In re: Request for bona fide full written disclosure of the structure and organization of the

government of Illinois, other important, urgent matter.

Dear Governor

1. While doing research to help me understand how various state governments operate in a
political sense, I came across some information that has been discovered regarding the
structure of government in North Carolina as it apparently existed in 1946. A copy of one
of the document discovered is attached and marked as Exhibit A for your information and
review.

2. Apparently, the structure in North Carolina at least includes, or did include in 1946:

A. Council of State of North Carolina.

B. Council of State of the State of North Carolina.
C. Governor of North Carolina
D. Governor of the State of North Carolina
E. North Carolina.
F. State of North Carolina.

3. I have the following questions to ask of you regarding to the political structure of Illinois:

A. Does a similar political structure to that of North Carolina’s exist today in Illinois?
In other words, is there a:
(1) Council of State of Illinois.
(2) Council of State of the State of Illinois.
(3) Governor of Illinois
(4) Governor of the State of Illinois
(5) Illinois
(6) State of Illinois.

B. I obtained a copy of the officially printed version of the Illinois Constitution a couple
of years ago that “Includes all amendments approved on or before November 3,
1998”. In addition to term (6), State of Illinois, used numerous times in said
constitution, the term “state of Illinois” is also used in a number of places (article 16,
Sec. 6, and on page 73) which apparently provides evidence of yet another political
entity, the state of Illinois, that is legally and lawfully different from the political
entities known as “the State of Illinois” or simply “Illinois”. In the event that you may
attempt to dismiss said differences offhand, I draw your attention to the attached
Exhibits marked as Exhibit B, Exhibit C, and Exhibit D.

1. Exhibit B show some of the holdings in the Well-settled case State v. Gibson, 697 P. 2d
1216. Of pertinent to my inquiry to you is holding #9, which states, in pertinent part: “State
officials are bound by the definition of ….. promulgated by Congress and, since Congress
has defined …… to be ….., state officials must abide by such a definition.”
2. Exhibit C is a copy of USCS 111. Of pertinent interest is the underlined statement contained
in the HISTORY; ANCILLARY LAWS AND DIRECTIVES portion. Said statement says:
“The word “territory” is not capitalized as there are no longer any Territories.”

3. And, lest these two Exhibits do not provide a “sufficient word to the wise”, consider Exhibit
D which contains copies of two pages from the 1954 Internal Revenue Code. You can at
check out the veracity of Exhibit D at any law library that contains a copy of the 1954
Internal Revenue Code. On said paid pages 480 and page 560, you’ll note that “State”, with
a capital “S”, is defined to include Alaska and Hawaii. Do you know your history well
enough to know what the significance of those definition is to my inquiry to you concerning
the political structure of Illinois? Simply this, Alaska and Hawaii were not admitted into
the “Union” until 1959, and yet, in the 1954 Internal Revenue Code, both were considered
to be a State of the United States. To a man of your years of legal experience, as noted in
your bio at http://www.state.wy.us/governor/meetGovernor.asp, you a “State” and a
“state”, particularly as a result of your nearly 7 years of experience as an alleged “ United
States Attorney for Illinois”, from 1994 until May 2001.

C. Based on the requirements and/ or statement contained in Article 3, Sec. 21, Article 16,
Sec. 1, Article 16, Sec. 6, 13, and on page 73 of said Illinois constitution, it would
appear that such a similar political Structure does indeed exist in Illinois today. If I am
incorrect in my understanding of what the various differences in said phraseology
mean, did such a political structure ever exist in Illinois, and indeed, what be considered
as bona fide full written disclosure of the entire political structure, including but not
limited to, all such “parallel” political structures, that exist today in Illinois?

D. If the political structure in Illinois today is the same as or similar to that show above
for North Carolina, et al, when did that political structure come into existence?

E. If the political structure in Illinois today is the same or similar to that shown above, are
there parallel offices of other state executive positions such as lieutenant governor,
secretary of state, treasurer, attorney general, etc.?

F. If the political structure in Illinois today is the same or similar to that which is shown
above, do different people occupy the parallel offices or does the same person occupy
both parallel offices? (i.e. Are you, Governor, considered the governor of Illinois as
well as the governor of the State of Illinois, as well as the governor of the state of
Illinois, etc.?)

4. In addition to providing me with the bona fide full written disclosure of the entire political
structure of Illinois, please send me a copy of whatever constitutions, statutes, by-laws,
operating mandates, or general procedures etc., exist to show the specific areas of
responsibility and authority for the State of Illinois, state of Illinois, Illinois, governor of
the State of Illinois, governor of the state of Illinois, governor of Illinois, as well as for
whatever other parallel executive offices exist for the State of Illinois, state of Illinois, and
for Illinois. Also please sent copies such documents for any “Council of State of Illinois”
 [or whatever other name such a “Council” may be known as.] as well as the names of those
people who actually comprise both of such “Councils”.

5. My interest in receiving such a bona fide full written disclosure of the entire political
structure of Illinois, et al, as well as the other documents requested, is made more obvious
by the fact that I, El-Seti: Anu: Ali El, a living Man, experienced an unlawful arrest under
threat, duress, and coercion exerted by an alleged “Highway patrolman” for the STATE
OF ILLINOIS/State of Illinois, allegedly known as JAMES W. BIGELOW, on May 4,
2010, while traveling on Highway 30 in Illinois. If you check the definition of the word
“arrest” in a dictionary such as Webster Dictionary, 1994 ed, ISBN 0-7779-911-3, you will
fine the following “vb 1: STOP, CHECK 2: to take into legal custody. The noun version
says: “n 1: the act of stopping; also; the state of being stopped 2: the taking into custody
by legal authority.” The term “custody” is in the dictionary as: immediate charge and
control”. Said “highway patrolman” Refused To Provide any confirming identification at
my request, and in general, was operating ultra vires, even though I conspicuously made
him aware of the fact of my lawful status as a Living Man rather than a artificial person. I
am

Walt Maken and the two governments of North Carolina