MABALACAT CITY COLLEGE

Dolores, Mabalacat City, Pampanga

Institute of Arts and Sciences

MATHEMATICS IN THE MODERN WORLD

ACTIVITY TITLE: Linear Correlation

LEARNING TARGET: a. gather at least 25 real-life data of two different variables
b. use a sampling technique to determine how the sample is going to be chosen.
c. create a real-life word problem and determine the strength of relationship between the two variables
using Pearson’s r
d. test the significance of the data gathered.

Reminders in doing the project:

1. The report must have:

o Introduction/background of the study (at least 5 sentences)
- What is the topic all about?
- Why did you choose that study?
- What will be the significance of the result of your study to the MCC community?
o Sampling Scheme (at least 5 sentences)
- Sampling technique
o Reason for choosing the sampling technique
- Sample size of each group must be 25
- Sampling Process (step-by-step)
o Problem
- You must create your own problem based on your chosen topic. There should be no
same topic or problem within your class.

2. The report must be submitted together with:

o Proof of data gathering (respondents’ name and section)
o Documentation
o Rubric

3. The report must be printed in a short bond paper and must be placed in a short (color-coded) folder
(The folder with clear front part and colored at the back part)

4. The report must follow the correct font size, font style, and spacing.
o Font size: 16 (title) and 12 (body)
o Font style: Arial
o Spacing: 1.5
5. Deadline of the Project, is on , ____________________, 10:00AM.
o The Task may be submitted on or before the said deadline.
 Criteria Excellent (5)
The introduction and
content of the study is
outstandingly developed
and has logical
Content and
connections of ideas. The
Cohesion of Problem
problem is excellently
(x4)
constructed and is easy to
understand and does not
create confusion to the
audience.
The study used sampling
technique which is very
appropriate to the topic.
The sampling process is
Explained in a very
Appropriateness
detailed manner and done
of the
in such a way that it can
Sampling
precisely describe the
Scheme
characteristics of the
(x3)
whole population and can
lead to correct and
accurate result of the
study. The sample size is
appropriate.
Problem is correctly solved
Accuracy of the and shows a neat
Computation complete step-by-step
(x2) solution with an
appropriate interpretation.
The written work is neatly
Neatness of work and legibly presented
away from any form of
alterations.
RUBRIC
Indicators:
- The report is printed in a short bond paper.
- The report, proof of data gathering and rubrics are
placed in a short clear folder in this order:
1. Front Page
2. Report
3. Rubric
4. Documentation
- The report is submitted on the deadline.
- The report followed the correct spacing,
font style and size.
Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Fair (2) Score
The introduction and
The introduction and The introduction and
content of the study is
content of the study is content of the study is
somehow developed and
developed and has logical not properly developed
has some logical
connections of ideas. The and does not have
connections of ideas. The
problem is properly logical connections of
problem is constructed
constructed and is easy to ideas. The problem is
and is somehow clear but
understand but one idea not clearly constructed
2-3 ideas created
created confusion to the and creates confusion to
confusion to the
audience. the audience.
audience.
The study used sampling
technique which is The sampling technique
The sampling
appropriate to the topic. used in the study is
technique used in the
The sampling process is appropriate to the topic
study is inappropriate
in a detailed manner but the sampling
with the topic and the
and done in such a process is not explained
selection of sample
way that it can properly in a
will lead to invalid
describe the detailed manner and
results of the study.
characteristics of the the sample cannot
There is no explanation
whole population and properly describe the
of the sampling process
can lead to correct and characteristics of the
and the sample size is
accurate result of the population. The sample
incorrect.
study. The sample size size is incorrect.
is appropriate
There are 1 – 2 mistakes There are 3 – 4 mistakes More than 4 errors can
on the solution. on the solution. be seen on the solution.
The written work has
The written work is neat The written work has
alterations but still neat
and is easy to alterations, not neat and
and is easy to
understand. is difficult to understand.
understand.
TOTAL SCORE:
All indicators Three (3) Only two (2) Only one (1)
are met. indicators are indicators are indicator is
met. met. met.
 STUDENT PEER EVALUATION RUBRIC
(Number of copies per student is equal to( the number of members in a group)

NAME OF RATEE:
 MATHEMATICS IN THE MODERN WORLD

FINAL GRADE
TOPIC OF THE STUDY: The Correlation Between the Prelim Grades in P.E. and Midterm
Grades in P.E.

Section:
GROUP INDIVIDUAL
TECHNICALITIES FINAL
NAME OF STUDENT GRADE GRADE
(10%) GRADE
(70%) (20%)

1. Paguyo, Angelyn

2. Payabyab. John Winther

3. Sanchez, Amy Lyn

4. Sioco, Andrea Sophia

5.

SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL GRADE (20%)

FINAL INDIVIDUAL
Average Individual Grade
NAME OF STUDENT GRADE (20%)

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
 PROBLEM:

Our group wishes to know if there is a relationship between Prelim Grade in P.E (x) and
Midterm Grade in P.E (y). The data was taken exclusively from 25 students. Using a 0.05
level of significance to determine the answer, the following data is shown on the table below.

Participant x y xy x2 y2
1 92.25 98 9,040.5 8,510.0625 9,604
2 99 99 9,801 9,801 9,801
3 99 98 9,702 9,702 9,604
4 99 99 9,801 9,801 9,801
5 86.78 98.66 8,561.7148 7,530.7684 9,733.7956
6 89 90 8,010 7,921 8,100
7 90 97 8,730 8,100 9,409
8 88 97 8,536 7,744 9,409
9 96 99 9,504 9,216 9,801
10 96 98 9,408 9,216 9,604
11 88 98 8,624 7,744 9,604
12 92 100 9,200 8,464 10,000
13 96 97 9,312 9,216 9,409
14 85 97 8,245 7,225 9,409
15 96.59 98 9,465.82 9,329.6281 9,604
16 81.61 96.35 7,863.12 6,660.20 9,283.3225
17 82 98 8,036 6,724 9,604
18 80 85 6.800 6,400 7,225
19 90 94 8,460 8,100 8,836
20 86 93 7,998 7,396 8,649
21 95 98 9,310 9,025 9,604
22 86 98 8,428 7,396 9,604
23 99 89 8,811 9,801 7,921
24 87 98 8,526 7,569 9,604
25 79 92 7,268 6,241 8,464
TOTAL 2,258.23 2,405.01 217,441.1583 204,931.659 231,687.1181
Correlation Analysis:

SOLUTION:

𝑛(∑ 𝑥𝑦) − (∑ 𝑥)(∑ 𝑦)

𝑟=
√[𝑛(∑ 𝑥2 ) − (∑ 𝑥)2 ][𝑛(∑ 𝑦2 ) − (∑ 𝑦)2 ]

25(217,441.1583) − (2,258.23)(2,405.01)
𝑟=
[25(204,931.659) − (2,258.23)2 ]
√
[25(231,687.1181) − (2,405.01)2 ]

5,436,028.9575 − 5,431,065.7323
𝑟=
[5,123,291,475 − 5,099,602.7329]
√
[5,792,177.9525 − 5,784,073.1001]

4,963.2252
𝑟=
√(23,688.7421) (8104.8524)

4,963.2252
𝑟=
√191,993,758.2622

4,963.2252
𝑟=
13,856.1812
𝑟 = 0.358

𝑟 = 0.36
 INTERPRETATION:

The P.E. grades in Prelim and Midterm has a low positive correlation.

Testing the Significance of r:

Given Values:

∑X = 2,258.23
∑y = 2,405.01
∑xy = 217,441.1583
∑x2 = 204,931.659
t-comp and t-crit
∑y2 = 231,687.1181
t-comp: 1.984
SOLUTION: t-crit: ±2.0686

t-computed:
INTERPRETATION:
𝒓√ 𝒏 − 𝟐
𝒕=
√𝟏 − 𝒓𝟐 t-comp=1.984 < t-
critical=2.0686

𝟎. 𝟑𝟔√𝟐𝟓 − 𝟐 Null: Ho - There is no

𝒕= significant relationship
√𝟏 − 𝟎. 𝟑𝟔𝟐 between P.E. grades in Prelim
and P.E. grades in Midterm.

𝟎. 𝟑𝟔√𝟐𝟑
𝒕=
√𝟏 − 𝟎. 𝟏𝟐𝟗𝟔

𝟎. 𝟑𝟔(𝟒. 𝟕𝟗𝟓𝟖)
𝒕=
𝟎. 𝟖𝟕𝟎𝟒
𝟏. 𝟕𝟐𝟔
𝒕=
𝟎. 𝟖𝟕𝟎𝟒

𝒕 = 1.984
Regression Analysis:

SOLUTION m: SOLUTION b:

𝑛(∑𝑥𝑦) − (∑𝑥)(∑𝑦) ∑𝑥 ∑𝑦
𝑚= 𝑥̅ = 𝑦̅ =
𝑛(∑𝑥 2 ) − (∑𝑥)2 𝑛 𝑛

2,258.23 2,405.01
25(217,441.1583) − (2,258.23)(2,405.01) 𝑥̅ = 𝑦̅ =
𝑚= 25 25
25(204,931.659) − (2,258.23)2
𝑥̅ = 90.329 𝑦̅ = 96.200
5,436,028,9575 − 5,431,065.7323
𝑚=
5,123,291.475 − 5,099,602.7329 𝑥̅ = 90.33 𝑦̅ = 96.20

4,963.2252 𝑏 = 𝑦̅ − 𝑚𝑥̅
𝑚=
23,688.7421
𝑏 = 96.20 − [0.21(90.33)]
𝑚 = 0.209
𝑏 = 96.20 − 18.970
𝑚 = 0.21
𝑏 = 77.5

REGRESSION
REGRESSION
EQUATIONEQUATION

𝒚 = 𝒎𝒙 + 𝒃

𝒚 = 𝟎. 𝟐𝟏𝒙 + 𝟕𝟕. 𝟓

𝒚 = 𝟎. 𝟐𝟏(𝟗𝟐. 𝟐𝟓) + 𝟕𝟕. 𝟓

𝒚 = 𝟏𝟗. 𝟑𝟕𝟐𝟓 + 𝟕𝟕. 𝟓

𝒚 = 𝟗𝟔. 𝟖𝟕𝟐𝟓

𝒚 = 𝟗𝟕
 Mabalacat City College
Institute of Arts and Sciences
Mabalacat City, Pampanga

The Correlation Between the…

“Correlation and Regression Analysis”

Submitted by:

Submitted to:
Ms. Gracia T. Canlas
Things to accomplish aside from the given format above,

1. Front/Title Page – Title of Study, “Correlation and Regression Analysis”,

Submitted by: Names of Members, Section, Submitted to: Name of Teacher.
2. Introduction
3. Sampling Technique
4. List of Names of Participants
5. Documentation (pictures)
6. Attach Rubric
7. Peer Evaluation