Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Supplement to Textbook
While every possible care has been taken in preparing this book, Icfai welcomes suggestions
from students for improvement in future editions.
ii
SUPPLEMENT TO OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
(Ref. No. of Supplement: SOM - 03 2K7 35)
y
NOTE:
• The 1st Edition of the Operations Management textbook (Ref. No.: OM - 052K3 35 or OM - 09 2K3 35) should be read
op
along with this supplement (Ref. No.: SOM – 03 2K7 35).
• The 1st Edition of the textbook, along with this supplement, is equivalent to the 2nd Edition of the Operations
Management textbook (Ref. No.: OM – 03 2K7 35).
tC
• H1, H2, H3 refers to first level, second level and third level headings in the text book.
No
Chapter 2 Operations Strategy ! Financial and Economic None
Analysis in Operations (H1)
Chapter 3 Forecasting Demand ! Forecast Components (H1) ! Simple moving average (SMA) (H3)
Chapter 4 Allocating Resources to Strategic ! Corrections in the 1st ! Graphical method (H2)
Alternatives Edition (Errata)
iii
CHAPTER TITLE TEXT ADDED PROBLEMS ADDED
y
Chapter 6 Facility Location and Layout ! Steps in assembly line ! Cost-Profit-Volume or Break-Even
balancing (H3) Analysis (H2)
op
! Corrections in the 1st
Edition (Errata)
tC
Chapter 8 Work Measurement (Chapter 11 in 1st None None
Edition)
Chapter 9 Aggregate Planning and Capacity ! Measuring capacity (H2) ! Varying the size of inventory (H3)
No
Planning ! Determining capacity ! Make-to-order items (H3)
st
(Chapter 7 in the 1 Edition) requirements (H2)
Chapter 10 Fundamentals of Inventory Control ! Inventory Classification ! Optimal Order Quantity (H2)
Do
st
(Chapter 8 in the 1 Edition) Models (H1)
iv
CHAPTER TITLE TEXT ADDED PROBLEMS ADDED
y
Offsetting (H3)
st
Demand - in the 1 Edition)
op
Chapter 14 Operations Scheduling (Chapter 17 in the ! Scheduling Consecutive ! Backward Scheduling (H2)
st
1 Edition) Days Off (H2) ! Johnson’s rule for n-jobs and m-
! Scheduling Daily Work machines (H2)
tC
Times (H2) ! Critical Ratio Method (H2)
! Scheduling Hourly Work
Times (H2)
No
Chapter 16 Supply Chain Management None None
Chapter 18 Productivity and Quality Management ! Productivity (H1) ! Control charts for variables (H2)
Do
(Chapter 19: Quality Management in the ! Control charts for variables ! Control charts for attributes (H2)
st
1 Edition) (H2)
v
CHAPTER TITLE TEXT ADDED PROBLEMS ADDED
Chapter 19 Facilities and Maintenance Management ! Facilities Management (H1) ! Evaluation of Preventive Maintenance
(Chapter 20 in the 1st Edition)
y
! Maintenance Planning (H1) Policies (H1)
Chapter 20 Project Management (Chapter 21 in the 1st None ! Computation of latest times: backward
op
Edition) pass (H3)
! PERT (H2)
tC
st
(Chapter 12 in the 1 Edition)
No
Do
vi
Contents
Supplement to Textbook
Operations Strategy 1-2
vii
Operations Strategy
• Operations Strategy as a Competitive Weapon
• Elements of Operations Strategy
• Developing an Operations Strategy
• Financial and Economic Analysis in Operations (New)
Payback Method
One of the basic methods used to compare investment alternatives is by calculating
the payback period for each investment alternative. The payback period is the time
taken (usually in years) to recover the initial investment. The payback takes into
consideration the initial investment and the resulting annual cash flow.
Mathematically the payback period is denoted by:
Net investment
Payback period =
Net annual income from investment
Where,
Payback period = Time taken to recover initial investment (usually in years)
Net Investment = purchase and installation costs minus its anticipated future salvage
value
Net Annual income = Anticipated annual revenue minus expenses
In spite of its popularity, the payback method has a few inherent drawbacks - it
ignores cash flow beyond the payback period, and does not take into account the time
value of money. These deficiencies are overcome in the net present value method.
Operations Management
For example, let us calculate the payback period for a project with an initial
investment of Rs 10 lakh that is expected to generate an income of Rs 2 lakh per
annum. The payback period or the time taken to recover the initial investment can be
calculated using the formula given below
10 lakh (Net Investment)
Payback =
2 lakh (expected annual income)
When a firm needs to decide on a particular investment from various alternatives, the
payback period for each investment alternative is calculated. The alternative with the
shortest payback period is preferred.
CF
n
i
NPV = ∑ −I
i =1 (1 − r) i
CFi = the cash flow at time i
r = discount rate
t = time horizon
I = Initial investment
If the net present value of an investment is greater then one then the project is
acceptable. If the net present value is less than zero, the project is rejected. The greater
the NPV value of the project the better is its profitability. Incase, where multiple
projects are compared the project alternative with the largest NPV is selected.
Suppose the net present value of a project is calculated as Rs 1lakh, this implies that
undertaking the project is expected to increase the value of the firm by Rs 1 lakh.
NPV is a useful method for comparing investment alternatives, with comparable
initial investments.
2
Forecasting Demand
• Forecasting in Operations
• Forecast Components (New)
• Demand Forecasting Process (New)
• Forecasting Methods (Modified)
• Selecting a Forecasting Method
• Measures of Forecasting Accuracy
• Monitoring and Controlling Forecasts
[
FORECAST COMPONENTS
end customers and/or for the distributors and retailers. Their impact on the forecast
also depends on their regularity. A regular promotion is run at the same time every
year. Discount sale by a refrigerator manufacturer during the lean season can be an
example here. The regular promotion component can be termed as seasonal
component from the forecasting perspective. Irregular promotions are those
promotions which are run as per the market conditions and do not have a specific time
frame. Such promotions need to be monitored carefully and considered separately.
Unlike other forecasting components, the promotional component is controllable by
the firm.
Irregular component: The irregular component refers to all those variations in
demand that cannot be attributed to any of the above five factors. This factor is
difficult to predict because of its random nature. Any forecasting exercise involves
efforts to reduce the impact of this component by accurately monitoring and
predicting the other components.
Exhibit 3.1
Collaborative Forecasting
To fully realize the benefits of forecasting, the different departments of an organization should
integrate their forecasting objectives. Separate forecasting methods, technologies and objectives for
each functional department (like finance, marketing, sales and production) can lead to a waste of
resources, missed opportunities, etc. due to multiple forecasts. An organization can improve its
overall forecast by adopting a collaborative approach. Collaborative forecasting involves the
synchronization of the different forecasting objectives and systems employed by various functional
entities.
An organizational forecasting system should contain a central database that gathers information
from enterprise systems like ERP, SCM, and CRM. These systems do not have an in-built
functionality that caters to the requirements of collaborative forecasting. In order to obtain a single
forecast that meets the needs of all the departments, information from these systems should be
utilized to generate a forecast that meets the overall requirements of the organization and its
different functions. In order to ensure that the single forecast takes into account the specific
requirements of different departments or functions, a consensus methodology is used.
According to the Gartner Group, “Enterprises that collaboratively integrate disparate forecasting
systems will improve revenue predictability by 10% to 25% and decrease inventory carrying costs
by more than 30% over a three year period.”
Adapted from Michael J Hennel, “Forecasting Demand Begins with Integration” B to B, 11/11/2002,
Vol. 87 Issue 11, p9, 1p.
at a consensus about the forecast for the promotion period and decide upon a common
action plan. If the members are not able to plan jointly, then mismatches between the
demand and supply would arise at various levels of the supply chain. This could also
result in logistics problems since transporters and warehouse operators would not have
timely access to the promotion plan, resulting in a shortage of transportation vehicles
and/or warehouse space to meet the increasing customer demand.
5
Operations Management
FORECASTING METHODS
Time-Series Methods
(Added under ‘Time Series Methods’ in page 23 of the first edition)
Time-series forecasting methods assume that past data is a good indicator of the
future. Instances where this assumption is not true are rare and not significant enough.
Some relevant data can always be found. Hence, many operations managers use a time
series model to forecast the demand for their goods or services.
Time series is a widely used forecasting method, largely because it is simple and
inexpensive to use. Forecasts obtained from this method can be a good basis for
further analysis. The term 'time series' refers to a collection of well-defined data,
which is obtained through repeated measurement over a period of time. Weekly or
monthly sales at each retail outlet of a company would qualify under this definition.
The collected data is said to be well defined because it is collected at regular time
intervals. Thus, data collected randomly or irregularly cannot be called as a time
series.
Time series analysis can be categorized into two broad categories, based on the
complexity involved: static and adaptive.
6
Forecasting Demand
7
Operations Management
111 27.75
II 22 28.375 77.53%
116 29
III 18 29.25 61.54%
118 29.5
IV 33 30.375 108.64%
2001 125 31.25
I 45 30.75 146.34%
121 30.25
II 29 29.875 97.07%
118 29.5
III 14 29 48.28%
114 28.5
IV 30 28.125 106.67%
2002 111 27.75
I 41 28.25 145.13%
115 28.75
II 26 28.625 90.83%
114 28.5
III 18
IV 29
Step 2: Then the 4-quarter moving average is calculated. This is obtained by dividing
the values of moving totals (obtained in column four of Table 3.3) by four. So moving
average of first set of values is 110/4 = 27.5. Similarly, moving averages are
calculated for the rest of the values in column four of Table 3.3. These values are
shown in column five of Table 3.3.
Step 3: Then the moving averages are centered. The moving averages in column five
fall halfway between the quarters of each year. Average of two four-quarter moving
averages falling just above and below the quarter is calculated to center out the
averages. For quarter-III of 1998, the resulting four-quarter centered moving average
is 27.25. This was obtained by taking average of two moving averages i.e. (27.5 +
27)/2 = 27.25. Similarly, the other values of column five of Table 3.3 are centered out
which are shown in column six of Table 3.3. (Step 3 is not required if the number of
values is odd as the values will be centered out in the step 2 itself.)
Step 4: For each quarter which is having a 4-quarter centered out moving average, the
percentage of actual value to the moving average is calculated. The step is performed
to regain the seasonal component of the quarters. The percentage is obtained by
dividing the actual quarter value with each associated 4-quarter centered moving
average value. Then the resulting value is multiplied by 100.
Therefore, for quarter III of 1998, the value is (15/27.25) × 100 = 55.05%. Similarly,
other values are calculated and shown in column seven of Table 3.3.
8
Forecasting Demand
Step 5: The values obtained in column seven are arranged by quarter (as shown in
Table 3.4), and the modified mean is calculated. The modified mean is obtained by
removing the highest and lowest values for each quarter and taking average of the
remaining values.
For example, for quarter I, the highest and lowest values are 158.53 and 140.74
respectively. By canceling these and totaling the remaining values we get the modified
sum as 291.47. Then, the modified mean of quarter I is 291.47/2 = 145.74
Similarly for quarter II, the highest and lowest values are 98.11 and 77.53
respectively. By canceling and totaling the remaining values we get the modified sum
as 187.9. Thus modified mean of quarter II is 187.9/2 = 93.95
Table 3.4: Calculating Modified Mean
Year Quarter I Quarter II Quarter III Quarter IV
1998 -- -- 55.05 110.60
1999 140.74 98.11 48.37 103.70
2000 158.53 77.53 61.54 108.64
2001 146.34 97.07 48.28 106.67
2002 145.13 90.83 -- --
Modified sum 291.47 187.90 103.42 215.31
Modified mean 145.74 93.95 51.71 107.65
By removing the highest and lowest values for each quarter, the extreme irregular
variations are removed. By averaging the rest of the values, the time series is further
smoothed. Thus the modified mean represents the seasonality component.
Step 6: In the final step, the modified mean is further adjusted to obtain the seasonal
index.
From Table 3.4, the total of 4 indices = 145.74 + 93.95 + 51.71 + 107.65 = 399.
But 100 is the base for the index. Hence the total of four quarterly indices should be
400, and mean of the indices needs to be 100. In order to rectify the error, the seasonal
indices are adjusted by multiplying each index by an adjusting constant. The adjusting
constant is obtained by dividing the desired index total i.e. 400 by actual total of 399.
The value obtained is 400/399 = 1.0025.
The process of adjusting the modified mean and obtaining seasonal index is shown in
Table 3.5.
Table 3.5: The Calculation of Seasonal Indices
Quarter Index Adjusting Seasonal Index
(1) (2) constant (3) (4) = (2) x (3)
I 145.74 1.0025 146.10
II 93.95 1.0025 94.18
III 51.71 1.0025 51.83
IV 107.65 1.0025 107.92
Seasonal indices for different quarters are shown in the column four of Table 3.5. The
next step is calculating the deseasonalized time series values. To obtain
deseasonalized time series values, the actual sales values are divided by the resultant
value achieved by dividing corresponding seasonal indices with 100. Deseasonalized
sales are calculated for various quarters in Table 3.6
9
Operations Management
∑ y = 567.2 ∑ xy = ∑x 2
=
206.58 2,660
The idea behind this exercise is to eliminate the need for squaring large numbers like
year 2000, 2001. By setting the mean as zero, the calculations are simplified to a great
extent. Suppose we are dealing with three time points - year 2000, 2001 and 2002. We
assign the codes -1, 0, 1 to the respective years, where zero represents the mean (year
2001), -1 represents the last or previous year (2000) and 1 represents the next year
(2002). This translation process will differ depending upon the number of time
periods. If the problem consists of an odd number of time periods, the mean can be
easily found out. For instance, if there are 7 time points, then the mean would be the
middle of the time points i.e. 4. However, if the time points are even in number, then
the mean would contain a ‘½ fraction,’ which if subtracted from each time point,
would make the calculations cumbersome. To overcome this problem, each time
variable is multiplied with 2. The coded variable is denoted by x. In this problem, the
time points are 20, the mean is 9½ which falls between the II quarter and III quarter of
2001. The first value i.e., Quarter I of 1998 is assigned as -9½ and the last value i.e.
quarter IV of 2002 is assigned as 9½. The translating time variable is shown in
column four of Table 3.7, and the coded time points, which are obtained by
multiplying the translating variables with two, are shown in column five of Table 3.7.
Now using the least squares method, trend component is developed. The trend
component is obtained using the equation:
11
Operations Management
∧
y = a + bx -----------Equ 3.1
∧
Where y = estimated value of the dependent variable
x = independent variable (time in trend analysis)
By substituting the values of xy, x2, y and n, the values of a and b are 28.36 and
0.08 respectively.
∧
Therefore, y = 28.36 + 0.08x ------------------Equ 3.2
∧
Now, various values of x can by substituted in Equ 3.1 and the estimated values of y
for each value of x. The calculation is shown in Table 3.8.
Making the forecast
The final step in the static forecasting method is to forecast the demand for future
periods. The following steps are followed in forecasting the demand.
Step 1: Calculate the trend level for the periods for which forecast needs to be made
using the trend equation.
Step 2: Next step is to multiply the trend level from Step 1 with the period seasonal
index to include seasonal effects.
Step 3: Then multiply the result of Step 2 by the projected cyclic index to include
cyclic effects and get the final forecast result.
Suppose the firm wants to forecast for all the four quarters of year 2003.
First, all the four quarters of year 2003 need to be coded. The coded value after
multiplying by two for the last quarter (IV) of 2002 is 19. Looking at the trend in
Table 3.7, it can be easily estimated that the coded time variable for the four quarters
of 2003 will be 21, 23, 25 and 27 respectively.
∧
Substituting these values in Equ 3.2, we get y for I, II, III and IV quarter of 2003 is
30.04, 30.2, 30.36 and 30.52 respectively.
Next step is to calculate the seasonalized estimates by multiplying the deseasonalized
sales estimates with the respective seasonal indices and expressing them as a fraction
of 100. Seasonal indices for the four quarters are shown in Table 3.5.
Seasonalized estimates for quarter I of 2003: 30.04 × (146.1/100) = 43.89
Seasonalized estimates for quarter II of 2003: 30.2 × (94.18/100) = 28.44
Seasonalized estimates for quarter III of 2003: 30.36 × (51.83/100) = 15.72
Seasonalized estimates for quarter IV of 2003: 30.52 × (107.92/100) = 32.94
12
Forecasting Demand
Adaptive forecasting
Adaptive forecasting is an advanced form of time series analysis, where the trend and
seasonal components are adjusted after each demand observation.
There are three widely used adaptive forecasting methods. They are simple moving
average, weighted moving average, and exponential smoothing.
FORECASTING METHODS
Months Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Demand (in lakhs) 53 53 56 57 58 56 58 58 60 61 59 60
Solution
Using a six-month simple moving average technique, the forecast for the seventh
month can be calculated as the average of the first six months. Thus, the forecast for
July 2006 is the average demand of LCDs during January, February, March, April,
May, and June. Similarly, the forecast for January 2007 would be the average of the
demand during July, August, September, October, November, and December 2006.
Forecast for January 2007 = (58 + 58 + 60 + 61 + 59 + 60) / 6 = 356/6 = 59.3 lakhs
Thus, by using moving averages for six months, we obtain the demand for the month
of January 2007 as 59.3 lakhs.
FORECASTING METHODS
FORECASTING METHODS
Trend adjusted exponential smoothing (double smoothing)
(Added under ‘Trend adjusted exponential smoothing (double smoothing)’
in Pg 27 of the first edition)
Problem
Hansa Cycles Ltd. manufactures cycles of different models for children, men, and
women. The sales for its high-end sports model for children averaged 2500 units for
the last 3 years. The average increase in sales was 100 units per year for the model.
Last year, 2650 units were sold. Forecast the sales for this year, using the trend
14
Forecasting Demand
FORECASTING METHODS
Causal Quantitative Models
Least square method
(Added under ‘Least square method’ in page 29 of the first edition)
Problem
A firm would like to forecast the cost of raw materials needed to manufacture 50,000
units of product A. Help the firm calculate the cost of raw materials using regression
analysis. The production for the last three years and the corresponding costs of raw
materials are given in the following table. Here, sample size ‘n’ = 3.
Product A (in `000) 40 44 48
Cost of Raw Materials (in Rs.`000) 12 13 16
Solution
Let us first calculate the values of ‘a’ and ‘b’ using the least square method. Consider
production units as X and cost of raw materials as Y.
X (in `000) Y (in Rs.`000) XY X2 Y2
40 12 480 1600 144
44 13 572 1936 169
48 16 768 2304 256
132 41 1820 5840 569
∑X
X = n = 132 / 3 = 44 (n =3)
15
Operations Management
∑Y
Y = n = 41 / 3 = 13.67
n( ∑ XY) − ( ∑ X)( ∑ Y)
b=
n ( ∑ X 2 ) - (∑ X) 2
Now, substituting the values of ∑XY, ∑X2, and ∑Y2 from the table, we get
b = 3(1820) – [(132)(41)] / (3(5840) – (132)(132))
b = (5460 – 5412) / (17520 – 17424)
b = 48/96
b = 0.5
Next, we calculate the value of constant ‘a’ using the equation:
a = Y − bX = 13.67 – 0.5(44)
a = -8.33
Substituting the values of ‘a’ and ‘b’ in the straight line equation, we can obtain the
value of the dependent variable on the basis of the independent variable. Then, we can
find the costs of raw materials required (dependent variable) for producing 50,000
units of product A.
Y = a + bX
Y = -8.33 + 0.5 × 50
Y = 16.67
Thus, for producing 50,000 units, the cost of raw materials would be Rs.16,670.
16
Allocating Resources to
Strategic Alternatives
• Allocation Decisions in Operations Strategy
• Linear Programming in Operations Management
• Formulation of Linear Programming Problems
• Solution of Linear Programming Problems (Modified)
• The Transportation Problem in Linear Programming
Graphical Method
Added under ‘Graphical Method’ in page 45 of the first edition)
Problem
The plant manager of a plastic pipe manufacturer has the opportunity of using two
different routings for a particular type of plastic pipe. Routing 1 uses Extruder A and
routing 2 uses Extruder B. Both the routings require the same melting process. The
following table shows the time requirements and capacities of these processes.
Time Requirements (hr/100ft)
Process Routing 1 Routing 2 Capacity (hr)
Melting 1 1 45
Extruder A 1 0 80
Extruder B 0 1 120
Each 100ft of pipe processed on routing 1 uses 3kg of raw material, whereas that on
routing 2 uses 2kg of raw material. The difference results from differing scrap rates of
the extruding machines. Consequently, the profit per 100ft of pipe processed on
routing 1 is Rs.300 and on routing 2 is Rs.400. A total of 180 kg of raw material is
available.
a. Create a set of linear equations to describe the objective function and the
constraints.
b. Use graphic analysis to find the visual solution
c. What is the maximum profit?
Solution
a) As the objective is to maximize profit, the objective function for this problem
would be
Max Z = 300x + 400y
where x and y are decision variables representing the length of pipe produced using
routing 1 and routing 2 respectively.
In the melting process, a maximum of 45 hrs is available for both the routings. Hence,
Operations Management
x(1) + y(1) ≤ 45
x + y ≤ 45
In routing 1, Extruder A can use a maximum of 80hrs, which means
x(1) + y(0) ≤ 80
x ≤ 80
Similarly, in routing 2, Extruder B can use a maximum of 120 hrs leading to
x(0) + y(1) ≤ 120
y ≤ 120
The available raw material is 200kg and routing 1 consumes 3kg while routing 2
consumes 2 kg for every 100ft. Thus, 3x + 2y ≤ 180
Hence, the objective function is Max Z = 300x + 400y
The constraints are
x + y ≤ 45
x ≤ 80
y ≤ 120
3x + 2y ≤ 180
where, x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0
b) To get the visual solution, the data has to be plotted on a graph. To plot the graph,
the inequalities in the constraints have to be converted into equalities.
Thus,
x + y = 45
x = 80
y = 120
3x + 2y = 180
In x + y = 45, when x = 0, y = 45 and when y = 0, x = 45
In 3x + 2y = 180, when x = 0, y = 90, and when y = 0, x = 60
c) To find the maximum profit, the coordinates of the corner points of the feasible
region have to be substituted in the objective function.
Corner point A (0,100) Æ 300 x 0 + 400 x100 = 40,000
Corner point B (60,0) Æ 300 x 60 + 400 x 0 = 18,000
Corner point C (80,0) Æ 300 x 80 + 400 x 0 = 24,000
Corner point S (80,120) Æ 300 x 80 + 400 x 120 = 24,000 + 48,000 = 72,000
Corner point D (0, 100) Æ 300 x 0 + 400 x 100 = 40,000
Hence, Corner point S gives the maximum profit of Rs.72,000.
18
Allocating Resources to Strategic Alternatives
x = 80
D
y=120
120
S
60
40 x + y = 45
20
B C
O (0,0) 40 60 100 120
20 80 X
ERRATA
Graphical Method
In Figure 4.1 in page 44 of the first edition, the optimum solution at the point
B was not correctly represented.
The graphical method explains the process of obtaining a solution of a linear
programming problem in a simple way. The procedure can be explained in the
following steps:
Step 1: Formulate the linear programming problem by identifying the decision
variables, the objective function and the constraints.
Step 2: Convert the inequality constraints to their equalities and plot them on a graph
(in linear form).
Step 3: Using the inequalities in each constraint, determine the feasible region.
Step 4: Write down the corner points of the solution area. Substitute the values in the
objective function. The optimum solution is obtained at any of these points.
The feasible solution area for the problem formulated in the Table 4.3 is shown as
OABC in the Figure 4.1. From the figure, we can understand that the optimum
solution is at the point (2000/3, 5000/3).
19
Operations Management
20
Facility Location and Layout
• Importance of Location
• Factors Affecting the Location Decisions
• General Steps in Location Selection and Location Decision Process
• Location Evaluation Methods (Modified)
• Facility Layout
• Basic Layout Formats
• Developing a Process layout
• Developing a Product Layout (Modified)
• Developing a Cellular Manufacturing Layout
• Japanese Approaches and Trends in Manufacturing Layouts
• Service Facility Layouts
From these calculations, it is clear that Gurgaon will the more profitable location to
set up the new plant for producing 9000 motors per year.
Note:
• When there is no feasible (remaining) task for the same station, move on to the
next station.
• When there is exactly one feasible remaining task for the same station, assign it
as the next task for the same station.
• When there are multiple feasible remaining tasks for the same station, use the
following tiebreaker rules to shortlist/select the next task for the same station.
b) Shortlist the tasks with most followers, among the feasible (remaining) tasks for the
same station:
22
Facility Location and Layout
From the feasible (remaining) tasks for the same station, shortlist the task(s) which
has (have) the most followers.
c) Select the task with the longest operation time:
From the shortlisted tasks with most followers, select the task which has the longest
operation time, and assign it as the next task for the same station.
Sometimes, there may be multiple such tasks. In this case, one of these tasks with the
longest operation time can be (arbitrarily) assigned as the next task for the same
station.
iv. This set of rules is applied iteratively till all the tasks are assigned. At the end of
this process, the actual number of work stations (Na) required may be greater than or
equal to the theoretical number of work stations (Nt).
The efficiency of the balance is calculated by using the following formula.
T
Efficiency =
Na ×C
Where, T = Sum of task times
Na = Actual number of workstations
C = Cycle time
v. The balance is accepted if the efficiency is satisfactory, otherwise balancing is done
using a different decision rule.
ERRATA
LOCATION EVALUATION METHODS
Cost-Profit-Volume or Break-Even Analysis
In the Figure 6.1 in page 81 of the first edition, TCA (total cost at location
A) and TCB (total cost at location B) were incorrectly represented.
Figure 6.2: Higher Cost Locations Providing Higher Profits
23
Operations Management
Line Balancing
Steps in assembly line balancing
(Problem 3 in page 91 of the first edition has been reworked as follows)
Problem
The desired daily output for an assembly line is 500 units. The assembly line operates
for a period of 420 minutes a day. The process involves the tasks A, B, C, D, E, F, G,
H, I, J and K. Balance the assembly line and calculate the cycle time and efficiency of
the assembly line.
Task Task Time (seconds) Tasks that must precede
A 45 -
B 11 A
C 9 B
D 50 -
E 15 D
F 12 C
G 12 C
H 12 E
I 12 E
J 8 F,G,H,I
K 9 J
195
Solution
24
Facility Location and Layout
Following is the precedence diagram of all the tasks. The time required (in seconds)
for completion of each of the tasks is given below.
11 9 sec 12 sec
B C F
45 sec
A
G
12 sec 12
sec
J K
D E H
8 sec 9 sec
15 sec
50 sec
I
12 sec
Given that the operation time per day is 420 min, i.e. (420×60) sec.
The sum of the task times of the process, T
= (45 + 11 + 9 +50 + 15 + 12 + 12 +12 + 12 + 8 + 9)
= 195 sec.
Operation time per day
Cycle time =
output per day
420 × 60
=
500
= 50.4 sec.
Theoretical minimum number of workstations required,
T 195
Nt = =
C 50.4
= 3.87
Therefore, a minimum of 4 workstations are required to balance the assembly line.
We arrange tasks in order of the largest number of following tasks.
25
Operations Management
J 1
K 0
Now, we assign tasks as shown in the table below, following the rules given below:
A) Identification of feasible (remaining) tasks for the same station:
From the unassigned tasks, identify the task(s) which can be assigned next to the same
station, subject to two constraints:
a. The precedence rules should not be violated.
b. The individual time required for each of these feasible (remaining) tasks should be
less than the unassigned time for the station, where
Unassigned time for a station = Cycle time – (Sum of the time required for all
previous tasks that have been assigned to the station)
Note:
When there is no feasible (remaining) task for the same station, move on to the next
station.
When there is exactly one feasible remaining task for the same station, assign it as the
next task for the same station.
When there are multiple feasible remaining tasks for the same station, use the
following tiebreaker rules to shortlist/select the next task for the same station.
B) Shortlist the tasks with most followers, among the feasible (remaining)
tasks for the same station:
From the feasible (remaining) tasks for the same station, shortlist the task(s) which
has (have) the most followers.
C) Select the task with the longest operation time:
From the shortlisted tasks with most followers, select the task which has the longest
operation time, and assign it as the next task for the same station.
Sometimes, there may be multiple such tasks. In this case, one of these tasks with the
longest operation time can be (arbitrarily) assigned as the next task for the same
station.
Application of the above rules for balancing the assembly line given in the
problem:
To begin with, no tasks are assigned to any station. So, the unassigned time for Station
1 is 50.4 seconds. Subject to the precedence rules and the time constraints, A or D can
be considered as the feasible remaining tasks. Since A has the most followers, we
assign Task A to Station 1, as shown below.
26
Facility Location and Layout
Station Task Time Unassigned Feasible remaining Task with Task with
Time tasks (for the same most longest
station) followers operation
time
Station 1 - 0 50.4 A, D A A
Station 1 A 45 5.4 None None None
Now, the unassigned time for Station 1 is only 5.4 seconds and neither of the potential
next task (B or D) can be assigned next to this station, because of the time constraint.
So we move on to Station 2. Following the same rules described above, the entire
table can be filled as shown below.
Station Task Time Unassigned Feasible Task with Task with
Time remaining tasks most longest
(for the same followers operation
station) time
Station 1 - 0 50.4 A, D A A
A 45 5.4 None None None
Station 2 - 0 50.4 B, D B, D D
D 50 0.4 None None None
Station 3 - 0 50.4 B, E B B
B 11 39.4 C,E C,E E
E 15 24.4 C,H,I C C
C 9 15.4 F,G,H,I F,G,H,I F,G,H,I
F 12 3.4 None None None
Station 4 - 0 50.4 G,H,I G,H,I G,H,I
G 12 38.4 H,I,J H,I H,I
H 12 26.4 I,J I I
I 12 14.4 J J J
J 8 6.4 None None None
#
Station 5 - 0 50.4 K K K
K 9 41.4 All tasks have been assigned.
# The last task (Task K) could not be assigned to Station 4, since the unassigned time
(6.4 seconds) was less than the time required for Task K. So, we need a fifth
workstation to perform Task K.
Therefore, actual number of workstations, Na = 5
T
Efficiency of the assembly line =
NaC
195
= = 0.77
5 × 50.4
27
Aggregate Planning and
Capacity Planning
• Overview of Planning Activities
• The Aggregate Planning Process
• Strategies for Developing Aggregate Plans (Modified)
• Aggregate Planning Techniques
• Master Production Schedule (Modified)
• Implementing Aggregate Plans and Master Schedules
• Capacity Planning (Modified)
29
Operations Management
CAPACITY PLANNING
30
Aggregate Planning and Capacity Planning
The capacity utilization rate measures the capacity level at which a production process
is operating.
Capacity used
Capacity utilization rate = × 100
Capacity avaialable
Capacity available indicates the capacity level for which the process is designed (i.e.
designed capacity). Capacity utilization rate is measured in percentage terms.
Determining Capacity Requirements
Future capacity requirements need to be accurately determined to ensure good
performance in the future. Required capacity is determined on the basis of the
specifications of individual product lines, production capabilities in existing facilities,
etc.
The steps for determining capacity requirements are as follows:
1. Employ forecasting methods and find the individual product demand within the
planning horizon.
2. Identify the equipment and human resource requirements to meet the forecasted
demand. In case of multiple products or services, identify the time required for
switching from one product or service to another.
3. Compare capacity required with available capacity for the required time period
and identify the gaps.
4. As determining exact capacity requirements is difficult, organizations in general
allocate extra capacity to meet any contingencies in the future. The extra capacity
allocated for uncertain future requirements is known as the capacity cushion.
Economies of Scale
The basic theory behind the economies of scale is that as the size of an operation
increases, per unit cost of production decreases. The reasons include decrease in the
fixed costs of production per unit of output, and adoption of efficient process and
technologies like automation, which are not economically feasible for small-scale
operations. But when the firm expands beyond a point, diseconomies of scale become
apparent, because the expenditure incurred for maintaining large operations becomes
uneconomical.
Economies Diseconomies
Average unit of scale of scale
cost of
output (Rs.)
O
Production volume (units)
31
Operations Management
The reasons for diseconomies include increased distribution and storage costs,
complexities in operations, and high costs of modification and replacement of existing
facilities. So, an organization has to determine capacity required to achieve economies
of scale. In Figure 9.6, the relationship between the production level and the average
unit cost is shown. The resulting economies/diseconomies of scale are apparent. Point
O shows the optimum level of output where an organization can take full advantage of
economies of scales without facing diseconomies of scale.
Planning Service Capacity
In a service organization, planning for capacity should take into consideration when
and where the capacity is needed. Services can neither be produced in anticipation of
demand nor stored as inventories. The service capacity should be located near the
customers because most service delivery process involves customers. Unlike
manufacturing organizations, a service organization based in one geographical
location usually cannot efficiently serve customers in other geographical area. As a
result, service organizations generally operate through branches or franchises because
of the nature of the services, which involves customer participation in the service
delivery process. As customers cannot come to single location to avail services,
services organizations tend to increase capacity by establishing new branches and
facilities. There are few exceptions to these rules; many educational institutions,
hospitals, holiday resorts, etc. tend to concentrate on increasing capacities in one
location itself. Further with the expansion of the Internet, many retailers are taking up
the option of providing service online from a single location rather than establishing
brick and mortar outlets.
32
Fundamentals of
Inventory Control
• Purpose of Inventories
• Inventory Costs
• Inventory Systems
• Economic Order Quantity Model (Modified)
• Inventory Classification Models (New)
2C o D 2 × 80 × 10000
EOQ= = = 400 units
Ch 10
So the optimal order quantity for the firm is 400 units. The firm would be able to
minimize total cost i.e. carrying and ordering cost if it orders in lots of 400 units.
(New Heading added after ‘Economic Quantity Order Model’ in page 126 of the
first edition)
To exercise proper control over the inventory items, organizations classify and
categorize these items. This classification allows operations managers in devising
control plans relevant and effective for items with similar attributes. These methods
are sometimes called selective control methods.
Operations Management
ABC Classification
ABC is one of the most widely used inventory classification models otherwise known
as “Always Better Control” model. As per ABC classification, items are classified on
the basis of their annual consumption value. In an organization, few items have
maximum turnover in terms of annual consumption or usage value. Annual usage
value of an item is given by the relationship
Annual usage value = annual requirement × per unit cost
Category ‘A’ includes items that account for approximately 10% of the total inventory
items and 75% of the inventory investment. These items need high level of control.
Category ‘B’ includes items that account for approximately 15% of total inventory
items and inventory investments.
Category ‘C’ includes items that account for approximately 75% of the total inventory
items with approximately 10% of the total inventory investment. The ABC
classification method is described in detail in Chapter 12.
VED Classification
VED classification is based on the importance of a particular item in the production
process. Under VED, the items, which are critical for production are classified as V
(vital), the items, which are important in the production process but not critical are
classified as E (essential) and the items, which consists of non essential and do not
influence the production process are classified as D (desirable). Items categorized as
V need maximum control and investment. V items may not be the most expensive but
are critical to the production process. ABC classification of items is based on the
annual usage value whereas VED method is based on the criticality of the item in the
production process.
FSND Classification
Under FSND classification, goods are classified on the basis of their turnover. F items
are fast moving, S items are slow moving and N items are non-moving items and D
items are dead or the items which have not been issued for few years. In most cases,
the items identified as D are normally sent for disposal. The classifications of items as
FSND are based on the number of issues or withdrawal of items from stores over a
period of time. This period is decided based on the kind of inventory a firm is holding.
Time period for the movement of inventory in a steel factory may be different from
that of an electronics firm.
34
Purchase Management
• Importance of Purchasing
• Organizing Purchasing
• Responsibilities of a Purchase Manager
• Purchasing Process
• Duties of Buyers
• Make-or-Buy Decisions (Modified)
• Ethics in Buying
MAKE-OR-BUY DECISIONS
(Added under ‘Make or buy Decisions’ in page 136 of the first edition)
Problem 1
Raj Metals can purchase brass plates for Rs.30 per unit or produce it in-house where
the associated fixed and variable costs are Rs.50,000 and Rs.20 respectively. If the
demand for this component is 5000 units per annum, ascertain whether it is
economical to make the product in-house rather than sourcing it.
Solution
Given:
Demand = 5000 units
F = Rs. 50,000
V = Rs. 20
P = Rs.30
Q = 5000
If the item is made in-house, the organization incurs a fixed cost, say F, on installing
the necessary equipment and facilities. It also incurs a variable production cost, which
is equal to the unit variable cost (V) times the number of units demanded (Q).
Total Cost to manufacture = (VQ) + F
= (23 x 5000) + 50000
= 115,000 + 50000 = 165,000
The total cost of buying is the product of price per unit (P) and the number of units
procured (Q), i.e. Total Cost if purchasing = P × Q
= 5000 x 30 = 150,000
As the cost to produce the item is more than the cost of purchasing it, it is not
economical for the company to produce the component in-house.
Problem 2
An automobile company plans to utilize its existing manufacturing facility to produce
gears that the company is now buying for Rs.250 per unit. If the company produces
the gears, it will incur materials costs of Rs.75, labor costs of Rs.100, and overhead
Operations Management
costs of Rs.25 per unit. The annual fixed cost associated with the unused capacity is
Rs.200,000. Demand over the next year is estimated at 25,000 units. Would it be
profitable for the company to make the gears?
Solution
Demand (Q) = 25,000 units
Variable cost (V) = material costs + labor costs + overhead costs
= 75 + 100 + 25
= 200
Fixed cost (F) = Rs. 200,000
Price per unit (P) = Rs. 250
Total cost to purchase = P × Q
= Rs.250 x 25000 = 6,250,000
Total cost to produce = Fixed cost + (Variable cost x demand)
= 200,000 + (200 x 25000)
= 200,000 + 5,000,000
= 5,200,000
As the total cost of producing the gears is less than the total cost of purchasing them
by Rs.10,50,000, the firm can produce the gears in-house.
36
Materials Management
• Necessity of Materials Management
• Functions of Materials Management
• Materials Management Technology
• Materials Management Techniques (Modified)
ERRATA
Kanban Systems
Figure 13.3 in page 183 of the first edition was incorrectly represented
A dual-card Kanban system
The dual-card Kanban system makes use of two Kanban cards. The two Kanbans are a
conveyance card and a vendor card. In a single-card Kanban system, we assume that
the required quantity of inventory is available in the inventory department. In the dual
card system, the required inventory is obtained from a vendor and a vendor
authorization Kanban is used in the transactions.
The functioning of a dual card system is shown in Figure 12.3 and can be described in
the following steps:
• The process of working of a conveyance card in this system is similar to that in
the single-card system. A conveyance Kanban is put in an empty tray at point A
and a material handling agent moves it to point B in the inventory department.
The tray is collected at point C and sent to point D in the assembling area similar
to the single card system.
• In this system, the vendor Kanban is introduced at point X, authorizing a vendor
(at point Y) to deliver the materials that are specified in the card.
• After receiving the card, the vendor delivers the materials into the empty trays
that are available at point Z.
• The filled container is placed in the bins at the position X. It remains at this
position till a conveyance card arrives from Point B to Point C, authorizing the
movement of material from Point C to Point D.
• Once the container is authorized to move, the vendor Kanban is removed and sent
to the vendor and cycle repeats itself
Operations Management
38
Materials Requirement Planning
• Fundamentals of Materials Requirement Planning
• Components of an MRP System (Modified)
• Advantages and Disadvantages of an MRP System
• Problems in Implementing MRP Systems
• Manufacturing Resource Planning
G (2)
F (1) G (3)
Solution
Quantity of A to be produced = 200 units
Quantity of D required to produce 200 units of A = 400 units
Available inventory of D = 100 units.
Quantity of D to be produced = 300 units
Operations Management
4 units of F are required to produce one unit of D. Hence, 1200 units are required to
produce 300 units of D.
Quantity of B required to produce 200 units of A = 600 units
Available inventory for B = 100 units
Quantity of B to be produced = 500 units
3 units of F are required to produce one unit of B. Hence, 1500 units are required to
produce 500 units of B.
For every unit of A, one unit of C is required and for every unit of C, two units of F
are required. Hence, for 200 units of C, 400 units of F are required.
The total quantity of F required to produce 200 units of A = 1200 + 1500 + 400 =
3100 units.
X
LT=2
Solution
From the given data, the MRP schedule for items P, Q, R, and S are as shown in the
table 13.3.
Here, the lead times for X = 2 weeks, P = 2 weeks, Q = 1 week, R = 1 week, and S = 2
weeks
Table 13.3: MRP Schedule for Item P, Q, R, and S
Week Number 1 2 3 4 5 6
Item: P Gross requirements 600
Quantity =2 Quantity on Hand 0
LT =2 Net requirements 600
40
Materials Requirement Planning
Week Number 1 2 3 4 5 6
Lot Size =1 Planned-order receipts 600
Planned-order releases 600
Item: R Gross requirements 1200
Quantity =2 Quantity on Hand 0
LT =1 Net requirements 1200
Lot Size =1 Planned-order receipts 1200
Planned-order releases 1200
Item: Q Gross requirements 600
Quantity =2 Quantity on Hand 100
LT =1 Net requirements 500
Lot Size =1 Planned-order receipts 500
Planned-order releases 500
Item: S Gross requirements 1500
Quantity =3 Quantity on Hand 0
LT =2 Net requirements 1500
Lot Size =1 Planned-order receipts 1500
Planned-order releases 1500
From the BOM file, we can see that 2 units of P are required for producing 1 unit of
X. Thus 300 units of X would require 600 units of P in the sixth week. Similarly, 2
units of Q are required to produce 1 unit of X. Hence, 300 units of X would require
600 units of Q in the sixth week. As the on-hand inventory of component Q is 100
units, the net requirement for Q is 500. The lead-time to acquire Q is 1 week, so 500
units planned-order release are placed in week 3. Similarly we can deduce the
schedule for R and S as shown in Table 13.3.
41
Operations Scheduling
• Purpose of Scheduling
• Scheduling Methods (Modified)
• Scheduling Activities
• Scheduling by Type of Operations
• Scheduling Personnel in Service Operations (Modified)
• Scheduling Techniques (Modified)
SCHEDULING METHODS
Backward Scheduling
(Added after Problem 1 under ‘Backward Scheduling’ in page 35 of the first
edition)
Problem
National Machines Limited has two job orders, X to produce 1000 nuts and Y to
produce 500 screws. Both orders have to be processed on two machines 1 and 2. The
route sheets for the jobs are given in the following table. Both the jobs should be
ready in the next nine hours and both the machines are to start processing from now
onward. Develop schedules for both the jobs using forward and backward scheduling.
1 1 1 1 2 2
2 2 2 2 1 2
3 1 2 3 2 2
Total 5 Total 6
Solution
Forward Scheduling:
Time 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Machine 1 X1 Y2 Y2 X3 X3
Machine 2 Y1 Y1 X2 X2 Y3 Y3
Here, 1000 nuts along with 500 screws can be produced using the given sequence and
machines earliest by the end of 6th hour.
Operations Scheduling
Backward Scheduling:
Time 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Machine 1 X1 Y2 Y2 X3 X3
Machine 2 Y1 Y1 X2 X2 Y3 Y3
Here, the job of producing 1000 nuts can start latest in the 5th hour, and for 500 screws
using the given sequence and machines by the 4th hour so as to finish by the end of 9
hours.
So Faculty A is assigned offs on Saturday and Sunday, as the lowest pair is (2, 1).
Now we assign the days off to the remaining faculty. The row for Faculty B is
developed by subtracting 1 from all the days that Faculty A works.
43
Operations Management
Faculty B:
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
2 3 3 1 1 2 1
Here, the lowest pair is (1, 1) and it exists on Thursday and Friday. So Faculty B gets
offs on Thursday and Friday.
Now the row for Faculty C is,
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 2 1 1 1 0
Now there is a tie for the least pair. The pair is (1, 1) and it occurs on Thursday and
Friday; as well as Friday and Saturday. We select Friday and Saturday as the lowest
pair, as the adjacent value to this pair is the lowest.
So Faculty C is off on Friday and Saturday.
Since there is no requirement of faculty, Faculty C will also be off on Sunday.
Now the row for Faculty D is,
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
0 1 1 0 1 1 0
So, Faculty D is off on Sunday and Monday. He also gets off on Thursday as there is
no requirement of faculty on that day.
So the Institute can take two employees, Faculty A and Faculty B on a permanent
basis and take Faculty C and Faculty D on a part-time basis. Faculty A and Faculty B
handle one session each and they can be engaged in the other activities of the institute
like content development, research and placement activities.
Faculty C and Faculty D take 4 sessions every week on a part-time basis.
44
Operations Scheduling
Based on the above information, we calculate the time required for completing each
function of all types of products.
B 30 50 30 110
C 60 100 40 200
D 40 80 40 160
5 a.m. – 7 a.m. 8
7 a.m. – 9 a.m. 14
9 a.m. – 11 a.m. 12
11 a.m. – 1 p.m. 18
1 p.m. – 3 p.m. 16
3 p.m. – 5 p.m. 12
5 p.m. – 7 p.m. 12
7 p.m. – 9 p.m. 16
9 p.m. – 11 p.m. 14
45
Operations Management
46
Operations Scheduling
SCHEDULING TECHNIQUES
Machines
Job
P Q R S T
A 9 3 3 5 10
B 12 6 6 7 7
C 7 4 5 2 8
D 13 7 3 4 9
Solution
Here, minimum time on P = 7 hrs,
Maximum time on Q, R, and S are 7, 6, and 7 hrs respectively.
Since the minimum on machine P is equal to and less than the maximum time on
machines Q, R, and S respectively, the problem can move further.
47
Operations Management
Now we take into account two fictitious machines, G and H, whose processing times
are as follows
Machine P Q R S T
Job C 0-7 7-11 11-16 16-18 18-26
Job D 7-20 20-27 27-30 30-34 34-43
Job B 20-32 32-38 38-44 44-51 51-58
Job A 32-41 41-44 44-47 51-56 58-68
SCHEDULING TECHNIQUES
48
Operations Scheduling
A B C D E
Planned days 75 65 73 74 68
Work remaining in days 14 5 18 17 10
Solution
The critical ratios and the priority order are as shown in the following table.
A (75-60)/14 =1.07 5
B (65-60)/5 = 1 4
C (73-60)/18 =0.72 1
D (74-60)/17= 0.82 3
E (68-60)/10 =0.80 2
From the table it can be observed that job C has the lowest critical ratio and hence the
highest priority while job A has the highest critical ratio (ahead of schedule) and thus
the lowest priority.
ERRATA
SCHEDULING TECHNIQUES
There has been a mistake in the table 17.2 in the first edition. The time out for Row
2 of Machine C is 61. As a result the Time in Row 3 of Machine C will also be 61.
The Time out in Row 3 would be 75.
Johnson’s rule for three-stage production
Problem
A firm is involved in five types of jobs, each of which must be processed on three
machines, A, B and C in the order ABC.
The processing time of each job (in hours) on the three machines is given below:
49
Operations Management
Solution
First we check whether the problem satisfies the conditions discussed above.
The smallest processing time on machine A is 12 and it is greater than or equal to the
largest processing time on machine B, i.e. 12.
Therefore, we can use Johnson's n-jobs, 3 - machine procedure to solve the problem.
Gi = Ai + Bi Hi = Bi + Ci
1 28 18
2 31 30
3 17 21
4 22 20
5 30 19
2 12 19 31 31 12 43 43 18 61
4 31 16 47 47 6 53 61 14 75
5 47 21 68 68 9 77 77 10 87
1 68 18 86 86 10 96 96 8 104
50
Operations Scheduling
SCHEDULING TECHNIQUES
The lower the critical ratio, the higher the priority need in sequencing the job in the
next day’s production activities. Here job 3 has the highest priority.
51
Productivity and
Quality Management
• Productivity (New)
• The Strategic Role of Quality
• Role of Inspection in Quality Control
• The Cost of Quality
• Statistical Concepts in Quality Control (Modified)
• Computers in Quality Control
• Concept of TQM (Modified)
PRODUCTIVITY
Productivity Defined
The term ‘productivity’ was first used by French mathematician Quesnay in 1776. He
defined it as the relation of output to input. In 1883, another Frenchman Littre defined
productivity as the “faculty to produce”. In 1950, the Organization of European
Economic Cooperation formally defined productivity as “the quotient obtained by
dividing output by one of the factors of production. In this way, it is possible to speak
of productivity of capital, investment, or raw materials, according to whether output is
being considered in relation to capital, investment, or raw materials respectively.”
In general, productivity can be defined as the relationship between output from the
system and inputs used to produce the output (products and services). In mathematical
terms, it is the ratio of output to input.
Output
Productivity =
Input
Inputs
Inputs are all those factors of production like capital, men, material, machinery, etc.
Inputs can be quantified into different categories like number of man-hours worked,
quantity of material used, tons of raw material consumed, and power consumed in
kilowatts (kW) or megawatts (MW). They can also be viewed in terms of costs
associated like material costs, transportation costs, direct costs, overheads, etc. Input
Productivity and Quality Management
can also be categorized into tangible and intangible assets. Tangible assets include raw
material consumed, components used, and machinery used, while intangible assets
include leadership skills, knowledge of the workers, and training provided.
Outputs
Output may be in terms of the number of customers served in a restaurant, the number
or volume of products produced in a factory, or the number of customer requests
processed in a bank. It can also be tangible or intangible. The number of goods
produced, tons of cement produced, etc., are tangible outputs while customer
satisfaction is intangible. Operations managers need to develop means to quantify the
intangible output to determine productivity accurately.
Components of Productivity
Productivity can be improved in many ways such as by procuring quality raw material
at the lowest possible cost, adopting an optimal mix of production factors, and training
the workers. These different factors/components independently influence the
productivity in different ways. The components can be categorized to include price
efficiency, allocative efficiency, technical efficiency, and scale efficiency.
Price efficiency
Organizations always try to achieve a trade-off between the quality of the material
purchased and the associated costs. Procuring good quality material at the lowest
possible costs would reduce the overall cost of the product. Price efficiency comes in
when such cost reductions are possible without compromising on the quality of the
material purchased.
Allocative efficiency
Operations managers do consider an optimal mix of factors of production. For
instance, a trade-off between capital and labor is necessary to maximize productivity
due to constraints arising in utilizing either of them in a given situation. Hence, the
adoption of an optimal mix of factors of production leads to allocative efficiency.
Technical efficiency
Productivity can be increased either by increasing the output with the same number of
inputs or by producing the same output using fewer inputs. For instance, if 100 units
are produced using 80 units of raw material, then productivity can be increased either
by producing more than 100 units (say 110 units) by using the same number of inputs
(80 units), or by producing 100 units by using less than 80 units of input (say 75 units
of raw material). Either way, the productivity increases and this increase is termed as
technical efficiency. Technical efficiency can be gained by modifying the existing
production processes, introducing automation in production processes, etc.
Scale productivity
This component is concerned with the activity volume. The volume or size of
operations has an impact on the productivity of the organization. For example, let us
assume that the ordering cost for a raw material is fixed irrespective of the quantity
ordered. In this situation, a small organization whose volume of output is low may
find this ordering cost (input) more than a large organization, which has higher output
volumes.
53
Operations Management
Exhibit 18.1
NPC and Productivity Improvement
The National Productivity Council of India (NPC) was established by the
Government of India in 1958 as a registered society. It is an autonomous and non-
profit organization where equal interests are held by the government, the
employers, and the workers’ organizations. NPC provides training and consultation
to organizations in different industries on ways to improve productivity, apart from
undertaking research in the area of productivity. In addition, it also actively
implements the productivity promotion plans and programs of the Tokyo-based
Asian Productivity Organization (APO).
NPC provides productivity training in various disciplines like Human Resource
Management, Information Technology, Process Management, Technology
Management, and Disaster Management. These training modules aim at improving
the existing production methods and implementing new methods. For example,
54
Productivity and Quality Management
Measuring Productivity
Productivity can be measured in relation to a single factor (single factor productivity),
a combination of factors (multifactor productivity), or all the factors taken together
(total productivity). Single factor productivity and multifactor productivity can also be
termed as partial productivity as all the factors of production are not considered while
calculating productivity. Kendrick and Creamer defined partial productivity (single
factor productivity) in 1965 as the ratio of gross or net output to one class of input. An
example of single factor measurement of productivity is labor productivity, which
typically measures output per unit of labor. Multifactor productivity takes into
consideration more than one factor of production such as labor and materials. Total
factor productivity includes all the factors of production (labor, materials, process,
energy, and other inputs). According to Kendrick and Creamer, total factor
productivity is the ratio of the real products originating in the economy, industry, or
firm to the sum of the associated labor and capital (factor) inputs. In this section, we
will focus on productivity measurement for tangibles (production) and intangibles
(knowledge workers, services organizations).
Traditional approach to measurement of productivity
Productivity is measured in terms of partial productivity and total productivity. As
labor is one of the major sources of production costs for organizations, most
productivity ratios are calculated by considering labor as the specific input. This
partial productivity ratio is referred to as the labor productivity index or output per
work-hour ratio.
Goods and/or services produced (output)
Labor productivity =
Labor hours/man − hours spent (input)
Material costs also affect productivity as they add up to 30% to 40% of the overall
costs. Hence, operations managers also measure productivity in terms of material
used.
Goods and/or services produced (output)
Material productivity =
Quantity of material used (output)
In addition, managers often develop specific ratios that gauge productivity for
particular outputs and inputs, such as sales per square foot of floor space, return on
investment, amount of scrap for certain units of output, etc.
Goods and/or services produced (output)
Multifactor productivity =
Quantity of raw material and components used (input)
55
Operations Management
56
Productivity and Quality Management
UCL = x + A2 R
LCL = x – A2 R
57
Operations Management
CL = R
UCL=D3 R
LCL= D4 R
D3 and D4 are constants whose values are based on the sample size.
Problem 18.1
Table 18.1 gives the means ( x ) and range (R) of ten samples each of size 5.
Table 18.1
Sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
x 40 47 38 42 46 42 51 39 41 46
R 6 7 4 8 7 3 6 4 8 6
(Conversion factors for sample size 5 are given as A2 = 0.59, D3 = 2.34, D4 = 0.16)
Comment on the state of the process by using mean and range charts.
Solution
The mean of means is given by:
∑ x 432
x= = = 43.2
n 10
The mean of range
∑ R 59
R= = = 5.9
n 10
The control limits for the X-chart
58
Productivity and Quality Management
The process control state is commented on after analyzing both the charts. In range
chart all the sample ranges fall within the control limits indicating that the process in
control. But the process cannot be assumed to be in control because by observing
X-chart we can see the sample means are outside the control limits indicating out of
control process. An in control process must satisfy the requirements of both the
X-chart and R-chart.
59
Operations Management
Number of 3 2 2 1 4 2 1 4 2 1
defectives
Solution
Fraction defective for each sample is given by
p = c/n = number of defective/sample size
Fraction defective for Sample 1 = 3/30 = 0.1
Fraction defective for Sample 2 = 2/30 = 0.067
Similarly, calculate the fraction defective for all ten samples
Sample Fraction Defective
1 0.1
2 0.07
3 0.07
4 0.03
5 0.13
6 0.07
7 0.03
8 0.13
9 0.07
10 0.03
P= ∑P = 0.73/10=0.073
N
60
Productivity and Quality Management
CL=0.073
UCL =0.073 + 0.142 = 0.215
LCL =0.073 - 0.142 = -0.069 = 0, as the value obtained for LCL is negative.
The Figure 18.3 of p-chart indicates that the process is in control as all the values are
within the control limits.
Figure 18.3: P-Chart
Problem 18.3
The number of defects in a process was noted after observing 10 samples of a painting
job. The errors in these samples are given in Table 18.3.
Table 18.3
Sample Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Number of 3 7 2 0 4 6 1 2 4 3
Defects
Using c-chart determine whether the process is in control or out of control.
61
Operations Management
Solution
First we have to find the average ( c ), which will be the central limit.
∑ c 32
c = = = 3.2
n 10
Control limits for this process is given by:
UCL = 3.2 + 3 3.2 = 8.57
LCL = 3.2 – 3 3.2 = -2.17
CL = 3.2
As LCL for this sample is negative, it is taken as zero.
Now the C-chart can be obtained by plotting the number of defects on the Y-axis and
sample number on the X-axis.
As we see in Figure 18.4 the defects are within the control limits. Hence, the process
is treated as in control.
Figure 18.4: C-Chart
CONCEPT OF TQM
(Added under ‘Concept of TQM’ in page 272 of the first edition)
TQM Principles
A list of TQM principles is given below that act as a framework for overall
improvement in quality standards.
Systematic improvement
TQM as a philosophy involves improvement in every aspect of an organization’s
functioning, and is not limited to a single product or process. It is a systematic process
of improving and maintaining quality standards in an organization. Systematic
improvement involves identifying and managing the relationships between various
processes and systems to achieve organizational objectives.
62
Productivity and Quality Management
Customer focused
The customer is the focus of the total quality management approach, and not an
individual product or service. TQM evaluates customers’ requirements, needs and
wants and then, provides requisite products and services that satisfy their requirements
or exceed their expectations. Customer focus enables an organization to respond
effectively, and on time to any changes in markets. TQM also leads to increased
customer loyalty, which in turn brings repeat business to an organization.
Continuous improvement
Quality is not an end item, but an ongoing process of improvement. Continuous
improvement results in improved organizational capabilities, which enable the
organization to take advantage of upcoming opportunities. By continuous
improvement in the production process, products and employees skills, organizations
can maintain their competitive position in the market.
Problem prevention
TQM philosophy is proactive rather than reactive. It emphasizes on the prevention of
problems rather than the use of remedial measures. This is achieved by employing
statistical process control tools, problem solving, system failure analysis, etc. By
applying problem prevention principle, an organization can reduce wastages,
minimize rejects and improve production process.
Universal responsibility
Maintaining quality is not just a prerogative of the top management or quality
inspection department but every employee at all levels is equally responsible for its
implementation. Quality responsibilities result in the employees being more
committed, motivated and creative in performing assigned tasks.
Designing quality for products
Total quality management principles advocate the integration of quality initiatives
with all business processes. Design, the first phase of production, has a significant
affect on the overall quality of the end product. Quality in design is important not only
for the development of products and services, but also for the development of
processes. Genichi Taguchi advocated the importance of quality in design. According
to him, activities such as process control, inspection, and defects removal, alone do
not improve quality. The three important aspects of design quality are:
Meeting customer requirements: During the design process, an organization should
focus on meeting customer requirements. As mentioned earlier, making a quality
product or service involves providing value to customers, not increasing the number
of features. So the design team must either know the exact customer requirements or
should be able to estimate them fairly accurately. During the design phase, the design
team must be kept informed of any changes in customer requirements, which might
influence the design objectives.
Capability of process: The product design should take into consideration the
capability of the process. During the initial stages of product or service design,
operations managers and designers should work together to ensure that production
requirements match process capability.
Standardization to improve quality: To ensure the quality of products during the
design stage, designers should use standard procedures, materials, and processes that
have proven quality. Standardization allows easy acceptance of the product in the
market.
Environment friendly features and attributes in a product or process have become
another quality benchmark. For instance, one of the quality benchmarks for
automobiles is emission and noise levels.
63
Facilities and
Maintenance Management
• Facilities Management (New)
• Necessity of Maintenance Management
• Types of Maintenance
• Economics of Maintenance
• Evaluation of Preventive Maintenance Policies (Modified)
• Maintenance Planning (New)
• Modern Approaches to Preventive Maintenance
• Recent Trends in Maintenance
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
(New Heading added at the beginning of the chapter)
According to Sheila Sheridan, Chairperson (2002-2004), International Facility
Management Associationi, in the 1980s, facilities management used to be a practice
that involved coordinating the physical facilities, people, and work of the organization
using the principles of business administration, architecture, and behavioral and
engineering sciences. By the early 2000s, the whole concept had changed and
facilities management became a distinct function in management that spanned
multiple management disciplines to ensure the smooth and efficient functioning of the
workplace and a work environment that integrated people, process, place, and
technology.
The primary objective of facilities management is to provide a clean and conducive
work environment to enable efficient and effective progress of the core functions of an
organization, be it manufacturing, distribution, or research. For example, CMC
Limited, a leading IT solutions company in India, provides facilities management
services to its clients. It undertakes operations and maintenance of IT infrastructure on
the clients’ premises. Indian Railways, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Bank of
Baroda, Kodak India, Bombay Stock Exchange, and OTTO India are some of its
clients.
This section highlights the nature of facilities management, functions of facilities
managers, the rationale behind outsourcing of the facilities management function,
facilities management and its relationship with maintenance management, and
facilities management in India.
65
Operations Management
hours to fix problems that arise in the facilities. For example, leaks in the pipelines or
a short circuit leading to fire accidents may disrupt work in the organization. Facilities
managers have to see that such problems are corrected as and when they are detected.
The following are some of the important functions of a facilities manager.
• Conducting and participating in planning activities along with architects,
production engineers, and the top management while performing alterations to
facilities or expanding the facilities. This helps in designing better facilities.
• Reviewing the techniques that are used to reduce costs and raising maintenance
levels in the facilities. Reduced costs result in improved profits. Better
maintenance levels help increase the life of assets and ensure a productive work
environment.
• Recruiting and/or hiring people for carrying out various facilities management
functions. Manning the department with the right kind of people is an important
function of the facilities manager, because the right people in the right jobs help
to increase efficiency, and lower wastage and costs.
• Measuring the work performance of the facilities management teams using work
measurement techniques and motivating them to raise their performance levels. A
highly motivated team always produces better performance and higher
productivity
• Developing and maintaining a controlling center that acts as a strategic support to
the facilities management department. Such a center acts as the center-point of
activity from where the facilities managers can execute and control decisions in
the facilities management department.
• Communicating with other department heads and personnel and understanding
their nature of work. Also, maintaining good rapport with them as the success of
the facilities management department’s functions is dependent on other
departments.
• Developing good relationships with the service providers and maintaining a
congenial work atmosphere in the facilities by applying sound management
principles.
• Guiding employees and the top management in developing innovative ways of
improving the work atmosphere in the facilities.
• Acting as change managers in situations where existing processes or
infrastructure is modified or replaced with new ones to suit the organizational
goals. Facilities managers should make the workers understand the necessity of
the changes brought about in the organization and make them work toward
achieving the organizational goals.
Exhibit 19.1
Waste Management in Healthcare Industry
Waste management in healthcare institutions is an important and critical activity. Most of the
healthcare institutions in India do not have waste management centers nor do they maintain standards
in managing the waste in their facilities. Waste management is one of the functions of facilities
management. It includes removal of waste from the premises, segregating the waste, disposing it of,
and/or treating it to make it harmless to society. Waste in healthcare institutions like hospitals,
clinics, etc., include used dressings, disposable syringes, outdated drugs, empty drug bottles, etc. This
function helps keep the hospital premises neat and tidy to ensure a cleaner environment and the
speedy recovery of patients.
66
Facilities and Maintenance Management
Bangalore-based Health Care Waste Management Cell (HCWMC) is in the process of educating
healthcare institutions to set up in-house waste management centers. It is necessary to have a waste
management center in every healthcare institution to manage the waste effectively. According to the
HCWMC, healthcare institutions lack the required information and support to manage healthcare
wastes. Realizing this, the HCWMC has set up a resource center in Bangalore to train healthcare
institutions in waste management, capacity building, and providing access to required information.
The mission of the HCWMC is to advocate the cause of managing medical waste, disseminating
information, training, research, capacity building, and networking. The training programs and
supporting information aim at encouraging and helping the institutions to set up their in-house waste
management centers. The HCWMC feels that it is necessary to bring about an attitudinal change
toward waste management in the people managing these institutions and it has worked to bring in
institutional commitment and participation from all levels of people in these institutions.
Further, stringent rules from the government regarding waste management and growing demand for
quality from insurance companies (for accreditations) have also forced the healthcare institutions to
take up in-house waste management in their facilities.
Adapted from Vijaya, K. “In-House Systems for Waste Segregation is Critical: Interview with Dr.D.
Gopinath.” Express Healthcare Management. January 15, 2002, October 3, 2006.
Outsourcing the Facilities Management Function
Facilities managers use out-tasking/outsourcing to carry out the various tasks in
facilities management. Out-tasking (i.e. hiring of individual, specialized vendors) is
used more frequently than outsourcing (i.e. hiring of full-service, single source
vendors). Out-tasking supplements in-house delivery capability with sub-contracted
expertise or capacity. Outsourcing seeks to integrate the expertise and capacity of a
service provider toward a strategic objective. Outsourcing the facilities management
function has become a part of the strategic planning of organizations to gain long-term
benefits. There are many reasons as to why facilities management services are
outsourced, one major one being to concentrate on the core competencies and leaving
the additional functions to external sources specializing in this field. For example,
Punj Lloyd, an engineering construction and facilities management company, provides
operational and maintenance services for the power plants of the Oil and Natural Gas
Commission (ONGC). By outsourcing these services to Punj Lloyd, ONGC can focus
on its core activities of oil exploration and extraction. Another reason why
organizations outsource facilities management services is that they don’t have
employees with requisite skills. Outsourcing is also done when the organization feels
that it is costly to handle the services in-house.
Services that are most commonly outsourced are architectural design, trash and waste
removal from the premises, housekeeping, landscape maintenance, property
appraisals, hazardous material removal, furniture movement, and food and
refreshment services. Johnson Controls is a global operator in this domain and
provides a comprehensive list of such services. They include services ranging from
budget management and risk management, performance management, operations and
maintenance services, product and facility design services. (Refer to Exhibit 19.2 for
further details on Johnson Controls).
Generally, the need to outsource facilities management originates from the facilities
management department itself. Facilities managers do this to reduce their cost of
operations and improve the quality of tasks performed. The benefits and costs accrued
are not accepted by everyone. Some sections accept outsourcing as a means to reduce
costs while some believe that it increases costs. Let us look at the costs and benefits
associated with outsourcing of services in facilities management.
67
Operations Management
Exhibit 19.2
Johnson Controls – One Stop Shop for All Facilities
Management Needs
Johnson Controls is a global player in the field of electrical and electronic control systems like
thermostats, actuators, sensors, valves, etc. Facilities management is one of the services that the
company offers. It provides various services of facilities management at the strategic level as well as
at the operational level, under one roof. Strategic level services include Account/Budget
Management, Supply Chain/Supplier Diversity, Performance Management, Triple Bottom Line
Reporting, Risk Management, Transition Management, Strategy Development, Subcontractor
Management, Capital Planning, and Benchmarking. Operational level services are classified into
three broad categories – business site services, business critical and technical services, and workplace
and infrastructural design services. Several services are performed under each of these. For example,
reception, conference services, surveillance, reprographics (duplication of printed material), and
waste management services are under business site services.
Johnson Controls has developed support mechanisms to ensure quality services to clients enhance
efficiency, and reduce costs. They include:
Center for Excellence: As part of offering account/budget management services, the company has
established a global center for excellence where experts from different fields analyze the client’s
existing accounts and industry benchmarks to reduce operational costs.
Training Programs: Johnson Controls provides training to its employees as well as those of clients
in the areas of leadership, ethics, safety, and technical skills.
Customer Reports: In addition to the various services offered, it also provides reports on daily,
monthly, and quarterly basis to all levels in the client’s organization. This is to ensure that the client
can see the return on investment gained in outsourcing various services to the company. The reports
essentially contain Johnson Controls’ performance on the client’s premises that enable the client to
make effective business decisions.
Clients for Life: It is a customer relationship management program which focuses on account
management and creativity workshops so that clients’ needs and requirements are identified and
understood in the face of the ever changing work environment.
Adapted from www.johnsoncontrols.com.
Costs associated with outsourcing
Outsourcing of facilities management to external agencies is not always as profitable
as the facilities managers and the top management expect. There are also different
associated costs, which can hinder the expected savings from the outsourcing
contracts and reduce the quality of performance. Some of these costs are listed here:
Loss of Control: If the client organization passes over control of its facilities to an
external agency, it is like inviting the agency to gain monopoly over its facilities. This
can lead to loss of control over crucial decisions like alterations or expansion of
facilities or cost savings. Also, the client may lose the power to control any deviations
in the performance of the vendors. Loss of control can lead to strained relationships
between the client and vendors and become the cause for serious conflicts. To avoid
such situations, client organizations generally enter into a contract with multiple
vendors to restrict the monopoly situation and to have better control over the vendors’
performance.
Decrease in flexibility: Switching costs arise when a client enters into a contract with
the vendor(s) and hands over control. For instance, when the facility management of a
manufacturing plant is outsourced, the client organization first decommissions all the
machinery and then the vendor takes over. As a result, the initial costs are very high
68
Facilities and Maintenance Management
for the service provider. To make up these costs and gain profits in the operations, the
service providers need some time. Thus, they would normally prefer long-term
contracts with the client organizations (as long-term contracts would be profitable to
the vendors). But such long-term contracts are usually less flexible for the client
organizations, especially if they want to regain control. Also, the cost to the client will
increase in a long-term contract as the vendors have the flexibility to raise or revise
prices.
Decrease in staffing quality: The vendors bring in their own staff and workers who
are trained to work in multiple work places (to perform the facilities management
activities in different client organizations). Sometimes vendors employ skilled
workers in the initial period of the contract. Once the client is satisfied with the
performance of the vendor, these skilled personnel will be replaced with semi-skilled
or unskilled personnel to reduce the direct operating costs. This can lead to an increase
in costs for the client and a decrease in the quality of work.
Increase in costs over time: The goals and objectives of the client and service provider
differ widely and may not be in line with each other. The service providers’ need to
raise profits can lead to exploitation of the client’s resources or a reduction in the
quality of work. They may also exclude some of the processes from the contract with
the excuse of raising costs and charging for them separately. This will increase the
costs of the client and eventually decrease the quality of work.
Benefits of outsourcing
Despite these costs associated with outsourcing the facilities management function,
there are also certain advantages or benefits that accrue to the client organizations.
The increasing popularity of outsourcing is evidence of the associated benefits. Hence,
many organizations (large and small) have outsourced the management of their
facilities to specialized vendors in this field. Given here are some of the benefits that
clients derive by outsourcing the management of their facilities.
Reduced costs: When the management of facilities is outsourced to external vendor(s),
the cost of operations go down considerably as the organization (client) need not pay
regular salaries for the employees and the wages of the workers involved in these
activities. The client has to just pay the pre-agreed price for the services offered by the
service provider. Generally this is lower than the sum of the actual costs of operations.
Besides, the client need not spend money on training the workers and that also leads
to cost savings.
Increased quality: Services are usually outsourced to specialized service providers.
They bring in staff and workers who are trained to carry out the tasks. Hence, the
quality of work performed by these trained workers is usually far superior to that of
the client.
Focus on core competencies: This is one of the major reasons for the increasing
popularity of outsourcing. The basic goal of any organization is to satisfy their
respective customers. By outsourcing the functions of facilities management,
organizations can focus more attention on their core competencies, and this leads to
better customer service. It also increases their competitive advantage in the respective
markets.
69
Operations Management
look after this function. This changed with the entry of multinational companies in the
1990s after the liberalization of the economy, especially with the entry of
multinational software companies, which had their own views on cleanliness levels.
The next change occurred with the entry of multinational facilities management
companies like C B Richard Ellisii, Hadeniii, Knight Frankiv, and Sodexov.
Higher levels of cleanliness have become the norm now and many facilities
management service providers specializing in various services have entered the
market. The market for outsourcing facilities management services has also grown.
Apart from janitorial and maintenance services, other complex services like waste
management, water treatment and management, asset protection services, health
facilities management, etc. have come under the scope of facilities management.
Updater Servicesvi (UDS) and Integrated Property Management & Servicesvii (IPMS)
are some examples of Indian companies that provide such services.
Facilities management services are required by different clients both in the
manufacturing sector as well as in the services sector. Facilities management services
in the manufacturing and services sectors vary in terms of scope. The presence of
heavy machinery and equipment in manufacturing companies’ calls for preventive
maintenance services and safety & security services, while service oriented companies
like banks and BPOs may see janitorial services as the prime service under facilities
management. But many services are common like waste removal, food and catering,
landscape maintenance, janitorial services, security services, etc. As a result, many
companies provide services to both manufacturing and service organizations. For
example, UDS, specializes in providing janitorial services to manufacturing as well as
service organizations like Godrej, Reliance, Infosys, American Express Bank and
Saint-Gobain.
70
Facilities and Maintenance Management
If the yearly cost of servicing the failed machines is Rs.7000, what is the average cost
of repairs per machine per occasion?
Solution
Mean time between failure = ∑ i.P(i)
= (1 x 0.05) + (2 x 0.05) + (3 x 0.10) + (4 x 0.10) + (5 x 0.10) + (6 x 0.10) + (7 x 0.10)
+ (8 x 0.10) + (9 x 0.10) + (10 x 0.10) + (11 x 0.05) + (12 x 0.05)
= 6.5 months
Number of breakdowns per year = 12/6.5 = 1.846
Number of breakdowns per year for 50 machines = 1.846 x 50 = 92.3
Average cost of repairs per machine per occasion = 7000/92.3 = Rs.75.84
Problem 2
The probabilities of failure after maintenance for a machine are given in the following
table
Quarters after maintenance 1 2 3 4 5
Probabilities of break-down 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3
If there are 30 identical machines in the plant, what is the expected number of
breakdowns in the 3rd quarter? If the average cost of preventive maintenance is Rs.500
and the cost of remedial maintenance per machine is 4000, calculate the average total
cost of maintenance per month.
Solution
Expected number of breakdowns Bt = N (P1 + P2 + P3 +…+ Pt) + Bt-1 P1+ Bt-2 P2+…+
B1 Pt-1
Given N=30 and t=3
B1 = N P1 = 30 x 0.1 = 3
B2 = N(P1 + P2) + B1P1
= 30(0.1 +0.1) + 3 x.0.1
= 6 + 0.3 = 6.3
B3 = N(P1 + P2 + P3) + B2P1 + B1P2
= 30(0.1 + 0.1 + 0.2) + 6.3 x 0.1 + 6 x 0.1
71
Operations Management
= 12 + 0.63 + 0.6
= 13.23
Hence, the expected number of breakdowns in the 3rd quarter = 13.23
Total cost of maintenance for every 3 quarters = CP x N + CR x Bt
= 500 x 30 + 4000 x 13.23
= 15000 + 52920
= Rs.67920
Average total cost per quarter = 67,920/3 = Rs.22,640
Average total cost per month = 22,640/3 = Rs.7546.67
MAINTENANCE PLANNING
New Heading added after ‘Evaluation of Preventive Maintenance Policies’ in page
283 of the first edition)
As the production costs are increasing and the manufacturing processes are becoming
more complex, the need for maintenance has increased manifold. Planned
maintenance helps organizations reduce the expenditure on maintenance and the costs
associated with failures. Preventive maintenance activities are repetitive in nature and
performed according to a schedule. On the other hand, remedial maintenance is not
repetitive and is performed on a need-to-do basis, as future breakdowns cannot be
predicted. Preventive maintenance activities involve identification of probable
problems and estimation of the amount and type of work that is required to keep the
systems working in optimal working condition. This estimation enables maintenance
managers to schedule and plan their maintenance programs. Subsequently, they
determine the sequence in which various maintenance activities are carried out.
Managers use the available information to determine the labor hours, tools,
equipment, materials and other accessories required to implement the maintenance
plan. The maintenance tasks are prioritized on the basis of their significance in
maintaining a continuous production process when maintenance resources are scarce.
These priorities help organizations allocate resources to those critical systems whose
failure will have disastrous effect on the production process. Besides, maintenance
managers often maintain inventories of equipment and materials required for
maintenance activities to reduce the lead-time before a repair can begin. Organizations
with production facilities in more than one location reduce inventory costs by storing
basic and frequently used maintenance materials at each location, and occasionally
used materials at a centralized location.
Many organizations use computerized maintenance management systems to improve
their maintenance planning. Maintenance is carried out throughout the life of a piece
of equipment. The bathtub curve assists in decisions regarding maintenance
requirements. If organizations are not able to fulfill the maintenance requirements,
they outsource maintenance activities from outside vendors.
Bathtub Curve
It would be of great help to operations mangers if they were able to predict when the
probability of equipment failure will be highest. The bathtub curve illustrates the
different stages a piece of equipment goes through in its lifetime and the probability of
failure during a particular stage. Figure 19.2 illustrates the structure of a bathtub
72
Facilities and Maintenance Management
curve. During the first stage of infant mortality, the probability of failure is very high
but it decreases rapidly. The reason for these failures can be attributed to improper
design and installation. This stage is also known as the ‘burn in’ stage where the
functional defects in the products come to fore. Once this stage is passed, the
equipment enters into the adult or useful life stage where the failure rate is constant,
and to some extent, predictable. Proper maintenance of equipment can ensure the
longevity of this stage. Most of the causes of failure during this stage are attributed to
external causes or accidents, for example, a mistake by an operator, or usage of
improper materials. Then finally, the equipment reaches old age or wear out stage,
where the failure rate increases. During this stage, organizations go in for a complete
overhaul of the system or replacement of the system. The failure rate in each of these
stages depends on the reliability of the equipment installed and on the amount of
maintenance effort spent on it. The bathtub curve can be used not only to study the
failure rates characteristic of new equipment but can also be applied for old
equipment, which has undergone servicing under preventive maintenance. After the
preventive maintenance is completed, the equipment again goes through the stages
defined in the bathtub curve. The bathtub curve may not always be an effective
indicator of the failure rates of equipment. For example, present day manufacturers
dispatch equipment only after the ‘burn in’ period is over, so that they can identify
and rectify the problem before it reaches the end users. So the initial stage of the
bathtub curve will not be applicable to such machines.
Figure 19.2: Bathtub Curve
Contract Maintenance
In order to reduce the costs incurred in maintenance, many organizations outsource
their maintenance activities. The process of outsourcing an organization's maintenance
activities to external vendors is known as contract maintenance. Contract maintenance
is useful for seasonal or irregular maintenance activities, which do not warrant the
involvement of the in-house maintenance department. Further, external maintenance
personnel have the requisite training and expertise to service complex systems. By
outsourcing non-core activities like maintenance, an organization can concentrate on
its core business activities.
73
Operations Management
i
International Facility Management Association (IFMA) is a professional association for
facility management with more than 18,500 members. The members represent 125 chapters
in 60 countries. IFMA conducts research, provides educational programs, certifies facilities
managers and conducts international conferences on facilities management.
ii
CB Richard Ellis is a global full-service real estate company. It has operations in 58 countries
with headquarters in California, USA.
iii
Haden, based in England, was established in 1816 as a heating and ventilating company.
Later it began to provide facilities management services. It is a specialty provider in building
management services.
iv
Knight Frank is an international real estate and property consultant having operations in over
30 countries with 165 offices.
v
Headquartered in France and with operations in 76 countries, Sodexo is an international
facilities management services operator. Its services include Food and management services,
Service vouchers and cards, River and harbor cruises.
vi
Updater Services is a Chennai-based integrated facilities management service provider.
It specializes in building maintenance services, M&E services, HVAC maintenance services,
and garden & lawn maintenance services.
vii
Integrated Property Management & Services is a subsidiary of Infrastructure Leasing and
Financial Services Limited (IL&FS), which focuses on facilities management.
74
Project Management
• Necessity of Project Management
• Network Modeling
• Project Planning Methods (Modified)
• Project Crashing
Solution
The critical path can be computed by knowing the earliest and latest times for each of
the activities mentioned in Figure 20.4. The following table shows the earliest and
latest times.
The earliest start time (EST) for event 1 in the network will be 0 or E1 = 0, E2 =
E1+D1-2, E3 = E1+D1-3, etc.
Earliest finish time (EFT) = Activity duration + EST
Table 20.3: Calculation of Earliest and Latest Time for an Activity
Activities Duration Earliest Starting Earliest Finish Latest Finish Latest Float
(Days) Time (E) Time (E+D) Time Starting Time (L-D)-E
(D) (L) (L-D)
1-2 6 0 6 6 0 0
1-4 4 0 4 6 2 2
2-3 3 6 9 9 6 0
Operations Management
3-5 5 9 14 12 7 -2
3-6 3 9 12 8 5 -3
3-7 6 9 15 15 9 0
4-6 6 4 8 8 2 -2
5-7 3 14 17 15 12 9
6-7 7 10 17 15 8 -2
7-8 3 15 18 18 15 0
In this problem, the float value is zero for activity 1-2, 2-3, 3-7, and 7-8. Hence, the
critical path for this network problem is 1-2-3-7-8.
3-5 5 7 6 6 0.1089
76
Project Management
Completion time TE = sum of the all the (expected mean times (te) on the critical path
as determined in problem 2 (1-2-3-7-8) = 6 + 3.83 + 6.33 + 4.83 = 20.99 (21 weeks
approx)
Standard deviation (of critical path) = √variance = √ 0.4444 + 0.25 + 0.4356 + 0.25 =
√1.1747
Probability of project extending over 20 weeks = (20 – 20.99) / (√1.1747) = 0.99/1.17
= 0.846
Thus, there is a very high probability of the project going on beyond 20 weeks.
77