Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Kreativitas dan
Inovasi
Potential Problem Analysis
14
Teknik Teknik Mesin W131700019 Dr. Ir. Ignatius Agung Wibowo M.Sc.
Abstrak Kompetensi
The implementation of Potential Problem After reading this module you are
Analysis technique for idea implementation. expected to be able to apply
Potential Problem Analysis.
14.1. Introduction
This method (part of Kepner Tregoe’s (q.v.) widely used problemsolving approach) is
designed to provide a challenging analysis of a developed idea or action plan in order to
forestall ways in which it might go wrong. See also: Bullet proofing and Negative
brainstorming.
It is ‘rational’ rather than ‘creative’ in orientation, but as in many creativity techniques,
rational frameworks can provide an excellent source of creative triggers if approached in an
imaginative spirit. It is closely related to some of the methods used in identifying potential
faults in complex hardware systems.
Because the effort required to carry out the analysis thoroughly is likely to be appreciable, it
would normally be reserved for the finally selected action plan (or perhaps the final handful
of options).
1. Define the key requirements These are the ‘musts’: outputs, actions or events that must
happen if the implementation is to be successful. Failure of any of these is likely to cause
problems.
2. List and explore all potential problems For each of the key requirements you have just
identified, list all ‘potential problems’, i.e. possible ways it could go wrong (a technique such
as Negative brainstorming might help) and explore each of them (a technique such as Five
Ws and H might help). If you have listed large numbers of potential problems, you may want
to make a preliminary estimate of the overall risk (see below) that each problem creates, so
that you can concentrate the rest of the analysis on those that offer the greatest risk.
3. List possible causes for each potential problem Identify possible causes of each potential
problem, and the risk associated with each. Risk reflects both the likelihood of it happening,
and the severity of the impact if it did, so that ‘high likelihood/high impact’ causes present the
highest risk.
4. Develop preventative actions where possible It is almost always better to prevent a
problem rather than cope with it after it has happened, so where possible devise ways of
preventing potential problem causes or minimising their effects. Estimate the residual risk
that might still remain even if preventative action were taken.
5. Develop contingency plans where necessary Where problems would have serious effects,
but you can’t prevent them, or there is a high residual risk even if you do, develop
contingency plans.
The planning group should be briefed on the results of the vulnerability assessment,
consider the recommendations of this assessment, and begin planning.
Potential problem analysis (4) is a technique for identifying preventive strategies and
response and recovery strategies for problems that could arise in a given situation. Its value
is that it systematically breaks down a problem into its components. Applied to emergency
management, it can lead to innovative and effective strategies. The technique involves:
- identifying a hazard or hazardous situation;
- listing potential problems;
- determining causes;
- developing preventive strategies;
- developing response and recovery strategies, and trigger events for these strategies.
Preventive strategies are ways of reducing the probability of the problem, thereby reducing
susceptibility. Response and recovery strategies are ways of reducing the seriousness of a
problem that does occur, thereby increasing resilience.
At least two things are required to initiate a response or recovery strategy: a trigger event,
and a person or organization responsible for initiating the strategy. The trigger event should
indicate when the strategy is required; it could be an alarm, a warning, or the emergency
itself. The responsible person or organization should be capable of initiating the strategy and
the responsibility should be predetermined. To take a simple example, when flood water
(hazard) reaches the 2-metre level at a particular bridge (trigger), a landowner (responsible
person) contacts three neighbours so that they can move their animal stock to higher ground
(response strategy).
A potential problem analysis can be performed by one person alone, but much better results
will be obtained by a planning group. The planning group will also have a greater
commitment to the strategies if it has been involved in their development.
Hazard: ..........................................
The next step is to consider causes in order to develop appropriate and effective preventive
strategies and response and recovery strategies. The example can be extended with the
potential problems relating to smoke. Some sources of smoke problems include:
- smoke caused by the ignition of garbage or other material that should have been
removed;
- toxic smoke caused by burning of synthetic materials in furnishings;
- smoke caused by continued supply of oxygen to fire;
The outputs of a potential problem analysis can be used in various ways (see Table 14.2),
most of which are later steps in the planning process.
Output Use
Possible response and recovery strategies Determine whether existing resources will
support a particular strategy
Trigger events Ensure that trigger events are part of the alerting
and warning system