ESSAY

1
Table of Contents
Introduction 3
Different types of organization 3
Organizations structures and functions 5
Conclusion 6
References 7
Introduction
Business organizations are commonly isolated into two portions which are private and open. The
two kinds of associations are found in UK in tremendous number. Private associations are those
that are owned by individuals. These sorts of organizations incorporate sole ownerships,
association concerns, privately owned businesses, joint endeavours and so on. But Public
organizations includes public stake in the company. Additionally, governments are similarly
connected with this kind of organization for their humungous activities and enormous size.

Different types of organization

Difference between profit, non-profit and non-governmental organizations

A NGO's assets may increase with external help and associations but it has no association with
legislative situations and hence there is no need for government interference. They are hence
called common society organizations as they a founded through society registration.

A non-profit (without any benefits) association uses the extra assets it has to meet the end goal of
the association. it doesn't as opposed to separate its assets between among the investors or the
stakeholders of the organization.

The greatest contrast with a NGO is the extent of work that most non-benefits accept. Numerous
non-benefits are partnered with holy places, young men and young ladies clubs, and graduated
class affiliations. A NGO, then again, has more extensive and globally determined impression,
frequently working in disengaged and remote of rebellion, far reaching starvation and ailment,
army installations, and huge scale catastrophe, for example, sea tempest alleviation.

Virgin Group Ltd.: A privately owned business which has been there for more than 50 years
now. At first, it grabbed a large market share is by providing discounts. It was not made public. It
was confined to current investors. Henceforth, the possession was focused within a few investors
only (Galloway, 2010).

Tesco: It is an open restricted organization of UK where open is significantly intrigued. It started

off with individual ownership and was later registered as an organization. The organization
dispersed its assets on and turned into a public limited company.
National Health Services: This association gets its assets to work business through open
investment. The principle proverb of these sorts of associations is social help and not benefit
making. NHS was set up with the objective of giving wellbeing administrations to open on the
loose.

Size and scope of organization

In venereal there are five different types of associations like private organization, public
concerns, governmental organizations, non-profits, and NGOs.

It is observed that the private concerns are mostly corporate affiliates. They have legal
personality in their possessed rights. In this manner, different resources and the properties are
claimed by organization but not their solo ones. On the other side the benefits of the solo ones
are not allow the associational use. With these important lines, the negative consequences of the
individual are restricted.

As told by Subramanian et al.(2016), restricted corporations are mainly falsely accused by two or
more not so significant people. The more important thing is that co workers need to present
various reports, for instance, reminder of articles of affiliation and affiliation itself.

As per Campbell (2018), the restricted organization require one solo investor who can assist in
providing the association the capability to offer massive things to the general society In any case,
the association offers a r4ange of things and opportunities to the individuals who are eager to
sign a business agreement with the organization. It can be found that each open constrained
organization has begun as a solo open restricted organization.

According to Forés and Camisón (2016), small organizations have the more comfortable position
over micro sized associations. They serve a bigger market and can change their strategy as and
when needed annually. They are prone to expansion of their business in new market with already
existing items. They have more assets to shield themselves from new sections to the market
(Church and Waclawski, 2017). However, the small sized businesses have confronted hazard
because of the challenge with large organization. The large businesses have way more assets
which is what makes it tough for small business to expand and survive in the presence of large
enterprises.
 In terms of market share micro businesses target localized market which means the market share
is not constant, it is very small and the growth here is limited. The sustainability depends upon
the small community of people micro businesses focus on (Mayer and Roberta, 2017).

Small Businesses have the tendency to hold on to their limited market share which is bigger than
micro companies but also look forward to expansion. The profit share is better than micro
companies, around 10%-15% and always looks for sustainability.

Large enterprises are focused on a bigger market share and bigger profitability. They take up
almost 75% of the available market size through retail chains and are constantly eveolving not to
simply attain sustainable environment for business but more towards expansion and increasing
its market share (Roberts, 2018).

Organizations structures and functions

Different kinds of structures relating to size and scope of operations

As expressed by, organizational structures are founded on the capacity of business of the
company in view of the fact that an organization always decides upon their structure and
objectives depending on the services or products that they provide. In relation to Tesco the basic
objective is motivated towards expansion of profitability of the organization, and they make a
compelling hierarchical structure in the company so as to ensure a streamed flow of uniform
functioning in their association. Business scope in association to Tesco is to serve consumers
with their items through chains of retail shops and online business (Rosenberg Hansen and
Ferlie, 2016). For administrative purposes consistency is required here to control justifiable
growth of size of the business. Along these lines, adequacy in the setting of genuine goal and
hierarchical structure can help Associated Tesco to accomplish hierarchical capacities since it
causes workers to know in regards to their job with viability.

Complexities of transnational, international and global organisation structures

● International companies are importers and exporters that are not interested in vesting outside the
home country.
● Global companies invest and are present in multiple locations around the globe. They generally
have one headquarter to manage global strategy. The emphasis is laid here on the expansion,
volume, management of cost and the efficiency with which the business functions.

● Transnational companies are complex organizations in comparison to the other two. They
regularly invest in operating in foreign countries. They have a central business facility but when
it comes to decision making, research and development and marketing of products it is
dependent and co-ordinated in the individual markets that are located across the globe.

How functions relate to overall organisation mission and objectives

An organization’s objectives reflect and stream normally from the mission for the organization.
How the organization is going to function is highly dependent on the mission and objectives of
the organization. The organizational functioning is communicated in its statement of objectives.
In this way authoritative functioning must reflect and flow smoothly from a hierarchical strategic
point of view, ensuring and intending to reflect from the consequences of a natural goals and
missions of the organization.

Conclusion
It can be observed that micro, small and large organizations have their market share defined and
the scope of business too. For profit, non-profit and nongovernmental organizations their goals
and objectives are set out to be different which is why the functioning and structure similarly
varies. This also indicates that while non-governmental organizations can focus towards social
responsibilities non-profit organizations do engage in the same with a government association
and it may involve financial help for sustenance from the government.
References

Burstein, P., 2019. The influence of organizations on policy: theories, findings,

conclusions. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 8(1), pp.1-22.

Campbell, D., 2018. The socially constructed organization. Routledge.

Church, A.H. and Waclawski, J., 2017. Designing and using organizational surveys. Routledge.

Forés, B. and Camisón, C., 2016. Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend
on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size?. Journal of
Business Research, 69(2), pp.831-848.

Kostova, T. and Hult, G.T.M., 2016. Meyer and Peng’s 2005 article as a foundation for an
expanded and refined international business research agenda: Context, organizations, and
theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(1), pp.23-32.

Mayer, N.Z. and Roberta, A.G., 2017. Social movement organizations: Growth, decay, and
change. In Social Movements in an organizational society (pp. 121-142). Routledge.

Roberts, J., 2018. Multinational business service firms: development of multinational

organization structures in the UK business service sector. Routledge.

Rosenberg Hansen, J. and Ferlie, E., 2016. Applying strategic management theories in public
sector organizations: Developing a Typology. Public Management Review, 18(1), pp.1-19.

Subramanian, R., Rahe, M., Nagadevara, V. and Jayachandran, C., 2016. Organizational Factors
and Innovation–Analysis of Different Types of Organizations. In Rethinking Innovation (pp.
134-160). Routledge India.

Thompson, J.D., 2017. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory.
Routledge.