Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
on
HRD Competencies
in
Public and Private sector Units
of
Uttar Pradesh
Submitted in the partial fulfillment of
Masters Degree
in
Human Resource Development
Session 2008-2009
Submitted by Under the expert Guidance of
Department of HRD
VBS Purvanchal University
Jaunpur
1
Declaration
2
To Whom It May Concern
piece of work.
3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This Research work shall not complete unless I do not extend my gratitude
to those who directly or indirectly has been a source of inspiration in the
completion of this work.
Last but not least, this project would be incomplete without extending my
special thanks to all those who helped me in data collection and
presentation of this report.
4
PREFACE
The study was undertaken with specific objectives and to test the hypotheses in
the samples of the HR professionals in the various public and private
sector companies of the Uttar Pradesh. The objective of the report is to
provide clear-cut and understandable Information of HRD competencies in
public and private sector companies of Uttar Pradesh. This study is hoped to
bring out meaningful answers to all the above points and also act as, a
pre-cursor to further studies. Any constructive comments for improving the
contents will be warmly appreciated.
5
CONTENTS
Certificate
Declaration
Acknowledgements
Preface
Page No.
Bibliography i-iii
Annexure 1-3
6
CHAPTER I
1.1 INTRODUCTION
21st century is an era of Competency! It is important for
business goals of the company. This may flow from the business
7
sight of the bigger picture. Do not penalize a person who does not
enable retention.
8
all people initiatives can be built to drive business imperatives
how best to use those talents within the context of the corporate
And finally has put down his conclusion regarding the study
9
1.2 IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY
10
Resources'. HR policies and Practices should create
professionals.
11
various Public and Private sector organizations in Uttar
Pradesh.
12
amongst the different age group, designation and the
1.4 METHODOLOGY
1.4.1 POPULATION
For conducting this study, 62 samples has been taken out from
13
Namely-: Public Sectors units are covered; NTPC- Tanda.
the information and the end result would be utilized only for
14
carry out his research, which is made by Prof. T.V. Rao and
1.4.3.1.1 QUESTIONNAIRE
scale.
15
1.4.4 SECONDARY DATA
1.5 HAYPOTHESES
16
6. Personal attitude and values will be increased with
sector.
knowledge.
values.
17
1.6 STATISTICAL TREATMENT OF THE DATA
• Mean calculation
• Percentage analysis
• Correlation
• T- test
within and out side India. In India, most of the studies are
18
level differ individual-to-individual. A more coherent,
competencies is needed.
The study was hoped to bring out the factors that have
professionals.
1.8 LIMITATIONS
19
HR professionals were assured of confidentiality and were
professionals.
five chapters.
the study,
competencies.
Dissertation Report.
20
Chapter-V Deals with the suggestions.
CHAPTER II
2.1 INTRODUCTION
21
and conceptual knowledge, attitudes and skills) using their
another level it might mean ability to inspire and carry along the
22
across the world. His classic books on "Talent and Society",
23
competencies of entrepreneurs and managers across the
center was in integral part of the HRD plan given to L&T by the
24
required by a given role or set of roles or levels of roles.
competencies.
OF HRD MANAGER
25
educational qualification should he have? Should he come line
one wlxa is, 3& ^HHi&V, mffctts other people, has faith in the
work with people. Most often the HRD manager has to listen to
losing his own faith and positivism and at the same time
inspire others.
26
He should be a person who is constantly looking for learning
27
2.3.1.5 PRACTICE AND PERSEVERANCE
to passivity.
28
employee with respect and self-confidence. Emerging from this
incidents.
MANAGER.
29
rewards, promotions, subjectivity in appraisals,
30
organization.
31
perseverance required to implement such system and the
mechanisms.
32
Ability to design and coordinate training programme for
develop systems.
development.
33
Implementation skills.
Leadership abilities.
holders and other role set members of the role (those who
have expectations from the role holder and who interact with h
him/her)
34
There are full time masters programs and various other short-
professionals.
35
report other internal and external customers.
CHAPTER III
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Collection of data gives information and application of this
information collected to the situation gives the knowledge and
better understanding. To understand the HRD Competencies,
this chapter thoroughly analyses the independent and
dependent variables with the influence they have on each
other. For critical analysis of the data statistical tool like
mean, standard deviation (SD), t- test. F-test, and correlation
36
were used. Computer software Statistical Package for Social
Sciences (SPSS) was used to calculate and compute the data.
For data collection variables were divided in two categories,
independent variables and dependent variables. Independent
variables are age, designation and service experience.
Dependent variables include HRD professional knowledge,
HRD professional skills and Personal Attitude and Values.
Total numbers of items are seventy. The analysis and
outcomes is discussed below in this chapter.
3.2 MEAN, SD, RANGE OF SCORES OF DEPENDENT
VARIABLES
From the table 3.1 above we find that the mean value of Public
sector and Private sector show disagreement on HRD professional
knowledge of executives carrying the mean value of 91.161 and
73.935 for public and private sector respectively in the range of
score 00 to 120. The other variable show about HRD professional
skills in both the sectors. Mean value of HRD professional skills in
public sector is 61.709 while in private sector it is 50.258 in the
range of score 00 to 80. The other variable tells about the
Personal attitude and values in both public and private sector.
The mean value of Personal attitude and values in public sector is
64.354 while in the private sector it is 55.032 in the range of score
00 to 80.
37
HRD professional
knowledge 91.161 19.033 00-120 73.935 16.225 00-120
HRD
61.709 12.633 00-80 50.258 11.375 00-80
professional skills
Personal Attitude
64.354 11.379 00-80 55.032 10.606 00-80
and Values
TABLE: 3.2
38
two groups shows that there is significance difference in the
opinion in this variable. Further it also can be concluded from
the mean value 61.709 and
50.258 of public and private sector respectively that public
sector executives are more competent then private on this
variable.
t- value 3.337 (at 0.01 level of significance) about personal
attitude and value variable between the two group shows that
there is also significant difference between them. Further it also
can be concluded from the mean value 64.354 and 55.032 of
public and private sector respectively that again public sector
executive have more positive attitude and values than private
executives.
TABLE: 3.3
39
3.4.2 F-VALUES OF DEPENDENT VARIABLES AMONGST
DIFFERENT LEVEL OF EXPERIENCE
TABLE: 3.4
TABLE: 3.6
40
Personal
HRD HRD
Attitude
Variables Age Designation Experience Professional Profession
And
Knowledge al Skills
Values
Age 1 -0.554** 0.882** 0.274* 0.246* 0.140
Designation - 1 -0.415** -0.230** -0.287** -0.159
Experience - 1 0.131 0.092 0.022
HRD
Professional - - - 1 0.908** 0.838**
Knowledge
HRD
Professional - - - - 1 0.847**
Skills
Personal
- - - - - 1
Attitude
* p<0.05
** p<0.01
The given table 3.5.1 shows intra and inter dependent correlation
between the independent and dependent variables. The correlation
value 0.882 between age of respondents and service experience
is significant at 0.01 level. Further the relation is positive
indicating as age increases sendee experience also increases.
Similarly, the r - value of-0.554 at 0.01 between age and
designation. Means as age is increasing the designation is also
increasing.
41
with the r-value -0.287 at 0.05 level of significance rest two
variables do not have any correlation with designation.
No Hypotheses Result
42
H03 Personal attitude and values will be increased With the Rejected
executives reaching higher grades.
H03 HRD professional knowledge will be increased With Rejected
executives getting more experience
H05 HRD professional skills will be increased With executives Rejected
getting more experience
H06 Personal attitude and values will be increased With Rejected
executives getting more experience
H07 HRD professional knowledge will be increased With Rejected
executives reaching higher age.
H08 HRD professional skills will be increased With Rejected
executives reaching higher age.
H09 Personal attitude and values will be increased With Rejected
executives reaching higher age.
H10 Higher competencies will be result in Significant Accepted
difference between the executives of public and
H11 private
There issector.
no significant difference between public Rejected
and private sector executives on HRD professional
knowledge
H12 There is no significant difference between public Rejected
and private sector executives on HRD professional
skills. is no significant difference between public
H13 There Rejected
and private sector executives on Personal attitude and
values.
CHAPTER IV
43
competencies in various Public and Private sectors of
Uttar Pradesh and further analyzed it the researcher
recommended some points in the form of suggestions for
increasing the HRD competencies. The methodology for the
project report included questionnaire method and further
information related with the topic was collected from several
journals, books, magazines and Internet. Population for the
research study was all the HR professionals from the senior,
middle and junior levels including male anc female and 62
respondent were taken out into consideration. For analyses of
data several statistical treatment has used like, t- test, F- test,
mean, correlation.
44
competitive business challenges in the areas of conceptual
"knowledge, capabilities, va\ue proportion. \\^ ^XSN'^TKHtRt.
technologies and career paths. This is up to level of
competency of the HR professional that which type he copes
up \\ ith such challenges.
45
needed more development in both sectors. The F-value 3.953
(at 0.05 level of significance) gives an idea that as the
designation levels of the executives will increases the HRD
professional skills of the executive will vary.
46
increasing HRD professional skills may lead to personal
attitude and skill development.
CHAPTER V
5.1 SUGGESTIONS
After reaching to the conclusion given in the previous chapter
the researcher is recommending some points in the form of
suggestions which can be helpful to increase the HRD
competencies. The suggestions are:
47
Personal attitude and values of the private sector
executives should be reinforced through more
training and developmental activities, as it is clear
from the t- value 3.337 (at .01 level of significance)
which means in private and public sector executives
differ Personal attitude and values. Further the
mean value 64.354 and 55.032 'of public and private
sector respectively depicts that private sector
executives have low competency in comparison to
public sector executives.
48
BIBLIOGRAPHY
• Armstrong Michael, ‘A Hand Book of Human Resource
Management', 9 th edition. 2004, kogan page publication. London.
• Johree Raj an, Jain Mugtha, "Meta competencies: wake up the giant
and the genius", Human Capital,, vol. 6, no.6, November. 2002,
pg.no.28, New Delhi.
• McConkey Richard, ‘Who’s Perfect for HR", Human Capital, vol.
7, no. June 2003, pg.no.30, New Delhi.
• Parveen Nikhat, "Smart Enough for IT". Human Capital, vol. 5. no.
10. March 2002, pg.no.56, New Delhi.
49
1996. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing, New Delhi.
• www.google.com
• www.yahoo.com
50
Annexure
Respected, Sir/ Madam, .|
I am ___________________, student of MHRD IV Sem, Department of HRD, VBS
Purvanchal University, Jaunpur (UP). I am conducting a research towards the fulfillment
of Masters Degree in Human Resource Development. This study is purely for the
academic purpose and information given shall be kept confidential and be used in the
form of statistics only. Therefore you are requested to give your frank opinion / comment.
Part. I
Name (Optional)
Designation level: - Senior/Middle/Junior level
Department
Address of the organization (Please mention phone number)
Age:___________. Gender___________.
Qualification ____________
Working Experience in Years. ____________
Part-II
SN Questions Response
1 Knowledge of HRD philosophy, policies, practices and 0 1 2 3 4
systems.
2 Knowledge of performance appraisal systems and 0 1 2 3 4
practices.
3 Knowledge of potential appraisals in theory and 0 1 2 3 4
practices
4 r Knowledge of career planning and development 0 1 2 3 4
systems and practice.
5 Knowledge of organizational diagnosis interventions. 0 1 2 3 4
6 Knowledge of learning theories. 0 1 2 3 4
7 Knowledge of training methods and systems. 0 1 2 3 4
8 Knowledge of organizations, how they are structured 0 1 2 3 4
and how they function. 0 1 2 3 4
9 Knowledge of group dynamics and group functioning. 0 1 2 3 4
10 Knowledge of inter- linkages between organizational Goals, plans, policies, 0 1 2 3 4
strategies, structure, technology
51
Systems, people management systems, styles etc.
11 Knowledge of power dynamics, networks in the organization. 0 1 2 3 4
12 Knowledge of organizational plan, manpower and competency requirements. 0 1 2 3 4
13 Knowledge of social science research methods 0 1 2 3 4
14 Knowledge of job analysis, job enrichment, job-Redesign and job-evaluation. 0 1 2 3 4
15 Knowledge of manpower planning methods 0 1 2 3 4
16 Knowledge of role analysis techniques 0 1 2 3 4
17 Knowledge employee relations practices 0 1 2 3 4
18 Knowledge of the role of rewards 0 1 2 3 4
19 Knowledge of behavior modification and Attitude change methods. 0 1 2 3 4
20 Knowledge of quality circles. 0 1 2 3 4
21 Knowledge of recent developments in management Systems. 0 1 2 3 4
22 Knowledge of personality theories and measurement. 0 1 2 3 4
23 Understanding of personal and managerial effectiveness. 0 1 2 3 4
24 Knowledge of interpersonal relations and factors affecting them. 0 1 2 3 4
25 Knowledge of what constitutes organizational health and Methods of surveying. 0 1 2 3 4
26 Knowledge of instruments and methods of measure human behavior. 0 1 2 3 4
27 Knowledge of personal growth and its methods. 0 1 2 3 4
28 Knowledge of turn-around strategies. 0 1 2 3 4
29 Knowledge of creativity and problem-solving techniques. 0 1 2 3 4
30 Knowledge of conflict management strategies and techniques. 0 1 2 3 4
31 Influencing (communication, persuasive, assertive, inspirational And such other 0 1 2 3 4
skills needed to influence) top management.
32 Influencing skills for influencing line managers. 0 1 2 3 4
33 Articulating HRD philosophy and values. 0 1 2 3 4
34 Designing skills for designing HRD systems. 0 1 2 3 4
35 Communication skills-written (ability to communicate views, Opinions, 0 1 2 3 4
observations, suggestions etc clearly to make an impact).
36 Communication skills- oral. 0 1 2 3 4
37 Skills to monitor the implementation of HRD systems (designing Questionnaires, 0 1 2 3 4
data gathering, feedback
and persuasion).
38 Interpersonal sensitivity. 0 1 2 3 4
39 Ability to give and receive feedback. 0 1 2 3 4
40 Counseling skills (listening, rapport building, probing and exploring). 0 1 2 3 4
41 Conflict management skills. 0 1 2 3 4
42 Ability to inspire others by arousing their values and super ordinate goals. 0 1 2 3 4
43 Interpersonal communication skills. 0 1 2 3 4
44 Leadership and initiative. 0 1 2 3 4
45 Creativity (ability to come up with new ideas and alternative). 0 1 2 3 4
46 Problem solving skills (ability to diagnose problems and come up with various 0 1 2 3 4
alternatives).
47 System designing skills (to design human resource information systems, 0 1 2 3 4
appraisal systems, manpower inventory etc).
48 Task analysis/Job analysis skills. 0 1 2 3 4
49 Organization diagnosis skills. 0 1 2 3 4
50 Process observation and process sensitivity skills. 0 1 2 3 4
51 Empathy and understanding. 0 1 2 3 4
52 Positive and helpful attitude to others. 0 1 2 3 4
53 Faith in people and their competencies. 0 1 2 3 4
52
54 Introspective attitude (a tendency to reflect about one's own self, strengths and 0 1 2 3 4
weaknesses).
55 Openness (open to other's suggestion and likes to be open in expressing his own 0 1 2 3 4
views).
56 Interpersonal trust. 0 1 2 3 4
57 Pro -activity. 0 1 2 3 4
58 Respect for others. 0 1 2 3 4
59 Self-confidence and faith in ones own competencies. 0 1 2 3 4
60 Sense of responsibility. 0 1 2 3 4
61 Sense of fairness (constant desire for objectivity and not being impressionistic). 0 1 2 3 4
62 Self discipline (a desire to set example). 0 1 2 3 4
63 Honesty (a desire to be sincere and honest). 0 1 2 3 4
64 Willingness to experiment. 0 1 2 3 4
65 Learning orientation- a tendency to treat every experience as a learning 0 1 2 3 4
opportunity.
66 Perseverance (not giving up easily in the event of difficulties). 0 1 2 3 4
67 Work motivation (a desire to be involved and work hard for the organization). 0 1 2 3 4
68 Super ordination (an attitude that he is working for 0 1 2 3 4
larger goals). l
69 Empowering attitude (a tendency to respect others and willingness to empower 0 1 2 3 4
them not being over concerned about his personal power base).
70 Stress tolerance (ability to cope with stress, frustration, hostility and suspicion). 0 1 2 3 4
Thanking You,
Regards,
53