For. ACKNOWLEDGHENT Our Ref: SO48/001/1, RETURN ‘Thursday, November 28, 2019 Hon. Mike Mbuvi The Governor Nairobi City County NAIROBI Dear Sir, RE: DEFAMATORY POSTS - HON, JOHNSON SAKAJA. We write to you on instructions of our client, Hon, Johnson Sakaja the Senator for Naitobi County to address you as hereunder. ‘On 22 Navember 2019 on your Facebook page, Twitter page and Instagram page, you published defamatory posts of and concerning our elient under the title, ‘OUR BELOVED NAIROBI MPS RECEIVED 250, 000 FROM THE LANDGRABER THROUGH THE OUSTED LEADER OF IMPUNITY AND — CORRUPTION WHO IS. ALSO THE MATOPENT MCA’ In your posts you published the following defamatory werds of and concerning our client:- T can confirm to you the statement read by Senator Johnson Sakaia was 2 copy paste of what Abdi Guyo had alleged at Radio Citizen and KTN to unleash and was not written by Sakaja bue was delivered by Guyo to Alladwa, The question to ask is, what changed between Thursday 14” November 2019 and ‘Thursday 2i* November 2019 for Sakae to change his une from supporting @ statement that wae sought in seaate by Senator Kabaka trom Machackos.on the land grabbing of the South C public children’s playground by a.nortorious grabber. The senator also queried the 2 consents entered by EACC ta allow the grabber continue with the construction of the maif on a public land. The statement was also supported by Senator Achile Ayako of Migort on the Hloor of the Sonate, Well, what changed is chat Sakaja received Kesh. 1.5 Million from the ksh. 5 Million collected by Alacwa fom Guyo, Aladwa kept Ksh. 15 Million for himself However, when they came to the MPs, Aladwa and Sakaje lied to the Mps that they had received only 2M from Gayo and shared with the MPs Ksh, 250,000.cach (for 7 MPs) and Stkaja alsa took another Keb. 250,000." Further in the said posts on the fifth paragraph, you wrote and published the following defamatory words of and concerning our client:- Page| 1‘Needless to say, reliable sources have intimated that the matopent Mca received Ash. 10 Million trom che Lend Grabber but only delivered Koh. 5 Million and kept the vest for himself just like Saksja and Aladwa kepe Ksh, 3 Million between the 2 of them." Our instructions are that the said words, in their ordinary and natural meaning, or by necessary: implication and/or innueide, meant or were tunderstood to mean that:= {) Qurelient is corrupe: 4i) Our client is a fraudster, §ii) Our client is unfit to hold public office. Our further instructions are that the publication of the defamatory posts on your Facebook page, ‘Twitter page and Instagram page, was actuated by malice, ill will, utter recklessness and calculated to cause and has indeed caused our client to be ridiculed and ‘treated with contempt and disdain. Your publication has caused our client great distress and irreparably damaged his hard-earned reputation as a respected political leader, 2 member of the Senate and a role madel to many. ur instructions are that you published the false and defamatory posts with the full knowledge that the allegations were false. The defamatory posts have been widely read on your Facebook page which has a following of 1,921,600 people, Twitter page which has s following of 845,200 people and Instagram page which has a following of°525,000 people. Our instructions ate therefore to demand from you the following, which we hereby do; i) A setraction and apology to be published forthwith and to be given the same prominence as the defamatory posts on your Facebook page, Twitter page and Instagram page: ii) An admission of liability; iii) On fulfilment of (2) and (b) above we shall then delve into the issue of the compensation due to our client, PLEASE NOTE thet if an appropriate retraction and apology is not published on your Facebook Page, Twitter page and Instagram page within the next Forty-Eight (48) hours with the same ‘prominence as the offending and defamatory posts, we have firm instructions to proceed to the Jaw for redress, Yours faithfully, 1 Page | 2