Road to Change Management

in Teamcenter
Alex van der Linden
PLM Solution Architect
alex.van.der.linden@asml.com
Room 3 (Foyer 1)
PLM Europe / 25-Oct-2017 10:30-11:30 / Berlin
Survey Question 1 Confidential
Slide 2
26 October 2017

What is your relation to Siemens PLM?

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

0
Customer Integrator / reseller I am a Siemens PLM employee Other

powered by kahoot.com
 Public
Slide 3
26 October 2017

Agenda

• ASML Introduction
• Configuration Management
• Application Landscape
• The step to the future
• Challenges
• Process vs Functionality
 Public
Slide 4
26 October 2017

ASML Introduction
It’s hard to imagine a world without chips Public
Slide 5
26 October 2017
 More than 200 billion ICs are made every year Public
Slide 6
26 October 2017

IC units, in billions
250

In 2015, 230 billion

200 ICs were produced —
30 for every man,
150 woman and child on
the planet.
100
Global semiconductor
50 industry sales were
$335 billion.
0
1993

1996

1999
1991
1992

1994
1995

1997
1998

2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Data: WSTS
ASML makes the machines for making those chips Public
Slide 7
26 October 2017

• All of the world’s top chip makers are

our customers
• More than 16,000 employees (FTE)
worldwide
• Annual results 2016:
• Net sales: € 6,895 mln.
• R&D investments: € 1,106 mln.
• Average selling price: € 29 mln.
 Public
Slide 8
26 October 2017
Video about ASML Confidential
Slide 9
26 October 2017

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uq852vTfY2o
Current Teamcenter @ ASML Public
Slide 10
26 October 2017

• Teamcenter 10.1 – AWC 3.2 – NX 11

• Multi-site setup
• Netherlands (headquarters), United States (2x), Asia
• 10.000 active Teamcenter users (login within last three months)
• ~ 1500 NX users
• ~ 4000 Document creators
• ~ 4500 Viewers
• Clients:
• Desktop (TC Portal)
• Active Workspace (NL only; search docs only)
 Public
Slide 11
26 October 2017

Configuration Management
Survey Question 2 Confidential
Slide 12
26 October 2017

Do you know CMII?

18

16

14

12

10

0
Yes, we are using it (partly) Yes, but we don't use it I've heard of it Never heard of CMII

powered by kahoot.com
ASML: Implement CMII Closed Loop Change Process Confidential
CM = Configuration Management Slide 13
26 October 2017

• Close Loop Change Process

• CMII best practice
• ASML Objectives:
• Minimize corrective
actions/rework
• Cost and planning of
changes in control
• ASML Solution
• Implement CMII Closed
Loop Change Process
CMII @ ASML – Change Specialists Confidential
Slide 14
26 October 2017

• We started with CSII and

CSIII (time-to-market is
paramount for ASML)
• Daily standup ‘Change
Tracker’ to discuss the
process of change &
landscape of changes over
all projects
• Major support by upper
management
CMII @ ASML – Document Impact Analysis Confidential
Slide 15
26 October 2017

• Conduct cross-sectoral
impact analysis before
change approval
• Document Impact
Analysis (DIA)
• Main deliverable: DIA-BOM
• Document impact on the
BOM showing complete
planned impact
• Currently done outside
Teamcenter
 Public
Slide 16
26 October 2017

Application Landscape
past – current – future
1997  Introduction of Teamcenter & SAP Public
Slide 18
26 October 2017

Teamcenter SAP Production

• Teamcenter: the central part database for Design Engineering

• SAP: the central part database for Manufacturing
 Confidential
Slide 19
26 October 2017
2003  Introduction of ZECN Public
ZECN = custom build SAP transaction Slide 20
26 October 2017

SAP
ZECN
Teamcenter SAP Production

Change

• ZECN enables a controlled entry of part changes in SAP

including review possibilities.
 Confidential
Slide 21
26 October 2017
2008  Automated Part Interface Teamcenter-ZECN Public
Slide 22
26 October 2017

SAP
ZECN
Teamcenter SAP Production

Change

• Part release in Teamcenter is coupled with an automated interface to

ZECN in order to improve data consistency.
 Confidential
Slide 23
26 October 2017
Future  Change Management in Teamcenter & SAP Public
Slide 24
26 October 2017

SAP
Change Mgt
Teamcenter SAP Production

Change
Change Change

• Change Management in Teamcenter enables a change-controlled way-

of-working including review of the part data before releasing it to SAP.
• Change Management in SAP opens many standard SAP possibilities,
like using effectivity.
 Public
Slide 25
26 October 2017

The step to the future

Current Situation Public
Slide 26
26 October 2017

Teamcenter SAP SAP

ZECN Prod.

Part 123 Part Release Part 123 Review

EC 789 &
Effectuate
Logistic
Part 456 Part Release Part 456 Enrichment
EC 789
EC 789
Future Situation Public
Slide 27
26 October 2017

Teamcenter SAP SAP

Change Mgt Prod.

Part 123 Part 123

ECN Logistic
Review Effectuate
Release Enrichment
Part 456 Part 456

ECN 789 ER 789

Facilitate both: new WoW + old WoW Public
Slide 28
26 October 2017

Teamcenter SAP

Old Non ECN-Based

Part Release Parts
WoW Parts
Review

New
WoW ECN-Based Parts ECN Release Parts
Review
 Change Management in Teamcenter – Overview Public
Slide 29
26 October 2017

• Teamcenter Change Management = PR + ECR + ECN

• We will start using only ECN
• Within the ECN we’ll use:
ECN
• Impacted Items
Impacted Items
• Solution Items
• Reference Items Old Parts

Solution Items

X X √ New Parts

Reference Items

Supporting Docs
Problem Report Change Request Change Notice
Change Management in Teamcenter – Screenshot Public
Slide 30
26 October 2017
Survey Question 3 Confidential
Slide 31
26 October 2017

Are you using the Change Management module in Teamcenter?

20

18

16

14

12

10

0
Yes No No, but we're planning to I don't know / n.a.

powered by kahoot.com
 Public
Slide 32
26 October 2017

Challenges
Site consolidation Public
Slide 33
26 October 2017

• Currently 4 Teamcenter sites

• Support needed for real Global Change Management
• Consolidate to 1 Teamcenter site (Veldhoven, NL)

Veldhoven
Wilton
San Diego
Linkou
CMII: As-Planned/As-Released Baseline Public
Slide 34
26 October 2017

• CMII uses As-Planned/As-Released

Baseline for implementing ECNs
• Multi-level overview of planned
changes on an end-item
• Teamcenter doesn’t provide such
multi-level overview.
• How to plan a new item (revision)
without creating it in Teamcenter?
• Our Solution: Plan new item(rev)s
outside Teamcenter
CMII: Creator/User Public
Slide 35
26 October 2017

• CMII uses Creator/User principle

• Every document (including BoM) has a creator
and designated user
• Current Teamcenter configuration at ASML:
• Multiple datasets (= documents) within an Item
Revision
• Challenge:
• TC Workflows needed to support Creator/User
• Siemens: Execute TC Workflows on Item
Revisions, not Datasets
• Our plan:
• Consider all NX-data and BOM as ‘one
document’
• Configure Non-NX dataset as separate
Document Item(rev)
Survey Question 4 Confidential
Slide 36
26 October 2017

Are you using the Creator/User principle?

30

25

20

15

10

0
Yes, in Teamcenter Yes, but not in Teamcenter No I don't know / n.a.

powered by kahoot.com
Review of a change in Teamcenter (1/2) Public
Slide 37
26 October 2017

• Showing the delta is essential when reviewing a change

• Teamcenter does not provide this OOTB (Out of the Box)
• Custom reports to be created showing deltas on
• BOM-lines: which components have been added/removed/updated
• Attributes: which attributes have been updated
• Documents: which documents have been updated

ECN

Impacted Items

Old Parts

Solution Items
Delta
New Parts
Review of a change in Teamcenter (2/2) Public
Slide 38
26 October 2017

• Challenges when using Teamcenter OOTB reporting framework:

• Customization needed for useful / advanced reporting features
• Current review facilitated by ZECN tool (to be phased-out).
• ZECN provide rich reports, like showing changes in context of the
item hierarchy (see below). Can we level-up?
Concurrent Engineering / Unincorporated Changes Public
Slide 39
26 October 2017

• At ASML, concurrent engineering is very common

• Current WoW in Teamcenter @ ASML: Support by allowing multiple
non-released revisions
• Siemens advise: Do not allow multiple non-released revisions
• Teamcenter provides functionality “Unincorporated Changes”
• Which companies are using this?

Item

rev rev rev

A B C
Survey Question 5 Confidential
Slide 40
26 October 2017

Are you using the Unincorporated-Changes functionality?

35

30

25

20

15

10

0
Yes No, but we have challenges with No. Concurrent engineering is not I don't know / n.a.
concurrent engineering. an issue for us.

powered by kahoot.com
Item Disposition Public
Slide 41
26 October 2017

• When defining a product change, parts are typically replaced.

• Item Disposition specifies how to dispose physical parts that are
currently being used.
• Example values: Scrap, Rework, Use As Is
• ASML currently has customized Teamcenter to handle this.
• This customization gives conflicts when using ECN functionality
• Siemens has new OOTB capability to handle this.
• Available in AWC 3.3
Survey Question 6 Confidential
Slide 42
26 October 2017

Do you define Item Disposition?

30

25

20

15

10

0
Yes, in Teamcenter Yes, but not in Teamcenter No I don't know / n.a.

powered by kahoot.com
Supersedures & BOM Changes Public
Slide 43
26 October 2017

• Teamcenter Change Manager provides functionalities:

• Supersedures
• BOM Changes
• We plan not to use these
• Do you?
Survey Question 7 Confidential
Slide 44
26 October 2017

Are you using the Supersedure functionality in Teamcenter?

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

0
Yes No I don't know / n.a.

powered by kahoot.com
 Public
Slide 45
26 October 2017

Process vs Functionality
 ASML Process & Teamcenter Functionality Public
Slide 46

Process 26 October 2017

ASML Process
 ASML Process & Teamcenter Functionality Public
Slide 47

Configure Teamcenter 26 October 2017

ASML Process

TC OOTB
 ASML Process & Teamcenter Functionality Public
Slide 48

Add Customizations 26 October 2017

ASML Process

TC OOTB
& Customizations
 ASML Process & Teamcenter Functionality Public
Slide 49

Update ASML Process 26 October 2017

ASML Process

TC OOTB
& Customizations
 ASML Process & Teamcenter Functionality Public

Alternative Process  Less Customization

Slide 50
26 October 2017

ASML Process

TC OOTB
& Customizations
 Public
Slide 51
26 October 2017

Summary
Summary Public
Slide 52
26 October 2017

Release
Repository for Change Specialist III
Baseline

Released
Information

Revision History By User

Validate manual MCR DCR Validate document
Work
Authorizations Upgrade manual MCN Upgrade document
Deviations By Creator
Work Copies

Modification
Authorizations CIB

Record
Deviations
Impl. Plan
PR
ECR
ECN +
Order History FCN ECN
Impl. Plan

Change Specialist IV Change Specialist II

Cost Estimate
Complex Change (full track)
Change Specialist I By CRB

Business Decision &

Priority
Technical Review by Simple Change (fast track) ECR +
By Creator
Creator Impl. Plan

CMII @ ASML
Change Management Improvement

Implementation Challenges
Process vs Functionality Mapping
Survey Question 8 Confidential
Slide 53
26 October 2017

What do you think about this presentation?

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
:) :| :(

powered by kahoot.com
 Survey – Detailed Results (1/2) Confidential
Slide 54
26 October 2017

Are you using the

Are you using the
What is your relation to Are you using the Are you using the Unincorporated-Changes Do you define Item Supersedure
Players Email address Domain / Company Do you know CMII? Change Management
Siemens PLM? Creator/User principle? functionality? Disposition? functionality in
module in Teamcenter?
Teamcenter?

Per per.arild.strand@akerrolutions.com akerrolutions.com Yes, but not in Teamcenter

MROM maarten.romers@asml.com asml.com Customer Yes, we are using it (partly) No, but we're planning to No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
T. Center matthias.gantz@asmpt.com asmpt.com Customer Yes, but we don't use it Yes No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Ramon ramon.magermans@atos.net atos.net Integrator / reseller Yes, we are using it (partly) Yes I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
Frank frank.kuitems@atos.net atos.net Integrator / reseller Yes, we are using it (partly) I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
Paiste patrick.holenstein@avasis.biz avasis.biz Integrator / reseller Never heard of CMII No No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
Raak ramon.van.raak@daftrucks.com daftrucks.com Customer I've heard of it I don't know / n.a. No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
Kardyb frank.jessen@danfoss.com danfoss.com Yes, but we don't use it No Yes, in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, in Teamcenter No
Lars T l.thordsen@danfoss.com danfoss.com Customer Never heard of CMII No No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. No
Dan Foss ieannings@danfoss.com danfoss.com Customer Never heard of CMII I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. Yes, but not in Teamcenter I don't know / n.a.
HLD hanne.lill.dregeld@digitread.com digitread.com Integrator / reseller Yes, but we don't use it No I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
Jannes jannesn@dvna.nl dvna.nl Never heard of CMII No No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, in Teamcenter No
Jeannette jacob@ecs-gmbh.de ecs-gmbh.de Integrator / reseller Yes, we are using it (partly) Yes No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Nico nicolas.jaillard@edf.fr edf.fr Customer Never heard of CMII Yes Yes, in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
AT atheisen@ford.com ford.com Customer Never heard of CMII Yes I don't know / n.a. No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. Yes, but not in Teamcenter I don't know / n.a.
PLME harald.hofmann@fraenkische.de fraenkische.de Customer Yes, we are using it (partly) No I don't know / n.a. No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. No No
Anders anders.lackberg@gknaerospace.com gknaerospace.com Customer I've heard of it No, but we're planning to Yes, but not in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Clabo claes.waltersson@gknaerospace.com gknaerospace.com Customer Yes, but we don't use it No, but we're planning to I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. No No
Kish kishlaya.brahmachari@gknaerospace.com gknaerospace.com Customer Never heard of CMII No, but we're planning to I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Hunter per-olof.eriksson@gknaerospace.com gknaerospace.com Customer Yes, but we don't use it
Manni manfred.grass@hemle.de hemle.de Yes No No No
JS janez.skrbec@its-plm.si its-plm.si Integrator / reseller I've heard of it No No No
PNOV pascal.novaria@lighting.com lighting.com No No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
Oz ozgur.oz@lighting.com lighting.com Customer No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
Maxplus heiko.bleicher@mahle.com mahle.com No, but we're planning to I don't know / n.a.
Tamara tamara.geraads@mail.weir mail.weir Customer I've heard of it No, but we're planning to No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Phil philip.woodford@mt.com mt.com Customer Yes, we are using it (partly) No Yes, in Teamcenter No No
Chandra sarat.kanduri@mt.com mt.com Customer Yes, but we don't use it No, but we're planning to Yes, in Teamcenter No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. No No
OleW ole-wilhelm.aarum@nexans.com nexans.com Customer I've heard of it No No No
Jt john_thomas.iversen@nexans.com nexans.com Customer Never heard of CMII No, but we're planning to I don't know / n.a. No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No I don't know / n.a.
Kevin kevin.wessels@oce.com oce.com Customer Yes, we are using it (partly) Yes, in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, in Teamcenter Yes
Wojtek jadczyszyn.w@pg.com pg.com Customer Never heard of CMII Yes Yes, but not in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
ToHo hoff.t@pg.com pg.com Customer Never heard of CMII Yes No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
PLM’ist hannu.hannila@polar.com polar.com Other Yes Yes, in Teamcenter No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Stefan stefan.hovens@siemens.com siemens.com I am a Siemens PLM employee Yes, we are using it (partly) Yes No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No I don't know / n.a.
 Survey – Detailed Results (2/2) Confidential
Slide 55
26 October 2017

Are you using the

Are you using the
What is your relation to Are you using the Are you using the Unincorporated-Changes Do you define Item Supersedure
Players Email address Domain / Company Do you know CMII? Change Management
Siemens PLM? Creator/User principle? functionality? Disposition? functionality in
module in Teamcenter?
Teamcenter?
Mark mark.zeinstra@siemens.com siemens.com Customer Yes, but we don't use it I don't know / n.a. No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Marcel ganzenwinkel@siemens.com siemens.com I am a Siemens PLM employee Yes, but we don't use it Yes No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No I don't know / n.a.
J@rda jaroslav.kletecka@siemens.com siemens.com Customer Yes Yes, in Teamcenter I don't know / n.a. Yes, in Teamcenter Yes
Marc marc.erlwein@siemens-healthineers.com siemens-healthineers.com Other Never heard of CMII Yes Yes, in Teamcenter Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
PC srinidhi.madhugiri@siemens-healthineers.com siemens-healthineers.com I am a Siemens PLM employee Never heard of CMII Yes No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. No No
Yagiz ycanpolat@stm.com.tr stm.com.tr Customer No, but we're planning to No No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Whale makarovsky@teploobmennik.ru teploobmennik.ru Customer No Yes, in Teamcenter No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. No No
waltervl walter.van.leeuwen@vdletg.com vdletg.com Customer Yes, but we don't use it No, but we're planning to No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, in Teamcenter I don't know / n.a.
Billy ylianna.buhl@ventum.de ventum.de Other I've heard of it No No I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
Clemens clemens.frenzel@volkswagen.de volkswagen.de No, but we're planning to Yes, but not in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
Piet ger.vanderhulst@wartsila.com wartsila.com Customer Yes, in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
Johan johan.govers@wartsila.com wartsila.com Yes, but we don't use it Yes I don't know / n.a. No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us.
Themousr Customer Never heard of CMII No No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
PJ Customer Never heard of CMII No No No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. No No
Ian Customer I've heard of it No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
J. Hetfield Customer Yes, we are using it (partly) No, but we're planning to No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
JSp Yes No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
mike No I don't know / n.a. No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Timo Customer No No No
Act Yes, but not in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
TI If you know any missing No No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. No No
Simon Customer Never heard of CMII No I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
Andrew2 email addresses, No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
J Yes Yes, in Teamcenter Yes
Say please let me know. I don't know / n.a. No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
change master Yes, in Teamcenter Yes
Andrew - Alex Customer Yes, but we don't use it Yes
Timo2 No No
Change master Customer Never heard of CMII Yes
Z I don't know / n.a. No No
Ewan Yes, in Teamcenter No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
Musicbert Customer Never heard of CMII No
Duke Nukem I don't know / n.a. No I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
Muskalla Yes
Uwpic Customer
Have questions or feedback afterwards?
Please mail me: alex.van.der.linden@asml.com