Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1. Section 20
Once incorporated a company becomes a body corporate and
(a) Have a legal personality separate from that of its members (the doctrine of
separate legal entity / the veil of incorporation)
When the company is formed and registered the company will become separate
legal entity. The company and its members are two separate body. The effect of
this is that:
i. Members are not liable for any debts of the company. The company has to settle
its own debts.
ii. The company and its members can enter into contract with each other.
Solomon was a boot and shoe manufacturer. He ran his business as a sole trader.
He then formed a company called Solomon & Co. Ltd. He is the majority
shareholder. Unfortunately his business became insolvent and had to be dissolved.
Issue: Whether Solomon was liable for the company’s debts. Held: Solomon and
the company were two separate entity. Therefore, Solomon was not liable for the
company’s debts.
Lee formed a company Lee’s Air Farming Ltd. He was the company’s sole
governing director. He was also its only pilot. Lee was killed while flying for the
company. His wife made a claim from workman’s compensation. The court allowed
Mrs. Lee’s claim. Lee could enter into contract with the company because he was
the employee of the company.
The company had only two shareholders, a husband and wife. They were the only
directors of the company. Both died in a traffic accident. Only their baby survived.
The court held that although all the directors died, the company still existed. So the
shares in the company were transferred to the baby.
2. Section 21(1)
A company can sue and be sued in its own name. The members may not sue on the
company’s behalf. If a director has breached his duties, it is for the company to take
action and not the members.
Foss v Harbottle
Two shareholders in the Victoria Park Company brought an action against directors
for misapplication of company’s property. The court held that the right person to sue
was the company and not the members of the company (two shareholders).
Macaura owned an estate. He sold all the timber to a company, Irish Canadian
Sawmills Ltd. Macaura insured the timber that he sold to the company in his own
name. Two weeks later the timber was destroyed in a fire. Macaura put a claim but
the insurance company refused to pay. The court held that the timber was the
property of the company. Therefore, Macaura’s claim from the insurance company
failed.