Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
This article is about the company. For the soft drink, see Pepsi.
PepsiCo
Indra Krishnamurthy Nooyi has been the chief executive of PepsiCo since 2006, and
the company's beverage distribution and bottling is undertaken primarily by
associated companies such as The Pepsi Bottling Group (NYSE: PBG) and Pepsi
Americas (NYSE: PAS). PepsiCo is a SIC 2080 (beverage) company.
Contents
[hide]
1 History
2 Corporate governance
2.1 Former top executives at
PepsiCo
3 Lobbying
4 Pepsi Music
5 PepsiCo brands
5.1 Partnerships
5.2 Discontinued lines
5.3 Former brands
5.4 Diversity
5.5 Tampering
6 Criticisms
6.1 PepsiCo in India
6.1.1 Soft drinks market in
India
6.2 Consumption patterns in
India
6.3 PepsiCo in Burma
6.4 PepsiCo in Israel
7 Pepsi Bottlers
8 See also
9 Notes and references
10 External links
[edit] History
Current members of the board of directors of PepsiCo are Indra Nooyi C.E.O., Robert
E. Allen, Dina Dublon, Victor Dzau, Ray Lee Hunt, Alberto Ibargüen, Arthur Martinez,
Steven Reinemund, Sharon Rockefeller, James Schiro, Franklin Thomas, Cynthia
Trudell, and River King.
On October 1, 2006, former Chief Financial Officer and President Indra Nooyi
replaced Steve Reinemund as chief executive officer. Nooyi remains the
corporation's president, and became Chairman of the Board in May 2007.
Steven Reinemund
Roger Enrico
D. Wayne Calloway
John Sculley
Michael H. Jordan
Donald M. Kendall
Christopher A. Sinclair
Alfred Steele
[edit] Lobbying
In the US, working with its competitor Coca Cola Company, PepsiCo is a major
lobbying force working to gain favorable legislation for the beverage industry. In
2005, PepsiCo spent $740,000 on lobbying, in 2006, $880,318, in 2007, $1 million,
and in 2008, $1,176,000. In 2009, lobbying expenses rose to $4.2 million or nearly a
300 percent increase. Much of the increased lobbying expenses are due to the
industry’s fight against increased taxes on soft drinks.[3] For 2009, PepsiCo has 31
lobbyists at 8 different firms lobbying on its behalf.[4]
Pepsi Music is a promotional music label that is seen on Yahoohoo. It has many
parts like the Pepsi Mic Pass, the most famous in Houston, Texas. It also contracts
artists to advertise with Pepsi and other PepsiCo products.
Pepsi Musica is seen on the Latino channel Mun2, on the show, Pepsi Musica.
Green Label Sound is Mountain Dew's record label that gives free downloads
promoting unsigned artists.
PepsiCo owns 5 different billion-dollar brands. These are Pepsi, Tropicana, Frito-Lay,
Quaker, and Gatorade. The company owns many other brands as well.
Pepsi, Caffeine-Free Pepsi, Diet Pepsi/Pepsi Light, Caffeine-Free Diet Pepsi, Caffeine-
Free Pepsi Light, Wild Cherry Pepsi, Pepsi Lime, Pepsi Max, Pepsi Twist and Pepsi
ONE.
Other U.S. carbonated soft drinks, including Mountain Dew, Crush, Mug Root Beer,
Sierra Mist, Tropicana Twister Soda and Frawg,
Other U.S. beverages, including Aquafina (Flavor Splash, Alive, and Twist/Burst),
Tava, Dole, Gatorade, Izze, AMP Energy, Propel Fitness Water, SoBe, Quaker Milk
Chillers, and Tropicana
Beverages marketed outside the U.S.: Alvalle, Concordia, Copella, Evervess, Fiesta,
Frui'Vita, Fruko, H2OH!, Ivi, Junkanoo, Kas, Loóza, Manzana Corona, Manzanita Sol,
Mirinda, Paso de los Toros (drink), Radical Fruit, San Carlos, Schwip Schwap, Shani,
Teem, Triple Kola, and Yedigun
In 2007, Nooyi spent $1.3 billion on healthier-alternative brands like Naked Juice, a
California maker of soy drinks and organic juice.
Pepsico has also recently acquired a 50% stake in U.S.-based Sabra Dipping
Company.[6]
[edit] Partnerships
PepsiCo also has formed partnerships with several brands it does not own, in order
to distribute these or market them with its own brands.
Frappuccino
Starbucks DoubleShot
Mandarin (license)
D&G (license)
Lipton Brisk
FRS[7]
Teem, Pepsi's answer to Sprite and 7up, discontinued after PepsiCo bought 7up.
All Sport, a line of sports drinks. All-Sport was lightly carbonated; in contrast, rivals
Gatorade and Coke-owned POWERade were non-carbonated. The 2001 purchase of
Quaker Oats (in effect acquiring Gatorade) made All Sport expendable, and the
brand was sold to another company.
Aspen Soda, an apple-flavored soft drink (late 1970s-early 80's)
FruitWorks: Flavors were Strawberry Melon, Peach Papaya, Tangerine Citrus, Apple
Raspberry, and Pink Lemonade. Two other flavors, Passion Orange and Guava Berry,
were available in Hawaii only.
Josta: launched 1995, "with Guarana," the first energy drink launched by a major
soft drink company in the US.
Matika: Run in August 2001, it was a tea/juice alternative beverage, sweetened with
cane sugar & containing Ginseng. Dragonfruit Potion, Magic Mombin, Mythical
Mango, Rising Starfruit, Skyhigh Berry
Miranda Lime: Launched in the second half of the 1990 decade(in India) but failed
PepsiCo owned a number of restaurant chains until it exited that business in 1997,
selling some, and spinning off others into a new company Tricon Global
Restaurants, now known as Yum! Brands, Inc.. PepsiCo also previously owned
several other brands that it later sold.
California Pizza Kitchen (bought 1992, sold back to original founders in 1997)
Chevys Fresh Mex (bought August 1993, sold May 1997 to J. W. Childs Equity
Partners)
East Side Mario's (United States franchises – bought December 1993, sold early
1997)
Hot 'n Now (bought in 1990, sold in 1997)
KFC (bought October 1986 from RJR Nabisco, spun off October 1997 to form TriCon,
later Yum! Brands)
Pizza Hut (bought in 1977, spun off October 1997 to form TriCon, later Yum! Brands)
Stolichnaya
Taco Bell (bought in 1978, spun off October 1997 to form TriCon, later Yum! Brands)
[edit] Diversity
PepsiCo received a 100 percent rating on the Corporate Equality Index released by
the LGBT-advocate group Human Rights Campaign starting in 2004, the third year
of the report.[8]
[edit] Tampering
During the summer of 1993, PepsiCo managed to stave off a runaway hoax
pertaining to alleged product tampering. Syringes were claimed to have been found
in cans of Diet Pepsi—first in Seattle, then throughout the U.S. over the next few
days. With the arrests of several of the fraudulent claimants, reports of found
hypodermic needles ceased. By June 15, 1993, consumers reported finding a bullet,
pins and screws in their Diet Pepsi. PepsiCo's subsequent handling of the situation
via carefully-worded press releases and VNRs is frequently cited as a textbook
example of how exactly to handle falsely spread rumors about a company.[9]
[edit] Criticisms
PepsiCo gained entry to India in 1988 by creating a joint venture with the Punjab
government-owned Punjab Agro Industrial Corporation (PAIC) and Voltas India
Limited. This joint venture marketed and sold Lehar Pepsi until 1991, when the use
of foreign brands was allowed; PepsiCo bought out its partners and ended the joint
venture in 1994.[10] Others claim that firstly Pepsi was banned from import in India,
in 1970, for having refused to release the list of its ingredients and in 1993, the ban
was lifted, with Pepsi arriving on the market shortly afterwards. These controversies
are a reminder of "India's sometimes acrimonious relationship with huge
multinational companies." Indeed, some argue that PepsiCo and The Coca-Cola
Company have "been major targets in part because they are well-known foreign
companies that draw plenty of attention."[11]
The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo angrily denied allegations that their products
manufactured in India contained toxin levels far above the norms permitted in the
developed world. But an Indian parliamentary committee, in 2004, backed up CSE's
findings and a government-appointed committee, is now trying to develop the
world's first pesticides standards for soft drinks. Coke and PepsiCo opposed the
move, arguing that lab tests aren't reliable enough to detect minute traces of
pesticides in complex drinks.
As of 2005, The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo together hold 95% market share
of soft-drink sales in India.[13] PepsiCo has also been accused by the Puthussery
panchayat in the Palakkad district in Kerala, India, of practicing "water piracy" due
to its role in exploitation of ground water resources resulting in scarcity of drinking
water for the panchayat's residents, who have been pressuring the government to
close down the PepsiCo unit in the village.[14]
In 2006, the CSE again found that soda drinks, including both Pepsi and Coca-Cola,
had high levels of pesticides in their drinks. Both PepsiCo and The Coca-Cola
Company maintain that their drinks are safe for consumption and have published
newspaper advertisements that say pesticide levels in their products are less than
those in other foods such as tea, fruit and dairy products.[15] In the Indian state of
Kerala, sale and production of Pepsi-Cola, along with other soft drinks, was banned
by the state government in 2006,[16] but this was reversed by the Kerala High
Court merely a month later.[17] Five other Indian states have announced partial
bans on the drinks in schools, colleges and hospitals.[18]
The major players in the soft drinks market in India are PepsiCo and Coca-Cola Co,
like elsewhere in the world. Coca-Cola acquired a number of local brands like Limca,
Gold Spot and Thums Up when it entered Indian market for the second time. Pepsi
Co’s soft drink portfolio also consists of Miranda and 7Up along with Pepsi. The
market share of each of the company is more or less the same, though there is a
conflict in the estimates quoted by different sources [19]
The major ingredient in a soft drink is water. It constitutes close to 90% of the soft
drink content. Added to this, the drink also contains sweeteners, Carbon dioxide,
Citric Acid/Malic acid, Colors, Preservatives, Anti Oxidants and other emulsifying
agents, etc.[19]
This section may contain original research. Please improve it by verifying the
claims made and adding references. Statements consisting only of original
research may be removed. More details may be available on the talk page.
(September 2009)
The Indian soft drinks market is not under any regulation. Prevention of Food
adulteration act 1954 does not include soft drinks. None of the BIS standards that
existed before August 2003 had any guidelines or set criteria for the residue levels
of pesticides in the soft drinks. But different lie agencies have set standards for the
residue levels of pesticides. The European Economic Community (EEC) sets the
maximum admissible concentration of individual pesticides and related products in
drinking water at 0.1 parts per billion to ensure that the toxicity is not dangerous to
human beings. For a few pesticides like aldrin, dieldin and heptachlor epoxide the
admissible limit is even more stringent, i.e., 0.03 parts per billion.[19]
PepsiCo formally began their investment in Burma in November 1991 when they
opened a bottling plant in the then-capital Rangoon, despite the call by Aung San
Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy for companies to avoid doing
business in Burma until it returned to democracy. The campaign against Pepsi was
initiated by the Asian-based Burma Rights Movement for Action. The campaign later
gained growing strength in the West as Burmese human rights groups focused on
campaigns against companies in Burma, including the oil giants Texaco, Unocal,
Amoco, and Petro-Canada.[21]
When Petro-Canada left Burma, Canadian and U.S. based Burmese democracy
groups sharpened their focus on PepsiCo. The campaign received a massive boost
when, in 1996, the Free Burma Coalition took the lead in forcing Pepsi out of
American universities. This included the scrapping of a multi-million dollar deal at
Harvard.
The campaign also spread to Europe, where the UK-based organization, Third World
First, adopted the boycott. In response, in 1996, PepsiCo attempted to step out of
the spotlight by selling its share of its Burmese joint venture to its partner but
retaining its Burmese franchise agreement. Aung San Suu Kyi responded, "As far as
we are concerned, Pepsi[Co] has not divested from Burma" and both human rights
and environmental groups continued the pressure on Pepsi. Eventually, with the
Burmese regime holding violent anti-democracy rallies and pressure from around
the world mounting, PepsiCo announced in January 1997 that it would cut all ties
with Burma. However, to this day, PepsiCo has not admitted that it was morally
wrong to invest in Burma as some other companies have upon leaving the country.
Until 1991 PepsiCo was not sold in Israel, for which it was criticised by many in the
United States who believed it was supporting the Arab boycott of Israel. PepsiCo
always denied this allegation, saying Israel was simply too small to support a
franchise. As a result, the Israeli market was taken over by Pepsi's rival Coca Cola,
and to this day Pepsi has a very small market share in Israel.[22][23]
Pepsi Stuff
Cola wars
Pepsi Challenge
Indra Nooyi
Caleb Bradham
Coca-Cola
[edit] Notes and references
^ http://www.pepsico.com/Company/Leadership.html#block_Indra K. Nooyi
^ http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?
year=2009&lname=PepsiCo+Inc&id=Center for Responsive Politics, Pepsi Co Inc,,
Nov 20, 2009
^ http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientlbs.php?lname=PepsiCo+Inc&year=2009
Center for Responsive Politics, PepsiCo Inc, Nov 20, 2009
^ "Coke, Pepsi lose fight over labels", Knight Ridder News, December 9, 2004
^ "Indian Coke, Pepsi Laced with Pesticides, Says NGO", Inter Press Service, August
5, 2003
^ "How a Global Web of Activists Gives Coke Problems in India", Wall Street Journal,
July 7, 2005
^ "Pepsi gets reprieve in Kerala case", Rediff India Abroad, April 11, 2007
^ Sanjoy Majumder (2006-08-09). "Kerala bans Coke and Pepsi". BBC News.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4776623.stm. Retrieved 2008-01-03.
^ K.C. Gopakumar (2006-09-23). "Kerala HC quashes ban on Coke and Pepsi". The
Hindu BusinessLine.
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2006/09/23/stories/2006092305340100.htm.
Retrieved 2008-01-03.
^ "A Historical Look at the Pepsico/Burma Boycott " in Boycott Quarterly (Summer
1997), online at
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Boycotts/Hx_PepsiBurmaBoy.html [1]
Official website
PepsiCo India
PepsiCo UK
PepsiCo France
PepsiCo Germany
PepsiCo Spain
PepsiCo Canada
http://www.sirpepsi.com/pepsi11.htm
Companies portal
[show]
v•d•e
PepsiCo, Incorporated
Pepsi · Diet Pepsi · Pepsi Max · Jazz Diet Pepsi · Pepsi ONE · Kas ·
Mountain Dew · Manzanita Sol · Mirinda · Mug Root Beer · Sierra
Mist · Slice · AMP Energy · Aquafina · Ethos Water (under
Pepsi-Cola
license) · Lipton (Brisk · Iced Tea) (under license) · No Fear
(under license) · Ocean Spray (under license) · Frappuccino
(under license) · Starbucks (under license) · SoBe · Shani
Hidden categories: Articles needing additional references from October 2009 | All
articles needing additional references | Articles that may contain original research
from September 2009 | All articles that may contain original research
Personal tools
Namespaces
Article
Discussion
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
Actions
Search
Top of Form
Special:Search
Search
Bottom of Form
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact Wikipedia
Toolbox
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Български
Dansk
Deutsch
Español
Français
한국어
िहनदी
Italiano
ಕನನಡ
ქართული
Magyar
Nederlands
日本語
Norsk (bokmål)
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Scots
Suomi
Svenska
తలుగు
中文
Contact us
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
"Convincing India that it needs Western junk has not been easy." 1
- A New Internationalist Magazine Article, commenting on Pepsi's struggle to enter India,
in August 1988.
A Letter to Pepsi
In 1988, the New York office of the President of the multi-billion cola company PepsiCo
received a letter from India. The company had been trying for some time to enter the Indian
market - without much success.
The letter was written by George Fernandes
(Fernandes), the General Secretary of one of the
country's leading political parties, Janata Dal. He
wrote, "I learned that you are coming here. I am
the one that threw Coca-Cola out, and we are soon
going to come back into the government. If you
come into the country, you have to remember that
the same fate awaits you as Coca-Cola."2 This
development did not seem to be a matter that
could be ignored. PepsiCo's arch-rival and the
world's number one cola company, Coca-Cola,
had indeed been forced to close operations and
leave India in 1977 after the Janata Dal came to
power.3 Even in the late 1980s, India had a closed
economy and government intervention in the
corporate sector was quite high.
However, multinational companies such as PepsiCo had been eyeing the Indian market for a long
time for a host of reasons. As the major market for PepsiCo, the US, seemed to be reaching
saturation levels, the option to expand on a global scale seemed to have become inevitable for
the company.
India was a lucrative destination since its vast
population offered a huge, untapped customer
base. During the late 1980s, the per capita
consumption of soft drinks in India was only three
bottles per annum as against 63 and 38 for Egypt
and Thailand respectively. Even its neighbor
Pakistan boasted of a per capita soft drink
consumption of 13 bottles. PepsiCo was also
encouraged by the fact that increasing
urbanization had already familiarized Indians with
leading global brands. Given these circumstances,
PepsiCo officials had been involved in hectic
lobbying with the Indian government to obtain
permission to begin operations in the country.
However, the company could not deny that many
political parties and factions were opposed to its
entry into the country. It had therefore become
imperative for PepsiCo to come up with a package
attractive enough for the Indian government.