Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 24

Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Tie Risk

Analysis for the new comers to Major


Accident Hazard Industries
Shailesh Purohit: CMIOSH/ AMIChemE
Process Safety Engineer CLH Pipeline System Limited
Acknowledgments

• I wish to thank CLH-PS Limited for permitting me to conduct this


workshop.
• I with to thank Risktec and CGE for their permission to use some of their
training materials. Further information is available from their websites:
• http://www.risktec.co.uk/
• http://www.cgerisk.com/
• Last but not the least, I wish to thank the Hazardous Industries Group
(HIG)Committee and IOSH Staff for their help and guidance in presenting
this BowTie workshop.

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 2
Who are we?

• CLH Pipeline System (CLH-PS) Ltd is an oil product logistics


company wholly owned by CLH that carries out its activities in the
United Kingdom.
• CLH-PS provides its services to several military facilities and some
of the main airports in the United Kingdom. It is the main fuel
pipeline and storage facility network in that country.
• Its infrastructures consist of a pipeline network of 2,000
kilometres, which represents 50% of the British pipeline network,
and 14 storage facilities with a total capacity of over one million
cubic metres.
• CLH-PS supplies 35% of the demand for aviation fuel in the United
Kingdom. Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted and Manchester are
among the main airports it supplies, in addition to other 10
regional airports that are supplied by road tanker.
• CLH Pipeline System is currently carrying out a major
modernisation programme in its infrastructures with the aim of
improving safety and efficiency and reducing costs.

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 3
Introduction

• This presentation is to provide a brief overview of a “Bow Tie” Method”


of Analysis of HSE Risks for your Organisation for threats that may lead
to loss in terms of major accidents occurring.
• It is your expertise that will drive the workshop and achieve the goal of
identifying risks and coming up with potential ways of minimising or
even eliminating these risks.
• So…. let this not be a death by power point presentation but a lively
interactive session with lots of interruptions and fun 

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 4
Outguess me

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 5
160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 6
160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 7
160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 8
160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 9
Some definitions/ terms that will be used

• What is a Hazard?
• Top Event?
• Threats?
• Consequences?
• Barriers (Controls)
• Escalation Factors

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 10
11
160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties
Hazard

• Hazards are shown as per the


figure in the right hand side in a
Yellow/ Black Box
• An example for this BowTie
Workshop is “Product Storage”

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 12
Top Event

• Release of a “Hazard” leads to a


“Top Event” which is usually a loss
of control event.
• For your BowTie, it is shown in the
right hand side in a Red/ Yellow/
Orange Circle

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 13
Threats

• Typical HSE Threats are:


 Internal Corrosion
 Overfilling
 Lack of Maintenance
 Asset Impact by vehicles
 And so on….
 These are shown on the BowTie
within Blue Border boxes

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 14
Controls or Barriers

• Controls or Barriers are designed to neutralise the “Threats” and stop


the Top Event (Loss of control) leading to a Consequence.
• Barriers may be colour coded (for example “green” for good/ effective
control that does not rely on procedures alone) as shown in next slide

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 15
Barrier (Control) Effectiveness
Control (Barrier) Effectiveness Key
Effectiveness Is it used? Does it work/ is it effective/ human Bow Tie Control
Is it in place? dependency? Colour

Controls is very likely to work when required,


Good Always
little human involvement

Control is likely to work when required, active


OK Mainly
human involvement

Control is either non-existent or has a low


chance of working when required, continuous
Poor Rarely
human involvement, very complex. Actions are
raised for all barriers where effectiveness is poor

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 16
Escalation Factors: Shown inside Yellow Box

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 17
Consequences

• Examples of a consequence of the


Hazard being related due to loss of
control could be:
 Pollution
 Fire
 Prosecution by Competent Authority
 Serious Injury
• Consequences are shown inside
Red Boxes

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 18
Summary: A Completed Bow Tie looks like this

QUESTIONS?
160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 19
Warm Up Exercise for the Bow Tie Workshop – 5 minutes to set the scene
Car Journey from home to work

• Consider a car journey from home to work


• Here the hazard is “driving”
• Top Event is losing control of your car whilst driving
• Threats can be listed as………
• Consequences can be listed as ……..
• What are your risk control barriers on each side – preventive and
mitigatory? ...............
• Are there any escalation factors?

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 20
Case Study/ 1
Hypothetical Site Description
1. The site is a Liquid Chemicals bulk storage and blending facility located by the side of a major Estuary
and has a series of 2 x 4 above ground Mild steel tanks within 2 separate concrete bunds. Each tank has
a working capacity of 5000 M3 and the bunds are adequately sized to EA Containment Policy Score Card
guidance. The chemicals are compatible and will not react if mixed accidentally in both the bunds.
2. Bulk chemicals are supplied and stored in these tanks via road tankers from the Humber Terminal and
have a flashpoint of 30 C ( ) and are environmentally toxic ( ). These would cause severe
pollution if released to the waters. They are not toxic or corrosive according to the CLP Classification
criteria. These properties bring the site into the scope of COMAH 2015 as an Upper Tier installation.
3. Site drains are split into surface drains which go to the estuary via an interceptor and foul drains which
go to the on-site sewage treatment plant and then into Water Authority sewers under a consent to
discharge permit.
4. There is no fire fighting provision on the bulk tanks or the bunds and the site relies on Fire Rescue
Service attendance. Site operates from 6 AM to 10 PM in two shift patterns Monday to Friday and no on
site security presence. There is CCTV monitoring by external Party who would call out On Call Duty
Manager.

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 21
Case Study/ 2
Bow Tie Construction Steps

• Various steps in conducting the Bow Tie analysis are:


1. Identify the hazard, top event, threats, barriers (controls) and
consequences. (It is suggested that storage of bulk hazardous chemicals
is the hazard to consider for this case study.
2. Secondly, loss of containment is the Top Event for this study.
3. Threats & consequences are identified in the next slide. What you have
to discuss amongst your groups are the possible preventive barriers &
escalation factors for prevention on the LHS and the recovery or
mitigatory barriers & escalation factors on the RHS

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 22
Case Study/3
Threats & Consequences to consider
• Threats
1. Internal corrosion
2. Overfilling
3. Lack of Maintenance
4. Asset Impact by site vehicle
• Consequences
1. Major Accident to the Environment (MATTE)
2. Reputation loss and/ or Regulatory action
3. Claims/ increase in insurance costs
4. Serious accident to person(s)

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 23
Completed Bow Tie (After the workshop)

This will be sent out to all attendees after the event based
on the workshop findings.

160429 Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties r0.pptx Hitchhiker's Guide to Bow Ties 24

Вам также может понравиться