Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
NOTES / COMMENTS
This PSV is suggested in the previous calculations. There are two PSVs protecting shell side of the of E-
1
33101.
The available area including suggested PSV is more than the required area therefore these PSVs are
2
adequately sized.
With suggested piping, inlet line pressure drop for new PSV is 5.7% and outlet line pressure drop is 26.8%
3
which is within allowable limits.
PROJECT TITLE: County Line Train1 PSV Documentation and Flare Study REVISION NO.: XXX
CLIENT NAME: Stateline Processing, LLC
PREPARED BY: XXX DATE: 12/10/2019
CHECKED BY: XXX DATE: 12/10/2019
General Methodology
Stream properties were simulated in BR&E ProMax based on the relieving conditions calculated for each scenario.
Refer attachment for simulated properties.
Conclusions
PROJECT TITLE: County Line Train1 PSV Documentation and Flare Study REVISION NO.:
XXX
CLIENT NAME: Stateline Processing, LLC
PREPARED BY: XXX DATE: 12/10/2019
CHECKED BY: XXX DATE: 12/10/2019
Item Over Pressure Scenarios: Applicable In some cases to identify a Scenario as Not Requirements
2 Orifice Area
1 Applicable, an explanation may be needed. Capacity
Yes No 2
List any comments below. (lb/hr. or GPM) (in )
1 Accumulation of Non-Condensables No This is not an applicable overpressure scenario.
2 Check Valve Failure No This is not an applicable overpressure scenario.
3 Chemical Reaction No Chemical reaction in the system is negligible
4 Closed Outlets on Vessels (Liquid) No This is not an applicable overpressure scenario.
5 Closed Outlets on Vessels (Vapor) No This is not an applicable overpressure scenario.
6 Excessive Inlet Flow No This is not an applicable overpressure scenario.
7 Excessive Process Heat Input No This is not an applicable overpressure scenario.
Failure of Automatic Controls (BPCS Failure)
8 No This is not an applicable overpressure scenario.
(Liquid)
9 Failure of Tubes in Heat Exchangers Yes This is an applicable overpressure scenario. 48,667.23 2.596
10 Fire (External) - Wetted Yes Fire case is valid scenario. 6,010 1.00
11 Fire (External) - Unwetted No This is not an applicable overpressure scenario.
12 Flooding of Condensing Tubes No This is similar to cooling or reflux failure.
13 Inadvertent Valve open No This is not an applicable overpressure scenario.
14 Cooling or reflux failure No This is not an applicable overpressure scenario.
15 Loss of Electrical Power No This is not an applicable overpressure scenario.
16 Operator Error No This is not an applicable overpressure scenario.
22 Other No
23 Other No
1. For all scenarios listed above as applicable to this PRD application, calculations of required relieving rates must be documented and retained in the PRD
folder for each scenario.
2. Note the state of the fluid - vapor, liquid, flashing, or multi-phase.
PROJECT TITLE County Line Train1 PSV Documentation and Flare Study REVISION NO.: XXX
PLANT NAME: Stateline Processing, LLC
PREPARED BY: XXX DATE: 12/10/2019
CHECKED BY: XXX DATE: 12/10/2019
Select the primary type of relief device? (Rupture Disk/Relief Valve) Relief Valve
Does this device have an existing / new secondary relief device? Enter Area 1.43
Calculation Method (API/ASME) Select Vendor Orifices (RV only) API
Maximum Vapor Relief Case Maximum Liquid Relief Case
o o
INPUT: Rel. Temperature ( F) 37.8 INPUT: Rel. Temperature ( F)
Atm. Pressure (psia) 13.3 Atm. Pressure (psia)
Set Pressure (psig) 150 Set Pressure (psig)
Overpressure (%) 10 Overpressure (%)
Constant Backpress.(psig) 5 Constant Backpress.(psig)
k - (Cp/Cv) C= 327 1.1 Density (lb/ft3)
Z - Compressibility Factor 0.93 Viscosity (cP)
Molecular Weight 23.9 Kd - Discharge Coefficient
Viscosity (cP) 0.01 Kp - Liquid Flow Derating 0.6
Kd - Discharge Coefficient 0.975 Kv - Viscosity Correction 1.0
Kc - Tandem disk factor 1.0 Kc - Tandem disk factor 1.0
Kb - Backpressure Factor 1 Kw - Backpressure Factor 1.00
Valve Manufacturer (Kb) API
2 2
RESULTS: Area Required (in ) NET 2.596 RESULTS: Area Required (in ) NET 0.000
Orifice Required L Orifice Required #DIV/0!
2 2
Orifice Area (in ) 2.853 Orifice Area (in ) #DIV/0!
Max. Orifice Rate (lb/hr) 34490.32 Max. Orifice Rate (GPM) #DIV/0!
Rel. Pressure (psia) 178.30 Rel. Pressure (psia) 0
Inlet Hydraulic DP (psi) 8.54 Inlet Hydraulic DP (psi) #DIV/0!
Inlet Lines Losses (%) 5.7 Inlet Lines Losses (%) #DIV/0!
Built-up Backpressure (%) 23.5 Built-up Backpressure (%) #DIV/0!
Total Backpressure (%) 26.8 Total Backpressure (%) #DIV/0!
Kb - Backpressure Factor 1.00 Kw - Backpressure Factor #DIV/0!
Check Kb. If Inconsistent, use Iterate macro. Check Kw. If Inconsistent, use Iterate macro.
Inlet variable losses are greater than 3%.
M-040.050192
Results:
2
Wetted Area, head (ft ) 1
2
Wetted Area, cylinder (ft ) 12
2
Wetted Area, total (ft ) 13
Heat Input, Q (BTU/hr) 2.77E+05
Relief Load, W (lb/hr) 5.54E+03
Results
2
Total Wetted Area, Aw (ft ) 13 Vertical Vessel
Total Heat Input, Q (BTU/hr) 3.00E+05
Total Relief Load, W (lb/hr) 6,010
W V / AV 55,079.9
W L / AL
WV 48667 48667 lb / hr WL lb / hr
GPM
d-inlet, in. 4
d-outlet, in. 6
angle, deg. 30 (30 is typical for single size reduction,
45 for multiple size reduction, 180 for sudden)
NOTES: