Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Facts At Your Fingertips

Liquid-Liquid Extraction
Department Editor: Scott Jenkins

L
iquid-liquid extraction is a com- where a is the sol- Typical LLE Equilibrium Curve
mon mass-transfer operation ute, ya is the weight 0.09

Extract composition*, wt. fraction solute


in which a target solute mate- fraction (concen- 0.08
rial is transferred from a feed phase tration) of compo- 0.07
into a solvent. The process is used nent a in the extract
0.06
in a number of applications, includ- liquid and xa is the
ing: the removal of valuable products weight fraction of 0.05

from fermentation broth; the removal component a in 0.04


of high-boiling-point organic materi- the raffinate liquid. 0.03
als from wastewater; recovery of hy- If an LLE data set
0.02
drogen-bonded organic compounds is available, and
(formic acid, acetic acid and others) the column ma- 0.01

from water; recovery of reaction prod- terial balance is 0.00


ucts from a broth; washing of acids known, it is pos- 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020
Raffinate composition*, wt. fraction solute
or bases from an organic stream; and sible to determine * On a solute-free basis
others. This one-page reference pro- the number of the-
vides information on how to asses the oretical stages necessary to achieve the solvent (solute-free basis)
performance of a liquid-liquid extrac- a specific separation. m = distribution coefficient
tion column. S/F = mass ratio of solvent rate to
Column evaluation feed rate
Extraction operation To generate LLE data, a “shake test” E = extraction factor [m × (S/F)]
In liquid-liquid extraction, a feed so- can be used. These tests are con-
lution is contacted with a liquid sol- ducted in reactor-type laboratory If the shake test results show a
vent that is immiscible with some of flasks with the capability to allow agi- distribution coefficient that changes
the components of the feed, but that tation and temperature control. Feed significantly with concentration, then
dissolves another component of the solutions containing varying solute a graphical method, such as the Mc-
feed solution. In the course of this concentrations are added to the flask Cabe-Thiele method for determining
contact, a desired material can be along with varying amounts of solvent column efficiency (number of theo-
removed from the feed and trans- (corresponding to the solvent-to-feed retical stages), can be used.
ferred to the solvent phase. The sol- ratio being used in the process). For The column performance and the
vent phase refers to the solvent with each case, the two-phase mixture is Kremser equation can help to evalu-
the dissolved solute, while the feed heated to the desired temperature ate the effects of changes to key
solution without the solute is called and the phases are mixed vigorously process variables. By changing in-
the raffinate phase. before being allowed to separate. dividual input variables, engineers
There are a number of extrac- The two phases are then analyzed can quickly calculate the effect of the
tor types for liquid-liquid extraction, to determine the solute concentra- changes on column performance.
including agitated columns, static tion in each. For the pair of samples Glatz and Parker [1] outlined six
columns, rotating disc contactors in each test, the distribution coeffi- steps to improving a liquid-liquid ex-
and others. In most cases, the two cient is calculated. If the calculated traction process:
phases flow countercurrently, by ex- distribution coefficients are relatively 1. Generate LLE data for the current
ploiting the difference in density of constant, the number of theoretical (existing) process
the two fluids. stages can be calculated using the 2. Obtain the material balance for the
Kremser equation. existing column, including flowrates,
Column performance and solute concentrations for feed,
Liquid-liquid equilibrium (LLE) data extract and raffinate
describe the steady-state partitioning 3. Use the Kremser equation, graphi-
behavior of the solute between the cal solution, or simulation to calculate
two phases. The concentration of the the number of theoretical stages
solute in the extract phase is plotted (2) 4. Evaluate how changes in process
against the concentration of the sol- Where: variables affect column performance
ute in the raffinate phase (see figure). ns = number of theoretical stages 5. Perform pilot testing based on re-
Each point along the curve defines a XF = mass concentration of solute in sults from step 4
local distribution coefficient, m, ac- the feed (solute-free basis) 6. Modify equipment and process
cording to the following equation: XN = mass concentration of solute in based on steps 4 and 5 n
the raffinate (solute-free basis) Editor’s note: This column is adapted from the following ar-
ticle: 1. Glatz, D. and Parker, W., “Enriching Liquid-Liquid
m = ya / xa (1) YS = mass concentration of solute in Extraction,” Chem. Eng., November 2004, pp. 44–48.

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHEMENGONLINE.COM JUNE 2015 33


Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
permission.

Вам также может понравиться