Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Scope of Work 1
1.3 Approach 2
2. Project Proposal 3
2.1 Overview 3
2.2 Open Channel Intake and Discharge 3
2.3 Intake Pump Station 5
2.4 Desalination Plant 5
2.5 Supply, Intake and Discharge Pipelines 6
3. Noise Sources 9
3.1 Construction 9
3.2 Operational 9
3.3 Road Traffic 10
4. Noise Criteria 11
4.1 Construction Noise 11
4.2 Operational Noise 12
4.3 Rail and Road Traffic Noise 14
9. Conclusions 49
10. Limitations 50
References 51
Table Index
Table 1 Assigned noise levels 12
Table 2 Adjustment for intrusive or dominant noise
characteristics 13
Table 3 Outdoor noise criteria, dB(A) 14
Table 4 Sound level meter and environmental noise logger
details 17
Table 5 Meteorological data for Jacup AWS 18
Table 6 Attended noise monitoring results, dB(A) 19
Table 7 Noise logging results, dB(A) 20
Table 8 Summary of attended and unattended noise
monitoring, dB(A) 24
Table 9 Receptor locations 25
Table 10 Predicted plant activity noise levels, dB(A) 27
Table 11 Typical vibration levels for construction equipment 29
Table 12 Meteorological conditions for noise modelling 31
Table 13 Inventory of operational noise sources 32
Table 14 Estimated sound power levels, dB(A) 35
Table 15 Estimated internal sound pressure levels, dB(A) 37
Table 16 Transmission loss of building materials, dB 38
Table 17 Normal operations predicted night time LA 10 noise
levels, dB(A) 38
Table 18 Non routine operations predicted night time LA 10
noise levels, dB(A) 40
61/26005/11/105911 Southdown Magnetite Project - Cape Riche Seawater Desalination Plant iii
Noise and Vibration Assessment
Figure Index
Figure 1 Indicative site layout 4
Figure 2 Desalination plant process flow diagram 8
Figure 3 Cape Riche campsite monitoring location 16
Figure 4 Campsite location looking towards the intake pump
station location 16
Figure 5 Moir residence monitoring location 16
Figure 6 Moir residence monitoring location looking towards
the intake pump station location 16
Figure 7 Lock residence monitoring location 17
Figure 8 Lock residence monitoring location looking towards
the desalination plant location 17
Figure 9 Turner residence monitoring location 17
Figure 10 Turner residence monitoring location looking
towards the desalination plant location 17
Figure 11 Isometric view – Desalination plant 37
Figure 12 Predicted night time LA 10 noise levels under neutral
meteorological conditions 41
Figure 13 Predicted night time LA 10 noise levels under worst
case meteorological conditions – Winds blowing
towards Cape Riche campsite 42
Figure 14 Predicted night time LA 10 noise levels under worst
case meteorological conditions – Winds blowing
towards Moir residence 43
Figure 15 Predicted night time LA 10 noise levels under worst
case meteorological conditions – Winds blowing
towards Lock residence 44
Figure 16 Predicted night time LA 10 noise levels under worst
case meteorological conditions – Winds blowing
towards Turner residence 45
Appendices
A Noise Logging Results
B Layout Drawings
C Glossary of Noise Terminology
D Noise Charts
CadnaA Computer Aided Noise Abatement software used for calculating predicted noise
emissions.
CEO Chief Executive Officer
GL gigalitre
ha hectare, 10,000 m2
IF influencing factor
ML megalitre
RO reverse osmosis
UF ultra filtration
Grange Resources Limited (Grange), as part of the Southdown Magnetite Project, propose to develop
the Cape Riche Seawater Desalination Plant consisting of an intake pump station, reverse osmosis (RO)
desalination facility and adjoining pipelines between the Plant and the Southdown mine. The Plant is
designed to provide up to 12 gigalitres per annum (GL/a) of treated water for use at the Southdown mine.
GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) was commissioned by Grange to assess the potential noise and vibration impacts
for the construction and operation of the Plant.
Noise Sources
Construction activities expected to be undertaken at the sites include site clearance earthworks,
concreting, welding, cutting, grinding and mechanical lifting including cranes, trucks and mobile
platforms. The majority of activities will occur on-site between 08:00 and 17:00 Monday to Saturday.
Major operational noise sources present during the operation of the Plant include:
Conclusion
Assessment of the Cape Riche Seawater Desalination Plant indicates:
Construction activities associated with the intake pump station may be audible at Moir residence and
the Cape Riche campsite and as such should only be undertaken during week days or Saturdays
between 07:00 and 19:00;
Predicted noise levels generated by the Plant during normal operations under neutral and worst case
meteorological conditions are well below the night time assigned LA 10 noise level of 35 dB(A) at Cape
Riche campsite and Moir, Lock and Turner residences; and
Predicted noise levels generated by the Plant during non routine operations under neutral and worst
case meteorological conditions are below the night time assigned LA 10 noise level of 35 dB(A) at the
four assessed sensitive receptors.
Based on the information provided and assessment of predicted noise levels, it is expected that the Plant
can meet relevant noise goals and no further mitigation measures are recommended for operation of the
Plant.
This report provides a noise assessment for the Cape Riche Seawater Desalination Plant and should be
read based on the limitations presented in Section 10.
61/26005/11/105911 Southdown Magnetite Project - Cape Riche Seawater Desalination Plant vii
Noise and Vibration Assessment
1. Introduction
Grange Resources Limited (Grange) intend to develop a seawater desalination plant to supply up to 12
gigalitres per annum (GL/a) of water to the Southdown mine, as part of the Southdown Magnetite
Project. The Cape Riche Seawater Desalination Plant comprises an intake pump station, reverse
osmosis (RO) desalination facility and intake and discharge pipelines extending from the outfall site at
Cheyne Bay Inlet to the Plant and from the Plant to the Southdown mine site.
1.1 Background
The Cape Riche Seawater Desalination Plant was proposed by Grange to supplement in-situ water
supplies at the Southdown mine for the purpose of transporting ore to processing and port facilities in
Albany via the planned slurry pipeline. The Plant is proposed to be constructed on freehold land 4.5 km
east of Cape Riche, which is currently used for livestock and cropping agriculture.
The desalination facility will be supplied by an intake pump station located adjacent to the coast at Cape
Riche. The intake pump station is planned to be submerged underground to insulate against noise and
visual impacts, however, will still require a transformer and electrical building with appropriate access
roads. The desalination plant will take water from the open channel intake located near Cheyne Inlet
Beach and will discharge water from the Southern Ocean Brine Discharge, located on the southern side
of Cape Riche.
The Southdown Magnetite Project involves the construction and operation of an open pit magnetite mine
located approximately 90 km east north east of Albany, near Wellstead.
The design of the Cape Riche Seawater Desalination Plant is provided in the Southdown Magnetite and
Kemaman Pellet Plant Project Pre Feasibility Study (PFS) (Grange Resources/Sojitz 2010). This design
has been used as a basis for this assessment. The sections below provide a summary of the information
provided in the PFS.
2.1 Overview
The desalinated water supply system will consist of a seawater RO desalination plant at Cape Riche with
pumped transfer of desalinated water to the mine site. The desalinated water will be used primarily as
process water at the mine site, with a small portion further treated at the mine site to provide potable
water.
The Plant has a design capacity of approximately 35 million litres per day (ML/d), based on the
production of 12 GL/a. Figure 1 provides an indicative site layout. The key components of the Plant are:
1. Open Channel Intake and Discharge: The desalination plant will take water from the open channel
intake located near Cheyne Inlet Beach and will discharge water from the Southern Ocean Brine
Discharge, located on the southern side of Cape Riche.
2. Intake Pump Station: In order to transport the saline water to the desalination plant site pumps will
operate at the coast.
3. Desalination Plant: The treatment of saline water will involve large scale RO to produce a treated
water supply and brine discharge.
4. Supply, Intake and Discharge Pipelines: Three major pipelines will be required for the desalination
plant, including supply, intake and discharge lines.
Figure 2 provides a schematic of the desalination plant system.
GN
(
!
OW
GNOWANGERUP
(
!
JERRAMUNGUP
TAMBELLUP
EL
(
!
)
SA
(
!
m
(
!
(
!
L
ND
5k
ro ad
EN
AL
2.
CRANBROO K
p p te
W
RD
x
BREMER BAY
(a ells
(
!
O
O WE LLSTEAD (
!
D
W
RD
(
!
MO UNT BARKER
(
!
DE NMARK
ALBANY
Southern
LITTLE GROVE
(
!
(
!
(
!
Ocean
Y
HW
T
24.5km DN600 Underground Pipeline
AS
CO
Treated Water Transfer
H
UT
SO
Approved
6,175,000
6,175,000
Pit Boundary
SH
EA
R
CA
ER
NB: Actual road does not folllow
PE
METTLER LAKE
RD
NATURE Road Reserve as marked.
R ICH
RESERVE Pipeline to follow actual road
ER
disturbance corridor.
Public
D
Camp Grounds
RD
TL ER
MET
K
PA R CHEYNE ISLAND
IO NA L 4.5km DN630 Underground Pipeline
N AT NATURE RESERVE
S E LL Seawater Concentrate Disposal
HA S
NB: Pipeline is generally
located within cleared PROPOSED
farm land. Indicative
CONSERVATION
PARK Pump Station
Lease Boundary
R14942
6,168,000
6,168,000
4.5km DN800 PE Pipe
VENNS RD
D
Cape Riche
LR
Desalination Plant
I
BA S
BASIL ROAD
RD
NATURE N OR
RESERVE TU R
o
0 0.75 1.5 2.25 3 Seawater Supply Pipeline Desalination Plant Pit Boundary Southdown Environment Revision 0
Kilometres Treated Water Transfer Pump Station Cadastral Boundary Cape Riche Date 02 MAY 2011
G:\61\26005\GIS\Maps\MXD\612600502_G001_Fig1a_R ev0.mxd 239 Adelaide Terrace Perth WA 6004 Australia T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555 E permail@ghd.com.au W www.ghd.com.au
© 2011. While GHD has taken care to ensure the accuracy of this product, GHD, Harley Global, Landgate, DEC and Grange Resources make no representations or warranties about its accuracy, completeness or suitability for any particular purpose.
GHD, Harley Global, Landgate, DEC and Grange Resources cannot accept liability of any kind (whether in contract, tort or otherwise) for any expenses, losses, damages and/or costs (including indirect or consequential damage) which are or may be incurred as a result of the product being inaccurate, incomplete or unsuitable in any way and for any reason.
Data source: Landgate: Cadastre, Reserve or National Park - 20101018, Road Names - 20110411; Grange Resources: Mosaic - 200901, Pit Boundary - 20100812; Harley Global: Seawater Pipeline, Desalination Plant, Pump Station, Outfall Pipeline, Treated Water Transfer - 20110502. Created by: tgoad
2.3 Intake Pump Station
The seawater intake pump station site occupies an area of approximately 0.25 hectares (ha). Seawater
from the intake structure flows by gravity through the intake conduit to a below ground (- 6 m AHD)
seawater screening and pumping station. This assessment has assumed two vertical shaft centrifugal
intake pumps extracting flows from the stilling well.
The intake pump station includes two travelling band screens upstream of the seawater pumps to reduce
entrained marine biota into the system and to mitigate the risk of pump fouling. There are two screens in
a duty/standby arrangement. The screens consist of fine mesh with 3 mm openings. Solid wastes will be
placed in bins for periodic removal.
Ultra filtration (UF) pre treatment plant to remove suspended solids from the seawater; and
RO desalination plant to remove salt from the seawater.
3.1 Construction
Noise and vibration generated as a result of construction activities are outlined below. Construction
works are due to commence as soon as all relevant approvals and permits are obtained and is expected
to occur over an 18 month period.
Construction activities expected to be undertaken include civil excavation and earthworks, building
construction, equipment fabrication and installation, waste removal and materials transfer. Construction
activities will occur between 08:00 to 17:00 Monday to Saturday. Work at other times would only occur if
required for special tasks or to recover lost time due to project delays. Where possible, activities that
could result in elevated noise levels will be scheduled during day time work hours.
An assessment of construction noise and vibration has been made in Section 6.
3.2 Operational
Noise sources resulting from operation of the Cape Riche Seawater Desalination Plant are outlined
below. Major operational noise sources present during operation include:
Seawater intake pump station:
– Seawater intake pumps; and
– Travelling band screen drives.
Desalination plant – UF pre treatment:
– UF feed pumps;
– Backwash screw compressors; and
– Backwash rotary air blowers.
Desalination plant - RO membranes (six trains):
– RO feed booster pumps;
– RO high pressure feed pumps;
– Energy recovery devices (ERD);
– ERD feed booster pumps;
– RO flushing pumps;
– RO clean in place (CIP) pumps; and
– Permeate (desalinated water) pumps.
Wastewater sludge collection and dewatering:
– Thickener feed pumps;
– Thickener drives;
– Dewatering feed pumps;
– Decanted centrifuge (sludge dewatering);
– Screw conveyors; and
Environmental noise in WA is managed through the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997
(the Regulations). The Regulations specify maximum allowable external noise levels at noise sensitive,
commercial and industrial premises. The Regulations also state requirements for construction sites.
The construction work must be carried out in accordance with control of environmental noise
practices set out in Section 6 of AS 2436-2010;
The equipment used for construction must be the quietest reasonably available;
The contractor must advise all nearby sensitive receptors likely to receive noise levels which fail to
comply with the assigned levels under Regulation 8 (Table 1) of the work to be done at least 24
hours before it commences;
The contractor must show that it was reasonably necessary for the work to be done out of hours; and
The contractor must submit to the DEC CEO a noise management plan at least seven days prior to
the commencement of work and the plan must be approved by the CEO. The plan must include
details of:
– Reasons for the construction work needing to be completed out of hours;
– Details of activities which are likely to result in noise emissions that lead to exceedance of
assigned levels;
– Predictions of the noise emissions on the site;
– Details of measures used to control noise (including vibration) emissions;
– Procedures to be adopted for monitoring noise (including vibration) emissions; and
– Complaint response procedures to be adopted.
IF = influencing factor
1
Located within 15m of a building directly associated with a noise sensitive use.
2
Located further than 15 m from a building directly associated with a noise sensitive use
+5 dB +5 dB +5 dB
Assigned noise levels (Table 1) have been set differently for noise sensitive, commercial and industrial
and utility premises. For noise sensitive premises an influencing factor (IF) is incorporated into the
assigned noise levels. IF depends on land use zonings within circles of 100 m and 450 m radius from the
noise receiver, including:
Proportion of industrial land use zonings;
Proportion of commercial zonings; and
Presence of major or secondary roads.
For this assessment it has been assumed that IF will be zero for all noise sensitive premises surrounding
the Plant, as they are more than 450 m from any industrial or commercial premises or major road.
For noise sensitive residences, the time of day also affects the assigned levels. The Regulations define
three types of assigned noise level:
LA 10 assigned noise level which is not to be exceeded for more than 10% of the time;
LA 1 assigned noise level which is not to be exceeded for more than 1% of the time; and
LA Max assigned noise level means a noise level which is not to be exceeded at any time.
The LA 10 noise limit is the most significant for this assessment as this is representative of continuous
noise emissions from the Plant.
3
Adjustment applies where noise emission is not music
4
Adjustments are cumulative to a maximum of 15 dB
Retrospectively to noise from existing railways or major roads in the vicinity of an existing noise
sensitive land use; and
To proposals involving an increase in traffic along an existing railway or major road in the absence of
a major redevelopment.
Table 3 outlines outdoor noise criteria applying to proposals for new noise-sensitive developments or
new major roads and railways assessed under the SPP 5.4.
Figure 5 Moir residence monitoring location Figure 6 Moir residence monitoring location
looking towards the intake pump
station location
At each noise monitoring location, an environmental noise logger was deployed for two weeks and was
set to continuously record LA 1, LA 10, LA 90 and LA Eq noise levels at 15 minute intervals. The noise logger
was calibrated before and after measurement. Table 4 provides details of the noise logger used.
5
Note that calibration was undertaken in the field prior to any measurements taken on the instrument. Equipment calibration is also
undertaken in the laboratory prior to sending equipment out for hire.
The LA 90 and LA Eq day, evening and night levels for each monitoring location is shown in Table 7. Table 7
also provides the rating background level (RBL) for each sensitive receptor. The RBL is defined as:
The overall single figure background level representing each assessment period (day/evening/night) over
the whole monitoring period. It is defined as the median value of:
– All the day assessment background levels over the monitoring period for the day (07:00 to
19:00);
– All the evening assessment background levels over the monitoring period for the evening (19:00
to 22:00); or
– All the night assessment background levels over the monitoring period for the night (22:00 to
07:00).
The wind speed for Jacup AWS (as shown in Appendix A) exceeds 5 m/s on a regular basis and
occasionally exceeds 10 m/s. Recognised noise monitoring procedures exclude high (>5 m/s) wind
speeds in calculation of LA 90 and LA Eq values. As 33 of the 42 day, evening and night periods have
recorded wind speeds >5 m/s, calculation of LA 90 and LA Eq values was undertaken excluding wind
speeds greater than 7 m/s which provided calculated values for all but nine day, evening or night periods.
As wind speed at Jacup AWS is measured at a height of 10 m, 7 m/s at the Jacup AWS is roughly
equivalent to 5 m/s at the height of the noise logger microphone (1.5 m).
Noise descriptor LA 90 LA Eq LA 90 LA Eq LA 90 LA Eq
9 February 2011 43 47 44 47 43 47
10 February 2011 44 47 46 48 47 49
11 February 2011 - - - - - -
12 February 2011 - - 53 54 53 55
13 February 2011 52 53 - - 53 55
14 February 2011 51 53 48 51 48 50
15 February 2011 44 48 45 47 46 49
16 February 2011 - - - - - -
17 February 2011 50 52 51 53 50 52
18 February 2011 47 49 48 51 44 47
19 February 2011 41 45 45 47 50 52
20 February 2011 50 51 - - 53 55
21 February 2011 52 54 53 55 54 56
22 February 2011 52 55 53 55 52 54
RBL 50 51 48 51 50 52
Noise descriptor LA 90 LA Eq LA 90 LA Eq LA 90 LA Eq
Moir residence
9 February 2011 28 34 26 33 26 31
10 February 2011 32 41 34 37 35 42
11 February 2011 - - - - - -
12 February 2011 - - 43 48 43 46
13 February 2011 41 46 - - 43 46
14 February 2011 40 43 36 39 37 41
15 February 2011 30 38 30 34 34 38
16 February 2011 - - - - - -
17 February 2011 40 43 41 43 39 47
18 February 2011 37 42 37 40 31 38
19 February 2011 31 40 # # # #
20 February 2011 # # # # # #
21 February 2011 # # # # # #
22 February 2011 # # # # # #
RBL 35 42 36 39 36 42
Noise descriptor LA 90 LA Eq LA 90 LA Eq LA 90 LA Eq
Lock residence
9 February 2011 32 48 30 39 28 35
10 February 2011 40 51 40 48 39 44
11 February 2011 - - - - - -
12 February 2011 - - 48 55 44 51
13 February 2011 38 50 - - 44 51
14 February 2011 44 50 34 40 28 36
15 February 2011 32 45 29 36 30 38
16 February 2011 - - - - - -
17 February 2011 44 50 41 48 36 43
18 February 2011 38 46 40 46 28 38
19 February 2011 38 49 43 48 43 49
20 February 2011 46 53 - - 43 49
21 February 2011 51 57 44 49 41 48
22 February 2011 48 54 45 51 # #
RBL 40 50 41 48 39 44
Noise descriptor LA 90 LA Eq LA 90 LA Eq LA 90 LA Eq
Turner residence
9 February 2011 31 40 31 34 29 33
10 February 2011 33 42 32 38 33 39
11 February 2011 - - - - - -
12 February 2011 - - 44 54 50 59
13 February 2011 47 55 - - 48 56
14 February 2011 43 53 37 46 37 45
15 February 2011 32 41 29 36 33 43
16 February 2011 - - - - - -
17 February 2011 39 48 41 50 35 44
18 February 2011 39 48 44 50 30 34
19 February 2011 35 42 34 39 38 46
20 February 2011 39 47 - - 48 55
21 February 2011 49 58 50 57 48 55
22 February 2011 49 57 49 56 41 46
RBL 39 48 39 48 38 46
- No data available for the time period (wind speed >5 m/s for the entire period).
Table 8 provides a summary of attended and unattended noise monitoring results at each sensitive
receptor. The reported value from attended monitoring is the noise level measured and the reported
value from unattended monitoring is the RBL noise level calculated from the two weeks of noise logging.
Noise descriptor LA 90 LA Eq LA 90 LA Eq LA 90 LA Eq
Attended 49 52 - - - -
Unattended 50 51 48 51 50 52
Moir residence
Attended 42 45 - - - -
Unattended 35 42 36 39 36 42
Lock residence
Attended 41 46 - - - -
Unattended 40 50 41 48 39 44
Turner residence
Attended 41 47 - - - -
Unattended 39 48 39 48 38 46
Received noise produced by anticipated activities, during the construction of the Plant are shown in
Table 10 for a variety of distances, with no noise barriers or acoustic shielding in place and with each
plant item operating at full power. The sound pressure levels shown are maximum levels produced when
machinery is operated under full load.
Other construction noise sources such as a concrete batching plant are expected to have similar sound
power levels to the noise sources shown in Table 10. The magnitude of off-site noise impact associated
with construction will be dependent upon a number of factors:
The intensity and location of construction activities;
The type of equipment used;
Existing local noise sources;
Intervening terrain; and
The prevailing weather conditions.
Construction machinery will move about the Plant site area, altering the directivity of the noise source
with respect to individual receptors. During any given period the machinery items to be used in the Plant
area will operate at maximum sound power levels for only brief stages. At other times the machinery may
produce lower sound levels while carrying out activities not requiring full power. It is unlikely that all
construction equipment would be operating at their maximum sound power levels at any one time.
Finally, certain types of construction machinery will be present in the Plant area for only brief periods
during construction.
Backhoe 104 62 48 42 39 36 26 22
Bulldozer 108 66 52 46 43 40 30 26
Compactor 113 71 57 51 48 45 35 31
Excavator 107 65 51 45 42 39 29 25
Grader 110 68 54 48 45 42 32 28
Scraper 116 74 60 54 51 48 38 34
Welder 105 63 49 43 40 37 27 23
The closest sensitive receptors to any potential noise source during construction of the intake pump
station is the Moir Homestead and Cape Riche campsite, approximately 560 m and 1,110 m,
respectively, from the intake pump station. From Table 10, noise levels exceeding the day time LA 10
Backhoe 1.0
Bulldozer 2.5-4.0
Construction activity may result in varying degrees of ground vibration depending on the equipment used
and methods employed. Operation of construction equipment causes ground vibration which spread
through the ground and diminish in strength with distance. Buildings founded on the soil in the vicinity of
the construction site respond to these vibrations with varying results, ranging from no perceptible effects
at the lowest levels, low rumbling and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels and slight building
damage at the highest levels.
From Table 11, equipment proposed for site preparation and construction of the Plant will generate low
levels of vibration which are unlikely to result in any vibration risks to structures. The lower limit for
vibrations resulting in building damage of 5 mm/s is normally not exceeded by general construction
activities at distances greater than 20 m from the nearest sensitive receptor.
Given the distances involved between site works and the nearest receptors, vibrations affecting human
comfort and building integrity are not expected to be an issue.
The objective of operational noise modelling is to determine the requirements enabling the Cape Riche
Seawater Desalination Plant to achieve compliance with the night time LA 10 assigned level of 35 dB(A) at
the nearest sensitive receptors under neutral and adverse weather conditions. Note that these are the
most stringent criterion applicable to noise emissions from the Plant.
Noise modelling was undertaken using Computer Aided Noise Abatement (CadnaA) to predict the effects
of industrial noise generated by the Plant.
CadnaA considers local topography, weather conditions, reflection, ground absorption, relevant building
structures, site sources and the location of the receptor areas to predicted received noise levels. The
method specified in ISO 9613-2 consists specifically of octave-band algorithms (with nominal mid band
frequencies from 31.5 Hz to 8 kHz) for calculating the attenuation of sound. The algorithms used in this
model account for the following physical features:
Geometrical divergence;
Atmospheric absorption;
Ground effect;
Reflection from surfaces; and
Screening by obstacles.
In assessing meteorological conditions, the CONCAWE method has been applied instead of ISO 9613-2
weather correction. Modelling results are based on available information provided and should only be
used as a guide for comparative purposes.
A default ground absorption of 0.5 as specified in ISO 9613 was used in the modelling. In GHD’s
experience, this has generally been found to be appropriate for surrounding areas which are
predominantly cleared grassland and forested areas.
Temperature 20 C 20 C 20 C
As sensitive receptors are located in several directions from the intake pump station and desalination
plant, assessment under worst case wind direction for each receptor has been undertaken.
Estimated sound power levels used in the model are presented in Table 14. Sound power levels were
determined from one of the following:
CadnaA sound power level calculation protocols;
Sound power levels provided by design team;
GHD’s internal database of sound power levels; or
Engineering Noise Control (Bies and Hansen 2003).
For the purposes of noise modelling, all sources are assumed to be operating continuously.
1 Seawater intake pump 520 @1,480 2 online, Top mounted vertical Seawater intake pump station Outdoor
rpm 1 standby shaft centrifugal
2 Travelling band screen 2.5 kW 2 online Travelling band Seawater intake pump station Outdoor
drive screens (3 mm)
5 Backwash air 14 kW 2 online Screw compressor Compressor and blower room Indoor
compressor (located in UF and RO building)
6 Backwash air blower 28 kW 2 online Rotary air blower Compressor and blower room Indoor
(located in UF and RO building)
7 UF feed pump 132 kW 6 online, Variable speed drive UF and RO building Indoor
1 standby
8 High pressure RO feed 710 kW 6 online, Variable speed drive UF and RO building Indoor
pump 1 standby
9 RO feed booster pump 75 kW 6 online, Variable speed drive UF and RO building Indoor
1 standby
11 ERD feed booster pump 75 kW 6 online, Variable speed drive UF and RO building Indoor
1 standby
13 RO clean in place (CIP) 10 kW 6 online, Fixed speed drive UF and RO building Indoor
pump 1 standby
15 Permeate (desalinated 630 kW 2 online, Variable speed drive Process water pumping station Outdoor
water) pump 1 standby
17 Thickener feed pump 40 kW 2 online, Fixed speed drive Dewatering area Outdoor
1 standby
18 Supernatant return pump 75 kW 1 online, Fixed speed drive Dewatering area Outdoor
1 standby
21 Thickened sludge pump 10 kW 2 online, Fixed speed drive Dewatering building Indoor
1 standby
22 Centrifuge feed pump 1 kW 2 online, Fixed speed drive Dewatering building Indoor
1 standby
26 Diesel generator 1 MW 1 online Diesel genset West wall, RO and UF building Outdoor
(emergency power)
27 Heavy vehicles (delivery - 3 trucks Large articulated or Entrance gate, chemical storage Outdoor
and sludge removal) non articulated trucks and sludge removal areas
RO feed pump
2.0 40 54 66 75 80 87 85 81 73 90 93
710 kW
RO flushing pump
1.0 37 51 63 72 77 84 82 78 70 87 89
75 kW
Permeate pump
2.0 40 54 65 75 80 86 85 80 72 90 92
630 kW
Wastewater Treatment
Centrifuge drive
4.0 14 27 40 50 58 62 62 57 46 66 68
2.5 kW
Other Sources
Heavy vehicle
3.0 66 76 85 93 101 96 95 90 84 104 111
Diesel generator
2.0 54 70 82 89 94 96 95 92 85 101 105
UF and RO building
44 59 69 76 82 86 86 86 83 92
Sludge dewatering
26 39 50 60 66 72 70 66 57 75
building
Admin
Process water tank
Workshop
UF and RO building
Compressor and
blower room
Sludge dewatering
Steel cladding 3 8 15 17 22 27 32 38 45 26
Steel roofing 0 3 8 14 20 23 26 27 35 23
Moir residence 13 14 65
Lock residence 12 18 60
The night time LA 10 noise level contour plot under neutral meteorological conditions is shown in Figure
12. Figure 12 shows there are no exceedances of the night time assigned level of 35 dB(A) predicted at
any sensitive receptors and compliance with 65 dB(A) at the Plant boundary is demonstrated for neutral
meteorological conditions.
6
Worst case wind direction from closest noise source (from pump station or desalination plant).
As such, noise modelling has been completed for non routine operations consisting of heavy vehicle
movements and operation of the emergency diesel generator during night periods.
Predicted night time LA 10 noise levels generated by the Plant during non routine operations at noise
sensitive receptor locations for different meteorological conditions are summarised in Table 18.
Moir residence 23 28 65
Lock residence 18 25 60
Table 18 shows predicted night time LA 10 noise levels under non routine operation of the Plant which
comply with the assigned level of 35 dB(A) at all sensitive receptors under neutral and worst case
meteorological conditions.
7
Worst case wind direction from closest noise source (from pump station or desalination plant).
35 dB(A)
40 dB(A)
45 dB(A)
50 dB(A)
55 dB(A)
60 dB(A)
65 dB(A)
70 dB(A)
75 dB(A)
80 dB(A)
85 dB(A)
90 dB(A)
LEGEND
Noise sensitive receptor
Point noise source
SCALE
0 1000 2000
Metres (at A3)
COPYRIGHT
THIS DOCUMENT IS AND SHALL REMAIN
THE PROPERTYOF GHD PTY LTD
THIS DOCUMENT MAY ONLY BE USED
FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT
WAS COMMISSIONED
AND IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE TERMS OF
ENGAGEMENT FOR THE COMMISSION.
35 dB(A)
40 dB(A)
45 dB(A)
50 dB(A)
55 dB(A)
60 dB(A)
65 dB(A)
70 dB(A)
75 dB(A)
80 dB(A)
85 dB(A)
90 dB(A)
LEGEND
Noise sensitive receptor
Point noise source
SCALE
0 1000 2000
Metres (at A3)
COPYRIGHT
THIS DOCUMENT IS AND SHALL REMAIN
THE PROPERTYOF GHD PTY LTD
THIS DOCUMENT MAY ONLY BE USED
FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT
WAS COMMISSIONED
AND IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE TERMS OF
ENGAGEMENT FOR THE COMMISSION.
MAP PROJECTION: Universal Transverse Mercator SOUTHDOWN MAGNETITE PREDICTED NIGHT TIME NOISE LEVELS
HORIZONTAL DATUM: Geocentric Datum of Australia (GDA)
GRID: Map Grid of Australia 1994, Zone 50 PROJECT NORMAL OPERATIONS
CAPE RICHE SEAWATER
FIGURE 13
DATE FILE LOCATION
08.04.2011 G:/61/26005/11/CADNA/Desal
DESALINATION PLANT Noise contours: LA 10
Grid height: 1.5 m
REVISION DRAWING NO. Noise and Vibration Worst case meteorological conditions -
0 CAMPSITE_NORMAL OPS.srf
Assessment Winds blowing towards Cape Riche campsite
PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS
35 dB(A)
40 dB(A)
45 dB(A)
50 dB(A)
55 dB(A)
60 dB(A)
65 dB(A)
70 dB(A)
75 dB(A)
80 dB(A)
85 dB(A)
90 dB(A)
LEGEND
Noise sensitive receptor
Point noise source
SCALE
0 1000 2000
Metres (at A3)
COPYRIGHT
THIS DOCUMENT IS AND SHALL REMAIN
THE PROPERTYOF GHD PTY LTD
THIS DOCUMENT MAY ONLY BE USED
FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT
WAS COMMISSIONED
AND IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE TERMS OF
ENGAGEMENT FOR THE COMMISSION.
MAP PROJECTION: Universal Transverse Mercator SOUTHDOWN MAGNETITE PREDICTED NIGHT TIME NOISE LEVELS
HORIZONTAL DATUM: Geocentric Datum of Australia (GDA)
GRID: Map Grid of Australia 1994, Zone 50 PROJECT NORMAL OPERATIONS
CAPE RICHE SEAWATER
FIGURE 14
DATE FILE LOCATION
08.04.2011 G:/61/26005/11/CADNA/Desal
DESALINATION PLANT Noise contours: LA 10
Grid height: 1.5 m
REVISION DRAWING NO. Noise and Vibration Worst case meteorological conditions -
0 MOIR_NORMAL OPS.srf
Assessment Winds blowing towards Moir residence
PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS
35 dB(A)
40 dB(A)
45 dB(A)
50 dB(A)
55 dB(A)
60 dB(A)
65 dB(A)
70 dB(A)
75 dB(A)
80 dB(A)
85 dB(A)
90 dB(A)
LEGEND
Noise sensitive receptor
Point noise source
SCALE
0 1000 2000
Metres (at A3)
COPYRIGHT
THIS DOCUMENT IS AND SHALL REMAIN
THE PROPERTYOF GHD PTY LTD
THIS DOCUMENT MAY ONLY BE USED
FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT
WAS COMMISSIONED
AND IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE TERMS OF
ENGAGEMENT FOR THE COMMISSION.
MAP PROJECTION: Universal Transverse Mercator SOUTHDOWN MAGNETITE PREDICTED NIGHT TIME NOISE LEVELS
HORIZONTAL DATUM: Geocentric Datum of Australia (GDA)
GRID: Map Grid of Australia 1994, Zone 50 PROJECT NORMAL OPERATIONS
CAPE RICHE SEAWATER
FIGURE 15
DATE FILE LOCATION
08.04.2011 G:/61/26005/11/CADNA/Desal
DESALINATION PLANT Noise contours: LA 10
Grid height: 1.5 m
REVISION DRAWING NO. Noise and Vibration Worst case meteorological conditions -
0 LOCK_NORMAL OPS.srf
Assessment Winds blowing towards Lock residence
PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS
35 dB(A)
40 dB(A)
45 dB(A)
50 dB(A)
55 dB(A)
60 dB(A)
65 dB(A)
70 dB(A)
75 dB(A)
80 dB(A)
85 dB(A)
90 dB(A)
LEGEND
Noise sensitive receptor
Point noise source
SCALE
0 1000 2000
Metres (at A3)
COPYRIGHT
THIS DOCUMENT IS AND SHALL REMAIN
THE PROPERTYOF GHD PTY LTD
THIS DOCUMENT MAY ONLY BE USED
FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT
WAS COMMISSIONED
AND IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE TERMS OF
ENGAGEMENT FOR THE COMMISSION.
MAP PROJECTION: Universal Transverse Mercator SOUTHDOWN MAGNETITE PREDICTED NIGHT TIME NOISE LEVELS
HORIZONTAL DATUM: Geocentric Datum of Australia (GDA)
GRID: Map Grid of Australia 1994, Zone 50 PROJECT NORMAL OPERATIONS
CAPE RICHE SEAWATER
FIGURE 16
DATE FILE LOCATION
08.04.2011 G:/61/26005/11/CADNA/Desal
DESALINATION PLANT Noise contours: LA 10
Grid height: 1.5 m
REVISION DRAWING NO. Noise and Vibration Worst case meteorological conditions -
0 TURNER_NORMAL OPS.srf
Assessment Winds blowing towards Turner residence
7.4 Road Traffic Noise Assessment
Construction of the Cape Riche Seawater Desalination Plant is likely to increase traffic on these roads by
a very small amount, with up to ten truck movements per day expected and assuming the construction
work force is transported to the site by bus, 20 bus movements per day. There would also be other
contractor vehicle movements.
Operation of the Plant is likely to increase daily traffic only slightly with up to five trucks per day from the
inward movement of materials, such as water treatment chemicals and removal of wastes, such as
sludge. In addition to heavy vehicle traffic, up to 25 light vehicle movements are anticipated due to
commuting staff.
The increase in traffic due to construction and operation of the Plant is considered minimal and is not
expected to increase traffic noise significantly.
The assessment of predicted noise impacts from the Cape Riche Seawater Desalination Plant indicates
it is unlikely that assigned night time LA 10 noise levels will be exceeded at surrounding sensitive
receptors. This section outlines general mitigation measures which will be implemented during design,
construction and operation of the Plant.
Noise modelling has demonstrated that predicted noise levels generated by the Cape Riche Seawater
Desalination Plant during normal operations under neutral and worst case meteorological conditions are
below the night time assigned LA 10 noise level of 35 dB(A) at all sensitive receptors and the assigned
level of 65 dB(A) at the Plant boundary. Noise modelling has also demonstrated that predicted noise
levels during non routine operations (such as heavy vehicle deliveries during night periods) under neutral
and worst case meteorological conditions are below the night time assigned LA 10 noise level of 35 dB(A)
at all sensitive receptors.
Based on the information provided and model predicted noise levels, no additional mitigation measures
are recommended for operation of the Plant.
Noise impacts associated with construction of the intake pump station are likely to be audible and may
cause nuisance at Moir residence and to a lesser extent at the Cape Riche campsite. Inline with the
Regulations, activities that cause excessive noise will be limited to week days or Saturdays between
07:00 and 19:00. Noise impacts associated with construction of the desalination plant are unlikely to be
audible or to cause nuisance.
Assessment of vibration due to construction of the intake pump station or desalination plant concluded
that vibrations affecting human comfort or building integrity were not expected to be an issue.
The increase in traffic due to construction and operation of the Plant is small when compared against
current traffic volumes. Therefore the traffic generated due to operation of the Plant is not expected to
increase traffic noise significantly.
Therefore based on the information provided and assessment of results it is expected that the Plant can
meet relevant noise goals.
This Report for Southdown Magnetite Project – Cape Riche Seawater Desalination Plant – Noise and
Vibration Assessment (“Report”):
1. Has been prepared by GHD Pty Ltd (“GHD”) for Grange Resources (“Grange”) for the purposes of
approvals by State and Federal agencies;
2. May only be used and relied on by Grange and relevant State and Federal approvals authorities;
3. Must not be copied to, used by, or relied on by any person other than Grange or State and Federal
approvals authorities without the prior written consent of GHD; and
4. May only be used for the purpose of investigation and analysis to determine the noise and
vibration impacts from operation of the Southdown Magnetite Project – Cape Riche Seawater
Desalination Plant (and must not be used for any other purpose).
GHD and its servants, employees and officers otherwise expressly disclaim responsibility to any person
other than Grange arising from or in connection with this Report.
To the maximum extent permitted by law, all implied warranties and conditions in relation to the services
provided by GHD and the Report are excluded unless they are expressly stated to apply in this Report.
The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this Report were limited to those
specifically detailed in Section 1.2 of this Report. It is not the intention of the assessment to cover every
element of the acoustical environment, but rather to conduct the assessment with consideration to the
prescribed work scope.
In conducting this assessment and preparing the report, current guidelines for noise were referred to,
including Guidance for the Assessment of Environmental Factors – No. 8 - Environmental Noise – Draft
(EPA 2007) and the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulation 1997.
GHD accepts no responsibility for the integrity of the software coding of the approved acoustic model
(CadnaA) used.
GHD has prepared this Report on the basis of information provided by Grange, which GHD has not
independently verified or checked (“Unverified Information”) beyond the agreed scope of work.
GHD expressly disclaims responsibility in connection with the Unverified Information, including (but not
limited to) errors in, or omissions from, the Report, which were caused or contributed to by errors in, or
omissions from, the Unverified Information.
Subject to the paragraphs in this section of the Report, the opinions, conclusions and any
recommendations in this Report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the
time of preparation.
Bies D A and Hansen C H, 2003. Engineering Noise Control - 3rd Edition. London, 2003.
BoM (Bureau of Meteorology), 2011. Jacup (Jerramungup District), Western Australia April 2011 Daily
Weather Observations. Accessed via http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/dwo/IDCJDW6058.latest.shtml. 15
February 2011.
EPA (Environmental Protection Authority), 2007. Guidance for the Assessment of Environmental Factors
– No. 8 - Environmental Noise – Draft, Perth, May 2007.
Grange Resources/Sojitz, 2010. Southdown Magnetite and Kemaman Pellet Plant Project Prefeasibility
Study. Section 7 – Infrastructure – Western Australia. Perth, October 2010.
ISO Standards, 1996. ISO Standard 96132: 1996 Attenuation of Sound During Propagation Outdoors
Part 2: General Method of Calculation. Geneva, 1996.
RTA (Roads and Traffic Authority), 2001. Environmental Noise Management Manual, Sydney, December
2001.
WAPC (West Australian Planning Commission), 2009. State Planning Policy 5.4 – Road and Rail
Transport Noise and Freight Considerations in Land Use Planning. Accessed via
http://www.planning.wa.gov.au/Plans+and+policies/Publications/1992.aspx, 15 February 2011.
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Figure A1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0:00 0:00
0:00
3:00 3:00
3:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
15:00 15:00
15:00
09/02/2011
09/02/2011
09/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00 21:00
21:00
0:00 0:00
0:00
3:00 3:00
3:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
15:00 15:00
10/02/2011
15:00
10/02/2011
10/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00 21:00
21:00
0:00 0:00
0:00
3:00 3:00
3:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
LA1 (dB(A))
12:00 12:00
12:00
15:00 15:00
11/02/2011
11/02/2011
15:00
11/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
Precipitation (mm)
0:00 0:00
Wind Direction
3:00 3:00
3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
LA10 (dB(A))
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
15:00
12/02/2011
15:00
Date / Time
12/02/2011
Date / Time
12/02/2011
Date / Time
18:00
18:00 18:00
Noise logging results for Camp Riche campsite - Week 1 (9-15 February 2011)
21:00
21:00 21:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
13/02/2011
15:00
13/02/2011
15:00
13/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
14/02/2011
15:00
14/02/2011
15:00
14/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
15:00
15/02/2011
15:00
15/02/2011
15/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0
90
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
180
270
360
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Figure A2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
15:00
16/02/2011
15:00
16/02/2011
16/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
15:00
17/02/2011
17/02/2011
15:00
17/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
LA1 (dB(A))
12:00 12:00
15:00
18/02/2011
15:00
18/02/2011
15:00
18/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
Precipitation (mm)
0:00 0:00
3:00
Wind Direction
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
LA10 (dB(A))
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
15:00
19/02/2011
15:00
19/02/2011
Date / Time
19/02/2011
Date / Time
Date / Time
18:00
18:00 18:00
Noise logging results for Cape Riche campsite - Week 2 (16-22 February 2011)
21:00
21:00 21:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
20/02/2011
15:00
20/02/2011
15:00
20/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
21/02/2011
15:00
21/02/2011
15:00
21/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
15:00
22/02/2011
15:00
22/02/2011
22/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0
90
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
180
270
360
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Figure A3
0:00 0:00
0:00
3:00 3:00
3:00
6:00 6:00 6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
15:00 15:00
15:00
09/02/2011
09/02/2011
09/02/2011
18:00 18:00 18:00
21:00 21:00 21:00
0:00 0:00
0:00
3:00 3:00
3:00
6:00 6:00 6:00
9:00 9:00 9:00
12:00 12:00 12:00
15:00 15:00
15:00
10/02/2011
10/02/2011
10/02/2011
18:00 18:00 18:00
21:00 21:00 21:00
0:00 0:00 0:00
3:00 3:00 3:00
6:00 6:00 6:00
9:00 9:00 9:00
12:00 12:00
LA1 (dB(A))
12:00
15:00 15:00
11/02/2011
15:00
11/02/2011
11/02/2011
18:00 18:00 18:00
21:00 21:00 21:00
0:00
Precipitation (mm)
0:00 0:00
3:00 3:00
Wind Direction
3:00
6:00 6:00 6:00
9:00 9:00 9:00
LA10 (dB(A))
Noise logging results for Moir residence - Week 1 (9-15 February 2011)
12:00 12:00 12:00
15:00 15:00 15:00
12/02/2011
Date / Time
12/02/2011
Date / Time
12/02/2011
Date / Time
15:00
13/02/2011
13/02/2011
18:00 18:00 18:00
15:00
14/02/2011
14/02/2011
18:00 18:00 18:00
21:00 21:00 21:00
0:00 0:00 0:00
3:00 3:00 3:00
6:00 6:00 6:00
9:00 9:00 9:00
12:00 12:00 12:00
15:00 15:00 15:00
15/02/2011
15/02/2011
15/02/2011
18:00 18:00 18:00
21:00 21:00 21:00
0
90
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
180
270
360
Wind Direction (degrees) Hourly Precipitation (mm)
Air Temperature (°C) / Relative Humidity (%) Sound Pressure Level, dB(A)
Wind Speed (m/s)
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Figure A4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
15:00
16/02/2011
16/02/2011
15:00 18:00
16/02/2011
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00
3:00
3:00 6:00
6:00
6:00 9:00
9:00
9:00 12:00
12:00
12:00 15:00
15:00
17/02/2011
17/02/2011
15:00
17/02/2011
18:00
18:00
18:00 21:00
21:00
21:00 0:00
0:00
0:00 3:00
3:00
3:00 6:00
6:00
6:00 9:00
9:00
9:00 12:00
LA1 (dB(A))
12:00
12:00 15:00
15:00
18/02/2011
18/02/2011
15:00
18/02/2011
18:00
18:00
18:00 21:00
21:00
21:00 0:00
0:00
Precipitation (mm)
0:00 3:00
Wind Direction
3:00
3:00 6:00
6:00
6:00 9:00
LA10 (dB(A))
9:00
9:00 12:00
Noise logging results for Moir residence - Week 2 (16-22 February 2011)
12:00
12:00 15:00
15:00
19/02/2011
Date / Time
19/02/2011
15:00
Date / Time
19/02/2011
Date / Time
18:00 18:00
18:00 21:00
21:00
21:00
6:00 9:00
9:00
9:00 12:00
12:00
12:00 15:00
15:00
20/02/2011
20/02/2011
15:00
20/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
3:00 6:00
6:00
6:00 9:00
9:00
9:00 12:00
12:00
12:00 15:00
15:00
21/02/2011
21/02/2011
15:00
21/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00 21:00
21:00
21:00 0:00
0:00
0:00 3:00
3:00
3:00 6:00
6:00
6:00 9:00
9:00
9:00 12:00
12:00
12:00 15:00
15:00
22/02/2011
22/02/2011
15:00
22/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00 21:00
21:00
21:00
0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
90
180
270
360
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Figure A5
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
15:00
09/02/2011
15:00
09/02/2011
09/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
10/02/2011
15:00 15:00
10/02/2011
10/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
LA1 (dB(A))
12:00 12:00
15:00
11/02/2011
15:00 15:00
11/02/2011
11/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
Precipitation (mm)
0:00 0:00
3:00
Wind Direction
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
LA10 (dB(A))
9:00 9:00
12:00
Noise logging results for Lock residence - Week 1 (9-15 February 2011)
12:00 12:00
15:00
12/02/2011
15:00 15:00
Date / Time
Date / Time
12/02/2011
12/02/2011
Date / Time
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
13/02/2011
15:00 15:00
13/02/2011
13/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
14/02/2011
15:00 15:00
14/02/2011
14/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
15/02/2011
15:00 15:00
15/02/2011
15/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0
90
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
180
270
360
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Figure A6
0:00 0:00
0:00
3:00 3:00
3:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
15:00 15:00
15:00
16/02/2011
16/02/2011
16/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00 21:00
21:00
0:00 0:00
0:00
3:00 3:00
3:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
15:00 15:00
15:00
17/02/2011
17/02/2011
17/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00 21:00
21:00
0:00 0:00
0:00
3:00 3:00
3:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
12:00
LA1 (dB(A))
12:00 12:00
15:00 15:00
18/02/2011
15:00
18/02/2011
18/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00 21:00
21:00
0:00 0:00
0:00
Precipitation (mm)
3:00
Wind Direction
3:00 3:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00
LA10 (dB(A))
9:00 9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
Noise logging results for Lock residence - Week 2 (16-22 February 2011)
15:00
15:00 15:00
19/02/2011
Date / Time
Date / Time
19/02/2011
19/02/2011
Date / Time
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
15:00
20/02/2011
15:00 15:00
20/02/2011
20/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
15:00
21/02/2011
15:00 15:00
21/02/2011
21/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00 21:00
21:00
0:00 0:00
0:00
3:00 3:00
3:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
15:00 15:00
22/02/2011
15:00
22/02/2011
22/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00 21:00
21:00
0
90
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
180
270
360
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Figure A7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0:00 0:00
0:00
3:00
3:00 3:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
15:00
15:00 15:00
09/02/2011
09/02/2011
09/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00 3:00
3:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00 15:00
15:00
10/02/2011
10/02/2011
10/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00 0:00
0:00
3:00 3:00
3:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
12:00
LA1 (dB(A))
12:00 12:00
15:00 15:00
11/02/2011
15:00
11/02/2011
11/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00 21:00
21:00
0:00
Precipitation (mm)
0:00 0:00
3:00
Wind Direction
3:00 3:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00
LA10 (dB(A))
9:00 9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
Noise logging results for Turner residence - Week 1 (9-15 February 2011)
15:00 15:00
15:00
12/02/2011
Date / Time
12/02/2011
Date / Time
12/02/2011
Date / Time
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00 21:00
21:00
6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
15:00 15:00
13/02/2011
15:00
13/02/2011
13/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
15:00 15:00
14/02/2011
15:00
14/02/2011
14/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00 21:00
21:00
0:00 0:00
0:00
3:00 3:00
3:00
6:00 6:00
6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
15:00 15:00
15/02/2011
15:00
15/02/2011
15/02/2011
18:00 18:00
18:00
21:00 21:00
21:00
0
90
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
180
270
360
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Figure A8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0:00 0:00
0:00
3:00 3:00
3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00 9:00
9:00
12:00 12:00
12:00
15:00
15:00
16/02/2011
15:00
16/02/2011
16/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
15:00
17/02/2011
15:00
17/02/2011
17/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
LA1 (dB(A))
12:00 12:00
15:00
18/02/2011
15:00 15:00
18/02/2011
18/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
Precipitation (mm)
0:00 0:00
3:00
Wind Direction
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
LA10 (dB(A))
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
Noise logging results for Turner residence - Week 2 (16-22 February 2011)
15:00
19/02/2011
Date / Time
15:00
19/02/2011
Date / Time
19/02/2011
Date / Time
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
20/02/2011
15:00 15:00
20/02/2011
20/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
21/02/2011
15:00 15:00
21/02/2011
21/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
3:00
3:00 3:00
6:00
6:00 6:00
9:00
9:00 9:00
12:00
12:00 12:00
15:00
22/02/2011
15:00 15:00
22/02/2011
22/02/2011
18:00
18:00 18:00
21:00
21:00 21:00
0
90
180
270
360
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
dB Decibel is the unit that describes the sound pressure and sound power levels of a
noise source. It is a logarithmic scale referenced to the threshold of hearing.
dB(A) Unit used to measure ‘A-weighted’ sound pressure levels.
Hz Units for frequency are known as Hertz.
Impulsive noise An impulsive noise source has a short-term banging, clunking or explosive sound.
The quantitative definition of impulsiveness is:
A variation in the emission of a noise where the difference between LA Peak and LA Max
is more than 15 dB when determined for a single representative event.
Slow
LA Slow This is the noise level in decibels, obtained using A-weighting and S time weighting
as specified in AS1259.1-1990. Unless assessing modulation, all measurements use
the slow time weighting characteristic.
LA Fast This is the noise level in decibels, obtained using A-weighting and F time weighting
as specified in AS1259.1-1990. This is used when assessing the presence of
modulation only.
LA Peak This is the maximum reading in decibels using A-weighting and P time weighting as
specified in S1259.1-1990.
LA Max LA Max level is the maximum A-weighted noise level during a particular measurement.
LA 1 LA 1 level is the A-weighted noise level which is exceeded for 1% of the measurement
period and is considered to represent the average of the maximum noise levels
measured.
LA 10 LA 10 level is the A-weighted noise level which is exceeded for 10% of the
measurement period and is considered to represent the intrusive noise level.
LA 90 LA 90 level is the A-weighted noise level which is exceeded for 90% of the
measurement period and is considered to represent the background noise level.
LA Eq The equivalent steady state A-weighted sound level (‘equal energy’) in decibels
which, in a specified time period, contains the same acoustic energy as the time-
varying level during the same period. It is considered to represent the average noise
level.
LA Max assigned Means an assigned level which, measured as a LA Slow value, is not to be exceeded
level at any time.
LA 1 assigned Means an assigned level which, measured as a LA Slow value, is not to be exceeded
level for more than 1% of the representative assessment period.
Linear Sound levels measured without any weightings are referred to as ‘linear’ and the
units are expressed as dB(lin).
L Linear, Peak Maximum reading in decibels obtained using P-time-weighting characteristic as
specified in AS 1259.1-1990.
Maximum The level of noise above which most people occupying the space start to become
design sound dissatisfied with the level of noise.
level
Modulating A modulating source is regular, cyclic and audible and is present for at least 10% of
noise the measurement period. The quantitative definition of modulation is:
A variation in the emission of noise that -
5. Is more than 3 dB LA Fast or is more than 3 dB LA Fast in any one-third octave
band;
6. Is present for at least 10% of the representative assessment period; and
7. Is regular, cyclic and audible.
One-third Means a band of frequencies spanning one-third of an octave and having a centre
octave band frequency between 25 Hz and 20,000 Hz inclusive.
Rating The overall single-figure background level representing each assessment period
background (day/evening/night) over the whole monitoring period (as opposed to over each 24-
level (RBL) hour period used for the assessment background level). This is the level used for
assessment purposes. It is defined as the median value of:
– All the day assessment background levels over the monitoring period for the
day (07:00 to 19:00);
– All the evening assessment background levels over the monitoring period for
the evening (19:00 to 22:00); or
– All the night assessment background levels over the monitoring period for the
night (22:00 to 07:00).
Representative Means a period of time not less than 15 minutes and not exceeding four hours,
assessment determined by an inspector or authorised person to be appropriate for the
period assessment of a noise emission, having regard to the type and nature of the noise
emission.
Reverberation Of an enclosure, for a sound of a given frequency or frequency band, the time that
time would be required for the reverberantly decaying sound pressure level in the
enclosure to decrease by 60 decibels.
RMS Root mean square level; used to represent the average level of a wave form such as
vibration.
Satisfactory The level of noise that has been found to be acceptable by most people for the
design sound environment in question and also to be not intrusive.
level
Sound power Under normal conditions, a given sound source will radiate the same amount of
level (LW) energy, irrespective of its surroundings, being the sound power level. The sound
power level of a noise source cannot be directly measured using a sound level meter
but is calculated based on measured sound pressure levels at known distances.
Noise modelling incorporates source sound power levels as part of the input data.
Specific noise Relates to the component of the ambient noise that is of interest. This can be
referred to as the noise of concern or the noise of interest
Tonal noise A tonal noise source can be described as a source that has a distinctive noise
emission in one or more frequencies. An example would be whining or droning. The
quantitative definition of tonality is:
The presence in the noise emission of tonal characteristics where the difference
between -
8. The A-weighted sound pressure level in any one-third octave band; and
9. The arithmetic average of the A-weighted sound pressure levels in the two
adjacent one-third octave bands,
is greater than 3 dB when the sound pressure levels are determined as LA eq,T
levels where the time period T is greater than 10% of the representative
assessment period, or greater than 8 dB at any time when the sound pressure
levels are determined as LA Slow levels.
This is relatively common in most noise sources.
Vibration The RMS velocity of a vibration source over a specified time period, measured in
velocity level mm/s.