stress method is also used when
performing a fatigue analysis of welded joints.
• New procedure for elastic-plastic design using FEA and the
master stress-strain curve. Additional Development Steps
• New requirements for design based on local failure strain Overview. As stated earlier, in many respects, the development
using the master stress-strain curve, replacing the existing of this new Sec. VIII, Division 2 broke new ground for ASME,
limits on triaxiality. from subcontracting the writing of the first draft to an outside
• Explicit design-by-analysis procedures for evaluating col- organization, to publishing the document in single column and
lapse from buckling including knock-down factor for shell formatting it to satisfy ISO guidelines. But, there were two other
imperfections. activities undertaken during this project to assure the highest qual-
• New method for fatigue assessment based on structural ity for the first edition: These were validation of all design rules
stress concepts for assessment of welded joints. and beta testing of the document.
• Normative annexes covering recommendations for lineariza-
tion of stress results from FEA used in stress classification, Design Validation. The new VIII-2 contains hundreds of equa-
design of perforated plates based on elastic stress analysis, tions and polynomial expressions for curve fits used in the design
and rules for experimental stress analysis are provided. rules. Even where rules were taken from Sec. VIII, Division 1, in
most cases, they were rewritten to facilitate computerization of the
Part 6: Fabrication Requirements. Part 6 contains a consoli- rules. The net result was that to quality check each equation, fig-
dation of fabrication requirements from the original VIII-2 Part ure, and polynomial factor was a major undertaking such that if
AM and Part AF, as well as some fabrication rules from VIII-1. committee volunteers were asked to perform this work, it would
Similar PWHT requirements are planned for the initial release; have delayed publication of the document. Instead, an indepen-
however, new time-temperature-thickness criterion for PWHT is dent organization experienced in writing pressure vessel design
under development. software was contracted to quality assurance 共QA兲 check all de-
Part 7: Examination Requirements. Rules for examination of sign rules in the new VIII-2. They performed this work by pro-
welded joints have been completely rewritten in Part 7. The con- graming all of the design rules in MATHCAD®, and running numer-
cept of defining “examination groups” for pressure vessels, based ous examples. Wherever possible, existing examples from the old
on the practice used in several European standards, has been uti- VIII-2 and VIII-1 were used for the validation work. In all, over a
lized. Also with the introduction of weld joint efficiencies in the thousand pages of calculations were performed, and the process
new VIII-2, the option for partial radiography is now available. did identify some errors, mostly in the equations used to model
However, unlike the spot RT rules of VIII-1 where 1% of a weld design curves. This validation work will also serve as the starting
joint is examined, when permitted in Part 7, the partial radiogra- point for an examples manual to be developed for a future publi-
phy rules will require between 10% and 25% of the weld to be cation.
examined. Beta Testing. The Division 2 project team set forth a number of
Other significant features of Part 7 include the following: goals with the undertaking of this project, and everyone involved
• Provision for UT in lieu of RT; requirements are given re- was interested in receiving feedback from users of Sec. VIII, Di-
garding when manual versus automated UT shall be per- vision 2. Normally, this feedback would be received once the
formed. standard is published and used for production vessels; however, a
• More extensive visual examination requirements. test run prior to publication was required. To accomplish this,
• For vessels for which the fatigue analysis is mandatory, all ASME authorized a project to beta test the standard during the last
surfaces of pressure boundary components 共internal and ex- stages of approval. Invitations to participate in a beta test of the
ternal兲 shall be examined by MT or PT following a hydro- new standard were sent to several existing Division 2 Certificate
static pressure test; this requirement is taken from Sec. VIII, Holders. These Manufacturers were asked to select a recently
Division 3, KE-400. completed Division 2 vessel, and re-execute the project on paper
• Part 7 also contains a normative annex outlining Inspector using the new standard. A large number of companies responded
and Manufacturer duties for inspection and examination. to the invitation with a description of a vessel to be used in the
evaluation.
Part 8: Pressure Testing Requirements. The hydrostatic test The Subcommittee VIII Technical Steering Committee re-
pressure in Part 8 is now set in accordance with Eq. 共1兲; this is viewed the different proposals and made their selections to assure
now in alignment with the PED. that a diverse group of vessels were represented. The beta testers

冋 冉 冊册
were asked to provide feedback in the following areas:
ST
PT = max 1.43 ⫻ MAWP,1.25 ⫻ MAWP ⫻ 共1兲 • overall ease of use of the standard
S • change in wall thickness for main vessel components
The ratio ST / S in Eq. 共1兲 is the lowest ratio for the pressure- • change in vessel weight reported as a percentage change
boundary materials, excluding bolting materials, of which the ves- • change in welding, PWHT, and NDE costs
sel is constructed. • change in production schedule reported as a percentage
The pneumatic pressure test option is retained. However, when • change in overall vessel cost reported as a percentage
used, the vessel must be monitored by acoustic emission exami- • perform a fatigue analysis utilizing new structural stress
nation during the test. Finally, the Manufacturer must maintain method
complete records of the final pressure test. • general observations, including reporting any problems with
understanding the requirements of the code, missing or in-
Part 9: Overpressure Protection. Basic rules for overpressure correct references, etc.

756 / Vol. 129, NOVEMBER 2007 Transactions of the ASME

Downloaded 29 Oct 2007 to 165.243.101.136. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright, see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Table 1 Summary of beta test results: steam superheater. Table 3 Summary of beta test results: hydroprocessing reac-
Comments: „1… The new code provides a systematic approach tor. Comments: „1… The beta test has confirmed the quality of
to design with easy access to information. „2… The use of tables the new code. „2… The revised design margins and related in-
and figures instead of graphs leads to better and precise re- creased allowable stresses for some materials will result in sig-
sults. „3… The new format adopted is user friendly as it takes nificant savings in both time and cost.
less time to find reference pages. „4… The design method for
openings and reinforcement provides a substantial decrease in Item Shell Heads
hub thickness. „5… New code includes and accepts techniques
such as TOFD, phased array, which is a welcome change and Material SA-336 F22V SA-542 Tp D Cl 4a
will lead to definite improvements in quality and testing. Design temperature 共°C兲 454 454
Allowable stress-old 共MPa兲 169 169
Allowable stress-new 共MPa兲 199 199
Item Shell Heads Required thickness-old 共mm兲 290 145
Required thickness-new 共mm兲 244 125
Material SA-387 Gr11 Cl 2 SA-387 Gr11 Cl 2 Change in vessel weight as a %
Design temperature 共°C兲 410 410 −13.8
Allowable stress-old 共MPa兲 151.38 151.38 Reduction in production time 2 weeks
Allowable stress-new 共MPa兲 151.38 151.38 Reduction in overall vessel cost −12
Required thickness-old 共mm兲 34.38 38.43 as a %
Required thickness-new 共mm兲 34.59 33
Change in vessel weight as a % −2
Reduction in production time N/A
as a %
Reduction in overall vessel cost −2.5
as a % Summary
The majority of the goals outlined in 1999 for the rewrite of
Sec. VIII, Division 2 have been satisfied in the draft approved by
the ASME BPV Standards Committee in February 2007. A com-
pletely new and more user-friendly organizational structure to the
Beta Test Results. Overall, the beta test of this new standard book coupled with adoption of the latest technology available for
was a resounding success and provided validation of many of the construction of pressure vessels will hopefully result in a standard
goals set forth when this project was initiated. In general, the that will serve the refining and petrochemical for decades to come.
results are as follows. Ongoing activities related to the project include beta testing by
• All of the beta testers reported the standard was easy to use, existing VIII-2 Certificate Holders, addressing accreditation is-
and that the design rules were clear and concise. sues, and preparation of a separate Examples Manual.
• Several beta testers reported that they prefer the new format
of the document whereby the nomenclature, figures, and
tables are all placed at the end of each part and that all of the
weld joint figures are assembled in one place. Table 4 Summary of beta test results: hydrotreating reactor.
• The beta test generated numerous questions on the standard, Comments: „1… New VIII-2 Code shows the requirements in de-
but no significant errors in the standard were identified dur- tail for each item; therefore, confusion with Code interpreta-
ing the test. tions will be reduced. „2… Examination requirements for the ma-
• As expected, significant cost savings were reported due to terial are more severe. The cost and delivery impact for the
the increase in allowable stress for many carbon and low material will be increased when purchasing the materials.
alloy steels. Of equal importance, most of the testers also Item Shell Heads
reported a reduced amount of reinforcement required for
openings, resulting in a reduction in forged nozzle thickness. Material SA-542 Type D Cl SA-542 Type D Cl
• A summary of the beta test results is provided in Tables 1–5. 4a 4a
Design temperature 共°C兲 454 454
Allowable stress-old 共MPa兲 168 168
Allowable stress-new 共MPa兲 199.8 199.8
Required thickness-old 共mm兲 167 95
Required thickness-new 共mm兲 141 81
Change in vessel weight as a % −14
Reduction in production time −4
Table 2 Summary of beta test results: 53 ft diameter sphere. as a %
Comments: „1… Overall, the new Sec. VIII, Div. 2 code was found Reduction in overall vessel cost −8
to be well organized and logical in its layout. The equations are as a %
located near the text where they are referenced and this re-
duces the time spent looking for the applicable equation. „2…
Having the NDE requirements summarized in a table is very Table 5 Summary of beta test results: hydroprocessing
helpful as are the diagrams and sketches of the welds. „3… The reactor
opening reinforcement design method is logical and intuitive.
Item Shell Heads
Item Shell Forging
Material SA-336M F22V SA-542M Gr D Cl
Material SA-738 Gr B SA-387 Gr11 Cl 2 4a
Design temperature 共°C兲 120 120 Design temperature 共°C兲 454 454
Allowable stress-old 共MPa兲 195 148.9 Allowable stress-old 共MPa兲 168 168
Allowable stress-new 共MPa兲 244 148.9 Allowable stress-new 共MPa兲 199.8 199.8
Required thickness-old 共mm兲 42.74 N/A Required thickness-old 共mm兲 304 152
Required thickness-new 共mm兲 33 N/A Required thickness-new 共mm兲 254 128
Change in vessel weight 共kg兲 −51,000 Change in vessel weight as a % −17
Reduction in production time −8 Reduction in production time −1
as a % as a %
Reduction in overall vessel cost −12.2 Reduction in overall vessel cost N/A
as a % as a %

Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology NOVEMBER 2007, Vol. 129 / 757

Downloaded 29 Oct 2007 to 165.243.101.136. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright, see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
The new Sec. VIII, Division 2 共2007 edition兲 will be published P␶ ⫽ the required hydrotest pressure
on July 1, 2007, and will become mandatory January 1, 2008. A S ⫽ the allowable stress at the design temperature
code case has been approved 共Code Case 2575兲 that will allow for ST ⫽ the allowable stress at the hydrotest
an 18 month transition period during which VIII-2 Certificate temperature
Holders will be able to construct to either the old VIII-2 共2004 UTS ⫽ the ultimate tensile strength
edition through 2006 addenda兲 or the new VIII-2. YS ⫽ is the yield strength

Nomenclature
MAWP ⫽ the maximum allowable working pressure

758 / Vol. 129, NOVEMBER 2007 Transactions of the ASME

Downloaded 29 Oct 2007 to 165.243.101.136. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright, see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm

Вам также может понравиться