Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Man is “Body and soul” Slippery Slope when something happens,

“We are only trapped in a body” (illusion) you automatically assume something will
all according to Pluto happen
Appeal to Authority appealing to authority
Socrates: “know thyself” (discover truth Middle Ground/In Between not choosing
within us) between two extreme truths, settling on
Aristotle: “man is social animal” middle
Descartes: tried to prove if man is real, Appeal to Crowd/People (ad populum)
doubted everything. Believed he is the only using majority
one real. Did not identify what was real and
what was not Body is bad, existence, what body senses
St. Agustin: “we can only achieve happiness Soul is good, essence, mind, ability to think
(reality) if we are one with God” and rationalize
God is not who we say/think he/she/it is
Essence and existence define our whole
Death is greatest equalizer phenomena
Subject have the ability to define things
(instinct) Human being “I”, ego, essence and
Object things/beings that don’t have ability existence, focus on only self
to define Human Person relationships of others and
Soul spiritually: leaves body after death you (ex: mother and child)
Philosophically: it is 1. Essence, 2. Mind Human Being & Human Person always
Body is ever-changing, existence together, same

Soul anima (consciousness = mind)


Fallacies Spirituality believes soul goes out and
Something that weakens an argument roams around
Ad Hominem attacking person instead of Philosophy soul is essence and cannot be
the argument changed
Appeal to Emotion (ad Misericordiam) Man good in nature
appealing to emotions/energy of crowd Human God’s greatest creation
instead of being logical
Appeal to Nature appealing that something Rene Descartes always doubting, “cogito
natural is right, correct ergo sum” (I think therefore I am), “I”
Black or White giving only 2 choices Thinking, doubting, existing
Anecdotal misleading an argument through Believes he is only subject, others are
giving a personal story instead of going objects
within the premises
Strawman oversimplifying/misinterpreting Animals have no souls because they don’t
argument so it would be easier to attack have ability to rationalize, have no essence
Ambiguity use of double
meaning/ambiguities of the language to In a spiritual perspective souls are life from
mislead God, to God
Morality is either: Matthew Heidigger ontology (study of
Deontological (value-on it’s own) being). Attempted to access being (stein) by
Teleological (value-end/goal) analysis of human existence (Dasein)
Michael Buber: I thou (person to person)
(subject to subject)
Suicide immoral, against 5th commandment
Anthropocentrism man is center & natural law, escape social responsibility,
(anthropology is study of humans) un-natural
Panthropocentrism animal in center
Biocentrism living beings (things) Anxiety is a response and/or the
Holism the whole nervousness towards an imprecise or
unknown threat, while Fear is a response to
Deontological Immanuel Kant a definite threat, or nervousness to a certain
World is made of phenomenas threat. They are both responses to danger;
Our mind can conceive however, anxiety is from an imagined threat
2 faculties mind: while fear is real.
 a priori pure reason, imagination
 a posteriori experience
Teleological telos (goal, result, ending)
Example: Utilitarianism highest good
(happiness)
Bonum is highest good
Jummun
* suma greatest
* magna highest
* Laude praise/honor
* cum with

Death end of life/all/world, greatest


equalizer, new start, happiness
The ceasing of respiratory, circulatory,
neurons, etc. system

We do good because it is our responsibility

Friedrich Nietzche nihilism pathetic, doesn’t


care, existentialism question existence:
“who am I?”, said God is dead

Sigmund Freud everything leads to


destruction, pleasure (sexual)

Вам также может понравиться