Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
and Benigno Aquino III, oversaw a decade of sustained macroeconomic reform, anchored by
fiscal tightening, moderate inflation, expanding trade surplus and steady economic growth.
Yet, the cost of their disciplinary economic policies was lack of sufficient investment in basic
concern. Both the Arroyo and Aquino administrations were also overly dependent on private-
competencies. Before Rodrigo Duterte assumed the presidency of the country, infrastructure
expenditures in the Philippines had largely been below 5% in relation to the country’s gross
domestic product (GDP), as seen in Table 1. In 2008, in its Policy Brief, the Senate Economic
Planning Office cited the recommendation of the World Bank for the Philippines to invest at
least 3 to 5percent of GDP in infrastructure. Despite this, the trend for infrastructure under
spending continued.
versus Aquino versus Duterte’s Infrastructure policies and determine which of the three
presidents of the Philippines has the most Infrastructure growth during and after their term, Is
Duterte’s “Build, Build, Build” Program better than the previous administration’s
infrastructure policy? How does its quality be compared to other foreign countries, and what
In this research, the researcher used Deductive reasoning to determine the conclusion
of the research through collected data from previous administration infrastructure policies,
determining the GDP of their administration during the year, and compared its GDP by
determining when the economic growth went up or down. The researcher also determines the
potentiality of the current president’s “Build, Build, Build” (BBB) Program to the economy
of our country and looking ahead the promises and risks in achieving it.
Content
GDP)
On a per-year basis, Table 2 presents government spending on infrastructure, for the years
2011 to 2016.
Table 2: Government infrastructure spending (% of GDP), 2011-2016
Sources: National Economic and Development Authority (2017); Department of Budget and Management
(2016)
Competitiveness Index, the Philippines lags behind its ASEAN neighbours in terms of
infrastructure quality, Therefore, it is not only the quantity of infrastructure in the Philippines
The Philippines has the distinction of being the lowest among ASEAN countries in the report
in terms of the quality of overall infrastructure, ranking 113 out of 137 for 2017-2018. Even
worse is the fall in the rankings from being ranked 98 out of 133 in 2009-2010.
Interestingly, while data from the Senate Economic Planning Office (2006) and from
Navarro and Llanto (2014) reveal that transportation has accounted for more than half of the
Infrastructure spending at 52 % for the years 2006 to 2010 and at 58% for the period 2011 to
2016, the country still lags in this category compared to the other ASEAN countries.
Ports and roads have been persistently congested while the MRT and LRT facilities in the
National Capital Region have become increasingly overcrowded and interrupted as a result of
mechanical breakdowns. The result is increased travel time and detrimental effects on both
the economy as well as the credibility of the government (Department of Budget and
Management, 2016a). In fact, the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the
National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) claimed that the cost of traffic
than P2.4 billion every day in Metro Manila alone in 2014 (Bino and Dacanay, 2018).
main regions comprised of more than 7,000 islands poses a challenge (Board of Investments,
When good transportation facilities are in place, it would be easier and more
convenient for producers to interact with consumers of products and ideas, as well as to
promote tourism.
The Department of Budget and Management (2016a) identified the six main
(1) Lack of planning that would influence the absorptive capacities of the agencies
(4) Existence of informal settlers along with the needed investment meant for their
The BBB program was not one of the campaign promises of Duterte. By his own
admission, this was an after-thought, when he was definite of winning the presidency. He
P8-trillion Infrastructure.
Table 4 shows the big-ticket/flagship projects under the “Build, Build, Build” program.
End of
Implementation
Cebu - Bohol Link Construction of a 24.5-km bridge that will link 2021-2030
and Cebu.
economy.
Samar Bridge.
Expressway East, which consists of Phase I and Phase II, and will
Bohol Northeast Basin Envisioned Project components include: two (2) 2019-2023
Facilities.
Provinces Link
Bridges)
Expressway Project Davao City proper connecting the Sta. Ana Port
profitability.
MRP-1.
Negros (PGN) Island crossing bridges that will link panay Island to
length of 30.50 km
is intended to boost business and economic activities in the countryside, thereby helping to
raise millions of Filipinos out of widespread poverty (Fenol & Fuentes, 2018).
Specifically, the objectives of the BBB program include creating (1) more railways,
urban mass transport, airports, and seaports; (2) more bridges and roads; and new and better
cities (Philippine Infrastructure Transparency Portal, n.d.) under the supervision of the
National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA), the Department of Public Works
and Highways (DPWH), the Department of Transportation (DOTr), and the Bases
economic progress. Magnier (2015) mentioned that there is little doubt about the large and
sustained economic benefits that spending on physical infrastructure can bring, provided they
are “focused, cost-effective and either relieve bottlenecks or exploit vast new markets.”
(2015), however, believes that the benefits are not automatic, saying “when you flip the
Infrastructure switch, the light doesn’t necessarily turn on.” In his study, Warner (2014) did
not find strong evidence supporting the proposition that infrastructure projects spark
economic booms, even using the case of the Philippines during the Marcos years as a case
Magnier (2015) also mentioned that some economists are also questioning “whether the
link is so clear, given that “in the real world, where bloat, corruption and politics—not
And, that is where the Achilles heel of the Philippines lays—corruption and politics.
The national budget for 2019 was delayed because of what can only be presumed as political
horse trading among the legislators, based on historical experience, regarding allocations for
infrastructure projects. Members of the appropriations committee traded accusations with the
budget secretary, with the leadership of the House of Representatives, and even among
themselves about illicit budgetary transactions, thus, prolonging the budget process.
Of course, there is still that lingering public perception about the magnitude of graft and
every level of the bureaucracy, causing the project costs to be outrageously overpriced, or the
infrastructure spending in the Philippines, if only to recover from previous years’ under
spending. But, rather than just spending more on infrastructure, the government should have
also paid very close attention that the projects are well chosen and are addressing real and
urgent needs. Risk-benefit analyses that are vetted by independent experts from civil society
Angara, E. (2017, September 19). ‘Build, Build, Build’ program has faulty underlying
assumptions. Business Mirror. Retrieved from https://businessmirror.com.ph/build-buildbuild-
program-has-faulty-underlying-assumptions/
Bino, J. T. & Dacanay, A. E. (2018, January 8). Does Build, Build, Build translate to Win, Win,
Win for the Philippine economy? Business World. Retrieved from
https://www.bworldonline.com/build-build-build-translate-win-win-win-philippineeconomy/
Board of Investments. (2018). Philippine infrastructure sector. Retrieved from
http://boi.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Infrastructure-January-2018.pdf
Camilon, V. C. (2018, January 25). ‘Build, build, build’ and the working poor. Inquirer.net.
Retrieved from https://opinion.inquirer.net/110534/build-build-build-working-poor
Chan, T. F. (2018, March 6). China’s debt-trap diplomacy reaches the Philippines, which is likely
to accept Chinese loans 1,100% more expensive than other options. Business Insider.
Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/chinas-debt-trap-diplomacy-hitsphilippines-
with-exorbitant-loans-2018-3
Chatterjee, S. & Nangoy, F. (2018, October 11). ‘Build, build, build’ may bring decade of 7
percent growth: Diokno. ABS-CBN News. Retrieved from https://news.abscbn.
com/business/10/11/18/build-build-build-may-bring-decade-of-7-percent-growthdiokno
CNN Philippines. (2018, November 26). ‘Upward trend’ in Chinese workers in PH - Labor
department. CNN Philippines. Retrieved from
http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2018/11/26/Chinese-nationals-working-Philippines.html
Delavin, I. C. (2017, June 29). S. Korean firms awarded Panguil Bay bridge consultancy deal.
BusinessWorld Online. Retrieved from
www.bworldonline.com/content.php?section=Economy&title=s.-korean-firms-awardedpanguil-
bay-bridge-consultancy-deal&id=147481
Department of Finance. (2018a). Mindanao among biggest beneficiaries of ‘Build, Build, Build’.
Retrieved from https://www.dof.gov.ph/index.php/mindanao-among-biggestbeneficiaries-
of-build-build-build/
Department of Finance. (2018b). The comprehensive tax reform program package one: Tax
reform for acceleration and inclusion (TRAIN). Retrieved from
http://www.dof.gov.ph/taxreform/?wpdmdl=2602
Department of Public Works and Highways. (2017). DPWH starts P1.6B BGC-Ortigas center
link road project. Retrieved from www.dpwh.gov.ph/dpwh/news/11889
Department of Transportation. (2017). Dutertenomics: DOTr’s priority infrastructure projects.
Retrieved from http://www.dof.gov.ph/taxreform/?wpdmdl=1060
Diokno, B. E. (2018). TRAIN: Driving the Philippine economy in 2018 [Transcript]. Retrieved
from https://www.dbm.gov.ph/index.php/secretary-s-corner/speeches/list-ofspeeches/
689-train-driving-the-philippine-economy-in-2018
Esther (2019, January 12). China to take over Uganda’s main assets over unpaid rising huge
debt. Africanstand. Retrieved from https://www.africanstand.com/news/africa/eastafrica/
china-to-take-over-ugandas-main-assets-over-unpaid-rising-hugedebt/?
fbclid=IwAR0h_WZXWNPTqjI5bcGfaMCey7ylv87s4DCaDmbXS5-
ibAdGJQ7A_z7ROu4
Fenol, J. & Fuentes, A. (2018, January 4). Cost of TRAIN: Will softdrink, fuel taxes offset higher
take-home pay? ABS-CBN News. Retrieved from http://news.abscbn.
com/business/01/04/18/cost-of-train-will-softdrink-fuel-taxes-offset-higher-takehome-
pay
Franco, R. (2017, September 8). Not enough warm bodies for Build! Build! Build! program.
http://www.neda.gov.ph/infrastructure-flagship-projects/