Performance Incentive

2018-2019
supported by:

1. Teacher
Development
Program

2. Quality
Assessment System
Emphasis on Quality
Quality Performance  School Performance
 School Performance

Number of Students
School KPI
(Key Performance Indicator for the school)
Bobot (2018)
POSISI KPI
KOMPETENSI
KARYAWAN Routine Non Routine Development School
Operator 70%
30%
100% N/A N/A N/A
Staff 70%
30%
80% 20% N/A N/A
Specialist 70%
30%
40% 60% N/A N/A
Coordinator/ 80%
Deputy Head/ 30% 45% 10% 15%
20%
Dept. Head/
Principal
Deputy 90%
Director/Director 10%
10% 40% 20% 30%
 School Performance

INCENTIVE
Individual contributions
Reflection Focus
1. Target/KPI
2. Performance
Results
School KPI 2018-2019
1.289 Students

Achievement
1.192 Students
(June 2019 data)

92 %
Performance & Incentive System
 KPI

Qualified for July - September

grading review?

Grading
Performance Management Review
July – June
Areas for
Improvement Grade
improved?

Performance UMP,
Incentive October Inflation

Adjustment
 Performance Incentive Scheme
Performan Score Perfor
ce mance
Performance Perf. Performance Category Incent
Category Score Incentive ive
High Selected from Score A△
Performing 3,5 and above
Score 3
Above Score 3,1 and above B△
Performing and ABC △ Performing
above
- Performing Score 3 – 3,09 C△
“Not Yet” Below
Performing score 3
 Performance Incentive Scheme
Special Considerations 2018-2019

Performance Perf. Performance

Category Score Incentive

Score 3
Performing and ABC △ Consideration: Management Transition
above
Rising Score 2,6 –
D△
Performance 2,9
“Not Yet” Below - “Not Yet” score 2,5 -
Performing score 3 Performance and below
 Performance Incentive 2018-2019
Performance Performance Performance Incentive
Category Score
High Performing Selected from A△
Score 3,5 and 150% Salary
above
Above Performing Score 3,1 and B△
above 100% Salary
Performing Score 3 – 3,09 C△ 50% Salary
“Rising Performance” Score 2,6 – 2,9 D△ 25% Salary
“Not Yet” Performing Score 2,5 and - -
below