Asset Market Approach To Exchange Rate Determination PDF

Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and
Retrospective Theses and Dissertations

Dissertations
1982
Asset market approach to exchange rate

determination
Isaac Quao Mensah
Iowa State University
Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd

Part of the Economics Commons
Recommended Citation
Mensah, Isaac Quao, "Asset market approach to exchange rate determination " (1982). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 7058.
https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/7058
This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University
Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University
Digital Repository. For more information, please contact digirep@iastate.edu.
INFORMATION TO USERS
This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the
most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document
have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material
submitted.
The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand

markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction.
1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document
photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing
page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages.
This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating
adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity.
2. When an image on the film is obliterated with u round black mark it is an

indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of
movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete
copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good
image of the page in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were
deleted you will find a target note listing the pages in the adjacent frame.
3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo
graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in "sectioning"
the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of
a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small
overiaps. if necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the
first row and continuing on until complete.
4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography,

photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your
xerographic copy. Requests can be made to our Dissertations Customer
Services Department.
5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases we have
filmed the best available copy.
University
Microfilms
International
300 N. ZEEB RD.. ANN ARBOR. Ml 48106
8221206
Mensah, Isaac Quao
ASSET MARKET APPROACH TO EXCHANGE RATE DETERMINATION
loy/a State University PH.D. 1982
University
Microfilms
International mX.ZeebRoad.AnnAitwr.MI48106
Asset market approach to
exchange rate determination
by
Isaac Quao Mensah
A Dissertation Submitted to the

Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
Major: Economics
Approved:
Signature was redacted for privacy.
In Cha^^ of Maj Work
Iowa State University

Ames, Iowa
1982
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1
Objectives of the Study 3
Outline of the Study 6
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 9
Theories of the Exchange Rate Determination 9
Empirical Literature 19
CHAPTER 3. THE THEORETICAL MODEL 24
General Features of the Small Country Model 24
The Role of Expectations 31
Explanation for Exchange Rate Volatility 34
Steady State 53
Short Run Analysis 56
Unanticipated transitory monetary disturbance 59
Unanticipated permanent monetary disturbance 65
Anticipated disturbances 78
Anticipated permanent monetary disturbance 81
Anticipated transitory monetary disturbance 113
General Features of the Two Country Model 115
The Exchange Rate Equation 119
CHAPTER 4. EMPIRICAL ESTIMATION 123
The Model 133
Empirical Results 136
Anticipated and Unanticipated Money Supplies and
the Exchange Rate Level 146
Identification 148
Estimation and Diagnostic Checking 151
Autocorrelation check 152
Cumulative periodogram check 153
Exchange Rate Volatility 165
CHAPTER 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 168
iii
REFERENCES 173
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 176
APPENDIX 1. DATA 177
Time Period Under Study 177
Variables and Definitions 177
Derived Variables 178
Data Sources 178
APPENDIX 2. DERIVATION OF THE FORMULA FOR x.
(EXPECTED RATE OF DEPRECIATION)^ 179
APPENDIX 3. DERIVATION OF PARAMETER VALVUES
FOR EQUATIONS DERIVED UNDER FULL
RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS 180
Derivation of the Homogeneous Solution 186
APPENDIX 4. DERIVATION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
^ and 2 188
iv
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 1. The time path of the exchange rate when
a transitory change in the money supply
is unanticipated 62
Figure 2. The time path of the exchange rate when a
permanent change in the money stock is
unanticipated 68
Figure 3, The time path of a^ due to a permanent
open market operation policy 73
Figure 4. The time path of p^ due to a permanent
open market operation policy 75
Figure 5. The time path of the exchange rate when
a permanent change in the money stock by
means of open market operation is
unanticipated 77
Figure 6. The time path of the exchange rate under
partial rational expectations when a
permanent open market operation is
anticipated 84
Figure 7a. The time path of the price level (exchange
rate) under full rational expectations
when an open market operation is antic
ipated 92
Figure 7b. The time path of the foreign asset level
a^, under full rational expectations when
an open market operation is anticipated 93
Figure 8a. The time path of the price level (exchange
rate) under full rational expectations
when an open market operation is antic
ipated 97
Figure 8b. The time path of the foreign asset level
a^, under full rational expectations when
an open market operation is anticipated 98
V
Figure 9. The time path of the external assets level

when the change in the money stock is
anticipated under full rational expecta
tions
Figure 10. The time paths of the exchange rate when
the change in the money stock is antic
ipated under full rational and partial
rational expectations
Figure 11. Sample autocorrelation function for time
series Ln(M^)
Figure 12. Sample partial autocorrelation function
for time series Ln(M^)
Figure 13. Autocorrelation function of the residuals
for model AR(1)
for model AR(2)
Figure 15. Cumulative normalized periodogram for
model AR(1)
model AR(2)
for the model AEMA(1, 1)
model AEMA(1, 1)
vi
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Calculated exchange rate levels in
response to anticipated open market
operations 95
response to anticipated open market
operations 100
response to anticipated pure monetary
expansion 111
Comparison of the effects of anticipated
and unanticipated permanent monetary
expansion 113
OLS estimates for Ln(S) DM/ unre
stricted 125
OLS estimates for Ln(S) DM/ restricted-
mixed samule and prior information 125
OLS estimates for Ln(S) DM/ restricted-
mixed sample and prior information 127
OLS estimates for Ln(S) $/ 127
OLS estimates for S($/DM) 130
Consistent estimates for reaction func
tions and exchange rates (25LS) 131
Unrestricted OLS estimates for S(DM/$) 137
Unrestricted estimates for S(DM/$)
corrected for first order autocorrelation 142
Estimates for S(DM/$) restrictions
imposed, corrected for first order
autocorrelation 143
Estimates for S(G/$) restrictions imposed,
corrected for first order autocorrelation 145
vii
Table 14. Comparison of models 1 and 2 155

Table 15. OLS estimates for anticipated and un
anticipated monetary changes for
S(DM/$) 164
Table 16. OLS estimates for anticipated and un
anticipated monetary changes for S(G/$) 166
Table 17. Correlation between exchange rates and
money supply deviation from expected
money supply 167
1
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
Recently, increased attention has been focused on

the asset market approach to exchange rate determination.
The asset market approach to exchange rates views an
exchange rate as the relative price of national monies.
And it is viewed as one of the prices that equilibrates
the international markets for various financial assets.
Hence, the supplies of and demand for stocks of various
monies and other financial assets are the important
elements under this approach.
In contrast, the traditional theory of exchange
rate determination is based solely on the current account.
It focuses on the demand for and the supply of foreign
exchange and the price elasticities of import demands
and export supplies. Demand for foreign exchange is
determined by value of imports, while the supply of foreign
exchange is determined by the value of exports ; both of
these are flow concepts.
Consequently, these two theories view equilibrium
exchange rate determination differently. First, the
traditional theory views the exchange rate as the relative
price of national outputs, instead of as the relative
price of national monies. Second, it assumes the exchange
rate to be determined by conditions for equilibrium in the
2
markets for flow of funds, instead of by the conditions

for equilibrium in the markets for stocks of assets. In
view of the asset market approach, considerations of
elasticities is irrelevant, since the traditional theory
on which it is based has some erroneous concepts. These
are discussed in Chapter 2.
The development of a model capable of explaining
exchange rate determination requires the identification of
factors that affect exchange rate levels. Previous studies
have identified several factors that influence exchange
rate levels. First, the conditions of assets market
equilibrium play a vital role in determining the exchange
rate. The assets aspects of the model arise through the
assumption that the exchange rate as the relative price
of two assets, is primarily determined by the relative
supplies and demand for these assets. Second, the current
value of the exchange rate is strongly influenced by
expectations of its future value and is dependent on the
information that underlies these expectations. Exchange
rate expectations are influenced by every conceivable
economic, political, social and psychological factor.
The exchange rate expectation could be treated as
predetermined in the short run, and the rate of exchange
determined as a valuation of domestic money relative to
foreign assets so as to maintain money market equilibrium.
3
This approach is used by Frenkel (1976) and Kouri (1976).

Alternatively, the exchange rate expectation could be viewed
as providing the critical equilibrating mechanism. Under
this rule, the expectational variable is made endogenous'in
the short run, and given interest rate parity is assumed to
adjust in such a way that the expected rate of return equili
brates the money market. This is adopted by Dombusch (1976),
Tumovsky and Kingston (1977), and Mussa (1979). Third, the
equilibrium exchange rate depends on the current and real
factors that affect absolute and relative prices; it also
depends on current expectations concerning the future
behavior of these exogenous monetary and real factors.
Many other factors impinge on the level and adjustments
of the exchange rate; for example, differential movements
in absolute price levels as suggested by one purchasing
power parity doctrine; and changes in the relative price
of different national outputs essential to the maintenance
of external trade balance equilibrium.
Objectives of the Study

In his important contribution, Dombusch (1976)
presents a monetary approach model to exchange rate
determination in the short run. In his model, domestic
money is the only available asset, there are no other
alternative assets, and no wealth effects. An addition
4
of alternative assets would enlarge the range of analysis

to consideration of capital flows, and the determination
of domestic interest rates. With the introduction of
the effects of the level of domestic holdings of wealth
on assets demands, there could be a positive wealth effect
on desired holdings of assets. The first order effect
of this extension would be an inverse dependence of the
exchange rate (defined as the price of a unit of the
foreign currency in terms of domestic money), and the
price level on the level of wealth. His simple dynamic
macroeconomic model is employed to study how exchange
rates respond to unanticipated shocks to the economy.
This analysis could be extended to include anticipated
shocks to the economy, using the framework developed by
Fischer (1979).
The purpose of this study then, is to modify and
extend Dombusch's (1976) study. Dombusch assumed that
the expected rate of depreciation of the spot rate is
proportional to the discrepancy between the long-run
rate and the current spot rate. This expectation formation
is purely ad hoc, and therefore this approach will be
modified and rational expectations introduced into the
model. The introduction of rational expectations merges
the assets and current account theories of exchange
rates because it can lead to a fully anticipated equilibrium
5
path in which asset prices adjust in part to reflect

future current account developments. Secondly, in this
present model, the demand for real money balances is
assumed to depend not only on the domestic interest
rate and real income, but also on wealth. Finally, in
this study, Dombusch's analysis will be extended to
consider the impact of anticipated monetary expansions
on the exchange rate.
A model of the financial sector and the goods
sector is presented. The model will share the central
features of the analytical work of Dombusch (1976),
Dombusch and Fischer (1980), Mussa (1976 and 1979),
Kouri (1976), and others. Specifically the objectives
of the study are: (1) to analyze the role of the asset
market equilibrium, good market equilibrium and expecta
tions in the determination of the exchange rate in the
short run. (2) to analyze the effects of monetary
disturbances, particularly to examine the effects of
anticipated and unanticipated monetary expansions on the
exchange rate. (3) to develop tests of the asset market
approach to the determination of exchange rates, using
data from the flexible exchange rate period.
The monetary approach model provides several specific
conclusions that can be tested empirically. In this
•model, both monetary and fiscal policies have real effects.
6
Because money is viewed as an asset, changing the money

supply changes real wealth and hence, real expenditures.
These have significant effects on the exchange rate level.
In the empirical section of this study, an attempt •^•Till
be made to provide an empirical analysis of some aspects
of the asset market approach to exchange rate theory.
Outline of the Study

The outline of this study is as follows: In Chapter 2,
the theoretical treatment of alternative models for
explaining short-run movement of exchange rates is discussed.
In particular, we take a look at the traditional theory of
exchange rate determination, which is based on relative
price levels and trade flows ; and also we examine the
modern theory, which is based on financial-equilibrium
models. Much of the survey focuses on the recent developments
of the financial-equilibrium models. Some critical evalua
tion of both theories is also made, to show the relative
pros and cons of the theories. The latter part of Chapter 2
focuses on the recent empirical literature and some
critiques of the models used.
The theoretical model is presented in Chapter 3. In
the first section the general features of a small country
model are presented, and the equilibrium exchange rate
derived. The equilibrium exchange rate depends on the
7
expected rate of depreciation of the domestic currency;

hence we examine the role of expectations on the movement
of the exchange rate, by imposing the requirement of
rational expectations. Imposing this requirement, we
realize that the current spot rate depends on current
variables of the financial and real sectors, as well as
on the current expectations concerning the future
behavior of these exogenous variables. With this model
developed, it is possible to introduce a distinction
between anticipated and unanticipated changes in exogenous
variables. First, we examine the effects of unanticipated
transitory monetary disturbance on the exchange rate.
Second, we look at the effects of unanticipated permanent
monetary disturbance; third, the effects of anticipated
transitory monetary disturbance and finally, the effects
of anticipated permanent monetary disturbance on the
exchange rate. The principal results are that unanticipated
monetary expansion leads to exchange depreciation; and
the anticipated monetary expansion causes the exchange
rate to continue to depreciate in an exponential manner
until the time the actual change occurs. In the second
section of Chapter 3, we extend the model from one
small country case to the more general two country
case, to examine the determinants of a bilateral exchange
8
rate and also to examine how the small country result

of monetary policy are changed, due to interaction
between countries.
In Chapter 4, we examine the empirical validity of a
simple asset market model of a bilateral exchange rate,
using the United States-Germany data, and also United
States-Netherlands data.
9
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Theories of the Exchange

Rate Determination
Significant progress has been made in the theoretical
analysis of exchange rate determination, since the
exchange rates began to float in 197?-. Their fluctuations
have resembled those of asset market prices, and these have
been dominated by factors prevailing in the financial
asset markets. Accordingly, attention has been directed
toward the role of the conditions in financial assets
markets,^ From this perspective, the exchange rate is
viewed as the relative price of different national
monies, and is determined by supply and demand conditions
of stocks of different national monies and other financial
assets.
Early attempts to investigate the determinants of the
exchange rate focused on the demand for supply of foreign
exchange and the price elasticities of import demands and
export supplies. The demand for foreign exchange in this
approach is determined by the value of imports and is
measured as a flow of foreign money. The supply of foreign
^This was established in the summary remarks to the

Stockholm conference on Flexible Exchange Rates and
Stabilization Policy contained in Scandinavian Journal of
Economics, 78, No. 2 (1976): 386-412.
10
exchange is determined by the value of one's exports and

is also measured as a flow of foreign money. The exchange
rate is therefore determined by the equilibrium condition
that demand for foreign exchange equals supply of foreign
exchange.
In the traditional approach, the focus is on the
behavior of imports and exports and the capital flows
between countries. This approach views the exchange
rate as the relative price of national output, as opposed
to relative price of national monies in the asset market
approach. It also assumes that the exchange rate is
determined by the conditions for equilibrium in the market
for flows of funds as opposed to conditions for equilibrium
in the market for stocks of assets as in the asset market
approach. The approach emphasizes covered interest
arbitrage, along with commercial hedging and speculation
in determining the equilibrium exchange rate. The theory
is based on a detailed description of the determinants of
the demand for and supply of forward and spot exchange
necessitated by each of these three operations in the
foreign exchange market.
There are many criticisms of the traditional approach.
For example, if we claim that a change in the exchange
rate affects the balance of payments because exchange rate
changes induce changes in the relative prices of domestic
11
and foreign goods, then that implies that the exchange

rate is the relative price of national outputs. However,
if we assume that the domestic and the foreign countries
produce identical and tradeable goods, and that purchasing
power parity holds for all commodities, then a depreciation
of the domestic currency will increase the domestic money
price of every good relative to the foreign money price
of that good, by the amount of the depreciation. But
there is no reason to believe that this change in nominal
prices should be associated with any particular change
in relative commodity prices. However, there are cases
when exchange rate changes have significant effect on
relative commodity prices, or that relative price changes
affect the balance of payments. But it is rather important
to note that these effects must occur through the impact
of these nominal price movements on the transactions
demand for money. For example, if a devaluation raises
the relative price of imports q = (SP*/P), and we assume that
a rise in the relative price of imports will reduce imports
and raise exports then this will induce expansion of
domestic output and a reduction in foreign output.
Hence, the transaction demand for domestic money rises
and the demand for foreign money falls. Consequently,
there will be a flow of exchange reserves from foreign
12
to domestic country and this is the mechanism by which

the balance of payments is affected.
Another source of criticism is that the traditional
approach emphasizes the conditions of markets for flow
of funds, and the effects of asset flows on asset stocks
are neglected. The implication of this is that, under a
fixed exchange rate regime a disequilibrium, caused by a
disturbance in the relative commodity prices, will lead
to a persistent divergence between the flow demand
for and the flow supply of foreign exchange. Since
the effects of assets flows on asset stocks are neglected,
these flows will persist, until one country runs out of
exchange reserves. On the other hand, in the asset market
approach, the equilibrium condition is that the demand
for the stock of each national asset must equal the stock
of that asset available. And hence, any observed flows
of funds do occur to correct the existing market dis-
equilibria, but are not considered as the basic determinant
of equilibrium.
Recently, asset market models have, therefore, been
developed to replace the traditional approach models. These
asset market models differ in many respects, but the main
emphasis is on the requirement that available stocks of
national monies and other financial assets must equal
stock demands for these assets as a necessary condition
13
for equilibrium. These models are usually single country

models, treating macroeconomic variables in the rest
of the world as predetermined.
A variety of assumptions have been made concerning
the number and the nature of financial assets and goods.
In one group of models, assets denominated in terms of
domestic and foreign currency are assumed to be perfect
substitutes. Therefore, in the analysis of the determina
tion of equilibrium in the financial markets it is
necessary to specify only the demands for and supplies
of monies. This is the approach used by Bilson (1978),
Dombusch (1976), Frenkel (1976), Hodrick (1978) and others.
In this approach, there is only one instrument of monetary
policy, the supply of money. An alternative group of
models differs from the monetarist model of exchange rate
determination, in that it does not assume that all other
assets but monies are perfect substitutes. It is therefore
necessary to specify the demands for and supplies of all
assets in the portfolio. These normally include a domestic
non-traded bond, which is issued by the domestic government
and a foreign traded bond which is denominated in foreign
currency and pays an exogenously given world rate of
interest. This approach is adopted by Kouri (1976),
Tumovsky (1976), Tumovsky and Kingston (1977) and
14
others. In this approach, two forms of moentary expansion,

an open market purchase of domestic bonds, and an open
market purchase of foreign exchange are considered and
compared. Some interesting qualitative results emerge
from these models. In the case of an open economy whose
residents hold domestic money, bonds denominated in domestic
currency units, and bonds denominated in foreign currency
units, it is generally established that the short run
effects of an expansionary monetary policy depend,
firstly, upon how an increase in money supply is created
(an open market operation, or by an exchange market
operation), and secondly upon the mode of deficit financing
employed by the government. An open market purchase of
domestic bonds by the monetary authorities causes the
domestic interest rate to fall, and also causes a depre
ciation of domestic currency. The domestic currency will
depreciate more: (a) the greater the substitutability
between domestic and foreign assets, (b) if the expectation
of asset holders is such that there would not be any
subsequent appreciation, (c) the smaller is the fraction
of domestic wealth held in the form of foreign currency
assets. Similarly the effects of exchange market
operation depends on asset substitutability, exnectational
forces and fraction of domestic wealth held in one form of
foreign currency assets. However, if the domestic and
15
foreign assets are perfect substitutes, then sterilized

intervention will have almost no impact on interest
rates or exchange rates. But a non-sterilized intervention
will have the same effects as an open-market operation by-
domestic monetary authorities. For the monetarist model,
a monetary expansion is shown to induce an immediate
depreciation in the exchange rate.
There are some major shortcomings of these models; too
little attention has been paid to the role of wealth
variables, and very little attention paid to the dynamics
of such models, and to analyzing the question of the various
impacts of different modes of government financing.
Incorporating these into the existing models is of interest
because these further analyses will provide some significant
insights into the time path of the exchange rate, following
a change in monetary policy.
Most of the existing literature focuses on the
comparative static properties of the model, either
in the short run, when all financial assets are assumed
to be predetermined, or in the long run steady state when
all accumulation has ceased, and capital stock variables
converge to long-run equilibrium values. Little emphasis
has so far been placed on dynamic macro models embodying
one asset market view of exchange rate determination.
Numerous dynamic processes are involved in the adjustment
16
from short run equilibrium to long run equilibrium,

for example, accumulation of assets over time, slow
adjustment of prices to variations in aggregate demand,
and changes in expectation over time. It seems worthwhile
to attempt to model this phenomenon, since it will
definitely shed some light on the exact movement of
exchange rates over time due to monetary disturbances.
Among the major contributions to dynamic analysis are
the works of Dombusch (1976), Kouri (1976) and Branson
(1976). Dombusch (1976) developed a theory of exchange
rate dynamics under perfect capital mobility, a slow
adjustment of goods markets relative to asset markets,
and consistent expectations. He focused on how a monetary
expansion affects the time paths of the exchange rate,
the domestic price level, and the domestic interest rate.
He shows that along a perfect foresight path, a monetary
expansion causes the exchange rate to depreciate, and also
shows that an initial overshooting of exchange rates occur
due to the differential adjustment speed of markets.
Kouri (1976) developed a simple dynamic model of the
determination of the exchange rate. He analyzed the role
of monetary asset equilibrium and expectations, and the
role of the process of asset accumulation in the determina
tion of the time path from momentary to long-run equilibrium.
His model supports the conclusion that monetary expansion
17
leads to currency depreciation in the short run; and that

the dynamic behavior of the exchange rate depends
critically on the nature of expectations formation.
Branson (1976) modified Kouri's analysis by endogenizing
the interest rate on domestic interest bearing assets,
which Kouri assumed to be fixed in his analysis.
These studies in a dynamic framework have led to
some interesting theoretical insights about exchange
rate fluctuations. A familiar conclusion from each of
these models is that monetary expansion leads to exchange
rate depreciation. However, there are no clear cut
conclusions on the effects of fiscal policy on exchange
rates; these effects depend upon how the government deficit
is financed. In recent studies, some attention has been
devoted to the question of the time path of exchange
rates, following a change in monetary policy. Important
contributions came from Dombusch (1976), Kouri (1976),
and Branson (1976). Dombusch and Kouri conclude that
the impact effect of a monetary expansion on the spot
exchange rate will be that in the short run the exchange
rate will overshoot the long run equilibrium exchange
rate. Further, Dombusch shows that overshooting may
occur even when exchange rate expectations show perfect
foresight. It is clear from Dombusch's analysis that
when domestic goods prices are sticky, the spillover
18
effect of disequilibrium in the market for domestic goods

created by an unexpected monetary disturbance required
that the actual change in the exchange rate exceed the
change in the equilibrium rate. Mussa (1979) argued that
such overshooting behavior occurs only in response to an
unanticipated monetary disturbance, and not in response
to expected monetary changes or to any form of real
distrubance.
Also, Mussa (1979) and Dombusch (1976) have shown
that there are divergences of exchange rates and national
price levels from purchasing power parity, during the
process of adjustment to a new long run equilibrium
following a monetary change that disrupts an initial long-
run equilibrium. Mussa in his analysis arrives at the
conclusion that the exchange rate plays an essential role
in adjusting the relative price of national outputs to
actual and expected changes in the real factors that
determine the equilibrium values of this relative price;
and that such relative price changes are necessarily
associated with divergences from purchasing power parity.
Secondly, he shows that if the price of domestic goods is
sticky; then unexpected changes in the equilibrium value
of this price induced by purely monetary disturbances
will spill over onto the exchange rate and induce
temporary divergences from purchasing power parity.
19
These results however, are based on simplified models

that heavily obscure the underlying economic structure.
More elaborate models will help us better appreciate
the sensitivity of exchange rates to various economic
policies.
Empirical Literature
Since exchange rates began to float in 1972, their
movements seem to have been dominated by monetary conditions.
This has stimulated several attempts to apply the asset
market model empirically in order to explain the exchange
rates of the major currencies. Most of the studies
derive exchange-rate equation by manipulating money market
equilibrium conditions. Studies by Bilson (1978), Frenkel
(1976), Girton and Roper (1977) and Hodrick (1978)
follow this approach.
Frenkel's model is based on the assumption in
hyperinflation periods. During the German hyperinflation,
for example, relative price movement swamped all other
influences on German exchange rates. Over periods of
time long enough for ratios of national price indexes to
change radically, purchasing power parity may have
considerable validity, but has been discredited as a short
run hypothesis in more general circumstances. Bilson
(1978) presented a model of exchange rate determination
20
combining elements of the efficient market and monetary

approaches to asset markets. The efficient market
characteristics consist of purchasing power parity,
interest rate parity, the Fisher equation from intertemporal
arbitrage in assets, and the rational expectations
assumptions on prices and exchange rates.
These empirical analyses, in attempting to explain
short run exchange rate determinants, have considered
the effects of different monetary policy measures, the
impact of foreign monetary variables, and the influence
of real sector variables. In addition, there have been
some successful attempts to incorporate the effects of
expectational forces. Generally, empirical results
have been found to be consistent with the asset market
approach to exchange rate determination.
There are a number of problems in the estimation
process. Empirical portfolio balance models require
data on global stocks of outside assets not held by official
agencies, broken down by currency denomination. These
are data that at present are partially confidential and
difficult to assemble. Secondly, availability of
statistical data for measures of foreign wealth is not
adequate, and hence these variables are dropped from
exchange rate equations. There is some question whether
this will seriously bias the results of the regression
21
analysis. Thirdly, the models in existence assume that

exchange rates are permitted to float freely, while in
fact governments still intervene in foreign exchange markets
from time to time in order to achieve a managed float.
This suggests that there may be some reverse causality
running from exchange rates to money, at least in the
short run. This means that the exchange rate model may
not be a completely accurate description of existing
exchange rate regimes. Finally, quarterly data may not
be suitable for testing what is essentially a model of
long run equilibrium. Quarterly data are short run data.
As such they may be dominated by transitory dynamic
adjustment phenomena that are absent in long run static
equilibrium. Annual data are more appropriate for testing
an equation that is based on assumptions of interest
rate parity, monetary equilibrium, goods market equilibrium
and purchasing power parity for traded goods, real income
exogeneity, and undirectional causality between money and
exchange rates. A solution would be to augment the model
with additional equations and variables to represent dynamic
adjustment processes. This might permit the specification
of short run influence affecting the exchange rate.
A number of unresolved problems still exist in
attempting to explain the determinants of exchange rates.
First, the asset market equilibrium model does not provide
22
a complete theory of exchange rates determination, because

most of the explanatory variables are endogenous, except
in the very short run. Second, the asset market approach
does not claim that the exchange rate is determined
entirely in the asset market. The exchange rate together
with other macroeconomic variables are determined in a
general equilibrium framework by the interaction of flow
and stock conditions. Therefore, the asset market
equilibrium relationship that is used in the analysis
may be viewed as a reduced form relationship, chosen
as a convenient framework. The model may be too simple
to capture all the influences on the exchange rate. The
theory underlying the analysis may be correct, even though
its empirical form is inadequate to fit the facts.
The preceding paragraphs have pointed to some of
the shortcomings of the existing asset market models
for analyzing the process of exchange rate determination.
There is also scope for additional analysis of the static
and dynamic portfolio balance models. More consideration
needs to be given to the treatment of the impact of the
growth of wealth on the exchange rate movements. It is
also necessary to assess both anticipated and unanticipaf"'
monetary policy measures within the realm of instruments
oriented toward the various targets of the government's
economic policy.
_ m
be etnp "1-3 #
tnoneta Nr^;ïg? -C-
of the
Dombu ; ^ <#'. 4'
(1976)
The Di I V
empiri -:
polici
analys
repere <'^^-^-2.
are ig ^ e -
of thé ^13?-
countr :i'
emoiri
?SSS35P5
count: \
V
on tn.c > ^ ~zM
L
[ggsgTiss- - - The dc 3,
single
!==
23
The ideal approach for this study will be to deal

with all these problems, but that is impossible in the
framework of a tractable analytical model. The focus
will be directed to analyzing the role of asset market
equilibrium, goods market equilibrium, and expectations
in the determination of the exchange rate in the short
run, and then to analyze the effects of monetary disturbances;
particularly to examine the effects of anticipated and
unanticipated monetary expansions on the exchange rate.
The empirical analysis will employ the model developed,
and data from the flexible exchange rate period.
24
CHAPTER 3. THE THEORETICAL MODEL
This chapter presents the basic methodology to

be employed in an attempt to explain the effects of
monetary policies on the exchange rate. The formulation
of the present model reflects the recent developments by
Dombusch (1976), Dombusch and Fischer (1980), Frenkel
(1976), Kouri (1976), Mussa (1976, 1979) and others.
The primary objective is to examine theoretically and
empirically the interrelationships between monetary
policies and the exchange rate. In Section 1, the
analysis focuses on a small country, meaning that
repercussion effects associated with the monetary policies
are ignored. In Section 2, we will expand the framework
of the analysis to include repercussion effects in a two
country model. The purpose is to obtain a model for the
empirical analysis to be carried out in Chapter 4.
General Features of the

Small Country Model
The analysis in this section focuses on a small
country in the sense that the country exerts no influence
on the foreign prices of goods and financial assets.
The domestic country is at full employment, produces a
single tradeable good, prices are flexible and output
25
is fixed. We have the competitive arbitrage assumption

about prices that
P = SP*
where P is the domestic money price of the domestic

good, S is the price of a unit of the foreign currency
in terms of domestic money, and P* is the foreign
currency price of the domestic tradeable good, which by
the small country assumption is taken to be exogenously
determined.
The model of the financial sector is derived from
Dombusch and Fischer (1980), and Dombusch's (1976)
framework. Dombusch (1976) assumed that the demand
for money is independent of wealth variables. We will
deviate somewhat from Dombusch's approach by incorpo
rating a portfolio balance view of the asset markets
and a wealth constraint into the model. We shall assume
that two financial assets are held in the portfolios
of the domestic private sector; domestic money held
only by domestic residents and denominated in domestic
currency; and foreign currency denominated bonds which
can be held by domestic residents. For simplicity,
bonds are taken to be perpetuities. It is also assumed
that the monetary authorities of the foreign country
26
issue the bonds. The foreign bonds are index bonds

each yielding one unit of foreign output per unit of
time. At each point in time, individuals allocate
their stock of real wealth between on the one hand,
bonds and on the other hand, money. Following Dombusch
and Fischer (1980), real wealth is then defined as the
sum of the real value of money balances and the real
bond holdings:
where W is the private sector real wealth, M is the stock

of domestic money holdings of the private sector, A is
the number of income streams from assets accruing to the
domestic residents, each yielding one unit of foreign
output per unit of time, and r* is the exogenously
determined world real interest rate, and hence A/r*
is the real bond holdings. The domestic monetary
authorities also hold some of these bonds, and conduct
open market operation with these bonds.
Let r* be the real interest rate on foreign bonds.
It is assumed that the expected rate of domestic
inflation ir, is equal to the expected rate of currency
depreciation x; that is, prices abroad are assumed fixed
27
or stable. The assumption of perfect capital mobility

together with these relations implies r = r*. Then
i = r* + X (3)
where i is the domestic nominal interest rate, and x is

the expected rate of depreciation of the domestic
currency. The alternative cost of holding assets denominated
in terms of domestic currency is the condition stated in
Equation 3. .
The demand for money as a proportion of wealth
depends negatively on the alternative cost of holding
money, r* + x, and positively on real output; which
reflects transactions demand.
^ = 8(r* + X, Y)U (4)
Substituting Equation 2 into Equation 4 yields
M _ 6(r* + X, Y) A (5)
F 1 - 0(r* + X, Y)
and hence
p • L(Y, r* + x) > 0, < 0 (6)

28
Given the nominal money supply, M, the price level

depends on the value of bond holdings, A. An increase
in the return stream to the perpetuities raises wealth
and hence the demand for real balances. Equilibrium in
the money market therefore requires a rise in the real
money supply given x. For a given level of M, the
price level P then has to fall. An increase in real
output raises transactions, this requires an increase
in the demand for real balances to finance these transac
tions, and hence leads to a rise in the real money supply
to establish money market equilibrium. For a given level
of M, the price level falls in order to achieve equilibrium.
A rise in the foreign real rate of return, r* reduces the
equilibrium real money stock for two reasons, first
because it lowers the share of real balances individuals
are willing to hold in their portfolio, and secondly,
because it lowers the level of real wealth and hence, the
desired demand for real balances. For a given stock of
money, a reduction in equilibrium real money stock means
a rise in the price level.
The dynamics of the system with a flexible exchange
rate are given by the condition that the balance of payments
is in equilibrium. Hence, excess of income over spending
is the rate at vîch we are acquiring claims on the rest
of the world, A/r*, hence
29
^ - Y + A - E(Y + A, p + (7)
Where E is real expenditures, and it depends on real

income and real wealth.
Specifying the real money demand function in the
conventional way, we have
g = AYê-^(^* + (r*)-^ (8)
Using Equations 1 and 8, we can solve for the equilibrium

exchange rate level specified in logarithms in Equation"9
below; where s is the logarithm of the exchange rate.
s = m - a - Y y + \r* +(tinCr*) 4- xx - p* (9)
Without any loss of generality, let us assume that
xr* + ln(r*) = 5r*, hence Equation 9 becomes
s = m - a - Y y + gr* + Xx - p* (10)
The lower case letters are used to denote logarithm of
the variables. The model establishes that an increase
in the domestic money supply, holding all other variables
constant, causes an excess supply of money which results
in an equiproportionate depreciation of the home currency.
An increase in the value of foreign bond holdings raises
real wealth, and hence the demand for real money balances.
30
For a given stock of domestic money, the price level

falls to maintain money market equilibriimi. A fall
in the domestic price level leads to an appreciation
in the spot exchange rate to maintain purchasing power
parity. A rise in real output stimulates the demand
for real money balances, and consequently causes a
fall in the price level. This leads to exchange rate
appreciation to maintain purchasing power parity. An
increase in the foreign real interest rate reduces real
balances, raises the domestic price level, and hence
causes a depreciation of the exchange rate. An increase
in the expected rate of depreciation raises the domestic
interest rate, and hence reduces the demand for real
balances. The domestic price level consequently rises,
and hence the exchange rate has to depreciate to maintain
purchasing power parity. The anticipation of deprecia
tion induces an actual depreciation of the domestic
currency. Finally, a one time increase in the foreign
currency price of tradeable goods, given monetary
and fiscal policies, and exchange rate expectations
causes the exchange rate to appreciate by the same
proportion, so that the domestic currency price of
tradeables remains unchanged.
31
The Role of Expectations

The equilibrium described in the above section
depends on the expected rate of depreciation of the
domestic currency. Dombusch (1976) assumed that the
expected rate of change in the exchange rate is a linear
function of the current and long-run values of the
exchange rate, and then verified that the actual path
will satisfy this relation. In this study, this expec-
tational variable is made endogenous by imposing the
requirement of rational expectations. As Tumovsky and
Kingston (1977) pointed out, any expectational hypothesis
is necessarily to some extent arbitrary, but the rational
expectations hypothesis does have the important advantage
of being the one hypothesis which yields forecasts which
are consistent with predictions of the model. And for
that reason it is of considerable interest,
x^ in Equation 10 is the expected rate of depreciation
of the domestic currency. By first order approximation^
Xt = Et^®t+1 3%) (11)
where S^_j_j^(S^) is the logarithm of the forward (Spot)

exchange rate, and E^ [ j denotes the expectations
^See Appendix 2 for explanation.

32
operator and it is based on the information available to

asset holders at that time. Substituting Equation 11
into Equation 8 and solving for yields
^t = m I® - ^t - ^^t + ^r*t + 'Ê^CSt+i) - P*t] (12)
The current exchange rate is strongly influenced by

expectations of its future value and is dependent on
information that underlies these expectations. It is
important to specify how this expectational variable is
determined. Imposing the requirements of rational
expectations, we obtain
2t(St+i) - m^tf™t+i • *t+i • Y^t+i + *r*t+i
+ AEt+i(St+2) - P*t+i] (13)
Note that
^t^"t+l^®t+2^^ = Et(St+2) also
^t^®t+2^ I+r^t^™t+2 ".^t+2 " "^yt+2 '^^*t+2
(14)
33
Substituting Equation 14 into 13 and applying the same

procedure iteratively to and so on, we obtain
the expression
+ (15)
provided that Lim ~^

R-yoo
meaning that the exchange rate cannot be expected to run

off to zero or to infinity. Substituting Equation 15
into Equation 12 yields
^t = ITr^®t - at -
j=l
- *t+j yyt+j + (16)
This is the rational expectations solution for the

equilibrium exchange rate. We realize that the current
equilibrium exchange rate depends on the current monetary
and real variables, as well as on the current expectations
concerning the future behavior of these exogenous
monetary and real variables. Let us also note that our
model satisfies the homogeneity postulate. An increase
34
in the nominal quantity of money that is expected to

persist leads to an equiproportionate increase in the
equilibrium exchange rate level. This is because money
is the only nominal asset; the index bonds are real,
not nominal assets.
Examining Equation 15 we recognize that monetary
and fiscal policies affect expectations of future
exchange rates. This leads to the fact that predictions
of future exchange rates based solely on interest-rate-
parity conditions can be highly inaccurate, because
expected future exchange rates are influenced by expected
monetary and fiscal policies as well.
Explanation for Exchange Rate Volatility

In the past years, exchange rates have exhibited
wider fluctuations than had been expected, and some
attention has been devoted to explaining the causes of
this short-run volatility. Perspectives on volatility
are provided by Schafer (1976), Dombusch (1976), Kouri
(1976) and Branson (1976).
Exchange rate volatility may be attributed to the
fact that expectations about future exchange rates are
imprecise. Insights into why expectations are imprecise
and thus, into why observed exchange rates have been so
volatile can be obtained from the model developed in
35
this section. Rewriting Equation 15 here for con

venience,
- m - ®t+j - ^^c+j +
We recognize that today's expectations of tomorrow's

exchange rate depend on the current expectations of the
entire future time paths of both the money supply and
all variables that influence money demand. Consequently,
to the extent that expectations of these time paths are
imprecise and subject to sudden shifts (e.g., when newly
available economic data differ from earlier predictions
and lead to revised expectations about the money supply
path that the central monetary authority will pursue),
both exchange rate expectations and observed exchanged
rates will also be subject to sudden shifts.
This analysis suggests that changes in expectations
about policy variables may be an important cause of
exchange rate volatility. Consequently, making information
available would allow market participants to predict
more accurately the time paths of policy variables,
or pursuing smoother time paths of policy variables,
should reduce exchange rate volatility to some extent.
36
Secondly, the analysis suggests that we would expect a

positive correlation between the error term (that is the
difference between the observed policy variable and the
forecast of the policy variable), and the observed exchange
rates. This hypothesis can be empirically tested. In
order to carry out this, we need to observe that the
money supply in a given period is made up of an anticipated
component, which the individual predicts based upon all
the available information, plus a random unanticipated
component, which can be positive, negative, or zero.
This represents actual money supply deviations from the
expected money supply. Let us approximate the imprecision
in the expectations of the time paths of the exogenous
policy variables by the money supply deviation from the
expected money supply. We would then expect this residual
to be positively correlated with the observed exchange
rates. This test will be carried out in Chapter 4.
The model developed in this section will be used to
examine the effects of anticipated and unanticipated
monetary disturbances on the exchange rate level. These
results will be empirically tested in the fourth chapter.
To achieve this, the money supply has to be forecasted.
The predicted values will constitute the anticipated
•money supply component and the residuals will represent
the unanticipated component. These components will be
37
used to test the theoretical results to be obtained in

the next section.
Wealth variables are not completely predetermined.
Bonds are perfectly mobile, and hence, any gap in the
domestic trade balance must be filled up with bond flows.
Hence, domestic net exports plus interest on foreign
bonds equals net foreign bond issues to the domestic
country. These bond flows in connection with current
account surpluses makes the wealth variable endogenous.
The analysis will focus on the short-run comparative
statics of the system, under two conditions:
(a) Partial rational expectations, under which
agents treat A as exogenous, i.e.
but the actual A changes according to Equation 7.
(b) Full rational expectations, under which A is
recognized as endogenous.
Purchasing power parity which we assume obtains
continuously, implies that we can use the domestic
price level or the exchange rate interchangeably, since
the movements in the two variables are the same. If A^
is treated as exogenous by agents, then the time path
of the price level can be obtained from the money market
equilibrium condition stated in Equation 11. Note that
X = - P^ and hence we have
38
xPt+1 - (1 + x)p^ = (17)
where e^ represents all the other variables. Solving

for in Equation 17 we obtain
Pt - - ^t+i + (18)
a + 1)
Note that this solution is the same as in Equation 16.
If is recognized as endogenous, its time ptah Ls then
governed by Equation 7, which is written here for
convenience ;
- Y + A - E(Y + A, ^
= H(Y,A,|,r*) > 0, < 0
< 0. V 0
P
An independent increase in real output raises real expendi

tures, but assuming a marginal propensity to consume of
less than unity, part of the increased real output leads
to foreign asset accumulation. An increase in A above
its stationary state value leads to foreign asset
decumulation, because the increase in A leads to an
increase in real wealth which results in increased
expenditures. An increase in real balances raises real
39
wealth and hence, real expenditures, and this leads to

foreign asset decximulation. An independent increase
in the foreign real interest rate, induces agents to
shift out of money and into bonds, but decreases real
wealth, and hence, expenditures. This leads to net
accumulation.
Let us define
= Total (private plus government)
holding of foreign assets
= Government holding of foreign assets
= Private holding of foreign assets
= The purchase by the Government at time
t of real securities.
hence
Bt = Gt + A^
^t = ^t-1
At a given time, t, B^ is given, i.e..
dB_ dA.
32^ - 0, but 32^ - -1.
Now let us assume that saving is proportional to any

discrepancy between desired and actual wealth, and that
desired wealth is solely a function of real output.
40
and hence, the net accumulation of foreign assets is

given by
\+l • ®t " ®o " Sf^t - Gf + - P^]
or
^t+l + *t+l - = ep - gAj - gMj + gPj
taking logs on both sides we approximately obtain
®t+l - bo^t = ®o + - Zt+1: bo = (1 - S)'

This is the discrete-time form of Equation 7, and
da^ 0 for i f 0
-1 for i = 0
where dZ®^^^ is the change (in expectation) of open

market purchase. Hence, if is recognized as endogenous,
we have two simultaneous difference equations to solve
for the time paths of and A^. The system becomes:
Xpt^l - (1 + %)pt - " ~®1 ~ ®t (19)
at+i - bo^t - SPt'®o - - ^t+1 (20)
These two equations, 19 and 20, can be collapsed into one

equation to obtain either
41
=2^t+2 + "l^t+1 + = [eo-(l-bo)ei] + (bo-g^^t-^t+l'^t+l
or
=2^t+2 + ""l^t+l + Soft =-(Go + g®l> + ^8(™t - *t+l)
+ (1 + X)Zt+i - XZt+2
To obtain rational expectations solutions for the price

level and the level of foreign assets, conjecture at a
solution of the form
CO • 00 • 00
Pt = + Yina^+ir^ + ïzOTt+i®'' + ^3
o o o
Y4ZZt+l+iG "^5^1^ ^6®2^ (21)
and
00 . CO , 00
Gt = *o + *l^™t+i""'' $2™t+i^'' ^s^^t+l+i^""

o o o
OO
+ *4^^t4-l4-i^^ *5®1 *6® (22)

o 2
where r and s are the roots obtained from the equation

2
"2 °1^ = 0 where
= -(1 + X + Xb^)
Oq = (1 + %)bo - g
42
and
(1 - b^)e^ -
" 1+g - b
y _ r(bQ - g) - 1
1 D
bp - g
(1 + X)bQ - g
-r
^3 D
Y _ r 1
4 - D - CI + X)b^ - g
2
-«1 ± /Xoi - 4*^02)
= z;;
D = ta + X + ib^)^ - 4i(b^ + ib^ - g)]l/2
%=è
gei + e,
*0 - 1 + g - b
•1 = - '•I +
43
*2 = (1 + xî -Z-g - *1
•3 = Y3(' - % +
_ 1+ X
^^4 - (1 + x)b^ - g - *3
"^5 ~ YsfAGl - (1 + X)]
<t>^ - Ï5[^92 " ]
The determination of these coefficients are fully discussed

in Appendix 3.
The problem with this solution is that Max[|r|, |s|] =
IrI >1 for all X, and and hence the solution does
not converge. To solve this, let us define M* such that
l(Mt+i - M*)k^
o
exists, and we assume converges. Where k = max[|r|, |s|]

and suppose r > 1 > s > 0. Let = (M^ - M*), hence
O O . 0 0
z(M ,. - M*)r~ = zV ..r^ converges. For example, if

o ^ o
= M* for all t > t, then the above converges thus
XP^_P2 - (1 + %)?% - = -V^ - (e^ + m*) (23)

44
^t+1 - - ^t+1 + (24)
Then for the solution, we obtain
ft = To + YlSVc+iri + + YgZZc+i+iri
o o
+ YsZ^t+l+i^ ^758^1 + (25)
^t = *0 + + *2:Vc+iS^ + fszZt+l+i?^
0 0 0
" i t t
+ 'J>4^^t+H-i® ^ *58 1 "i'6® 2 (26)
o
where in Equation 25,
(l-bo)e^ - e^
To = ** i + g - bo
The values of y-^ through and 4)^ through 41^ are the
same as given before.1'2
Then for r > 1 > s,1021 > 1 and convergence requires
^6 " ^6 " solution obtained in Equations 25 and 26
gives the time paths of the price level and the level
^The relationship between 4)^ and Yc is derived in

Appendix 4.
2If ^t+1
— is a constant, the model could be extended to
the case where there is a steady state positive money growth
rate.
45
of foreign assets a^, for I ^ t given expectations at t,

and the level of foreign assets a^ at time t. If
expectations are fulfilled, it will be the actual solution.
Suppose at some I ^ t, expectations are revised, then
and are revised. The new solution must be
convergent and must satisfy the initial condition, i.e.,
a^ is unchanged but Pj jumps. Hence, we must recalculate
Equations 25 and 26 for the new V and Z and choose
and such that the initial condition for a^ is
satisfied.
From the two roots of the quadratic equation
2 °1 "2
«2 + a2^ + a^r = 0, we have r + s = — and rs = —.
This implies that if r > 1 > s > 0, then = (1 + %)bQ - g > 0
and therefore we can establish the following a priori
restrictions.
Yl < 0, Y2 > 0, Y3 < 0, > 0
4)1 > 0, <}>2 > 0, *3 > 0, *4 > 0
It is also possible that r < -1 and 0 < s < 1 in which
case Oq = (1 + - g < 0. This implies that b < ^ + x
or g = 1 - b > 2 + X' hence, the greater the interest
semielasticity of demand for money, X, the greater the
marginal propensity to consume out of wealth, g. Since
the homogenous solution is 0^^ = r~^, if r < -1 this
implies oscillatory behavior of prices and foreign
assets.
46
If r < -1, and 0 < s < 1, then our a priori restric

tions on the parameters will be as follows:
Yl, Y2' ^3' ^4 ^ 0

4^ < 0, *2 > 0, *2 < 0 and 4^ > 0
For the homogenous solution in both cases (when r > 1,
and r < -1) we have,
<J>5 -*5? V
Y = =
0^^ - (1 + A) (1 + x)r - X
Therefore sign (y^) = - sign (4^).

Now suppose, at t = 0, expectations are revised
either due to an immediate (unanticipated) change in
the money supply M or in government bond holdings, G, or
due to an anticipated change in M or G, we will obtain
w . . 00 .
da.Q =~d.Z^ = "h ^2^ )dV ^ ^4^ )dZ
o o
00 CO .
d^5 = - [ à Z ^ + E(*iri + <},2S^)dV^ + zt^gr^ +
o o
and -Yc = *^5^ implies dyr = +-r

^\r _-\]d4s
3 X - r(l + X) ^ U + X D
Hence given =r and da^ = -dZ^, then for da^,

for t > 0 we have
p.
S- 5p. rt
p>
r—« O
H-
M8 rt
8- + 1
a>
I
p.
ïnn> p. rt
O M 8 O M I
o M 8 M
rt
O
N
O
N M
p.
•e- o + a> -»
-o- W -e- rt Ln
ti O M
w
•6- rt M 8 rt
H
""ii -e-
n
M
MH» •o-
M
O M 8 +
% M 1
H CD
-e-
a» O M 8
+ H-
rt
M
M rt
-e- •e-
K> •e- -e- rt •o- + M H- M
4> 4> O M I Ni M
CO
Ui CO CO •e-
N)
0 M V + O M S M
H'
•e- H-
N3 V-/ CO •e- -o-
î. CO p. H- M N> +
S- <! M CO H
H» -e-
m <5- H'
t.
&(b ?
rt
+
<!
(D +
H-
s_x
p.
<î
+
N>
CO
H*
H- H*
I •O" -e- n> •o-

to + + N>
CO
rt ho
CO
P;
CO
O M 8 o M 8 rt M 8 it v-yH- n>
î. /-s +
•O- -e- •e-
w w l
w
H H H l oM8
H* +
-e-
+ + w + o M8
H
-e- -e- O M Y
, O M 8 •ô-
•OCO
•©•
H /-s C*3
(O CO -e- •O- M
H' <jO
H %
CL
pu p. H •O
CS) N N CO
(D (D (D + 4>
•e-
H
I +
H"
•O"
CO
g-
H
+
s*
n>
-e-
CO
S-
n> %
CO
5n>
(D
48
Therefore,
da^ = E (f^r^ +
o
t-1 s .
+ I (o^r + <i)^s )dz
+ + *2S^) - + 4,2S^'''^)}dV^^_^j.
+ [E{(*3ri + - 8t\(*3rt+^ + <{.45^"^^)
Further simplification leads to
t t ^ .
da^ = -dzê 2 - G Z (o^r + (^2^ )dv ^
o
t-1 . .
+ E ($3%^ 4)48 )dz 2+^]
o
o^^2® ^
" i ^3 r^ t ^ 3 t e
z[*4s +1-9 i(^(^nr^ ® ^^^z
49
da^ = E (*1%^ + <j,2S^)dv®^

o
t-1 . i e
+ Z (Ogr + )dz
o
+ I[*2sl(l - + +4si(l - ..(|)^)dz®t+i+l^ (26a)

o
This is the change in a^ (for t ^ 0) due to a change in

expectations (or unanticipated policy) at t = 0.
Similarly, we have
dPt = dy^ + [z{(Y]^r^ + Y2S^)dv^t+i ^
+ eSdy
l^TS
Note that
dy^ = and hence we have
dPt = dy^ + i l i y ^ r ^ + y2s'')dv^t+i + (^3?^ +

o
+ «"l'a+Or - + r{(^jr^ + •2s'-)<iv®j
+ (•jr^ +
50
Further simplification leads to
rdz r C-1 . i _
d^t = aYo+[(l+x)r - l+[ ^ (+1? + *2"
t-1 i i. e
+ Z (*3? +<j>4S )dz i+il[(i+^)r -
+(z[(4irt+i + 'J'2S^'^^)dv®^^^
o
+ zECyi?^ + Y2S^)dv^t+i
o
and hence
rdz t-1 . .
dPj = dy^ + - %]» 1 +([ I (*1^ + +2= i
t-1 . - reî
+ Z (*3r + " ,]
" -i -î ^^r^ ^ ^^r(—) •

+ ziYiri + Tzsi) + ,+((!+,)/_ ,)s^)]dv\+.
, . 4'or^'^^ i|),r(S.)^
+ z[(Y3r + Y4S ) +((i+x)r _ % + ((l4-x)r - :\^®^^^^%+l+i
grouping the terms together leads to

51
rdz t-1 . -
= dY. + t(l+l)r - 1 + [ I («If + *2: i
+ Y(+3ri + ,]
*ir i <l>2^(§)^ i _
+ :[((l+x)r - X + Yl) r + ("^2 + (i+A)r - t+i
" ^3^" i 4"/^(—) .

+ :[((l+x)r - X + Y3)r + (^4 + (l+x)r - x^® t+l+i
Note that .-[Xm^l
and ^ [ a±il^,
and hence,
Cl + X )r - X + - 0
and
*3% + ^3 = 0
(1+ X )r - X
52
Thus:
rdz t-1
dP^ = dm* + 8 i[(i+%)r _ +[ Z (41?! + *28
i i e 1
4- I (*3? + )dz i+in(i+x)r -
" 4>2^(f")^ i e
+ ^^(^2 + (l+x)r - 7?^ t+i
<i>4r(§)^ i g
+ (^4 + (l+x)r - x)^ t+l+i (26b
This is the change in due to change in expectations at

t = 0 (or policy at t = 0). Also note that for t = 0,
t-1
E =0. Equations 26a and 26b will be used to analyze
i=0
the effects of monetary policies under rational expectations.
The above model is similar to the model of Dombusch
and Fischer (1980) in some respects. However, their study
emphasizes the relationship between the behavior of the
exchange rate and the current account. In particular,
they look at how the current account through its effects
on net asset positions, and therefore on assets markets,
determines the path of the exchange rate over time. The
purpose of this study is to examine the effects of
anticipated and unanticipated monetary disturbances on
the exchange rate and to test the derived results.
53
The main concern in subsequent sections is to analyze

both the short run and the steady state effects of various
types of monetary disturbances. The short run effects will
be related to the steady state effects, and hence it
is convenient to focus first on the latter.
Steady State
The steady state of the system is attained when all
accumulation ceases and the expected rate of exchange
depreciation is zero. Balance of trade will be zero
and demand for money will be equal to the supnly of money.
For either monetary policy, this is described by the set
of equations:
= 8(Y, r*)(g + ^ (27)
#9? = Y - E(Y, g + §e) = 0 (28)
Equation 27 is the money market equilibrium condition,

and Equation 28 is the current account equation, which
asserts that in the steady state equilibrium, real income
and real expenditures, E, are equalized, and hence
foreign asset accumulation equals zero. The variables
A and M/P are endogenous in the long run, and are
determined by Equations 27 and 28. By taking the total
54
differentials of the two equilibrium conditions, 27 and 28

we obtain the following system of equations:
W[eydY + 8^*dr*] + 0d(^) + edX^) - d(^) = 0
dy]- EydY - Ewd(^) - Ewd(^) = 0
For given levels of Y and r*
1
1
9-1 ^
-E
-Ew r* dA
M =0, dA = 0 in the steady state.

and hence d(p) Consequently,
a policy of pure monetary expansion leads to an equipropor-
tionate increase in the price level in the long run (and
short run). A 1% increase in the nominal money supply will
lead to a 1% increase in the price level and hence a 1%
increase in the exchange rate. Real income, and real
wealth will remain unchanged, as will the domestic interest
rate.
In the steady state, private security holdings are
unchanged, dA = 0. An open market operation which is
an increase in the money supply brought about by purchasing
privately held securities results in an overshooting of
55
the exchange rate, and hence a reduction in real wealth.

This leads to balance of trade surplus and therefore an
accumulation of foreign assets. As the foreign assets
are accumulated the exchange rate falls; with A increasing,
and with the exchange rate falling the trade surplus
decreases. The process continues until the initial real
equilibrium is reattained. At that point the exchange
rate will have depreciated, since the nominal money supply
is higher while all real variables are unchanged. The
cumulative effect of the monetary expansion is thus
clearly an equiproportionate depreciation, but only across
steady states.
The effect of an independent increase in x* can be
obtained from the following system of equations:
W8r*dr* + 0d(^) + ^ dA - ^dr* - d(g) = 0
-E (d(p)) - dA + dr* - 0
w £ 1. 2:*
and hence
r-
6-1 d(f)
' (0A _ ) dr*
-Ew V
-Ew dA dr*
_ _ r*
!
56
d($) E^p0r*/r*
= W8^* < 0
dr* -E.
w (0-1) +
w
and
E A
dA ,
- V'f*
^(s-1)
= (——^ - W9 ^ ) r * > 0
Y*
An independent increase in the foreign interest rate reduces
the equilibrium real money stock both because it lowers the
preferred share of real balances in wealth and because it
reduces the level of real wealth. With real balances
comprising a smaller fraction (and hence with realTassets
comorising a larger fraction) of wealth, we tnust have
an increase in the equilibrium price level and thus a
depreciation of the exchange rate.
Short Run Analysis

In this model, it is possible to introduce a distinc
tion between anticipated changes in exogenous variables
based on previously available information, and unanticipated
changes in exogenous variables due to the receipt of new
information. The analysis of the anticipated changes is
57
an attempt to explain the impact of an increase in the

money supply, for example, when the increase is announced
prior to the actual increase. This type of analysis is
of interest because it shows how a lag in the implementation
of a policy affects the economy before and after the policy
is carried out. This analysis is done following the
procedure originally outlined by Fischer (1979).
Two forms of government monetary policies are
considered and compared:
(a) Open market operation: an operation in
which the central bank increases money
supply by buying government bonds from
the private individuals.
(b) Pure monetary expansion: this involves
injection of new money into the system.
This happens when budget deficits are
covered by money issue.
The initial effect of the open market purchase leaves
the total wealth unaffected, and hence has no direct wealth
effect on expenditures for real commodities. This operation
creates an excess supply of money and an equivalent
excess demand for bonds. For any particular means of
increasing the money supply, the short run effects of the
policy change depend critically on the response of
expectations. Given our assumption of perfect capital
58
mobility, i.e., interest rate parity, our interest rate

can be low when appreciation is anticipated or high if
there is an expectation of depreciation. Thus, the
variable x^ plays the same role as the domestic interest
rate in a conventional short run closed economy model.
Monetary expansion, on the other hand, does not involve
the removal of financial assets from the private sector
but instead entails the inji ection of new money into the
system, and thus increases the net wealth holdings of the
private individuals.
Specifically, we shall consider the following monetary
disturbances under the two forms of monetary policies
specified above:
(a) Unanticipated Transitory Disturbance: Its
effect on the exchange rate will be represented
TU
dm^ The superscript indicates the type
of monetary disturbance.
(b) Unanticipated Permanent Disturbance: represented
ds. PU
^3g
(c) Anticipated Transitory Disturbance:
às
(d) Anticipated Permanent Disturbance: PA
59
In the analyses that follow, subscripts will be put on

the above differentials to indicate the type of monetary
policy: omo for open market operation and ME for pure
monetary expansion by injection of new money. The purpose
of these analyses is to explore the similarities and
differences between open market operation and the issue
of new money under flexible exchange rates.
Unanticipated transitory monetary disturbance

In this section we investigate the impact of an
increase in only the current period's money supply.
Consider first the case in which the monetary authorities
suddenly decide to increase the money supply by an open-
market operation. It is also assumed that in subsequent
periods the authorities revert to the usual level of
money supply and to a policy of balancing the budget, so
that no further additions to the money supply take place.
Under an open market policy, the central bank increases
the money supply by buying bonds at the going market
price from private individuals, and hence leaves the
private nominal wealth unaffected, so that
dM + dA = 0
60
dA _ -r* dM
IT - -p- T
-dM . M r*
" TT P X
Using Equation 5, we obtain
dA _ -dM f e .
T ~ -W
and hence,
diut - da^ =
The effect of an unanticipated transitory open market

purchase of bonds on the equilibrium exchange rate is
obtained by totally differentiating Equation 16 and setting
dy^ = dp*^ = dr*^ = 0 and dm^ - da^ = dm^(^^) and also
dm^+j = dy^+j = dr*^^^ = dp*^+j = 0 and da^+j = 0 for
j =1, 2 i.e., since it is known to be transitory,
we can assume the accumulation behavior does not change.
Hence,
dSt TU
cno " XrFxTTireT
61
At the initial value of and P^, domestic asset

holders find themselves with an excess supply of money
and excess demand for bonds. At a point in time, the
stock of A is given and hence balance of trade flows
cannot affect A. As they attempt to buy foreign assets
they drive up the exchange rate. Hence, the initial
effect of the increase in the money stock is a depreciation
in the exchange rate, to maintain asset market equilibrium.
The increase in the price level due to exchange rate deprecia
tion reduces real wealth. If agents expect the open market
operation to be purely transitory, its change will not
affect real expenditures and wealth accumulation by the
private sector. They will then anticipate the exchange
rate to appreciate in the period after the disturbance.
This lowers the interest rate, and hence leads to an
increase in real balance demand and a decrease in the
demand for real bonds to establish equilibrium. The
depreciation in the exchange rate on impact depends on
the initial proportions of assets in portfolios, 8, and the
elasticity of demand for money with respect to the interest
rate X. The larger the a, and the smaller the e, the
smaller the impact on the exchange rate. After the
corrective monetary policy, the system will return to the
original equilibrium. This is shown graphically below.
t t+1 time
Figure 1. The time path of the exchange rate when a

transitory change in the money supply is
unanticipated
63
The effect of unanticipated transitory monetary

expansion by means of injection of new money into the
system produces similar results, the exchange rate
depreciates. As the public's holdings of money increase,
they attempt to rebalance portfolios by buying foreign
assets. With given supplies of this asset, the increased
demand causes the exchange rate to depreciate. The effects
of injection of new money is derived by totally dif
ferentiating Equation 16 and setting dy^^j = dr*^_|_j =
dp*^_^j = 0 for j = 0, 1, 2 ... and also da^_^j = 0, meaning
that the monetary expansion is known to be transitory, and
we can assume the accumulation behavior does not change.
Hence
dst TU ^
dm^ KE ^ ^
Since < 1, unanticipated monetary expansion causes

the current exchange rate to depreciate, but less than
in proportion to the increase in the money stock. In
contrast to the open market operation, the issue of
new money which is not accompanied by an equivalent
removal of financial assets from the private sector,
does increase the net asset holdings of the private
sector. Thus, the issue of new money has a wealth
64
effect while the open market operation has no such

effect. After the initial adjustment, the stock of
real balances increases. To the extent that agents
expect the monetary expansion to be purely transitory
implies that expenditures and real wealth decumulation
is unlikely to be affected by the short run disturbances.
Agents also expect the exchange rate to be revalued,
and this tends to make the short run rate behave similarly,
thereby providing an offsetting effect.
In the above analysis, the endogenous wealth changes
and its long run implications were ignored. To take these
into consideration we need to examine the analysis under
full rational expectations, where endogenous changes in
foreign assets are considered. However, the unanticipated
transitory monetary expansion could be ignored under full
rational expectations, since presumably a transitory
effect would be ignored by agents.
The magnitudes of the short run adjustments in the
exchange rate for the two forms of monetary expansion
are different and are interesting to compare. We can
deduce that in either case, exchange rate depreciation
occurs, but the extent of depreciation will be greater
for the open market operation than for the case when
new money is issued. An explanation runs as follows.
Open market purchases can be regarded as the difference
65
between monetary expansion and debt expansion, with the

changes in government expenditures cancelling out. Hence,
the effects of an open market operation must be qualita
tively the same as that of monetary expansion, but
reinforced by the additional effect of debt retirement.
Hence, we obtain a stronger decline in asset yields
under open market operation.
Unanticipated permanent monetary disturbance

Permanent unanticipated monetary disturbance is an
increase in the money supply in one period that is not
retracted in subsequent periods. The effects of the two
forms of the monetary expansion in the steady state are
as described in an earlier section. There is full neutrality
in the steady state.
Under partial rational expectations, when A is
treated as exogenous, the effect of an unanticipated
monetary expansion by means of injection of new money
into the system is derived by totally differentiating
Equation 16 and setting dy^_^j = dp*^^^ = dr*^^. = da^_|_j = 0
for j = 0, 1, 2.... Hence
" ITT- ^
66
Therefore
ds^ PU
me
An unanticipated permanent increase in the stock of money

supply causes the exchange rate to depreciate proportionally
and immediately. There is therefore, no accompanying process
of accumulation. Long run neutrality result holds in
this case, since there are no other nominal assets in
this model; is a real asset, not a nominal asset.
Changes in the nominal money supplies have no long run
effects on real variables, such as consumption and trade
balances, but rather an equiproportionate long run
effects on exchange rates and price levels. This is the
same result obtained in the steady state analysis in an
earlier section.
Under full rational expectations, when A is recognized
as endogenous, the effect of a monetary expansion is as
derived below. The unanticipated monetary disturbance
does not affect the level of foreign assets at the time
of implementation of the policy; also the current money
supply level jumps up to the new steady state money supply
level, since the disturbance is permanent, hence
dG = dZ = 0 and dZ®. = 0 for i > 0 and dM - dM and dV. = 0
o o j o x
67
for all i. And hence from Equation 26b we have

dPt = = ô
The unanticipated permanent monetary expansion which

moves the current steady state money supply level to its
new steady state level implies that
d^t PU
= 1
dm^ ME
Hence a pure unanticipated monetary expansion which is

expected to persist under full rational expectations also
leads to full neutrality. The effect of the unanticipated
permanent monetary expansion is shown in Figure 2.
Under partial rational expectations, permanent unanticipated
change in M and G (at t = 0) is described by totally
differentiating Equation 16, and setting dy^_^. = dp*^^j =
= 0 for all j and dm^_^j - da^^^ = hence
dst = i^[dm^ - + .1^ - da^+j)(i^)^]
3--'-
dst PU . 1 1
dm^ omo ° Tû'l+ê + ^<Trê)l
68
t time
Fifure 2 . The time nath of the exchange rate when a remanent

change in the money stock is unanticinated
69
This is the impact effect, assuming agents believe

da^^j = da^^^. This result shows that the short run
exchange rate depreciates more than in proportion to
the increase in the money stock. The extent of the
depreciation depends on the initial proportions of
assets in portfolios. The larger is the proportion of
assets held in the form of nominal balances, 0, the greater
is the extent of depreciation. This reflects the fact
that larger shares of domestic currency assets in domestic
portfolios, imply larger changes in the foreign currency
valuations of portfolios following an unanticipated
depreciation of domestic currency. Consequently, larger
excess demands for foreign assets are induced by the
depreciation. This result is similar to that obtained
by Dombusch (1976). In Dombusch's model, the occurrence
of this phenomenon is associated with the regressivity
of expectations, and the differential speeds of adjustment
between the money market and the goods market. The present
analysis shows that it is the wealth effect in the demand
for money function which is the important factor in this
phenomenon, and not the assumption of regressive expecta
tions.
The above analysis has considered the stock of foreign
assets A, as constant over time, that is changes in A are
exogenous. However, for a permanent change in the money
70
supply by open market operation, the balance of trade

flows can affect the stock of A over time and hence,
should be taken into account. Since the exchange rate
depreciates, the value of real money balances falls,
and hence the real wealth declines. From the accumulation
equation
= Y + A - E(Y + A, ^ + 1^)
we observe that the reduction in real wealth leads

to balance of trade surplus and therefore an accumulation
of foreign assets. With the accumulation of foreign assets,
the real wealth level goes up and leads to an increase
in the demand for real balances, and hence an exchange
rate appreciation. The above analysis can be modified
to incorporate endogenous wealth changes, by examining
Equations 26a and 26b. A permanent unanticipated change
in M and G (at t = 0) means dG^ = dZ^; dM = dM and
o o o
dv
'o = dm^,
O dZ®.J = 0 for j
J > 0;> and dV.
]_ = 0 for all i
hence
dat = -6\dZ^
and
dPt - dm^ + - J
71
Since dZ^ = (T^)dm^, we have
PU
= ^ ® lî+x )r - (iZe)
omo
Hence, unanticipated open market operation under full rational

expectations causes the exchange rate to depreciate more
than in proportion to the increase in the money stock, when
r > 1, and when r < - 1, it oscillates. The magnitude of
the short run adjustments in the exchange rate for open market
operation under partial and full rational expectations are
different and interesting to compare. Under partial rational
expectations, when is treated as exogenous, the effect of
the open market operation is
^ô
a —
omo A exog.
ITe - ^+A
and under full rational expectations, we have
dP
a;;;;; ^ ^-
°1 + Ki+x)r -- Jt-rêrl
and since 0 < (l+x)r - X < 1, conclude that

72
3omo FEE ®o A Exog
That is, even though there is overshooting in each case,

there is less overshooting under full rational expectations.
This reflects the fact that following an unanticipated
depreciation, real wealth declines, and hence a reduction
in real expenditures. Consequently, the trade surplus
induced by the depreciation and the accompanying foreign
asset accumulation provides an offsetting anticipation of
exchange rate appreciation under full rational expectations,
The change in a^, the level of foreign assets is
described by
da. = - 0^,dz^
t 1 o
if r > 1, then the time path of a^ approaches , the

steady state level, from below. Otherwise if r < -1,
a^ converges towards the steady state level in an
oscillatory manner. The time paths are described in
Figure 3 below. This result shows that after the monetary
policy, foreign assets are accumulated. This continues
with A rising until the current account is back in balance.
At that point the rate of accumulation of the foreign assets
73
r<-1
r>1
time
Figure 3. The tine path of a. due to a permanent open market

operation policv
74
is back to zero, so that the system is back in steady state

equilibrium.
The change in the price level p^ due to a policy at
t = 0 is described by
dPt =
When the marginal propensity to consume out of wealth, g, is
small then = (l+A)bo-g>0 and hence r>l, and 0<s<l. Under
that condition, the price level approaches its steady state
value p* geometrically from above. And when the marginal
propensity to consume out of wealth, g, is large then
OQ = (l+A)bo-g<0 and hence r<-l, and 0<s<l. Under that condi
tion the price level approaches its steady state value in an
oscillatory fashion. This is described in Figure 4.
The unanticipated discrete monetary expansion causes an
immediate exchange rate depreciation. The magnitude of this
depreciation is that necessary to establish short run equili
brium. Thereafter, in the absence of additional monetary dis
turbances , the system will converge towards the new steady
state. As the foreign assets are accumulated (due to the fact
that real wealth has fallen), the trade surplus decreases due
to rising wealth. This continues with A rising until the
current account is back in balance. At that point the rate of
accumulation of net foreign assets is back to zero, so that
the system is back in steady state equilibrium. Throughout
the adjustment process there is a surplus in the current
75
Full rational expectation, when r>1
Partial rational expectation
Full rational expectation, when r<-1
Figure 4. The time path of due to a permanent open market

operation policy
76
account. The process continues until the initial real

equilibrium is reattained. At that point the exchange rate
will have depreciated since the nominal money supply is
higher while all real variables are unchanged. The cumula
tive effect of the monetary expansion is thus clearly an
equiproportionate depreciation, but only across steady states.
Figure 5 below shows the time path of the eschange rate under
various expectations assumptions. At time t = 0 when the
monetary policy takes place the spot rate depreciates by the
magnitude partial rational expectations. This is
represented by AB. If we neglect subsequent wealth changes,
that is, if A is exogenous and unchanging, then the exchange
rate stays at that level and follows the path BC. However, if
agents treat A as exogenous, that is E]A^^^] = A^ but the
actual A changes according to Equation 7, then the exchange
rate appreciates and follows the path BE, and approaches the
new steady state value. Under full rational expectations,
the initial impact is the depreciation represented by AD,
and thereafter as foreign assets are accumulated, the
exchange rate appreciates and converges towards its new
steady state equilibrium. The exchange rate appreciates
geometrically at the rate if r > 1, and in an oscillatory
fashion if r < -1.
We also realize that the extent of depreciation
will be greater for an open market operation than for the
77
A< •
t=0 time
Figure 5. The tine path of the exchange rate when a permanent

change in the money stock by means of open market
operation is unanticipated
78
case when new money is issued, the explanation being

that the open market operation is reinforced by the
additional effect of the debt retirement. Hence we obtain
a stronger decline in asset yields under open market
operation.
Comparing the results under permanent disturbance to
the case when the monetary disturbance is transitory,
we realize that the extent of depreciation in the case
of permanent disturbance is greater. This is because
a change in the money supply which is supposed to persist
affects the current and all future money supplies, and
hence must have a greater impact on the exchange rate
than a transitory change which affects only the current
money supply.
Anticipated disturbances
Assume that the initial position of the economy just
before the policy change is a steady state equilibrium,
and the government is initially inactive, that is all
parameters of government policy are set at zero. Therefore
if the change in the money stock at period t + T is
entirely unanticipated, and that up to that time the
money stock has been constant, then the economy will be
in steady state equilibrium up to that time, and when
the monetary expansion occurs, the exchange rate
79
depreciation occurs. In contrast, suppose we are

examining an increase in the nominal money supply at time
t + T in the future and suppose that this increase in
the money supply is announced at time t, in an economy
that is initially in steady state equilibrium. If
portfolio holders anticipate that on the day the money
supply increases the price level and the exchange rate
would jump up, this expectation will immediately drive
portfolio holders out of money and into securities. Hence,
the impact effect of the announcement is to generate a
jump in the price level and exchange rate depreciation.
From then on, the exchange rate will continue to depreciate.
These results operate through the effects of the anticipated
change in the money stock on absorption. The anticipated
increase in the money stock causes an anticipated and
therefore, actual depreciation of the currency. The
anticipation of depreciation lowers the real balances
and hence, real wealth, and spending. From Equation 7,
this gives rise to a current account surplus. The
process continues up to the time the money supply increases,
with all the jumps in the exchange rate and the price
level having been anticipated initially. The current
account surplus leads to accumulation of foreign assets,
and leads to an increase in real wealth which raises
demand for real balances which implies a moderation
80
of the price rise and the exchange rate depreciation.

This offsetting effect of the current account surplus
on the exchange rate depreciation will mean a smaller
total increase in the exchange rate by the time t + T as
compared to the effect of the monetary expansion, under
partial rational expectations, when agents treat A as
exogenous and constant. After the money stock is actually
increased, real wealth increases; this now leads to a
deficit and decumulation of foreign assets until the
Initial real equilibrium is reattained. Throughout the
adjustment process the exchange rate is depreciating
(this will be discussed in detail later on). At time
t + T the exchange rate cannot be expected to jump,
but nominal money does increase; hence, from then on agents
would expect a decline in the exchange rate depreciation,
which means a moderation in the rate of increase in the
exchange rate. In order to increase demand for the
larger stock of money, the rate of interest must fall,
and this occurs due to the expected appreciation of the
exchange rate, after time t + T. From then on, depreciation
continually decreases until it reaches zero in the steady
state. However, if agents treat A as exogenous and
constant, then there will not be any offsetting effect
of the current account surplus on the exchange rate
depreciation.
81
Anticipated permanent monetary disturbance

Under partial rational expectations, a permanent
anticipated open market operation at t = t; that is at
t = 0, agents believe there will be a permanent change at
t = T. It follows from Equation 18 that
dm_ - da = 0 , t + i< T
o o
= dm(Y^) , t + i^T
From Equation 18, we have
dPt • iTx
For t < T, we have
dm^_j.^ - da^^.^ f 0 when t + i ^ x

or for i > T - t
Therefore the time path of the exchange rate due to a

change in expectations at t = 0 is given by
1—T-t
Therefore at t = 0, the impact effect of the change in

expectations is given by dS^ = (Y^)
82
Hence, the impact effect of the announcement is to

generate a depreciation of exchange rate. The results
suggest that the longer the time lag between the time
of the announcement and the time the change actually occurs,
the smaller is the initial depreciation of the exchange
rate. From Equation 29 above, it is clear that the effects
of the anticipated increase in the money stock on the
exchange rate are greatest in the period in which the
change occurs and are proportional to that change in
earlier periods, with the weights declining geometrically.
It is plausible to have the increase in the exchange rate
level in all earlier periods since the information on which
individual's expectations are based changes with the
announcement of the monetary policy. At t = T ,
d(m^î - a^^^) f 0 for all i, hence
Jo
The result shows that the exchange rate depreciates

proportionately more than the increase in the money supply,
at t = T. If agents treat A as exogenous and fixed,
then the exchange rate level stays at the level it
realizes at t = t, that is above the full neutrality
83
level. However, if agents treat A as exogenous, that

is but the actual A^ changes according to
Equation 7, then the exchange rate appreciates at t ^ T
and approaches the full neutrality level as t This

is illustrated in Figure 6.
Comparing the impact effect of unanticipated open
market operation with anticipated open market operation
impact effect, we realize that
= ( X y
3—
omo anticipated I+T' omo
unanticipated
and hence the impact effect of the unanticipated open

market operation is a multiple of the impact effect of the
anticipated open market operation. And since
< 1 it implies that for T > 0
dS. dSo
> J ''
omo unanticipated omo anticipated
Under full rational expectations, a permanent

anticipated open market operation at t = t means that
84
fft
dm^
1 B C
1-e
1.0
Full
Neutrality
1
t=7 time
Figure 6. The time path of the exchange rate under partial

rational expectations when a permanent open market
operation is anticipated
85
dZ = 0
o
dm^ = dm*, t ^ x
= 0 , t < T
which implies that
dv^ = -dm*, i < T

= 0 , i^T
and also
dZ^ = 0 , i f T
dz^ = dz = dm
Consider first the path of the economy at t . Hence,

from equation 26a we have
daT= E ((}>-!+
X ^_Q J. <j)2S^)]dm
z. - dz[-^
r + -^(^)^]
s r
= 9^1J-[ z (6nr^
J. + 6)S^)dm
•^ - J + 4/s'^"^)dz]
4
- *5*2^
86
where
T-1
5 =[ - (*3?^" + *48^" )dz]
If > 0, and < 0, then a^ will be above its steady

state level and consequently lead to dectanulation of external
assets when t > x. If (j)^ < 0 and Y5 > 0, then a^ will be
below its steady state level and consequently lead to
accumulation of external assets when t > t.^
For t > T, the change in a^ is given by
da^ = e^^dmE^z^C^^r^ + *28^)] - eîdzf^gr^"^ + <j)^s'^"^]
and as t 00, .> 0 and therefore da^ -• 0. This

means that after the monetary policy is implemented,
the system will converge towards its steady state value,
either from above or from below, depending on the signs
of ({>^ and The process continues until the initial
^See Appendix 4 for explanations.

87
real equilibrium is reattained. The time path of the

external assets level towards equilibrium in the long
run will be oscillatory for the case when r < -1.
The time path of a^ for t < T is as follows:
(i) when t = 0, da^ = 0
(ii) when 0 < t < t,
da = 6^-,[ E (Onr^ + *^s^)]dm - [ z (|)«s^(l-(^)^)]dm

^ i=0 ^ i=0 ^ ^
+ [*4sT-t-l(l - (|)^)]dZ
t i i i t tN
= e [ Z (*nr + (j)~s )- z *nS (r -s )]dm
^ i=0 ^ i=0
+ [+4sT-t-l(l - (|)^)]dz
An expected monetary expansion at t = -r would cause an

immediate depreciation in the domestic currency and hence,
a decline in real balances, real wealth, and real expendi
tures. This would consequently lead to current account
surplus. Hence, we would expect an accumulation of
foreign assets. This is reinforced by the last term, the
expected seizure of external assets by the government
from the private individuals, hence we can conclude that
da^ > 0. This means that at t = 0 when expectations are
revised due to an anticipated change in the monetary
88
policy, there is no immediate impact on the level of

external assets that is a^ remains unchanged. But when
the anticipated depreciation leads to actual depreciation,
•we achieve a current account surplus and hence an accumula
tion of foreign assets. As t approaches T, we accumulate
more and more foreign assets. This process continues
until the monetary policy is carried out at t = %. The
time path of the foreign asset level in relation to the
time path of the exchange rate will be fully discussed
later on in this section.
Let us now consider the time path of the price level.
From Equation 26b, the time path of the price level due to
the announcement at t = 0 is described below:
(i) When t = ?
r8n^ 1 1 T -1 - •
dp^ = dm + [ + *48^" )dZ-dm z^((|,^r +^2^ )]
= ^ + (l+x)r - X
If (j>5 < 0, it implies that > 0. This means that

for levels of external assets below the steady state level
at t = T, the exchange rate is above its steady state level.
Assets are accumulated as a^ moves up towards its steady
state level, at the same time as the exchange rate
appreciates. Since asset accumulation is brought about by
89
a current account surplus, we have a current account surplus

acconçanying an appreciating exchange rate in the adjustment
process. Similarly if (p^ > 0, it implies that < 0, and
hence for levels of external assets above the steady level
at t = T, the exchange rate is below (undershoots) its
steady state level. Hence, in that case assets are de-
cumulated as a^ moves down towards its steady state level,
at the same time as the exchange rate depreciates.
(ii) when t > x
dPt - dm - (i+x)r -
As t 0 and dp^ dm. The exchange rate either

overshoots or undershoots its long run target at t = ?
depending on the signs of <P^ and and at t > it
either appreciates or depreciates towards the steady state
equilibrium, exponentially if r > 1 or oscillatory fashion
if r < -1.
(iii) when t < t - 1
90
re^, t-1 . .
^^t = - ^(l+x>r - *2=
T -t <t)2^(|-)^ I
'iio ^
,S\t
+ [^4 + (l+x)r - x]sT-t-ldz
Hence, when t = 0
T-1 (t>2^ i
dpj - dm - ^î^[y2 + (1+,)^ -
+ t''4 + (l+!)r - )Jst-ldz
= dm - E + j- [r(i+^),>]s^'^dz
Hence, at t = 0, when expectations are revised, a^ is ixn-

changed; the imnediate response is a depreciation of the ex
change rate. The anticipated increase in the money stock
causes an anticipated and therefore an actual depreciation of
the domestic currency. Under perfect foresight the magnitude
of depreciation due to the announcement generates a movement
of the exchange rate in an exponential manner, until the
monetary policy is implemented. During this period, real
balances, wealth and spending are lowered, and consequently
lead to a current account surplus and foreign assets are
91
accumulated. If agents do not form rational expectations,

this implies an appreciating exchange rate whith the agents
persistently ignore. Under full rational expectations, this
is not possible and hence, the initial decline in the stock
of real balances is less, implying that the initial deprecia
tion is also less. When the monetary expansion is antici
pated, the expected inflation that the anticipated monetary
increase induces causes bond stock to rise, through trade
balance surplus, and thus exerts a deflationary effect on the
price level. Hence, the depreciation of the exchange rate by
the time of the policy implementation will be much less than
the effect under partial rational expectations. At t = x
the monetary authorities carry out the open market operations,
a monetary expansion with a contraction in external assets.
If (j)^ > 0, then a^ is above its steady state level and hence
the exchange rate undershoots its steady state target. After
the monetary policy is implemented, assets are decumulated,
at the same time as the exchange rate continues to
depreciate. This process continues until the initial
real equilibrium is reattained. The time paths of the
exchange rate and the foreign assets are described in
Figures 7a and 7b. When the change in the money stock
is anticipated, the impact effect of the announcement
is to generate exchange rate depreciation represented
by AB in Figure 7a. Due to expectations, the exchange
92
dm
Full
Nutrality
t=0 t=T time
Fifture 7a. The time path of the price level (exchange rate)
under full rational expectations when an open
market operation is anticipated
93
t=0 time
Fipure 7b. The time path of the foreign asset level a^,
94
rate continues to depreciate, following the path BC,

accompanied by current account surplus and hence external
assets accumulation (Figure 7b). After the monetary
policy, the exchange rate cannot be expected to depreciate,
but nominal money does increase, accompanied by a contrac
tion in external assets. In order to increase demand for
the larger stock of money, the rate of interest must fall,
and this occurs due to an expected appreciation in the
exchange rate. This expected appreciation, therefore,
means a moderation in the exchange rate depreciation.
Hence at t > T the exchange rate depreciates at a decreasing
rate until it reaches zero in the steady state. Using
the following assumed parameter values, we can simulate
the time path of the price level for illustration:
g = 0.2, b^ = 0.8; T = 5; X = 0.2; 0 = 0.01; m* = 100;
e^ = 2, and e^ = 2. Hence, the calculated values of the
remaining parameters are r = 1.63; s = 0.16; 02 = 0.2;
«2 = -1.36; Oq = 0.76; YQ = 96; Yi = 0.02; y2 = 0.81;
Y2 ~ -1.47; Y^ ~ 0.15; (J)^ = 6; <|i^ = 0.022; <j>2 ~ 0.033;
(j)^ = 1.58; = 0.001; D = 1.11; 6^ = 0.61. Let us also
assume that the money supply is expected to rise from 100
to 200. The calculated exchange rate levels under partial
and full rational expectations are shown in Table la
below.
95
Table la. Calculated exchange rate levels in response

to anticipated open market operations
dS^/dm^ dS^/dm^
Full rational Partial rational
Time expectations expectations
Preannouncement 0.0000 0.0000

t = 0 0.0002 0.00023
1—I
II
0.0012 0.0008
t = 2 0.0025 0.0047
t = 3 0.0170 0.0281
t = 4 0.0280 0.1684
t = 5 0.9762 1.0100
t = 6 0.9854 1.0100
0.9910 1.0100
rt
II
t = 8 0.9945 1.0100
t =9 0.9966 1.0100
t = 10 0.9979 1.0100
t ™ P^ 1.0000
96
The exchange rate undershoots under full rational

expectations and overshoots under partial rational
expectations at t = x. Under full rational expectations,
the exchange rate continues to depreciate at t > t, but
at a decreasing rate and is accompanied by external asset
decumulation until initial real equilibrium is reattained.
Under partial rational expectations when a^ is treated as
exogenous and fixed, the exchange rate does not appreciate
after t = %, rather it stays at that level permanently.
However, if < 0, then a^ is below its steady state
level and hence, the exchange rate overshoots its steady
state target. After the monetary policy is implemented,
assets are accumulated, at the same time as the exchange
rate appreciates. This process continues until the initial
real equilibrium is reattained. The time paths of the
exchange rate and the foreign assets are described in
Figures 8a and 8b. When the change in the money stock
is anticinated, the impact effect of the announcement
is to generate exchange rate depreciation represented
by AB in Figure 8a. Due to expectations, the exchange
rate continues to rise, following the path BC, accompanied
by current account surplus (Figure 8b), and hence foreign
asset accumulation. After the monetary policy, the
exchange rate cannot be expected to depreciate, but
nominal money does increase, hence from then on agents
97
Full
Neutrality
Figure 8a. The time path of the price level (exchange rate)
98
i=û t=T time
FiRure 8b. The time path of the foreign asset level a^,
99
would expect an appreciation in the exchange rate. In

order to increase demand for the larger stock of money,
the rate of interest must fall, and this occurs due to the
expected appreciation in the exchange rate. From then on,
appreciation continually occurs until it reaches zero
in the steady state.
Using the following assumed parameter values we can
simulate the time path of the price level for illustration:
g = 0.2; = 0.8; T = 5; X = 0.2; 0 = 0.5; m* = 100;
e^ = 2; and e^ = 2. Hence, the calculated values of the
remaining paremeters are r = 1.63; s = 0.16; X2 = 0.2;
" -1.36; Oq = 0.76; = 96; = -0.02; yg = 0.81;
Y2 ~ -1.47; Y4 ~ 0.15; (j)^ = 6; = 0.022; ^2 ~ 0.033;
(j)^ = 1.58; (j)^ = 0.001; D = 1.11; 0^ = 0.61. Let us
also assume that the money supply is expected to rise
from 100 to 200. The calculated exchange rate levels
under partial and full rational expectations are shown
in Table lb below.
The exchange rate overshoots under both partial
and full rational expectations. Under full rational
expectations, the exchange rate appreciates after t = t
and is accompanied by external assets accumulation.

Under partial rational expectations when a^ is treated
as exogenous and fixed, the exchange rate does not
appreciate after t = %, rather, it stays at that level
100
Table lb. Calculated exchange rate levels in response

to anticipated open market operations


o
0.0002 0.0003
rt
II
t= 1 0.0018 0.0015
t = 2 0.0063 0.0093
t = 3 0.0410 0.0555
t= 4 0.0515 0.3333
t= 5 1.8670 2.0000
t= 6 1.5320 2.0000
t = 7 1.3263 2.0000
oo
1.2002 2.0000
rt
II
t= 9 1.1228 2.0000
t = 10 1.0753 2.0000
t ^ 1.0000
101
permanently. We can conclude then, that what happens

to the exchange rate under full rational expectations
at t = T (i.e., whether it undershoots or overshoots)
depends critically on the structure of the economic
system. In particular, if 0 (fraction of wealth held
in the form of real balances) is small, the exchange
rate undershoots and if it is large, the exchange rate
overshoots its steady state target at t = %.
The effect of a pure monetary expansion produces
similar results. Under partial rational expectations
a permanent anticipated pure monetary expansion at
t = T means that
dm^ = 0; t+ i < T
= dm; t + i-^ T
From Equation 18, we have
For t £ T, we have
dm^_^j^ 0 when t + i ^ t
or when i ^ t - t
Therefore, the time path of the exchange rate due to a
change in expectations at t = 0 is given by
102
1—T~ t-
Therefore at t = 0, the impact effect of the change in

expectations is given by
dPo = (l^)^dm
The time path of the price level (exchange rate) until

t = T is given by
Hence, the longer the time lag between the time of the
announcement and the time the change actually occurs,
the smaller is the initial depreciation of the exchange
rate. For t < %, the exchange rate depreciates exponentially,
and the system reaches full neutrality at t = %.
Comparing the impact effect of the unanticipated
pure monetary expansion with the anticipated pure
monetary expansion effect, we obtain
dME anticipated dME unanticipated

103
and hence
< as.
a® anticipated dîIE unanticipated
since < 1
We also realize that the extent of depreciation will

be greater for an open market operation than for the
pure monetary expansion case, i.e..
dSo 1 \/ ,X \T 'dS^
_ /_1 o =
Tomo
~ antlctpated" '3® anticipated I+x
the reason being that the open market operation is reinforced

by the additional effect of the debt retirement; hence, we
obtain a stronger decline in asset yields under open
market operation.
The analysis on the pure monetary expansion has
considered the stock of foreign assets exogenous and
constant over time. However, the monetary expansion can
affect the stock of A over time through the balance of
trade flows. In the full rational expectations model, the
analysis is modified to incorporate endogenous wealth
changes. A permanent anticipated pure monetary expansion
means that
dZj = 0 for all j
104
dm^ = dm*, t ^ T
= 0, t < T
which implies that

dV. = -dm*, i < T
= 0, i^T
The time path of a^ for t £ T will be as follows:
(i) for t = 0, dao = 0
(ii) for t < T
t i i T-t: • ^ ^
da_ = 8 1[ Z (Oir + (j)«s ) - z (j)«s (r - s )]dm
^ ^ i=0 ^ i=0
There will be an immediate depreciation of the exchange

rate at the time of the announcement of a future increase
in the money stock. From then on, the exchange rate
will continue to depreciate and the anticipation of
depreciation, by lowering real balances, wealth and
spending will give rise to a current account surplus,
hence, da^ > 0
(iii) t = T
(iv) Finally for t > t,

105
da_ = 8f Z (Onri + (j)«si)dni]

^ •^1=0-^ ^
and as t + », da^ 0 and therefore after the monetary

policy is implemented, the system converges towards its
steady state equilibrium. The effect of the pure
monetary expansion on the time of the price level is
described as follows:
(i) t = 0
T-t * 2 ^ i
= dm - s dm
= dm - : ^[bo-g +
o o
As noted in an earlier discussion, there will be an
immediate depreciation of the exchange rate at the time of
the announcement of the future increase in the money stock.
From then on, the exchange rate will continue to depreciate,
and the anticipation of depreciation will lower real
balances, real wealth and real expenditures and hence will
give rise to current account surplus. The subsequent time
paths of the price level under full rational expectations
is as follows:
(ii) when t < T
106
re^,
i-O 1 t-1 s '
aPt = dm - [(i+^)r - %][.Eo(*ir + *2=
T-t i
" iio (1+A)r - dm
(iii) when t = t
re"^- T-1 . .
dp, = dm - '(l+Or - + *2» )dm]
1—u
Hence no overshooting at t = t.
(iv) Finally when t > t
RE^N T -1 J J
dPt ° dn - )dm]
as t ^ », dp^ dm that is the system approaches full

neutrality in the long run. The time paths of the
price level and the level of external assets are described
in Figures 9 and 10. lên the change in the money stock
is anticipated, the impact effect of the announcement
is to generate an immediate depreciation represented
by AB (Figure 10), when agents form partial rational
expectations. Due to expectations, the exchange rate
continues to rise, following the curve BD. The system
attains full neutrality at t = t under partial rational
107
t=0 t=T time
Figure 9. The time path of the external assets level when

the change in the money stock is anticipated
under full rational expectations
108
dm
Full
Neutrality
t=0 t=T time
Figure 10. The time paths of the exchange rate when the
change in the money stock is anticipated under
full rational and partial rational expectations
109
expectations. Under full rational expectations, the initial

jump is represented by AC. Due to expectations, the
exchange rate continues to depreciate following the
path CE accompanied by current account surplus (refer
to Figure 9) and hence foreign asset accumulation.
After the money stock is actually increased at t = t, real
wealth increases, this now leads to a deficit and decumula
tion of external assets (Figure 9) until the initial
real equilibrium is reattained. Throughout the adjustment
process the exchange rate is depreciating. At t = T,
the exchange rate cannot be expected to jump, but nominal

money does increase, hence from then on agents would
expect a decline in the exchange rate depreciation which
means a moderation in the rate of increase in the exchange
rate. In order to increase the demand for the larger
stock of money, the rate of interest must fall, and this
occurs due to the expected decline in exchange rate
depreciation, after t = T. From then on the exchange rate
depreciation continually decreases until it reaches
zero in the steady state. If agents, however, treat A
as exogenous and constant, then there will not be any
offsetting effect of the current account surplus on the
exchange rate depreciation, and hence the exchange rate
will reach its new steady state at t = x.
110
It is important to note from the above analysis that

purely nominal disturbances have real effects. This is
because the anticipated rise in prices and the exchange
rate, affect portfolio choices and hence wealth, and
the current account. The temporary effects of the
anticipated monetary disturbance will have to be reversed
before the economy reaches its new steady state. Therefore,
the initial current account surplus will then turn to a
deficit. Thus, if the government policy can be anticipated
at all, changes in the supply of money may generate leads
as well as lags in the level of prices and the exchange
rate. This phenomenon can alter the timing of shipments
of tradeable goods and introduce substantial leads and
lags in payments for imports.
Using the same parameter values from the previous
example, we can simulate the time path of exchange rate
under both partial and full rational expectations.
The simulation results in Table 2 show that after
the initial depreciation at t = 0, the exchange rate
continues to depreciate as t approaches x. Under partial
rational expectations, the system attains full neutrality
at t = T. Under full rational expectations, the exchange rate
rate undershoots its long run target at t = t. There is
a moderation in the rate of depreciation of the exchange
after the implementation of the monetary policy. The
Ill
Table 2. Calculated exchange rate levels in response to

anticipated pure monetary expansion
dS^/dm^

t = 0 0.00012 0.00013
t = 1 0.00121 0.00077
t = 2 0.00250 0.00463
t = 3 0.01700 0.02778
t =4 0.02750 0.16667
t = 5 0.96720 1.00000
t = 6 0.97990 1.00000
t = 7 0.98766 1.00000
t = 8 0.99243 1.00000
t = 9 0.99536 1.00000
t = 10 0.99715 1.00000
t; -»• oo P^ 1.00000
112
exchange rate depreciation continually decreases until

it reaches zero in the steady state.
The results in Tables 1 and 2 show that the initial
depreciation in the exchange rate under full rational
expectations is less than the depreciation in the exchange
rate under partial rational expectations. This is
because under full rational expectations there is an
offsetting wealth effect on the exchange rate depreciation.
The results also show that the extent of depreciation
is greater for an open market operation than for the
pure monetary expansion; the reason being that the open
market operation is reinforced by the additional effect
of the debt retirement.
For convenience, the results derived in the previous
sections are tabulated in Table 3 for comparison. Table
3 shows that at t = 0, the impact effect of an announcement
of monetary expansion is smaller than the impact effect of
an unanticipated monetary expansion. This hypothesis
will be tested in Chapter 4. In order to carry out this
test, anticipated and unanticipated money supplies must
be quantified. This involves forecasting the money
supply process and separating out expected and unexpected
components. The money supply forecast in this study will
be carried out by performing time series analysis on the
monthly money supplies.
113
Table 3. Comparison of the effects of anticipated and

unanticipated permanent monetary expansion
t = 0 0 < t < T t = T t > T
> 1.0 approaching approaching approaching

omo unantic.
do = 1.0 = 1.0 = 1.0 = 1.0

3ÎŒ unantic.
r
omo antic. < 1 increasing < 1 if *5 > 0 approaching
> 1 if (j)5 < 0 1.0
cÊ antic. < 1 increasing < 1 approaching

1.Ô
Anticipated transitory monetary disturbance

From Equation 16 it can be shown that the effects
of the transitory open market operation and the pure
monetary expansion on the spot exchange rate, under
partial rational expectations, are a multiple of the
effects of the unanticipated transitory monetary disturbances.
Hence we have
114
(i) dS, TA dS. TU

omo omo
(ii) dSt TA dS^ TU

dME
The results suggest that the larger the time lag between
the time of the announcement and the time the change
actually occurs, the smaller is the initial depreciation
in the current exchange rate. The effects of the anticipated
increase in the money stock on the exchange rate are
greatest in the period in which the change occurs and are
proportional to that change in earlier periods with the
weights declining geometrically. Afterwards, when there
is a corrective monetary policy, the system will return
to the original equilibrium.
Endogenous wealth changes and its long run implications
were ignored in the above analysis. To take these into
consideration we need to examine the analysis under full
rational expectations. However, the anticipated transitory
monetary expansion could be ignored under full rational
expectations, since presumably a transitory effect would
be ignored by agents.
115
General Features of the

Two Country Model
So far the theory has focused on one country facing
a world market. The objective of this section is to
formulate an operational theory of determination of one
bilateral rate between two countries. The pumose is to
obtain a model for the empirical analysis in Chapter 4.
We assume there are two countries, A and B. Each country
is fully employed, prices in each country are flexible.
Each country produces a single identical tradeable good,
and the output is given in each country. We also assume
the competitive arbitrage assumption about prices that
P = SP* (30)
where P, S, P* are as defined before. Equilibrium in
the world goods market requires that world real expenditures
equal world real income. The implication of the assumption
of only a single good is the simultaneous goods market
equilibrium and the total real income and total real
expenditures balance, hence
E + E* = Y + Y* (31)
where
E = E(Y, W) (32)
E* = E*(Y*,W*) (33)
116
E (E*) is the domestic (foreign) real expenditures. These

depend on real income and real wealth. It is assumed
that there are only four types of assets: domestic
currency, foreign currency, domestic index bonds each
yielding one unit of domestic outout per unit of time,
and foreign index bonds each yielding one unit of foreign
output per unit of time. Let us assume that domestic
bonds are perfect substitutes for the foreign bonds in
the portfolio of individual wealth holders. Let us also
assume that they are issued by the domestic government.
At each point in time, wealth holders in each coimtry
allocate their stock of wealth between bonds and domestic
money, hence
M , A (34)
(35)
where A (A*) is the domestic (foreign) ownership of the

real asset; r* is the endogenously determined world real
interest rate; and W (W*), M (M*) and P (P*) are as
defined before.
Due to perfect capital mobility, we have
r* + P/P
r* + P*/P*
117
hence
where r^^ (r^^) is the country A (B) nominal interest

rate. It is assumed that in each country the fraction
of real wealth which residents wish to hold in real
balances depends on the alternative cost of holding -money
and real income, so that
^ = 0(r* + TT, Y)W (36)
^= 8*(r* + TT^'S Y*)W* (37)
where -n = P/P and = p*/p*. It is also assumed that the

fraction of real wealth which residents in each country
wish to hold in bonds depends on the interest rate and
on real income. The wealth constraint requires that the
sum of their real demands for all assets must be equal to
their stock of wealth. Also, the sum of the partial
effects on the two asset demands of a change in either
the interest rate or real income must be zero. Thus,
only one of the two asset demand functions is independent
in each country. That is, since the asset demand functions
are dependent on wealth, and because of the wealth constraint,
and also given perfect substitutability between bonds,
118
only one of the asset demand functions is independent.

Therefore, equilibrium in the assets markets will be
described by specifying equilibrium in the money markets
only. Substituting Equation 34 into 36 and 35 into 37
we obtain the following two equations:
M _
F"
• L(r* + IT, Y) < 0, L2 > 0 (38)
and
M* _ re*(r* + IT*, Y*)

- 11 _ 8*(r* + IT*,
= .L*(r* + ?*, Y*) L*3_ < 0, L*2 > 0 (39)
The complete model of the system then is
p - ^ L(r* + IT, Y) (40)
^ ^ • L*(r* + 17*, Y*) (41)
E + E* = Y + Y* (42)
119
At any point in time, M, M*, Y, Y*, A, A* and the

expectational variable are predetermined, and the
three equations determine the short run variables P,
P* and r*. Having solved for P and P* we can then
determine the exchange rate, using the purchasing power
parity condition.
The Exchange Rate Equation

Using Equations 40 and 41 we can obtain
M _ PA.L(r* + Y)
p*A*.L*(r* 4- TT*, Y*)
Assuming the demand for money in both countries is of the

conventional type. Equation 43 can be specified as
Assuming that the domestic and foreign parameters are the

same, that is assuming symmetry, y = y* and \ = x* we
shall have
^ ~ S(^)(^) e (45)
where x is the expected rate of change of the exchange

rate. Taking logs on both sides yields
120
S = (m - m*) + (a* - a) + y(y* - y) + Ax (46)
VThere x is a proxy for the forward premium, that is

x^ = ^^t+1 " ^t^ where (S^) is the logarithm of
the forward (spot) exchange rate and denotes the
expectations operator. From Equation 46 the bilateral
exchange rate depends on the foreign and domestic money
supplies, stock of assets owned by both the domestic
and foreign residents, outputs in both countries and the
expected rate of change of the exchange rate. For a
given stock of real assets and outputs in each country,
the rate at which the exchange rate depreciates is equal
to the difference in the rates of change in nominal money
supplies. Also, when the domestic real income grows
faster than the foreign real income, the domestic currency
will appreciate. Growth in real income stimulates the
demand for money, and with given nominal stock of money,
this requires a fall in the price level and hence,
exchange rate appreciation. Similarly, an increase in
the accumulation of bonds in the domestic country, for
example through current account surplus raises real
wealth and consequently leads to exchange rate appreciation.
And finally, an expected exchange rate depreciation reduces
the demand for real money, the price level therefore rises
and the exchange rate depreciates to maintain purchasing
121
power parity. The anticipation of depreciation therefore

induces an actual depreciation.
Following the same procedure as in Section 1, we
can derive the rational expectations solution for the
exchange rate, and obtain
St = TTT
The current exchange rate then depends not only on the

domestic current and expected future monetary and real
variables, but also on the foreign current and future
behavior of these variables. Again we can examine the
effects of unanticipated and anticipated monetary policies
on the exchange rate. The end results will be qualitatively
the same as found in Section 1. But the adjustment mechanism
in this case will be different. In the small country
case, the interest rate remains unchanged and the
expected rate of exchange depreciation serves as the
equilibrating mechanism. In this general equilibrium
model, the world interest rate does not remain unchanged.
The interest rate responds to both domestic and foreign
monetary policies, and hence affects their saving activities,
and hence the price levels and the exchange rate.
122
The results arrived at in this chapter will be

tested in the following chapter. Data from the U.S.,
Germany and Netherlands will be used.
123
CHAPTER 4. EMPIRICAL ESTIMATION
The objective of the first part of this chapter

is to examine the empirical validity of the simple asset
market model of exchange rate determination in Equation 47.
As has been pointed out, the model is based on an assumption
concerning the interrelationships between domestic and
foreign prices, through the condition of purchasing power
parity, and by manipulating money market equilibrium
conditions. Studies by Bilson (1978), Clements and
Frenkel (1980) and Branson, Halttunnen and Masson (1977)
follow this approach.
Bilson (1978) tested his model using monthly data
for the Federal Republic of Germany and the United
Kingdom over a period from April 1970 to May 1977.
In order to incorporate some form of distributed lag
•mechanism to take account of the slow adjustment of the
actual exchange rate to the equilibrium exchange rate
level, he assumed that the actual exchange rate adjusts
toward the equilibrium rate according to the equation
Ln(S) - Ln(S_^) = Y[Ln(S) - Ln(S_^)] where y denotes
the partial adjustment coefficient and"'^ denotes the
equilibrium exchange rate, that is defined as
124
He also allows for a trend in the shift factor, as

specified below.
Ln(K/K*) = + K^t
where is a constant and is the rate of growth in

the relative money demand. Hence, the exchange rate
equation becomes
Ln(S) = Bq + B^LnCM) + 62^11(M*) + g^Ci-i*) + e^Ln(Y)
4-g^Ln(Y*) + Bgt + ByLn(S_i) + V (47)
where
Bq ~ •*•^0' ®1 ~ ^2 ~ ^3 ~ YE; ~ -yn;

65 = yn; 6g = yK^; By = 1 - y-
He estimated Equation 47 in two ways; first he estimated

the equation as it is without any restrictions on the
corefficients and secondly imposed stochastic prior
restrictions on the coefficients. For convenience, the
results he obtained are as stated in Tables 4 and 5.
Observation of the unrestricted model leads to the
condition that the data do not support the monetary
model of exchange rate determination based upon the
fact that none of the coefficients of the money supply
Table 4. OLS estimates for Ln(S) Dm/ unrestricted
gq Ln(M^) Ln(M*^) (i-i*) Ln(Y^) Ln(Y*^) t Ln(S-l)
Ln(S) -1.15 0.46 0.04 0.34 -0.03 -0.18 -0.01 0.71

(0.765) (1.446) (0.457) (2.670) (0.218) (1.099) (2.321) (9.27)
SE = 0.0258 = 0.9832 p = 0.2087 DW = 1.954
Table 5. OLS estimates for Ln(S) DM/ restricted-mixed sample and prior informa-
tien
gg Ln(M^) Ln(M*^) (i-i*) Ln(Y^) Ln(Y*^) t Ln(S-l)
Ln(S) -0.25 0.19 -0.18 0.26 -0.17 0.19 -0.001 0.81

(0.901) (5.072) (5.172) (2.741) (3.135) (3.362) (3.055) (23.20)
SE = 0.0276 = 0.9807 P = 0.2496 DH = 1.9707
126
or real income variables are statistically significant.

The problem, according to Bilson, may be that many of the
variables on the right hand side of the equation are highly
collinear, so that the sample information cannot distinguish
their influence on the exchange rate. He then imposed
the prior information consistent with the monetary
theory on the model and obtained the results shown in
Table 5, The results as shown are consistent with the
predictions of the monetary theory. The consistency
of the equation with the predictions of the monetary
approach is best seen by deriving the associated expression
for the equilibrium exchange rate. The equilibrium rate
is derived by setting equal to Doing this
he obtained the results shown below in Table 6.
Clements and Frenkel (1980) have applied the monetary
approach to the exchange rate determination to the analysis
of the monthly dollar/pound exchange rate over the period
February 1921 to May 1925, during which time exchange
rates were flexible. Special attention was given to
the relationship between the exchange rate and the
relative price of traded and nontraded goods. Since there
are no available data for the prices of traded and
nontraded goods, they proxied the prices of traded goods
by the wholesale price indices and the prices of nontraded
goods by wages. In general, the empirical results they
Table 6. OLS estimates for Ln(S) DM/ restricted-mixed sample and prior informa
tion
Po Ln(M^) Ln(M'V^) (i-i*) Ln(Y^) Ln(Y>^^.) t
Ln(S) -1.328 1.003 -0.985 1.385 -0.901 1.018 -0.005

(6.259) (6.258) (2.792) (3.341) (3.623) (3.247)
Table 7. OLS estimates for Ln(S) $/
ô ^'T'^ N Ln(M) Ln(M*) Ln(Y/Y*) (i-i*)
Ln(S) -4.297 0.415 1.050 -0.044 0.188 0.363

(1.396 (0.099) (0.1821) (0.143) (0.066) (0.350)
= 0.96 SIÎ = 0.015 DW = 1.55 P « 0.88
128
obtained were reasonably satisfactory, in relation to

the predictions of the theoretical model. Results are
shown in Table 7.
The figures in parentheses are the standard errors
of the estimated coefficients. The coefficient of relative
prices turned out with the predicted sign and highly
significant. The elasticity of the exchange rate with
respect to the domestic money supply is consistent
with the homogeneity postulate, that a given change in
the supply of money results in an equiproportionate
change in the exchange rate. However, the elasticity
with respect to the foreign money supply does not differ
significantly from zero, meaning that the set of data
rejects the restriction of equality between domestic
and foreign elasticities. They attributed the inadequate
fitting of the data to the model to the following reasons:
(a) differences in definitions of the U.S. and U.K. money
supplies used in the monthly series. (b) U.K. monetary
series have varied much less than that of the U.S.
The estimated elasticity of the exchange rate with
respect to the income ratio turned out to be positive
and significant. The positive sign is in contrast
with the prediction of the monetary model. Finally,
the coefficient on the interest rate differential had
the positive sign predicted by the model, but the
129
parameter estimate did not differ significantly from

zero.
Branson, Halttunnen and Masson (1977) have applied
the asset market model empirically to the dollar/deutsche mark
exchange rate. They examined a bilateral model for the
$/DM rate as a function of measures of the U.S. and West
German stocks of money and net foreign assets. They also
extended the theory to include government reaction
functions for both monetary policy and exchange market
intervention. They argue that government actions, by
altering the stocks of assets held by the private sector,
will necessarily, affect the exchange rate. They argue
further that accounting for policy actions merely through
the addition of exogenous variables to the model is not
enough, rather the model must incorporate additional
equations explaining the systematic part of the authorities
behavior. They included policy reaction functions for
international reserves of Germany and for domestic
component of the German Central bank money stock. Their
estimation results are presented in Table 8, where S =
spot exchange rate; Ml = money stock in domestic currencies;
FP = private foreign assets stocks in dollars. Figures
in parentheses are the t - statistics.
The first equation shows the ordinary least squares
estimates, and the second shows the Cochrane-Orcutt
130
Table 8. OLS estimates for S ($/DM)
Mlg Mlu FPg FPu RHO R2 m
S -9.43 -0.103 0.143 0.249 -0.289 0.826 0.41

(-6.0) (-6.1) (10.5) (1.1) (1.8)
S -8.8 -0.057 0.089 0.456 -0.293 0.864 0.938 1.33

(-0.2) (-1.6) (2.8) (1.3) (-1.6) (13.7)
estimates, correcting for serial correlation in the error

terms. All the coefficients in the first equation have
the predicted signs and t-statistics for the Mis are
fairly high; but the residuals are highly correlated.
The Cochrane-Orcutt equation shows a KHO value of 0.866
with only the U.S. money stock Mlu remaining significant
at the 5 per cent level. The coefficients still have the
expected signs but the Ml coefficients are cut by half.
The coefficient for FPu is fairly stable but that for
FPg increases by a factor of nearly two. The residuals
in the equation with Cochrane-Orcutt transformation
still exhibits some autocorrelation.
In Table 9 below, we have consistent estimates of
reaction functions estimated jointly with the exchange
Table 9. Consistent estimates for reaction functions and exchange rates (25LS)
Central bank money and Ml (in DM)
Bo e($/DM) RHO R2 DW
(la) MBg -0.736 1.074 80.140 0.994 0.87
(4.6) (72.9) (1.3)
(lb) MBg -0.785 1.080 -67.053 0.731 0.997 1.508
(-1.8) (26.8) (-1.5) (6.3)
(Ic) Mlg 0.959 1.372 -67.944 0.917 0.989 1.719
(0.2) (3.5) (-0.6) (13.6)
Foreign exchange reserves (in $)
Go FGg-1 e($/DM RHO .R2 DW
(2) FGg 11944 0.631 188.673 0.338 0.780 1.629

(2.8) (4.7) (2.8) (2.1)
Exchange rate
"ô Mlg Mlu FPg Fpu RHO R^ DW
(3) S 151.58 -0.02 0.0145 0.338 -0.247 0.814 0.771 1.118

(1.5) (-0.4) (0.3) (0.7) (-0.8) (8.4)
^T-Jhere MB and HB are central bank money and target central bank money,
respectively.
132
rate equation. Two stage least squares were used on

the three-equation system.
In the estimated Equations la and lb of Table 9
for German base money, the realized value of the base
is very closely related to the target, but it is weakly
related to the exchange rate change with a positive
coefficient. When the equation is estimated with the
Cochrane-Orcutt transformation the coefficient for the
exchange rate change takes on a negative sign, which is
also insignificant. Equation (Ic) has Ml as the dependent
variable, and there is no effect running from the exchange
rate to money. These results support the findings of
other studies that the Bundesbank has generally been
able to pursue its control of the money supply very closely
without interference from the exchange rate vis-à-vis
the dollar.
In the estimated reaction function for interventions
(Equation 2 in Table 9), the foreign exchange reserve
stock is positively and significantly related to the
change in the exchange rate, indicating an attempt to
smooth fluctuations.
Many other researchers have applied the monetary
approach to exchange rate determination to other data
sets from several other countries. Results are mixed
in nature. But a general conclusion that can be drawn
133
from the existing empirical literature is that the

monetary model explains a very high percentage of the
variation in the exchange rate, however these results
do not support the consideration of the monetary model
as a complete description of the exchange rate. This
may be due to several factors. For example, the implica
tions of the policy actions of governments as they
influence the exchange rate is not examined in the
typical asset approach model. Incorporation of additional
equations explaining the systematic part of the authorities'
behavior would help improve upon the estimation results.
Secondly, the exchange rate, together with other macro-
economic variables, are determined in a general equilibrium
framework by the interaction of flow and stock conditions.
Hence the asset market equation may be too simple to
capture all the influences on the exchange rate. The
theoretical analysis under a set of assumptions may be
correct, even though its empirical form is inadequate
to fit the facts.
The Model
The general features of a bilateral exchange rate
model relate to assumptions concerning equilibrium in
the money markets in the two countries, and the condition
of purchasing power parity. In this section the bilateral
134
exchange rate model developed in Chapter 3 will be tested

using data from the U.S., Germany and Netherlands. The
money demand functions for the domestic country (U.S.)
and the foreign country (Germany) are specified as:
^ (48)
^ (49)
From Equations 48 and 49, we obtain
(50)
j^d p*A*Y*ê"^
Equation 50 is modified to include a time trend in the

relative money demands. Hence we have
_ PAYê"^^^*"*"^^ ^ôT fc..

P*Â*Y^ôvnF^^hry
This means that the time series is randomly fluctuating

around an average level that changes in a linear or
straight-line fashion over time. Hence, S provides an
estimate of the trend in relative demand for money,
since
135
. _ dLn(M^/M*^) _ 1 .
' ar —3T
In equilibrium, the demand for real money equals the real

money supply. These two real money market equilibrium
conditions, together with the purchasing power parity
yield the estimating exchange rate equations, in log
linear form.
S = + g^(m-m*) + g2(a*-a) + 63(y*-y) + - g^T + U
From the theoretical analysis, x = (S^_^^-S^)/S^],

hence the forward premium on exchange rates can be used,
since it is predominantly influenced by speculative
factors, and hence is a better empirical proxy for the
type of interest rate stressed by monetary theory. In
actual fact, the interest rate is not an independent
variable; the interest rate, and the exchange rate are
simultaneously determined in a more general equilibrium
model. Therefore, there is a problem of simultaneous
bias in the estimation equation, when interest rates or
when forward premium are used.
The equation will be estimated in two ways, first
it will be estimated without imposing any of the restric
tions of equality between the domestic and foreign
136
parameters. And secondly, the restrictions will be

imposed and the equation estimated.
Empirical Results
The time period undertaken by this study is from
January 1972 to December 1980. One hundred and eight
observations of monthly data are used for the empirical
work within the above time period. Exchange rates
began to float in 1972 and hence, the reason for choosing
the above time period. Monthly data on all variables
were obtained from the International Financial Statistics,
published by the International Monetary Fund.
The exchange rate equation is estimated using
ordinary least square regression procedure. The results
are presented in Table 10 below. This is the unrestricted
model. The values for the multiple correlation coefficient
(R2), the standard error (SE), the first order auto
correlation (p) and the Durbin-Watson Statistic (DT-J)
are listed for the estimated equation.
The elasticity of the exchange rate with respect
to the domestic money supply has the expected sign but
is not significant. The elasticity of the exchange
rate with respect to the domestic real income has the
predicted sign and is also significant, however, with
respect to the foreign real income, the exchange rate
137
Table 10. Unrestricted OLS estimates for S(DK/$)
Parameter/
Variable Estimate T-ratio Prob > |T|
Intercept -0.713 -0.502 0.616

M 0.149 0.685 0.494
M* 0.262 0.792 0.429
Y -0.435 -1.611 0.110
Y* 0.025 0.107 0.914
A 0.167 2.490 0.014
A* 0.211 4.594 0.001
FP 0.438 0.511 0.611
T -0.013 -6.192 0.001
= 0.9167 S.E = 0.003 p = 0.748 DW = 0.48
elasticity even though it has the predicted sign, is

insignificant. The parameter estimate on the real
bonds held by German residents also turned out with a
sign which is in contrast to the prediction of the asset
market model, but however, very insignificant. The
estimate on the real bonds held by the U.S. residents has
the predicted sign and is highly significant. The
coefficient on the forward premium has the predicted
138
sign but slightly insignificant. This may be due to the

fact that the forward premium is not a good proxy
for the interest rate differential. Aliber (1973)
points out that the interest rate parity theorem will
not hold if the assets are issued in different countries
and there is some exchange control. And Hodrick (1976)
claims that controls were adopted in Germany in February
1973 as a result of massive capital inflows into Germany
at the end of the Bretton Woods fixed-parity system.
The effect of these controls was to drive a wedge between
the real interest rate in Germany and the real interest
rate in the U.S., and the rest of the world. The
coefficient on the time trend variable has the predicted
sign and is highly significant, showing that there is
actually a significant trend in the relative demands for
money and hence in the exchange rate. In general, the
results obtained are not reasonably satisfactory, compared
to the predictions of the model. The model, however,
explains over 90% of the variation in the exchange rate,
with a standard error of 0.003.
The problem of serial correlation is a frequent one
when using time series data. The stochastic disturbance
terms in part reflect variables not included explicitly
in the model, and these may change slowly over time.
It can therefore be expected that the stochastic disturbance
139
term at one observation may be related to the stochastic

disturbance terms at nearby observations. Serial
correlation results in least squares estimates that are
not efficient and also results in the failure of the
usual statistical tests of significance.
The Durbin-Watson statistic from the equation estimated
indicate the presence of first-order serial correlation
in the residuals. Hence, the ordinary least squares
estimation procedure is inefficient. Such first-order
serial correlation takes the form of a first-order
autoregressive scheme. The following relationship
then are assumed to hold for the disturbance terms:
= pU^_^ + all t. !P | < 1
where p is the first order auto correlation coefficient

of the U series; and is a residual stochastic disturbance
term, which is assumed to satisfy the assumptions of the
basic regression model, including absence of serial
correlation:
E(V^) = 0
"t+s> = S -0
= 0 for s f 0
140
To correct for the serial correlation in the residuals,

the original model has to be transformed. One of the
most accurate procedures is the Durbin's two-stage
procedure. First the matrices Y, X and U are transformed
in the following manner:
TY = TX + TU
The T matrix is approximated by
-P 1 0 0
0 -p 1 0
T =
0 0 0 -p 1 0
0 0 0 0 -p 1
In matrix form, the original model is written as
+ U, (52)
Lagging one period and multiplying by p, yields
PYt-l - + ""t-l (53)
subtracting 53 from 52 we obtain

141
- P?t_l = (Xt - pXt-l) + Ut - %t-l (54)
and hence
\ = pYc_i + - pXt_i)3 + (55)
The estimated value of p is obtained by fitting Equation

55 and the calculated value for p is then substituted
into the T matrix. The AUTOREG PROCEDURE, available in
SAS can be used to estimate the parameters of a linear
model whose error term is assumed to be an autoregressive
process.
The exchange rate equation without any parameter
restrictions, and corrected for the first order auto
correlation is shown in Table 11 below. After correcting
for the first order autocorrelation among the residuals,
the results are significantly improved. In particular,
the elasticities of the exchange rate with respect to
domestic and foreign money supplies have the predicted
signs. The elasticities with respect to the domestic
and the foreign real incomes do not have the signs
predicted by the model; however, they are not statistically
significant. The elasticities with respect to the domestic
and foreign real bond holdings turned out with the signs
predicted by the model, but are not statistically different
from zero. The parameter estimate for the forward
142
Table 11. Unrestricted estimates for S(DM/$) corrected

for first order autocorrelation
Parameter
Variable estimate T-ratio Prob > [T|
Intercept 0.636 0.363 0.717

M 0.226 1.800 0.074
M* -0.087 -0.436 0.663
Y 0.036 0.177 0.859
Y* -0.088 -0.333 0.740
A -0.037 -0.577 0.565
A* 0.078 1.158 0.249
FP -0.767 -0.988 0.325
T -0.007 -3.009 0.003
?? = 0.638 S.E = 0.001
premium also turned out with a sign contrary to what is

predicted by the model, but also not significant. The
coefficient on the T variable has the predicted sign
and highly significant.
Multicollinearity is a problem in a study of this
nature, because the variables are very likely to be
correlated across countries. The insignificance of the
143
coefficients may be due in part to the strong correlation

among explanatory variables. In Table 12 below, estimates
of the coefficients are presented when equality restric
tions between domestic and foreign parameters are imposed
and when correlation for the first order autocorrelation
is also made.
Table 12. Estimates for S(DM/$) restrictions imposed,

corrected for first order autocorrelation
Parameter
Variable estimate T ratio Prob > |T|
Intercept 1.564 11.562 0.0001

(M - M*) 0.600 2.845 0.0054
(Y* - Y) -0.421 -1.964 0.0523
(A* - A) 0.062 1.858 0.0661
FP 0.580 0.706 0.4820

T -01006 -13.251 0.0001
•ET = 0.898 S.E = 0.003
144
Imposing the restriction of equality between domestic

and foreign parameters improves the results a great deal.
As shown in Table 12, the money supply elasticities are
close to the prediction of the model, and are highly
significant at the 5 per cent significance level; and it
also has the sign predicted by the model. The elasticities
of the exchange rate with respect to domestic and foreign
values of bond holdings are also consistent with the
prediction of the theory, and highly significant at the
10 per cent significance level. The coefficient on the
forward premium turned out with the sign predicted by
the model, but it is not significantly different from zero.
The parameter estimate for the time trend also turned out
with the predicted sign and is highly significant at the
5 per cent significance level. However, the exchange
rate elasticities with respect to domestic and foreign
real incomes have signs opposite to those predicted by
the model, and are significantly different from zero at the
10 per cent level. As has been explained already, this
might be due to the poor proxies for the real income
variable. The model explains nearly 90 per cent of the
variation in the exchange rate and has a standard error
of 0.003. The overall improvement in the estimation may
be attributed to the reduction of the problem of multi-
collinearity, by imposing the parameter restrictions.
145
The model is also tested using monthly data for the

Netherlands and the United(States over a period from
January 1972 to December 1980, The results are presented
in Table 13 below.
Table 13. Estimates for S(G/$) restrictions imposed,

corrected for first order autocorrelation
Parameter
Variable estimate T ratio Prob >||
T
Intercept 1.912 14.319 0.0001

(m - M*) 0.840 4,793 0.0001
(Y* - YN) 0.222 1.475 0,1434
(A* - AN) 0.059 3,794 0.0003
FPN 0.759 1.234 0.2199
T -0.006 -16,231 0.0001
= 0.911 S.E = 0.002
where MN = Netherlands money supply
YN = Netherlands real income
AN = Netherlands holdings of external bonds
FPN = Forward premium on exchange rate (G/$)
146
All the parameter estimates turned out with the signs

predicted by the asset market approach model. The money
supply coefficient turned out to be 0.84, which is consistent
with the homogeneity postulate predicted by the model,
and also highly significant at the 5 per cent level. The
elasticity of the exchange rate with respect to real
income is 0.222, but not significantly different from
zero at the 5 per cent level. The coefficient on real
bond holdings turned out to be very significant at the
5 per cent level and a parameter coefficient of 0.059.
The coefficient on the forward premium is also not
significant at the 5 per cent level. The model explains
over 91 per cent of the variation in the exchange rate and
has a standard error of 0.002.
Anticipated and Unanticipated Money Supplies

and the Exchange Rate Level
The objective of this section is to test whether
unanticipated and anticipated money changes have explanatory
value for the exchange rate. In order to carry out this
test, anticipated and unanticipated money supplies must
be quantified. This involves forecasting the money
supply process and separating out expected and unexpected
components. A similar approach has been adopted by
Barro (1977 and 1978). In his studies, he analyzes
147
the effects of anticipated and unanticipated money grovth

on output (GNP) and the price level (GNP deflator) for
recent U.S. experience. In his formulation, the money-
growth rate is related to a measure of federal government
expenditure relative to normal (which captures an aspect
of the revenue motive for money creation), a lagged measure
of the unemployment rate (which reflects countercyclical
response of money growth), and two annual lagged values
of money growth (which pick up persistence effects not
captured by the other explanatory variables). In this study,
the money supply forecast is carried out by performing time
series analysis on the monthly money supplies. To be
consistent with the theory in Chapter 3, we have to work
with the logarithms of the money supplies. Hence, Ln(M^)
forms the working series for the time series analysis.
Basically, what this involves is the use of the Ln(M^)
series to predict the logarithm of the money supply
Ln(M^) and the residuals R = Ln(M^) - Ln(M^). These are
the anticipated and unanticipated components of the
money supply. These are used to determine their effects
on the exchange rate. In practice, regression models
are frequently applied with good results to forecasting
time series with dependent or autocorrelated observations.
However, since the Box-Jenkins methodology uses the
dependency in the observations more effectively than do
148
regressions, the Box-Jenkins methodology is likely to

produce more accurate forecasts than the forecasts
produced by the regression approach (Bowerman and
O'Connell, 1979). Moreover, the Box-Jenkins methodology
offers a more systematic approach to building, analyzing,
and forecasting with time series models. The Box-Jenkins
methodology consists of a three step iterative procedure.
The first step is identification. In this step a
tentative model is identified by analysis of the historical
data. The second step is estimation. In this step
the unknown parameters of the tentative model are estimated.
The third step is diagnostic checking. At this stage,
diagnostic checks are performed to test the adequacy of
the model, and to suggest potential improvement. The
three steps described are illustrated below using the
German series.
Identification
This section deals with obtaining information about
a time series, leading to identification of a Box-Jenkins
model. Examination of the sample autocorrelation function
of the Ln(H^) series in Figure 11 indicates stationarity,
since the sample autocorrelation function for the time
series dies down rapidly. The sample partial autocorrela
tion function in Figure 12 cuts off at lag 2, indicating
149
***$********$******$»**$*
*************#***#******
**********$****$*******
**«*****$***$**$*$*****
********$*********?***
***»********?**»**$***
********$*******$****
**$$*#**$***********
*************$******
***********#****$**
****************$**
************?*****
******#***#****#**
***********$»****
*#$************$
***************
»4;4c***********
**************
*************
************
******$****
***********
**********
********
******* *
******* *
*******
******
*****
**** *
****
***
***
**
**
*
*
Figure 11. Samnle autocorrelation function for time

series Ln(M^)
150
-1.0 0.0 1.0

+
******»******$*****#*****
******
****
**
*
*
»
*
*
*
***
**
***
***
*
*
*
*
**
**
*
**
*
*
**
$*
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
I »*
I *
H +
Figure 12. Sample partial autocorrelation function for

time series Ln(M^)
151
that possibly, an autoregressive process of order 2

(AR(2)), might adequately describe the Ln(M^) series.
For some time series applications, the appropriate
Box-Jenkins model can be identified correctly after only
a simple examination of the sample autocorrelation and
sample partial autocorrelation functions of the time
series. However, more often than not, especially with
seasoned time series, one will generally have two or more
candidate models that require further comparison. To
start with, we will compare two models, AR(1) and AR(2).
Model 1: Autoregressive process of order 1

= 6 + î\.i + Et (56)
where = Ln(M^) and is the error term.
Model 2: Autoregressive process of order 2
Zj, - 6 + - «2^C-2 + H (57)
Estimation and Diagnostic Checking

In order to compare and choose among the candidate
models, it is necessary to estimate the parameters of
each of them and to examine their properties. The
diagnostic checking procedures adopted here are based
on the analysis of residuals. These procedures provide
more opportunity for the data themselves to suggest
modifications.
152
Autocorrelation check
Outputs pertaining to the residuals from the fitted
model are useful for diagnostic checking. An effective
way to measure the overall adequacy of the tentative model
is to examine a quantity that determines whether the first
K autocorrelations of the residuals considered together,
indicate adequacy of the model. This is the Box-Pierce
chi-square statistic, and is computed using the formula
K 2
a = (n-d)z r - ( e )
i=l ^
where n = number of observations in the original time series

d = the degree of differencing that was used to
transform the original time series into a
stationary time series.
r2j ( e ) = the square of r^. ( e ) , the sample autocorrela
tion of the residuals at lag 1, that is, the
sample autocorrelation of residuals separated
by a lag of 1 time units.
The modelling process is supposed to account for the
relationships between the observations. If it does account
for these relationships, the residuals should be unrelated,
and hence the autocorrelations of the residuals should be
small. Thus, a large value indicates that the model is
inadequate,
153
Significant autocorrelations in residuals from fitted

models indicate that the error terms are related, and
hence the model is not adequate enough. Such problems
are usually corrected by adding moving average terms to
account for the correlations in the error terms.
The adequacy of a Box-Jenkins model can also be
judged by considering the quantity.
Standard Error S = y
where n = number of observations in the original time series.

p = the number of parameters that must be estimated
in the model.
S measures the overall fit of the model. The smaller S is,
the better the overall fit is considered to be.
Cumulative periodogram check

In fitting time series, it is iôrtant to adequately
take into account the periodic characteristics of the
series. A periodogram is specifically designed for the
detection of periodic patterns. The periodogram of a
time series a^, t = 1, 2, ..., n is defined as
I(fi) = §{( Z a^CosZnfft)^ +( z a Sin2i:f. t)^]

* t=l t ^ t=l ^ ^
154
where = i/n is the ith harmonic of the fundamental

frequency i/n. We shall refer to c(fj) as the normalized
cumulative periodogram
j 2
c(f.) = z I(fi)/nS^
i-1
where S2 is an estimate of 8 2a. For a white noise series,

the plot of c(fj) against fj would be scattered about a
straight line. On the other hand, model inadequacies
would produce non-random a's whose comulative periodogram
could show systematic deviations from this line. Marked
departures from linearity in the cumulative periodogram
plot of the residuals indicate periodicities inadequately
taken account of.
Summary results for models 1 and 2 are presented in
Table 14. Table 14 presents the estimates of the parameters
in each model, also t-statistics for each of the estimates
are given in the parentheses below the estimates. The
table also gives the BoxrPierce chi-square statistic (with
20 degrees of freedom) for each of the fixed -models and
also indicates lags at which the residuals possess
significant autocorrelations. Both models have high
BoxrPierce X2 values, and hence indicate model inadequacy.
From Figures 13 and 14, we realize that both autocorrelations
in residuals from fitted models indicate that the error
155
Table 14. Comparison of models 1 and 2
Model
1 2
No. of regular differences 0 0

No. of seasonal differences 0 0
No. of parameters 1 2
^1 0.9964 0.6654
(40.27) (7.11)
*2 0.3329
(3.57)
6 0.018 0.0083
Box-Pierce (20 D.F.) 19.412 15.384
Significant autocorrelations
in residuals Lag 1 Lag 2
Standard Error 0.0036 0.0032
0.936 0.944
terms are related. The autocorrelation function of

the residuals from AS.(1) model has a significant t-value
at lag 1, as seen in Figure 13. This suggests that a
regular moving average of order 1 (MA(1)) term need be
added to the AR(1) model. The autocorrelation function
**********
***
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
***
***
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
Figure 13. Autocorrelation function of the residuals for model AR(1)

*******
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
<•-•*
*
**
**
** *
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
**
Figure 14. Autocorrelation function of the residuals for model AR(2)

158
of the residuals from the AR(2) model also has a significant

t-value at lag 2 as shown in Figure 14, which also suggests
that a regular moving average term needs to be added to
the AR(2) model. Figures 15 and 16 show the cumulative
normalized periodograms of the residuals of the AR(1) and
AR(2) models, respectively. These two models show signifi
cantly departures from linearity, and hence periodic
characteristics have not been taken account of in these
models. In view of these inadequacies in the AR(1) and
AS.(2) models, a more accurate model has to be used.
The significant t-values of the autocorrelations of the
residuals from both models suggests that a regular moving
average term has to be added to the models to account for
the correlations in the error terms. An addition of a
regular moving average term MA(1) to AR(1) to form an
ARMA(1, 1) model produced the best results. The standard
error estimate was reduced to 0.003 and the Box-Pierce
2
X statistic was also reduced to 9.55. It explains 94.8
per cent of the variation in the Ln(M^) series. From
Figure 17 we observe that the residuals from the ARMA(1, 1)
model has no significant autocorrelation, hence the model
adequately takes account of all the correlations in the
error terms. From Figure 18, the normalized periodogram
of the residuals does not show any significant departure
from linearity, and hence the periodic characteristic
159
Figure 15. Cumulative normalized periodogram for model AR(1)

160
Figure 16. Cumulative normalized periodogran for nodel AR(2)

Figure 17. Autocorrelation function of the residuals for the model AP?1A(1, 1)
162
Figure 18. Cumulative normalized •periodogram for model

APu>lA(l, 1)
163
has been taken care of. The estimated model parameters

yield the following prediction equation.
= 0.0029 + 0.9994Zt_i - 0.5246e^_^ + (58)
(93.28) (6.06)
Box-Pierce X^(20 D.F) = 9.55 = 0.948 DW = 1.91
The estimated values from Equation 58, Z^, and the

residuals = Z - Z^ are used to measure the anticipated
and unanticipated components of money supply, respectively.
In the theoretical analysis of Chapter 3, we established
that the qualitative effects of unanticipated and anticipated
monetary changes are the same, they both lead to spot rate
depreciation, however the quantitative effects are not the
same. The extent of depreciation due to unanticipated
money changes is much greater than depreciation due to
anticipated monetary disturbance. The purpose of this
section is to test this hypothesis. To achieve this,
we have to regress Ln(S^) on Z^, the anticipated component;
R^ the unanticipated component; and the other explanatory
variables discussed in Chapter 3. Table 15 below shows
the empirical results for the U.S.-German data.
The results clearly support the hypotheses derived
in Chapter 3 that the extent of depreciation due to
unanticipated monetary changes is much greater than that
164
Table 15. OLS estimates for anticipated and unanticipated

monetary changes for S(DM/$)
Parameter
Variable estimate T-ratio Prob > |T|
Intercept 3.661 2.804 0.006

Z 0.163 0.800 0.426
R 0.269 1.981 0.050
M* -0.624 -2.561 0.012
Y* - Y -0.328 -1.434 0.155
A* - A 0.174 2.038 0.044
FP -0.136 -0.147 0.884
T -0.002 -1.484 0.141
R^ = 0.889 S.E = 0.004
where Z = anticipated component of German money supply

R = unanticipated component of German money supply
All other variables are as defined before.
due to anticipated changes. The t-statistics show that

the coefficient on Z is not statistically significant,
however the coefficient on R is statistically significant
at the 5 per cent level. The overall fit is quite
165
satisfactory, an R2 value of 0.889 and a standard error

of 0.004 were obtained.
The same procedure was also used for the Netherlands-
U.S. data. The prediction equation for the money supply
is
ZN^ = 0.0007 + i + 0.4893Et_i ^t

(89.4467) (5.2187)
where ZN = anticipated component of the Netherlands money

supply
RN = ZN - ZN = Unanticipated component of the
Netherlands money supply.
The effects of Z~N and RN on the exchange rate (G/$) are

presented in Table 16 below. The Netherlands-U.S. data
also support the hypothesis arrived at in Chapter three
coefficients on ZN and RN are highly significant at the
5 per cent level. All other explanatory variables have
the predicted signs. The overall fit is also good.
2
An R of 0.911 and a standard error of 0.002 were
obtained.
Exchange Rate Volatility

The purpose of this section is to test the hypothesis
of positive correlation between observed exchange rates
166
Table 16. OLS estimates for anticipated and unanticipated

monetary changes for S(G/$)
Parameter
Variable estimate T-ratio Prob > |T|
Intercept 0.483 0.453 0.651

ZN 0.404 5.501 0.001
RN 0.445 5.513 0.001
M* -0.139 -0.783 0.435
Y* - YN 0.048 1.142 0.256
A* - AN 0.061 3.577 0.005
FPN 0.973 1.489 0.139
T -0.007 -5.599 0.001
= 0.911 S.E = 0.002
and the imprecision in the expectations of the time paths

of the exogenous policy variables, as discussed in Chapter 3.
The imprecision in the expectations of the time paths of
the exogenous policy variables is approximated by the
money supply deviation from the expected money supply.
The test is conducted using data from Netherlands and
Germany and the results are presented in Table 17 below.
The correlation coefficients are shown in Table 17
and the figures in parentheses show the significance
167
Table 17. Correlation between exchange rates and money

supply deviation from expected money supply
R RN
S 0.031
(0.754)
SN 0.0101
(0.918)
where S = (DM/$) exchange rate
R = German money supply deviation from the expected
money supply.
SN = Netherlands-U.S. (G/$) exchange rate
RN = Netherlands money supply deviations from the
expected money supply.
probability of a correlation coefficient. This is the

probability that a value of the correlation coefficient
as large or larger in absolute value than the one calculated
would have arisen by chance, were the two random variables
truly uncorrelated. These results indicate that the data
decisively reject the hypothesis of correlation between
the two variables, even though the correlation coefficients
are all positive as predicted.
168
CHAPTER 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
This study set out to examine the effects of

unanticipated and anticipated monetary policies on the
economy, and to test the derived hypotheses. In the
model developed in Chapter 3, it is clear that the value
of a floating exchange rate is mainly determined by
conditions of asset market equilibrium, given existing
stocks of money, domestic assets, and foreign assets.
In our model, the excess of income over expenditures
is equal to the rate at which the home country acquires
claims on the rest of the world. If a country is running
a surplus on the trade balance, so that net foreign assets
are increasing, this tends to cause the exchange rate
to appreciate, and a deficit in the trade balance with net
foreign assets falling, causes the exchange rate to de
preciate. This is the key to dynamic adjustment of the
exchange rate as we move from short run to long run.
Under rational expectations, the exchange rate equation
establishes that the current spot exchange rate is determined
by all of the current and expected future values of the
exogenous variables. Hence, it is necessary to distinguish
between anticipated and unanticipated changes in the
exogenous variables. Hence, in response to an anticipated
change in the money supply, the equilibrium exchange rate
169
adjusts in advance of the expected increase in the money

supply because the demand for money is affected by the
expected rate of inflation which affects the domestic
interest rate. Since the absolute price level will be
higher at t = T (time money is expected to increase), the
inflation rate between t = 0 and t = t must be higher
than was previously expected. This increase in the expected
inflation rate reduces the demand for money at every date
up to t = T, thereby requiring an increase in the absolute
price level and hence the exchange rate at every date up
to t = T. The anticipation of depreciation lowers real
balances, wealth and expenditures, and hence gives rise
to a current account surplus. The process continues up
until t = T, the time the money supply increases. From
then on, the exchange rate depreciation continues but
the increased real balances, wealth and spending now lead
to a deficit and decumulation of foreign assets until
the initial real equilibrium is reattained. l-Then the
monetary expansion is by open market operation, then
whether the exchange rate overshoots or undershoots its
steady state target at t = % depends on the economic
structure. In particular, if 8 (the fraction of real
wealth held in the form of real balances) is small, the
exchange rate undershoots and if 6 is large, the exchange
rate overshoots its steady state target.
170
An unanticipated change in the stock of money that

is expected to persist is neutral. If it is an open
market operation, the exchange rate depreciates more
than in proportion to the increase in the money stock.
As the system converges towards the new equilibrium,
foreign assets are accumulated until the current account
is back in balance.
These hypotheses derived in Chapter 3 are tested
in Chapter 4, using U.S.-German and U.S.-Netherlands
data sets. The results obtained from the two data sets
indicate that the data decisively support the hypotheses
that the changes in the exchange rates observed immediately
after a policy shift are larger, the greater the extent
to which the policy shift catches economic participants
by surprise. The data sets also explain in each case
about 90 per cent of the variability in the exchange rate,
and each set also supports the conclusion that monetary
expansion leads to currency depreciation in the short run.
The formulation of the present model reflects the
recent development by Dombusch and Fischer (1980). In
relation to other recent studies, it is interesting to
note that these results reinforce the results of other
studies. In particular, Wilson (1979) analyzes the
effect of temporary anticipated monetary expansion
and finds that the larger the increase in the money stock,
171
the larger the instantaneous impact on the exchange rate

and the further into the future it is expected that the
increase will occur, the less the current impact. Similar
results are also implied by Brock (1975), who analyzes
anticipated monetary policy in the context of a perfect
foresight monetary model.
Some care must be taken in the interpretation of
the dependence of the exchange rate on the various
explanatory variables. This model assumes that all the
explanatory variables are exogenous within the framework.
And when this does not hold, the application of an ordinary
least squares estimation procedure results in biased
estimates. This is because the exchange rate together
with some of these variables are simultaneously determined
in a more general equilibrium framework.
Many of the exchange rate determination models have
been used to explain the effects of monetary expansion,
both in the short run and in the long run and virtually
none of the models adds significantly to our insights
about the effects of fiscal policy on exchange rates.
An improved understanding of exchange rate behavior requires
better models not only of fiscal policies but also of
the process of wealth accumulation, role of policy mixes,
and also of exchange rate expectations. This study hopes
172
to have provided some answers to some of these vital

questions.
173
REFERENCES
Aliber, R. Z. "The Interest Rate Parity Theorem: A

Reinterpretation." Journal of Political Economy
81 (December 1973): 1451-1459.
Barro, R. J. "Unanticipated money growth and unemployment
in the United States." American Economic Review
67 (March 1977): 101-115.
Barro, R. J. "Unanticipated money, Output and the Price
Level in the United States." Journal of Political
Economy 86 (August 1978): 549-580.
Bilson, I. F. 0. "The Monetary Approach to the Exchange
Rate--Some Empirical Evidence." Staff Papers,
International Monetary Fund 25 (March 1978): 48-75.
Bowerman, B. L. and O'Connell, R. T. Forecasting and
Time Series. North Scituate, Mass.: Duxbury Press
(1979).
Branson, W. H. "The Dual Roles of the Government Budget
and the Balance of Payments in the Movement from
Short Run to Long Run Equilibrium." Quarterly
Journal of Economics 90 (1976): 345-367.
Branson, W. H., Halttunnen, H. and Masson, P. "Exchange
Rates in the Short Run. The Dollar-Deutschemark
Rate." European Economic Review 10 (1977): 303-324.
Brock, W. A. "A Simple Perfect Foresight Model." Journal
of Monetary Economics 1 (April 1975): 133-150.
Clements, K. W. and Frenkel, J. A. "Exchange Rates,
Money, and Relative Prices: The Dollar-pound in the
1920s." Journal of International Economics 10
(1980): 249-262.
Dombusch, R. "Expectations and Exchange Rate Dynamics."
Journal of Political Economy 84 (December 1976):
1161-1176.
Dombusch, R. and Fischer, S. "Exchange Rates and the
Current Account." American Economic Review 70
(December 1980): 960-971,
174
Fischer, S. "Anticipations and the Nonneutrality of

Money." Journal of Political Economy 87 (1979:
225-252.
Frenkel, J. A. "A Monetary Approach to the Exchange Rate:
Doctrinal Aspects and Empirical Evidence." Scandinavian
Girton, L. and Roper, D. "A Monetary Model of Exchange
Market Pressure Applies to the Post-War Canadian
Experience." American Economic Review 67 (September
1977): 537-548.
Hodrick, R. J. "The Monetary Approach to the Determination
of Exchange Rates: Theory and Empirical Evidence."
Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Graduate School of
Business, University of Chicago, 1976.
Hodrick, R. J. "An Empirical Analysis of the Monetary
Approach to the Exchange Rate," in J. Frenkel and H.
Johnson (eds.), The Economics of Exchange Rates:
Selected Studies. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley,
1978.
Kouri, P. J. K. "The Exchange Rate and the Balance of
Payments in the Short Run and in the Long Run: A
Monetary Approach." Scandinavian Journal of Economics
78 (April 1976): 280-304.
Mussa, M. "The Exchange Rate, the Balance of Payments,
and Monetary and Fiscal Policy Under a Regime of
Controlled Floating." Scandinavian Journal of
Economics 78 (1976): 229-248.
Mussa, M. "A Model of Exchange Rate Dynamics." Unpublished
Article, Graduate School of Business, University of
Chicago, 1979.
Scandinavian Journal of Economics 78 (1976): 386-412.
Schafer, J. R. "The Macroeconomic Behavior of a Large
Open Economy with a Floating Exchange Rate." Unpublished
Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Economics, Yale
University, 1976.
175
Turnovsky, S. J. "The Dynamics of Fiscal Policy in an Open

Economy." Journal of International Economics 6
(1976): 115-142.
Turnovsky, S. J. and Kingston, G. H. "Monetary and Fiscal
Policies under Flexible Exchange Rates and Perfect
Myopic Foresight in an Inflationary World." Scandinavian
Wilson, C. A. "Anticipated Shocks and Exchange Rate
Dâmics." Journal of Political Economy 87 (1979):
639-647.
176
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
In preparing this dissertation, I have benefited

a great deal from the supervision of my committee chairman.
Dr. Harvey Lapan. I owe special thanks to him for his
detailed suggestions and constant inspiration and advice.
This experience has deepened my understanding of economics
considerably. I acknowledge a very special debt to Dr.
Walter Enders for his careful reading and many useful
comments. I am grateful to the other members of my
graduate committee. Oris. James Stephenson, Dennis Starleaf,
Wallace Huffman, and Roy Hickman for their invaluable
services.
I am personally grateful to Napoleon for the extreme
patience and understanding during the period when this
dissertation was in preparation. I am also happy to thank
B. 7. Thorbs and A. Tegene for their service which was a
necessary condition for the completion of this dissertation.
177
APPENDIX 1. DATA
Time Period Under Study

The time period undertaken by this study is from
January 1972 to December 1980. One hundred and eight
observations of monthly data are used for the empirical
work within the above time period. Exchange rates began
to float in 1972 and hence the reason for choosing the
above time period.
Variables and Definitions

S(DM/$) These series are period averages of deutsche mark/
dollar exchange rates quoted as units of German
Mark per U.S. dollar.
SN(G/$) Period averages of guilder-dollar exchange rates
quoted as units of guilder per U.S. dollar.
M German money supply (Ml) in billions of marks.
U.S. money supply (Ml) in billions of dollars.
MN Netherlands money supply (Ml) in billions of
guilders.
Y German industrial production index (1975 = 100).
These indices are used as proxies for the levels
of real national income, since they are widely
used as leading indicators of gross national
product.
Y* U.S. industrial production index (1975 = 100).
178
YN Netherlands industrial production index (1975 = 100).

A German holdings of real U.S. bonds.
A* U.S. holdings of real U.S. bonds.
AN Netherlands holdings of real U.S. bonds.
FP Forward premium on the deutsche mark-dollar exchange
rate.
FPN Forward premium on the guilder-dollar exchange rate.
Derived variables
Z Predicted German money supply Ln(M^)
ZN Predicted Dutch money supply Ln(MN^)
R Unpredicted German money supply
Ln(M^.) - Ln(M^)
RN Unpredicted Dutch money supply
Ln(MN^) - LN(MN^)
Data Sources
Monthly data on all variables are obtained from the
International Financial Statistics, published by the
International Monetary Fund.
179
APPENDIX 2. DERIVATION OF THE FORMULA FOR

(EXPECTED RATE OF DEPRECIATION)
AS
~S"
Using the Taylor series
Ln[l + ^] = ^ - ^(^)^ + ^(^)3
Hence
= Ln[l + ^] +|(^)^ - +
AS
= Ln[l 4- -^] if we assume higher oowers
be relatively small.
= Lnt§-±g^]
= Ln[!§±l]
^t
Hence,
= Ln(S^^^) - Ln(S^)
180
APPENDIX 3. DERIVATION OF PARAMETER VALUES

FOR EQUATIONS DERIVED UNDER FULL RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS
The two equations obtained under full rational expectations

are:
- (1 + %)pt - = -V^ - (e^ + m*)
®t+l - '-8\ - ^t+l + (=o - 8°*>
These two equations can be collapsed into one equation

to form
%Pt+2 " + [bQ(l+X)-g]p^
= (bQ-g)V^ - + (bo'l)(s^+m*) + (e^-gm*) (59)
or
â^+2 " + [b^(l4-X)-g]a^
= -^gVf+i + gXV_ - + (1+X)Z^^T - (e^ + gei) (60)
In the steady state, p^^2 = Pt+1 " ?t ^ ?*%; m^+l = ™t "

V^_j_^ = V^ = 0 and = 0.
181
Hence,
P* = tn* + !g°
Consider the equation
X - r(l + X + Xb^) + r^[(l + x)bQ - g] = 0
and define
a2 ~ ^
= -(1 + X + XBGI)
ao = (1 + x)bo - g
Hence,
O + «1 + 02 = bo - g - 1
q
The roots of the quadratic equation are
2
-a^ + /Co 2 "
^ = zz
2
-«2 ~ /(a 2 "
s =
182
Conjecture at a solution of the form
Pt = Yo + + Y22Vt+iS^ + Ys^Zt+l+i^"" + Y4^^t+l+i^'"
+ Yseî
Define ^2 = ^^t+2+i^''
o o
^1 ^^t+3+i^'
o ^2 ^^t+3+i^
o
Hence
«1
'^'t+2+i^^ = 't+2 + W + +
o
and
-^t+l+i-
o ^t+1 ^t+2- "'" ^t+3~
- \+i +
and
= Vt + W + +
O
\ + 't+i'^ +
183
We can do similarly for N^, ^2* Hence the second

order differential Equation 59 becomes
02[ Yq + + 72^2 "^3% y^2^
+ ®I[Y + Y^rN^ + Y2SN2 +

o + Y4SM2 + (YI+Y2)\+I
+ (y3 + yfy>^t+2^
+ + Y2S^^2 ^3^^1 "^4^^ + (Yi +Y2)^t
+ (y3 + 74)2^4-1 + (Yl? + Y2^)^t4.W' (%3^-^ X4®^^t+2^
= i\ - - V^+i - (\ - 1)(ei + M*) + e^ - gm*)
Rearranging terms:
2
'''o^"0'^"l''"®'2^ Yl^^(*2 °1^ + «0^ )
+ Y2^^(G2 ^ "'l^ o ^ S ^ )
+ Y3^^(02 + a^r + a^r^)

+ Y/^2(^2 + OgS^)
+ «q Cyi + Y2>\ + «0(73 ''4'^t+l
+ Og/Yir + Y2S)V^^^ + Og/Ysr + Y4S)Zt+2
+ «i/Yi + Y2^\+1 + *1(73 + Y4)Zt+l
= (b^-gyv^ - - (bg-l)(e2^-ha^)+(e^-gm*)
184
Therefore,
+ oi(Y3+Y4)Zt+2 + °o^^Y3r+Y4S)Z^+2 + (73+74)^t+l^
= (bo-g)V^ - + (b^-1)(e^^+m*) + (e^-gm*) (61)
a-i
We know that r = - + D
«0 ^=0
where D is the discriminant of the characteristic equation;

hence
S = .^ ^
°o
= r -^
°o
n
and — = 2r + —
°o «0
Equating coefficients in Equation 61 we obtain
(a) Oq/Yi + Y2) = " 2

bo - S
185
(b) a^(Y2+Y2) + + Y2S] = -1
+ ajv^r + - Yi)(r - i)l = -1
a, a-. a, b - g
^(bi - g) + »o[n<2r + ^)- (r + ^)(-°^)] - -1
0 0 0
°1 b - g
»o[Yi(2r + - r(-2_ )] = -1
° ^ "o "o
Y2^ - rCbg - g) = -1
rCb^ - g) - 1
Yl
and
bo - g
^2 = - ^1
(c) a^CYg + Y4) = -]
(Y3 + Y4) = ^
o
186
(d) a^CYg + Y4) + + y^S) = 0
We can show that

YgD + r = 0
^3 = if
and
1 . r
Y4 - - ^+ D
o
We can use the same procedure to derive the coefficients

in Equation 26.
Derivation of the Homogenous Solution

At t = 0 Equation 22 becomes
o o o o ~
Hence,
0 0 , 0 0 0 0 . 0 0
4*g ~ 3-Q ~ (^Q ~ [^^zV^r + "i" ^4^^1+i^ ]

o o ,0 o
(a) For a permanent unanticipated pure monetary expansion.

187
(b) For a permanent unanticipated open market operation,
+5 = *0 - *o
= -dZ^ since <|)^ remains the same, but a^ goes

down by the amount purchased.
(c) For a permanent anticipated pure monetary expansion.
T-1 jT i
= - [ Z (Onr + <t)«s )(-dm)]
^ i=0 ^
(d) For a permanent anticipated open market operation;
<^5 = -[Ê^((^^r^ + *2S^)(-dm) + + (i)^S''~^)dZ]
Having obtained solutions for ij)^ we can obtain solutions

for Y5 through the following relationship:
_ ^5
^5 X0^ - iL-i-X)
188
APPENDIX 4. DERIVATION OF RELATIONSHIP

BETWEEN Y5 AND
Equations 23 and 24 are rewritten here for convenience.
- (l+x)p^ ~ ®t ~ ~^t ~
't+1 - bo^t - SPt = - ^t+1 + - 5°^*)
This can be written in a matrix form as
1+X 1
e^ + m*
^t+1 X X Pt K
=
+
^t+1
g bo ^t •g^t - Zt+1 + - gm*
1
Let Pt ^5
^t *5
hence
X y,
Pt+1
't+1 X*,
189
Therefore
-, e^+m*
X.5 - (4^) -1 Y5
=
- X - \
+ X^
- s -^0 *5 gV^ - Z^-î+e^-gm*
The complementary fimction is therefore given by
X 1+X 1 0
X X
g X - b 0
and hence.
(X - l±i)(X - b^) - I =0
XX - (xb^ + X + 1)X + (1 x)b^ - g =0
02^ - a^X + Oq = 0
Where 02» «g are as defined in the text. The roots

of this equation are X^ X2 given by
^ 1 ~ ®1 ~ r ^ 2 ~ ®2 ~ I
190
The relationship between and 4»^ is given by
1 0
(61 - ^) -X Y5
-g ®1 - ^0 <^5 0
and hence
75(81 - -0 (62)
-gYg + *5(81 - b^) = 0 (63)
Let us note that < 0, hence if > 0 it implies

that < 0 and if < 0 it implies that 4»^ > 0, That is
Y5 • '{'5 <0. From Equation 63 we have
Therefore,
= Ï5*5
- "o
Hence, we conclude that 0 and therefore from
Equation 63, if Yg > 0 it implies that < 0 and if y^ < 0
it implies that > 0. From Equation 62, we can therefore
make the following conclusions: if > 0, that is if
191
+ *28^)6111 - + *4S^"l)dZ > 0
then
«5
^5 - xei- (1 +X) ^ 0
And secondly, if < 0 that is if
Z (<i),r^ + <j),S^)dm " + 4vS^"l)dZ < 0

1=0 ^ ^ ^
then
•5
•<5'xe - (1% X) '°

Asset Market Approach To Exchange Rate Determination PDF

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Asset Market Approach To Exchange Rate Determination PDF

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and

Retrospective Theses and Dissertations

Asset market approach to exchange rate

Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd

The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand

2. When an image on the film is obliterated with u round black mark it is an

4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography,

Mensah, Isaac Quao

ASSET MARKET APPROACH TO EXCHANGE RATE DETERMINATION

loy/a State University PH.D. 1982

Isaac Quao Mensah

A Dissertation Submitted to the

Signature was redacted for privacy.

In Cha^^ of Maj Work

Signature was redacted for privacy.

Signature was redacted for privacy.

Iowa State University

Figure 9. The time path of the external assets level

Table 14. Comparison of models 1 and 2 155

Recently, increased attention has been focused on

markets for flow of funds, instead of by the conditions

This approach is used by Frenkel (1976) and Kouri (1976).

Objectives of the Study

of alternative assets would enlarge the range of analysis

path in which asset prices adjust in part to reflect

Because money is viewed as an asset, changing the money

Outline of the Study

expected rate of depreciation of the domestic currency;

rate and also to examine how the small country result

CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW

Theories of the Exchange

^This was established in the summary remarks to the

exchange is determined by the value of one's exports and

and foreign goods, then that implies that the exchange

to domestic country and this is the mechanism by which

for equilibrium. These models are usually single country

others. In this approach, two forms of moentary expansion,

foreign assets are perfect substitutes, then sterilized

from short run equilibrium to long run equilibrium,

leads to currency depreciation in the short run; and that

effect of disequilibrium in the market for domestic goods

These results however, are based on simplified models

combining elements of the efficient market and monetary

analysis. Thirdly, the models in existence assume that

a complete theory of exchange rates determination, because

The ideal approach for this study will be to deal

CHAPTER 3. THE THEORETICAL MODEL

This chapter presents the basic methodology to

General Features of the

is fixed. We have the competitive arbitrage assumption

where P is the domestic money price of the domestic

issue the bonds. The foreign bonds are index bonds

where W is the private sector real wealth, M is the stock

or stable. The assumption of perfect capital mobility

where i is the domestic nominal interest rate, and x is

^ = 8(r* + X, Y)U (4)

Substituting Equation 2 into Equation 4 yields

p • L(Y, r* + x) > 0, < 0 (6)

Given the nominal money supply, M, the price level

Where E is real expenditures, and it depends on real

g = AY^e-^(^* + (r*)-^ (8)

Using Equations 1 and 8, we can solve for the equilibrium

For a given stock of domestic money, the price level

^t = m I® - ^t - ^^t + ^rt + '^E^CSt+i) - Pt] (12)

2t(St+i) - m^tf™t+i • t+i • Y^t+i + r*t+i

this section. Rewriting Equation 15 here for con

An independent increase in real output raises real expendi

Gt = o + l^™t+i""'' $2™t+i^'' ^s^^t+l+i^""

+ 4^^t4-l4-i^^ 5®1 *6® (22)

If r < -1, and 0 < s < 1, then our a priori restric

+ [E{(3ri + - 8t\(3rt+^ + <{.45^"^^)