Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
SUBMITTED BY:
Burguillos, Denise B.
Pangulayan, Pinky S.
TEAM 4
SUBMITTED TO:
RESULTS
This chapter includes presentation analysis, and interpretation of data based on the study
conducted. It presents the data gathered through the research instruments as it were used together to
answer the question raised in this study. There were one hundred (100) college students from CAS
Department New Era University who has been part of the study.
Table 1.1
Profile of the Respondents
CAS Program
Foreign Political Public
Biology Economics Psychology
Year Service Science Administration
Level
% % % % % %
10
1st 9 0 0 0 0 15 50 0 0
0
10
2nd 0 0 15 12 15 50 10 100
0
Grand 10 10
100 100 100
Total 0 0
17 and
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3.33 0 0
below
10
18-20 9 0 0 0 0 14 46.67 0 0
0
1st
21-23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 and
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
above
17 and
0 0 1 6.67 3 25 0 0 0 0
below
86.6
18-20 0 0 13 9 75 13 43.33 10 100
6
2nd
21-23 0 0 1 6.67 0 0 1 3.33 0 0
24 and
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3.33 0 0
above
Grand 10 10
9 15 100 12 30 100 10 100
Total 0 0
Foreign Political
Year Biology Economics Psychology Public Ad
Service Science
Level
% % % % % %
55.5 26.6
Yes 5 12 0 8 0 17 0 0
st 6 7
1
44.4 23.3
No 4 3 0 4 0 13 0 0
4 3
66.6
Yes 0 0 12 80 8 9 30 7 70
nd 7
2
33.3
No 0 0 3 20 4 6 20 3 30
3
Grand
100 100 100 100 100
Total
SD
Weighted
Mean
Foreign Political
Year Biology Economics Psychology Public Ad
Service Science
Level
% % % % % %
44.4 33.3
Yes 4 0 0 0 0 10 0 0
4 3
1st
55.5 16.6
No 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0
6 7
86.6 41.6
Yes 0 0 13 5 12 40 6 60
nd
7 7
2 58.3
13.3
No 0 0 2 7 3 10 4 40
3 3
Grand
9 100 15 100 12 100 30 100 10 100
Total
SD
Weighted
Mean
Foreign Political
Year Biology Economics Psychology Public Ad
Service Science
Level
% % % % % %
43.3
Yes 9 100 0 0 0 0 13 0 0
1st 3
No 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6.67 0 0
86.6 41.6 43.3
Yes 0 0 13 5 13 7 70
nd 7 7 3
2
13.3 58.3
No 0 0 2 7 2 6.67 3 30
3 3
Grand
9 100 15 100 12 100 30 100 10 100
Total
SD
Weighted
Mean
Foreign Political
Year Biology Economics Psychology Public Ad
Service Science
Level
% % % % % %
66.6
Yes 6 0 0 0 0 9 30 0 0
7
1st
33.3
No 3 0 0 0 0 6 20 0 0
3
53.3 58.3
Yes 0 0 8 7 9 30 7 70
3 3
2nd
46.6 41.6
No 0 0 7 5 6 20 3 30
7 7
Grand
9 100 15 100 12 100 30 100 10 100
Total
SD
Weighted
Mean
Foreign Political
Year Biology Economics Psychology Public Ad
Service Science
Level
% % % % % %
66.6 46.6
Yes 6 0 0 0 0 14 0 0
st 7 7
1
33.3
No 3 0 0 0 0 1 3.33 0 0
3
93.3 41.6 36.6
Yes 0 0 14 5 11 8 80
3 7 7
2nd
58.3 13.3
No 0 0 1 6.67 7 4 2 20
3 3
Grand
9 100 15 100 12 100 30 100 10 100
Total
SD
Weighted
Mean
Foreign Political
Year Biology Economics Psychology Public Ad
Service Science
Level
% % % % % %
66.6 43.3
Yes 6 0 0 0 0 13 0 0
st 7 3
1
33.3
No 3 0 0 0 0 2 6.67 0 0
3
41.4 33.3
Yes 0 0 12 80 5 10 8 80
nd 7 3
2
58.3 16.6
No 0 0 3 20 7 5 2 20
3 7
Grand
9 100 15 100 12 100 30 100 10 100
Total
SD
Weighted
Mean
Foreign Political
Year Biology Economics Psychology Public Ad
Service Science
Level
% % % % % %
66.6 46.6
Yes 6 0 0 0 0 14 0 0
st 7 7
1
33.3
No 3 0 0 0 0 1 3.33 0 0
3
26.6
Yes 0 0 12 80 3 25 8 6 60
nd 7
2
23.3
No 0 0 3 20 9 75 7 4 40
3
Grand
9 100 15 100 12 100 30 100 10 100
Total
SD
Table 2.11
How do you rate the variety if the food served?
Somewhat
Satisfied
7 77.78 0 0 0 0 8 26.67 0 0
st
1
Somewhat
Dissatisfied
1 11.11 0 0 0 0 3 10 0 0
Very
Dissatisfied
1 11.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Somewhat
Satisfied
0 0 8 53.33 6 50 7 23.33 6 60
nd
2
Somewhat
Dissatisfied
0 0 2 13.33 4 33.33 4 13.33 3 30
Very
Dissatisfied
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3.33 0 0
Grand 1 1 3 1
9 100 100 100 100 100
Total 5 2 0 0
SD
Weighted
Mean
Table 2.12
How do you rate the quality of the food provided?
Foreign Political
Year Biology Economics Psychology Public Ad
Service Science
Level
% % % % % %
Very 13.
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
Satisfied 33
Somewhat 10 23.
9 0 0 0 0 7 0 0
st
Satisfied 0 33
1
Somewhat 13.
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
Dissatisfied 33
Very
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dissatisfied
Weighted
Mean
Table 2.13
How do you rate your meal experience?
Foreign Political
Year Biology Economics Psychology Public Ad
Service Science
Level
% % % % % %
st
1 Very 13.
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
Satisfied 33
77
Somewhat
7 .7 0 0 0 0 6 20 0 0
Satisfied
8
Somewhat 2 22 0 0 0 0 5 16. 0 0
Dissatisfied .2 67
2
Weighted
Mean
Table 2.14
How satisfied are you with the taste of the food?
Weighted
Mean
Table 2.15
How do you rate the service staff?
Weighted
Mean
Table 2.16
How helpful is the service staff, if you require assistance at mealtimes?
Weighted
Mean
Table 2.17
How do you rate the helpfulness of the service staff at mealtimes?
Foreign Political
Year Biology Economics Psychology Public Ad
Service Science
Level
% % % % % %
st
1 22
Very
2 .2 0 0 0 0 3 10 0 0
Satisfied
2
55
Somewhat 13.
5 .5 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
Satisfied 33
5
Somewhat 1 11 0 0 0 0 8 26. 0 0
Dissatisfied .1 67
1
Weighted
Mean
Table 2.18
How do you rate the quality of the facilities?
Foreign Political
Year Biology Economics Psychology Public Ad
Service Science
Level
% % % % % %
st
1 11
Very 16.
1 .1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0
Satisfied 67
1
44
Somewhat 13.
4 .4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
Satisfied 33
4
Somewhat 4 44 0 0 0 0 6 20 0 0
Dissatisfied .4
4
Weighted
Mean
Table 2.19
How do you rate the ambiance?
Foreign Political
Year Biology Economics Psychology Public Ad
Service Science
Level
% % % % % %
st
1 33
Very
3 .3 0 0 0 0 3 10 0 0
Satisfied
3
33
Somewhat
3 .3 0 0 0 0 6 20 0 0
Satisfied
3
Somewhat 3 33 0 0 0 0 3 10 0 0
Dissatisfied .3
3
Weighted
Mean
Table 2.20
How do you rate the price of food?
Foreign Political
Year Biology Economics Psychology Public Ad
Service Science
Level
% % % % % %
st
1 22
Very 16.
2 .2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0
Satisfied 67
2
66
Somewhat
6 .6 0 0 0 0 6 20 0 0
Satisfied
7
Somewhat 1 11 0 0 0 0 3 10 0 0
Dissatisfied .1
1