Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
30 30 29.4
28
25 25
24
22.48 23
22
Percent ROE
21 20.3
20 20
19 18.32 18.2
18 18 18
17 17.1
16 15.515.515.5 15.515.515.5 15.515.5 16 15.8 15.24
15 14.513.7514 15 15 14.64
14 14 14 13.7613.7 14.03
12 11.64
10 10 10 10.5 11 10.5 10
11 11 10.3
9 9
Threat of Entry
Competitive
Rivalry Buyer Power
Supplier Power
Substitutes
Barriers to Entry
3
Competitive Rivalry
Exit Barriers
Low High
Entry Barriers
High, stable High, risky
High returns returns
Power of Buyers
• Relative concentration
• Few vs many customers facing few vs many sellers
• Purchase volume as % of focal industry output
• Large vs small purchase decisions
• Availability of substitute products
• Buyer industry substitutes
• Threat of forward/backward integration
• Ability of focal industry or buyer industry to become a
competitor
• Switching costs
• Threat of switching suppliers
6
Power of Suppliers
• Relative concentration
• Few vs many sellers facing few vs many buyers
• Purchase volume as % of supplier industry output
• Large vs small purchase decisions
• Availability of substitute products
• Supplier industry substitutes
• Threat of backward integration
• Ability of focal industry to become a competitor
• Switching costs
• Threat of switching suppliers
Power of Substitutes
Focal Industry
Direct substitution
A
Other with same
Industry functionality
C D – diesel vs gas engines
B
Eliminating need for
product
– water meters vs flat rate
Customers
Reduce product
usage
Strategic Implications of
Industry Analysis
9
Weaknesses of Porter’s model
10
Industry
Competitive Opportunities • Analyze industry structure
Analysis • Create product/market
positioning
Create
sustainable
STRATEGY competitive
advantage
11