Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for PIER-1

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 45 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-01

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Tip γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Final corrected
Corrected SPT
Total Length incl. Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden value after
Soil Layer Type of soil soil description Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For Ø
Scour depth (m) Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor Dilatancy
Overburden)
Correction (N'')

1 Non Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.81 2 0.12 1.40 3 3 28

2 Non Plastic 3 1.5 0.81 3 0.24 1.40 4 4 28
3 Non Plastic silty sand 4.5 1.5 0.81 5 0.36 1.34 7 7 29
4 Non Plastic 6 1.5 0.81 3 0.49 1.24 4 4 28
5 Non Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.81 4 0.61 1.17 5 5 28
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.81 3 0.73 1.00 3 3 28
7 Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.81 4 0.85 1.00 4 4 28
8 Plastic 12 1.5 0.81 3 0.97 1.00 3 3 28
9 Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.81 5 1.09 1.00 5 5 28
10 Plastic 15 1.5 0.81 3 1.22 1.00 3 3 28
11 Plastic silty with trace clay with sand 16.5 1.5 0.81 6 1.34 1.00 6 6 28
12 Plastic 18 1.5 0.81 5 1.46 1.00 5 5 28
13 Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.81 5 1.58 1.00 5 5 28
14 Plastic 21 1.5 0.81 6 1.70 1.00 6 6 9
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 11 1.87 1.00 11 11 9
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 14 1.99 1.00 14 14 9
17 Non Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 6 2.12 0.75 5 5 29
18 Non Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 9 2.24 0.73 7 7 29
19 Non Plastic silty sand 28.5 1.5 0.83 15 2.37 0.71 11 11 29
20 Non Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 18 2.49 0.70 13 13 29
21 Non Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 18 2.61 0.68 12 12 29
22 Non Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 20 2.74 0.66 13 13 29
23 Non Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 12 2.86 0.65 8 8 29
24 Non Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 24 2.99 0.64 15 15 32
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 39 3.11 0.62 24 20 32
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 23 3.24 0.61 14 14 32
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 27 3.36 0.60 16 16 32
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 33 3.49 0.58 19 17 32
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 49 3.61 0.57 28 22 32
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 52 3.74 0.56 29 22 33
 31 Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 25 3.86 1.00 25 25 0
32 Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 27 3.98 1.00 27 27 0
33 Plastic 49.5 1.5 0.83 28 4.11 1.00 28 28 0
34 Plastic 51 1.5 0.83 27 4.23 1.00 27 27 0
35 Plastic 52.5 1.5 0.83 25 4.36 1.00 25 25 0
36 Plastic 54 1.5 0.83 29 4.48 1.00 29 29 0
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 0.83 17 4.61 1.00 17 17 0
38 Plastic 57 1.5 0.83 19 4.73 1.00 19 19 0
39 Plastic 58.5 1.5 0.83 18 4.86 1.00 18 18 0
40 Plastic 60 1.5 0.83 20 4.98 1.00 20 20 0
41 Plastic 61.5 1.5 0.83 23 5.10 1.00 23 23 0
42 Plastic 63 1.5 0.83 29 5.23 1.00 29 29 0
43 Plastic 64.5 1.5 0.83 29 5.35 1.00 29 29 0
44 Plastic 66 1.5 0.83 29 5.48 1.00 29 29 0
45 Plastic 67.5 1.5 0.83 37 5.60 1.00 37 37 0
46 Non Plastic 69 1.5 0.83 34 5.73 0.42 14 14 30
47 Non Plastic 70.5 1.5 0.83 33 5.85 0.41 14 14 30
48 Non Plastic 72 1.5 0.83 37 5.98 0.40 15 15 32
49 Non Plastic 73.5 1.5 0.83 33 6.10 0.40 13 13 32
50 Non Plastic 75 1.5 0.83 64 6.23 0.39 25 20 32
51 Non Plastic 76.5 1.5 0.83 67 6.35 0.38 26 20 34
52 Non Plastic 78 1.5 0.83 71 6.47 0.38 27 21 34
53 Non Plastic 80 1.5 0.83 74 6.64 0.37 27 21 34
57 Non Plastic 81.5 1.5 0.909 50 7.41 0.33 17 16 31.69
58 Non Plastic 83 1.5 0.909 50 7.54 0.33 16 16 31.69
59 Non Plastic 84.5 1.5 0.909 50 7.68 0.32 16 16 31.69
60 Non Plastic 86 1.5 0.909 50 7.82 0.31 16 15 31.69

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2 8

Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3 12

Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.96 t/m 2

9.96
Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 510 T

Group Effect

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing
1156.26 510.42 Soil Types
Ultimate Capacity of Pile =
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5 Non plastic sil
(i) Working Capacity of Pile = 724 T Non plastic sil
Non plastic sil

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 667 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 667

 Recommended Pile Load 667 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 551 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ER-1

Eff.
δ α overburden pr.
Cohesion C (t/m )
2
K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
@ the center
of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
21 0 0 0.00 0.61 7.07 0.000
21 0 0 0.00 1.82 7.07 0.000
22 0 0 0.00 3.04 7.07 0.000
21 0 0 0.00 4.25 7.07 0.000
21 0 0 0.00 5.47 7.07 0.000
21 30 0.3 0.00 6.68 7.07 63.617
21 30 0.3 0.00 7.90 7.07 63.617
21 30 0.3 0.00 9.11 7.07 63.617
21 30 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07 63.617
21 30 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07 63.617
21 30 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07 63.617
21 30 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07 63.617
21 30 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07 63.617
7 30 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07 63.617
7 30 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07 63.617
7 30 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07 63.617
22 30 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07 63.617
22 30 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07 63.617
22 10 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 31.809
22 11 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 31.102
22 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
22 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
22 0 0 0.30 9.96 7.07 21.121
24 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
24 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
24 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
24 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
24 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
24 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
25 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
 0 18 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 38.170
0 19 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 40.291
0 20 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
0 19 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 40.291
0 18 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 38.170
0 20 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
0 11 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 31.102
0 12 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 31.385
0 11 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 31.102
0 13 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 32.162
0 15 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 34.459
0 20 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
0 20 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
0 20 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
0 20 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
23 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
23 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
24 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
24 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
24 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
24 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
24 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
24 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
24 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161

Total Friction Σ 1156 T

t/m2

Pile Length as per

Vertical Capacity (T)
PMG Div. (m)
69 499
70.5 509
72 519
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Rive

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of Bo

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 37.5 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P
Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.81 3 0.12 1.00 3

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.81 6 0.24 1.00 6
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.81 6 0.36 1.00 6
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.81 9 0.49 1.00 9
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.81 6 0.61 1.00 6
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.81 7 0.73 1.00 7
7 Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.81 4 0.85 1.00 4
8 Plastic 12 1.5 0.81 5 0.97 1.00 5
9 Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.81 7 1.09 1.00 7
10 Plastic 15 1.5 0.81 8 1.22 1.00 8
11 Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.81 8 1.34 1.00 8
12 Plastic 18 1.5 0.81 6 1.46 1.00 6
13 Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.81 5 1.58 1.00 5
14 Plastic 21 1.5 0.81 9 1.70 1.00 9
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 10 1.87 1.00 10
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 16 1.99 1.00 16
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 13 2.12 1.00 13
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 15 2.24 1.00 15
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 17 2.37 1.00 17
20 Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 20 2.49 1.00 20
21 Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 19 2.61 1.00 19
22 Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 21 2.74 1.00 21
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 23 2.86 1.00 23
24 Non Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 34 2.99 0.64 22
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 34 3.11 0.62 21
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 31 3.24 0.61 19
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 26 3.36 0.60 16
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 20 3.49 0.58 12
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 35 3.61 0.57 20
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 39 3.74 0.56 22
31 Non Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 32 3.86 0.55 18
32 Non Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 28 3.98 0.54 15
33 Non Plastic 49.5 1.5 0.83 33 4.11 0.53 17
34 Plastic 51 1.5 0.83 33 4.23 1.00 33
35 Plastic 52.5 1.5 0.83 27 4.36 1.00 27
36 Plastic 54 1.5 0.83 31 4.48 1.00 31
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 0.83 38 4.61 1.00 38
38 Plastic 57 1.5 0.83 35 4.73 1.00 35
39 Plastic 58.5 1.5 0.83 24 4.86 1.00 24
40 Plastic 60 1.5 0.83 25 4.98 1.00 25
41 Plastic 61.5 1.5 0.83 20 5.10 1.00 20
42 Plastic 63 1.5 0.83 22 5.23 1.00 22
43 Non Plastic 64.5 1.5 0.83 27 5.35 0.44 12
44 Non Plastic 66 1.5 0.83 30 5.48 0.43 13
45 Plastic 67.5 1.5 0.83 32 5.60 1.00 32
46 Plastic 69 1.5 0.83 25 5.73 1.00 25
47 Plastic 70.5 1.5 0.83 51 5.85 1.00 51
48 Plastic 72 1.5 0.83 49 5.98 1.00 49
49 Plastic 73.5 1.5 0.83 64 6.10 1.00 64
50 Plastic 75 1.5 0.83 62 6.23 1.00 62
51 Plastic 76.5 1.5 0.83 69 6.35 1.00 69
52 Plastic 78 1.5 0.83 71 6.47 1.00 71
53 Plastic 79.5 1.5 0.83 74 6.60 1.00 74
 57 Plastic 81 1.5 0.909 77 7.36 1.00 77
58 Plastic 82.5 1.5 0.909 81 7.50 1.00 81

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2

Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3

Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.96 t/m2

(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)

Qb Cb. Nc. Ap

Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line

Qb 318.086256

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1109.93 318.09

Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5

Working Capacity of Pile = 646

(i) T
Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 571
(ii) T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 571

Recommended Pile Load 571 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 463 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for PIER-2

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-01

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
3 0 0 1 1.00 0.00 0.61 7.07 7.069
6 0 0 3 1.00 0.00 1.82 7.07 21.206
6 0 0 3 1.00 0.00 3.04 7.07 21.206
9 0 0 5 0.85 0.00 4.25 7.07 30.041
6 0 0 3 1.00 0.00 5.47 7.07 21.206
7 0 0 4 1.00 0.00 6.68 7.07 28.274
4 0 0 2 1.00 0.00 7.90 7.07 14.137
5 0 0 3 1.00 0.00 9.11 7.07 21.206
7 0 0 4 1.00 0.00 9.96 7.07 28.274
8 0 0 4 1.00 0.00 9.96 7.07 28.274
8 0 0 4 1.00 0.00 9.96 7.07 28.274
6 0 0 3 1.00 0.00 9.96 7.07 21.206
5 0 0 3 1.00 0.00 9.96 7.07 21.206
9 0 0 5 0.85 0.00 9.96 7.07 30.041
10 0 0 6 0.75 0.00 9.96 7.07 31.809
16 0 0 10 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 31.809
13 0 0 8 0.55 0.00 9.96 7.07 31.102
15 0 0 10 0.45 0.00 9.96 7.07 31.809
17 0 0 11 0.40 0.00 9.96 7.07 31.102
20 0 0 13 0.35 0.00 9.96 7.07 32.162
19 0 0 12 0.37 0.00 9.96 7.07 31.385
21 0 0 14 0.33 0.00 9.96 7.07 32.162
23 0 0 15 0.33 0.00 9.96 7.07 34.459
18 31 23 0 0.00 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
18 31 23 0 0.00 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
17 31 23 0 0.00 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
15 31 23 0 0.00 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
12 30 23 0 0.00 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
18 31 23 0 0.00 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
18 31 23 0 0.00 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
16 31 23 0 0.00 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
15 31 23 0 0.00 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
16 31 23 0 0.00 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
33 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
27 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
31 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
38 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
35 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
24 0 0 16 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 33.929
25 0 0 17 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 36.050
20 0 0 13 0.35 0.00 9.96 7.07 32.162
22 0 0 14 0.33 0.00 9.96 7.07 32.162
12 30 23 0 0.00 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
13 30 23 0 0.00 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
32 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
25 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
51 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
49 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
64 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
62 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
69 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
71 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
74 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
 77 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
81 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412

Total Friction Σ 1110 T

12

Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)

Plastic sil 73.5 468

Plastic sil 75 483

Plastic sil 76.5 497

factor of 0.7
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Rive

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of Bo

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 48 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.81 3 0.12 1.00 3

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.81 5 0.24 1.00 5
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.81 4 0.36 1.00 4
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.81 5 0.49 1.00 5
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.81 4 0.61 1.00 4
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.81 4 0.73 1.00 4
7 Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.81 1 0.85 1.00 1
8 Plastic 12 1.5 0.81 2 0.97 1.00 2
9 Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.81 3 1.09 1.00 3
10 Plastic 15 1.5 0.81 5 1.22 1.00 5
11 Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.81 5 1.34 1.00 5
12 Plastic 18 1.5 0.81 5 1.46 1.00 5
13 Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.81 7 1.58 1.00 7
14 Plastic 21 1.5 0.81 12 1.70 1.00 12
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 9 1.87 1.00 9
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 10 1.99 1.00 10
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 12 2.12 1.00 12
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 9 2.24 1.00 9
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 11 2.37 1.00 11
20 Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 16 2.49 1.00 16
21 Non Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 20 2.61 0.68 14
22 Non Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 34 2.74 0.66 23
23 Non Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 31 2.86 0.65 20
24 Non Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 33 2.99 0.64 21
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 32 3.11 0.62 20
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 37 3.24 0.61 23
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 33 3.36 0.60 20
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 37 3.49 0.58 22
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 33 3.61 0.57 19
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 88 3.74 0.56 49
31 Non Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 61 3.86 0.55 34
32 Non Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 53 3.98 0.54 29
33 Non Plastic 49.5 1.5 0.83 45 4.11 0.53 24
34 Plastic 51 1.5 0.83 36 4.23 1.00 36
35 Plastic 52.5 1.5 0.83 32 4.36 1.00 32
36 Plastic 54 1.5 0.83 37 4.48 1.00 37
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 0.83 29 4.61 1.00 29
38 Plastic 57 1.5 0.83 31 4.73 1.00 31
39 Plastic 58.5 1.5 0.83 32 4.86 1.00 32
40 Plastic 60 1.5 0.83 36 4.98 1.00 36
41 Plastic 61.5 1.5 0.83 33 5.10 1.00 33
42 Plastic 63 1.5 0.83 34 5.23 1.00 34
43 Plastic 64.5 1.5 0.83 37 5.35 1.00 37
44 Plastic 66 1.5 0.83 40 5.48 1.00 40
45 Plastic 67.5 1.5 0.83 44 5.60 1.00 44
46 Plastic 69 1.5 0.83 35 5.73 1.00 35
47 Plastic 70.5 1.5 0.83 37 5.85 1.00 37
48 Plastic 72 1.5 0.83 40 5.98 1.00 40
49 Plastic 73.5 1.5 0.83 43 6.10 1.00 43
50 Plastic 75 1.5 0.83 50 6.23 1.00 50
51 Plastic 76.5 1.5 0.83 57 6.35 1.00 57
52 Plastic 78 1.5 0.83 57 6.47 1.00 57
53 Plastic 79.5 1.5 0.83 57 6.60 1.00 57
 57 Plastic 81 1.5 0.909 57 7.36 1.00 57
58 Plastic 82 1.5 0.909 57 7.45 1.00 57

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2

Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3

Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.96 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 510 T

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing
Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 594.91 510.42
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
(i) Working Capacity of Pile = 443 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 442 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 442

Recommended Pile Load 442 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 354 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for PIER-3

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-01

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
3 0 0 1 1 0.30 0.61 7.07 8.357
5 0 0 3 1 0.30 1.82 7.07 25.070
4 0 0 2 1 0.30 3.04 7.07 20.578
5 0 0 3 1 0.30 4.25 7.07 30.223
4 0 0 2 1 0.30 5.47 7.07 25.731
4 0 0 2 1 0.30 6.68 7.07 28.308
1 0 0 1 1 0.30 7.90 7.07 23.816
2 0 0 1 1 0.30 9.11 7.07 26.392
3 0 0 1 1 0.30 9.96 7.07 28.190
5 0 0 3 1 0.30 9.96 7.07 42.327
5 0 0 3 1 0.30 9.96 7.07 42.327
5 0 0 3 1 0.30 9.96 7.07 42.327
7 0 0 4 1 0.30 9.96 7.07 49.395
12 0 0 7 1 0.40 9.96 7.07 58.839
9 0 0 5 1 0.30 9.96 7.07 51.162
10 0 0 6 1 0.40 9.96 7.07 59.970
12 0 0 7 1 0.40 9.96 7.07 58.839
9 0 0 5 1 0.30 9.96 7.07 51.162
11 0 0 7 1 0.40 9.96 7.07 58.839
16 0 0 10 0.45 0.40 9.96 7.07 59.970
14 34 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
19 34 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
18 34 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
18 34 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
17 34 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
19 35 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
17 35 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
18 35 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
17 35 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
32 35 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
24 35 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
22 35 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
19 35 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
36 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
32 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
37 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
29 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
31 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
32 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
36 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
33 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
34 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
37 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
40 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
44 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
35 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
37 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
40 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
43 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
50 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
57 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
57 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
57 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
 57 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573
57 9 7 20 0.30 0.40 9.96 7.07 70.573

Total Friction Σ 595 T

12

9.96 t/m2

Pile Length Pile Length

Vertical
Soil Types as per GAD as per PMG
Capacity (T)
(m) Div. (m)
NP 48 541
NP 45 524

factor of 0.7
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Riv

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of B

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 48 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDG

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.81 4 0.12 1.00 4

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.81 7 0.24 1.00 7
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.81 6 0.36 1.00 6
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.81 4 0.49 1.00 4
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.81 4 0.61 1.00 4
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.81 6 0.73 1.00 6
7 Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.81 4 0.85 1.00 4
8 Plastic 12 1.5 0.81 6 0.97 1.00 6
9 Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.81 4 1.09 1.00 4
10 Plastic 15 1.5 0.81 4 1.22 1.00 4
11 Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.81 5 1.34 1.00 5
12 Plastic 18 1.5 0.81 6 1.46 1.00 6
13 Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.81 8 1.58 1.00 8
14 Plastic 21 1.5 0.81 9 1.70 1.00 9
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 11 1.87 1.00 11
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 24 1.99 1.00 24
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 19 2.12 1.00 19
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 12 2.24 1.00 12
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 13 2.37 1.00 13
20 Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 15 2.49 1.00 15
21 Non Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 20 2.61 0.68 14
22 Non Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 36 2.74 0.66 24
23 Non Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 27 2.86 0.65 18
24 Non Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 29 2.99 0.64 18
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 38 3.11 0.62 24
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 46 3.24 0.61 28
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 35 3.36 0.60 21
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 38 3.49 0.58 22
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 33 3.61 0.57 19
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 31 3.74 0.56 17
31 Non Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 27 3.86 0.55 15
32 Non Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 32 3.98 0.54 17
33 Non Plastic 49.5 1.5 0.83 28 4.11 0.53 15
34 Plastic 51 1.5 0.83 29 4.23 1.00 29
35 Plastic 52.5 1.5 0.83 26 4.36 1.00 26
36 Plastic 54 1.5 0.83 32 4.48 1.00 32
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 0.83 29 4.61 1.00 29
38 Plastic 57 1.5 0.83 28 4.73 1.00 28
39 Plastic 58.5 1.5 0.83 37 4.86 1.00 37
40 Plastic 60 1.5 0.83 30 4.98 1.00 30
41 Plastic 61.5 1.5 0.83 51 5.10 1.00 51
42 Plastic 63 1.5 0.83 65 5.23 1.00 65
43 Plastic 64.5 1.5 0.83 55 5.35 1.00 55
44 Plastic 66 1.5 0.83 50 5.48 1.00 50
45 Plastic 67.5 1.5 0.83 67 5.60 1.00 67
46 Plastic 69 1.5 0.83 59 5.73 1.00 59
47 Plastic 70.5 1.5 0.83 62 5.85 1.00 62
48 Plastic 72 1.5 0.83 66 5.98 1.00 66
49 Plastic 73.5 1.5 0.83 73 6.10 1.00 73
50 Plastic 75 1.5 0.83 75 6.23 1.00 75
51 Plastic 76.5 1.5 0.83 100 6.35 1.00 100
52 Plastic 78 1.5 0.83 100 6.47 1.00 100
53 Plastic 79.5 1.5 0.83 74 6.60 1.00 74
 54 Plastic 81 1.5 0.909 52 7.36 1.00 52
55 Plastic 82 1.5 0.909 52 7.45 1.00 52

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2

Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3

Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.96 t/m2

(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)

Qb Cb. Nc. Ap

Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line

318.086256
Qb

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing
Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1128.44 318.09
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
(i) Working Capacity of Pile = 655 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 579 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 579

Recommended Pile Load 579 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 486 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
dge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ng Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for PIER-4

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-01

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
4 0 0 1 1 0.00 0.61 7.07 7.069
7 0 0 3 1 0.00 1.82 7.07 21.206
6 0 0 2 1 0.00 3.04 7.07 14.137
4 0 0 3 1 0.00 4.25 7.07 21.206
4 0 0 2 1 0.00 5.47 7.07 14.137
6 0 0 2 1 0.00 6.68 7.07 14.137
4 0 0 1 1 0.00 7.90 7.07 7.069
6 0 0 1 1 0.00 9.11 7.07 7.069
4 0 0 1 1 0.00 9.96 7.07 7.069
4 0 0 3 1 0.00 9.96 7.07 21.206
5 0 0 3 1 0.00 9.96 7.07 21.206
6 0 0 3 1 0.00 9.96 7.07 21.206
8 0 0 4 1 0.00 9.96 7.07 28.274
9 0 0 7 0.62 0.00 9.96 7.07 30.678
11 0 0 5 0.85 0.40 9.96 7.07 58.203
24 0 0 6 0.75 0.40 9.96 7.07 59.970
19 0 0 7 0.62 0.40 9.96 7.07 58.839
12 0 0 5 0.85 0.40 9.96 7.07 58.203
13 0 0 7 0.62 0.40 9.96 7.07 58.839
15 0 0 10 0.45 0.40 9.96 7.07 59.970
14 34 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
19 34 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
16 34 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
17 34 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
19 34 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
22 23 17 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
18 23 17 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
19 23 17 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
17 23 17 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
16 23 17 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
15 23 17 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
16 23 17 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
15 35 26 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
29 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
26 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
32 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
29 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
28 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
37 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
30 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
51 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
65 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
55 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
50 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
67 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
59 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
62 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
66 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
73 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
75 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
100 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
100 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
74 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
 52 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
52 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07 42.412
Total Friction Σ 1128 T

Zc / d 8

12

9.96 t/m2

Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
Plastic soil 61.5 441

Plastic soil 63 456

Plastic soil 66 486

ctor of 0.7
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Rive

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of Bor

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 48 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.81 2 0.12 1.00 2

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.81 3 0.24 1.00 3
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.81 4 0.36 1.00 4
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.81 4 0.49 1.00 4
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.81 3 0.61 1.00 3
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.81 4 0.73 1.00 4
7 Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.81 6 0.85 1.00 6
8 Plastic 12 1.5 0.81 7 0.97 1.00 7
9 Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.81 13 1.09 1.00 13
10 Plastic 15 1.5 0.81 13 1.22 1.00 13
11 Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.81 6 1.34 1.00 6
12 Plastic 18 1.5 0.81 7 1.46 1.00 7
13 Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.81 5 1.58 1.00 5
14 Plastic 21 1.5 0.81 4 1.70 1.00 4
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 4 1.87 1.00 4
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 6 1.99 1.00 6
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 7 2.12 1.00 7
18 Non Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 31 2.24 0.73 23
19 Non Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 25 2.37 0.71 18
20 Non Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 25 2.49 0.70 17
21 Non Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 23 2.61 0.68 16
22 Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 14 2.74 1.00 14
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 18 2.86 1.00 18
24 Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 17 2.99 1.00 17
25 Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 15 3.11 1.00 15
26 Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 20 3.24 1.00 20
27 Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 32 3.36 1.00 32
28 Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 33 3.49 1.00 33
29 Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 39 3.61 1.00 39
30 Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 43 3.74 1.00 43
31 Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 38 3.86 1.00 38
32 Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 44 3.98 1.00 44

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2

Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3

Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 7.47 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 462 T

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing
Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1322.36 462.34
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
 (i) Working Capacity of Pile = 793 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 714 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 714

Recommended Pile Load 714 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.67

Q allowable group 575 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ing Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for PIER-12

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-03

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
2 0 0 1 1 0.30 0.61 7.07 8.357
3 0 0 1 1 0.30 1.82 7.07 10.933
4 0 0 2 1 0.30 3.04 7.07 20.578
4 0 0 2 1 0.30 4.25 7.07 23.155
3 0 0 1 1 0.30 5.47 7.07 18.663
4 0 0 2 1 0.30 6.68 7.07 28.308
6 0 0 3 1 0.30 7.47 7.07 37.046
7 0 0 4 1 0.30 7.47 7.07 44.115
13 0 0 8 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 52.223
13 0 0 8 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 52.223
6 0 0 3 1 0.30 7.47 7.07 37.046
7 0 0 4 1 0.30 7.47 7.07 44.115
5 7 5 3 1 0.30 7.47 7.07 37.046
4 7 5 2 1.00 0.30 7.47 7.07 29.978
4 7 5 2 1.00 0.30 7.47 7.07 29.978
6 7 5 3 1.00 0.30 7.47 7.07 37.046
7 7 5 4 1.00 0.30 7.47 7.07 44.115
19 27 20 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
16 27 20 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
16 27 20 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
15 27 20 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
14 20 15 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
18 20 15 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
17 20 15 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
15 20 15 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
20 20 15 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
32 20 15 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
33 20 15 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
39 20 15 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
43 20 15 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
38 20 15 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
44 20 15 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162

Total Friction Σ 1322 T

7.47 t/m2
factor of 0.67
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Rive

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of Bor

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 48 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.81 1 0.12 1.00 1

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.81 3 0.24 1.00 3
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.81 3 0.36 1.00 3
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.81 3 0.49 1.00 3
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.81 5 0.61 1.00 5
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.81 5 0.73 1.00 5
7 Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.81 10 0.85 1.00 10
8 Plastic 12 1.5 0.81 12 0.97 1.00 12
9 Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.81 8 1.09 1.00 8
10 Plastic 15 1.5 0.81 9 1.22 1.00 9
11 Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.81 11 1.34 1.00 11
12 Plastic 18 1.5 0.81 4 1.46 1.00 4
13 Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.81 10 1.58 1.00 10
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 0.81 12 1.70 0.82 10
15 Non Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 19 1.87 0.79 15
16 Non Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 20 1.99 0.77 15
17 Non Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 21 2.12 0.75 16
18 Non Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 26 2.24 0.73 19
19 Non Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 28 2.37 0.71 20
20 Non Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 29 2.49 0.70 20
21 Non Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 31 2.61 0.68 21
22 Non Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 44 2.74 0.66 29
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 20 2.86 1.00 20
24 Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 24 2.99 1.00 24
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 25 3.11 0.62 16
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 26 3.24 0.61 16
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 37 3.36 0.60 22
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 44 3.49 0.58 26
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 39 3.61 0.57 22
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 37 3.74 0.56 21
31 Non Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 45 3.86 0.55 25
32 Non Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 47 3.98 0.54 25

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2

Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3

Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 7.47 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 391 T

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing
Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1019.23 390.77
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
 (i) Working Capacity of Pile = 621 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 564 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 564

Recommended Pile Load 564 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.67

Q allowable group 453 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ing Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for PIER-13

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-03

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
1 0 0 1 1 0.30 0.61 7.07 8.357
3 0 0 1 1 0.30 1.82 7.07 10.933
3 0 0 1 1 0.30 3.04 7.07 13.510
3 0 0 1 1 0.30 4.25 7.07 16.086
5 0 0 3 1 0.30 5.47 7.07 32.800
5 0 0 3 1 0.30 6.68 7.07 35.376
10 0 0 6 0.75 0.40 7.47 7.07 52.930
12 0 0 7 0.62 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.799
8 0 0 4 1 0.30 7.47 7.07 44.115
9 0 0 5 0.85 0.30 7.47 7.07 45.882
11 0 0 7 0.62 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.799
4 0 0 2 1 0.30 7.47 7.07 29.978
10 0 0 6 0.75 0.40 7.47 7.07 52.930
10 0 0 6 0.75 0.30 7.47 7.07 47.649
15 0 0 10 0.45 0.40 7.47 7.07 52.930
15 0 0 10 0.45 0.40 7.47 7.07 52.930
15 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
17 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
17 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
18 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
18 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
22 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
20 0 0 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
24 0 0 5 0.85 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.162
15 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
15 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
19 28 21 0.5 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 24.655
20 28 21 0.5 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 24.655
19 28 21 0.5 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 24.655
18 28 21 0.5 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 24.655
20 28 21 0.5 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 24.655
20 28 21 0.5 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 24.655

Total Friction Σ 1019 T

7.47 t/m2
factor of 0.67
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Rive

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of Bor

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 48 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.81 3 0.12 1.00 3

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.81 5 0.24 1.00 5
3 Non Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.81 4 0.36 1.34 5
4 Non Plastic 6 1.5 0.81 3 0.49 1.24 4
5 Non Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.81 4 0.61 1.17 5
6 Non Plastic 9 1.5 0.81 5 0.73 1.11 6
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.81 8 0.85 1.06 8
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 0.81 9 0.97 1.01 9
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.81 7 1.09 0.97 7
10 Plastic 15 1.5 0.81 14 1.22 1.00 14
11 Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.81 10 1.34 1.00 10
12 Plastic 18 1.5 0.81 7 1.46 1.00 7
13 Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.81 8 1.58 1.00 8
14 Plastic 21 1.5 0.81 12 1.70 1.00 12
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 10 1.87 1.00 10
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 11 1.99 1.00 11
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 13 2.12 1.00 13
18 Non Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 24 2.24 0.73 18
19 Non Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 22 2.37 0.71 16
20 Non Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 21 2.49 0.70 15
21 Non Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 24 2.61 0.68 16
22 Non Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 23 2.74 0.66 15
23 Non Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 35 2.86 0.65 23
24 Non Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 40 2.99 0.64 25
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 32 3.11 0.62 20
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 36 3.24 0.61 22
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 34 3.36 0.60 20
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 31 3.49 0.58 18
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 21 3.61 0.57 12
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 20 3.74 0.56 11
31 Non Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 23 3.86 0.55 13
32 Non Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 24 3.98 0.54 13

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2

Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3

Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 7.47 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 391 T

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing
Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 858.22 390.77
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
 (i) Working Capacity of Pile = 541 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 500 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 500

Recommended Pile Load 500 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.67

Q allowable group 399 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ing Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for PIER-14

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-03

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
3 0 0 1 1 0.30 0.61 7.07 8.357
5 0 0 1 1 0.30 1.82 7.07 10.933
5 20 15 0 0 0.30 3.04 7.07 6.441
4 20 15 0 0 0.30 4.25 7.07 9.018
5 20 15 0 0 0.30 5.47 7.07 11.594
6 20 15 0 0 0.30 6.68 7.07 14.171
8 20 15 0 0 0.30 7.47 7.07 15.841
9 20 15 0 0 0.30 7.47 7.07 15.841
7 20 15 0 0 0.30 7.47 7.07 15.841
14 6 5 4 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 49.395
10 6 5 4 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 49.395
7 6 5 4 1 0.30 7.47 7.07 44.115
8 6 5 4 1 0.30 7.47 7.07 44.115
12 6 5 4 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 49.395
10 6 5 4 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 49.395
11 6 5 4 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 49.395
13 6 5 4 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 49.395
16 0 0 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
15 32 24 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
15 32 24 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
16 32 24 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
15 32 24 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
19 32 24 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
20 27 20 0.8 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 26.776
17 27 20 0.8 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 26.776
18 27 20 0.8 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 26.776
18 27 20 0.8 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 26.776
17 27 20 0.8 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 26.776
12 27 20 0.8 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 26.776
11 27 20 0.8 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 26.776
13 27 20 0.8 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 26.776
13 27 20 0.5 1 0.40 7.47 7.07 24.655

Total Friction Σ 858 T

7.47 t/m2
factor of 0.67
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge ov

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Cap

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 55 m As per GAD Drawing no

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Tip γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length
Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil Soil description incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.81 4 0.12 1.00

silty with clay
2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.81 7 0.24 1.00
3 Non Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.81 1 0.36 1.34
4 Non Plastic 6 1.5 0.81 2 0.49 1.24
5 Non Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.81 2 0.61 1.17
6 Non Plastic 9 1.5 0.81 3 0.73 1.11
sandy silty with trace
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.81 3 0.85 1.06
clay
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 0.81 4 0.97 1.01
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.81 5 1.09 0.97
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 0.81 8 1.22 0.94
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.81 6 1.34 0.90
12 Plastic 18 1.5 0.81 8 1.46 1.00
13 Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.81 7 1.58 1.00
14 Plastic 21 1.5 0.81 11 1.70 1.00
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 9 1.87 1.00
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 10 1.99 1.00
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 12 2.12 1.00
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 14 2.24 1.00
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 15 2.37 1.00
20 Plastic stiff to very stiff low to 30 1.5 0.83 19 2.49 1.00
medium plasticity
21 Plastic ,clayey silt 31.5 1.5 0.83 19 2.61 1.00
22 Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 17 2.74 1.00
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 19 2.86 1.00
24 Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 24 2.99 1.00
25 Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 21 3.11 1.00
26 Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 25 3.24 1.00
27 Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 23 3.36 1.00
28 Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 28 3.49 1.00
29 Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 33 3.61 1.00
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 29 3.74 0.56
31 Non Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 39 3.86 0.55
32 Non Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 53 3.98 0.54
33 Non Plastic 49.5 1.5 0.83 34 4.11 0.53
silty sand
34 Non Plastic 51 1.5 0.83 31 4.23 0.52
35 Non Plastic 52.5 1.5 0.83 29 4.36 0.51
36 Non Plastic 54 1.5 0.83 29 4.48 0.50
37 Non Plastic 55.5 1.5 0.83 18 4.61 0.49

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2

Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3

Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.96 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 510 T

(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)
Qb Cb. Nc. Ap
Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line
Qb 190.8517537056 701

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1082.94 701.27

Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5

(i) Working Capacity of Pile = 742 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 714 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 714

Recommended Pile Load 714 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 579 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
AIRA Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

Carrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for PIER-15

AD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-03

Final corrected Eff.

Corrected SPT
value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
( N' ) Value (For Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Overburden)
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi Asi
4 4 0 0 1 1 0.30 0.61 7.07
7 7 0 0 1 1 0.30 1.82 7.07
1 1 20 15 0 0 0.30 3.04 7.07
2 2 20 15 0 0 0.30 4.25 7.07
2 2 20 15 0 0 0.30 5.47 7.07
3 3 20 15 0 0 0.30 6.68 7.07
3 3 20 15 0 0 0.30 7.90 7.07
4 4 20 15 0 0 0.30 9.11 7.07
5 5 20 15 0 0 0.30 9.96 7.07
7 7 20 15 0 0 0.30 9.96 7.07
5 5 20 15 0 0 0.30 9.96 7.07
8 8 9 7 4 1 0.30 9.96 7.07
7 7 9 7 4 1 0.30 9.96 7.07
11 11 9 7 5 1 0.40 9.96 7.07
9 9 9 7 5 1 0.30 9.96 7.07
10 10 9 7 5 1 0.40 9.96 7.07
12 12 9 7 6 1 0.40 9.96 7.07
14 14 9 7 7 1 0.40 9.96 7.07
15 15 9 7 8 1 0.40 9.96 7.07
19 19 9 7 10 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
19 19 9 7 10 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
17 17 9 7 9 1 0.40 9.96 7.07
19 19 9 7 10 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
24 24 9 7 12 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
21 21 9 7 11 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
25 25 9 7 13 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
23 23 9 7 12 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
28 28 9 7 14 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
33 33 9 7 16 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
16 16 26 20 1 1 0.40 9.96 7.07
21 18 26 20 1 1 0.40 9.96 7.07
29 22 26 20 1 1 0.40 9.96 7.07
18 16 26 26 1 1 0.40 9.96 7.07
16 16 26 20 1 1.00 0.40 9.96 7.07
15 15 26 20 1 1.00 0.40 9.96 7.07
15 15 26 20 1 1.00 0.40 9.96 7.07
9 9 26 20 1 1.00 0.30 9.96 7.07

Total Friction Σ

12

9.96 t/m2
Guide line
 Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
Non plastic 40 579
Non plastic 45 581
plastic 50 614
plastic 55 656

or of 0.7
 Friction (Tons)

(αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
8.357
10.933
6.441
9.018
11.594
14.171
16.747
19.324
21.121
21.121
21.121
49.395
49.395
58.203
51.162
58.203
59.970
58.839
59.263
59.970
59.970
59.970
59.970
59.546
59.263
60.323
59.546
60.323
62.090
31.696
31.696
31.696
31.696
31.696
31.696
31.696
24.655

1083 T
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 52 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIR

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length
soil Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT
description Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.81 3 0.12 1.00

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.81 6 0.24 1.00
3 Plastic 4.5 medium 1.5 0.81 3 0.36 1.00
plasticity silt
4 Plastic 6 with clay 1.5 0.81 4 0.49 1.00
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.81 3 0.61 1.00
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.81 2 0.73 1.00
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.81 6 0.85 1.06
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 0.81 9 0.97 1.01
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.81 7 1.09 0.97
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 0.81 8 1.22 0.94
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.81 12 1.34 0.90
silty sand
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 0.81 17 1.46 0.88
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.81 15 1.58 0.85
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 0.81 16 1.70 0.82
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 15 1.87 1.00
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 15 1.99 1.00
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 11 2.12 1.00
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 11 2.24 1.00
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 11 2.37 1.00
20 Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 16 2.49 1.00
21 Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 21 2.61 1.00
22 Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 13 2.74 1.00
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 22 2.86 1.00
24 Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 19 2.99 1.00
25 Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 17 3.11 1.00
26 Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 15 3.24 1.00
27 Plastic 40.5 medium 1.5 0.83 25 3.36 1.00
plasticity silt
28 Plastic 42 with clay 1.5 0.83 36 3.49 1.00
29 Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 50 3.61 1.00
30 Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 37 3.74 1.00
31 Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 22 3.86 1.00
32 Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 25 3.98 1.00
33 Plastic 49.5 1.5 0.83 16 4.11 1.00
34 Plastic 51 1.5 0.83 19 4.23 1.00
35 Plastic 52.5 1.5 0.83 19 4.36 1.00
36 Plastic 54 1.5 0.83 20 4.48 1.00
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 0.83 36 4.61 1.00
38 Plastic 57 1.5 0.83 40 4.73 1.00

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2

Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3

Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.96 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 510 T

(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)
Qb Cb. Nc. Ap

Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line

Qb 286.277631 797

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing
Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1125.96 796.70
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
(i) Working Capacity of Pile = 791 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 769 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 769

Recommended Pile Load 769 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 622 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
 of PAIRA Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

Load Carrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for PIER-24

ut steel liner

AD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-05

Final corrected Eff.

Corrected SPT
value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
( N' ) Value (For Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Overburden)
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi Asi
3 3 0 0 2 1 0.00 0.61 7.07
6 6 0 0 3 1 0.00 1.82 7.07
3 3 0 0 2 1 0.00 3.04 7.07
4 4 0 0 2 1 0.00 4.25 7.07
3 3 0 0 2 1 0.00 5.47 7.07
2 2 0 0 1 1 0.00 6.68 7.07
6 6 28 21 0 0 0.30 7.90 7.07
9 9 28 21 0 0 0.30 9.11 7.07
7 7 28 21 0 0 0.30 9.96 7.07
7 7 28 21 0 0 0.30 9.96 7.07
11 11 28 21 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
15 15 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
13 13 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
13 13 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
15 15 30 23 0 0.00 0.40 9.96 7.07
15 15 0 0 8 0.55 0.00 9.96 7.07
11 11 0 0 6 0.75 0.00 9.96 7.07
11 11 0 0 6 0.75 0.00 9.96 7.07
11 11 0 0 6 0.75 0.00 9.96 7.07
16 16 0 0 8 0.55 0.00 9.96 7.07
21 21 0 0 11 0.40 0.00 9.96 7.07
13 13 0 0 7 0.62 0.00 9.96 7.07
22 22 0 0 11 0.40 0.00 9.96 7.07
19 19 0 0 10 0.45 0.00 9.96 7.07
17 17 0 0 8 0.55 0.00 9.96 7.07
15 15 0 0 8 0.55 0.00 9.96 7.07
25 25 0 0 13 0.35 0.00 9.96 7.07
36 36 7 5 20 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
50 50 7 5 20 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
37 37 7 5 20 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
22 22 0 0 15 0.33 0.00 9.96 7.07
25 25 0 0 15 0.33 0.00 9.96 7.07
16 16 0 0 8 0.55 0.00 9.96 7.07
19 19 0 0 10 0.45 0.00 9.96 7.07
19 19 0 0 10 0.45 0.00 9.96 7.07
20 20 0 0 10 0.45 0.00 9.96 7.07
36 36 0 0 18 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07
40 40 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 9.96 7.07

Total Friction Σ

12

9.96 t/m2
Guide line
 Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
plastic 40 443
plastic 45 599
plastic 50 530
plastic 55 622

d by a factor of 0.7
 Friction (Tons)

(αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
14.137
21.206
14.137
14.137
14.137
7.069
16.747
19.324
21.121
21.121
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
31.102
31.809
31.809
31.809
31.102
31.102
30.678
31.102
31.809
31.102
31.102
32.162
70.573
70.573
70.573
34.459
34.459
31.102
31.809
31.809
31.809
38.170
42.412

1126 T
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Rive

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of Bor

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 70.5 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P
Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.81 3 0.12 1.00 3

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.81 5 0.24 1.00 5
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.81 6 0.36 1.00 6
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.81 6 0.49 1.00 6
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.81 5 0.61 1.00 5
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.81 6 0.73 1.00 6
7 Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.81 8 0.85 1.00 8
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 0.81 9 0.97 1.01 9
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.81 8 1.09 0.97 8
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 0.81 10 1.22 0.94 9
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.81 12 1.34 0.90 11
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 0.81 15 1.46 0.88 13
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.81 16 1.58 0.85 14
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 0.81 18 1.70 0.82 15
15 Non Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 10 1.87 0.79 8
16 Non Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 9 1.99 0.77 7
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 14 2.12 1.00 14
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 16 2.24 1.00 16
19 Non Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 19 2.37 0.71 14
20 Non Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 24 2.49 0.70 17
21 Non Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 26 2.61 0.68 18
22 Non Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 29 2.74 0.66 19
23 Non Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 27 2.86 0.65 18
24 Non Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 20 2.99 0.64 13
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 24 3.11 0.62 15
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 26 3.24 0.61 16
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 26 3.36 0.60 16
28 Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 19 3.49 1.00 19
29 Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 20 3.61 1.00 20
30 Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 32 3.74 1.00 32
31 Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 27 3.86 1.00 27
32 Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 19 3.98 1.00 19
33 Plastic 49.5 1.5 0.83 17 4.11 1.00 17
34 Plastic 51 1.5 0.83 17 4.23 1.00 17
35 Plastic 52.5 1.5 0.83 15 4.36 1.00 15
36 Plastic 54 1.5 0.83 18 4.48 1.00 18
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 0.83 20 4.61 1.00 20
38 Plastic 57 1.5 0.83 21 4.73 1.00 21
39 Plastic 58.5 1.5 0.83 33 4.86 1.00 33
40 Plastic 60 1.5 0.83 30 4.98 1.00 30
41 Plastic 61.5 1.5 0.83 34 5.10 1.00 34
42 Plastic 63 1.5 0.83 39 5.23 1.00 39
43 Plastic 64.5 1.5 0.83 34 5.35 1.00 34
44 Plastic 66 1.5 0.83 32 5.48 1.00 32
45 Plastic 67.5 1.5 0.83 41 5.60 1.00 41
46 Plastic 69 1.5 0.83 38 5.73 1.00 38
47 Plastic 70.5 1.5 0.83 44 5.85 1.00 44

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

 Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m
Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2

Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3

Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 7.47 t/m2

(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)

Qb Cb. Nc. Ap

Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line

Qb 318.086256

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing
Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1127.21 318.09
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
(i) Working Capacity of Pile = 654 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 578 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 578

Recommended Pile Load 578 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 485 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ing Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for PIER-25

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-05

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
3 0 0 1 1 0.00 0.61 7.07 7.069
5 0 0 3 1 0.00 1.82 7.07 21.206
6 0 0 3 1 0.00 3.04 7.07 21.206
6 0 0 3 1 0.00 4.25 7.07 21.206
5 0 0 3 1 0.00 5.47 7.07 21.206
6 0 0 3 1 0.00 6.68 7.07 21.206
8 0 0 4 1 0.00 7.47 7.07 28.274
9 20 15 0 0 0.30 7.47 7.07 15.841
8 20 15 0 0 0.30 7.47 7.07 15.841
9 20 15 0 0 0.30 7.47 7.07 15.841
11 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
13 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
14 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
15 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
8 20 15 0 0 0.30 7.47 7.07 15.841
7 20 15 0 0 0.30 7.47 7.07 15.841
14 0 0 10 0.45 0.00 7.47 7.07 31.809
16 0 0 10 0.45 0.00 7.47 7.07 31.809
14 28 21 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
16 28 21 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
16 28 21 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
17 28 21 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
16 28 21 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
13 28 21 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
15 28 21 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
15 28 21 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
15 28 21 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
19 0 0 12 0.37 0.00 7.47 7.07 31.385
20 0 0 13 0.35 0.00 7.47 7.07 32.162
32 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
27 0 0 18 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 38.170
19 0 0 12 0.37 0.00 7.47 7.07 31.385
17 0 0 11 0.40 0.00 7.47 7.07 31.102
17 0 0 11 0.40 0.00 7.47 7.07 31.102
15 0 0 10 0.45 0.00 7.47 7.07 31.809
18 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
20 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
21 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
33 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
30 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
34 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
39 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
34 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
32 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
41 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
38 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
44 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412

Total Friction Σ 1127 T

 6

7.47 t/m2

Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
plastic 67.5 456
plastic 69 471
plastic 70.5 485

factor of 0.7
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Rive

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of Bor

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 48 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.81 2 0.12 1.00 2

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.81 2 0.24 1.00 2
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.81 2 0.36 1.00 2
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.81 3 0.49 1.00 3
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.81 5 0.61 1.00 5
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.81 10 0.73 1.00 10
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.81 9 0.85 1.06 10
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 0.81 13 0.97 1.01 13
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.81 11 1.09 0.97 11
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 0.81 11 1.22 0.94 10
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.81 14 1.34 0.90 13
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 0.81 21 1.46 0.88 18
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.81 18 1.58 0.85 15
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 0.81 17 1.70 0.82 14
15 Non Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 13 1.87 0.79 10
16 Non Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 15 1.99 0.77 12
17 Non Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 13 2.12 0.75 10
18 Non Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 16 2.24 0.73 12
19 Non Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 21 2.37 0.71 15
20 Non Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 25 2.49 0.70 17
21 Non Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 22 2.61 0.68 15
22 Non Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 25 2.74 0.66 17
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 32 2.86 1.00 32
24 Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 36 2.99 1.00 36
25 Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 36 3.11 1.00 36
26 Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 38 3.24 1.00 38
27 Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 36 3.36 1.00 36
28 Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 40 3.49 1.00 40
29 Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 44 3.61 1.00 44
30 Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 46 3.74 1.00 46
31 Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 21 3.86 1.00 21
32 Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 14 3.98 1.00 14
33 Plastic 49.5 1.5 0.83 16 4.11 1.00 16
34 Plastic 51 1.5 0.83 16 4.23 1.00 16
35 Plastic 52.5 1.5 0.83 17 4.36 1.00 17
36 Plastic 54 1.5 0.83 16 4.48 1.00 16
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 0.83 15 4.61 1.00 15
38 Plastic 57 1.5 0.83 14 4.73 1.00 14
39 Plastic 58.5 1.5 0.83 28 4.86 1.00 28
40 Plastic 60 1.5 0.83 30 4.98 1.00 30
41 Plastic 61.5 1.5 0.83 39 5.10 1.00 39

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 7.47 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line
 Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 526 T
(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)
Qb Cb. Nc. Ap
Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line
Qb 286.277631

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1120.29 286.28

Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
(i) Working Capacity of Pile = 642 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 563 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 563

Recommended Pile Load 563 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 474 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ing Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for PIER-29

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-05

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
2 0 0 1 1 0.00 0.61 7.07 7.069
2 0 0 1 1 0.00 1.82 7.07 7.07
2 0 0 1 1 0.00 3.04 7.07 7.069
3 0 0 1 1 0.00 4.25 7.07 7.069
5 0 0 3 1 0.00 5.47 7.07 21.21
10 0 0 6 1 0.00 6.68 7.07 31.81
10 20 15 0 0 0.30 7.47 7.07 15.841
13 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
11 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
10 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
13 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
17 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
15 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
14 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
10 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
12 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
10 20 15 0 0 0.30 7.47 7.07 15.84
12 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.12
15 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
16 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
15 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
16 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
32 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
36 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
36 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
38 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
36 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
40 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.41
44 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.41
46 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.41
21 0 0 14 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 32.16
14 0 0 9 0.5 0.00 7.47 7.07 31.81
16 0 0 15 0.33 0.00 7.47 7.07 34.459
16 0 0 15 0.33 0.00 7.47 7.07 34.459
17 0 0 15 0.33 0.00 7.47 7.07 34.459
16 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
15 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
14 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
28 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
30 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
39 0 0 20 0.30 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412

Total Friction Σ 1120 T

6
9

7.47 t/m2
 Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
plastic 58.5 444
plastic 60 459
plastic 61.5 474

factor of 0.7
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Rive

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of Bor

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 48 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.81 2 0.12 1.00 2

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.81 4 0.24 1.00 4
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.81 3 0.36 1.00 3
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.81 3 0.49 1.00 3
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.81 4 0.61 1.00 4
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.81 6 0.73 1.00 6
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.81 16 0.85 1.06 17
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 0.81 17 0.97 1.01 17
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.81 17 1.09 0.97 17
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 0.81 19 1.22 0.94 18
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.81 17 1.34 0.90 15
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 0.81 12 1.46 0.88 11
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.81 18 1.58 0.85 15
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 0.81 17 1.70 0.82 14
15 Non Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 19 1.87 0.79 15
16 Non Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 25 1.99 0.77 19
17 Non Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 27 2.12 0.75 20
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 27 2.24 1.00 27
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 31 2.37 1.00 31
20 Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 35 2.49 1.00 35
21 Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 35 2.61 1.00 35
22 Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 34 2.74 1.00 34
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 24 2.86 1.00 24
24 Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 28 2.99 1.00 28
25 Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 28 3.11 1.00 28
26 Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 28 3.24 1.00 28
27 Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 30 3.36 1.00 30
28 Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 31 3.49 1.00 31
29 Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 39 3.61 1.00 39
30 Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 39 3.74 1.00 39
31 Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 22 3.86 1.00 22
32 Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 25 3.98 1.00 25
33 Plastic 49.5 1.5 0.83 17 4.11 1.00 17
34 Plastic 51 1.5 0.83 19 4.23 1.00 19
35 Plastic 52.5 1.5 0.83 20 4.36 1.00 20
36 Plastic 54 1.5 0.83 23 4.48 1.00 23
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 0.83 29 4.61 1.00 29
38 Plastic 57 1.5 0.83 34 4.73 1.00 34
39 Plastic 58.5 1.5 0.83 34 4.86 1.00 34
40 Plastic 60 1.5 0.83 44 4.98 1.00 44

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 7.47 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line
 Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 637 T
(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)
Qb Cb. Nc. Ap
Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line
Qb 286.277631

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing
Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1118.13 286.28
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
(i) Working Capacity of Pile = 641 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 562 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 562

Recommended Pile Load 562 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 473 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ing Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for PIER-30

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-05

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
2 0 0 1 1 0.00 0.61 7.07 7.069
4 0 0 2 1 0.00 1.82 7.07 14.14
3 0 0 1 1 0.00 3.04 7.07 7.069
3 0 0 1 1 0.00 4.25 7.07 7.069
4 0 0 2 1 0.00 5.47 7.07 14.14
6 0 0 3 1 0.00 6.68 7.07 21.21
16 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
16 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
16 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
16 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
15 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
11 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
15 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
14 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
15 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
17 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
18 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.12
27 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 38.17
31 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
35 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
35 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
34 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
24 0 0 16 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 33.929
28 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 38.170
28 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 38.170
28 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 38.170
30 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.412
31 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.41
39 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.41
39 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 42.41
22 0 0 14 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 32.16
25 0 0 16 0.3 0.00 7.47 7.07 33.93
17 0 0 15 0.33 0.40 7.47 7.07 55.580
19 0 0 15 0.33 0.40 7.47 7.07 55.580
20 0 0 15 0.33 0.40 7.47 7.07 55.580
23 0 0 20 0.30 0.40 7.47 7.07 63.532
29 0 0 20 0.30 0.40 7.47 7.07 63.532
34 0 0 20 0.30 0.40 7.47 7.07 63.532
34 0 0 20 0.30 0.40 7.47 7.07 63.532
44 0 0 20 0.30 0.40 7.47 7.07 63.532

Total Friction Σ 1118 T

6
9

7.47 t/m2
 Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
plastic 55.5 473
plastic 57 495
plastic 58.5 518

factor of 0.7
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Rive

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of Bor

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 48 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.81 3 0.12 1.00 3

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.81 2 0.24 1.00 2
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.81 1 0.36 1.00 1
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.81 4 0.49 1.00 4
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.81 3 0.61 1.00 3
6 Non Plastic 9 1.5 0.81 11 0.73 1.11 12
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.81 12 0.85 1.06 13
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 0.81 19 0.97 1.01 19
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.81 18 1.09 0.97 17
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 0.81 23 1.22 0.94 22
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.81 19 1.34 0.90 17
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 0.81 15 1.46 0.88 13
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.81 22 1.58 0.85 19
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 0.81 25 1.70 0.82 21
15 Non Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 14 1.87 0.79 11
16 Non Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 14 1.99 0.77 11
17 Non Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 14 2.12 0.75 11
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 22 2.24 1.00 22
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 16 2.37 1.00 16
20 Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 18 2.49 1.00 18
21 Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 18 2.61 1.00 18
22 Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 12 2.74 1.00 12
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 13 2.86 1.00 13
24 Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 26 2.99 1.00 26
25 Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 16 3.11 1.00 16
26 Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 14 3.24 1.00 14
27 Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 23 3.36 1.00 23
28 Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 34 3.49 1.00 34
29 Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 24 3.61 1.00 24
30 Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 28 3.74 1.00 28
31 Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 30 3.86 1.00 30
32 Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 28 3.98 1.00 28

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 7.47 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 669 T

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing
Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1159.83 669.09
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
(i) Working Capacity of Pile = 771 T
 (ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 732 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 732

Recommended Pile Load 732 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.67

Q allowable group 580 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ing Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for PIER-31

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-05

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
3 0 0 1 1 0.30 0.61 7.07 8.357
2 0 0 1 1 0.30 1.82 7.07 10.93
1 0 0 1 1 0.30 3.04 7.07 13.510
4 0 0 2 1 0.30 4.25 7.07 23.155
3 0 0 1 1 0.30 5.47 7.07 18.66
12 20 15 0 0 0.40 6.68 7.07 18.89
13 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
17 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
16 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
18 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
16 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
13 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
17 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
18 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
11 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
11 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.121
11 20 15 0 0 0.40 7.47 7.07 21.12
22 0 0 14 0.3 0.40 7.47 7.07 53.28
16 0 0 10 0.5 0.40 7.47 7.07 52.930
18 0 0 11 0.4 0.40 7.47 7.07 52.223
18 0 0 11 0.4 0.40 7.47 7.07 52.223
12 0 0 7 0.6 0.40 7.47 7.07 51.799
13 0 0 8 0.6 0.40 7.47 7.07 52.223
26 0 0 17 0.3 0.40 7.47 7.07 57.171
16 0 0 10 0.5 0.40 7.47 7.07 52.930
14 0 0 9 0.5 0.40 7.47 7.07 52.930
23 0 0 15 0.3 0.40 7.47 7.07 55.580
34 0 0 20 0.3 0.40 7.47 7.07 63.53
24 0 0 16 0.3 0.40 7.47 7.07 55.05
28 0 0 18 0.3 0.40 7.47 7.07 59.29
30 0 0 20 0.3 0.40 7.47 7.07 63.53
28 0 0 18 0.3 0.40 7.47 7.07 59.29

Total Friction Σ 1160 T

6
9

7.47 t/m2
factor of 0.67
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge o

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying C

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 45 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length
Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Z/2 Field SPT
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.75 0.8 1 0.12 1.00

2 Plastic 3 1.5 2.25 0.8 2 0.24 1.00
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 3.75 0.8 2 0.36 1.00
4 Plastic 6 1.5 5.25 0.8 1 0.48 1.00
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 6.75 0.8 1 0.60 1.00
6 Plastic 9 1.5 8.25 0.8 2 0.72 1.00
7 Plastic 10.5 1.5 9.75 0.8 5 0.84 1.00
8 Plastic 12 1.5 11.25 0.8 6 0.96 1.00
9 Plastic 13.5 1.5 12.75 0.8 7 1.08 1.00
10 Plastic 15 1.5 14.25 0.8 9 1.20 1.00
11 Plastic 16.5 1.5 15.75 0.8 12 1.32 1.00
12 Plastic 18 1.5 17.25 0.8 14 1.44 1.00
13 Plastic 19.5 1.5 18.75 0.8 11 1.56 1.00
14 Plastic 21 1.5 20.25 0.8 10 1.68 1.00
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 21.75 0.8 9 1.80 1.00
16 Plastic 24 1.5 23.25 0.8 10 1.92 1.00
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 24.75 0.8 16 2.04 1.00
18 Plastic 27 1.5 26.25 0.8 18 2.16 1.00
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 27.75 0.8 16 2.28 1.00
20 Plastic 30 1.5 29.25 0.8 21 2.40 1.00
21 Plastic 31.5 1.5 30.75 0.8 29 2.52 1.00
22 Plastic 33 1.5 32.25 0.8 37 2.64 1.00
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 33.75 0.8 32 2.76 1.00
24 Plastic 36 1.5 35.25 0.8 31 2.88 1.00
25 Plastic 37.5 1.5 36.75 0.8 27 3.00 1.00
26 Plastic 39 1.5 38.25 0.8 36 3.12 1.00
27 Plastic 40.5 1.5 39.75 0.8 33 3.24 1.00
28 Nonplastic 42 1.5 41.25 0.8 29 3.36 0.60
29 Nonplastic 43.5 1.5 42.75 0.8 20 3.48 0.58
30 Nonplastic 45 1.5 44.25 0.8 21 3.60 0.57
34 Nonplastic 46.5 1.5 45.75 0.83 13 3.86 0.55
35 Nonplastic 48 1.5 47.25 0.83 11 3.98 0.54
36 Plastic 49.5 1.5 48.75 0.83 14 4.11 1.00
37 Plastic 51 1.5 50.25 0.83 16 4.23 1.00
38 Plastic 52.5 1.5 51.75 0.83 17 4.36 1.00
39 Plastic 54 1.5 53.25 0.83 17 4.48 1.00
40 Plastic 55.5 1.5 54.75 0.83 16 4.61 1.00
41 Plastic 57 2.5 56.25 0.83 36 4.73 1.00

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.96 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 510 T T

(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)

 Qb Cb. Nc. Ap
Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line
Qb 127.2345024704 638

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 944.50 637.66

Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5

Working Capacity of Pile = 654 T

(i)

Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 633 T

(ii)

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 633

Recommended Pile Load 633 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 499 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
uction of PAIRA Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

c Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for A1

ut steel liner

D Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/A1/PF-13

Final corrected
Corrected SPT Eff. overburden
value after δ Cohesion C α
( N' ) Value (For Ø K tanδ pr. @ the center Surf. Area (m2)
Dilatancy (t/m2)
Overburden) of ith layer
Correction (N'')

Pdi Asi
1 1 0 0 1 1 0.00 0.60 7.07
2 2 0 0 1 1 0.00 1.80 7.07
2 2 0 0 1 1 0.00 3.00 7.07
1 1 0 0 1 1 0.00 4.20 7.07
1 1 0 0 1 1 0.00 5.40 7.07
2 2 0 0 1 1 0.00 6.60 7.07
5 5 0 0 3 1 0.00 7.80 7.07
6 6 0 0 3 1 0.00 9.00 7.07
7 7 0 0 4 1 0.00 9.96 7.07
9 9 0 0 5 1 0.00 9.96 7.07
12 12 0 0 7 1 0.00 9.96 7.07
14 14 0 0 9 1 0.00 9.96 7.07
11 11 0 0 7 1 0.00 9.96 7.07
10 10 0 0 6 1 0.00 9.96 7.07
9 9 0 0 5 1 0.00 9.96 7.07
10 10 0 0 6 1 0.00 9.96 7.07
16 16 0 0 8 1 0.00 9.96 7.07
18 18 0 0 9 0.5 0.00 9.96 7.07
16 16 0 0 8 0.6 0.00 9.96 7.07
21 21 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 9.96 7.07
29 29 0 0 14 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07
37 37 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07
32 32 0 0 16 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07
31 31 0 0 15 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07
27 27 0 0 14 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07
36 36 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07
33 33 0 0 16 0.3 0.00 9.96 7.07
17 16 30 23 0 0.0 0.50 9.96 7.07
12 12 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
12 12 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
7 7 30 23 0 0.00 0.30 9.96 7.07
6 6 30 23 0 0.00 0.30 9.96 7.07
14 14 0 0 7 0.62 0.00 9.96 7.07
16 16 0 0 8 0.55 0.00 9.96 7.07
17 17 0 0 8 0.55 0.00 9.96 7.07
17 17 0 0 8 0.55 0.00 9.96 7.07
16 16 0 0 8 0.55 0.00 9.96 7.07
36 36 1 1 18 0.30 0.00 9.96 11.78

Total Friction Σ

8
12

9.96 t/m2
Guide line
 Group Effect

Pile Length as per Vertical Capacity

Soil Types
PMG Div. (m) (T)

plastic sil 40 438

Non plastic sil 45 396

plastic sil 50 452

plastic sil
55 499.00

d by a factor of 0.7
 Friction (Tons)

(αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
7.069
7.069
7.069
7.069
7.069
7.069
21.206
21.206
28.274
30.041
30.678
31.809
30.678
31.809
30.041
31.809
31.102
31.809
31.102
31.102
32.162
38.170
33.929
34.459
32.162
38.170
33.929
35.202
28.161
28.161
21.121
21.121
30.678
31.102
31.102
31.102
31.102
63.617

944 T
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the R

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 48 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/A2

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.8 3 0.12 1.00 3

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.8 1 0.24 1.00 1
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.8 2 0.36 1.00 2
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.8 5 0.48 1.00 5
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.8 7 0.60 1.00 7
6 Non Plastic 9 1.5 0.8 9 0.72 1.11 10
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.8 10 0.84 1.06 11
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 0.8 21 0.96 1.02 21
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.8 14 1.08 0.98 14
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 0.8 18 1.20 0.94 17
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.8 12 1.32 0.91 11
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 0.8 16 1.44 0.88 14
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.8 18 1.56 0.85 15
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 0.8 24 1.68 0.83 20
15 Non Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.8 25 1.80 0.81 20
16 Non Plastic 24 1.5 0.8 26 1.92 0.78 20
17 Non Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.8 18 2.04 0.76 14
18 Non Plastic 27 1.5 0.8 13 2.16 0.74 10
19 Non Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.8 16 2.28 0.73 12
20 Non Plastic 30 1.5 0.8 25 2.40 0.71 18
21 Non Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.8 20 2.52 0.69 14
22 Non Plastic 33 1.5 0.8 36 2.64 0.68 24
23 Non Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.8 37 2.76 0.66 25
24 Non Plastic 36 1.5 0.8 42 2.88 0.65 27
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.8 39 3.00 0.63 25
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 0.8 43 3.12 0.62 27
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.8 46 3.24 0.61 28
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 0.8 44 3.36 0.60 26
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.8 21 3.48 0.58 12
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 0.8 16 3.60 0.57 9
31 Non Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.8 17 3.72 0.56 10
32 Non Plastic 48 1.5 0.8 15 3.84 0.55 8
33 Non Plastic 49.5 1.5 0.8 18 3.96 0.54 10
34 Non Plastic 51 1.5 0.8 22 4.08 0.53 12
35 plastic 52.5 1.5 0.8 20 4.20 1.00 20
36 plastic 54 1.5 0.8 36 4.32 1.00 36
37 plastic 55.5 1.5 0.8 24 4.44 1.00 24
38 plastic 57 1.5 0.8 22 4.56 1.00 22
39 plastic 58.5 1.5 0.8 17 4.68 1.00 17
40 plastic 60 1.5 0.8 17 4.80 1.00 17
41 plastic 61.5 1.5 0.8 4.92 1.00 0
42 plastic 63 1.5 0.8 5.04 1.00 0
43 plastic 64.5 1.5 0.8 5.16 1.00 0
44 plastic 66 1.5 0.8 5.28 1.00 0
31 plastic 67.5 1.5 0.8 17 5.40 1.00 17
32 plastic 69 1.5 0.8 15 5.52 1.00 15

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
 Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.96 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

510
Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap T

95.4258769
(3) Capacity of Pile :
Friction End Bearing
Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 856.30 605.85
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
(i) Working Capacity of Pile = 601 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 585 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 585

Recommended Pile Load 585 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 473 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
RA Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

d Carrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for A2

D/PAIRA BRIDGE/A2/PF-15

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
3 0 0 1 1 0.00 0.60 7.07 7.069
1 0 0 1 1 0.00 1.80 7.07 7.07
2 0 0 1 1 0.00 3.00 7.07 7.069
5 0 0 3 1 0.00 4.20 7.07 21.206
7 0 0 4 1 0.00 5.40 7.07 28.27
10 30 23 0 0 0.40 6.60 7.07 18.66
11 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.80 7.07 22.054
18 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.00 7.07 25.447
14 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
16 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
11 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
14 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
15 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
17 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
18 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
18 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
14 30 23 0 0 0.00 9.96 7.07 0.00
10 30 23 0 0.0 0.00 9.96 7.07 0.00
12 30 23 0 0.0 0.00 9.96 7.07 0.000
16 30 23 0 0.0 0.00 9.96 7.07 0.000
14 30 23 0 0.0 0.00 9.96 7.07 0.000
20 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
20 34 26 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
21 34 26 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
20 34 26 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
21 34 26 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
21 34 26 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.161
21 34 26 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.16
12 34 26 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.16
9 34 26 0 0.0 0.30 9.96 7.07 21.12
10 34 26 0 0.0 0.30 9.96 7.07 21.12
8 34 26 0 0.0 0.30 9.96 7.07 21.12
10 34 26 0 0.0 0.30 9.96 7.07 21.12
12 34 26 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.16
20 0 0 5 0.9 0.40 9.96 7.07 58.20
36 0 0 8 0.6 0.40 9.96 7.07 59.26
24 0 0 6 0.8 0.40 9.96 7.07 59.97
22 0 0 6 0.8 0.40 9.96 7.07 59.97
17 0 0 4 1.0 0.40 9.96 7.07 56.44
17 0 0 4 1.0 0.40 9.96 7.07 56.44
0 0 0 0 0.0 0.30 9.96 7.07 21.12
0 0 0 0 0.0 0.30 9.96 7.07 21.12
0 0 0 0 0.0 0.30 9.96 7.07 21.12
0 0 0 0 0.0 0.30 9.96 7.07 21.12
17 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.16
15 29 22 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07 28.16
Total Friction Σ 856 T

8
 12

9.96 t/m2
Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
Non plasticPlastic soil 40 324
Non plasticPlastic soil 45 351
Non plasticPlastic soil 50 374
plasticPlastic soil 55.00 473.00

depth
60 522
40 327
45 354
50 376
55 475

factor of 0.7
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 55 m As per GAD Drawing no

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Tip γ 0.8 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length
Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil soil description incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.8 5 0.12 1.00

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.8 4 0.24 1.00
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.8 3 0.36 1.00
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.8 4 0.48 1.00
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.8 6 0.60 1.00
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.8 5 0.72 1.00
7 Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.8 7 0.84 1.00
8 Plastic 12 1.5 0.8 4 0.96 1.00
9 Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.8 5 1.08 1.00
10 Plastic silty with some clay 15 1.5 0.8 10 1.20 1.00
11 Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.8 10 1.32 1.00
12 Plastic 18 1.5 0.8 13 1.44 1.00
13 Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.8 15 1.56 1.00
14 Plastic 21 1.5 0.8 12 1.68 1.00
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.8 16 1.80 1.00
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.8 19 1.92 1.00
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.8 17 2.04 1.00
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.8 21 2.16 1.00
19 non plastic 28.5 1.5 0.8 18 2.28 0.73
20 non plastic 30 1.5 0.8 19 2.40 0.71
21 non plastic 31.5 1.5 0.8 18 2.52 0.69
22 non plastic 33 1.5 0.8 14 2.64 0.68
23 non plastic 34.5 1.5 0.8 12 2.76 0.66
24 non plastic 36 1.5 0.8 18 2.88 0.65
25 non plastic 37.5 1.5 0.8 19 3.00 0.63
26 non plastic silty sand 39 1.5 0.8 23 3.12 0.62
27 non plastic 40.5 1.5 0.8 21 3.24 0.61
28 non plastic 42 1.5 0.8 24 3.36 0.60
29 non plastic 43.5 1.5 0.8 22 3.48 0.58
30 non plastic 45 1.5 0.8 48 3.60 0.57
31 non plastic 46.5 1.5 0.8 44 3.72 0.56
32 non plastic 48 1.5 0.8 52 3.84 0.55
33 non plastic 49.5 1.5 0.8 47 3.96 0.54
34 Plastic 51 1.5 0.8 21 4.08 1.00
35 Plastic 52.5 1.5 0.8 19 4.20 1.00
clayey silt with trace
36 Plastic 54 1.5 0.8 23 4.32 1.00
sand
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 0.8 21 4.44 1.00
38 Plastic 57 1.5 0.8 25 4.56 1.00

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.80 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.60 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 492 T

(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)

Qb Cb. Nc. Ap

Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line

Qb 11.133019 503

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing
Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1047.85 503.11
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
(i) Working Capacity of Pile = 668 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 620 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 620

Recommended Pile Load 620 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 510 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
 PAIRA Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

Load Carrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P6

AD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-01

Final corrected Eff.

Corrected SPT
value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
( N' ) Value (For Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Overburden)
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi Asi
5 5 0 0 3 1 0.00 0.60 7.07
4 4 0 0 2 1 0.00 1.80 7.07
3 3 0 0 1 1 0.00 3.00 7.07
4 4 0 0 2 1 0.00 4.20 7.07
6 6 0 0 3 1 0.00 5.40 7.07
5 5 0 0 3 1 0.00 6.60 7.07
7 7 0 0 4 1 0.00 7.80 7.07
4 4 0 0 2 1 0.00 9.00 7.07
5 5 0 0 3 1 0.00 9.60 7.07
10 10 0 0 5 1 0.00 9.60 7.07
10 10 0 0 5 1 0.00 9.60 7.07
13 13 0 0 6 0.8 0.00 9.60 7.07
15 15 0 0 8 0.6 0.00 9.60 7.07
12 12 0 0 7 0.6 0.00 9.60 7.07
16 16 0 0 8 0.6 0.00 9.60 7.07
19 19 0 0 10 0.5 0.00 9.60 7.07
17 17 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 9.60 7.07
21 21 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 9.60 7.07
13 13 22 17 0.5 1.0 0.40 9.60 7.07
13 13 22 17 0.5 1.0 0.40 9.60 7.07
12 12 22 17 0.5 1.0 0.40 9.60 7.07
9 9 22 17 0.5 1.0 0.30 9.60 7.07
8 8 22 17 0.5 1.0 0.30 9.60 7.07
12 12 22 17 0.5 1.0 0.40 9.60 7.07
12 12 22 17 0.5 1.0 0.40 9.60 7.07
14 14 27 20 1.0 1.000 0.40 9.60 7.07
13 13 27 20 1.0 1.000 0.40 9.60 7.07
14 14 27 20 1.0 1.000 0.40 9.60 7.07
13 13 27 20 1.0 1.000 0.40 9.60 7.07
28 21 27 20 1.0 1.000 0.40 9.60 7.07
25 20 27 20 1.0 1.000 0.40 9.60 7.07
29 22 27 20 1.0 1.000 0.40 9.60 7.07
25 20 27 20 1.0 1.000 0.40 9.60 7.07
21 21 9 7 11 0.400 0.40 9.60 7.07
19 19 9 7 10 0.450 0.40 9.60 7.07
23 23 9 7 12 0.370 0.40 9.60 7.07
21 21 9 7 12 0.370 0.40 9.60 7.07
25 25 9 7 13 0.350 0.40 9.60 7.07
Total Friction Σ

8
12

9.6 t/m2
Guide line
 Group Effect
Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
Non plasticPlastic soil 40 393
Non plasticPlastic soil 45 429
Non plasticPlastic soil 50 464
plastic soil 55 510.00

or of 0.7
 Friction (Tons)

(αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
21.206
14.14
7.069
14.137
21.21
21.21
28.274
14.137
21.206
30.041
30.041
31.809
31.102
30.678
31.102
31.809
31.10
31.10
30.678
30.678
30.678
23.892
23.892
30.678
30.678
34.212
34.212
34.21
34.21
34.21
34.21
34.21
34.21
58.25
58.95
58.53
58.53
59.31
711 T
336.89
1048 T
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Rive

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of B

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 45 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 1.8 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.8 6 0.12 1.00 6

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.8 8 0.24 1.00 8
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.8 8 0.36 1.00 8
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.8 8 0.48 1.00 8
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.8 6 0.60 1.00 6
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.8 7 0.72 1.00 7
7 Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.8 5 0.84 1.00 5
8 Plastic 12 1.5 0.8 9 0.96 1.00 9
9 Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.8 7 1.08 1.00 7
10 Plastic 15 1.5 0.8 22 1.20 1.00 22
11 Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.8 18 1.32 1.00 18
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 0.8 1 1.44 0.88 1
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.8 7 1.56 0.85 6
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 0.8 25 1.68 0.83 21
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.8 22 1.80 1.00 22
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.8 27 1.92 1.00 27
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.8 23 2.04 1.00 23
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.8 24 2.16 1.00 24
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.8 21 2.28 1.00 21
20 Plastic 30 1.5 0.8 16 2.40 1.00 16
21 Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.8 36 2.52 1.00 36
22 Plastic 33 1.5 0.8 37 2.64 1.00 37
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.8 28 2.76 1.00 28
24 Plastic 36 1.5 0.8 30 2.88 1.00 30
25 Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.8 49 3.00 1.00 49
26 Plastic 39 1.5 0.8 58 3.12 1.00 58
27 Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.8 57 3.24 1.00 57
28 Plastic 42 1.5 0.8 42 3.36 1.00 42
29 Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.8 49 3.48 1.00 49
30 Plastic 45 1.5 0.8 89 3.60 1.00 89

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 1.80 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 16.20 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 1053 T

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing
 Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 866.82 1052.87
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
(i) Working Capacity of Pile = 734 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 768 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 734

Recommended Pile Load 734 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.67

Q allowable group 591 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

rrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P7

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-01

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
6 0 0 3 1 0.00 0.60 7.07 21.206
8 0 0 4 1 0.00 1.80 7.07 28.27
8 0 0 4 1 0.00 3.00 7.07 28.274
8 0 0 4 1 0.00 4.20 7.07 28.274
6 0 0 3 1 0.00 5.40 7.07 21.21
7 0 0 4 1 0.00 6.60 7.07 28.27
5 0 0 3 1 0.00 7.80 7.07 21.206
9 0 0 5 1 0.00 9.00 7.07 30.041
7 0 0 4 1 0.00 10.20 7.07 28.274
22 0 0 14 0 0.00 11.40 7.07 32.162
18 0 0 11 0 0.00 12.60 7.07 31.102
1 28 21 0 0 0.40 13.80 7.07 39.019
6 28 21 0 0 0.40 15.00 7.07 42.412
18 29 22 0 0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
22 0 0 14 0 0.00 16.20 7.07 32.162
27 0 0 18 0 0.00 16.20 7.07 38.170
23 0 0 18 0 0.00 16.20 7.07 38.17
24 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 16.20 7.07 38.17
21 0 0 14 0.3 0.00 16.20 7.07 32.162
16 0 0 10 0.5 0.00 16.20 7.07 31.809
36 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 16.20 7.07 42.412
37 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 16.20 7.07 42.412
28 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 16.20 7.07 38.170
30 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 16.20 7.07 42.412
49 26 20 20 0.3 0.40 16.20 7.07 88.216
58 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 16.20 7.07 42.412
57 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 16.20 7.07 42.412
42 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 16.20 7.07 42.41
49 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 16.20 7.07 42.41
89 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 16.20 7.07 42.41
Total Friction Σ 867 T

6
9

16.2 t/m2
factor of 0.67
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Rive

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of B

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 45 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 1.8 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.8 3 0.12 1.00 3

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.8 5 0.24 1.00 5
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.8 4 0.36 1.00 4
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.8 8 0.48 1.00 8
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.8 7 0.60 1.00 7
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.8 9 0.72 1.00 9
7 Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.8 8 0.84 1.00 8
8 Plastic 12 1.5 0.8 3 0.96 1.00 3
9 Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.8 2 1.08 1.00 2
10 Plastic 15 1.5 0.8 2 1.20 1.00 2
11 Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.8 2 1.32 1.00 2
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 0.8 3 1.44 0.88 3
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.8 3 1.56 0.85 3
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 0.8 3 1.68 0.83 2
15 Non Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.8 8 1.80 0.81 6
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.8 8 1.92 1.00 8
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.8 7 2.04 1.00 7
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.8 10 2.16 1.00 10
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.8 8 2.28 1.00 8
20 Plastic 30 1.5 0.8 18 2.40 1.00 18
21 Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.8 17 2.52 1.00 17
22 Plastic 33 1.5 0.8 19 2.64 1.00 19
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.8 23 2.76 1.00 23
24 Plastic 36 1.5 0.8 30 2.88 1.00 30
25 Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.8 25 3.00 1.00 25
26 Plastic 39 1.5 0.8 25 3.12 1.00 25
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.8 23 3.24 0.61 14
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 0.8 19 3.36 0.60 11
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.8 28 3.48 0.58 16
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 0.8 48 3.60 0.57 28

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 1.80 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 16.20 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 830 T

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing
Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1462.88 830.21
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
(i) Working Capacity of Pile = 969 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 917 T

 Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 917

Recommended Pile Load 917 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.67

Q allowable group 727 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

rrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P8

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-01

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
3 0 0 1 1 0.30 0.60 7.07 8.341
5 0 0 3 1 0.30 1.80 7.07 25.02
4 0 0 2 1 0.30 3.00 7.07 20.499
8 0 0 4 1 0.30 4.20 7.07 37.181
7 0 0 4 1 0.30 5.40 7.07 39.73
9 0 0 5 1 0.30 6.60 7.07 44.04
8 0 0 4 1 0.30 7.80 7.07 44.815
3 0 0 1 1 0.30 9.00 7.07 26.154
2 0 0 0 0 0.30 10.20 7.07 21.630
2 0 0 0 0 0.30 11.40 7.07 24.175
2 0 0 0 0 0.30 12.60 7.07 26.719
3 28 21 0 0 0.30 13.80 7.07 29.264
3 28 21 0 0 0.30 15.00 7.07 31.809
2 28 21 0 0 0.30 16.20 7.07 34.353
6 31 23 0 0 0.30 16.20 7.07 34.353
8 0 0 4 1 0.30 16.20 7.07 62.628
7 0 0 4 1 0.30 16.20 7.07 62.63
10 0 0 6 0.8 0.40 16.20 7.07 77.61
8 0 0 4 1.0 0.30 16.20 7.07 62.628
18 0 0 11 0.4 0.40 16.20 7.07 76.906
17 0 0 11 0.4 0.40 16.20 7.07 76.906
19 26 20 5 0.9 0.40 16.20 7.07 75.846
23 0 0 15 0.3 0.40 16.20 7.07 80.264
30 0 0 20 0.3 0.40 16.20 7.07 88.216
25 0 0 18 0.3 0.40 16.20 7.07 83.975
25 0 0 18 0.3 0.40 16.20 7.07 83.975
14 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
11 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.80
16 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.80
21 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.80
Total Friction Σ 1463 T

6
9

16.2 t/m2
factor of 0.67
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Rive

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of B

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 45 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 1.8 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.8 2 0.12 1.00 2

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.8 2 0.24 1.00 2
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.8 4 0.36 1.00 4
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.8 5 0.48 1.00 5
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.8 9 0.60 1.00 9
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.8 2 0.72 1.00 2
7 Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.8 2 0.84 1.00 2
8 Plastic 12 1.5 0.8 3 0.96 1.00 3
9 Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.8 2 1.08 1.00 2
10 Plastic 15 1.5 0.8 3 1.20 1.00 3
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.8 13 1.32 0.91 12
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 0.8 15 1.44 0.88 13
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.8 15 1.56 0.85 13
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 0.8 21 1.68 0.83 17
15 Non Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.8 4 1.80 0.81 3
16 Non Plastic 24 1.5 0.8 5 1.92 0.78 4
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.8 5 2.04 1.00 5
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.8 7 2.16 1.00 7
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.8 17 2.28 1.00 17
20 Plastic 30 1.5 0.8 19 2.40 1.00 19
21 Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.8 12 2.52 1.00 12
22 Plastic 33 1.5 0.8 14 2.64 1.00 14
23 Non Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.8 26 2.76 0.66 17
24 Non Plastic 36 1.5 0.8 33 2.88 0.65 21
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.8 16 3.00 0.63 10
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 0.8 22 3.12 0.62 14
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.8 22 3.24 0.61 13
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 0.8 21 3.36 0.60 13
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.8 17 3.48 0.58 10
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 0.8 18 3.60 0.57 10

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 1.80 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 16.20 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 830 T

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing
Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1218.98 830.21
Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
(i) Working Capacity of Pile = 847 T

(ii) Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 820 T

 Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 820

Recommended Pile Load 820 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.67

Q allowable group 646 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

rrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P9

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-03

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
2 0 0 0 0 0.30 0.60 7.07 1.272
2 0 0 0 0 0.30 1.80 7.07 3.82
4 0 0 2 1 0.30 3.00 7.07 20.499
5 0 0 3 1 0.30 4.20 7.07 30.112
9 0 0 5 1 0.30 5.40 7.07 41.49
2 0 0 0 0 0.30 6.60 7.07 14.00
2 0 0 0 0 0.30 7.80 7.07 16.540
3 0 0 1 1 0.30 9.00 7.07 26.154
2 0 0 0 0 0.30 10.20 7.07 21.630
3 0 0 1 1 0.30 11.40 7.07 31.243
12 30 23 0 0 0.40 12.60 7.07 35.626
13 28 21 0 0 0.40 13.80 7.07 39.019
13 30 23 0 0 0.40 15.00 7.07 42.412
16 31 23 0 0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
3 28 21 0 0 0.30 16.20 7.07 34.353
4 28 21 0 0 0.30 16.20 7.07 34.353
5 0 0 3 1 0.30 16.20 7.07 55.56
7 0 0 4 1.0 0.30 16.20 7.07 62.63
17 0 0 11 0.4 0.40 16.20 7.07 76.906
19 0 0 12 0.4 0.40 16.20 7.07 77.189
12 0 0 7 0.6 0.40 16.20 7.07 76.482
14 22 17 8 0.6 0.40 16.20 7.07 76.906
16 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
18 28 21 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
10 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
14 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
13 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
13 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.80
10 30 23 0 0.0 0.30 16.20 7.07 34.35
10 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.80
Total Friction Σ 1219 T

6
9

16.2 t/m2
factor of 0.67
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Rive

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of B

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 48 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 1.8 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.8 2 0.12 1.00 2

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.8 4 0.24 1.00 4
3 Non Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.8 7 0.36 1.34 9
4 Non Plastic 6 1.5 0.8 8 0.48 1.25 10
5 Non Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.8 3 0.60 1.17 4
6 Non Plastic 9 1.5 0.8 4 0.72 1.11 4
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.8 5 0.84 1.06 5
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 0.8 6 0.96 1.02 6
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.8 4 1.08 0.98 4
10 Plastic 15 1.5 0.8 4 1.20 1.00 4
11 Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.8 5 1.32 1.00 5
12 Plastic 18 1.5 0.8 5 1.44 1.00 5
13 Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.8 13 1.56 1.00 13
14 Plastic 21 1.5 0.8 18 1.68 1.00 18
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.8 17 1.80 1.00 17
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.8 8 1.92 1.00 8
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.8 15 2.04 1.00 15
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.8 17 2.16 1.00 17
19 Non Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.8 21 2.28 0.73 15
20 Non Plastic 30 1.5 0.8 20 2.40 0.71 14
21 Non Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.8 23 2.52 0.69 16
22 Non Plastic 33 1.5 0.8 28 2.64 0.68 19
23 Non Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.8 18 2.76 0.66 12
24 Non Plastic 36 1.5 0.8 20 2.88 0.65 13
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.8 43 3.00 0.63 27
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 0.8 50 3.12 0.62 31
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.8 65 3.24 0.61 40
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 0.8 67 3.36 0.60 40
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.8 34 3.48 0.58 20
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 0.8 45 3.60 0.57 26
31 Non Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.8 56 3.72 0.56 31
32 Non Plastic 48 1.5 0.8 55 3.84 0.55 30

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 1.80 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 16.20 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 862 T

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1286.91 862.01
(i) Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
Working Capacity of Pile = 890 T
(ii)
 Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 860 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 860

Recommended Pile Load 860 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.67

Q allowable group 677 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

rying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P10

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-03

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
2 0 0 0 0 0.30 0.60 7.07 1.272
4 0 0 2 1 0.30 1.80 7.07 17.95
9 29 22 0 0 0.30 3.00 7.07 6.362
10 30 23 0 0 0.30 4.20 7.07 8.906
4 28 21 1 1 0.30 5.40 7.07 18.52
4 24 18 10 0 0.30 6.60 7.07 45.80
5 29 22 0 0 0.30 7.80 7.07 16.540
6 29 22 0 0 0.30 9.00 7.07 19.085
4 28 21 0 0 0.30 10.20 7.07 21.630
4 0 0 2 1 0.30 11.40 7.07 38.312
5 0 0 3 1 0.30 12.60 7.07 47.925
5 0 0 3 1 0.30 13.80 7.07 50.470
13 0 0 8 1 0.40 15.00 7.07 73.513
18 0 0 11 0 0.40 16.20 7.07 76.906
17 0 0 11 0 0.40 16.20 7.07 76.906
8 0 0 4 1 0.30 16.20 7.07 62.628
15 0 0 10 0 0.40 16.20 7.07 77.61
17 0 0 11 0.4 0.40 16.20 7.07 76.91
15 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
14 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
15 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
17 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
12 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
13 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
21 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
23 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
27 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.804
27 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.80
17 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.80
20 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 16.20 7.07 45.80
23 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 0.00 7.07 0.00
23 27 20 0 0.0 0.40 0.00 7.07 0.00
Total Friction Σ 1287 T

6
9

16.2 t/m2
factor of 0.67
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Rive

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of B

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 48 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 1.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Non Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.83 3 0.12 1.40 4

2 Non Plastic 3 1.5 0.83 5 0.25 1.40 7
3 Non Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.83 3 0.37 1.33 4
4 Non Plastic 6 1.5 0.83 3 0.50 1.23 4
5 Non Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.83 5 0.62 1.16 6
6 Non Plastic 9 1.5 0.83 4 0.75 1.10 4
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.83 4 0.87 1.05 4
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 0.83 5 1.00 1.00 5
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.83 10 1.12 0.96 10
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 0.83 18 1.25 0.93 17
11 Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.83 13 1.37 1.00 13
12 Plastic 18 1.5 0.83 14 1.49 1.00 14
13 Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.83 11 1.62 1.00 11
14 Plastic 21 1.5 0.83 12 1.74 1.00 12
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 5 1.87 1.00 5
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 7 1.99 1.00 7
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 14 2.12 1.00 14
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 24 2.24 1.00 24
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 11 2.37 1.00 11
20 Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 9 2.49 1.00 9
21 Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 11 2.61 1.00 11
22 Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 12 2.74 1.00 12
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 22 2.86 1.00 22
24 Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 29 2.99 1.00 29
25 Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 36 3.11 1.00 36
26 Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 38 3.24 1.00 38
27 Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 32 3.36 1.00 32
28 Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 43 3.49 1.00 43
29 Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 28 3.61 1.00 28
30 Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 25 3.74 1.00 25
31 Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 26 3.86 1.00 26
32 Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 26 3.98 1.00 26

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 1.83 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 16.47 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 844 T

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1705.25 844.04
(i) Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
Working Capacity of Pile = 1094 T
(ii)
 Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 1020 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 1020

Recommended Pile Load 1020 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.67

Q allowable group 812 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
ridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

rying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P11

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-03

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
4 28 21 0 0 0.30 0.62 7.07 1.320
7 29 22 0 0 0.30 1.87 7.07 3.96
4 28 21 0 0 0.30 3.11 7.07 6.600
4 28 21 0 0 0.30 4.36 7.07 9.240
6 29 22 0 0 0.30 5.60 7.07 11.88
4 28 21 0 0 0.30 6.85 7.07 14.52
4 28 21 0 0 0.30 8.09 7.07 17.161
5 29 22 0 0 0.30 9.34 7.07 19.801
10 30 23 0 0 0.30 10.58 7.07 22.441
16 31 23 0 0 0.40 11.83 7.07 33.441
13 0 0 8 1 0.40 13.07 7.07 68.063
14 0 0 8 1 0.40 14.32 7.07 71.584
11 0 0 7 1 0.40 15.56 7.07 74.680
12 30 23 7 1 0.40 16.47 7.07 77.245
5 0 0 3 1 0.30 16.47 7.07 56.132
7 0 0 4 1 0.30 16.47 7.07 63.200
14 0 0 8 1 0.40 16.47 7.07 77.67
24 0 0 16 0.3 0.40 16.47 7.07 80.50
11 0 0 7 0.6 0.40 16.47 7.07 77.245
9 0 0 5 0.9 0.30 16.47 7.07 64.967
11 0 0 7 0.6 0.40 16.47 7.07 77.245
12 0 0 7 0.6 0.40 16.47 7.07 77.245
22 5 4 25 0.3 0.40 16.47 7.07 99.582
29 0 0 18 0.3 0.40 16.47 7.07 84.738
36 0 0 20 0.3 0.40 16.47 7.07 88.979
38 0 0 20 0.3 0.40 16.47 7.07 88.979
32 0 0 20 0.3 0.40 16.47 7.07 88.979
43 28 21 6 0.8 0.40 16.47 7.07 78.38
28 0 0 18 0.3 0.40 16.47 7.07 84.74
25 0 0 18 0.3 0.40 16.47 7.07 84.74
26 0 0 18 0.3 0.40 0.00 7.07 38.17
26 0 0 18 0.3 0.40 0.00 7.07 38.17
Total Friction Σ 1705 T

6
9

16.47 t/m2
factor of 0.67
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge ove

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Cap

Proposed Pile Diameter : 2.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 110 m As per GAD Drawing no. R

Dia of Pile D 2.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Tip γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length
Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil sioil description incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.81 5 0.12 1.00

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.81 5 0.24 1.00
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.81 4 0.36 1.00
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.81 5 0.49 1.00
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.81 3 0.61 1.00
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.81 6 0.73 1.00
7 Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.81 9 0.85 1.00
8 Plastic 12 1.5 0.81 8 0.97 1.00
9 Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.81 2 1.09 1.00
10 Plastic 15 1.5 0.81 3 1.22 1.00
11 Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.81 8 1.34 1.00
12 Plastic 18 1.5 0.81 4 1.46 1.00
medium to high
13 Plastic plasticity clayey silt 19.5 1.5 0.81 5 1.58 1.00
14 Plastic 21 1.5 0.81 6 1.70 1.00
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 7 1.87 1.00
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 8 1.99 1.00
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 8 2.12 1.00
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 22 2.24 1.00
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 30 2.37 1.00
20 Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 7 2.49 1.00
21 Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 21 2.61 1.00
22 Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 32 2.74 1.00
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 29 2.86 1.00
24 Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 30 2.99 1.00
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 27 3.11 0.62
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 61 3.24 0.61
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 50 3.36 0.60
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 29 3.49 0.58
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 27 3.61 0.57
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 32 3.74 0.56
silty sand
31 Non Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 32 3.86 0.55
32 Non Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 36 3.98 0.54
33 Non Plastic 49.5 1.5 0.83 34 4.11 0.53
34 Non Plastic 51 1.5 0.83 41 4.23 0.52
35 Non Plastic 52.5 1.5 0.83 37 4.36 0.51
36 Non Plastic 54 1.5 0.83 38 4.48 0.50
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 0.83 24 4.61 1.00
medium to high
38 Plastic 57 1.5 0.83 22 4.73 1.00
plasticity clayey silt
39 Plastic 58.5 1.5 0.83 22 4.86 1.00

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.96 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 510 T

(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)
Qb
Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line
Qb c*Nc*Ap 190.8517537056

701

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1587.17 701.27
(i) Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
Working Capacity of Pile = 994 T
(ii)
Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 915 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 915

Recommended Pile Load 915 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 756 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
PAIRA Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

oad Carrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P16

AD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-09

Final corrected Eff.

Corrected SPT
value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
( N' ) Value (For Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Overburden)
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi Asi
5 5 0 0 3 1 0.00 0.61 11.78
5 5 0 0 3 1 0.00 1.82 11.78
4 4 0 0 2 1 0.00 3.04 11.78
5 5 0 0 3 1 0.00 4.25 11.78
3 3 0 0 3 1 0.00 5.47 11.78
6 6 0 0 2 1 0.00 6.68 11.78
9 9 0 0 5 1 0.00 7.90 11.78
8 8 0 0 4 1 0.00 9.11 11.78
2 2 0 0 1 1 0.00 9.96 11.78
3 3 0 0 2 1 0.00 9.96 11.78
8 8 0 0 4 1 0.00 9.96 11.78
4 4 0 0 2 1 0.00 9.96 11.78
5 5 0 0 3 1 0.00 9.96 11.78
6 6 0 0 3 1 0.00 9.96 11.78
7 7 0 0 4 1 0.00 9.96 11.78
8 8 0 0 4 1 0.00 9.96 11.78
8 8 0 0 4 1 0.00 9.96 11.78
22 22 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 9.96 11.78
30 30 0 0 15 0.3 0.00 9.96 11.78
7 7 0 0 3 1.0 0.00 9.96 11.78
21 21 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 9.96 11.78
32 32 0 0 16 0.3 0.00 9.96 11.78
29 29 0 0 15 0.3 0.00 9.96 11.78
30 30 0 0 15 0.3 0.00 9.96 11.78
17 16 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 11.78
37 26 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 11.78
30 22 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 11.78
17 16 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 11.78
15 15 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 11.78
18 16 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 11.78
18 16 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 11.78
19 17 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 11.78
18 16 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 11.78
21 18 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 11.78
19 17 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 11.78
19 17 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 11.78
24 24 0 0 12 0.4 0.00 9.96 11.78
22 22 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 9.96 11.78
22 22 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 9.96 11.78

Total Friction Σ

8
12

9.96 t/m2
Guide line
 Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
Non plasticPlastic soil 40 535
Non plasticPlastic soil 45 584
Non plasticPlastic soil 50 634
plastic soil 55 756.00

ctor of 0.7
 Friction (Tons)

(αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
35.343
35.34
23.562
35.343
35.34
23.56
50.069
47.124
11.781
23.562
47.124
23.562
35.343
35.343
47.124
47.124
47.12
51.84
57.432
35.343
51.836
56.549
57.432
57.432
46.935
46.935
46.935
46.94
46.94
46.94
46.94
46.94
46.94
46.94
46.94
46.94
52.31
51.84
51.84

1587 T
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge ov

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Ca

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 55 m As per GAD Drawing no

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Tip γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length
Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil soil description incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m)

1 Plastic low plasticity silt with 1.5 1.5 0.83 1 0.12 1.00
2 Plastic clay 3 1.5 0.83 2 0.25 1.00
3 Non Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.83 15 0.37 1.33
4 Non Plastic 6 1.5 0.83 27 0.50 1.23
5 Non Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.83 22 0.62 1.16
6 Non Plastic 9 1.5 0.83 16 0.75 1.10
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.83 22 0.87 1.05
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 0.83 23 1.00 1.00
9 Non Plastic sity sand 13.5 1.5 0.83 27 1.12 0.96
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 0.83 29 1.25 0.93
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.83 26 1.37 0.90
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 0.83 28 1.49 0.87
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.83 29 1.62 0.84
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 0.83 29 1.74 0.82
15 Non Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 31 1.87 0.79
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 35 1.99 1.00
17 Plastic low plasticity silt with 25.5 1.5 0.83 38 2.12 1.00
18 Plastic clay 27 1.5 0.83 38 2.24 1.00
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.83 44 2.37 1.00
20 Non Plastic 30 1.5 0.83 38 2.49 0.70
21 Non Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 26 2.61 0.68
22 Non Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 22 2.74 0.66
23 Non Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 24 2.86 0.65
sity sand
24 Non Plastic 36 1.5 0.83 27 2.99 0.64
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 30 3.11 0.62
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 0.83 36 3.24 0.61
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 29 3.36 0.60
29 Plastic hard low plasticity 43.5 1.5 0.83 34 3.61 1.00
sandy silt with trace
30 Plastic clay 45 1.5 0.83 35 3.74 1.00

31 Non Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 33 3.86 0.55

32 Non Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 42 3.98 0.54
33 Non Plastic 49.5 1.5 0.83 41 4.11 0.53
34 Non Plastic 51 1.5 0.83 44 4.23 0.52
35 Non Plastic sity sand 52.5 1.5 0.83 50 4.36 0.51
36 Non Plastic 54 1.5 0.83 46 4.48 0.50
37 Non Plastic 55.5 1.5 0.83 68 4.61 0.49
38 Non Plastic 57 1.5 0.83 63 4.73 0.48
39 Non Plastic 58.5 1.5 0.83 70 4.86 0.47

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.96 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT >30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 510 T

(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)
Qb
Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line
Qb c*Nc*Ap
0
(3) Capacity of Pile : 510

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1132.22 510.42
(i) Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
Working Capacity of Pile = 712 T
(ii)
Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 657 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 657

Recommended Pile Load 657 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 542 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
AIRA Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ad Carrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P18

AD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-11

Final corrected Eff.

Corrected SPT
value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
( N' ) Value (For Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Overburden)
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi Asi
1 1 0 0 1 1 0.00 0.62 7.07
2 2 0 0 1 1 0.00 1.87 7.07
20 17 26 20 0 0 0.40 3.11 7.07
33 24 26 20 0 0 0.40 4.36 7.07
26 20 26 20 0 0 0.40 5.60 7.07
18 16 26 20 0 0 0.40 6.85 7.07
23 19 26 20 0 0 0.40 8.09 7.07
23 19 26 20 0 0 0.40 9.34 7.07
26 21 26 20 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
27 21 26 20 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
23 19 26 20 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
24 20 26 20 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
24 20 29 22 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
24 19 29 22 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
25 20 29 22 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
35 35 20 15 9 0.5 0.40 9.96 7.07
38 38 20 15 9 0.5 0.40 9.96 7.07
38 38 20 15 9 0.5 0.40 9.96 7.07
44 44 20 15 9 0.5 0.40 9.96 7.07
26 21 29 22 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
18 16 29 22 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
15 15 29 22 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
16 15 29 22 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
17 16 29 22 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
19 17 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
22 18 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
17 16 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
34 34 20 15 17 0.3 0.40 9.96 7.07
35 35 20 15 17 0.3 0.40 9.96
7.07
18 17 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
23 19 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
22 18 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
23 19 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
25 20 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
23 19 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
33 24 34 26 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
30 23 34 26 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
33 24 34 26 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07

Total Friction Σ

8
12

9.96 t/m2
Guide line
 Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
Non plasticPlastic soil 40 428
plastic soil 45 550
Non plasticPlastic soil 50 503
Non plasticPlastic soil 55 542

or of 0.7
 Friction (Tons)

(αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
3.534
7.07
8.800
12.321
15.84
19.36
22.881
26.401
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
59.970
59.97
59.97
59.970
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
64.21
64.21
28.16
28.16
28.16
28.16
28.16
28.16
28.16
28.16
28.16

1132 T
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge ov

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Ca

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 55 m As per GAD Drawing no

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Tip γ 0.8 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length
Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil soil description incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.83 4 0.12 1.00

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.83 5 0.25 1.00
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.83 3 0.37 1.00
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.83 4 0.50 1.00
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.83 6 0.62 1.00
6 Plastic medium plasticity with 9 1.5 0.83 2 0.75 1.00
7 Plastic clayey silt 10.5 1.5 0.83 11 0.87 1.00
8 Plastic 12 1.5 0.83 7 1.00 1.00
9 Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.83 9 1.12 1.00
10 Plastic 15 1.5 0.83 13 1.25 1.00
11 Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.83 6 1.37 1.00
12 Plastic 18 1.5 0.83 10 1.49 1.00
13 Nonplastic 19.5 1.5 0.83 12 1.62 0.84
14 Nonplastic silty sand 21 1.5 0.83 9 1.74 0.82
15 Nonplastic 22.5 1.5 0.83 16 1.87 0.79
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.83 21 1.99 1.00
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.83 21 2.12 1.00
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.83 9 2.24 1.00
19 Plastic medium plasticity with 28.5 1.5 0.83 5 2.37 1.00
20 Plastic clayey silt 30 1.5 0.83 14 2.49 1.00
21 Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.83 10 2.61 1.00
22 Plastic 33 1.5 0.83 12 2.74 1.00
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.83 18 2.86 1.00
24 Nonplastic 36 1.5 0.83 31 2.99 0.64
25 Nonplastic 37.5 1.5 0.83 28 3.11 0.62
silty sand
26 Nonplastic 39 1.5 0.83 31 3.24 0.61
27 Nonplastic 40.5 1.5 0.83 28 3.36 0.60
28 Plastic 42 1.5 0.83 32 3.49 1.00
29 Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.83 26 3.61 1.00
30 Plastic 45 1.5 0.83 29 3.74 1.00
31 Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.83 30 3.86 1.00
32 Plastic 48 1.5 0.83 27 3.98 1.00
33 Plastic stiff to hard medium to 49.5 1.5 0.83 17 4.11 1.00
high plasticity,clayey
34 Plastic with trace sand 51 1.5 0.83 20 4.23 1.00
35 Plastic 52.5 1.5 0.83 16 4.36 1.00
36 Plastic 54 1.5 0.83 20 4.48 1.00
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 0.83 15 4.61 1.00
38 Plastic 57 1.5 0.83 19 4.73 1.00
39 Plastic 58.5 1.5 0.83 17 4.86 1.00

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.80 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.60 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT>30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 492 T

(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)
Qb
Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line
Qb c*Nc*Ap 238.564692132
731

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 687.49 491.97
(i) Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
Working Capacity of Pile = 484 T
(ii)
Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 472 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 472

Recommended Pile Load 472 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 381 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
AIRA Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ad Carrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P17

AD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-11

Final corrected Eff.

Corrected SPT
value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
( N' ) Value (For Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Overburden)
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi Asi
4 4 0 0 2 1 0.00 0.62 7.07
5 5 0 0 3 1 0.00 1.87 7.07
3 3 0 0 2 1 0.00 3.11 7.07
4 4 0 0 2 1 0.00 4.36 7.07
6 6 0 0 3 1 0.00 5.60 7.07
2 2 0 0 1 1 0.00 6.85 7.07
11 11 0 0 6 1 0.00 8.09 7.07
7 7 0 0 4 1 0.00 9.34 7.07
9 9 0 0 5 1 0.00 9.60 7.07
13 13 0 0 6 1 0.00 9.60 7.07
6 6 0 0 3 1 0.00 9.60 7.07
10 10 0 0 5 1 0.00 9.60 7.07
10 10 26 20 0 0 0.40 9.60 7.07
7 7 26 20 0 0 0.30 9.60 7.07
13 13 26 20 0 0 0.40 9.60 7.07
21 21 0 0 10 0 0.00 9.60 7.07
21 21 0 0 10 0 0.00 9.60 7.07
9 9 0 0 5 0.9 0.00 9.60 7.07
5 5 0 0 3 1.0 0.00 9.60 7.07
14 14 0 0 7 0.6 0.00 9.60 7.07
10 10 0 0 5 0.9 0.00 9.60 7.07
12 12 0 0 6 0.8 0.00 9.60 7.07
18 18 0 0 9 0.5 0.00 9.60 7.07
20 17 27 20 0 0.0 0.40 9.60 7.07
17 16 27 20 0 0.0 0.40 9.60 7.07
19 17 27 20 0 0.0 0.40 9.60 7.07
17 16 27 20 0 0.0 0.40 9.60 7.07
32 32 0 0 16 0.3 0.00 9.60 7.07
26 26 0 0 13 0.4 0.00 9.60 7.07
29 29 0 0 15 0.3 0.00 9.60 7.07
30 30 0 0 15 0.3 0.00 9.60 7.07
27 27 0 0 14 0.3 0.00 9.60 7.07
17 17 0 0 8 0.6 0.00 9.60 7.07
20 20 0 0 10 0.5 0.00 9.60 7.07
16 16 0 0 8 0.6 0.00 9.60 7.07
20 20 0 0 10 0.5 0.00 9.60 7.07
15 15 0 0 7 0.6 0.00 9.60 7.07
19 19 0 0 10 0.5 0.00 9.60 7.07
17 17 0 0 8 0.6 0.00 9.60 7.07

Total Friction Σ

8
12

9.6 t/m2
Guide line
 Group Effect
Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
Non plasticPlastic soil 40 381
plastic soil 45 485
plastic soil 50 487
plastic soil 55 526.00

or of 0.7
 Friction (Tons)

(αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
14.137
21.21
14.137
14.137
21.21
7.07
31.809
28.274
30.041
31.809
21.206
30.041
27.143
20.358
27.143
31.809
31.81
30.04
21.206
30.678
30.041
31.809
31.809
27.143
27.143
27.143
27.143
33.93
32.16
34.46
34.46
32.16
31.10
31.81
31.10
31.81
30.68
31.81
31.10

687 T
 soil description
Layer depth as per soil description
Soil Layer From(m) Depth of Layer
(m) Geotechnical as per Drilling
Report

1 0.0 1.5 1.5

2 1.5 3 1.5
silty clay
3 3.0 4.5 1.5
4 4.5 6 1.5
5 6.0 7.5 1.5
6 7.5 9 1.5
7 9.0 10.5 1.5
8 10.5 12 1.5
9 12.0 13.5 1.5
10 13.5 15 1.5
11 15.0 16.5 1.5
12 16.5 18 1.5
13 18.0 19.5 1.5
14 19.5 21 1.5
15 21.0 22.5 1.5 Silty sand
16 22.5 24 1.5
Silty sand
17 24.0 25.5 1.5
18 25.5 27 1.5
19 27.0 28.5 1.5
20 28.5 30 1.5
21 30.0 31.5 1.5
22 31.5 33 1.5
23 33.0 34.5 1.5
24 34.5 36 1.5
25 36.0 37.5 1.5
26 37.5 39 1.5
27 39.0 40.5 1.5
28 40.5 42 1.5
29 42.0 43.5 1.5
30 43.5 45 1.5
Wood mix with
sand
31 45.0 46.5 1.5

32 46.5 48 1.5
33 48.0 49.5 1.5
34 49.5 51 1.5 Silty Sand
35 51.0 52.5 1.5 Clayey sity sand
36 52.5 54 1.5
37 54.0 55.5 1.5
38 55.5 57 1.5
39 57.0 58.5 1.5 Clay layer with
small course
40 58.5 60 1.5 sand
41 60.0 61.5 1.5
42 61.5 63 1.5
43 63.0 64.5 1.5
Clay layer
44 64.5 66 1.5
45 66.0 67.5 1.5
46 67.5 69 1.5 Silty sand with
47 69.0 70.5 1.5 mica
48 70.5 72 1.5
49 72.0 73.5 1.5 Yellow Clay
Silt with clay and Layer
50 73.5 75 1.5
sand
51 75.0 76.5 1.5
52 76.5 78 1.5
Sandy silt
53 78.0 79.5 1.5
54 79.5 81 1.5
Clay Layer
55 81.0 82.5 1.5
56 82.5 84 1.5 Clay with small
57 84.0 85.5 1.5 Clayey sity sand course sand
58 85.5 87 1.5
59 87.0 88.5 1.5
Clay Layer
60 88.5 90 1.5
61 90.0 91.5 1.5
62 91.5 93 1.5 Clay with small
63 93.0 94.5 1.5 course sand
64 94.5 96 1.5
65 96.0 97.5 1.5
66 97.5 99 1.5
67 99.0 100.5 1.5
Clay Layer
68 100.5 102 1.5
69 102.0 103.2 1.5
70 103.2 105 1.5
71 105.0 106.5 1.5
72 106.5 108 1.5
73 108.0 109.5 1.5
74 109.5 111 1.5 Silty sand with
small coarse
75 111.0 112.5 1.5 sand
76 112.5 114 1.5
77 114.0 115.5 1.5
78 115.5 117 1.5
79 117.0 118.5 1.5
Silty sand
80 118.5 120 1.5
81 120.0 121.5 1.5
82 121.5 123 1.5 Very Dense silty
Sand Silty sand with
crushed stone
83 123.0 124.5 1.5 and wood

84 124.5 126 1.5

Clay sand
85 126.0 127.5 1.5
86 127.5 129 1.5
87 129.0 130.5 1.5
Clay layer with
88 130.5 132 1.5
stone fraction
89 132.0 133.5 1.5
90 133.5 135 1.5
91 135.0 136.5 1.5
92 136.5 138 1.5
93 138.0 139.5 1.5
94 139.5 141 1.5
95 141.0 142.5 1.5
96 142.5 144 1.5
Not drilling
97 144.0 145.5 1.5
98 145.5 147 1.5
99 147.0 148.5 1.5
100 148.5 150 1.5
101 150.0 151.5 1.5
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge ov

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Ca

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 66 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA B

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.83 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length
Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Z/2 Field SPT
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m)

1 Non Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.75 0.8 2 0.12 1.40

2 Non Plastic 3 1.5 2.25 0.8 3 0.24 1.40
3 Non Plastic 4.5 1.5 3.75 0.8 1 0.36 1.34
4 Non Plastic 6 1.5 5.25 0.8 2 0.48 1.25
5 Non Plastic 7.5 1.5 6.75 0.8 4 0.60 1.17
6 Non Plastic 9 1.5 8.25 0.8 3 0.72 1.11
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 9.75 0.8 4 0.84 1.06
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 11.25 0.8 6 0.96 1.02
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 12.75 0.8 7 1.08 0.98
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 14.25 0.8 12 1.20 0.94
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 15.75 0.8 16 1.32 0.91
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 17.25 0.8 19 1.44 0.88
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 18.75 0.8 18 1.56 0.85
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 20.25 0.8 17 1.68 0.83
15 Non Plastic 22.5 1.5 21.75 0.8 18 1.80 0.81
16 Non Plastic 24 1.5 23.25 0.8 20 1.92 0.78
17 Non Plastic 25.5 1.5 24.75 0.8 22 2.04 0.76
18 Non Plastic 27 1.5 26.25 0.8 25 2.16 0.74
19 Non Plastic 28.5 1.5 27.75 0.8 24 2.28 0.73
20 Non Plastic 30 1.5 29.25 0.8 30 2.40 0.71
21 Non Plastic 31.5 1.5 30.75 0.8 26 2.52 0.69
22 Non Plastic 33 1.5 32.25 0.8 24 2.64 0.68
23 Non Plastic 34.5 1.5 33.75 0.8 28 2.76 0.66
24 Non Plastic 36 1.5 35.25 0.8 33 2.88 0.65
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 36.75 0.8 41 3.00 0.63
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 38.25 0.8 45 3.12 0.62
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 39.75 0.8 44 3.24 0.61
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 41.25 0.8 37 3.36 0.60
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 42.75 0.8 37 3.48 0.58
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 44.25 0.8 41 3.60 0.57
31 Non Plastic 46.5 1.5 45.75 0.8 32 3.72 0.56
32 Non Plastic 48 1.5 47.25 0.8 36 3.84 0.55
33 Non Plastic 49.5 1.5 48.75 0.83 42 4.11 0.53
34 Non Plastic 51 1.5 50.25 0.83 44 4.23 0.52
35 Non Plastic 52.5 1.5 51.75 0.83 17 4.36 0.51
36 Non Plastic 54 1.5 53.25 0.83 17 4.48 0.50
37 Non Plastic 55.5 1.5 54.75 0.83 22 4.61 0.49
38 Non Plastic 57 1.5 56.25 0.83 22 4.73 0.48
39 Non Plastic 58.5 1.5 57.75 0.83 28 4.86 0.47
40 Plastic 60 1.5 59.25 0.83 32 4.98 1.00
41 Plastic 61.5 1.5 60.75 0.83 40 5.10 1.00

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.83 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.96 t/m2

Nq = 40 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line
 Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 686 T T

(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)

Qb Cb. Nc. Ap
Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line
Qb 318.086256

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 884.96 686.43
(i) Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
Working Capacity of Pile = 639 T
(ii)

Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 629 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 629

Recommended Pile Load 629 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 506 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
struction of PAIRA Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

tic Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P21

ithout steel liner

AD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-05

Final corrected Eff.

Corrected SPT
value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
( N' ) Value (For Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Overburden)
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi Asi
3 3 28 28 0 0 0.30 0.60 7.07
4 4 28 28 0 0 0.30 1.80 7.07
1 1 28 28 0 0 0.30 3.00 7.07
2 2 28 28 0 0 0.30 4.20 7.07
5 5 29 29 0 0 0.30 5.40 7.07
3 3 28 28 0 0 0.30 6.60 7.07
4 4 28 28 0 0 0.30 7.80 7.07
6 6 29 29 0 0 0.30 9.00 7.07
7 7 30 30 0 0 0.30 9.96 7.07
11 11 30 30 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
15 15 31 31 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
17 16 31 31 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
15 15 31 31 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
14 14 30 30 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
14 14 31 31 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
16 15 31 31 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
17 16 31 31 0 0 0.40 9.96 7.07
19 17 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
17 16 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
21 18 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
18 17 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
16 16 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
19 17 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
21 18 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
26 21 32 32 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
28 21 32 32 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
27 21 33 33 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
22 19 32 32 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
22 18 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
24 19 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
18 16 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 7.47 7.07
20 17 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 7.47 7.07
22 19 32 32 20 0.3 0.40 9.96 7.07
23 19 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
9 9 31 31 0 0.0 0.30 9.96 7.07
9 9 31 31 0 0.0 0.30 9.96 7.07
11 11 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
11 11 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
13 13 31 31 0 0.0 0.40 9.96 7.07
32 32 20 20 9 0.500 0.40 9.96 7.07
40 40 31 31 18 0.3 0.40 9.96 7.07

Total Friction Σ

8
12

9.96 t/m2
Guide line
 Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)

non plastic sil 40 359

non plastic sil 45 382

non plastic sil 50 481

non plastic sil 55 506

ced by a factor of 0.7

 Friction (Tons)

(αxC+KxtanδxPDi)xAsi
1.272
3.82
6.362
8.906
11.45
14.00
16.540
19.085
21.121
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.16
28.16
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.161
28.16
28.16
28.16
21.12
21.12
70.57
28.16
21.12
21.12
28.16
28.16
28.16
59.97
66.33
884.96
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridg

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carryin

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 36 m As per GAD Dra

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Tip γ 0.8 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length
Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Z/2 Field SPT
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2)
depth (m)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.75 0.8 2 0.12

2 Plastic 3 1.5 2.25 0.8 2 0.24
3 Plastic medium plasticity 4.5 1.5 3.75 0.8 1 0.36
4 Plastic clayey silt 6 1.5 5.25 0.8 2 0.48
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 6.75 0.8 3 0.60
6 Plastic 9 1.5 8.25 0.8 4 0.72
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 9.75 0.8 10 0.84
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 11.25 0.8 13 0.96
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 12.75 0.8 12 1.08
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 14.25 0.8 14 1.20
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 15.75 0.8 10 1.32
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 17.25 0.8 10 1.44
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 18.75 0.8 16 1.56
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 20.25 0.8 17 1.68
15 Non Plastic 22.5 1.5 21.75 0.8 23 1.80
16 Non Plastic 24 1.5 23.25 0.8 26 1.92
17 Non Plastic 25.5 1.5 24.75 0.8 24 2.04
18 Non Plastic 27 1.5 26.25 0.8 19 2.16
19 Non Plastic 28.5 1.5 27.75 0.8 20 2.28
20 Non Plastic silty sand 30 1.5 29.25 0.8 22 2.40
21 Non Plastic 31.5 1.5 30.75 0.8 22 2.52
22 Non Plastic 33 1.5 32.25 0.8 20 2.64
23 Non Plastic 34.5 1.5 33.75 0.8 31 2.76
24 Non Plastic 36 1.5 35.25 0.8 38 2.88
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 36.75 0.8 27 3.00
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 38.25 0.8 26 3.12
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 39.75 0.8 28 3.24
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 41.25 0.8 44 3.36
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 42.75 0.8 60 3.48
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 44.25 0.8 61 3.60
31 Non Plastic 46.5 1.5 45.75 0.8 34 3.72
32 Non Plastic 48 1.5 47.25 0.8 40 3.84
33 Plastic 49.5 1.5 48.75 0.83 18 4.11
34 Plastic 51 1.5 50.25 0.83 17 4.23
35 Plastic 52.5 1.5 51.75 0.83 17 4.36
36 Plastic 54 1.5 53.25 0.83 17 4.48
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 54.75 0.83 22 4.61
38 Plastic 57 1.5 56.25 0.83 22 4.73
39 Plastic 58.5 1.5 57.75 0.83 28 4.86
40 Plastic 60 1.5 59.25 0.83 32 4.98
41 Plastic stiff to hard medium 61.5 1.5 60.75 0.83 40 5.10
42 Plastic plasticity silt with clay 63 1.5 62.25 0.83 34 5.23
43 Plastic 64.5 1.5 63.75 0.83 48 5.35
44 Plastic 66 1.5 65.25 0.83 52 5.48
45 Plastic 67.5 1.5 66.75 0.83 59 5.60
46 Plastic 69 1.5 68.25 0.83 52 5.73
47 Plastic 70.5 1.5 69.75 0.83 55 5.85
48 Plastic 72 1.5 71.25 0.83 50 5.98
49 Plastic 73.5 1.5 72.75 0.83 60 6.10
50 Plastic 75 1.5 74.25 0.83 57 6.23
(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.80 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.60 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 492 T T

(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)
Qb Cb. Nc. Ap
Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line
Qb 174.947441

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile =
(i) Fcator of Safety
Working Capacity of Pile
(ii)
Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5
889.65 666.92
= 2 3.5
= 635 T
= 623 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 623

Recommended Pile Load 623 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 502 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
truction of PAIRA Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

c Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P22

steel liner

As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-05

Final corrected Eff.

Corrected SPT
Overburden value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
( N' ) Value (For Ø K tanδ
Correction Factor Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Overburden)
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi

1.00 2 2 0 0 1 1 0.00 0.60

1.00 2 2 0 0 1 1 0.00 1.80
1.00 1 1 0 0 1 1 0.00 3.00
1.00 2 2 0 0 1 1 0.00 4.20
1.00 3 3 0 0 2 1 0.00 5.40
1.00 4 4 0 0 2 1 0.00 6.60
1.06 11 11 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.80
1.02 13 13 30 23 6 1 0.40 9.00
0.98 12 12 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.60
0.94 13 13 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.60
0.91 9 9 29 22 0 0 0.30 9.60
0.88 9 9 29 22 0 0 0.30 9.60
0.85 14 14 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.60
0.83 14 14 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.60
0.81 19 17 31 23 0 0 0.40 9.60
0.78 20 18 31 23 0 0 0.40 9.60
0.76 18 17 31 23 0 0 0.40 9.60
0.74 14 14 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
0.73 15 15 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
0.71 16 15 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
0.69 15 15 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
0.68 14 14 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
0.66 21 18 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
0.65 25 20 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
0.63 17 16 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
0.62 16 16 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
0.61 17 16 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
0.60 26 21 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
0.58 35 25 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
0.57 35 25 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
0.56 19 17 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
0.55 22 19 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 9.60
1.00 18 18 0 0 9 0.5 0.00 9.60
1.00 17 17 0 0 9 0.5 0.00 9.60
1.00 17 17 0 0 9 0.5 0.00 9.60
1.00 17 17 0 0 9 0.5 0.00 9.60
1.00 22 22 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 9.60
1.00 22 22 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 9.60
1.00 28 28 0 0 14 0.3 0.00 9.60
1.00 32 32 0 0 16 0.3 0.00 9.60
1.00 40 40 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 9.60
1.00 34 34 0 0 17 0.3 0.00 9.60
1.00 48 48 0 0 22 0.3 0.00 9.60
1.00 52 52 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 9.60
1.00 59 59 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 9.60
1.00 52 52 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 9.60
1.00 55 55 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 9.60
1.00 50 50 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 9.60
1.00 60 60 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 9.60
1.00 57 57 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 9.60
 8
12

9.6 t/m2
HD-Bridge design Guide line

Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
plastic 40 349
plastic 45 378
plastic 50 449
plastic 55 502

by a factor of 0.7
Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)

(αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
Asi
7.07 7.069
7.07 7.07
7.07 7.069
7.07 7.069
7.07 14.14
7.07 14.14
7.07 22.054
7.07 57.256
7.07 27.143
7.07 27.143
7.07 20.358
7.07 20.358
7.07 27.143
7.07 27.143
7.07 27.143
7.07 27.143
7.07 27.14
7.07 27.14
7.07 27.143
7.07 27.143
7.07 27.143
7.07 27.143
7.07 27.143
7.07 27.143
7.07 27.143
7.07 27.143
7.07 27.143
7.07 27.14
7.07 27.14
7.07 27.14
7.07 27.14
7.07 27.14
7.07 31.81
7.07 31.81
7.07 31.81
7.07 31.81
7.07 31.10
7.07 31.10
7.07 32.16
7.07 33.93
7.07 42.41
7.07 36.05
7.07 46.65
7.07 42.41
7.07 38.17
7.07 38.17
7.07 38.17
7.07 38.17
7.07 38.17
7.07 38.17

Total Friction Σ 890 T

 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the Riv

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 48 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/P

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.8 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length Corrected SPT

Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Field SPT ( N' ) Value (For
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m) Overburden)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.8 7 0.12 1.00 7

2 Plastic 3 1.5 0.8 2 0.24 1.00 2
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 0.8 3 0.36 1.00 3
4 Plastic 6 1.5 0.8 2 0.48 1.00 2
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 0.8 3 0.60 1.00 3
6 Plastic 9 1.5 0.8 4 0.72 1.00 4
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 0.8 6 0.84 1.06 6
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 0.8 10 0.96 1.02 10
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 0.8 10 1.08 0.98 10
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 0.8 9 1.20 0.94 8
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 0.8 14 1.32 0.91 13
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 0.8 15 1.44 0.88 13
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 0.8 16 1.56 0.85 14
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 0.8 14 1.68 0.83 12
15 Plastic 22.5 1.5 0.8 17 1.80 1.00 17
16 Plastic 24 1.5 0.8 19 1.92 1.00 19
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 0.8 16 2.04 1.00 16
18 Plastic 27 1.5 0.8 18 2.16 1.00 18
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 0.8 14 2.28 1.00 14
20 Plastic 30 1.5 0.8 13 2.40 1.00 13
21 Plastic 31.5 1.5 0.8 12 2.52 1.00 12
22 Plastic 33 1.5 0.8 15 2.64 1.00 15
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 0.8 18 2.76 1.00 18
24 Plastic 36 1.5 0.8 16 2.88 1.00 16
25 Plastic 37.5 1.5 0.8 18 3.00 1.00 18
26 Plastic 39 1.5 0.8 20 3.12 1.00 20
27 Plastic 40.5 1.5 0.8 14 3.24 1.00 14
28 Plastic 42 1.5 0.8 17 3.36 1.00 17
29 Plastic 43.5 1.5 0.8 20 3.48 1.00 20
30 Plastic 45 1.5 0.8 18 3.60 1.00 18
31 Plastic 46.5 1.5 0.8 19 3.72 1.00 19
32 Plastic 48 1.5 0.8 24 3.84 1.00 24
33 Plastic 49.5 1.5 0.8 18 3.96 1.00 18
34 Plastic 51 1.5 0.8 17 4.08 1.00 17
35 Plastic 52.5 1.5 0.8 17 4.20 1.00 17
36 Plastic 54 1.5 0.8 17 4.32 1.00 17
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 0.8 22 4.44 1.00 22
38 Plastic 57 1.5 0.8 22 4.56 1.00 22

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.80 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 9.60 t/m2

Nq = 30 For corrected SPT 10-30 For bored pile As per RHD-Bridge design Guide line

Qu1 = σv (Nq-1)*Ap 746 T

(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)
Qb Cb. Nc. Ap

Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line

Qb 286.277631

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1007.13 1032.72
(i) Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
Working Capacity of Pile = 799 T
(ii)
Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 816 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 799

Recommended Pile Load 799 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 648 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

arrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P23

HD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-05

Final corrected Eff.

value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2) Friction (Tons)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi Asi (αxC+KxtanδxPDi)xAsi

7 0 0 4 1 0.00 0.60 7.07 28.274
2 0 0 0 0 0.00 1.80 7.07 0.00
3 0 0 1 1 0.00 3.00 7.07 7.069
2 0 0 0 0 0.00 4.20 7.07 0.000
3 0 0 1 1 0.00 5.40 7.07 7.07
4 0 0 2 1 0.00 6.60 7.07 14.14
6 29 22 0 0 0.30 7.80 7.07 16.540
10 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.00 7.07 25.447
10 29 22 0 0 0.30 9.60 7.07 20.358
8 29 22 0 0 0.30 9.60 7.07 20.358
13 32 24 0 0 0.40 9.60 7.07 27.143
13 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.60 7.07 27.143
14 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.60 7.07 27.143
12 30 23 0 0 0.40 9.60 7.07 27.143
17 0 0 11 0.40 0.00 9.60 7.07 31.102
19 0 0 12 0.37 0.00 9.60 7.07 31.385
16 0 0 10 0.45 0.00 9.60 7.07 31.81
18 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 9.60 7.07 31.10
14 0 0 9 0.5 0.00 9.60 7.07 31.809
13 0 0 8 0.6 0.00 9.60 7.07 31.102
12 0 0 7 0.6 0.00 9.60 7.07 30.678
15 0 0 10 0.5 0.00 9.60 7.07 31.809
18 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 9.60 7.07 31.102
16 0 0 10 0.5 0.00 9.60 7.07 31.809
18 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 9.60 7.07 31.102
20 0 0 13 0.4 0.00 9.60 7.07 32.162
14 0 0 9 0.5 0.00 9.60 7.07 31.809
17 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 9.60 7.07 31.10
20 0 0 13 0.4 0.00 9.60 7.07 32.16
18 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 9.60 7.07 31.10
19 0 0 12 0.4 0.00 0.00 7.07 31.38
24 0 0 16 0.3 0.00 0.00 7.07 33.93
18 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 0.00 7.07 38.17
17 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 0.00 7.07 38.17
17 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 0.00 7.07 38.17
17 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 0.00 7.07 38.17
22 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 0.00 7.07 38.17
22 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 0.00 7.07 38.17

Total Friction Σ 1007 T

8
12

9.6 t/m2
 Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
plastic 40 484
plastic 45 526
plastic 50 594
plastic 55 648

factor of 0.7
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the R

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 52 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA B

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.8 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length
Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Z/2 Field SPT
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.75 0.8 2 0.12 1.00

2 Plastic 3 1.5 2.25 0.8 1 0.24 1.00
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 3.75 0.8 3 0.36 1.00
4 Plastic 6 1.5 5.25 0.8 4 0.48 1.00
5 Non Plastic 7.5 1.5 6.75 0.8 9 0.60 1.17
6 Non Plastic 9 1.5 8.25 0.8 10 0.72 1.11
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 9.75 0.8 8 0.84 1.06
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 11.25 0.8 7 0.96 1.02
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 12.75 0.8 8 1.08 0.98
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 14.25 0.8 14 1.20 0.94
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 15.75 0.8 12 1.32 0.91
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 17.25 0.8 12 1.44 0.88
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 18.75 0.8 23 1.56 0.85
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 20.25 0.8 24 1.68 0.83
15 Non Plastic 22.5 1.5 21.75 0.8 28 1.80 0.81
16 Non Plastic 24 1.5 23.25 0.8 91 1.92 0.78
17 Non Plastic 25.5 1.5 24.75 0.8 20 2.04 0.76
18 Non Plastic 27 1.5 26.25 0.8 16 2.16 0.74
19 Non Plastic 28.5 1.5 27.75 0.8 24 2.28 0.73
20 Non Plastic 30 1.5 29.25 0.8 26 2.40 0.71
21 Non Plastic 31.5 1.5 30.75 0.8 18 2.52 0.69
22 Non Plastic 33 1.5 32.25 0.8 16 2.64 0.68
23 Non Plastic 34.5 1.5 33.75 0.8 24 2.76 0.66
24 Plastic 36 1.5 35.25 0.8 22 2.88 1.00
25 Plastic 37.5 1.5 36.75 0.8 24 3.00 1.00
26 Plastic 39 1.5 38.25 0.8 27 3.12 1.00
27 Plastic 40.5 1.5 39.75 0.8 21 3.24 1.00
28 Plastic 42 1.5 41.25 0.8 23 3.36 1.00
29 Plastic 43.5 1.5 42.75 0.8 21 3.48 1.00
30 Plastic 45 1.5 44.25 0.8 17 3.60 1.00
31 Plastic 46.5 1.5 66.75 0.8 19 3.72 1.00
32 Plastic 48 1.5 68.25 0.8 17 3.84 1.00
33 Plastic 49.5 1.5 69.75 0.8 18 3.96 1.00
34 Plastic 51 1.5 71.25 0.8 20 4.08 1.00
35 Plastic 52.5 1.5 72.75 0.8 21 4.20 1.00
36 Plastic 54 1.5 74.25 0.8 17 4.32 1.00
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 75.75 0.8 22 4.44 1.00
38 Plastic 57 1.5 77.25 0.8 22 4.56 1.00
39 Plastic 58.5 1.5 78.75 0.8 28 4.68 1.00
40 Plastic 60 1.5 80.25 0.8 32 4.80 1.00
41 Plastic 61.5 1.5 81.75 0.8 40 4.92 1.00
42 Plastic 63 1.5 83.25 0.8 34 5.04 1.00
43 Plastic 64.5 1.5 84.75 0.8 48 5.16 1.00
44 Plastic 66 1.5 86.25 0.8 52 5.28 1.00
45 Plastic 67.5 1.5 87.75 0.8 59 5.40 1.00
46 Plastic 69 1.5 89.25 0.8 52 5.52 1.00
47 Plastic 70.5 1.5 90.75 0.8 55 5.64 1.00
48 Plastic 72 1.5 92.25 0.8 50 5.76 1.00
49 Plastic 73.5 1.5 93.75 0.8 60 5.88 1.00
50 Plastic 75 1.5 95.25 0.8 57 6.00 1.00
51 Plastic 76.5 1.5 96.75 0.8 36 6.12 1.00
52 Plastic 78 1.5 98.25 0.8 35 6.24 1.00
53 Plastic 79.5 1.5 99.75 0.8 33 6.36 1.00
 54 Plastic 81 1.5 101.25 0.8 33 6.48 1.00
55 Plastic 82.5 1.5 102.75 0.8 60 6.60 1.00
56 Plastic 84 1.5 104.25 0.8 67 6.72 1.00
57 Plastic 85.5 1.5 105.75 0.8 51 6.84 1.00
58 Plastic 87 1.5 107.25 0.8 48 6.96 1.00
59 Plastic 88.5 1.5 108.75 0.8 50 7.08 1.00
60 Plastic 90 1.5 110.25 0.8 45 7.20 1.00

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.80 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 7.20 t/m2
(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)
Qb Cb. Nc. Ap
Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line
Qb 286.277631

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1501.01 286.28
(i) Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
Working Capacity of Pile = 832 T
(ii)
Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 715 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 715

Recommended Pile Load 715 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 585 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
on of PAIRA Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ical Load Carrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P26

without steel liner

AD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-05

Final corrected Eff.

Corrected SPT
value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
( N' ) Value (For Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Overburden)
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi Asi
2 2 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.60 7.07
1 1 0 0 0 0 0.00 1.80 7.07
3 3 0 0 1 1 0.00 3.00 7.07
4 4 0 0 2 1 0.00 4.20 7.07
11 11 28 21 0 0 0.40 5.40 7.07
11 11 30 23 0 0 0.40 6.60 7.07
8 8 29 22 0 0 0.30 7.20 7.07
7 7 33 25 0 0 0.30 7.20 7.07
8 8 29 22 0 0 0.30 7.20 7.07
13 13 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
11 11 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
11 11 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
20 17 32 24 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
20 17 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
23 19 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
71 43 36 27 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
15 15 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
12 12 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
17 16 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
18 17 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
12 12 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
11 11 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
16 15 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
22 22 0 0 14 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
24 24 0 0 16 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
27 27 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
21 21 0 0 14 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
23 23 0 0 14 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
21 21 0 0 16 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
17 17 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 7.20 7.07
19 19 0 0 12 0.4 0.00 7.20 7.07
17 17 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 7.20 7.07
18 18 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 7.20 7.07
20 20 0 0 13 0.4 0.00 7.20 7.07
21 21 0 0 14 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
17 17 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
22 22 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
22 22 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
28 28 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
32 32 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
40 40 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
34 34 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
48 48 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
52 52 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
59 59 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
52 52 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
55 55 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
50 50 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
60 60 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
57 57 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
36 36 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
35 35 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
33 33 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
 33 33 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
60 60 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
67 67 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
51 51 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
48 48 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
50 50 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
45 45 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07

Total Friction Σ

6
9

Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
plastic 48 527
plastic 51 548
plastic 55.5 585

uced by a factor of 0.7

 Friction (Tons)

(αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
0.000
0.00
7.069
14.137
15.27
18.66
15.268
15.268
15.268
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.36
20.36
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
32.162
33.929
38.170
32.162
32.16
33.93
31.10
31.38
31.10
31.10
32.16
32.16
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17

1501 T
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the R

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 52 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA B

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.8 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length
Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Z/2 Field SPT
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.75 0.83 2 0.12 1.00

2 Plastic 3 1.5 2.25 0.83 3 0.25 1.00
3 Non Plastic 4.5 1.5 3.75 0.83 3 0.37 1.33
4 Non Plastic 6 1.5 5.25 0.83 4 0.50 1.23
5 Non Plastic 7.5 1.5 6.75 0.83 5 0.62 1.16
6 Non Plastic 9 1.5 8.25 0.83 8 0.75 1.10
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 9.75 0.83 8 0.87 1.05
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 11.25 0.83 10 1.00 1.00
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 12.75 0.83 12 1.12 0.96
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 14.25 0.83 11 1.25 0.93
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 15.75 0.83 12 1.37 0.90
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 17.25 0.83 14 1.49 0.87
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 18.75 0.83 16 1.62 0.84
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 20.25 0.83 17 1.74 0.82
15 Non Plastic 22.5 1.5 21.75 0.83 19 1.87 0.79
16 Non Plastic 24 1.5 23.25 0.83 20 1.99 0.77
17 Plastic 25.5 1.5 24.75 0.83 17 2.12 1.00
18 Plastic 27 1.5 26.25 0.83 16 2.24 1.00
19 Plastic 28.5 1.5 27.75 0.83 18 2.37 1.00
20 Plastic 30 1.5 29.25 0.83 18 2.49 1.00
21 Plastic 31.5 1.5 30.75 0.83 15 2.61 1.00
22 Plastic 33 1.5 32.25 0.83 14 2.74 1.00
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 33.75 0.83 25 2.86 1.00
24 Non Plastic 36 1.5 35.25 0.83 33 2.99 0.64
25 Non Plastic 37.5 1.5 36.75 0.83 25 3.11 0.62
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 38.25 0.83 28 3.24 0.61
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 39.75 0.83 33 3.36 0.60
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 41.25 0.83 34 3.49 0.58
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 42.75 0.83 37 3.61 0.57
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 44.25 0.83 37 3.74 0.56
31 Non Plastic 46.5 1.5 66.75 0.83 30 3.86 0.55
32 Plastic 48 1.5 68.25 0.83 25 3.98 1.00
33 Plastic 49.5 1.5 69.75 0.83 29 4.11 1.00
34 Plastic 51 1.5 71.25 0.83 27 4.23 1.00
35 Plastic 52.5 1.5 72.75 0.83 22 4.36 1.00
36 Plastic 54 1.5 74.25 0.83 17 4.48 1.00
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 75.75 0.83 22 4.61 1.00
38 Plastic 57 1.5 77.25 0.83 22 4.73 1.00
39 Plastic 58.5 1.5 78.75 0.83 28 4.86 1.00
40 Plastic 60 1.5 80.25 0.83 32 4.98 1.00
41 Plastic 61.5 1.5 81.75 0.83 40 5.10 1.00
42 Plastic 63 1.5 83.25 0.83 34 5.23 1.00
43 Plastic 64.5 1.5 84.75 0.83 48 5.35 1.00
44 Plastic 66 1.5 86.25 0.83 52 5.48 1.00
45 Plastic 67.5 1.5 87.75 0.83 59 5.60 1.00
46 Plastic 69 1.5 89.25 0.83 52 5.73 1.00
47 Plastic 70.5 1.5 90.75 0.83 55 5.85 1.00
48 Plastic 72 1.5 92.25 0.83 50 5.98 1.00
49 Plastic 73.5 1.5 93.75 0.83 60 6.10 1.00
50 Plastic 75 1.5 95.25 0.83 57 6.23 1.00
51 Plastic 76.5 1.5 96.75 0.83 36 6.35 1.00
52 Plastic 78 1.5 98.25 0.83 35 6.47 1.00
53 Plastic 79.5 1.5 99.75 0.83 33 6.60 1.00
 54 Plastic 81 1.5 101.25 0.83 33 6.72 1.00
55 Plastic 82.5 1.5 102.75 0.83 60 6.85 1.00

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.80 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 7.20 t/m2
(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)
Qb Cb. Nc. Ap
Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line
Qb 286.277631

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1276.09 286.28
(i) Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
Working Capacity of Pile = 720 T
(ii)
Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 625 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 625

Recommended Pile Load 625 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 509 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
on of PAIRA Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ical Load Carrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P27

without steel liner

AD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-07

Final corrected Eff.

Corrected SPT
value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
( N' ) Value (For Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Overburden)
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi Asi
2 2 0 0 0 0 0.30 0.62 7.07
3 3 0 0 1 1 0.30 1.87 7.07
4 4 28 21 0 0 0.30 3.11 7.07
5 5 29 22 0 0 0.30 4.36 7.07
6 6 29 22 0 0 0.30 5.60 7.07
9 9 29 22 0 0 0.30 6.85 7.07
8 8 29 22 0 0 0.30 7.20 7.07
10 10 27 20 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
12 12 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
10 10 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
11 11 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
12 12 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
13 13 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
14 14 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
15 15 21 16 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
15 15 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
17 17 0 0 11 0 0.00 7.20 7.07
16 16 0 0 14 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
18 18 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 7.20 7.07
18 18 0 0 11 0.4 0.00 7.20 7.07
15 15 0 0 10 0.5 0.00 7.20 7.07
14 14 0 0 9 0.5 0.00 7.20 7.07
25 25 0 0 17 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
21 18 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
16 15 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
17 16 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
20 17 26 20 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
20 17 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
21 18 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
21 18 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
17 16 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
25 25 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
29 29 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
27 27 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
22 22 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
17 17 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
22 22 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
22 22 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
28 28 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
32 32 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
40 40 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
34 34 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
48 48 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
52 52 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
59 59 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
52 52 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
55 55 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
50 50 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
60 60 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
57 57 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
36 36 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
35 35 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
33 33 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
 33 33 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
60 60 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07

Total Friction Σ

6
9

Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
plastic 70.5 471
plastic 73.5 496
plastic 75 509

uced by a factor of 0.7

 Friction (Tons)

(αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
1.320
11.03
6.600
9.240
11.88
14.52
15.268
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
31.10
32.16
31.102
31.102
31.809
31.809
36.050
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.36
20.36
20.36
20.36
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17

530 T
745.59
1276.09
 Project: Construction of PAIRA Bridge over the R

Calculations for Static Vertical Load Carrying Capacity

Proposed Pile Diameter : 1.50 m

Considerations in design:
1. The critical depth has been considered as 8 D. As per Tomlinson, RHD Bridge design

2. The angle of wall friction has been considered as δ = 0.5 Ø throughout the steel/Sand interface and (3/4)Ø throughout the pile length without steel liner

Total Pile length L 52 m As per GAD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA B

Dia of Pile D 1.5 m
Effective Unit weight of soil at Pile Ti γ 0.8 t/m3
Depth of water level 0 m

(1) Resistance Due to Friction :

Total Length
Eff. Unit Eff. Over burden Overburden
Soil Layer Type of soil incl. Scour Depth of Layer Z/2 Field SPT
Wt Pr (Kg/cm2) Correction Factor
depth (m)

1 Plastic 1.5 1.5 0.75 0.8 4 0.12 1.00

2 Plastic 3 1.5 2.25 0.8 9 0.24 1.00
3 Plastic 4.5 1.5 3.75 0.8 5 0.36 1.00
4 Plastic 6 1.5 5.25 0.8 7 0.48 1.00
5 Plastic 7.5 1.5 6.75 0.8 8 0.60 1.00
6 Non Plastic 9 1.5 8.25 0.8 9 0.72 1.11
7 Non Plastic 10.5 1.5 9.75 0.8 9 0.84 1.06
8 Non Plastic 12 1.5 11.25 0.8 10 0.96 1.02
9 Non Plastic 13.5 1.5 12.75 0.8 12 1.08 0.98
10 Non Plastic 15 1.5 14.25 0.8 13 1.20 0.94
11 Non Plastic 16.5 1.5 15.75 0.8 13 1.32 0.91
12 Non Plastic 18 1.5 17.25 0.8 14 1.44 0.88
13 Non Plastic 19.5 1.5 18.75 0.8 17 1.56 0.85
14 Non Plastic 21 1.5 20.25 0.8 18 1.68 0.83
15 Non Plastic 22.5 1.5 21.75 0.8 28 1.80 0.81
16 Non Plastic 24 1.5 23.25 0.8 29 1.92 0.78
17 Non Plastic 25.5 1.5 24.75 0.8 26 2.04 0.76
18 Non Plastic 27 1.5 26.25 0.8 29 2.16 0.74
19 Non Plastic 28.5 1.5 27.75 0.8 33 2.28 0.73
20 Non Plastic 30 1.5 29.25 0.8 36 2.40 0.71
21 Plastic 31.5 1.5 30.75 0.8 30 2.52 1.00
22 Plastic 33 1.5 32.25 0.8 32 2.64 1.00
23 Plastic 34.5 1.5 33.75 0.8 25 2.76 1.00
24 Plastic 36 1.5 35.25 0.8 27 2.88 1.00
25 Plastic 37.5 1.5 36.75 0.8 25 3.00 1.00
26 Non Plastic 39 1.5 38.25 0.8 29 3.12 0.62
27 Non Plastic 40.5 1.5 39.75 0.8 28 3.24 0.61
28 Non Plastic 42 1.5 41.25 0.8 31 3.36 0.60
29 Non Plastic 43.5 1.5 42.75 0.8 30 3.48 0.58
30 Non Plastic 45 1.5 44.25 0.8 37 3.60 0.57
31 Non Plastic 46.5 1.5 66.75 0.8 22 3.72 0.56
32 Non Plastic 48 1.5 68.25 0.8 22 3.84 0.55
33 Non Plastic 49.5 1.5 69.75 0.8 18 3.96 0.54
34 Non Plastic 51 1.5 71.25 0.8 24 4.08 0.53
35 Non Plastic 52.5 1.5 72.75 0.8 21 4.20 0.52
36 Plastic 54 1.5 74.25 0.8 17 4.32 1.00
37 Plastic 55.5 1.5 75.75 0.8 22 4.44 1.00
38 Plastic 57 1.5 77.25 0.8 22 4.56 1.00
39 Plastic 58.5 1.5 78.75 0.8 28 4.68 1.00
40 Plastic 60 1.5 80.25 0.8 32 4.80 1.00
41 Plastic 61.5 1.5 81.75 0.8 40 4.92 1.00
42 Plastic 63 1.5 83.25 0.8 34 5.04 1.00
43 Plastic 64.5 1.5 84.75 0.8 48 5.16 1.00
44 Plastic 66 1.5 86.25 0.8 52 5.28 1.00
45 Plastic 67.5 1.5 87.75 0.8 59 5.40 1.00
46 Plastic 69 1.5 89.25 0.8 52 5.52 1.00
47 Plastic 70.5 1.5 90.75 0.8 55 5.64 1.00
48 Plastic 72 1.5 92.25 0.8 50 5.76 1.00
49 Plastic 73.5 1.5 93.75 0.8 60 5.88 1.00
50 Plastic 75 1.5 95.25 0.8 57 6.00 1.00
51 Plastic 76.5 1.5 96.75 0.8 36 6.12 1.00
52 Plastic 78 1.5 98.25 0.8 35 6.24 1.00
53 Plastic 79.5 1.5 99.75 0.8 33 6.36 1.00
 54 Plastic 81 1.5 101.25 0.8 33 6.48 1.00
55 Plastic 82.5 1.5 102.75 0.8 60 6.60 1.00
56 Plastic 84 1.5 104.25 0.8 67 6.72 1.00
57 Plastic 85.5 1.5 105.75 0.8 51 6.84 1.00
58 Plastic 87 1.5 107.25 0.8 48 6.96 1.00
59 Plastic 88.5 1.5 108.75 0.8 50 7.08 1.00
60 Plastic 90 1.5 110.25 0.8 45 7.20 1.00
61 Plastic 91.5 1.5 111.75 0.8 40 7.32 1.00
62 Plastic 93 1.5 113.25 0.8 42 7.44 1.00

(2) Resistance Due to End Bearing :

Diameter of pile, D 1.5 m

Cross-sec.area of pile toe, Ap = 1.767 m2
Eff. unit wt.of soil at pile toe, g = 0.80 t/m3
Eff. overburden at pile toe, σv = 7.20 t/m2

(2) -Resistance Due to End Bearing : (Cohesive soil)

Qb Cb. Nc. Ap
Where, Nc = 9 as per RHD guide line
Qb 286.277631

(3) Capacity of Pile :

Friction End Bearing

Ultimate Capacity of Pile = 1248.59 286.28
(i) Fcator of Safety = 2 3.5
Working Capacity of Pile = 706 T
(ii)
Working Capacity of Pile for FOS=2.5 = 614 T

Now Working Load Lesser of above two values 614

Recommended Pile Load 614 T

(4) Group Effect:

AASHTO clause 4.6.5.2.4 specifies that the proposed pile spacing of 3x diameter, the shaft capacity should be reduced by a factor of 0.7

Q allowable group 519 T

Reference:
RHD Bridge design hand book
Poulos H. J. and Davis E. H., (1980), "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design"
on of PAIRA Bridge over the River of Paira, Bangladesh

ical Load Carrying Capacity of Bored Cast In-Situ Pile for P28

without steel liner

AD Drawing no. RHD/PAIRA BRIDGE/PF-07

Final corrected Eff.

Corrected SPT
value after δ Cohesion C α overburden pr.
( N' ) Value (For Ø K tanδ Surf. Area (m2)
Dilatancy (t/m2) @ the center
Overburden)
Correction (N'') of ith layer

Pdi Asi
4 4 0 0 2 1 0.00 0.60 7.07
9 9 0 0 5 1 0.30 1.80 7.07
5 5 0 0 3 1 0.00 3.00 7.07
7 7 0 0 4 1 0.00 4.20 7.07
8 8 0 0 4 1 0.00 5.40 7.07
10 10 27 20 0 0 0.40 6.60 7.07
10 10 30 23 0 0 0.30 7.20 7.07
10 10 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
12 12 29 22 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
12 12 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
12 12 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
12 12 30 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
15 15 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
15 15 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
23 19 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
23 19 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
20 17 31 23 0 0 0.40 7.20 7.07
22 18 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
24 19 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
26 20 32 24 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
30 30 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
32 32 0 0 20 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
25 25 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
27 27 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
25 25 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
18 17 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
17 16 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
18 17 33 25 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
18 16 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
21 18 31 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
12 12 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
12 12 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
10 10 30 23 0 0.0 0.30 7.20 7.07
13 13 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
11 11 30 23 0 0.0 0.40 7.20 7.07
17 17 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
22 22 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
22 22 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
28 28 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
32 32 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
40 40 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
34 34 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
48 48 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
52 52 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
59 59 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
52 52 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
55 55 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
50 50 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
60 60 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
57 57 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
36 36 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
35 35 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
33 33 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
 33 33 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
60 60 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
67 67 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
51 51 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
48 48 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
50 50 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
45 45 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
40 40 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07
42 42 0 0 18 0.3 0.00 7.20 7.07

Total Friction Σ

6
9

7.2 t/m2

Group Effect

Pile Length as
Vertical
Soil Types per PMG Div.
Capacity (T)
(m)
plastic 73.5 492
plastic 75 505
plastic 76.5 519
s

uced by a factor of 0.7

 Friction (Tons)

(αxC+KxtanδxPDi)x
Asi
14.137
33.86
21.206
28.274
28.27
18.66
15.268
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.358
20.36
20.36
20.358
20.358
38.170
42.412
38.170
38.170
38.170
20.358
20.358
20.36
20.36
20.36
20.36
20.36
15.27
20.36
20.36
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17
38.17

541 T
707.42
1249 T