Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract: The Government of Indonesia through Indonesia Stock Exchange’s “Yuk Nabung
Saham” national campaign has the purpose of increasing the number of new investors,
especially youth, in Indonesia. The campaign persuades people to invest in stock market because
of the potential return offered by investing in stock market, supported by the strong economic
indicators of Indonesia. Meanwhile, in first semester 2018, the global stock markets, including
Indonesia Stock Market, experienced high volatility with the tendency of weakening that affects
the return that investors get. A lot of investors shocked and there are a lot of speculations and
news spread among investor about the reasoning and impact of the global stock indices. The
results of similar studies show that there is linkage between global markets, either stock market
or commodities market, where movement in one market in the global can affect other countries’
stock market movement. A need therefore arises to investigate the relationship between the
global markets toward Indonesia Stock Market (IHSG), where the researcher chose to research
the relationship between four global stock indices those are Dow Jones Industrial Average /
DJIA (United States of America), NIKKEI 225 (Japan), Hang Seng (Hongkong), and STI
(Singapore) and three commodities market (crude oil, coal, and gold) towards the movement of
Jakarta Composite Index (JCI) or known as IHSG. The data used in this research is the monthly
secondary data of each variable. By using multiple linear regression method, this research found
that simultaneously, the returns of global stock indexes and commodities have significant effect
toward IHSG returns and are able to explain 45.6% of the variation. Therefore, the implication
of this study is that we can take into account the returns of global stock indexes and global
commodities as consideration to predict the return and to invest in IHSG.
Keywords: IHSG returns, global stock indexes, global commodities returns, capital market,
multiple linear regression
___________________________________________________________________________
1. Introduction
Indonesia is one country that is highly dependent on international trade in commodities and
energies. Indonesia’s exports and imports are mostly dominated by trade in the oil and gas
sector, mining commodities, and energy. This is also in line with global energy demand, where
fuel for supplying and producing global energy is currently dominated by crude oil, coal and gas
due to available infrastructure, adequate technology, and low production costs.
33
Copyright © 2019 ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS-All rights reserved
International Journal of Business and Economy
e-ISSN: 2682-8359 | Vol. 1, No. 2, 33-42, 2019
http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbec
ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS
The numerous and importance of this sector is also reflected in the number of companies
engaged in the sector, including those listed on the stock exchange. Currently, a number of listed
companies with the largest capitalization in Indonesia are also operating in this sector, including
PT United Tractors Tbk (UNTR), PT Indo Tambangraya Megah (ITMG), PT Adaro Energy
(ADRO), and others. As well as in the years where global commodity, oil and gas and energy
prices experienced a peak period, many large companies in this field had once triumphed in their
time and had large capitalization, but experienced a severe decline in stock prices due to a fall in
commodity prices in 2009, even to experience bankruptcy and delisting, such as PT Bumi
Resources Tbk (BUMI), PT Berlian Laju Tanker Tbk (BLTA), and others. At that time,
numerous investors in the Indonesia stock market suffered heavy losses, even bankruptcy caused
by the falling prices of commodity stocks engaged in mining, oil and gas. After the crash,
investors in Indonesia often discuss and link the movement of global commodity prices,
especially coal and oil with the movement of the stock index.
Meanwhile, in first semester 2018, the global stock markets, including Indonesia Stock Market,
experienced high volatility with the tendency of weakening that affects the return that investors
get. A lot of investors shocked and there are a lot of speculations and news spread among
investor about the reasoning and impact of the global stock indexes and commodities. A need
therefore arises to investigate the relationship between the global markets toward IHSG, where
the researcher chose to research the relationship between four global stock indices those are Dow
Jones Industrial Average / DJIA (United States of America), NIKKEI 225 (Japan), Hang Seng
(Hongkong), and STI (Singapore) and three commodities market (crude oil, coal, and gold)
toward the movement of IHSG.
2. Literature Review
An empirical study on dynamic relationship between crude oil price and Indian Stock Market
indicates the existence of long-term relationship between crude oil price and Indian stock market.
The research revealed that a positive shock in oil price has a small but persistence and growing
positive impact on Indian stock markets in short run (Sahu et al., 2014).
Ono (2011) has conducted a research about the crude oil price shocks and stock market in BRICs
(Brazil, Russia, India, and China). The results suggest that whereas real stock returns positively
respond to some of the oil price indicators with statistical significance for China, India and
Russia, those of Brazil do not show any significant responses.
Adam, et al. (2015) has conducted a research about the modelling of the dynamics relationship
between world crude oil prices and the stock market in Indonesia. The study found that there was
a significant dynamical relationship between world crude oil prices and Indonesian composite
index, both in the long-term and in the short-term.
34
Copyright © 2019 ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS-All rights reserved
International Journal of Business and Economy
e-ISSN: 2682-8359 | Vol. 1, No. 2, 33-42, 2019
http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbec
ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS
3. Methodology
Conceptual Framework
DJIA
H1
NIKKEI
H2
HANGSENG H3
STI H4
IHSG
H5
COAL
H6
GOLD H7
OIL
Figure 1: Conceptual Framework
Hypotheses
H1= Dow Jones Industrial Average Index has significant effect to IHSG.
H2 = Nikkei has significant effect to IHSG.
H3 = Hang Seng has significant effect to IHSG.
H4 = Strait Times Index has significant effect to IHSG.
H5 = Oil prices has significant effect to IHSG.
H6 = Coal prices has significant effect to IHSG.
H7 = Gold prices has significant effect to IHSG.
H8 = DJIA, Nikkei, Hang Seng, STI, coal prices, gold prices, and oil prices
simultaneously have significant effect to IHSG.
35
Copyright © 2019 ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS-All rights reserved
International Journal of Business and Economy
e-ISSN: 2682-8359 | Vol. 1, No. 2, 33-42, 2019
http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbec
ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS
All the secondary data above are obtained from Investing.
However, to convert the closing price data into returns, author uses this formula:
\The independent variables represent the inputs or causes, or are tested to see if they are the
cause. Independent variables used in this research are mentioned below:
1. The returns of DJIA, symbolized as “X1”
2. The returns of NIKKEI, symbolized as “X2”
3. The returns of Hang Seng, symbolized as “X3”
4. The returns of STI, symbolized as “X4”
5. The returns of Crude oil prices, symbolized as “X5”
6. The returns of Coal prices, symbolized as “X6”
7. The returns of Gold prices, symbolized as “X7”
The dependent variable represents the output or the effect, or is tested to see if it is the effect.
Dependent variable used in this research is:
1. IHSG price, symbolized as “Y”
4. Data Analysis
Linearity Test
36
Copyright © 2019 ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS-All rights reserved
International Journal of Business and Economy
e-ISSN: 2682-8359 | Vol. 1, No. 2, 33-42, 2019
http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbec
ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS
Normality Test
Table 1: Kolmogorov Smirnov Test
One Sample K-S Test Unstandardized Residual
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.013
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .257
Kolmogorov Smirnov test is used to determine the data used are normally distributed. If the test
is equal or less than 5% then the data are not normally distributed. It can be seen from the table
below that our data are normally distributed as the Asymp. Sig. is 0.257 or greater than 5%. By
looking at Table 1, it can be concluded that all variables used in this study have levels
significance above 0.05. This means that the data used in this study has a normal distribution and
shows that the regression model is feasible because it meets the assumptions of normality.
Multicollinearity Test
Table 2: Multicollinearity Test
Model Collinearity Statistics
Tolerance VIF
DJIA .440 2.271
NIKKEI 225 .438 2.284
Hang Seng .298 3.356
STI .294 3.402
Crude Oil .745 1.342
Coal Newcastle .806 1.241
Gold .653 1.532
Multicollinearity is tested using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) and tolerance score of each
variable. As seen in Table 2, all variables do not have multicollinearity problem as all VIF is less
than 10 with tolerance above 0.10, as it is the maximum threshold allowed for multiple
regression. This means that the regression model in this study is feasible because it meets the
assumptions of no multicollinearity exists in the independent variables.
Heteroscedasticity Test
We use graphical method to see if our model does not violate the heteroscedasticity test, and
based on figure 3, it can be seen that the existing points do not form a certain pattern and spread
above and below the zero so that it can be concluded that in this study the regression model used
did not experience heteroscedasticity, hence, our data are homoscedastic.
37
Copyright © 2019 ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS-All rights reserved
International Journal of Business and Economy
e-ISSN: 2682-8359 | Vol. 1, No. 2, 33-42, 2019
http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbec
ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS
Autocorrelation Test
Durbin Watson Test is employed to test for autocorrelation.
Forn = 119
K =7
dL = 1.5786
dU = 1.826The value of Durbin Watson stat is 1.944. If the data have dl<dw<4-du, then the
data pass autocorrelation test. With 5% significance level, our model pass the autocorrelation
test, 1.5786<1.944< 2.1731 and indicates that there is no autocorrelation between the data.
38
Copyright © 2019 ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS-All rights reserved
International Journal of Business and Economy
e-ISSN: 2682-8359 | Vol. 1, No. 2, 33-42, 2019
http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbec
ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS
From the table above, we are able to get the value of the regression coefficients for each
independent variable along with the constant coefficients. The value of each regression
coefficient is then substituted to the regression model. Hence, the regression model resulted for
this research is:
𝐼𝐻𝑆𝐺 =
0.837 + 0.261 𝐷𝐽𝐼𝐴 – 0.034 𝑁𝐼𝐾𝐾𝐸𝐼 225 – 0.042 𝐻𝑎𝑛𝑔 𝑆𝑒𝑛𝑔 +
0.630 𝑆𝑇𝐼 – 0.092 𝐶𝑟𝑢𝑑𝑒 𝑂𝑖𝑙 + 0.061 𝐶𝑜𝑎𝑙 + 0.066 𝐺𝑜𝑙𝑑 + 𝜖
Regression coefficients on the independent variables indicate how much the change in the
dependent variable (Y) if the independent variable (Xn) increases by 1 unit and other variables
assumed to be constant, depending on the plus or minus the coefficient of the independent
variables. Regression coefficient is plus, it means that the independent variable (Xn) has positive
correlation to dependent variable (Y). If regression coefficient is negative, it means that
independent variable (Xn) has negative correlation to dependent variable (Y).
39
Copyright © 2019 ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS-All rights reserved
International Journal of Business and Economy
e-ISSN: 2682-8359 | Vol. 1, No. 2, 33-42, 2019
http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbec
ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS
f. The regression coefficient of the fifth independent variable Crude oil price is -0.092. It
means that for every 1 point increase in Crude oil price, IHSG will decrease by 0.092,
with the assumption of other independent variables are fixed.
g. The regression coefficient of the sixth independent variable coal price is 0.061. It means
that for every 1 point increase in STI, IHSG will increase by 0.061, with the assumption
of other independent variables are fixed.
h. The regression coefficient of the seventh independent variable gold price is 0.066. It
means that for every 1 point increase in STI, IHSG will increase by 0.066, with the
assumption of other independent variables are fixed.
We can also see sort the most dominant factor to the least dominant factor influencing the return
of IHSG by seeing the coefficient of regression, where the order is as follow:
1. Return of STI
2. Return of DJIA
3. Return of Crude Oil
4. Return of Gold
5. Return of Coal
6. Return of Hang Seng
7. Return of NIKKEI
Table 4: t-Test
Model t Sig.
(Constant) 2.542 .012
DJIA 2.045 .043
NIKKEI 225 -.373 .710
Hang Seng -.396 .693
STI 4.900 .000
Crude Oil -2.155 .033
Coal Newcastle 1.070 .287
Gold .823 .412
40
Copyright © 2019 ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS-All rights reserved
International Journal of Business and Economy
e-ISSN: 2682-8359 | Vol. 1, No. 2, 33-42, 2019
http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbec
ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS
The interpretation is as follow:
1. With significance level of 5% and two-tailed method, with the p-value of 0.043, we can
conclude that the return of DJIA does significantly affect the return of IHSG.
2. With significance level of 5% and two-tailed method, with the p-value of 0.710, we can
conclude that the return of NIKKEI 225 does not significantly affect the return of IHSG.
3. With significance level of 5% and two-tailed method, with the p-value of 0.693, we can
conclude that the return of Hang Seng does not significantly affect the return of IHSG.
4. With significance level of 5% and two-tailed method, with the p-value of 0.000, we can
conclude that the return of STI does significantly affect the return of IHSG.
5. With significance level of 5% and two-tailed method, with the p-value of 0.033, we can
conclude that the return of crude oil prices does significantly affect the return of IHSG.
6. With significance level of 5% and two-tailed method, with the p-value of 0.287, we can
conclude that the return of coal prices does not significantly affect the return of IHSG.
7. With significance level of 5% and two-tailed method, with the p-value of 0.412, we can
conclude that the return of gold prices does not significantly affect the return of IHSG.
The regression model that was used in this study has the adjusted R2 of 0.456. Therefore, it can
be taken into conclusion that 45.6% of the variability of IHSG returns as the dependent variable
can be explained by the return of DJIA, NIKKEI 225, Hang Seng, STI, crude oil prices, coal
prices, and gold prices. Whilst the rest 54.4% variability of IHSG return is explained by another
variable that does not included in this regression model of the study.
41
Copyright © 2019 ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS-All rights reserved
International Journal of Business and Economy
e-ISSN: 2682-8359 | Vol. 1, No. 2, 33-42, 2019
http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbec
ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS
5. Conclusion and Recommendation
Based on the discussion and analysis result in the previous chapters, it can be concluded that:
1. Simultaneously: Return of DJIA, NIKKEI, Hang Seng, STI, Crude Oil, Coal, and gold
have significant effect to the IHSG return within period of 2009-2018, with the regression
model:
𝑰𝑯𝑺𝑮 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟑𝟕 + 𝟎. 𝟐𝟔𝟏 𝑫𝑱𝑰𝑨 – 𝟎. 𝟎𝟑𝟒 𝑵𝑰𝑲𝑲𝑬𝑰 𝟐𝟐𝟓 – 𝟎. 𝟎𝟒𝟐 𝑯𝒂𝒏𝒈 𝑺𝒆𝒏𝒈
+ 𝟎. 𝟔𝟑𝟎 𝑺𝑻𝑰 – 𝟎. 𝟎𝟗𝟐 𝑪𝒓𝒖𝒅𝒆 𝑶𝒊𝒍 + 𝟎. 𝟎𝟔𝟏 𝑪𝒐𝒂𝒍 + 𝟎. 𝟎𝟔𝟔 𝑮𝒐𝒍𝒅
+ 𝝐
2. The model has adjusted R square of 0.456, therefore it can explain 45.6% of the variation
occurs in the IHSG returns while the other 54.4% variation might be explained another
variable that not be mentioned in this research.
3. With confidence level of 95%, partially: return of DJIA, STI, and Crude Oil significantly
affect returns of IHSG within period of 2009-2018. Meanwhile the return of NIKKEI,
Hand Seng, Coal, and Gold has no significant effect partially to the IHSG return.
4. The returns of NIKKEI, Hang Seng, and Crude Oil have negative effect to the IHSG
returns while DJIA, STI, Coal, and Gold have positive correlation to the IHSG returns
within period of 2009-2018.
5. The return of STI is the most dominant factor (variable) influences the IHSG returns in
the period of 2009-2018 since it has the highest regression coefficient among other
variables (most influencing among others), while NIKKEI is to least dominant factor.
Therefore, the implication of this study is that we can take into account the global stock indices
return and global commodities return as consideration to predict the return and to invest in IHSG
because they have impact to the return of IHSG.
References
Adam, P., Rianse, U., Cahyono, E., & Rahim, M. (2015). Modelling of the Dynamics
Relationship between World Crude oil prices and the Stock Market in Indonesia.
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Vol 5, No 2, 550-557.
Ono, S. (2011). Oil Price Shocks and Stock Markets in BRICs. European Journal of Comparative
Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 8(1), 29-45.
Sahu, T. N., Bandopadhyay, K., & Modal, D. (2014). An empirical study on the dynamic
relationship between oil prices and Indian stock market. Managerial Finance, Vol. 40 Issue:
2, 200-215.
42
Copyright © 2019 ACADEMIA INDUSTRY NETWORKS-All rights reserved