Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 110

Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 1 of 31 PageID #: 2294

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

SHURE INCORPORATED, )
)
and ) C.A. NO. 19-1343-RGA-CJB
)
SHURE ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC., ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
v. )
)
CLEARONE, INC., )
)
Defendant. )

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs Shure Incorporated and Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc. (collectively,

“Shure”), by counsel and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a), 15(a)(2), and 15(d),

hereby allege the following in support of their Second Amended Complaint against Defendant

ClearOne, Inc. (“ClearOne”):

NATURE OF THE ACTION

1. Healthy competition is a cornerstone of the economy. But that competition must

be fair. When Shure first pioneered the design of a ceiling array microphone, offering powerful

acoustic benefits with flexible mounting options and minimal aesthetic drawbacks in rooms

where it would be implemented, Shure built an entire new product market. Shure’s MXA910

product, part of the Microflex Advance (MXA) family of products, was and continues to be very

popular with customers because of its many innovative features and distinctive design. In

recognition of the MXA910’s inventive features, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued to

Shure U.S. Patent No. 9,565,493 (the “’493 Patent”) (Exhibit A). Similarly, in recognition of

Shure’s innovative design, the USPTO issued to Shure U.S. Patent No. D865723 (the ’723

-1-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 2 of 31 PageID #: 2295

Patent) (Exhibit G). ClearOne’s reaction to the success of the MXA910 was not to innovate or

fairly compete, but rather to generate its own version of the same product, the BMA CT, which

infringes the ’493 Patent and the ’723 Patent. In an effort to induce customers to buy ClearOne’s

BMA CT, and to deter purchases of Shure’s MXA910 products, ClearOne began a campaign of

false and misleading statements to customers. This is not fair and honest competition. It is

unlawful and has damaged Shure and its customers.

2. This civil action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et

seq., Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) et seq., the Delaware Deceptive

Trade Practices Act, 6 Del. C. § 2532 et seq., and Delaware common law, and relates to

ClearOne’s products, including ClearOne’s BMA CT product, and its deceptive trade practices.

PARTIES

3. Plaintiff Shure Incorporated is a corporation organized under the laws of Illinois

with a principal place of business at 5800 W. Touhy Avenue, Niles, Illinois 60714.

4. Plaintiff Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc. is a corporation organized under the

laws of Illinois with a principal place of business at 5800 W. Touhy Avenue, Niles, Illinois

60714. Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Shure Incorporated.

5. On information and belief, Defendant ClearOne is a corporation organized and

existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and is headquartered at 5225 Wiley Post Way,

Suite 500, Salt Lake City, Utah.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over ClearOne because, on information and

belief, ClearOne is incorporated in Delaware.

-2-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 3 of 31 PageID #: 2296

7. On information and belief, this Court also has personal jurisdiction over ClearOne

because ClearOne has established minimum contacts with the forum such that the exercise of

personal jurisdiction over ClearOne would not offend traditional notions of fair play and

substantial justice.

8. On information and belief, ClearOne has regularly and purposefully availed itself

of the privilege of conducting business activities within Delaware and this Judicial District. On

information and belief, ClearOne has purposefully availed itself of the rights and benefits of

Delaware law and has engaged in systematic and continuous contacts with Delaware. On

information and belief, ClearOne derives substantial revenue from the sale of infringing products

and/or services in Delaware and has availed itself of the privilege of conducting business within

Delaware.

9. On information and belief, personal jurisdiction is proper because ClearOne has

committed acts of infringement in this Judicial District. This Court has personal jurisdiction

over ClearOne because, inter alia, this action arises at least in part from activities ClearOne

directed towards Delaware.

10. On information and belief, ClearOne has appointed a registered agent in Delaware

at Capitol Services, Inc., 1675 S. State Street, Ste. B, Dover, Delaware 19901.

11. Exercising personal jurisdiction over ClearOne in this District would not be

unreasonable given ClearOne’s contacts in this District, the interest in this District of resolving

disputes related to products and/or services sold herein, and the harm that would occur to Shure

in this District.

12. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§§ 1331 and 1338(a) as to the claims arising under federal law, and has supplemental jurisdiction

-3-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 4 of 31 PageID #: 2297

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367 as to the claims arising under state law because they form part of

the same case and controversy as the claims arising under federal law.

13. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1391(c) because the Court has

personal jurisdiction over ClearOne in Delaware and ClearOne resides in Delaware. Venue is

proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) because ClearOne is in incorporated in Delaware and thus

resides in this Judicial District, and because, on information and belief, infringing activity has

occurred and continues to occur in this Judicial District.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

14. Shure has been a pioneer in the audio electronics industry since its founding in

1925. From its beginnings as a one-man company selling AM radio kits and components, Shure

has grown to become the worldwide standard-bearer for superior and reliable professional audio

equipment, including microphones, earphones, headphones, monitoring equipment, conference

room equipment, mixing equipment, software, and more.

15. With respect to at least some of the products Shure sells, ClearOne is a direct

competitor of Shure. Since 2017, ClearOne and Shure have been engaged in litigation involving

several patents and competing products in the Northern District of Illinois and the District of

Utah, as well as before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”).

16. On February 9, 2016, Shure publicly announced its Microflex Advance portfolio

of networked conferencing products, offering “elegant, versatile, and scalable solutions for A/V

conferencing spaces that require pristine speech intelligibility.” Exhibit B at 1. One of Shure’s

current products in this line, the MXA910, is a ceiling-mounted array microphone that performs

beamforming in a highly accurate and targeted manner, and provides a variety of flexible

mounting options while preserving room aesthetics. To protect the innovative technologies of

-4-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 5 of 31 PageID #: 2298

this product, Shure filed, among other patent applications, U.S. Patent Application No.

14/701,376 (the “’376 application”) with the United States Patent and Trademark Office

(“USPTO”) on April 30, 2015. The ’376 application subsequently issued as the ’493 Patent to

Mathew T. Abraham et al., on February 7, 2017. The ’493 Patent is titled “Array Microphone

System and Method of Assembling the Same.” A true and accurate copy of the ’493 Patent is

attached as Exhibit A. To protect the innovative design of this product, Shure filed, among other

design patent applications, U.S. Patent Application No. 29/700,875 (the “’875 application”) with

the USPTO on August 6, 2019. The ’875 application claims priority through intermediate

applications to the ’376 application. The ’875 application subsequently issued as the ’723 Patent

to Elizabeth A. Cho et al., on November 5, 2019. The ’723 Patent is titled “Array Microphone

Assembly.” A true and accurate copy of the ’723 Patent is attached as Exhibit G.

17. Shure is the owner and assignee of all rights, title, and interest in the ’493 Patent

and the ’723 Patent, and holds the right to sue and recover damages and lost profits for

infringement thereof, including current and past infringement.

18. ClearOne has had knowledge of the ’493 Patent since before the filing of this

Complaint. For example, ClearOne filed a petition for inter partes review of the ’493 Patent on

February 15, 2019. That proceeding, Case IPR2019-00683, is ongoing. Even earlier, ClearOne

submitted an Information Disclosure Statement on July 19, 2017, during prosecution of

ClearOne’s U.S. Patent Application No. 14/475,849, affirmatively identifying the ’493 Patent.

19. Despite its knowledge of the ’493 Patent, ClearOne released its BMA CT product

in 2019, which it marketed as a ceiling tile beamforming microphone array. According to

ClearOne’s website, ClearOne announced on February 25, 2019 that it had begun shipments of

-5-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 6 of 31 PageID #: 2299

the BMA CT. In doing so, ClearOne adopted technologies developed and implemented by Shure

in the MXA910 product and patented in the ’493 Patent.

20. In addition to incorporating Shure’s patented technology in its BMA CT product,

ClearOne also attempted to mislead Shure’s customers as to the availability, legitimacy, and

viability of Shure’s MXA910 product based on the ongoing litigation between the parties. Since

at least March 2019, ClearOne’s communications with more than a dozen installers and

integrators included false and misleading statements as to the status and alleged outcome of the

parties’ ongoing litigation. On information and belief, these statements were made by at least

John Schnibbe, a Regional Sales Manager for ClearOne, and were made to customers such as

installers and integrators of conferencing equipment. For example, ClearOne has falsely and

with bad faith stated, inter alia, that Shure’s MXA910 has been found to infringe ClearOne’s

patents, that two separate court rulings found that the MXA910 infringed ClearOne’s patents,

that such rulings were “unanimous,” that ClearOne had “won” its lawsuit against Shure, that the

MXA910 will soon be unavailable, that Shure will soon have to stop selling the MXA910, that

Shure was then unable to sell MXA910 products, and that integrators, installers, and/or end users

will need to tear or rip out existing installations of the MXA910. These statements are all

factually false and, on information and belief, were intentionally misleading and were made in

bad faith, and with the intent to induce customers to refrain from purchasing MXA910 products.

These false and deceptive statements harmed Shure’s business by purposefully deceiving buyers

and potential buyers of the MXA910 product, and discouraging purchases of the MXA910, as

well as other Shure products.

21. ClearOne has also attempted to mislead customers, including installers and

integrators, through written communications. For example, ClearOne’s Senior Vice President of

-6-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 7 of 31 PageID #: 2300

Finance, Narsi Narayanan, issued a letter to customers dated August 29, 2019, that purported to

summarize the effect of a preliminary injunction order that issued in the parties’ parallel N.D. Ill.

litigation. ClearOne’s letter includes the following intentionally false and misleading statements:

The Court’s infringement analysis applies equally to third parties such as


integrators and consultants. If Shure is likely infringing the ’806 Patent by
manufacturing, marketing, and selling the MXA910 product to be used in a drop-
ceiling mounting configuration, then third-party integrators are also likely
infringing the ’806 Patent if they install the MXA910 product in a drop-ceiling
mounting configuration, and third-party consultants are likely inducing
infringement if they recommend installation of the MXA910 product in a drop-
ceiling mounting configuration.

Please be aware that it is likely an act of infringement to install a Shure MXA910


product (Model Nos. MXA910B, MXA910W, MXA910AL, MXA910B-60CM,
MXA910W-60CM, and MXA910AL-60CM) in a drop-ceiling mounting
configuration. This is so regardless of when, or how, the installing company
received the MXA910 that it installs. Please also be aware that a finding of willful
patent infringement may result in the infringer having to pay treble damages
pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284.

22. These statements are false and misleading for many reasons. For example, it is

not true that all “drop-ceiling mounting configuration[s]” of the MXA910 are preliminarily

enjoined. There is no dispute, for example, that when the MXA910 is mounted to a drop-ceiling

tile or other structure, such that the microphones of the MXA910 are not in the drop space (i.e.,

they are below the track of the drop ceiling), there is no infringement. Customers are free to

install the MXA910 in this manner, and sometimes do, yet ClearOne’s letter falsely suggests that

such a use of the MXA910 is infringing and forbidden. The falsity of ClearOne’s statements in

this regard is not disputable and is not a matter of interpretation of the preliminary injunction

order. By misleading customers to think that they are at risk of infringement liability, and

possibly “willful” infringement which may lead to “treble damages,” ClearOne intentionally and

with bad faith attempted to mislead customers into ceasing purchases of the MXA910 and

instead purchasing ClearOne’s products.

-7-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 8 of 31 PageID #: 2301

23. As another example, ClearOne’s threat of “infringement” liability for customers is

highly misleading and false. In ClearOne’s operative pleading in the first N.D. Ill. action,

ClearOne asserts both direct and indirect infringement, including allegations that Shure is liable

for infringement by “customers.” Shure Inc. v. ClearOne, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-03078, Dkt. 430

¶¶ 46, 59 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 30, 2018). ClearOne is thus attempting to hold Shure wholly liable for

alleged infringement by customers. ClearOne’s allegations will either be proven incorrect or

correct, but in either scenario Shure’s customers themselves will not be liable. By intentionally

misleading customers into thinking that they will be held liable for “infringement,” and possibly

“willful” infringement with treble damages, ClearOne again misrepresents facts to customers and

evidences its bad faith behind such communications.

24. Additionally, ClearOne’s letter falsely misleads customers into thinking that there

is no permissible use of the MXA910. This is because ClearOne intentionally and in bad faith

omitted from its letter the several and significant noninfringing uses of the MXA910. Again,

there is no dispute about these noninfringing uses. ClearOne itself asserts them in the first N.D.

Ill. suit. According to ClearOne, “Shure’s MXA910 has multiple mounting options” and “even

if Shure is unable to manufacture or sell the MXA910 in a way that allows it to be installed in a

drop-ceiling mounting configuration, Shure will be able to continue to sell MXA910s for use in

other configurations.” Shure Inc. v. ClearOne, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-03078, Dkt. 567 at 6 (N.D. Ill.

Aug. 7, 2019). Despite making these admissions in the first N.D. Ill. suit on August 7, 2019,

ClearOne omitted any reference to these non-infringing uses of the MXA910 in its August 29,

2019 letter. Instead, ClearOne’s letter was designed to mislead customers into believing that

there is no non-infringing use of the MXA910, and that installing the MXA910 will lead to

infringement liability.

-8-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 9 of 31 PageID #: 2302

25. Further, ClearOne’s letter falsely and misleadingly tells customers that they may

not install the MXA910 in a drop-ceiling mounting configuration “regardless of when, or how,

the installing company received the MXA910 that it installs.” This is false and misleading for at

least two reasons. First, the preliminary injunction order does not apply to exterritorial uses of

the MXA910, as ClearOne knows, and in fact conceded in the first N.D. Ill. suit. Customers

reading the letter would falsely be misled to understand that they may not install the MXA910

outside of the United States. Further, the preliminary injunction specifically allowed that “Shure

customers that have already installed the MXA910 in a drop-ceiling mounting configuration

shall be permitted to continue using their MXA910s in that way, and Shure will be able to

continue servicing those already-installed products.” Shure Inc. v. ClearOne, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-

03078, Dkt. 551 at 64 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 5, 2019). It was false and misleading for ClearOne to omit

this specific carve-out from the preliminary injunction in its August 29, 2019 letter.

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,565,493

26. Shure realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs as though

fully restated herein.

27. The ’493 Patent is valid and enforceable.

28. The ’493 Patent addresses significant problems when deploying microphones in a

conference room setting and in other environments with background noise or multiple noise

sources. The ’493 Patent explains that existing technologies suffered from drawbacks, including

picking up unwanted sound from nearby noise sources, detecting sound from more than one

direction, and mounting complex installations to a ceiling. Exhibit A, ’493 Patent at 1:15-63.

The ’493 Patent addresses these problems by, inter alia, providing an array microphone that is

-9-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 10 of 31 PageID #: 2303

“unobtrusive, easy to install into an existing environment, and can enable the adjustment of the

microphone array to optimally detect sounds from an audio source, e.g., a human speaker, and

reject unwanted noise and reflections.” Id. at 1:64-2:3.

29. Claim 17 of the ’493 Patent recites:

17. A microphone assembly comprising:

an array microphone comprising a plurality of microphones; and

a housing configured to support the array microphone, the housing


being sized and shaped to be mountable in a drop ceiling in
place of at least one of a plurality of ceiling tiles included
in the drop ceiling,

wherein a front face of the housing includes a sound-permeable


screen having a size and shape that is substantially similar
to the at least one of the plurality of ceiling tiles.

30. ClearOne, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271, has infringed and continues to infringe

at least claims 17-20 and 23-27 of the ’493 Patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling,

and/or importing beamforming microphone arrays in the United States, including but not limited

to, the BMA CT product, without authority, either individually and/or jointly with its customers

using the BMA CT product. For example, the BMA CT product infringes each and every

element of at least claims 17-20 and 23-27 of the ’493 Patent, either literally and/or under the

doctrine of equivalents.1

31. Upon information and belief, ClearOne has distributed and continually distributes

the BMA CT product through established distribution channels throughout the United States,

including, but not limited to ClearOne’s own sales network.

1
Claims 17-20 and 23-27 are identified in this Complaint solely to provide an exemplary basis of
ClearOne’s infringement of the ’493 Patent. This listing of claims is by no means limiting, and
Shure retains all rights to supplement and/or amend its listing of asserted claims during this
action.

-10-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 11 of 31 PageID #: 2304

32. ClearOne’s acts with respect to the BMA CT product have been without license

or authority from Shure with respect to the ’493 Patent. As indicated below, ClearOne directly

infringes the ’493 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by making, using, offering to sell, selling,

and/or importing the BMA CT in the United States.

33. The BMA CT comprises a microphone assembly as recited in claim 17 of the

’493 Patent. For example, ClearOne’s literature confirms:

BMA CT, Quick-Start Guide (Rev. 2.4, Mar. 2019) at 2 (Exhibit C).

BMA CT, Datasheet (Rev. 2.0, 2019) at 1 (Exhibit D).

-11-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 12 of 31 PageID #: 2305

BMA CT Specifications, http://www.clearone.com/bma-ct (Exhibit E).

34. The BMA CT includes an array microphone comprising a plurality of

microphones as recited in claim 17 of the ’493 Patent. For example:

BMA CT, Quick-Start Guide (Rev. 2.4, Mar. 2019) at 2 (Exhibit C).

-12-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 13 of 31 PageID #: 2306

BMA CT Product Overview, http://www.clearone.com/bma-ct (Exhibit F).

BMA CT, Quick-Start Guide (Rev. 2.4, Mar. 2019) at 9 (Exhibit C).

35. The BMA CT includes a housing configured to support the array microphone, the

housing being sized and shaped to be mountable in a drop ceiling in place of at least one of a

plurality of ceiling tiles included in the drop ceiling as recited in claim 17 of the ’493 Patent. For

example:

BMA CT, Datasheet (Rev. 2.0, 2019) at 1 (Exhibit D).

-13-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 14 of 31 PageID #: 2307

BMA CT, Datasheet (Rev. 2.0, 2019) at 1 (Exhibit D).

BMA CT, Datasheet (Rev. 2.0, 2019) at 1 (Exhibit D).

-14-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 15 of 31 PageID #: 2308

BMA CT, Quick-Start Guide (Rev. 2.4, Mar. 2019) at 11 (Exhibit C).

36. The housing of the BMA CT includes a front face with a sound-permeable screen

having a size and shape that is substantially similar to the at least one of the plurality of ceiling

tiles as recited in claim 17 of the ’493 Patent. For example:

BMA CT, Datasheet (Rev. 2.0, 2019) at 1 (Exhibit D).

-15-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 16 of 31 PageID #: 2309

BMA CT, Quick-Start Guide (Rev. 2.4, Mar. 2019) at 1 (Exhibit C).

37. In violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), ClearOne actively and knowingly induces

third-party retailers, distributors, integrators, installers, and end-users of the BMA CT product to

directly infringe claims 17-20 and 23-27 of the ’493 Patent. ClearOne induces infringement, at

least, by knowingly selling the BMA CT product with the intent that its customers directly

infringe the ’493 Patent through sales and use of the BMA CT product in the United States. As

discussed above, ClearOne has been aware of the ’493 Patent since before this Complaint was

filed, and on information and belief knows that the BMA CT infringes at least claims 17-20 and

23-27 of the ’493 Patent.

38. ClearOne has contributed to the infringement of, and continues to contribute to

the infringement of, one or more claims of the ’493 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(c), either

literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by selling, offering to sell, and/or importing

within or into the United States the BMA CT product. These instrumentalities constitute a

-16-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 17 of 31 PageID #: 2310

material part of the invention of the ’493 Patent, are known by ClearOne to be especially made

or adapted for use in infringing the ’493 Patent, and are not a staple article or commodity of

commerce suitable for substantial noninfringing use.

39. Despite ClearOne’s knowledge of the ’493 Patent and knowledge of its infringing

activities, ClearOne has and continues to willfully and deliberately infringe one or more claims

of the ’493 Patent by continuing to manufacture, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the BMA

CT product in the United States. As the above summary of ClearOne’s infringement of claim 17

of the ’493 Patent makes clear, ClearOne’s infringement is obvious and notorious. On

information and belief, ClearOne has no good faith basis that the BMA CT does not infringe the

’493 Patent. ClearOne’s decision to challenge the ’493 Patent in inter partes review, as noted

above, further underscores its knowledge that it infringes the ’493 Patent. This willful

infringement, without regard for Shure’s lawful patent rights, constitutes egregious and wanton

conduct sufficient to establish willful infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 284.

40. By reason of the ongoing and continuous infringement by ClearOne of the ’493

Patent, Shure is entitled to the entry of a permanent injunction, enjoining ClearOne from further

infringing of Shure’s patent rights, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283.

41. Shure has suffered, and is continuing to suffer, damages as a result of ClearOne’s

infringement of the ’493 Patent, and Shure is entitled to compensation and other monetary relief

to the fullest extent allowed by law, including attorneys’ fees, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 284 and

285.

-17-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 18 of 31 PageID #: 2311

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

FALSE ADVERTISING UNDER THE LANHAM ACT

42. Shure realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs as though

fully restated herein.

43. As described above, on information and belief, ClearOne through one or more of

its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, licensees, and/or persons acting in concert or

active participation with ClearOne or on its behalf, including but not limited to John Schnibbe,

engaged in false, deceptive and/or misleading advertising and promotion to Shure’s customers

and potential customers related to Shure’s products, including at least installers and integrators of

conferencing equipment. On information and belief, this advertising and promotion was

conducted in bad faith and included at least false representations that Shure’s MXA910 has been

found to infringe ClearOne’s patents, that two separate court rulings found that the MXA910

infringed ClearOne’s patents, that such rulings were “unanimous,” that ClearOne had “won” its

lawsuit against Shure, that the MXA910 will soon be unavailable, that Shure will soon have to

stop selling the MXA910, that Shure was then unable to sell MXA910 products, and that

integrators, installers and/or end users will need to tear or rip out existing installations of the

MXA910.

44. These false and misleading statements were made by ClearOne in connection with

goods and services, including in connection with the MXA910 and the BMA CT. Both products

are sold in interstate commerce in the United States.

45. On information and belief, ClearOne’s false, deceptive, and/or misleading

advertising and promotion has caused injury to Shure in the form of lost sales, commercial

interest, loss of reputation, lost employee time, and legal expenses.

-18-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 19 of 31 PageID #: 2312

46. On information and belief, Shure’s injuries flowed directly from the deception

wrought by ClearOne’s false, deceptive, and/or misleading advertising and promotion. On

information and belief, Shure’s customers and potential customers withheld purchasing products

and services from Shure, including purchases of the MXA910, based on ClearOne’s statements.

47. ClearOne’s acts alleged herein constitute false advertising in violation of Section

43(a)(1)(B) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B).

48. As a direct, proximate, and foreseeable result of ClearOne’s actions, Shure has

suffered, and unless ClearOne’s actions are enjoined by this Court, will continue to suffer,

irreparable harm.

49. As a direct and proximate result of ClearOne’s conduct, Shure has suffered and

will continue to suffer damages in an amount to be proved at trial.

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

VIOLATION OF DELAWARE DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT

50. Shure realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs as though

fully restated herein.

51. On information and belief, ClearOne through one or more of its officers,

directors, agents, servants, employees, licensees, and/or persons acting in concert or active

participation with ClearOne or on its behalf, including but not limited to John Schnibbe and

Narsi Narayanan, made false, deceptive and/or misleading statements to Shure’s customers and

potential customers related to Shure’s products, including at least installers and integrators of

conferencing equipment. On information and belief, these statements were made in bad faith,

and include at least false representations that Shure’s MXA910 has been found to infringe

ClearOne’s patents, that two separate court rulings found that the MXA910 infringed ClearOne’s

-19-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 20 of 31 PageID #: 2313

patents, that such rulings were “unanimous,” that ClearOne had “won” its lawsuit against Shure,

that the MXA910 will soon be unavailable, that Shure will soon have to stop selling the

MXA910, that Shure was then unable to sell MXA910 products, and that integrators, installers

and/or end users will need to tear or rip out existing installations of the MXA910. These false

statements made in bad faith also include misrepresentations of fact and omissions of material

facts in the August 29, 2019 letter from Narsi Narayanan to customers of ClearOne and Shure, as

set forth above.

52. On information and belief, ClearOne’s false, deceptive, and/or misleading

conduct led to injury to Shure by deceiving or having the tendency to deceive customers from

engaging in business with Shure, reducing Shure’s commercial interest, harming its reputation,

and causing lost sales. ClearOne’s deceptive statements were material to customers’ purchasing

decisions, by design, because they addressed the availability, legitimacy, and viability of the

MXA910 to Shure’s customers and potential customers.

53. On information and belief, Shure’s injuries flow directly from the deception

wrought by ClearOne’s false, deceptive, and/or misleading statements. On information and

belief Shure’s customers and potential customers have withheld purchasing products and

services from Shure, including purchases of the MXA910 based on ClearOne’s statements.

54. ClearOne’s acts alleged herein constitute unfair competition in violation of the

Delaware Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 6 Del. C. § 2532. For example, ClearOne’s false and

misleading statements violate at least 6 Del. C. § 2532(a)(2), (5), (8), and (12).

55. As a direct, proximate, and foreseeable result of ClearOne’s actions, Shure has

suffered, and unless ClearOne’s actions are enjoined by this Court, will continue to suffer,

irreparable harm.

-20-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 21 of 31 PageID #: 2314

56. As a direct and proximate result of ClearOne’s conduct, Shure has suffered and

will continue to suffer damages in an amount to be proved at trial, and Shure is entitled to

compensation and other monetary relief to the fullest extent allowed by law, pursuant to

6 Del. C. § 2533(a), including attorneys’ fees, costs, and enhanced damages under 6 Del. C.

§ 2533(b), (c).

FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION

TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH BUSINESS RELATIONS

57. Shure realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs as though

fully restated herein.

58. On information and belief, ClearOne through one or more of its officers,

directors, agents, servants, employees, licensees, and/or persons acting in concert or active

participation with ClearOne or on its behalf, including but not limited to John Schnibbe and

Narsi Narayanan, made false, deceptive and/or misleading statements to Shure’s customers and

potential customers related to Shure’s products, including at least installers and integrators of

conferencing equipment. On information and belief, these statements were made in bad faith,

and include at least false representations that Shure’s MXA910 has been found to infringe

ClearOne’s patents, that two separate court rulings found that the MXA910 infringed ClearOne’s

patents, that such rulings were “unanimous,” that ClearOne had “won” its lawsuit against Shure,

that the MXA910 will soon be unavailable, that Shure will soon have to stop selling the

MXA910, that Shure was then unable to sell MXA910 products, and that integrators, installers

and/or end users will need to tear or rip out existing installations of the MXA910. These false

statements made in bad faith also include misrepresentations of fact and omissions of material

-21-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 22 of 31 PageID #: 2315

facts in the August 29, 2019 letter from Narsi Narayanan to customers of ClearOne and Shure, as

set forth above.

59. On information and belief, Shure had reasonable probabilities of new and

continuing business opportunities with its customers, which were deterred and interfered with by

ClearOne’s false, deceptive, and/or misleading statements. As described above, ClearOne’s

conduct has caused Shure customers to withhold trade with Shure involving the MXA910.

60. On information and belief, ClearOne’s false, deceptive, and/or misleading

statements were intentional and directed to harm Shure’s business opportunities with current and

potential customers. The false, deceptive, and/or misleading statements by ClearOne are the

cause of the interference with Shure’s business relationships with customers.

61. On information and belief, ClearOne’s false, deceptive, and/or misleading

statements led to a likelihood of, and realization of, actual damages to Shure in the form of lost

sales, commercial interest, loss of reputation, lost employee time, and legal expenses.

62. ClearOne’s acts alleged herein constitute tortious interference with business

relations under Delaware law. As a direct, proximate, and foreseeable result of ClearOne’s

actions, Shure has suffered, and unless ClearOne’s actions are enjoined by this Court, will

continue to suffer, irreparable harm.

63. As a direct and proximate result of ClearOne’s conduct, Shure has suffered and

will continue to suffer damages in an amount to be proved at trial.

FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

UNFAIR COMPETITION UNDER DELAWARE COMMON LAW

64. Shure realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs as though

fully restated herein.

-22-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 23 of 31 PageID #: 2316

65. On information and belief, ClearOne through one or more of its officers,

directors, agents, servants, employees, licensees, and/or persons acting in concert or active

participation with ClearOne or on its behalf, including but not limited to John Schnibbe and

Narsi Narayanan, made false, deceptive and/or misleading statements to Shure’s customers and

potential customers related to Shure’s products, including at least installers and integrators of

conferencing equipment. On information and belief, these statements were made in bad faith,

and include at least false representations that Shure’s MXA910 has been found to infringe

ClearOne’s patents, that two separate court rulings found that the MXA910 infringed ClearOne’s

patents, that such rulings were “unanimous,” that ClearOne had “won” its lawsuit against Shure,

that the MXA910 will soon be unavailable, that Shure will soon have to stop selling the

MXA910, that Shure was then unable to sell MXA910 products, and that integrators, installers

and/or end users will need to tear or rip out existing installations of the MXA910. These false

statements made in bad faith also include misrepresentations of fact and omissions of material

facts in the August 29, 2019 letter from Narsi Narayanan to customers of ClearOne and Shure, as

set forth above.

66. On information and belief, Shure had reasonable expectancies of entering valid

business relationships with installers and integrators, with which ClearOne wrongfully interfered

and continues to interfere, and ClearOne has thereby defeated and continues to attempt to defeat

Shure’s legitimate expectancies, thus causing Shure harm. ClearOne’s wrongful interference

includes the false, deceptive, and/or misleading statements described above. ClearOne’s conduct

has caused Shure customers to withhold trade with Shure involving the MXA910.

67. On information and belief, ClearOne’s false, deceptive, and/or misleading

statements were intentional and directed to harm Shure’s business expectancies with current and

-23-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 24 of 31 PageID #: 2317

potential customers. The false, deceptive, and/or misleading statements by ClearOne are the

cause of the interference with Shure’s legitimate expectancies.

68. On information and belief, ClearOne’s false, deceptive, and/or misleading

statements led to a likelihood of, and realization of, actual damages to Shure in the form of lost

sales, commercial interest, loss of reputation, lost employee time, and legal expenses.

69. ClearOne’s acts alleged herein constitute unfair competition under Delaware

common law. As a direct, proximate, and foreseeable result of ClearOne’s actions, Shure has

suffered, and unless ClearOne’s actions are enjoined by this Court, will continue to suffer,

irreparable harm.

70. As a direct and proximate result of ClearOne’s conduct, Shure has suffered and

will continue to suffer damages in an amount to be proved at trial.

SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION

INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. D865723

71. Shure realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs as though

fully restated herein.

72. The ’723 Patent is valid and enforceable.

73. The ’723 Patent claims a new, original, and ornamental design for Array

Microphone Assembly, as shown in the figures of the patent, reproduced below, as shown in

Exhibit G, with the broken lines of even length shown in the figures forming no part of the

claimed design:

-24-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 25 of 31 PageID #: 2318

Fig. 1, Front, top, right perspective view Fig. 2., Rear, bottom, left perspective view

Fig. 3, Top plan view Fig. 4, Bottom plan view

Fig. 5, Front view Fig. 6, Left side view

74. The BMA CT comprises the following design for an array microphone assembly:

-25-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 26 of 31 PageID #: 2319

Front, top, left perspective view of BMA CT, Rear, bottom, left perspective view of BMA
BMA CT, Quick-Start Guide (Rev. 2.4, Mar. CT, BMA CT, Quick-Start Guide (Rev. 2.4,
2019) at 1 (Exhibit C). Mar. 2019) at 14 (Exhibit C).

Top plan view of BMA CT, BMA CT, Datasheet Bottom, rear, left perspective view of BMA
(Rev. 2.0, 2019) at 1 (Exhibit D). CT, BMA CT, Quick-Start Guide (Rev. 2.4,
Mar. 2019) at 11 (Exhibit C).

-26-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 27 of 31 PageID #: 2320

Bottom view of BMA CT, BMA CT, Quick- Left side view of BMA CT, BMA CT,
Start Guide (Rev. 2.4, Mar. 2019) at 14 (Exhibit Quick-Start Guide (Rev. 2.4, Mar. 2019) at
C). 14 (Exhibit C).

75. In the eye of the ordinary observer familiar with the relevant prior art, giving such

attention as a purchaser of the BMA CT would usually give, the claimed design of the ’723

Patent and the design of ClearOne’s BMA CT product are substantially the same, such that the

ordinary observer would be deceived into believing that the design of BMA CT product is the

design claimed in the ’723 Patent.

76. ClearOne, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271, has directly infringed the ’723 Patent

by making, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing BMA CT product in the United States.

77. Upon information and belief, ClearOne has distributed and continually distributes

the BMA CT product through established distribution channels throughout the United States,

including, but not limited to ClearOne’s own sales network.

78. ClearOne’s acts with respect to the BMA CT product have been without license

or authority from Shure with respect to the ’723 Patent.

79. ClearOne, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 289, has directly infringed and continues to

infringe the ’723 Patent by applying the patented design of the ’723 Patent, or a colorable

imitation thereof, to an article of manufacture, including BMA CT product, for the purpose of

sale and/or by selling, offering, or exposing for sale an article of manufacture, including the

BMA CT product, to which the patented design of the ’723 Patent or a colorable imitation

thereof has been applied.

-27-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 28 of 31 PageID #: 2321

80. By reason of the ongoing and continuous infringement by ClearOne of the ’723

Patent, Shure is entitled to the entry of a permanent injunction, enjoining ClearOne from further

infringement of Shure’s design patent rights, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283.

81. Shure has suffered, and is continuing to suffer, damages as a result of ClearOne’s

infringement of the ’723 Patent, and Shure is entitled to compensation and other monetary relief

to the fullest extent allowed by law, including attorneys’ fees, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 284 and

285.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Shure respectfully requests the following relief:

(a) A judgement against ClearOne as to infringement of claims 17-20 and 23-27 of

the ’493 Patent;

(b) A judgement against ClearOne as to the infringement of the claimed design of the

’723 Patent;

(c) Preliminary and permanent injunctions under 35 U.S.C. § 283, enjoining

ClearOne and its officers, directors, agents, servants, affiliates, employees, subsidiaries, parents,

licensees, assigns, and customers, and all others acting in concert or participation with them,

from further acts of infringing, inducing infringement, and/or contributing to the infringement of

the ’493 Patent and from further acts of infringing the ’723 Patent;

(d) A judgment against ClearOne for money damages sustained as a result of

ClearOne’s infringement of the ’493 Patent in an amount to be determined at trial as provided

under 35 U.S.C. § 284, including enhanced damages due to, for example, ClearOne’s willful

infringement of the ’493 Patent;

-28-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 29 of 31 PageID #: 2322

(e) A judgement against ClearOne for ClearOne’s total profits of any article of

manufacture to which the claimed design of the ’723 Patent has been applied as a result of

ClearOne’s infringement of the ’723 Patent in an amount to be determined at trial as provided

under 35 U.S.C § 289 and for money damages sustained as a result of ClearOne’s infringement

of the ’723 Patent in an amount to be determined at trial as provided under 35 U.S.C. § 284,

whichever is greater;

(f) An accounting for infringing sales not presented at trial and an award by the Court

of additional damages for any such infringing sales;

(g) An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on the damages caused by

ClearOne’s infringing activities and other conduct complained of herein;

(h) A finding that this case is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. § 285;

(i) An award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in connection with this

action;

(j) A judgment against ClearOne for money damages sustained as a result of

ClearOne’s violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B), in an amount to be determined at trial;

(k) Preliminary and permanent injunctions enjoining ClearOne and its officers,

directors, agents, servants, affiliates, employees, subsidiaries, parents, licensees, assigns, and

customers, and all others acting in concert or participation with them, from further acts in

violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B);

(l) A judgment against ClearOne for money damages, pursuant to 6 Del. C. §§ 2532,

2533, sustained as a result of ClearOne’s violation of the Delaware Deceptive Trade Practices

Act, 6 Del. C. § 2532, in an amount to be determined at trial;

-29-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 30 of 31 PageID #: 2323

(m) Preliminary and permanent injunctions, pursuant to 6 Del. C. § 2533, enjoining

ClearOne and its officers, directors, agents, servants, affiliates, employees, subsidiaries, parents,

licensees, assigns, and customers, and all others acting in concert or participation with them,

from further acts in violation of 6 Del. C. § 2532;

(n) An award of attorneys’ fees, costs, and enhanced damages under 6 Del. C.

§ 2533(b), (c) based on ClearOne’s violation of 6 Del. C. § 2532;

(o) A judgment against ClearOne for money damages sustained as a result of

ClearOne’s violation of the common law tort of interference with business relations, in an

amount to be determined at trial;

(p) Preliminary and permanent injunctions enjoining ClearOne and its officers,

directors, agents, servants, affiliates, employees, subsidiaries, parents, licensees, assigns, and

customers, and all others acting in concert or participation with them, from further acts in

violation the common law tort of interference with business relations;

(q) A judgment against ClearOne for money damages sustained as a result of

ClearOne’s unfair competition under Delaware common law, in an amount to be determined at

trial;

(r) Preliminary and permanent injunctions enjoining ClearOne and its officers,

directors, agents, servants, affiliates, employees, subsidiaries, parents, licensees, assigns, and

customers, and all others acting in concert or participation with them, from further unfair

competition under Delaware common law;

-30-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64 Filed 11/19/19 Page 31 of 31 PageID #: 2324

(s) Any and all other relief as the Court finds just and proper.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Shure hereby respectfully requests a trial by jury on all issues so triable in accordance

with Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Dated: November 19, 2019


McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP

OF COUNSEL: /s/ Michael P. Kelly


Michael P. Kelly (#2295)
Gerald F. Ivey Brian R. Lemon (#4730)
Mareesa A. Frederick Alexandra M. Joyce (#6423)
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 405 N. King St., 8th Floor
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP Wilmington, DE 19801
901 New York Avenue, N.W. (302) 984-6300
Washington, D.C. 20001-4413 mkelly@mccarter.com
(202) 408-4000 blemon@mccarter.com
ajoyce@mccarter.com
Elliot C. Cook
Alexander M. Boyer
Joseph M. Schaffner Counsel for Plaintiffs
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
Two Freedom Square
11955 Freedom Drive
Reston, VA 20190-5675
(571) 203-2700

-31-
ME1 32007356v.1
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 1 of 79 PageID #: 2325

EXHIBIT A
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 2 of 79 PageID #: 2326
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 3 of 79 PageID #: 2327
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 4 of 79 PageID #: 2328
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 5 of 79 PageID #: 2329
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 6 of 79 PageID #: 2330
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 7 of 79 PageID #: 2331
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 8 of 79 PageID #: 2332
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 9 of 79 PageID #: 2333
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 10 of 79 PageID #: 2334
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 11 of 79 PageID #: 2335
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 12 of 79 PageID #: 2336
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 13 of 79 PageID #: 2337
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 14 of 79 PageID #: 2338
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 15 of 79 PageID #: 2339
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 16 of 79 PageID #: 2340
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 17 of 79 PageID #: 2341
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 18 of 79 PageID #: 2342
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 19 of 79 PageID #: 2343
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 20 of 79 PageID #: 2344
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 21 of 79 PageID #: 2345
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 22 of 79 PageID #: 2346
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 23 of 79 PageID #: 2347
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 24 of 79 PageID #: 2348
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 25 of 79 PageID #: 2349

EXHIBIT B
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 26 of 79 PageID #: 2350

 

Shure Debuts CONTACT


RELATIONS
PUBLIC

Shure Incorporated

Micro ex® Advance™ Attn: Allison Dolegowski

Telephone: (312) 736 6000

Ceiling and Table publicrelations@shure.com

Array Microphones EMAIL SIGNUP

Sign up to receive periodic


February 9, 2016

updates on new products,

events, seminars and the

latest Shure news. Click

here to subscribe

NILES, Ill., Feb. 9, 2016—Today, at Integrated Systems

Europe (ISE) 2016, Shure Incorporated unveiled Microflex®

Advance™, a portfolio of premium networked ceiling and

table array microphones, audio interfaces, and control

software for enhanced A/V conferencing that integrate

seamlessly to a premium meeting space aesthetic. Shure

Microflex Advance offers elegant, versatile, and scalable

solutions for A/V conferencing spaces that require pristine

speech intelligibility.

With the ability to flush-mount the Microflex Advance

Ceiling Array alongside standard ceiling tiles, and the

innovative new-to-the-world “toroid” polar pattern in the

Microflex Advance Table Array, Microflex Advance

microphones offer a dynamic package of technologies to

ensure a best-in-class audio experience. Microflex Advance

also presents an enhanced evolution of the Company’s


Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 27 of 79 PageID #: 2351
industry-leading IntelliMix® Digital Signal Processing

Suite, including Steerable Coverage™ technology, enabling


 
incredibly accurate control of audio capture in any location

of a meeting space. Lastly, Microflex Advance Array

Microphones use the Dante™ Audio Networking protocol,

with all control, audio, and power signals carried through a

single standard Ethernet cable connection.

“Microflex Advance is unique because it combines the deep

roots of expertise Shure has demonstrated in both the

acoustic and digital signal processing domains,” said Rob

Klegon, Associate Manager, Global Product Management at

Shure. “However, in building this system we knew we had

to go beyond pure technical innovation to meet the needs

of today’s corporate environments. As a result, each

feature of Microflex Advance is engineered to provide best-

in-class performance, from the acoustics and digital signal

processing, to the usability and aesthetic design.”

The Microflex Advance Ceiling Array is a premium

networked array microphone that captures best-in-class

audio from above the meeting space with Shure

proprietary Steerable Coverage technology, enabling up to

eight lobes that are configurable in three dimensions.

Designed for A/V conferencing environments—from

boardrooms to huddle rooms and multi-purpose spaces—


Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 28 of 79 PageID #: 2352
the Microflex Advance Ceiling Array microphone can be

flush-mounted in any standard ceiling tile grid. In addition,


 
the Ceiling Array can also be installed below the ceiling

with standard VESA-D and wire hanging mounts.

The Microflex Advance Table Array captures high-quality

audio and provides flexibility in varying A/V conferencing

environments. Within the onboard IntelliMix DSP Suite, the

Company’s proprietary Steerable Coverage technology

deploys up to four discrete audio channels around a table

and uses an innovative new “toroid” ring-shaped pattern to

reject unwanted artifacts from overhead such as HVAC or

projector fans. Programmable capacitive-touch mute

switches ensure simple user operation with the ability to

customize LED color and shape to indicate microphone

status.

Offering easy and efficient analog to digital/digital to

analog conversion, the four Shure Audio Network

Interfaces provide seamless audio routing in and out of the

Dante networked audio domain. Available in standard XLR

(mic/line) and block (mic/line) connector versions that

include LED and Mute switch pins for logic-enabled analog

microphones. All Audio Network Interfaces include a single

Ethernet port for easy Dante Audio routing and a browser-

based software for control of connectivity and monitoring.


Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 29 of 79 PageID #: 2353

All Microflex Advance hardware offerings feature built-in


 
control software, providing an intuitive interface to

simplify the process of adjusting microphone attributes—

such as configuration of presets, templates, and polar

patterns. Microflex Advance products also integrate easily

with third party controllers such as Crestron and AMX.

The entire Microflex Advance portfolio will be available

later this year. For more information, go to www.shure.com

or visit the Shure stand (#3-C90) at ISE 2016.

SIGN UP F OR OUR NEWSLET TER


ABOUT US

PERFORMANCE & PRODUCTION

CONFERENCING & MEETINGS

HEADPHONES & EARPHONES

SUPPORT

© 2009-2019 Shure Incorporated. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy


Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 30 of 79 PageID #: 2354

 
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 31 of 79 PageID #: 2355

EXHIBIT C
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 32 of 7

BMA CT
Beamforming Mic Array - Ceiling-Tile

Quick-Start Guide
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 33 of 7
Table of Contents
IMPORTANT SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS.......................................... 1
THE BMA CT................................................................................... 2
QUICK-START OVERVIEW............................................................. 3
CONNECTING THE ARRAYS......................................................... 4
I/O Connections............................................................................... 4
P-Link Connections........................................................................... 6
UPDATING ARRAY FIRMWARE..................................................... 8
TESTING THE ARRAYS.................................................................. 8
Volume & Mute................................................................................. 8
Microphone Array LED Indicators.................................................... 8
Microphone Array Orientation.......................................................... 9
MOUNTING THE ARRAYS............................................................ 10
Plenum Shield with Seismic Cables.................................................. 10
Plenum Shield Installation.............................................................. 11
Seismic Cables................................................................................ 12
COMPLIANCE............................................................................... 13
Part Numbers................................................................................. 13
Supported CONVERGE Pro 2....................................................... 13
ISOMETRIC DIAGRAMS.............................................................. 14
SUPPORTED CONVERGE PRO 2................................................ 15
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 FiledQUICK-START GUIDE
11/19/19 Page 34 of 7
IMPORTANT SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS
1. Read these instructions.
2. Keep these instructions.
3. Heed all warnings.
4. Follow all instructions.
5. Do not use this apparatus near water.
6. Clean only with dry cloth.
7. Do not block any ventilation openings. Install in accordance with the
manufacturer’s instructions.
8. Do not install near any heat sources such as radiators, heat registers,
stoves, or other apparatus (including amplifiers) that produce heat.
9. Do not defeat the safety purpose of the polarized or grounding-type
plug. A polarized plug has two blades with one wider than the other. A
grounding type plug has two blades and a third grounding prong. The
wide blade or the third prong are provided for your safety. If the provided
plug does not fit into your outlet, consult an electrician for replacement of
the obsolete outlet.
10. Protect the PoE injector’s power cord from being walked on or pinched
particularly at plugs, convenience receptacles, and the point where they
exit from the apparatus.
11. Only use attachments/accessories specified by the manufacturer.
12. Unplug the array during lightning storms or when unused
for long periods of time.
13. Refer all servicing to qualified service
personnel. Servicing is required when the
apparatus has been damaged in any way, such as power-
supply cord or plug is damaged, liquid has been spilled or
objects have fallen into the apparatus, the apparatus has been exposed to
rain or moisture, does not operate normally, or has been dropped.

1
BMA CT
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 35 of 7
THE BMA CT
The BMA CT is a 2nd-generation Beamforming Microphone Array
solution for ceiling-tile installations, featuring 24 microphones, and
beamforming and adaptive-steering technology (think of it as smart
beam selection) designed specifically for the CONVERGE® Pro 2 (CP2)
products: 128, 128D, 128T, 128TD, 128V, 128VD, 128VT, 128VTD, 120,
, 48T, 48VT, 48VTD, and 48V. The arrays connect with the CONVERGE
Pro 2 through a Peripheral Link (P-Link) port with either Regular (200 ft.)
or Long Distance (650 ft.) P-Link cables. Three arrays are supported per
CP2 via either regular or long-distance P-Link, and up to 6 arrays can be
daisy-chained in one regular P-Link chain with a stack of two CP2 mixers.
Power to the arrays is supplied through a Power-Over-Ethernet (PoE)
or P-Link connection from CP2. The array comes in both a 24-inch and
600mm size. There is also an adapter that converts the 600mm version
to 625mm.
IMPORTANT: The BMA CT arrays can only be used with CP2
systems. It is not compatible with CONVERGE Pro or first-
generation Beamforming Mic Array systems.
The latest version of the CP2 firmware and software can be found on the
ClearOne website at:
http://www.clearone.com/resource-product-line?pid=1029
The latest version of the BMA CT firmware and Installation Guide can be
found on the ClearOne website at:
http://www.clearone.com/resource-product-line?pid=1030

2
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 FiledQUICK-START GUIDE
11/19/19 Page 36 of 7
QUICK-START OVERVIEW
Installing and using the BMA CT arrays in your CP2 site is subject to the
following parameters:
1. The arrays can only be used with CP2 systems.
2. You must have a 128, 128D, 128T, 128TD, 128V, 128VD, 128VT,
128VTD, 120, 48T, 48VT, 48VTD, and/or 48V. mixer in the site. The
arrays will not work with standalone 012, 128SR, or 128SRD units.
3. Connect up to 3 arrays (current) per CP2 unit, and up to 6 arrays
per Regular P-Link chain with 2 CP2 unit stack. More CP2 units may
be added to increase the number of arrays per site.

Quick-Start Procedures
These steps must be done in the following order to use the BMA CT in
your CONVERGE Pro 2 site:
1. Update the CONVERGE Pro 2 firmware to the latest version using
CONVERGE Pro 2 CONSOLE software.
2. Connect the array to the updated CONVERGE Pro 2 via the P-Link
bus.
3. Update the array firmware using CONVERGE Pro 2 CONSOLE.
(The array firmware can not be upgraded without an updated
CONVERGE Pro 2.)
4. Test the array.
5. Mount the array.

3
BMA CT
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 37 of 7
CONNECTING THE ARRAYS
Connect the BMA CT units to the CP2 unit via P-Link connections using
CAT6-24AWG solid conductor RJ45 cables.

I/O Connections
PoE P-Link P-Link
Speakers out In In Out

Power-source
selection switch
The arrays must be powered by an external PoE source that supports
Mode B type power delivery. (A PoE Network Switch generally will not
work for this.) A PoE injector can either be connected to P-Link PoE port
on the rack-mounted CP2 unit, or it can be connected directly to the ar-
ray’s PoE In port.
When driving 2x10W speakers, each array requires its own PoE injector.
When the PoE injector is connected to the CP2 unit’s P-Link PoE port, the
CP2 unit’s P-Link Out port will provide both power and data communica-
tions to the array. If the PoE injector is connected directly to the array PoE
In port, a second cable must be connected from the CP2 unit’s P-Link
Out port to the array P-Link In port. (Note that the CP2 unit itself does not
provide PoE power without an external PoE injector.)

4
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 FiledQUICK-START GUIDE
11/19/19 Page 38 of 7
ClearOne PoE power supply part number 910-3200-202 is recom-
mended, and will power up to three P-Link devices. Some third-party PoE
injectors will work, but not all. Mode B PoE injectors that meet the PoE
IEEE 802.3at specification should power three devices.
See also this app note:
http://www.clearone.com/sites/default/files/PoE_and_CP2_P-link_Periph-
eral_Products.pdf
The power-source-selection switch should be set towards PoE if the array
is powered by PoE, or set towards P-Link if powered by P-Link.
Speaker Usage
When driving 2x10W speakers, each array requires its own PoE injector.
Set the “Power Select” switch to “PoE In” when the speaker outputs will
be used.

5
BMA CT
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 39 of 7
P-Link Connections

PoE

PoE
CONVERGE Pro 2 P-Link
(Power, Audio, Control)
2 x 10W
speakers

P-Link

PoE
Connecting 3 BMA CT units to one CP2 Unit.

P-Link cables can vary in length up to 200 ft


2 x 10W
BMA CT requires its own PoE (IEEE 802.3at-compliant) speakers
if speakers are driven
P-Link
PoE

2 x 10W
speakers

6
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 FiledQUICK-START GUIDE
11/19/19 Page 40 of 7

PoE

CONVERGE Pro 2 P-Link


(Power, Audio, Control)

Up to 200 ft.

Connecting 3 BMA CT units and 3 P-Link P-Link


compatible devices to one CP2 unit. Up to 200 ft.

P-Link
Up to 200 ft.

P-Link
Up to 200 ft.

PoE

P-Link
Up to 200 ft.

7
BMA CT
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 41 of 7
UPDATING ARRAY FIRMWARE
1. Connect the P-Link cable between the CP2 units and the arrays.
2. Connect the CP2 units with CONVERGE Pro 2 CONSOLE.
3. Open the Firmware Loader screen.
4. Browse for the BMA_CT_vx.x.x.x.mdo file.
5. Download the array firmware.
6. The array(s) will default and reboot after the download of firmware.
7. Units are fully upgraded. (All array units connected via the P-Link on
the site are simultaneously updated.)

TESTING THE ARRAYS


The array must be added to the site using the CONVERGE Pro 2
CONSOLE software. This software also provides the capability of
configuring the beams (enable/disable) and other characteristics
available in Configuration mode. Refer to the online help available with
the CONVERGE Pro 2 CONSOLE software.
Volume & Mute
These controls are available through the controller configured for your
CONVERGE Pro 2 site.
Microphone Array LED Indicators
The illuminated LED indicators on the face of the array change color
when the microphone array is active/muted. You can choose colors to
indicate either state, or even set the indicators to remain off by using
CONVERGE Pro 2 CONSOLE to change Unit Properties for the array.
8
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 FiledQUICK-START GUIDE
11/19/19 Page 42 of 7
Microphone Array Orientation
The LED indicators should be oriented in the room according to the
beam selection needs for optimal coverage. The diagrams below show
the orientation of the LED indicators toward the head of the conference
table with the resulting room coverage and beam mapping shown below.
Please be certain to remove the orientation label from the perforated
room panel before use.

9
BMA CT
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 43 of 7
MOUNTING THE ARRAYS
Plenum Shield with Seismic Cables
If installing both the plenum shield and seismic cables, four slots of
approximately 1” length should be cut diagonally in the plenum shielding
to match the points of seismic cable attachment. Otherwise, skip this step
and go to page 11 for installation of plenum shield only or page 12 for
isntallation of seismic cables only.

10
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 FiledQUICK-START GUIDE
11/19/19 Page 44 of 7
Plenum Shield Installation
Remove the liner from adhesive in four places on underside of shielding,
and thread cables through cut slots before attaching to ceiling.

11
BMA CT
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 45 of 7
Seismic Cables Installation
The array can be ceiling-mounted in a suspended ceiling, held in place
by the standard T-BAR grid, with additional 1/8” safety (seismic) cables
(not included). Four attachment points are recommended for stability. If
installing with the plenum shield, feed cables thru slots cut in earlier step
(see Pg 10).
Detailed instructions are included in the BMA CT Installation Guide
available on the ClearOne website:
http://www.clearone.com/resource-product-line?pid=1030

12
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 FiledQUICK-START GUIDE
11/19/19 Page 46 of 7
COMPLIANCE
Details on compliance can be found on the ClearOne website under
“Resource Library”.

Part Numbers
Item Part No.

White BMA CT 24” 910-3200-205


White BMA CT 600mm 910-3200-205-I
PoE Power Supply Kit 910-3200-202
50 Ft RJ45 CAT6 Cable 910-3200-204-50
100 Ft RJ45 CAT6 Cable 910-3200-204-100
150 Ft RJ45 CAT6 Cable 910-3200-204-150
200 Ft RJ45 CAT6 Cable 910-3200-204-200

13
BMA CT
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 47 of 7
ISOMETRIC DIAGRAMS
side views

back view

14
43-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 FiledQUICK-START
Supported CONVERGE Pro 2
GUIDE
11/19/19 Page 48 of 7
Item Part No.

CONVERGE Pro 2 128 910-3200-001


CONVERGE Pro 2 128D 910-3200-001-D
CONVERGE Pro 2 128T 910-3200-002

CONVERGE Pro 2 128TD 910-3200-002-D


CONVERGE Pro 2 128V 910-3200-003
CONVERGE Pro 2 128VD 910-3200-003-D
CONVERGE Pro 2 128VT 910-3200-009
CONVERGE Pro 2 128VTD 910-3200-009-D
CONVERGE Pro 2 48T 910-3200-005
CONVERGE Pro 2 48V 910-3200-006
CONVERGE Pro 2 48VT 910-3200-008
CONVERGE Pro 2 48VTD 910-3200-008-D
CONVERGE Pro 2 120 910-3200-004

CLEARONE LOCATIONS
Headquarters: US & Canada Sales
Tel: 801.975.7200 Tel: 801.975.7200
5225 Wiley Post Way
Toll Free: 800.945.7730 e-mail: sales@clearone.com
Suite 500
Fax: 801.303.5711
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
TechSupport
Tel: 801.975.7200 International
Tel: 801.974.3760
Sales: 800.707.6994 Tel: +1.801.975.7200
e-mail: tech.support@clearone.
e-mail: global@clearone.com com

© 2019 ClearOne, Inc. All rights reserved.


15
Information in this document is subject to change without notice. QSG-0074-001 Rev 2.4 Mar 2019
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 49 of 79 PageID #: 2373

EXHIBIT D
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 50 of 79 PageID #: 2374
Beamforming Microphone Array | BMA CT

The BMA CT is a patented ceiling tile


beamforming mic array that blends in
perfectly with today’s drop ceilings.

Built in acoustic echo cancellation, noise


cancellation, and beam selection eliminate
the need for per-beam processing in a DSP
mixer — requiring fewer DSP mixer resources.

Built in 2x10 Watt into 8-ohm power amplifier


conveniently drives loudspeakers.

APPLICATIONS
Convenient Ceiling-Tile Flexible, Scalable, and Cost-Effective
Form Factor ++ Built-in processing eliminates the need for per-beam Boardrooms
processing in a DSP mixer — ­ requiring fewer DSP mixer
++ Drops easily into standard ceiling-tile grid
systems resources

++ Integrated features significantly reduce ++ Daisy-chain ceiling tiles via P-Link for larger conference
system design complexity set-ups —
­ for simpler wiring and longer distances
Conference Rooms
compared to networked “home run” connections
++ Simple installation
++ Daisy-chain P-Link devices such as the DIALOG® 20
++ Consumes less rack space Wireless Mic System

++ Lower cost ++ Long distance P-Link mode allows 650 ft (200 m) Large Lecture Halls
between tiles for a total cable reach of 1950 ft (600 m)
++ Three sizes available to fit US and
international ceiling-grid tile sizes ++ Single cable for power, audio, and control
++ Zero consumption of DSP mixer analog inputs
Training Centers

Advanced Audio Processing Configuration & Management


++ Most advanced Acoustic Echo Cancellation Courtrooms
++ Pro CONSOLE® software
++ Noise Cancellation
++ Auto-discovery of devices
++ Adaptive steering (think of it as smart switching)
++ System monitoring and troubleshooting
— no need to adjust individual beams
Telemedicine Facilities
++ Advanced gating with adaptive ambient for
seamless combining of multiple BMA CT units

++ Replaces 9 to 12 traditional microphones


Houses of Worship
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 51 of 79 PageID #: 2375
Beamforming Microphone Array | BMA CT

Connections Orientation
BMA CT I/O CONNECTIONS Orient leds towards either end of the table

Connection Diagrams

P-Link carries up to 16x16 audio channels


Operating Modes

Standard Mode

2 2 1
1 3
6 4 5
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 52 of 79 PageID #: 2376
Beamforming Microphone Array | BMA CT

Diagrams

Side views

back view
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 53 of 79 PageID #: 2377
Beamforming Microphone Array | BMA CT

PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS

24 microphones P-Link Peripheral Bus Dimension & Weight (WxHxD)


Uses P-Llink channels and C-Link channels based on P-Link In & Out: Proprietary Network 24” BMA CT:
configuration 23.72 x 23.72 x 2.13” (602.5 x 602.5 x 54.1mm)
Ports Type: RJ-45 600 mm BMA CT:
Number of Beams: Two patterns, either 5 or 6 beams 23.33 x 23.33 x 2.13” (592.5 x 592.5 x 54.1 mm)
Cable: RJ45 Cat5e, Cat6, Expandable
Polar Pattern: Custom Unit Weight: 7.7lbs (3.5kg)
Distance: Up to 650 ft.
Frequency Response: 150Hz – 16kHz, +/- 3dB Shipping Weight: 11.5lbs (5.2kg)
Daisy-Chain:
Dynamic Range: 150Hz – 16kHz, > 70dB Up to 3 Array units and additional P-Link compatible Part Numbers
devices with each supported CONVERGE Pro 2 unit 910-3200-205: 24” White BMA CT
Amplifier Output in the same chain
Type: 5.08mm Black Header, Male, Phoenix type Up to 6 Array units in the same chain with 2 910-3200-205-I: 600 mm White BMA CT
Euroblock supported CONVERGE Pro 2 units connected
through C-Link
Audio: 2 Channels Supported CONVERGE Pro 2
Long Distance P-Link:
Output Power: 2x10W Max, 8Ω load* Increases P-Link distance from 200 ft. to 650 ft.; Part Number Product
(200M) max cable distance between any two units;
910-3200-001 CONVERGE Pro 2 128
Frequency Response: 20Hz – 22kHz @ +10dBu, +/- Cat6, 550 MHz, 23 AWG, solid conductor cable;
0.5dB Do not use Copper Clad Aluminum (CCA) cable 910-3200-001-D CONVERGE Pro 2 128D

910-3200-002 CONVERGE Pro 2 128T


THD + Noise: 20Hz – 22kHz @ +10dBu, 1W, < 0.2% Power Selection Switch
Type: Slide Switch 910-3200-002-D CONVERGE Pro 2 128TD
Dynamic Range: 20Hz – 22kHz @ +20dB, > 102dB, Slide toward P-Link to power device by P-Link
910-3200-003 CONVERGE Pro 2 128V
with 20kHz digital low pass filter Slide toward PoE to power device by PoE Injector or
Dante PoE 910-3200-003-D CONVERGE Pro 2 128VD
Crosstalk: Channel to Channel, stimulus at +20dBu to
910-3200-005 CONVERGE Pro 2 48T
receptor 10W output 8Ω load, 20Hz – 22kHz, < 60dB Configuration & Administration Software
CONVERGE CONSOLE Software
® ®
910-3200-006 CONVERGE Pro 2 48V
LED 910-3200-008 CONVERGE Pro 2 48VT
4 LED indicators on one end of unit: Mounting
Mute/Un-mute configuration with 8 color options, Ceiling mount (24" or 600mm drop-ceiling grid) 910-3200-008-D CONVERGE Pro 2 48VTD
two blink patterns and warning indications
910-3200-004 CONVERGE Pro 2 120
Power & Thermal
Configuration Power Type: PoE
Beam enable/disable
Port Type: RJ-45 Accessories
Acoustic Echo Cancellation (AEC) on/off
Power Source: PoE Injector or equivalent Part Number Product
Noise Cancellation (NC) on/off PoE Power supply kit for
910-3200-202
PoE: BMA CT and BMA CTD
Filters: IEEE 802.3at compliant devices providing 56V and
910-3200-204-50 50 ft RJ45 CAT6 Cable
All Pass 640 mA (36 W).
Low Pass P-Link In - Mode B 910-3200-204-100 100 ft RJ45 CAT6 Cable
High Pass PoE In - Mode A and Mode B
910-3200-204-150 150 ft RJ45 CAT6 Cable
Notch
PEQ *BMA CT requires its own PoE (IEEE 802.3 at 910-3200-204-200 200 ft RJ45 CAT6 Cable
compliant) if 2x10W speakers are driven
Automatic Level Control (ALC) on/off Brackets to convert 600 to
910-3200-205-01
Power Consumption: 625 mm
Gain adjust 100-240VAC, 50/60Hz
9.1 Watt Typical without speaker amp
Mute on/off 38W at max power 1kHz (2 x 10W)

Auto gate/Manual gate Thermal: 130 BTU/Hr at max power

Operating Temperature:
14° F/-10° C to 104° F/40° C ambient temperature

Sales and Inquiries


Headquarters US & Canada International Sales TechSupport

5225 Wiley Post Way Tel: 801.975.7200 Tel: +1.801.975.7200 Tel: 801.975.7200 Tel: 801.974.3760
Suite 500 Toll Free: 800.945.7730 global@clearone.com sales@clearone.com tech.support@clearone.com
Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Fax: 801.303.5711

Other product names may be registered trademarks of their respective owners who do not necessarily endorse ClearOne or ClearOne’s
products. All rights reserved. Information in this document subject to change without notice. DST-0144-001 rev2.0 © 2019 ClearOne.
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 54 of 79 PageID #: 2378

EXHIBIT E
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 55 of 79 PageID #: 2379
BMA CT

HOST A MEETING (HTTPS://WWW.COLLABORATESPACE.NET/#/HOSTMEETING)

JOIN A MEETING (HTTPS://WWW.COLLABORATESPACE.NET/#/MEETING)

LOGIN (/USER/LOGIN?CURRENT=NODE/3541)

(/)

BMA CT
The BMA CT is a patented ceiling tile beamforming mic array that blends in perfectly with today's
drop ceilings.
 

Product Overview Specifications

Patented Ceiling Tile Beamforming Mic Array with a Superior


Architecture for Reduced Complexity and Cost
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 56 of 79 PageID #: 2380
24 microphones
1 Channel In (Uses P-Link channels or C-Link channels for speakers, no input channels in CP2)
Number of Beams: Two patterns, either 5 or 6 beams
Polar Pattern: Custom
Frequency Response: 150Hz – 16kHz, +/- 3dB
Dynamic Range: 150Hz – 16kHz, > 70dB

Amplifier Output
Type: 5.08mm Black Header, Male, Phoenix type Euroblock
Audio: 2 Channels
Frequency Response: 20Hz – 22kHz @ +10dBu, +/- 0.5dB
THD + Noise: 20Hz – 22kHz @ +10dBu, 1W, < 0.2%
Dynamic Range: 20Hz – 22kHz @ +20dB, > 102dB, with 20kHz digital low pass filter
Crosstalk: Channel to Channel, stimulus at +20dBu to receptor 10W output 8Ω load, 20Hz –
22kHz, < 60dB

LED
4 LED indicators on one end of unit:
- Mute/Un-mute configuration with 8 color options, two blink patterns and warning indications

Configuration
Beam enable/disable
Acoustic Echo Cancellation (AEC) on/off
Noise Cancellation (NC) on/off
Filters:
- All Pass
- Low Pass
- High Pass
- Notch
- PEQ
Automatic Level Control (ALC) on/off
Gain adjust
Mute on/off
Auto gate/Manual gate

P-Link Peripheral Bus


Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 57 of 79 PageID #: 2381
P-Link In & Out: Proprietary Network
Ports Type: RJ-45
Cable: RJ45 Cat5e, Cat6, Expandable
Distance: Up to 650 ft.
Daisy-Chain:
- Up to 3 Array units and additional P-Link compatible devices with each supported CONVERGE
Pro 2 unit in the same chain
- Up to 6 Array units in the same chain with 2 supported CONVERGE Pro 2 units connected
through C-Link
Long-Distance P-Link:
- Increases P-Link distance from 200 ft. to 650 ft.; (200M) max cable distance between any two
units; Cat6, 550 MHz, 23 AWG, solid conductor cable; Do not use Copper Clad Aluminum (CCA)
cable

Power Selection Switch


Type: Slide Switch
- Slide toward P-Link to power device by P-Link
- Slide toward PoE to power device by PoE Injector

Configuration & Administration Software


Pro CONSOLE® Software

Power & Thermal


Power Type: PoE
Port Type: RJ-45
Power Source: PoE Injector or equivalent
PoE:
- IEEE802.3at compliant devices providing 56V and 640 mA (36 W)
- P-Link In - Mode B
- PoE In - Mode A and Mode B
*Each BMA CT requires its own 802.3at compliant power injector if loudspeakers are being
used.
Power Consumption:
100-240VAC, 50/60Hz 9.1 Watt Typical without speaker amp 38W at max power 1kHz (2 x 10W)
Thermal: 130 BTU/Hr at max power
Operating Temperature: 14° F/-10° C to 104° F/40° C ambient temperature
p g p
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB p
Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 58 of 79 PageID #: 2382

Dimension & Weight (WxHxD)


24” BMA CT: 23.72 x 23.72 x 2.13” (602.5 x 602.5 x 54.1mm)
600 mm BMA CT: 23.33 x 23.33 x 2.13” (592.5 x 592.5 x 54.1 mm)
Unit Weight: 7.7lbs (3.5kg)
Shipping Weight: 11.5lbs (5.2kg)

Part Numbers
910-3200-205: 24” White BMA CT
910-3200-205-I: 600 mm White BMA CT

Supported CONVERGE® Pro 2


910-3200-001 CONVERGE Pro 2 128
910-3200-001-D CONVERGE Pro 2 128D
910-3200-002 CONVERGE Pro 2 128T
910-3200-002-D CONVERGE Pro 2 128TD
910-3200-003 CONVERGE Pro 2 128V
910-3200-003-D CONVERGE Pro 2 128VD
910-3200-009 CONVERGE Pro 2 128VT
910-3200-009 CONVERGE Pro 2 128VTD
910-3200-005 CONVERGE Pro 2 48T
910-3200-006 CONVERGE Pro 2 48V
910-3200-008 CONVERGE Pro 2 48VT
910-3200-008-D CONVERGE Pro 2 48VTD
910-3200-004 CONVERGE Pro 2 120

Accessories
910-3200-202 PoE Power supply kit for BMA CT and BMA CTD
910-3200-205-01 Brackets to convert 600 to 625 mm
910-3200-205-CB BMA CT Conduit Box
910-3200-204-50 50 ft RJ45 CAT6 Cable
910-3200-204-100 100 ft RJ45 CAT6 Cable

910-3200-204-150 150 ft RJ45 CAT6 Cable


910-3200-204-200 200 ft RJ45 CAT6 Cable
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 59 of 79 PageID #: 2383

Resource Library
Ready for a deeper dive?

CLICK HERE (http://www.clearone.com/resource-product-line?pid=1030)

Related Products

O T H E R P R O D U C T S T H A T M A Y I N T E R E S T Y O U

(http://www.clearone.com/sites/default/files/BFM2%20DST.pdf)

(http://www.clearone.com/converge- (http://www.clearone
pro-2-48vt-0) pro-2-48
BEAMFORMING
MICROPHONE ARRAY 2 CONVERGE PRO 2 48VT CONVERGE P

(HTTP://WWW.CLEARONE.C (HTTP://WWW.CLEARONE.C (HTTP://WWW


PRO-2-48VT-0) PRO-2-4
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 60 of 79 PageID #: 2384

SEE DETAILS SEE DETAILS SEE DET

(http://www.clearone.com/sites/default/fil (http://www.clearone.com/converge- (http://www.clearone


pro-2-48vt-0) pro-2-48

Subscribe to our Blog

Enter Email SUBSCRIBE

Edgewater Corporate Park South Tower

5225 Wiley Post Way, Suite 500

Salt Lake City, UT 84116

Phone: 1-801-975-7200

All rights reserved © ClearOne Inc. 2019

Privacy Policy (/privacy-policy)


Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 61 of 79 PageID #: 2385

EXHIBIT F
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 62 of 79 PageID #: 2386
BMA CT

HOST A MEETING (HTTPS://WWW.COLLABORATESPACE.NET/#/HOSTMEETING)

JOIN A MEETING (HTTPS://WWW.COLLABORATESPACE.NET/#/MEETING)

LOGIN (/USER/LOGIN?CURRENT=NODE/3541)

(/)

BMA CT
The BMA CT is a patented ceiling tile beamforming mic array that blends in perfectly with today's
drop ceilings.
 

Product Overview Specifications

Patented Ceiling Tile Beamforming Mic Array with a Superior


Architecture for Reduced Complexity and Cost

Key Highlights
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 63 of 79 PageID #: 2387
> Built in acoustic echo cancellation, > Built in 2x10 Watt into 8-ohm power
noise cancellation, and beam amplifier conveniently drives
selection eliminate the need for per- loudspeakers.
beam processing in a DSP mixer -
requiring fewer DSP mixer resources.

> Integrated features can significantly > Daisy chain ceiling tiles via P-Link for
reduce system design complexity, larger conference setups – for
simplify installation, streamline simpler wiring and longer distances
configuration and programming, compared to networked “home run”
consume less rack space, and lower connections.
cost.

> Adaptive steering (think of it as smart > Use P-Link to daisy chain additional
switching) - no need to adjust peripherals such as wireless mics,
individual beams - for impeccable USB Expanders, and GPIO
room coverage. Expanders.

> ClearOne’s BMA technologies are > Ceiling tiles and peripherals can be
protected by at least a dozen patents P-Linked with zero consumption of
and pending patent applications. analog I/O and signal processing in
the DSP mixer leaving those
resources available for other needs.

> Supports three different ceiling grid > Each ceiling tile microphone array
types: 24-inch for US, 600 mm, and supports long distance P-Link mode
625 mm for international. with 650 feet (200 meters) between

tiles, for a total cable reach of 1950


feet (600 meters).

Applications

Audio Conferencing
Video Conferencing
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 64 of 79 PageID #: 2388

Environments

Boardrooms
Conference rooms
Training centers
Lecture halls
Courtrooms
Telemedicine facilities

Resource Library
Ready for a deeper dive?

CLICK HERE (http://www.clearone.com/resource-product-line?pid=1030)

Related Products

O T H E R P R O D U C T S T H A T M A Y I N T E R E S T Y O U

(http://www.clearone.com/sites/default/files/BFM2%20DST.pdf)

(http://www.clearone.com/converge- (http://www.clearone
pro-2-48vt-0) pro-2-48
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 65 of 79 PageID #: 2389

BEAMFORMING CONVERGE PRO 2 48VT CONVERGE P


MICROPHONE ARRAY 2 (HTTP://WWW.CLEARONE.C (HTTP://WWW
(HTTP://WWW.CLEARONE.C PRO-2-48VT-0) PRO-2-4

SEE DETAILS SEE DETAILS SEE DET

(http://www.clearone.com/sites/default/fil (http://www.clearone.com/converge- (http://www.clearone


pro-2-48vt-0) pro-2-48

Subscribe to our Blog

Enter Email SUBSCRIBE

Edgewater Corporate Park South Tower

5225 Wiley Post Way, Suite 500

Salt Lake City, UT 84116

Phone: 1-801-975-7200

All rights reserved © ClearOne Inc. 2019

Privacy Policy (/privacy-policy)


Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 66 of 79 PageID #: 2390

EXHIBIT G
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 67 of 79 PageID #: 2391
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 68 of 79 PageID #: 2392
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 69 of 79 PageID #: 2393
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 70 of 79 PageID #: 2394
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 71 of 79 PageID #: 2395
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 72 of 79 PageID #: 2396
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 73 of 79 PageID #: 2397
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 74 of 79 PageID #: 2398
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 75 of 79 PageID #: 2399
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 76 of 79 PageID #: 2400
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 77 of 79 PageID #: 2401
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 78 of 79 PageID #: 2402
Case 1:19-cv-01343-RGA-CJB Document 64-1 Filed 11/19/19 Page 79 of 79 PageID #: 2403

Оценить