Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
As indicated by De Guzman (2018), agriculture is dying, this is the current event that is
happening in our country as the agricultural land is being cultivated or developed as industrial
areas, malls or subdivisions. The agricultural land today is now becoming commercial land as the
time pass by. Our number of farmers are suddenly degrading as their children shift careers and not
continuing their work, this just shows that the agricultural industry here in our country does not
improved since ages. The agricultural school who should produce people to help in agricultural
industry are producing office-oriented workers instead. We say that our country is an agricultural
country but the events that are happening are building up a serious question, “Are we still an
agricultural country?” As we can see students from other countries came here to the Philippines to
study agriculture and technology that we use in the said field but what happened? Their agricultural
Rice tarrification will produce greater revenue as there will be a higher tariff or tax
collection from the increased imports in the country. The said tariff will be allocated as a budget
for the agriculture sector and as a result, the agrarian region will be more competitive in
contributing for the growth of the country’s economy (Ibon Media, 2019). In addition to this,
Cantos, Go, Montesa and Sta. Anna III (2019), also stated that the rice tarrification law will give
a total fund of 10 billion pesos as a subsidy for technical assistance, seeds, credit and
mechanization for the farmers, making it possible to produce more final goods. Such improvement
and modernization brought by the funding on the agriculture sector will secure a safety net for the
total output of gross domestic product which contributes to the development of the Philippine’s
economy.
In summary, rice tariffication law is needed because the agriculture sector of the
Philippines is slowly degrading as lands that were once rice fields are being developed and made
for infrastructures. Such modern developments caused for a decrease rice farms and so,
importation is necessary in order to supply the country’s needs. Moreover, rice tarrification law
will paved way for the development of the country’s economy. The said law will give way for the
funding for farmers which will result in higher final goods being produced and a substantial growth
of the economy.
As mentioned by Cantos, Go, Montesa and Sta. Anna III (2019), in their news article
entitled “Understanding Rice Tarrification”, retail price of rice has not declined as compared to
farm gate prices which had a significant drop in price. This only proves that even though
Philippines is set to have 2.4 million metric tons of imported rice for the 2019, prices still varies
from different sectors. This is contrary to the belief of tarrification advocates, they mentioned that
increase rice importation will help in aiding the continuous growth of inflation in the Philippines.
A minimal change in the price selling of rice will not solve the surging inflation of the country.
There is no guarantee that lifting the qualitative restriction on rice importation will make all prices
go down. As long as there is market influence by large-scale or seller segment, prices will still
vary even if there will be a steady supply of rice thus, it only contributes to inflation.
Rice tarrification does not support the needs of the Filipino farmers as this law is giving
the other countries an unlimited volume of rice to deliver here in our country. As this law is still
present, the volume of the inflow of the imported cheaper rice will increase as the price of the local
rice will decrease this will lead to a billion number of decrease as in both volume, production and
price of local rice product (Cororaton, Tiongco, & Yu, 2019) . In addition, Mogato (2019), cited
that as rice imports will continue because of the unlimited quota, there will be more stock of rice
as it will be combined with the local rice that are not being dispose. It just shows that it is too much
for food security as the imported and local rice will be stock in a storage. There will be only an
In conclusion, price drop of rice in the market is not ensured by the lifting of qualitative
restrictions of rice importation. Thus, it will not help in the rising inflation in the country, but
instead it will only contribute in the growing expenses of the people. Furthermore, increased
number of imported rice will only result in the decreased production and price of local rice. Also,
greater rice imports would only yield to overabundance of rice supply which is excessive for food
security.
References:
Cororaton, C., Yu, K. and Tiongco, M. (2019). Potential Effects of RA 11203 (Philippine Rice
https://www.bworldonline.com/potential-effects-of-ra-11203-philippine-rice-tariffication/
https://www.philstar.com/opinion/2018/06/18/1825542/agriculture-dying-philippines
Go, L., Cantos, J., Montesa, A. and Sta. Ana III, F. (2019). Understanding rice tariffication |
IBON Foundation. (2019). Further imperiling Philippine rice. [online] Available at:
Mogato, A. (2019). Butterfly effect: How rice tariffication bill affects everyone. [online] Rappler.
beyond-
industry?fbclid=IwAR3aNuikiwWzY4O14CnMKIY4LQzDWFHucoGE92z30YL9QvP7