Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
*This is a writeup based on my own (limited) understanding of the subject (and I may be
wrong since I am not bio-trained), thus I apologize if I got any of the concepts wrong.
Thesis:
PFNX is a biotech expression technology platform that has multiple biosimilar candidates
under its pipeline and a strong cash balance which means that it is unlikely face dilution for
the next year or 2. Furthermore, it has a near term catalyst that could propel its revenue to
several times of its current revenue as it is waiting for its FDA approved biosimilar drug to
Forteo (which has a sales of 1.6 bil in 2018) to be given a AP rating by the FDA. If multiple
biosimilars are approved and commercialised with the help of the PFNX platform, this
company would likely be worth several times its current value.
Basically, the expression technology platform solves the problems of molecular cloning
mentioned above as seen from the picture below and speeds up the development of certain
drugs.
Competitive advantage
3 elements differentiates the expression technology from other companies.
• Robust Protein Production Organism
• Creation of Extensive Library of Protein Expression Variants
• Robotically Enabled High Throughput Screening
We have replaced the traditional, trial and error approach to protein production with a
simultaneous, parallel processing model that allows the construction and testing of
thousands of unique protein production variables in parallel. We believe our platform
delivers a significant competitive advantage for protein production, including higher
accuracy, greater degree of protein purity, speed and lower costs.”
Current development:
PFNX is now developing biosimilars of major drugs that are soon to be off-patent. It has
several programs under its pipeline as seen above.
Progress of some of the program:
1) Forteo (PF708)
• FDA approval in October
• Biosimilar called PF708 is now approved.
• 50% of gross profits in U.S. from generics firm Alvogen if AP rated (AP-rated means
the product in question is an injectable product that the FDA has assigned an “AP”
rating signifying that the FDA has classified the product as “therapeutically
equivalent” to a particular reference listed product)
• 60% ex U.S. pending geography
• Forteo achieved 1.6 bil in global sales in 2018.
Needless to say, if successful, there is likely to be a huge uptick in revenue for Forteo and
little or no incremental cost.
2) Lucentis (PF582)
• Global Lucentis market was approximately $3.7 billion in 2018
• biosimilar candidate PF582
• Phase 1/2 first in human study completed: Met primary objective of demonstrating
similar safety and tolerability between PF582 and Lucentis. Demonstrated consistent
pharmacological activity between PF582 and Lucentis
3) Neulasta (PF529)
• Neulasta global sales in 2018 of $4.5 billion
• biosimilar Candidate PF529
• Production process developed and extensive analytical comparability to reference
product completed
• US FDA feedback for PF529 supports the feasibility of development under the 351(k)
biosimilar pathway
Various economic opportunities:
Because this is a platform technology, there are multiple shots available, in other words, this
company is not likely to be a binary story, but the combination of the potential success of
several potential biosimilar candidates that use this platform and go through the entire FDA
approval process.
Financial part:
A look at its recent 2019 Q3 financials would reveal that the company is expanding fast, and
given the recent approval of the PF708, and the impending commercialisation, it is likely
that there will be a huge uptick in revenue rather quickly. Of course, that would be
dependent on the sales of the actual drug and other variables that are out of the company’s
control.
It is worth noting that the company is in a strong cash position and the current cash position
is actually understated. As pointed out by the management team. “Cash and cash
equivalents as of September 30, 2019 were $32.7 million. I point out, this excludes $13.5
million from milestones earned under our agreements with Jazz and Alvogen of $11 million
and $2.5 million respectively. Pfenex believes that its existing cash and cash equivalents and
cash inflow from operations will be sufficient to meet Pfenex's anticipated cash needs for at
least the next 12 months”
Valuation:
I have no idea how to value this company, but looking at Forteo’s sales for the past year,
one can do a simple calculation and get to an assumption of how much revenue could be
generated from just 1 drug.
This is a fairly conservative estimate, but lets say that AP rating is given, and alvogen is able
to capture 1/3 of the market eventually and gross margin of the biosimilar drug for alvogen
is 20% (it should be higher than that). I do not know the exact gross margin of Forteo as it is
undisclosed, and the gross margin last year is also unlikely to be an accurate representation
of the actual gross margin once it goes off patent.
53 mil is roughly twice its current revenue (15 mil in FY 2018, 32 mil FY2019 Q3 TTM), and
assuming that it is able to do this multiple times given the amount of candidates it has in its
pipeline currently. This company is likely to be a multi bagger.
Even if AP rating is not given, PFNX still have revenue sources from other programs that
would keep it afloat.
Catalyst:
• AP rating for PF708 given
• More collaborations announced or milestones achieved.