MM Met D19084 RP 012

FACTORY - NISSAN PLASTIC INJECTION WEST
EXPANSION, ORAGADAM.
DOC NO : MM-MET-D19084-RP-012
PROJ NO : MM-MET-D19084
DESIGN REPORT
Client: METEC DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

ENGINEERS INDIA PVT LTD
Submitted by
MARMAG INFRA PVT.LTD.
CHENNAI
PROJECT : FACTORY - NISSAN PLASTIC INJECTION WEST
EXPANSION.
LOCATION : ORAGADAM, CHENNAI
PROJECT NO : MM-MET-D19084
CLIENT : METEC DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS
REPORT VERIFICATION
DOCUMENT NO MM-MET-D19084-RP-012
DESCRIPTION ISSUED FOR REVIEW
REV NO DATE DESCRIPTION ENGG CHECK APPVD
P0 24-10-2019 FIRST DRAFT PKH ASH SKV
P1 05-11-2019 SECOND DRAFT ASH PKH SKV
P2 15-11-2019 THIRD DRAFT ASH PKH SKV
Note: This document takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our
client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no
responsibility is undertaken to any third party.
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 4
2. STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 5
3. CODES AND STANDARDS ................................................................................................ 6
4. STRUCTURAL SYSTEM & METHODOLOGY ................................................................ 7
4.1 Structural System ................................................................................................................... 7
4.2 Material Properties ................................................................................................................. 8
5. LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS ............................................................................. 9
5.1 Dead Load (DL) ................................................................................................................ ..... 9
5.2 Live Load (LL) .................................................................................................................... 10
5.3 Wind Load (WL).................................................................................................................. 10
5.4 Earth Quake Load (EQL) ..................................................................................................... 12
5.5 Crane Load (CL) .................................................................................................................. 12
5.6 Load Combinations .............................................................................................................. 13
6. ANALYSIS & DESIGN ........................................................................................................... 14
6.1 Analysis & design– Strength ............................................................................................... 14
6.2 Bending Moment ................................................................................................................. 15
6.3 Deflection Limits – Limit State of Serviceability ................................................................ 16

METEC DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
CLIENT : PROJ NO : MM- MET-D19084
FACTORY - NISSAN PLASTIC INJECTION
PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
TITLE : DESIGN REPORT DATE : 15-11-2019
1. INTRODUCTION
This document presents the structural design calculations for a Factory - Nissan Plastic Injection
West Expansion as per the relevant codes and standards mentioned in section 3. The plan dimension of
proposed Expansion structure is 15.57 m x 15 m. The scope of the document is to provide the Design
report for the proposed steel building. The steel superstructure is analysed and designed using STAAD
Pro software. The substructure is designed using in house spread sheets. The document describes the
structural layout, loads and load combinations, material properties and methodology used for analysis
and design. The scope of work is to design the superstructure and substructure of proposed expansion
building only.
MARMAG INFRA PVT. LTD., CHENNAI Page 4

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
2. STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION
This section describes the basic structural description and layout of the proposed structure. The
Overall plan dimension of proposed steel building is 15.57 m x 15 m. The Eave height of the structure
is 14.35 m from FFL. The main frame bay spacing of the structure is 15 m for column centre to centre
and gable end frame bay spacing of the structure is 8.57m (Max.).
Table 2.1 Building Description
SL NO DESCRIPTION DETAILS
1 Building Occupancy Warehouse
2 Width (m) 15.57 c/c
3 Length (m) 15.00 c/c
4 Clear height (m) from F.F.L 13.555
5 Roof slope 0.5 in 10 (Mono slope)
6 Wind bracings Roof bracing
7 Roof sheeting 0.5 mm thick Galvalume sheet

0.5 mm thick Galvalume sheet above Retaining
8 Wall cladding
wall
9 Retaing wall height 1m from the F.F.L
10 Canopy 1 No (Existing )
11 Rolling shutter 1 No (Existing )
12 Crane capacity 40 MT
13 Crane Beam(m) 10.338 (Top of crane beam)
14 Soil Bearing capacity 100 kN/m2 @ 2m Below Ground level

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
3. CODES AND STANDARDS
This section lists out the applicable codes and standards for the analysis and design of the proposed
Expansion structure.
1. IS 800: 2007, General Construction in Steel – Code of Practice
2. IS 456: 2000 – Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete
3. IS 875 (part 1) –1987, Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings &
structures –Dead loads
4. IS : 875 ( Part 2 ) – 1987, (Reaffirmed 1997) code of practice for design ads (other than
earthquake) for buildings and structures – Live loads
5. IS: 875 (Part-3)-2015, Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquakes) for buildings
& structures – Wind loads
6. IS: 1893(Part-1) – 2016, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: General
provisions and buildings
7. IS 801: 1975 - Code Of Practice For Use Of Cold-Formed Light Gauge Steel Structural
Members In General Building Construction
8. IS : 811-1987 Specification for Cold formed Light gauge Structural Steel Sections
9. IS: 4923 - 1997, Hollow Steel Sections for structural use- Specification.
10. IS 2062: 2011, Steel for general structural purposes, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
4. STRUCTURAL SYSTEM & METHODOLOGY
4.1 Structural System
STAAD Pro Analysis and design software is used for the analysis and design of the Steel building
superstructure. For the analysis 3D skeleton shall be modelled and analysed by using the STAAD Pro
analysis and design software. The full skeleton model shall be done by using the beam element in
STAAD. Bay spacing, internal columns spacing, height and slope are followed as per the input
drawings and technical specifications submitted by client. The main frame is considered as moment
resisting frame to control the deflection in the same plane.
Fig4.1 – Rendered view of expansion structure, from STAAD Pro
The purlins, girts, foundations, pedestal and other secondary members are designed as per the
relevant codes and standards, using in-house standards and spread-sheets.

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
4.2 Material Properties

The material properties are used for defining the stiffness calculation of the modelled structural
members in the analysis.
Table-4.1 Elastic Properties of Materials
Elastic Unit
Sl. Poisson’s
Material Member description Modulus weight
No. Ratio
(kN/m2) (kN/m3)
Mild steel Built up sections, Base
1 2 2 x 108 0.3 78.5
(fy =250 N/mm ) plates, Bracing etc.
High Strength cold formed Purlin, eave
2 2 2 x 108 0.3 78.5
steel (fy =350 N/mm ) strut etc.
High Strength Footing, Pedestals,
3 deformed bars Plinth Beam, 2 x 108 0.3 78.5

(fy =500 N/ mm2) Retaining wall
Footing, Pedestal,
Concrete
4 Plinth Beam, 25000 0.15 25
2
(fck = 25 N/ / mm )
Retaining wall

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
5. LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS
This section describes the various loads considered for the analysis and design of the Building
mentioned in the scope. The loads and load calculations are described below.
5.1 Dead Load (DL)
Dead load consists of the self-weight of the structure, its connections and other accessories. Dead
loads are considered as per the client specifications.
Table 5.1 Dead load
SL NO ITEMS WEIGHT
Self-weight factor for members including connections

1 1.15
15%)
2 Roofing Sheet 5 kg/m2
3 Wall cladding 5 kg/m2
4 Flange braces, sag rods etc. 10 kg/m2
5 Collateral load 50 kg/m2
7 Floor Finish 1 kN/m2
8 Unit Weight of Masonry Wall 20 kN/m3
9 Unit Weight of Soil 18 kN/m3

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
5.2 Live Load (LL)
Live loads are the gravity loads produced by the use and occupancy of the structure. The roof is
considered as accessible roof that is utilized during the maintenance time alone.
Live load on Roof (Only maintenance) = 75 kg/ m2
5.3 Wind Load (WL)
The loads due to wind are calculated as per the provisions specified in IS 875 (Part-3). Wind load
parameters are given in table 5.2.
Table 5.2 Wind load parameters
Parameters
Regional basic wind speed, Vb 50 m/s
Terrain Category 2
Design life of the building 50 years
Risk Coefficient , K1 1
Terrain, Height and Structure size factor , K2 1.05
Topography factor, K3 1
Importance factor for the cyclonic region, K4 1.15
Wind directionality factor, Kd 1
Area averaging factor, Ka 0.8
Combination factor, Kc 0.9
Percentage of openings in the building <5 %

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
The relationship between wind speed and wind pressure is as follows,
Design Wind Speed Vz = Vb* K1* K2* K3*
K4 Wind pressure is calculated as Pz = 0.6*Vz2;
Design Wind Pressure: Pd = Pz * Kd * Ka * Kc
Pz Pd
Height Vb K1 K2 K3 K4 Kd Ka Kc Vz (kN (kN
(m) (m/s) (m/s)
/m2) /m)
15 50 1 1.05 1 1.15 1 0.8 0.9 60.375 2.187 1.57
The internal pressure coefficients considered, Cpi = +/- 0.2
Table 5.3 External pressure coefficients on Walls, Cpe
Wall
A B C D
0o +0.7 -0.25 -0.6 -0.6
90o -0.6 -0.6 +0.7 -0.25
Table 5.4 External pressure coefficients on Roof, Cpe
Roof
0o 90 o
EF -0.86 EG -0.942
GH -0.6 FH -0.6

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
5.4 Earth Quake Load (EQL)
The loads due to Earthquake are generated by the response of the structure to design spectrum as
specified in IS 1893 (Part 1).The masses considered in the structure, generating the earthquake loads
are due to dead weight of permanent construction, only live loading on the roof of the building is not
considered. The earthquake factors considered are as follows.
Table 5.5 Seismic Load Parameters
PARAMETERS
Zone factor (Zone III) 0.16
Importance Factor 1
Response Reduction factor 4
Damping ratio 0.05
Type of soil Medium soil
5.5 Crane Load (CL)
Capacity 40 MT
Vertical Impact Coefficient 1.25
Lateral Impact Coefficient 0.1
Longitudinal Impact Coefficient 0.05

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
5.6 Load Combinations
The Structural steel building is designed for both strength and serviceability criteria. For the
strength design, load combinations as specified in IS 800- 2007 shall be used. For ascertaining safety
under service load conditions the Factored load combinations as specified in IS 800- 2007shall be
used. Various load combinations as per the partial safety factors given in IS 800- 2007 are listed below
for strength and serviceability criteria.
LOAD COMBINATIONS
STRENGTH DESIGN SERVICEABILITY DESIGN
1. 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL+ 1.05 CL 1. 1.0 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 CL
2. 1.5 DL + 1.05 LL+ 1.5 CL 2. 1.0 DL+ 1.0 EL/WL
3. 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 0.53 CL + 1.2 WL/EL 3. 1 DL + 0.8 LL+ 0.8 CL + 0.8WL
4. 1.2 DL + 1.2 CL + 0.53 LL + 1.2 WL/EL 4. 1 DL + 0.8 LL+ 0.8 CL+ 0.8 EL
5. 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.05 CL + 0.6 WL/EL
6. 1.2 DL + 1.05 LL + 1.2 CL + 0.6 WL/EL
6. 1.5 DL + 1.5 WL / EL
7 0.9 DL + 1.5 WL / EL
Abbreviations; DL=Dead load, LL=Live load, WL= Wind load, EL – Earth quake load
CL =Crane load

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
6. ANALYSIS & DESIGN

The steel building is modelled as 3D skeleton with beam elements of varying section sizes to get an
optimum economy. The frames are provided with fixed supports and wind columns are provided with
pinned supports. The Roof bracings considered as rod sections to provide stability to the building in
the longitudinal direction. The building structure is analysed and designed for the loads mentioned in
section 5. The connection calculations are given in Annexure –A.
The foundations are designed for support reactions of the superstructure which is designed for loads
mentioned above. In addition to the support reactions, the self-weight of the substructure and backfill
is considered. The substructure including foundations and pedestals are modelled in STAAD Pro and
designed using in house validated spread sheets which are attached in Annexure B and C respectively.
The Soil Bearing Capacity is considered as 100kN/m2 at 2m below ground level as per client
specifications. The plinth beams are analysed and designed in STAAD Pro as per relevant codes and
standards. The retaining wall is designed manually, the calculation of which is attached in the
Annexure D.
6.1 Analysis & design– Strength
All section sizes are safe as per the design and the utilisation ratios are as given in the following
figure.
Fig 6.1 – Utility ratio of structure.

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Fig 6.2 – Utility ratio of gantry girder.
6.2 Bending Moment
The static analysis is aimed at providing the stress distributions over the entire structure for static
loads for this DR. The bending moment diagram (BMD) of the structure for the load envelope is
provided below.
Fig 6.3 – BMD for Envelope of structure

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Fig 6.4 – BMD for Envelope of gantry girder
6.3 Deflection Limits – Limit State of Serviceability
The deflection limits shall be considered from IS 800:2007. For columns, the lateral deflection limit
is height/200. For columns at crane level, the lateral deflection limit is height/200. For beams, the
vertical deflection limit is span/180. For gantry girder, the vertical deflection limit is span/750.
Fig 6.5 - Critical Deflection pattern for the structure.

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Maximum lateral displacement for column = 0.343 mm < 14820/200 = 74.1 mm.
Maximum lateral displacement for column at crane level = 0.781 mm < 10000/200 = 50 mm.
Maximum vertical displacement for rafter = 6.633 mm < 15570/180 = 86.5 mm
Maximum relative displacement between rails supporting crane= 9.039 mm < 10 mm
Fig 6.6 - Critical Deflection pattern for gantry girder
Maximum vertical displacement for gantry girder = 5.613 mm < 8570/750= 11.43 mm

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
ANNEXURE – A.
TYPICAL CONNECTION CALCULATIONS

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
BASE PLATE AND ANCHOR BOLTS DESIGN
DESIGN OF BASE PLATE

BP2
Given Data
LOAD CASE No. 217
NODE NO 4
Total axial load at the column base P = 79.5645 kN
Total moment at the column base M = 0.234 KNm
Shear force in -X dirn. 0 kN
Shear force in -Z dirn. -71.626 kN
Total shear in the column base V = 107.44 KN
Depth of the column L' = 1390 mm

Width of the column B' = 350 mm
Base Plate Dimensions
Length of the base plate L = 1650 mm
Width of the base plate B = 400 mm
Number of stiffeners ns = 0
Stiffener height/length hs = 200 mm
Stiffener Thickess ts = 10 mm
Area of Base Plate = 660000 mm2
Thickness of base plate t = 25 mm
Edge distance (from column face to base plate edge) e = 50 mm
Compressive strength of concrete fck = 25 MPa
Yeild strength of Steel fy = 2SSSS50 MPa

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Bearing Pressure
Bearing Pressure due to axial load = P/A x = 0.121 MPa
Maximum beaing pressure due to moment = M/Z y = 0.001 MPa
Total bearing pressure = x + y z = 0.122 MPa
Safe bearing pressure of concrete 0.45 fck = 11.250 MPa
SAFE
Design of plate thickness
* consider a small strip of plate of 1mm width and thickness 't' beyond the face of column(figure 2)
Maximum bending moment on the strip due to moment = 6.092E+04 Nmm

Total bending moment Mext = 6.092E+04 Nmm
Mext < Ze×fy/ϒmo
Ze of plate with stiffener 3
Ze = 4.167.E+04 mm
ϒmo = 1.1
Bending Capacity of the Plate with stiffener = Ze × fy/ϒmo = 1.326.E+07 Nmm
SAFE
Check for weld
Weld thickness for Flange tw,flange = 8 mm
Weld thickness for Web tw,web = 8 mm
Weld Length for Bending Lw,b = 700 mm
Weld Length for shear = 2 × L' Lw,s = 2780 mm
Weld Length for axial load = 2 × Lw,b+Lw,s Lw,a = 4180 mm
3 mm4
Moment of inertia of the base plate = B × t /12 = 5.20833E+05
Distance of weld from centroid of base plate with stiffener = 20 mm
Interface shear stress in weld due to bending moment
Ԏ = 0.085890471 MPa
= M/((L'/2)×Lw,b×tw,flange×0.7)
Area of weld for shear = 0.7 × Lw,s × tw,web Aw,s = 15568 mm2
Area of weld for axial load = 0.7 × Lw,a × tw,web Aw,a = 23408 mm2
Stress due to shear force at column basse = V/Aw,s fv = 6.901336074
stress due to axial load =P/Aw,a fa = 3.399030246 MPa
Resultant stress in weld(bending +axial) = Ԏ + fv = 6.987226545 MPa
2
Resultant stress in weld(shear +axial) = √fv + = 7.692973822 MPa
fa2 Permissible stress = 236.7136104 MPa
SAFE

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
DESIGN OF CONNECTIONS AS LIMIT STATES DESIGN

Reference code IS 800 2007
ANCHOR BOLT FOR BP-2
Given Data
LOAD CASE No. 204
NODE NO 4
Shear force in -Z dirn. 63.542 kN
Total Shear force on the connection V = 95313 N
Total Moment on the connection M = 960 Nm
Tension in Column corresponding to max
T = N
moment 0
Total No of Bolts Provided Ntotal = 16
*The connection is detailed as a moment connection. The connection is designed in such a
way that the flange connections transfer the moment and the web connection resist the
shear.
Lever arm/distance between flange connections z = 1.39 m
Tension on the bolts due to moment = M/z Tb = 690.65 N
Bolt Details
Nominal shank diameter of bolt d mm
= 30
End distance of bolt along bearing direction e mm SAFE
= 50
Pitch distance of bolt along bearing direction p mm SAFE
= 180
Diameter of hole d0 35 mm
=
Yield stress of bolt fyb 240 N/mm2
=
Ultimate tensile stress of bolt fub 400 N/mm2
=
Nominal shank area = πd2 /4 Asb = 706.86 mm2
Net shear area = 0.78 × Asb Anb = 551.35 mm2
Partial safety factors for bolt-bearing λmb 1.25

=
Plate details
2
Yield stress to plate fy = 250 N/mm
Ultimate tensile stress of plate 2
fu 410 N/mm
=
Total thickness of plates experiencing bearing
t 25 mm
in same direction =
Shear Capacity of bolt CL 10.3.3
Number of shear planes nn = 1
Nominal shear capacity of the bolt
Vnsb 127 kN
= fub × nn × Anb /√3 =
Design Shear capacity of one bolt = Vnsb / λmb Vdsb = 101863 N
Actual Shear Force in one bolt = V/Ntotal V = 5957 N
HENCE BOLTS ARE SAFE IN SHEAR
Bearing Capacity of bolt

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
kb = smaller of ( e/(3 × do),(p/(3 × do))-0.25, fub/fu, 1) CL 10.3.4
kb = 0.48
Nominal bearing strength of bolt

= 2.5 × kb × d × t × fu
Vnpb = 357 kN
Nominal bearing area of the bolt on any plate 875 mm2

= t × do
Apb =
Design bearing stress of the bolt/plate = 327 N/mm2
fapb
= Vnpb / (Apb × λmb )
Actual Bearing Stress on the bolt/plate = V/Apb Vpb = 109 N/mm2
HENCE THE CONNECTION IS SAFE IN BEARING OF BOLTS/PLATES
Tensile capacity of bolt CL 10.3.5

Partial safety factors for yeilding or buckling λmo 1.1
=
Design tensile capacity of a bolt = Tnb / λmb Tdb 154223.639 N
=
Number of botls resisting tension due to moment nreq = 2
Actual tension in one bolt due to moment
Tm = 345.323741 N
= Tb /nreq
Actual tension in one bolt due to tension in
Tc = 0 N
column = T/Ntotal
Total tension in one bolt = Tc + Tm T1b = 345.323741 N
HENCE THE BOLTS ARE SAFE IN TENSION
Combined Shear and Tension

V/Vd = 0.06 SAFE
T/Td = 0.002 SAFE
(V/Vd)^2 +(T/Td)^2 = 0.00 SAFE
Weld design for Web Connection

Weld thickness tw 6 mm
=
Weld Capacity/mm length of weld fdw = 795.3577308 N
Length of weld required = V/fdw lwreq = 119.8366424 mm
Length of weld provided lw 400 mm

=
SAFE
Weld design for Flange Connection
Weld thickness tw 8 mm
c
P =0216 x √f x
A e
=
Weld Capacity/mm length of weld fdw 1060.476974 N

= 0.7 × 410 × tw / (√3 × 1.25) =
Length of weld required = Tb /fdw lwreq 0.651261176 mm

=
Length of weld provided lw 2000 mm
Ae = f(Le) =
SAFE

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
End Plate Bending

Length of end plate = 1650 mm
Width of end plate = 400 mm
Thickness of end plate = 25 mm
Maximum Tension acting on the edge bolts T1b = 0.345 kN
Total No of edge Bolts neb 2

=
eob
End distance of outer bolts 50 mm
=
T1b ×
Moment in plate due to tension in the bolts neb × = 0.035 kNm
eob
Plastic Section modulus of End plate with 8mm
= 966851.8519 mm3
thick stiffner
Moment Capacity of end plate with stiffner = 219.739 kNm
SAFE
Single bolt pull out as per ACI 318 14
SAFE
Embedment length of anchor bolt >12*d = 900
(ASCE Anchor Bolt Report Specification)
Plate diameter, dp = 90 mm
2 2
Bearing area =0.866*dp - 1.25*d Abrg = 8.9580816 in2
Compressive strength of concrete , fc = 25 Mpa
Strength reduction factor, Ø = 0.75
Pullout resistance of the single bolt = Øx 8 x Abrg x fc = 1038.098328 kN SAFE

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
DESIGN OF BASE PLATE

BP 3
Given Data
LOAD CASE No. 216
NODE NO 120
Total axial load at the column base P = 75.225 kN
Total moment at the column base M = 0 KNm
Total shear in the column base V = 117.82 KN
Depth of the column L' = 800 mm

Width of the column B' = 350 mm
Base Plate Dimensions
Length of the base plate L = 900 mm
Width of the base plate B = 400 mm
Number of stiffeners ns = 0
Stiffener height/length hs = 200 mm

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Stiffener Thickess ts = 10 mm
Area of Base Plate = 360000 mm2
Thickness of base plate t = 25 mm
Edge distance (from column face to base plate edge) e = 100 mm
Compressive strength of concrete fck = 25 MPa
Yeild strength of Steel fy = 250 MPa
Bearing Pressure
Bearing Pressure due to axial load = P/A x = 0.209 MPa
Maximum beaing pressure due to moment = M/Z y = 0.000 MPa
Total bearing pressure = x + y z = 0.209 MPa
Safe bearing pressure of concrete 0.45 fck = 11.250 MPa
SAFE
Design of plate thickness
* consider a small strip of plate of 1mm width and thickness 't' beyond the face of column(figure 2)
Maximum bending moment on the strip due to moment = 4.179E+05 Nmm

Total bending moment Mext = 4.179E+05 Nmm
Mext < Ze×fy/ϒmo
Ze of plate with stiffener 3
Ze = 4.167.E+04 mm
ϒmo = 1.1
Bending Capacity of the Plate with stiffener = Ze × fy/ϒmo = 9.470.E+06 Nmm
SAFE
Check for weld
Weld thickness for Flange tw,flange = 8 mm
Weld thickness for Web tw,web = 6 mm
Weld Length for Bending Lw,b = 700 mm
Weld Length for shear = 2 × L' Lw,s = 1600 mm
Weld Length for axial load = 2 × Lw,b+Lw,s Lw,a = 3000 mm
3 mm4
Moment of inertia of the base plate = B × t /12 = 5.20833E+05
Distance of weld from centroid of base plate with stiffener = 20 mm
Interface shear stress in weld due to bending moment
Ԏ = 0 MPa
= M/((L'/2)×Lw,b×tw,flange×0.7)
Area of weld for shear = 0.7 × Lw,s × tw,web Aw,s = 6720 mm2
Area of weld for axial load = 0.7 × Lw,a × tw,web Aw,a = 12600 mm2
Stress due to shear force at column basse = V/Aw,s fv = 17.5327381
stress due to axial load =P/Aw,a fa = 5.970238095 MPa
Resultant stress in weld(bending +axial) = Ԏ + fv = 17.5327381 MPa
Resultant stress in weld(shear +axial) = √fv2 + = 18.52135654 MPa
fa2 Permissible stress = 236.7136104 MPa
SAFE

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

ANCHOR BOLT FOR BP3
Given Data
LOAD CASE No. 216
NODE NO. 120
Shear force in -X dirn. 0.0 kN
Total Shear force on the connection V = 117819 N
Tota tension force on the connection T = 0 N
Bolt Details
Nominal shank diameter of bolt
d = 20 mm
End distance of bolt along bearing direction e = 100 mm SAFE
Pitch distance of bolt along bearing direction p = 150 mm SAFE
Diameter of hole d0 = 25 mm
Yield stress of bolt 2
fyb = 240 N/mm
Ultimate tensile stress of bolt 2
fub = 400 N/mm
Nominal shank area = πd2 /4 Asb = 314.16 mm

2
Net shear area = 0.78 × Asb 2

Anb = 245.04 mm
Partial safety factors for bolt-bearing λmb = 1.25

Plate details
Yield strength of plate fy = 250

Ultimate tensile stress of plate 2
fu = 410 N/mm
in same direction t 25 mm
=
Shear Capacity of bolt

Nominal shear capacity of the bolt = fub × nn × Anb
/√3 Vnsb = 57 kN CL 10.3.3
Total number of bolts required = V/Vdsb nreq = 3
Number of bolts provided to resist shear n = 8 SAFE
shear force in one bolt = V/n V1b = 14727.38
HENCE THE BOLTS ARE SAFE IN SHEAR
kb = smaller of ( e/(3 × do),(p/(3 × do))-0.25, fub/fu, 1) CL 10.3.4
kb 0.98
=
Nominal bearing strength of bolt = 2.5 × kb × d × t
× fu Vnpb = 500 kN
Nominal bearing area of the bolt on any plate = t × Apb 625 mm2
PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
do =
Design bearing stress of the bolt/plate 2
= Vnpb / (Apb × λmb ) fapb = 640 N/mm
Total number of bolts required to resist the bearing
nreq = 1
stress = V/(fapb Apb)
Number of botls provided n = 8
Tensile capacity of bolt SAFE
Partial safety factors for yeilding or buckling λmo = 1.1 CL 10.3.5
Design tensile capacity of a bolt Tdb = 68544 N

Actual tension in one bolt due to tension in column
Tc = 0 N
= T/n
Total tension in one bolt T1b = 0 N SAFE

V/Vd = 0.33 SAFE
T/Td = 0.000 SAFE
(V/Vd)^2 +(T/Td)^2 = 0.11 SAFE
tw 6
Weld thickness = mm
Weld Capacity/mm length of weld fdw 795.36 N

=
= 0.7 × 410 × tw / (√3 × 1.25)
lwreq 148.13
Length of weld required = T b /fdw = mm
lw 800.00
Length of weld provided = mm SAFE
Single bolt pull out as per ACI 318 14
SAFE
Embedment length of anchor bolt >12*d = 750
(ASCE Anchor Bolt Report Specification)
Plate diameter, dp = 60 mm
2 2
Bearing area =0.866*dp - 1.25*d Abrg = 3.9813696 in2
Compressive strength of concrete , fc = 25 Mpa
Strength reduction factor, Ø = 0.75
Pullout resistance of the single bolt = Øx 8 x Abrg x fc = 461 kN SAFE

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

CONNECTION JACK BEAM TO COLUMN
Given Data
BEAM NO 11
LOAD CASE No. 202
SECTION 0
Shear force in -Y dirn. 71.592 kN
Shear force in -Z dirn. -0.244 kN
Total Shear force on the connection V = 107388.6 N
T = 0 N
oment
way that the flange connections transfer the moment and the web connection resist the shear.
Lever arm/distance between flange
z = 0.7 m
nnections
527781.4
Tension on the bolts due to moment = M/z Tb = N
29
Bolt Details
Nominal shank diameter of bolt d = 24 mm
N/mm
Yield stress of bolt fyb = 640
N/mm
Ultimate tensile stress of bolt fub = 800

Plate details
N/mm
Yield stress to plate fy = 250
N/mm
Ultimate tensile stress of plate fu = 410
t = 20 mm
same direction
Shear Capacity of bolt CL
10.3.3
Vnsb = 163 kN
fub × nn × Anb /√3

CL
kb = smaller of ( e/(3 × do),(p/(3 × do))-0.25, fub/fu, 1)
10.3.4

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
kb = 0.61
Nominal bearing strength of
Vnpb = 302 kN
bolt/plate 2.5 × kb × d × t × fu
Nominal bearing area of the bolt on any
plate t × do Apb = 540 mm2
Total Design bearing stress of the bolt/plate N/mm
fapb = 4477
Vnpb / (Apb × λmb )
N/mm
Actual Bearing Stress on the bolt/plate = V/Apb Vpb = 199
CL
Tensile capacity of bolt
10.3.5
Partial safety factors for yeilding or buckling λmo = 1.1
Design tensile capacity of a bolt = Tnb / λmb Tdb = 203249 N
Number of bolts resisting tension due to
nreq = 4
oment
Actual tension in one bolt due to moment 131945.3
Tm = N
Tb /nreq 57
Actual tension in one bolt due to tension
Tc = 0 N
in lumn = T/Ntotal
131945.3
Total tension in one bolt = Tc + Tm T1b = N
57

V/Vd = 0.08 SAFE
T/Td = 0.649 SAFE
(V/Vd)^2 +(T/Td)^2 = 0.43 SAFE

Weld thickness tw = 5 mm
662.7981
Weld Capacity/mm length of weld fdw = N
09
162.0231
Length of weld required = V/fdw lwreq = mm
29
Length of weld provided lw = 800 mm
SAFE
P =0216 x √fcx Ae
795.3577
31
.7 × 410 × tw / (√3 × 1.25)
663.5774
Length of weld required = T b /fdw lwreq = mm
17
Ae = f(Le)
SAFE

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

CONNECTION PLUS COLUMN SPLICE
Given Data
BEAM NO 119
LOAD CASE No. 204
SECTION 1
Shear force in -Y dirn. 4.628 kN
Total Shear force on the connection V = 50602.4 N
T = 0 N
oment
way that the flange connections transfer the moment and the web connection resist the shear.
Lever arm/distance between flange
z = 0.5 m
nnections
Tension on the bolts due to moment = M/z Tb = 895098 N
Bolt Details
Nominal shank diameter of bolt d = 27 mm
N/mm
Yield stress of bolt fyb = 640
N/mm
Ultimate tensile stress of bolt fub = 800

Plate details
N/mm
Yield stress to plate fy = 250
N/mm
Ultimate tensile stress of plate fu = 410
t = 20 mm
same direction
Shear Capacity of bolt CL
10.3.3
Vnsb = 206 kN
fub × nn × Anb /√3

CL
kb = smaller of ( e/(3 × do),(p/(3 × do))-0.25, fub/fu, 1)
10.3.4
kb = 0.53

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Nominal bearing strength of

Vnpb = 292 kN
bolt/plate 2.5 × kb × d × t × fu
Nominal bearing area of the bolt on any
plate t × do Apb = 600 mm2
Total Design bearing stress of the bolt/plate N/mm
fapb = 4674
Vnpb / (Apb × λmb )
N/mm
Actual Bearing Stress on the bolt/plate = V/Apb Vpb = 84
CL
Tensile capacity of bolt
10.3.5
Partial safety factors for yeilding or buckling λmo = 1.1
Design tensile capacity of a bolt = Tnb / λmb Tdb = 257238 N
Number of bolts resisting tension due to
nreq = 4
oment
Actual tension in one bolt due to moment
Tm = 223774.5 N
Tb /nreq
Actual tension in one bolt due to tension
Tc = 0 N
in lumn = T/Ntotal
Total tension in one bolt = Tc + Tm T1b = 223774.5 N

V/Vd = 0.03 SAFE
T/Td = 0.870 SAFE
(V/Vd)^2 +(T/Td)^2 = 0.76 SAFE

662.7981
09
76.34668
Length of weld required = V/fdw lwreq = mm
44
SAFE
P =0216 x √fcx Ae
1060.476
97
.7 × 410 × tw / (√3 × 1.25)
844.0522
Length of weld required = T b /fdw lwreq = mm
72

f
ANCHOR
I t'L./\ TE D E.S l6iN
I= X = -66c k.N H x "' 4-3 6 rf) w

t=c Y Cc) 3 t>t y L
= It o lN .,,. / "'I r-J .-,,
l=z = 9 is k_,.J \-,r7

"'-
"<- I I, I::_ I\} YY.J
To
b_,0
= o ·4-S '
= (J ·4:s )<.i,._5
- /1·.;ic, , L'Y)W} 2...

'-"· /Lf-.3 o X/o3
f)-<Q5
"" I;;, ? )
I I· ff 'i'h vr/--
«ale, f'=W:
(iioo,_, <
1-(Goo, oo)-i,
Oxg_s-0)
I + xJx.25ox 6'V
+0 X: ¾- X. Q 'v-D >c. 0.o i)
""" I 'i? .)
- 'f =, s o rnrv:, .2.
-
< ckd_
Jf:e Dk;.
f1,,
"'/, af s..,(o'-o sbJ ><"l\-,,0
't:s - e(' · s' X u:> <= ( "{-3 Cl XI O j
I
Q q=, '5 o -
t.-1..'.l =- 0 · =, ii: o1. N/ ro IY)2.
PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
PLUS COLUMN DESIGN

Project Name: FACTORY - NISSAN PLASTIC INJECTION WEST Project No: MM-MET-
EXPANSION. D19084
Calculation Sheet for members as per Limit State Design by PKH
Referance - code IS 800 2007 & Amend. No.1, by Reprography unit, BIS, New Delhi
Given Data L.Co 104 October 24, 2019
mb.
Applied moment about major axis Mz = 83 kNm STAAD Member
Applied moment about minor axis My = 555 kNm 123
Applied factored axial force - N,P or T P = 1320 kN Node Number
Applied factored shear force along
Vz = 72 kN 1
major axis
Applied factored shear force along
Vy = 18 kN Member Name
minor axis
119&1
Unsupported length about major axis Lz = 15000 mm
23
Unsupported length about minor axis Ly = 1000 mm
Table
Effective length factor about major axis kz = 1.5
11
ky = 1.5
Table
Laterally Unsupported kLT = 1
15
Slenderness Limit λ = 180 Table 3
Yield Strength of the material fy = 250 N/mm2 Table 1
Ultimate strength of the material fu = 410 N/mm2
Young's Modulus E = 200000 N/mm2
Poisson's ratio μ = 0.3
Section Details
Section Name PLUS
Section is Safe
750/350/20/16
Overall depth of the section D = 750 mm
Overall width of the section B = 350 mm
Thickness of flange tf = 20 mm
Thickness of web tw = 16 mm
Z
Cross sectional area of section, Ae or Ax Ax = 50464 mm2
Shear area in z-z axis Az = 25360 mm2
Y
Shear area in y-y axis Ay = 25360 mm2
Moment of inertia about z-z axis Iz = 2.486E+09 mm4
Moment of inertia about y-y axis Iy = 2.486E+09 mm4 Effective width
Section modulus about z-z axis Zez = 6.629E+06 mm3 D' 750
Section modulus about y-y axis Zey = 6.629E+06 mm 3
B' 350
Plastic section modulus about z-z axis Zpz = 8.399E+06 mm 3
Plastic section modulus about y-y axis Zpy = 8.399E+06 mm3 Bz' 350
Torsional Constatnt Ix = 5.650E+06 mm 4
HSS = 3.312E+14 mm6

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Warping constant
Shear Modulus G = 76923 N/mm2
Partial safety factor of material for
λmo = 1.1 Table 5
yielding/buckling
Section Classification
ε = 1.000 Table 2
Outstanding Element (compression
flange)
Maximum limiting value for
13.6ε = 13.60
semicompact section -
Clear width of compression flange b = 167 mm
Corresponding thickness tf = 20 mm
Clear depth to thickness ratio b/tf = 8.35
Plastic/compact
Internal Element (web)

Maximum limiting value for
126ε = 126.00
semicompact section -
Clear depth of internal elements dw = 347
Corresponding thickness tw = 16
dw/t
Clear depth to thickness ratio = 21.69
w
Plastic/compact
Section classification Plastic/compact
Slenderness Check
Radius of gyration about ZZ axis rzz = 222 mm
Radius of gyration about YY axis ryy = 222 mm
Effective length lez = 22500 mm
ley = 1500 mm
λe,zz = 101
Slenderness Ratio
λe,yy = 7
Slenderness Limit = 180 Table 3
Not Slender
Design tensile strength
Design strength due to Yielding of gross
=
section Tdg 11469 kN
Utilization ratio 0.115

Design compressive strength Clause 7.1
Euler's buckling stress

fcc,ZZ = 192 N/mm2 Clause 7.1.2.1
fcc,YY = 43218 N/mm2
Non dimensional effective slenderness λZZ = 1.141

CLIENT : METEC
DESIGN AND PROJ NO : MM- MET-D19084
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS INDIA PVT LTD
REV : P2
PROJECT : FACTORY - NISSAN PLASTIC
INJECTION WEST EXPANSION. DATE : 15-11-2019
TITLE : DESIGN REPORT
ratio 0.076
λYY =
0.34 b Table 7 & 10
Buckling class αzz = 0.49 c
αyy =
Imperfection factor
Constant ΦZZ = 1.311
ΦYY = 0.473
Compressive stress reduction factor χZZ = 0.51

χYY = 1.00
Design compressive stress fcd,ZZ = 116 N/mm2

fcd,ZZ = 227 N/mm2 Ae
Design compressive strength Pd,ZZ = 5863 kN 50464 mm2
Pd,YY = 11469 kN
Utilization ratio 0.225 Safe
Shear Strength Clause 8.4

Shear Buckling Check
Clear depth to thickness ratio of
d/t = 21.69
internal elements
Maximum limiting value for shear
67ε = 67.00
buckling
No Shear Buckling Clause 8.4.2.1
Nominal plastic shear resistance under
Vnz = 3660 kN
pure shear
Increase 33% as per clause 11.1.4 Vny = 3660 kN
Nominal plastic shear resistance under
Vdz = 3328 kN
pure shear
Increase 33% as per clause 11.1.4 Vdy = 3328 kN
Utilization ratio for z-z axis = 0.022 Safe
Utilization ratio for y-y axis = 0.005 Safe
Shear lag effect Clause 8.2.1.5
Width of the flange with outstandabout
z-z axis bo = 167 mm
Length between points of zero
moment about z-z axis Loz = 22500 mm
Loz/2
=
0 1125 mm
No Shear lag
effect
Width of the flange with outstandabout
y-y axis bo = 167 mm

CLIENT : METECDESIGN AND PROJ NO : MM- MET-D19084
REV : P2
22500 mm
Length between points of zero moment
about y-y axis Loy =
1125 mm
Loy/2
0 =
No Shear lag
Clause
effect
8.2
Bending Stength 1.000 Reduced effective moment
in kN as per
βbz = 1.000
9.3.2.1
= 1909 kNm 83
βby
Bending strength about z-z axis Md,zz = 1909 kNm 555
0.043 Safe
Bending strength about y-y axis Md,yy =
Utilization ratio for z-z axis = 0.291 Safe
Utilization ratio for y-y axis =
Clause 9.3
Combined axial force and Bending moment
(Section Strength) 11469 kN
Compression or
Design strength Nd = tension due to
Exact Method 0.115 yielding
= 1.0
Constants n
2.0
α1 =
α2 =
Clause 9.3.1.2
Design reduced flexural strength under combined axial force
1908.95 kNm
and uniaxial moment
Mndz = 1908.95 kNm
Clause 9.3.1
Mndy =
Check for section strength 0.29 Safe
Conservatively following equation may also be considered for combined axial force +
bending
0.45 Safe
Conclusion for checks
Compression = 0.225 Safe
Shear Major = 0.022 Safe
Shear Minor = 0.005 Safe
Bending Major = 0.043 Safe
Bending Minor = 0.291 Safe
Combined Section Strength = 0.449 Safe

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
ANNEXURE – B
FOUNDATION DESIGN

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
DESIGN OF FOUNDATIONS
FOUNDATION DESIGN
REFERENCE IS 456:2000
Project- FACTORY NISSAN PLASTIC INJECTION WEST EXPANSION
Foundation-F1
Length considered for plinth 8.57 m
and kerb wall
WEIGHTS ADDED TO
Fy
REACTIONS
PLINTH BEAM-250X450 48.21 kN
ht of soil above ground level 0.43
Wall Weight- 230X1000 49.28 kN
Total 97.48 kN
CRITICAL LOADS
L/C Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz Vertical
kN kN kN kNm kNm kNm Load
202 -3 1276 -7 -140 11 64 1374.00
215 -3 366 12 150 1 16 464.00
217 46 416 -42 -331 -32 215 514.00
216 -38 449 -5 -72 37 225 547.00
208 -38 1085 -9 -143 38 243 1183.00
217 46 416 -42 -331 -32 215 514.00
Axial Load (unfactored) Pu = 514 kN

Moment in z direction Muz = 215 kNm
Moment in x direction Mux = 331 kNm
Lateral load in z direction Fz = 42 kN
Lateral load in x direction Fx = 46 kN
Eccentricity of footing with pedestal,x Ex = 0 m
Eccentricity of footing with pedestal ,z Ez = 0 m
Bearing pressure of soil q = 100 kN/m2
Depth of foundation D = 2 m
Height of pedestal above ground level h = 0.15 m
Unit weight of soil ɣs = 18 kN/m3
Unit weight of concrete ɣf = 25 kN/m3
Characteristic strength of Concrete fck = 25 N/mm2
Yield strength of Steel fy = 500 N/mm2
Length l = 2 m
Dimensions of pedestal
Breadth b = 1.3 m
Minimum Percentage of steel to be used pt = 0.0012
SIZE OF FOOTING
Length L = 5.6 m

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Breadth B = 5.6 m
Total thickness of foundation t = 0.5 m
Clear cover c = 0.05 m
Bar diameter in short direction ɸx = 16 mm
Bar diameter in long direction ɸz = 16 mm
Effective Depth in short span dx = 0.426 m
Effective depth in long span dy = 0.442 m
Area of foundation A = 31.36 m2
long side = 1.8 m
Projection of footing beyond column face
short side = 2.15 m
NO PULL OUT
Calculations
Unfactored bearing pressure of soil q' = 100 kN/m2
Weight of backfill Wb = 996.534 KN
Weight of footing Wf = 392.000 kN
Weight of pedestal Wp = 107.250 kN
Net Axial Load P = 2009.784 kN
Total factored axial load Pf = 3014.676 kN
Moment due to lateral force in x direction Mx' = 0.000 kNm
Moment due to lateral force in z direction Mz' = 0.000 kNm
Total Moment in x direction Mx' = 331.000 kNm
Total Moment in z direction Mz = 215.000 kNm
PRESSURE CALCULATIONS
Contact length of footing Lc = 5.60 m
Maximum Pressure qmax = 82.742 kN/m2
Minimum Pressure qmin = 45.433 kN/m2
Eccentricity in z ez = 0.107 m
Eccentricity in x ex = 0.165 m
Pressure at critical section for one way shear qd = 73.694 kN/m2
Pressure at the face of the column qf = 70.750 kN/m2
STABILITY AGAINST OVERTURNING
Stabilising Forces
Axial load P = 514 kN
Total stabilising forces Fs = 1902.534 kN
Lever Arm,x x = 2.8 m
Stabilising Moment,z Mr = 5627.4 kNm
Stabilising Moment,x Mr = 5627.4 kNm
Destabilising forces

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

Lever arm for lateral load z = 2.15 m
Tension T = 0 kN
Lever arm, z zt,z = 2.8 m
Lever arm, x zt,x 2.8
Destabilising moment Mo,z = 215.000 kNm
Destabilising moment Mo,x = 331.000 kNm
factor of Safety against overturning Fs = 15.301
SAFE AGAINST
OVERTURNING
STABILITY AGAINST SLIDING

Stabilising Force
Frictional Coefficient µ = 0.5
Resultant soil pressure acting on the footing
base R = 2009.784 kN
R=net axial load
Destabilising force
Maximum Lateral force Fz/Fx = 46 kN
Factor of safety against sliding Fs = 19.7
SAFE AGAINST SLIDING
ONE WAY SHEAR

Shear stress of section Ʈc = 290 kN/m2
Shear force Vu1 = 441.666 kN
Shear strength of the section Vc1 = 691.824 kN
TWO WAY SHEAR
Ratio of short side to long side of pedestal β = 0.650
0.5+β ks = 1.000
Shear stress of concrete Ʈ = 1250.000 kN/m2
Actual shear force Vu2 = 3364.205 kN
Shear resistance of the section Vc2 = 4421.88 kN
SAFE
FLEXURAL REINFORCEMENT CALCULATIONS
Long direction
Bending moment in long direction Md' = 534.039 kNm
Effective depth in long direction d' = 0.442 m
M/bd2 R = 0.488
Required percentage of reinforcement pt,reqd = 0.115 %

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Required area of reinforcement Ast,reqd = 2843.04 mm2

Area of reinforcement Ast = 3360 mm2
Spacing of reinforcement required s,reqd = 335 mm
Spacing of reinforcement provided s,provd = 125 mm
SAFE
Short direction
Bending moment in short direction Md" = 761.912 kNm
Effective depth in short direction d = 0.426 m
M/bd2 R = 0.750
Area of reinforcement Ast = 710.590 mm2
SAFE
Top Reinforcement
Long & Short Direction

Diameter of bar for top reinforcement ɸz = 16 mm
Load considered per metre for hogging
Wt = -23.10 kN/m
moment
Bending Moment Mt = 135.83 kNm
M/bd2 R = 0.124
SAFE
Development required Ld = 777 mm

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
FOUNDATION DESIGN
Foundation-F2
and kerb wall
WEIGHTS ADDED TO
Fy
REACTIONS
Total 97.48 kN
CRITICAL LOADS
202 -1 1004 -26 45 20 2 1102.00
217 1 124 -6 -74 -1 1 222.00
201 1 474 -15 -115 -1 1 572.00
208 -9 819 -63 -288 10 14 917.00
208 -9 819 -63 -288 10 14 917.00
217 -4 181 -63 -531 1 3 279.00

Length l = 2 m
Breadth b = 0.8 m
SIZE OF FOOTING
Length L = 5 m
Breadth B = 5 m

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

Area of foundation A = 25 m2
long side = 1.5 m
short side = 2.1 m
NO PULL OUT
Calculations
Stabilising Forces

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

Tension T = 0 kN
SAFE AGAINST
OVERTURNING

Stabilising Force
base R = 1476.500 kN
R=net axial load
Destabilising force
ONE WAY SHEAR

TWO WAY SHEAR
0.5+β ks = 0.900
SAFE
Long direction
M/bd2 R = 0.277

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

SAFE
Short direction
M/bd2 R = 0.580
SAFE
Top Reinforcement

Wt = -25.97 kN/m
moment
M/bd2 R = 0.101
SAFE

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
FOUNDATION DESIGN
Foundation-F3
and kerb wall
WEIGHTS ADDED TO
Fy
REACTIONS
Total 85.31 kN
CRITICAL LOADS
202 0 268 -1 0 0 0 354.00
217 0 -33 1 0 0 0 53.00
217 46 106 -4 0 0 0 192.00
216 -52 107 -4 0 0 0 193.00
202 0 268 -1 0 0 0 354.00
202 0 268 -1 0 0 0 354.00

Length l = 1.21 m
Breadth b = 0.5 m
SIZE OF FOOTING
Length L = 3 m
Breadth B = 3 m

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

Area of foundation A = 9 m2
long side = 0.895 m
short side = 1.25 m
NO PULL OUT
Calculations
Stabilising Forces

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

Tension T = 0 kN
SAFE AGAINST
OVERTURNING

Stabilising Force
base R = 770.590 kN
R=net axial load
Destabilising force
ONE WAY SHEAR

TWO WAY SHEAR
0.5+β ks = 0.913
SAFE
Long direction
M/bd2 R = 0.480

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

SAFE
Short direction
M/bd2 R = 1.035
SAFE
Top Reinforcement

Wt = 14.13 kN/m
moment
M/bd2 R = 0.134
SAFE

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
FOUNDATION DESIGN
Foundation-F4
and kerb wall
WEIGHTS ADDED TO
Fy
REACTIONS
Total 97.48 kN
CRITICAL LOADS
202 -3 1276 -7 -140 11 64 1374.00
215 -3 366 12 150 1 16 464.00
217 46 416 -42 -331 -32 215 514.00
216 -38 449 -5 -72 37 225 547.00
208 -38 1085 -9 -143 38 243 1183.00
217 46 416 -42 -331 -32 215 514.00

Eccentricity of footing with pedestal ,z Ez = -0.3 m
Length l = 2 m
Breadth b = 1.3 m
SIZE OF FOOTING
Length L = 6.7 m
Breadth B = 5 m

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

long side = 2.35 m
short side = 1.85 m
NO PULL OUT
Calculations
Moment due to eccentricity of pedestal, x PEx = 0.000 kNm
Moment due to eccentricity of pedestal, z PEz = -439.500 kNm
Total Moment in x direction Mx' = -299.500 kNm
Eccentricity in x ex = -0.099 m
Stabilising Forces

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

Tension T = 0 kN
Destabilising moment Mo,x = -299.500 kNm
factor of Safety against overturning Fs = -22.724
SAFE AGAINST
OVERTURNING

Stabilising Force
base R = 3024.760 kN
R=net axial load
Destabilising force
ONE WAY SHEAR

TWO WAY SHEAR
0.5+β ks = 1.000
SAFE
Long direction
M/bd2 R = 0.364

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

SAFE
Short direction
M/bd2 R = 0.237
SAFE
Top Reinforcement

Wt = 12.75 kN/m
moment
M/bd2 R = 0.045
SAFE

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
FOUNDATION DESIGN
Foundation-F5
and kerb wall
WEIGHTS ADDED TO
Fy
REACTIONS
Total 97.48 kN
CRITICAL LOADS
202 -1 1004 -26 45 20 1865 1102.00
217 1 124 -6 -74 -1 230 222.00
201 1 474 -15 -115 -1 882 572.00
208 -9 819 -63 -288 10 1510 917.00
217 1 124 -6 -74 -1 230 222.00
202 -1 1004 -26 45 20 1865 1102.00

Eccentricity of footing with pedestal,x Ex = -2.75 m
Length l = 1.8 m
Breadth b = 0.75 m
SIZE OF FOOTING
Length L = 7.3 m
Breadth B = 7.3 m

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

long side = 5.5 m
short side = 3.275 m
NO PULL OUT
Calculations
Moment due to eccentricity of pedestal, x PEx = -3230.047 kNm
Moment due to eccentricity of pedestal, z PEz = 0.000 kNm
Total Moment in z direction Mz = -1365.047 kNm
Eccentricity in z ez = -0.367 m
Stabilising Forces

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

Tension T = 0 kN
Destabilising moment Mo,z = -1365.047 kNm
factor of Safety against overturning Fs = -11.023
SAFE AGAINST
OVERTURNING

Stabilising Force
base R = 3714.429 kN
R=net axial load
Destabilising force
ONE WAY SHEAR

TWO WAY SHEAR
0.5+β ks = 0.917
SAFE
Long direction
M/bd2 R = 0.868

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

SAFE
Short direction
Moment resistance of the section Mu = 1699.560 kNm
M/bd2 R = 0.322
SAFE
Top Reinforcement
Longer & & Shorter Direction

Wt = -9.05 kN/m
moment
Effective depth d' = 0.692 m
M/bd2 R = 0.002
SAFE

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
ANNEXURE – B
PEDESTAL DESIGN

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
DESIGN OF PEDESTALS
FACTORY NISSAN PLASTIC INJECTION

Project Name:
WEST EXPANSION
Client Name: METEC
Project No: D19084 Date: 05-11-2019
DESIGN OF RCC COLUMNS AS PER IS 456:2000, SP 16-1980 & IS 13920:1993
INPUTS
COLUMN ID. P1 OUTPUTS
.
Type of forces selected are Section forces from the column modelled in STAAD Pro
CRITICAL SECTION FORCES

Axial
Load Beam Shear -Y Shear-Z Moment- Moment-
Critical Forces Load
Case No. (kN) (kN) Y (kNm) Z (kNm)
(kN)
Max Axial load 104 130 1935.784 4.927 9.667 195.924 -101.543
Max Shear-Y 131 130 669.4018 -68.276 62.263 495.495 322.398
Max Shear-Z 128 126 1476.176 22.056 69.894 544.668 -175.116
Moment-Y 138 128 386.2048 -29.977 67.32 704.324 138.963
Moment-Z 118 130 1489.815 59.416 13.633 181.564 -378.884
Min Axial Load 137 130 121.8238 -5.784 24.519 150.238 -3.713
Any Additional loads due to any member not modelled in STAAD Pro.
Axial
Shear-Y Shear-Z Moment- Moment-Z
Item Load
(kN) (kN) Y (kNm) (kNm)
(kN)
Plinth beam 0 0 0 0 0
The column has equal reinforcement on all 4 sides
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Characteristic Strength of concrete,fck = 25 N/mm2
Characteristic strength of steel rebars, fy = 500 N/mm2
Characteristic strength of stirrups, fy = 415 N/mm2
Exposure Condition Moderate

Clear Cover 40 mm Cover OK
Support Condition in respect of minor axis One end fixed, other end pinned
Support Condition in respect of major axis One end fixed, other end pinned
SECTION PROPERTIES

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Cross-section of the column Rectangle

Unsupported length of the column = 3500 mm
Width of the column, b = 1300 mm
Depth of the column, D = 2000 mm
Main Longitudinal reinforcement dia = 20 mm
Dia of lateral ties = 8 mm
The column is pedestal since effective length/least lateral dimension

is less than 3
Section Properties of all RC beams connected to the column

Beams in X direction of STAAD Beams in Z direction of STAAD
Eff. Eff.
Breadth Depth Breadth Depth
Sl.No. Cover Sl.No. Cover
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm) (mm)
1 250 45 25 1 250 450 25
2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Calculation for Min Axial Load
Effective length & Eccentricities

Effective length factor in respect of minor axis = 0.8
Effective length factor in respect of major axis = 0.8
Effective length of the column,in minor axis,ley = 2800 mm
Effective length of the column,in major axis, lez = 2800 mm
Minimum eccentricity along minor axis, eymin = 73.67 mm
Minimum eccentricity along major axis,ezmin = 50.34 mm
Actual eccentricity along minor axis, ey = 30.48 mm
Actual eccentricity along major axis, ez = 1233.25 mm
Actual eccentricities are less than minimum eccentricities. Hence moments due to eccentricity are
considered about their corresponding direction.
Load Calculations
Axial load, Pu = 121.82375 kN
Moment about minor axis, My = 150.238 kNm
Moment about major axis, Mz = 8.975 kNm
Moment about minor axis due to lateral load, My' = 0 kNm
Moment about major axis due to lateral load, Mz' = 0 kNm
Moment due to buckling of column-minor axis,May = 0 kNm

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Moment due to buckling of column-major axis,Maz = 0 kNm

Total Moment about minor axis, Muy = 150.238 kNm
Total Moment about major axis, Muz = 8.975 kNm
Resultant moment, Mu = 174 kNm
d'/D = 0.05
Pu/fckbD = 0.02
Mu/fckbD2 = 0.01
p/fck = 0
Percentage of reinforcement required = 0.15 %

Area of longitudinal reinforcement required = 3900 mm2
Total number of longitudinal bars required = 14 Nos.
Total number of longitudinal bars provided = 28 Nos. OK
Check for Section Capacity

d'/D = 0.05
Pu/fckbD = 0.02
p/fck = 0.01
Muz1/fckbD2 = 0.03
Moment capacity about major axis, Muz1 = 3900 kNm
d'/B = 0.05
Muy1/fckDb2 = 0.03
Moment capacity about major axis, Muy1 = 2535 kNm
Axial load capacity, Puz = 31888.94 kN
Pu/Puz = 0.01
SAFE: Axial load capacity of the column section is OK
Load contour exponent, αn = 1
α
+
α
= 0.07 < =1 OK
(/1)^ (/1)^
SAFE: Moment capacity of the column section is OK
Check for Shear and Transverse Reinforcement

1.4∗(^ ,_ +
in Y direction = 0.14 kN
^ ,_ )/ℎ_
1.4∗(^ ,_ + in Z direction = 60.34 kN

^ ,_ )/ℎ_

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
As per IS 13920:1993, clause 7.3.4, The design shear force for columns shall be the
MAX( Shear-Y, Shear-Z, FY, FZ)
Shear -Y = 5.784 kN
Shear -Z = 24.519 kN
Design shear force = 60.34 kN
Nominal Shear stress, τ,v = 0.03 N/mm2 OK
Design shear strength of concrete, τ,c = 0.42 N/mm2
Spacing required for lateral ties = 150 mm
Provide 28 number of 20 mm dia longitudinal bars

Provide 8 mm dia lateral ties at 150 mm centre to centre spacing

Project Name:
WEST EXPANSION
Client Name: METEC
INPUTS
.

Axial
Load Beam Shear - Shear-Z Moment- Moment-Z
Case No. Y (kN) (kN) Y (kNm) (kNm)
(kN)
1529.35
Max Axial load 104 131 38.874 -0.222 -2.047 69.002
5
197.582 173.53
Max Shear-Y 138 132 -3.707 0.766 -1352.526
8 5
350.444
Max Shear-Z 130 131 73.927 -12.402 -18.907 -516.29
8
228.014
Moment-Y 133 132 -1.623 -10.067 26.206 -6.841
8
197.582 173.53
Moment-Z 138 132 -3.707 0.766 -1352.526
8 5
Min Axial Load 137 131 4.97575 6.67 0.001 0.076 -82.896
MATERIAL PROPERTIES

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

Support Condition in respect of minor axis One end fixed other end roller
Support Condition in respect of major axis One end fixed other end roller
SECTION PROPERTIES
The column is short column since effective length/least lateral dimension

is less than 12

Eff.
Breadth Depth Breadth Depth Eff. Cover
Sl.No. Cover Sl.No.
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
1 250 450 25 1 250 450 25
2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Calculation for Min Axial Load


PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Load Calculations
d'/D = 0.05
Pu/fckbD = 0.02
Mu/fckbD2 = 0.01
p/fck = 0


d'/D = 0.05
Pu/fckbD = 0.02
p/fck = 0.03
2
Muz1/fckbD = 0.065
Moment capacity about major axis, Muz1 = 5200 kNm
d'/B = 0.1
Muy1/fckDb2 = 0.06
Moment capacity about major axis, Muy1 = 1920 kNm
Pu/Puz = 0.01
α + α = 0.02 < =1 OK
(/1)^ (/1)^

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

`1.4∗(^ ,_ +
^ ,_ )/ℎ_
1.4∗(^ ,_ +
in Z direction = 60.34 kN
^ ,_ )/ℎ_
Shear -Y = 6.67 kN
Shear -Z = 0.001 kN
2
Design shear strength of concrete, τ,c = 0.61 N/mm


Project Name:
WEST EXPANSION
Client Name: METEC
INPUTS
.

Axial
Load Beam Shear - Shear-Z Moment- Moment-Z
Case No. Y (kN) (kN) Y (kNm) (kNm)
(kN)
399.09
Max Axial load 103 127 0 0.253 0 0
8
Max Shear-Y 136 129 98.012 77.344 3.432 0 0
163.37
Max Shear-Z 104 129 -0.228 6.5 0 0
3
Moment-Y 104 129 105.76 -0.228 6.5 -22.749 -0.8
Moment-Z 136 129 63.444 77.344 3.432 -12.011 270.704
Min Axial Load 137 127 -183.92 0 -0.161 0.564 0

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES

SECTION PROPERTIES

is less than 12

Eff.
Breadth Depth Breadt Depth Eff. Cover
Sl.No. Cover Sl.No.
(mm) (mm) h (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
1 250 450 25 1 250 450 25
2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Calculation for Moment-Z


PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

Actual eccentricities are more than minimum eccentricities. Hence actual moments are considered.
Load Calculations
d'/D = 0.05
Pu/fckbD = 0.02
2
Mu/fckbD = 0.02
p/fck = 0


d'/D = 0.05
Pu/fckbD = 0.02
p/fck = 0.03
2
Muz1/fckbD = 0.065
Moment capacity about major axis, Muz1 = 1189.59 kNm
d'/B = 0.1
Muy1/fckDb2 = 0.06
Moment capacity about major axis, Muy1 = 453.75 kNm
Pu/Puz = 0.01

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
α + α = 0.26 < =1 OK
(/1)^ (/1)^

1.4∗(^ ,_ +
^ ,_ )/ℎ_
1.4∗(^ ,_ +
^ ,_ )/ℎ_ in Z direction = 60.34 kN
Shear -Y = 77.344 kN
Shear -Z = 3.432 kN
2
Design shear strength of concrete, τ,c = 0.61 N/mm


Project Name:
WEST EXPANSION
Client Name: METEC
INPUTS
OUTPUT
COLUMN ID. P4
S
.

Axial
Load Beam Shear - Shear-Z Moment Moment-Z
Case No. Y (kN) (kN) -Y (kNm) (kNm)
(kN)
1529.35
Max Axial load 104 131 38.874 -0.222 -2.047 -328.630235
5

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
197.582 173.53
Max Shear-Y 138 132 -3.707 0.766 -1403.897515
8 5
350.444
Max Shear-Z 130 131 73.927 -12.402 -18.907 -607.405635
8
228.014
Moment-Y 133 132 -1.623 -10.067 26.206 -66.124835
8
335.145 172.77
Moment-Z 132 132 -7.101 -1.702 -1437.959895
8 4
Min Axial Load 137 131 4.97575 6.67 0.001 0.076 -84.189695
MATERIAL PROPERTIES

SECTION PROPERTIES

is less than 12

Eff. Breadt Eff.
Breadth Depth h Depth Cove
Sl.No. Cover Sl.No. r
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm) (mm)
1 250 450 25 1 250 450 25
2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Calculation for Moment-Z

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.

Minimum eccentricity along minor axis, eymin = 67 mm
Minimum eccentricity along major axis,ezmin = 32 mm
Load Calculations
d'/D = 0.05
Pu/fckbD = 0.02
2
Mu/fckbD = 0.03
p/fck = 0.01


d'/D = 0.05
Pu/fckbD = 0.02
p/fck = 0.03

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Muz1/fckbD2 = 0.065
Moment capacity about major axis, Muz1 = 3948.75 kNm
d'/B = 0.1
Muy1/fckDb2 = 0.06
Moment capacity about major axis, Muy1 = 1518.75 kNm
Pu/Puz = 0.02
α + α = 0.38 < =1 OK
(/1)^ (/1)^

1.4∗(^ ,_ +
^ ,_ )/ℎ_
1.4∗(^ ,_ +
^ ,_ )/ℎ_ in Z direction = 60.34 kN
Shear -Y = 172.774 kN
Shear -Z = 7.101 kN
Design shear strength of concrete, τ,c = 0.62 N/mm2


PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
ANNEXURE – D
RETAINING WALL DESIGN

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
ANNEXURE – E.
GRADE SLAB DESIGN CALCULATIONS

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE ANALYSIS

For Slab Subjected to Stationary Uniformly Distributed Live Loads
Job Name: FACTORY-NISSAN PLASTIC EXPANSION Client: METEC DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
Job Number: MM-MET-D19084
Input Data:
*Aisle Width
Slab Thickness, t = 8.000 in. w LL w LL
Concrete Strength, f 'c = 3500 psi Top/Slab
Subgrade Modulus, k = 100 pci
Factor of Safety, FS = 2.000
t
Uniform Live Load, wLL = 500.00 psf
(Subgrade)
Concrete Slab on Grade with Uniform Loads
*Note: in an unjointed aislew ay betw een uniformly distributed load areas,

negative bending moment in slab may be up to tw ice as great as
positive moment in slab beneath loaded area. Allow able uniform
load determined below is based on critical aisle w idth and as a
result, there are no restrictions on load layout configuration or
uniformity of loading.
Results:
Design Parameters:
Modulus of Rupture, MR = 532.45 psi MR = 9*SQRT(f 'c)
Allow. Bending Stress, Fb = 266.22 psi Fb = MR/FS
Modulus of Elasticity, Ec = 3372165 Ec = 57000*SQRT(f 'c)
Poisson's Ratio,  = 0.15  = 0.15 (assumed for concrete)
Radius of Stiffness, Lr = 34.83 in. Lr = (Ec*t^3/(12*(1-^2)*k))^0.25
Critical Aisle Width, Wcr = 6.41 ft. Wcr = (2.209*Lr)/12
Stationary Uniformly Distributed Live Loads:

wLL(allow) = 1057.42 psf wLL(allow ) = 257.876*Fb*SQRT(k*t/Ec)
wLL(allow) >= wLL, O.K.
Reference:
1. "Concrete Floor Slabs on Grade Subjected to Heavy Loads"
Army Technical Manual TM 5-809-12, Air Force Manual AFM 88-3, Chapter 15 (1987)
2. "Slab Thickness Design for Industrial Concrete Floors on Grade"
(IS195.01D) by Robert G. Packard (Portland Cement Association, 1976)
Comments:
1. Minimum Reinforcement is provided for the grade slab is to account for shrinkage and temperature
stresses Provided 12ϕ bars at 200 mm c/c
Minimum Reinforcement required = 0.12% of gross area =(0.12 x 1000 x 200)/100 =240
mm ² Reinforcement provided = ((¶/4) x 12² x 1000)/200 =565.5 mm²
Therefore, reinforcement provided is greater than reinforcement required, Hence O.K.
2. Assumed uniform live load =20kN/m²

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
ANNEXURE – F.
PLINTH BEAM DESIGN CALCULATIONS

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
PLINTH BEAM DESIGN

Project Name: FACTORY-NISSAN EXPANSION
Client Name: METEC DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTUION
DESIGN OF RECTANGULAR BEAM AS PER IS 456:2000, SP 16-1980, SP 34-1987 & IS 13920-1993
INPUTS
BEAM ID. PB

Maximum Positive Bending Moment (kNm) = 32.313 kNm
Maximum Negative Bending Moment (kNm) = 64.597 kNm
Maximum Torsion (kNm) = 0 kNm
Maximum Shear force (kN) = 37.835 kN
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
28 days cube Strength of concrete,fck = 25 N/mm2

SECTION PROPERTIES
Type of Beam Continuous
Length of the beam, L = 9675 mm
Breadth of the beam, b = 230 mm
Overall Depth of the beam, D = 300 mm
Calculations
Effective depth of beam, d = 262 mm
xu,max/d = 0.46
Limiting Moment of resistance, Mu,lim = 52890202 Nmm
Equivalent torsional Moment, Mt = 0 Nmm
Design of Mid Section

Equivalent BM on tension face, Me1 = 32313000 Nmm
Equivalent BM on compression face, Me2 = 0 Nmm
Type of section Singly Reinforced Section
BM on tension face, Mu1 = 32313000 Nmm
BM on compression face, Mu2 = 0 Nmm

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Mu/bd2 for tension face = 2.05

2
Mu/bd for compression face = 0
Area of reinforcement required at bottom, Ast,mid = 320 mm2 OK
Area of reinforcement required at top, Asc,mid = 175 mm2 OK
Provide 16 dia 4 numbers of bar in bottom layer for tension

Provide 16 dia 2 numbers of bar in top layer for compression
Design of End Section - upto L/4 from face of supports

Equivalent BM on tension face, Me1 = 64597000 Nmm
Equivalent BM on compression face, Me2 = 0 Nmm
Type of section Doubly Reinforced Section
BM on tension face, Mu1 = 52890202 Nmm
BM on compression face, Mu2 = 11706798 Nmm
Mu/bd2 for tension face = 3.35
2
Mu/bd for compression face = 0
Area of reinforcement required at top, Ast,end = 700 mm2 OK
Area of reinforcement required at bottom, Asc,end = 350 mm2 OK
numbers of bar in bottom layer for

Provide 16 dia 2 compression
Provide 16 dia 4 numbers of bar in top layer for tension
Side Face Reinforcement

Since overall depth of beam is 300mm (<450mm), side face reinforcement is
not required
Shear Reinforcement
Equivalent Shear, Ve = 37835 N
Nominal Shear stress, τ,v = 0.628 N/mm2
Design shear strength of concrete, τ,c = 0.74 N/mm2 OK
Shear stirrups spacing required, sv = 196.5 mm
Provide 8 dia 2 legged vertical stirrups @ 150 mm c/c OK

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
ANNEXURE – G.
PURLIN DESIGN CALCULATIONS

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
PURLIN DESIGN
DESIGN CALCULATION OF Z-PURLIN

Job
Project: MM-MET-D19084 No: MM-MET-D19084
Client: METEC DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION Date : 15-11-2019
INPUT DATA :
PURLIN GEOMETRY
Span of the purlin = 7.500 m
Spacing of the purlin = 1 m
No. of Sag rods = 3
Slope of the Roof = 5.71 deg.
Number of Spans = 2
Bending Moment Coefficients: Use 8 for Single/Two spans,

10 for 3 or more spans
(considering continous span
Bending Moment Coefficient for Mxx(BMCX) = 8 -3)
For Bending About Minor Axis, Number of spans= number of
spans x (number of sagrods+1)
Number of Spans about Minor Axis = 8
(considering
Bending Moment Coefficient for Myy(BMCY) = 8 continous span-3)
Cross Sectional Area of Purlin = 7.80 cm2

Purlin Weight = 6.140 kg/m
= 6.140 kg/sqm
PRIMARY LOAD CASES :
DEAD LOAD
Weight of Sheeting = 5.000 kg/sqm

Self Weight of Purlin (calculated above) = 6.140 kg/sqm
Extra load for weight 10% of purlin weight Other Dead = 0.614 kg/sqm
Loads = 15.000 kg/sqm
=
Total Dead Load 26.754 kg/sqm
= 0.262 kN/sqm
LIVE LOAD

CLIENT : METEC
REV : P2
= 75 kg/sqm
Live load on Roof = 0 kg/sqm
Additional Live Loads to be considered
75 kg/sqm
Total Live Load = 0.735 kN/sqm
WIND LOAD
Vb 50 m/s
k1 1
k3 1
k4 1.15 Based on the data, k2 is obtained from
the tables
k2 1.05 = 2
Terrain Category = 15.625 m
Maximum Horizontal Dimension of Building = A
15.625 m
Hence, Building Class is Height of Top
= 60.375 m/s
2187.0
Design Wind Speed Vz=k1.k2.k3.k4.Vb = 8438 N/sqm
Wind Pressure at height z, pz=0.6Vz^2
Kd 1
Ka 0.8
Kc 0.9
1574.7
Design Wind Pressure pd=pz*Kd*Ka*Kc = 01 N/sqm
= 1.575 kN/sqm
Ht of building at eaves level, h = 15.625 m
Width of the building, w = 15 m
Length of the Building, l = 15 m
Hence, h/w = 1.042
and l/w = 1.000
Based on the h/w and l/w, the values of Cpe is obtained from
tables as noted below:
Maximum Downward Coefficient/Minimum upward coefficient = -0.6 table-5
Maximum Upward Coefficient/Minimum downward coefficient = -0.930 table-5
clause-
Based on % of openings, Cpi is taken as +/- 0.2 6.2.3.2
Wind Load is included in two load combinations –(DL+WL) and

(DL+LL+WL)
Since, Dead Load and Live Load are downward, DL+WL will be critical
for the maximum upward wind force
Similarly, DL+LL+WL will be critical for the maximum downward wind
force

CLIENT : METEC
REV : P2
WL1: Maximum Upward Wind Force – To be used in combination

DL+WL1
= -0.930
Maximum Upward Cpe (including sign) = 0.2
Cpi to use (for upward, use +)
= -1.130
Hence, Cpe-Cpi =
= 1.575 kN/sqm
Design Wind Pressure pz
= -1.779 kN/sqm
Wind pressure for Purlin Design
WL2: Maximum Downward Wind Force – To be used in

combination DL+LL+WL2
Maximum Downward Cpe (including sign) = -0.6
Cpi to use (for upward, use -) = -0.2
(if Cpe-Cpi is not a +ve value,

conservatively Hence, Cpe-Cpi = will take equal to zero) = 0
Design Wind Pressure pz = 1.575 kN/sqm
Wind pressure for Purlin Design = 0.000 kN/sqm
Primary Load Cases – Conversion of forces to Normal And

Tangential Components
Spacing of the purlin = 1 m

Slope of the Roof = 5.71 degrees
Total Dead Load = 0.262 kN/sqm
DL Normal Component = DL x Spacing x cos(slope) = 0.261 kN/m

DL Tangential Component = DL x Spacing x sin(slope) = 0.026 kN/m
Total Live Load = 0.735 kN/sqm
LL Normal Component = LL x Spacing x cos(slope) = 0.731 kN/m

LL Tangential Component = LL x Spacing x sin(slope) = 0.073 kN/m
Total Upward Wind Load in WL1 = -1.779 kN/sqm
WL is normal to roof
Hence, WL1 normal component = WL1 x Spacing = -1.779 kN/m
And, WL1 Tangential component = 0 kN/m
Total Downward Wind Load in WL2 = 0.000 kN/sqm

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
WL is normal to roof
Hence, WL2 normal component = WL2 x Spacing = 0.000 kN/m
And, WL2 Tangential component = 0 kN/m
Design Calculations:Summary of Loads in Load Combinations

From above calculations, the components of load in the various
load combinations are tabulated
DL+LL+WL
DL+LL DL+WL1 2
Normal Load 0.992 -1.519 0.992 kN/m
Tangential Load 0.099 0.026 0.099 kN/m
For Strength Design, 0.75 factor is applicable for combinations with Wind Load since
33.33% extra stress is allowed
Hence, the components of load in the various load combinations for Strength
design are
0.75(DL+W 0.75(DL+LL
DL+LL L1) +WL2)
Normal Load 0.992 -1.139 0.744 kN/m
SECTIONAL PROPERTIES:
Section Name Z 200X60X20X2.3
Yield stress of material = 3450 kg/sqcm

Flange Width, b = 60 mm
Depth of section d = 200 mm
Thickness t = 2.3 mm
Length of Lip lip_l = 20 mm
Internal Bending radius = 3 mm
Total bending Radius, rad = 5.3 mm
Flange Width w/o bend, w = b – 2 x rad = 49.4 mm
2
Area = 7.80 cm
3
Zxx = 45.30 cm
3
Zyy = 9.22 cm
4
Ixx = 453.00 cm
4
Iyy = 54.30 cm
CHECK FOR SECTION PROPERTIES

Basic Section Properties is checked for lip of the purlin based
on IS 801 Clause 5.2.2.1.
Minimum Depth of Lip shall be 2.8 x t x ((w/t)^2-
281200/Fy)^(1/6) and not less than 4.8t

CLIENT : METEC DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROJ NO : MM- MET-D19084
PROJECT : FACTORY - NISSAN PLASTIC INJECTION REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
t= = 2.3 mm
w= = 49.4 mm
Fy= = 3450 kg/sqcm
w/t= = 21.478
2.8 x t x ((w/t)^2-
dmin= 281200/Fy)^(1/6) = 17.331 mm
4.8t= = 11.04 mm
Lip l= = 20 mm Hence OK
Lip is Edge stiffener only if
w/t<60
Here, w/t = =21.48 Hence OK
HENCE OK
CHECK FOR STRESS RATIO:
Check for w/t, lim = 1435/sqrt(f),for fully effective section

As per clause 5.2.1.1 of IS 801,f is the actual stress in compression element computed
based on effective width
Compression stress based on full width = Max (Mxx/Zxx+Myy/Zyy) for all

three unfactored combinations
Span for major axis bending = Span of purlin = 7.500 m
Span for minor axis bending = Span of purlin / (no. of sagrods + 1) = 1.88 m
Bending Moment Coefficient for Mxx(BMCX) = 8
Bending Moment Coefficient for Myy(BMCY) = 8
0.75(DL+W 0.75(DL+LL
DL+LL L1) +WL2)
Normal Load 0.992 -1.139 0.744 kN/m
Mxx 6.977 -8.008 5.233 KN-m

Myy 0.044 0.009 0.033 KN-m
N/sqm
Mxx/Zxx 154.011 -176.778 115.508 m
N/sqm
Myy/Zyy 4.729 0.933 3.547 m
Mxx/Zxx+Myy/Z N/sqm
yy 158.740 175.845 119.055 m
175.84
Max. Compression Stress = fbw = 5 N/sqmm
1758.4
= 52 kg/sqcm
1435/sqrt(f) = 34.221

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
w/t = 21.478 Hence OK
Design is restricted to Fully Effective Section
Maximum allowable Web Depth

As per clause 5.2.4, (h/t)max value for stiffened member is given as 200
84.95
h/t = 652 <200 Hence OK
Bending Compressive Stress in Flange :

As per clause 6.3 of IS 801 the Maximum compressive stress on Lateral Bucking of Flange is
calculated below
Calculate X=L2Sxc/(dIyc) and Y = Pi2ECb/Fy
Fb, the Allowable Compressive Stress based on Lateral Buckling of Flange

is calculated as Fb
CASE
X<0.18Y implies, Fb = 0.6 Fy - (i) 2070.0
X>0.18Y but X<0.9Y implies, Fb= 0.667 Fy – Fy . X / (2.7 Y) CASE
- (ii) 1940.2
CASE
X>0.9Y implies Fb = 0.3 Fy . Y / X - (iii) 3664.1
L = Unbraced Length of member = Span / (Number of sagrods+1) = 187.5 cm

Sxc = Compression Section Modulus of section about major axis =
Zxx = 45.30 Cm^3
d = Depth of Section = = 20 cm
Iyc = Moment of Inertia of the compression portion = Iyy/2 = 27.15 Cm^4
Hence, X = = 2933 (unitless)
3.1415
Pi = = 9
20740
E = Modulus of Elasticity, as per IS 801 is taken as = 00 kgf/sqcm
Cb as per IS 801 can be taken conservatively assuming M1=0 (end
span) = 1.75
Fy = 3450 kg/sqcm
Hence Y = 10383 (unitless)
Hence, 0.18 Y = 1869

And, 0.9 Y = 9345
CASE
Comparing X with 0.18Y and 0.9Y, the applicable case is (ii)
1940.2
Hence, Fb = = 2 kg/sqcm

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
= 194.02 N/sqmm
Basic Allowable Design Stress = 2070.0

0.6Fy = 0 kg/sqcm
= 207.00 N/sqmm
Hence, allowable stress is calculated as lower of

the two = 194.02 N/sqmm
DL+LL+WL
DL+LL DL+WL1 2
Mxx/Zxx+Myy/Z N/sqm
yy 158.740 175.845 119.055 m N/sqmm, calculated above
N/sqm 33% stress increased for
Allowable stress 194.022 258.695 258.695 m wind load case
Safety Ratio 0.818 0.680 0.460

Hence OK
Shear Stress in Web
As per clause 6.4.1 of IS 801,allowed maximum average shear stress Fv in

kgf/sqcm is calculated as
Case 1: If h/t is less than 4590/sqrt(Fy), Fv=1275 x sqrt(Fy) / (h/t) = 881.50

Case 2: If h/t is more than 4590/sqrt(Fy), Fv=5850000 / (h/t)^2 = 810.52
1380.0
Both are subject to maximum 0.4Fy = 0
h = 195.4 mm
t = 2.3 mm
84.956
Hence, h/t = = 52
4590/sqrt(Fy) = 78.1
Hence, Case is : case 2

Fv=5850000 / (h/t)^2, subject to
Hence, Fv = = maximum of 0.4Fy
= 810.52 kgf/sqcm
81.051
75 N/mm2
Here, w =
SQRT(Wn^2+Wt^2
Actual Shear '=wl/2 )
0.75(DL+W 0.75(DL+LL
DL+LL L1) +WL2)
Normal Load 0.992 -1.139 0.744 kN/m

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
Resultant ,w= 0.997 1.139 0.748 kN/m

Hence, Shear= 3.739 4.272 2.805 kN
Shear Stress N/mm
fv=V/dt 8.321 9.505 6.240 2
Stress Ratio 0.103 0.117 0.077

Hence OK
Bending Stress in
Web
As per clause 6.4.2of IS 801 for the design check of allowable stress in combined
shear and bending
Fbw = 36560000/(h/t)^2
Here, h/t already calculated above as 84.957
5065.3
88 kg/sqcm
506.53
Hence, Fbw = = 9 N/sqmm
Basic Allowable Design Stress calculated earlier = 0.6Fy 207 N/sqmm
207.00
Hence, governing value for Fbw = 0 N/sqmm
Already calculated fbw = Mxx/Zxx since Zyy at web is very high (x=t/2,
Z=I/x)
DL+LL+WL
DL+LL DL+WL1 2
N/sqm
Mxx/Zxx 154.011 176.778 115.508 m
N/sqm
Fbw 207.000 276 276 m
Safety Ratio 0.744 0.640 0.419

Hence OK
Combined Bending and Shear Stress in Web
As per clause 6.4.3of IS 801 for the design check of allowable stress in combined
shear and bending
2 2
√( ) +( ) ≤1
2 2
( ) +( ) =
0.134
2 2
√( ) +( ) =
0.366 Hence OK

PROJECT : REV : P2
WEST EXPANSION.
DEFELCTION CHECK:
Theoretical Deflection is calculated as (5/384) (wl^4/EI) for Simply Supported beam and (3/384)
(wl^4/EI) for multiple spans
Here, number of spans = 2

Hence, formula to use = (5/384) (wl^4/EI)
L = Span of the Purlin 7.500 m
DL+LL+WL
DL+LL DL+WL1 2
Normal Load 0.992 1.519 0.992 kN/m
w is normal component of unfactored distributed load in kN/m, max. of all

load combinations 1.519 kN/m
w is tangential component of unfactored distributed load in kN/m, max. of
all load combinations 0.099 kN/m
20740
E = Modulus of Elasticity, as per IS 801 is taken as = 00 kg/sqcm
20740
= 0 N/sqmm
I = Ixx = 453.00 Cm^4

I = Iyy = 54.30 Cm^4
Hence, Theoretical Deflection = 39.954 mm
= 0.09 mm
Allowable Deflection as IS codes is : Span/150 = 50.00 mm
Hence OK

MM Met D19084 RP 012

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

MM Met D19084 RP 012

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

FACTORY - NISSAN PLASTIC INJECTION WEST

Client: METEC DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

MARMAG INFRA PVT.LTD.

LOCATION : ORAGADAM, CHENNAI

CLIENT : METEC DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS

DESCRIPTION ISSUED FOR REVIEW

REV NO DATE DESCRIPTION ENGG CHECK APPVD

P0 24-10-2019 FIRST DRAFT PKH ASH SKV

P1 05-11-2019 SECOND DRAFT ASH PKH SKV

P2 15-11-2019 THIRD DRAFT ASH PKH SKV

2. STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 5

3. CODES AND STANDARDS ................................................................................................ 6

4. STRUCTURAL SYSTEM & METHODOLOGY ................................................................ 7

4.1 Structural System ................................................................................................................... 7

4.2 Material Properties ................................................................................................................. 8

5. LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS ............................................................................. 9

5.1 Dead Load (DL) ................................................................................................................ ..... 9

5.2 Live Load (LL) .................................................................................................................... 10

5.3 Wind Load (WL).................................................................................................................. 10

5.4 Earth Quake Load (EQL) ..................................................................................................... 12

5.5 Crane Load (CL) .................................................................................................................. 12

5.6 Load Combinations .............................................................................................................. 13

6. ANALYSIS & DESIGN ........................................................................................................... 14

6.1 Analysis & design– Strength ............................................................................................... 14

6.2 Bending Moment ................................................................................................................. 15

6.3 Deflection Limits – Limit State of Serviceability ................................................................ 16

MARMAG INFRA PVT. LTD., CHENNAI Page 4

Table 2.1 Building Description

1 Building Occupancy Warehouse

2 Width (m) 15.57 c/c

3 Length (m) 15.00 c/c

4 Clear height (m) from F.F.L 13.555

5 Roof slope 0.5 in 10 (Mono slope)

6 Wind bracings Roof bracing

7 Roof sheeting 0.5 mm thick Galvalume sheet

11 Rolling shutter 1 No (Existing )

13 Crane Beam(m) 10.338 (Top of crane beam)

14 Soil Bearing capacity 100 kN/m2 @ 2m Below Ground level

MARMAG INFRA PVT. LTD., CHENNAI Page 5

3. CODES AND STANDARDS

1. IS 800: 2007, General Construction in Steel – Code of Practice

2. IS 456: 2000 – Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete

MARMAG INFRA PVT. LTD., CHENNAI Page 6

4. STRUCTURAL SYSTEM & METHODOLOGY

4.1 Structural System

Fig4.1 – Rendered view of expansion structure, from STAAD Pro

MARMAG INFRA PVT. LTD., CHENNAI Page 7

4.2 Material Properties

Table-4.1 Elastic Properties of Materials

3 deformed bars Plinth Beam, 2 x 108 0.3 78.5

MARMAG INFRA PVT. LTD., CHENNAI Page 8

5. LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS

5.1 Dead Load (DL)

Table 5.1 Dead load

Self-weight factor for members including connections

2 Roofing Sheet 5 kg/m2

3 Wall cladding 5 kg/m2

4 Flange braces, sag rods etc. 10 kg/m2

5 Collateral load 50 kg/m2

7 Floor Finish 1 kN/m2

8 Unit Weight of Masonry Wall 20 kN/m3

9 Unit Weight of Soil 18 kN/m3

MARMAG INFRA PVT. LTD., CHENNAI Page 9