APPENDIX E: Rubric to use to complete the peer review of another group’s abstract

You will complete the peer evaluation of another group’s abstract during the week of November 18, 2019.

Your G.T.A. will evaluate the quality of your peer evaluation and it is worth 1% of your grade. He/she will use the rubric in Appendix F to do so.

Names: _Kiran Sandhu and Syeda Rubbia Mahnaz________________________________________________________

Names of peers we are reviewing: _____Tija Brusic and Anneke Swanepole____________________________________________________

Criteria 4 – Excellent 3 – Good 2 – Fair 1 – Area of growth Grade (out

Quality of Sufficient background
hypothesis, information is presented to teach
background me what I need to know about the
information and disease. I know the gene and
justification mutation selected. The hypothesis
is presented and justified in such
a way that it appears sound.
Writing quality Writing is clear, concise and
and organized. There are limited
effectiveness of grammatical and spelling errors.
communication
of 4)
Too much background All I read is mostly The hypothesis is missing!
information is background. They This is mostly a short review.
presented. Although authors state their
the hypothesis is hypothesis, but don’t
presented, I am NOT provide me with any
convinced. There are supporting information. ____ / 4
missing links! I need I cannot endorse it in
to know more before I this condition.
endorse it.
There are some There are many General lack of organization of
grammatical and grammatical and ideas. The grammatical and ____ / 4
spelling errors. A few spelling errors. Parts of spelling errors are very
ideas in the hypothesis the worksheets are distracting.
could be linked in a disorganized, making
better way. reading difficult.