HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT

MADURAI (NH) CIRCLE

MADURAI (NH) DIVISION

MADURAI (NH) SUB DIVISION

Name of Work : Strengthening of Kumaram - Sholavandhan

Road in Km 0/0 - 15/320.

Scheme and Year : CRF 2017 – 2018

Estimate Amount : Rs. 1200.00 Lakhs

Job Code : CRF – TN – 2017 – 18 – 89

 CHECK LIST FOR ROAD WORKS

1) Name of Wok : Strengthening of Kumaram - Sholavandhan

Road in Km 0/0 - 15/320.

2) Name of Scheme Under which : Revamped Central Road Fund 2017 – 2018.
work is taken up

3) Classification of Road : Major District Road (MD 955).

4) Whether administrative : Yes,
sanction of Government is Vide MoRT & H, Lr. No. RW/NH-
obtained? 28014/3/2016-TN/P-7,
dated 12.03.2018
(Job. No. CRF – TN – 2017 – 18 - 89) (Sl. No. 39
of Annexure I).
a) Nomenclature : Strengthening of Kumaram - Sholavandhan
Road in Km 0/0 - 15/320 including CD works.

b) Length : 15.320 Km.

c) Amount of Sanction : Rs. 1200.00 Lakhs.

5) Whether Nomenclature, : Yes.
Length and amount are as per
G.O?

6) Change in scope of sanction if : No.

any

7) Amount of estimate now : Rs. 1200.00 Lakhs.

prepared

8) Whether the estimate amount : Yes.

is within allowable limit of
Power of sanction of
competent authority?

9) Revised administrative : Dose Not Arise.

sanction if any
10) Whether the following details
are enclosed?
Site Plan, Index map : Yes.
Alignment of Road.

11) Whether L.S and C.S. working : Yes.

drawing, with quarry chart,
(quarry map countersigned by
concerned Divisional
Engineer (H) Regular) detailed
estimate etc., and Abstract
Specification Report etc., are
enclosed?

II.CHECK LIST FOR CD WORKS

1) Total No of CD Works : 73 Nos.

2) No of CD Works in Good Condition : 56 Nos.

3) No of CD works in Damaged : 17 Nos.

condition requiring Reconstruction

4) Whether all the CD works in : No.

damaged condition are proposed for
reconstruction

5) No. of Narrow CD works which : Nil.

require widening

6) Whether all the CD works with : No.

narrow width are proposed for
widening?

7) No. of Cut stone culverts existing : 11 Nos.

8) No. of Cut stone culverts proposed : 9 Nos.

for reconstruction as pipe culvert /
slab
 PART – III-A
PAVEMENT – WIDENING
1) Whether widening is proposed as per : No.
IRC 37 – 2012

2) Whether full design life is adopted, : NA.

or stage construction is proposed

3) If Stage construction is adopted, : Yes, 15 years (MDR)

whether Base and Sub Base are
designed for full design life
4) Design life for Bituminous layers and : Yes, 5 years
whether minimum design life of 5
years is provided

5) Design Traffic in MSA and CBR : Yes, 80th Percentile CBR &
considered in the Estimate Result Enclosed
5 years – 4.28 & 4.06 Msa
(Base)
15 years – 16.73 & 15.84 Msa
(Sub Base)
PART – III-B
PAVEMENT – STRENGTHENING

1) Whether Strengthening is proposed : Yes.

as per IRC 81 – 1997

2) Whether BBD test was conducted : Yes.

3) Design life considered for : 5 years

strengthening
4) Strengthening are designed for same : Yes.
design life
5) Whether uniformity in wearing : Does Not Arise.
course in widening and
strengthening is ensured

6) Whether profile correction Course is : No

proposed
7) If PCC is proposed, whether C.S are : Not applicable
enclosed
 PART – IV
RATES

1) Whether current rates adopted? : Yes, 2017-18 rate is adopted,

SOR pertaining to Madurai
District.
2) Whether Latest Bitumen rates are : Yes, 16.04.2018 rate is
adopted? adopted.
3) Whether approved RMR is enclosed? : Yes, enclosed.
4) Whether Quarry Chart and Map are : Yes, enclosed.
enclosed?

5) Whether Bitumen lead particulars : Yes, enclosed.

are provided?
6) Whether Emulsion lead particulars : Yes, enclosed.
are provided?
PART – V
OTHER ITEMS

Whether the Estimate is providing adequate provision for the following items?

1) Provision for Land Acquisition for the : Does not arise.

following item

2) Provisions for Name Board, KM : Yes.

Stones and Road Furniture
3) Provision for Quality Control and : Yes.
Testing
4) Provision for Advertising Charges : No.
5) Provision for Shifting of Utilities : No.
6) Provision for Contingencies : Yes.
7) Provision for Price Escalation (if any) : No.
Mention duration of work

8) Any special provision for particular : Nil.

type of work any required?
 PART – VI

Whether the following Certificates are furnished?

1) Certified that the particulars furnished : Yes

above are based on site inspection and
are correct

2) Certified that the provision made under : Yes

L.S are adequate and do not warrant
revisions.

PART – VII
TECHNICAL SANCTION

1) Estimate Amount : Rs. 1200.00 Lakhs

2) Monetary limit for the sanctioning : Rs. Lakhs

authority

3) Sanction Number and Date : C. R. No. /2018-19

CERTIFICATE

1) Certified that the above particulars furnished are correct to the best of my
knowledge.
2) Certified that all the necessary provisions based on the site conditions have
been made in this estimate.

Divisional Engineer Assistant Divisional Engineer Assistant Engineer

National Highways National Highways National Highways
Madurai Madurai Usilampatti
SPECIFICATION REPORT TO ACCOMPANY THE ESTIMATE FOR
THE WORK OF STRENGTHENING OF KUMARAM -
SHOLAVANDHAN ROAD IN KM 0/0 - 15/320.
Estimate Amount Rs. 1200.00 Lakhs
Job. No. CRF – TN – 2017 – 18 – 89

Name of Work:

Strengthening of Kumaram - Sholavandhan Road in Km 0/0 - 15/320.

Scheme and Authority:
The administrative sanction for the above work has been accorded for Rs.
1200.00 Lakhs under the scheme of Revamped Central Road Fund 2017 - 2018
vide MoRT & H, Lr. No. RW/NH-28014/3/2016-TN/P-7, dated: 12.03.2018 (Job.
No. CRF – TN – 2017 – 18 - 89) (Sl. No. 39 of Annexure I) and Financial sanction
accorded in G. O. Ms. No. 82, Highways and Minor Ports (HV2) Department, Dated
11-10-2017

Change in Nomenclature:

There is no change in length and also no need to change the nomenclature

is required in this work.

Location and Classification:

It is one of the important Major District Road in Madurai District. This road
is branching from Km 13/0 of Madurai – Palamedu Road (MDR - 227), which
crosses at km 417/8 of Srinagar – Kanyakumari road (NH – 7) and ends at Km
0/8 of Sholavandan – Valayapatti (via) Aundipatti Road (MDR - 568). This road is
having a total length of 15.320 Km from Km 0/0 – 15/320
The stretches in Km 0/0 – 6/6 of this road is being maintained by Madurai
west (H), Construction & Maintenance Sub Division and the stretches in Km 6/6
– 15/320 of this road is being maintained by Vadipatti (H), Construction &
Maintenance Sub Division of Madurai (H), Construction & Maintenance Division.

Necessity and Need for Improvement:

This road is originating from Madurai – Palamedu Road (MDR - 227) and passes
through the villages such as Ariyur, Pillayarnatham, Ambalathadi, Vayalur,
Anaikkulam, Sithalangudi, Rayapuram, Thirumalnatham, Alankottaram and
crosses Srinagar – Kanyakumari road (NH – 7) at Km 9/4 and also ends at km
15/320 in Sholavandan Township of Madurai District. These villages are playing
a vital role in supply of agricultural products to the part of the district and also
the surplus agricultural products and cattle are export to the other nearer
districts from these villages. This road acts as one of the important link road which
connects the famous Kuruvithurai temple Pilgrim Centre and Anaippatti Anjeneya
Temple pilgrim centre with National Highways Road, namely Srinagar –
Kanyakumari road (NH – 7)). This road is an important link road connecting
Sholavandan Township with Alanganallur, Palamedu and Anaiyur townships
which are acts as a major agricultural trade points of Madurai District. There are
many private metal and gravel quarries are situated in and around this road and
hence heavy vehicles such as Commercial Transport Vehicles are plying through
this road. The sand carrying vehicles are using this road for their daily routine.
This routine makes this road keeps busy day and night. Hence the traffic intensity
is increasing day by day. Further nearest traffic intensity at Km 9/4 of this road
is 951 CVPD and the PCU is 9112 and at km 12/4 of this road is 900 CVPD and
the PCU is 9021 on May 2014.
The existing carriage way width of this stretch is having 7.00m in km 0/0 –
15/320 which is in damaged condition with many potholes making a traffic
hindrance to the Road Consumers. Frequently accidents take place due to the
damaged nature. Hence it is very essential to improve this road as per IRC 37 –
2012 & IRC 81 - 1997 to cater free flow of vehicular traffic.

Traffic Census:

The Traffic Census has been carried out at Km 9/4 & 12/4 and the
results tabulated below:
Location of Period of Commercial Vehicle Peak /
PCU
Census Point Census per Day Normal

Km 9/4 May 2014. 951 9112 Peak

Km 12/4 May 2014. 900 9021 Peak

Details of Last Renewal:

REACH (in km) Year of last Renewal

Km 0/0 - 15/320 CRF 2011 - 2012

Existing Condition of the Road:

The existing road in this stretch in km 0/0 – 15/320 is having Two Lane
with Single carriage way of 7.00 M and also the existing pavement of this stretch
is renewed in the year 2011 - 2012 under the scheme of CRF 2011 – 2012.
The road is available with a worn-out condition in many stretches and
many potholes, undulations and structural cracks were formed throughout the
stretches of the road makes the poor riding quality of the road surface and it
leads traffic hindrance and accidents. In stretches 0/0 – 9/4 BBD test is unable
to conduct due to the worn-out condition of the rod. So, the CBR Method is
adopted in this Estimate.
Existing Pavement Details
Existing Existing pavement thickness
Formation
carriage (in mm) Soil
Chainage Width
way Sub Sub Bituminous Tota type
(in m)
width Grade Base Layer l
Claye
Km 0/0 – 1/0 7.00 m 140 300 28 468 12.00
y Soil
Claye
Km 1/0 – 2/0 7.00 m 160 280 34 474 12.00
y Soil
Claye
Km 2/0 – 3/0 7.00 m 155 285 30 470 12.00
y Soil
Claye
Km 3/0 – 4/0 7.00 m 145 295 20 460 12.00
y Soil
Claye
Km 4/0 – 5/0 7.00 m 160 280 25 465 12.00
y Soil
Claye
Km 5/0 – 6/0 7.00 m 150 290 27 467 12.00
y Soil
Claye
Km 6/0 – 7/0 7.00 m 155 285 32 472 12.00
y Soil
Claye
Km 7/0 – 8/0 7.00 m 135 305 30 470 12.00
y Soil
Claye
Km 8/0 – 9/0 7.00 m 125 315 25 465 12.00
y Soil
 Existing Existing pavement thickness
Formation
carriage (in mm) Soil
Chainage Width
way Sub Sub Bituminous Tota type
(in m)
width Grade Base Layer l
Claye
Km 9/0 – 9/4 7.00 m 150 290 25 465 12.00
y Soil
Claye
Km 9/4 – 10/0 7.00 m 140 450 55 645 12.00
y Soil
Claye
Km 10/0 – 11/0 7.00 m 130 440 64 634 12.00
y Soil
Claye
Km 11/0 – 12/0 7.00 m 160 425 54 639 12.00
y Soil
Claye
Km 12/0 – 13/0 7.00 m 155 425 58 638 12.00
y Soil
Claye
Km 13/0 – 14/0 7.00 m 150 425 63 638 12.00
y Soil
Claye
Km 14/0 – 15/0 7.00 m 125 455 56 636 12.00
y Soil
Km 15/0 – Claye
7.00 m 150 420 60 630 12.00
15/320 y Soil

BBD Values:
The BBD tests are conducted by Quality Control (NH), Madurai and test

results are enclosed separately and following are the BBD values arrived as per

test.

Sl. No. REACH (KM) Characteristic Deflection

1 Km 9/4 – 10/0 1.867

2 Km 10/0 – 11/0 1.858

3 Km 11/0 – 12/0 1.894

4 Km 12/0 – 13/0 1.885

5 Km 13/0 – 14/0 1.872

6 Km 14/0 – 15/0 1.863

7 Km 15/0 – 15/320 1.894

Design Traffic Calculations:

1. Reach in km 0/0 – 9/4

1 No. of Traffic Lane Two Lane.

2 Type of Carriage Way (Single / Divided) Single
3 Terrain [Hilly / Plain] Plain Terrain
Number of Commercial Vehicle per day as
4 951
per last count [Both directions] (P)
5 Year of Census [Last Count] May 2014
6 Year of preparation of Design 2018
Construction Period Years between last
7 count and year of completion of 12 Months
Construction (X)
8 Design Life (n) 15 Years
9 Traffic growth rate per annum [r] 5.00 %
10 Vehicle Damage Factor (D) 3.50
11 Lane Distribution Factor (F) 0.50
Initial traffic volume after completion of
12 1214 CVD
Construction (A)
Reach in km 9/4 – 15/320

1 No. of Traffic Lane Two Lane.

2 Type of Carriage Way (Single / Divided) Single
3 Terrain [Hilly / Plain] Plain Terrain
Number of Commercial Vehicle per day as
4 900
per last count [Both directions] (P)
5 Year of Census [Last Count] May 2014
6 Year of preparation of Design 2018
Construction Period Years between last
7 count and year of completion of 12 Months
Construction (X)
8 Design Life (n) 15 Years
9 Traffic growth rate per annum [r] 5.00 %
10 Vehicle Damage Factor (D) 3.50
11 Lane Distribution Factor (F) 0.50
Initial traffic volume after completion of
12 1149 CVD
Construction (A)
Design Calculation:
Since it is an MDR road, the Base and Sub base designed for 15 years of
life period and bituminous layers designed for 5 years of life period as stage
construction.
Computation of Design Traffic as per IRC: 37-2012 clause 3.3.6.1 as
follows,
𝟑𝟔𝟓 𝑿 [(𝟏 + 𝒓)𝒏 − 𝟏]
𝑵 = 𝑿𝑨𝑿𝑫𝑿𝑭
𝒓
Reach in km 0/0 – 9/4:
Design Calculation for 15 Years (Base & Sub base):
Cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for the Design life 15
years as follows,
𝟑𝟔𝟓 𝑿 [(𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟎𝟓)𝟏𝟓 − 𝟏]
𝑵 = 𝑿 𝟏𝟐𝟏𝟒 𝑿 𝟑. 𝟓𝟎 𝑿 𝟎. 𝟓𝟎 = 𝟏𝟔. 𝟕𝟑 𝑴𝑺𝒂
𝟎. 𝟎𝟓
Design Calculation for 5 Years (Bituminous Layers):
Cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for the Design life 5
years as follows,
𝟑𝟔𝟓 𝑿 [(𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟎𝟓)𝟓 − 𝟏]
𝑵 = 𝑿 𝟏𝟐𝟏𝟒 𝑿 𝟑. 𝟓𝟎 𝑿 𝟎. 𝟓𝟎 = 𝟒. 𝟐𝟖 𝑴𝑺𝒂
𝟎. 𝟎𝟓
Reach in km 9/4 – 15/320:
Design Calculation for 15 Years (Base & Sub base):
Cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for the Design life 15
years as follows,
𝟑𝟔𝟓 𝑿 [(𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟎𝟓)𝟏𝟓 − 𝟏]
𝑵 = 𝑿 𝟏𝟏𝟒𝟗 𝑿 𝟑. 𝟓𝟎 𝑿 𝟎. 𝟓𝟎 = 𝟏𝟓. 𝟖𝟒 𝑴𝑺𝒂
𝟎. 𝟎𝟓

Design Calculation for 5 Years (Bituminous Layers):

Cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for the Design life 5
years as follows,
𝟑𝟔𝟓 𝑿 [(𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟎𝟓)𝟓 − 𝟏]
𝑵 = 𝑿 𝟏𝟏𝟒𝟗 𝑿 𝟑. 𝟓𝟎 𝑿 𝟎. 𝟓𝟎 = 𝟒. 𝟎𝟔 𝑴𝑺𝒂
𝟎. 𝟎𝟓
Sub Grade Soil Properties:

CBR Values:

The soil tests are conducted by National Highways Quality Control

Sub division, Madurai on 13.04.2018 and the results of the CBR values arrived
as per test is tabulated below.

Sl. REACH Design CBR

CBR
No. (in Km) (80th Percentile)
1 km 0/410 LHS 4 4.25

2 km 0/880 RHS 5 4.25

3 km 1/428 LHS 4 4.25

4 km 1/930 RHS 4 4.25

5 km 2/437 LHS 4 4.25

6 km 2/ 790 RHS 5 4.25

7 km 3/200 RHS 4 4.25

8 km 3/950 LHS 5 4.25

9 km 4/200 RHS 4 4.25

10 km 4/720 LHS 4 4.25

11 km 5/120 RHS 4 4.25

12 km 5/850 LHS 5 4.25

13 km 6/305 LHS 4 4.25

14 km 6/980 RHS 4 4.25

15 km 7/405 RHS 6 4.25

16 km 7/901 RHS 5 4.25

17 km 8/446 LHS 4 4.25

18 km 8/930 RHS 4 4.25

Design for Widening & Strengthening by CBR Method:
Reach in Km 0/0 - 15/320:
Pavement Thickness
Modulus (Mpa)
composition (in mm)

BC 30
Layer 1 1700 for VG 30
DBM 50

WMM 250 =.2*(Thickness of granular layer)

Layer 2
GSB 390 ^0.45*modulus of sub grade

Total Layer Tk. 720

Fatigue criteria

The limiting horizontal tensile strain in the bottom of the bituminous

layer is calculated for the design traffic (Nf) for 90% reliability equation in case of
design traffic more than 30msa, otherwise, calculated for 80% reliability equation

Rutting Criteria
The limiting vertical compressive strain at the top of the sub grade is
calculated for the design traffic (Nr) for 90% reliability equation in case of design
traffic more than 30msa, otherwise, calculated for 80% reliability equation.
The limiting horizontal tensile strain at the bottom of the bituminous
layer and the vertical compressive strain at the top of the subgrade are checked
with the allowable strains for the standard axial load using IITPAVE for safety and
economy.
For Strengthening by CBR Method:
In Reach 0/0 – 9/4:

Criteria Limiting strain Actual strain

Fatigue 443 micro Strain 442 micro Strain

Rutting 601 micro Strain 419 micro Strain

Strengthening Proposal by CBR method:
Note: The Thin Worn-out BT Surface will be removed as per MoRT & H cl. No. 111, 112, 202 before laying WMM.

Hence, Existing BT Thickness is not considered for Crust Thickness in the stretches in Km 0/0 – 9/4.

Required
Thickness Proposed Pavement Thickness (in
Additional Total
Required Existing mm)
Thickness as Thickness
Stretch Msa as per IRC: Thickness
per Proposed
37 - 2012 (in mm)
IRC: 37 - 2012 GSB V WMM DBM BC (in mm)
(in mm)
(in mm)
Km 0/0 – 1/0 4.28 720 440 280 --- 200 50 30 280

Km 1/0 – 2/0 4.28 720 440 280 --- 200 50 30 280

Km 2/0 – 3/0 4.28 720 440 280 --- 200 50 30 280

Km 3/0 – 4/0 4.28 720 440 280 --- 200 50 30 280

Km 4/0 – 5/0 4.28 720 440 280 --- 200 50 30 280

Km 5/0 – 6/0 4.28 720 440 280 --- 200 50 30 280

Km 6/0 – 7/0 4.28 720 440 280 --- 200 50 30 280

Km 7/0 – 8/0 4.28 720 440 280 --- 200 50 30 280

Km 8/0 – 9/0 4.28 720 440 280 --- 200 50 30 280

Km 9/0 – 9/4 4.28 720 440 280 --- 200 50 30 280

Strengthening by BBD Method:

Proposed Pavement Thickness

Ch. Required Thickness as Total
(in mm)
Stretch Msa Deflection per IRC – 81 Thickness
(in mm) (in mm) WMM DBM BC Proposed

Km 9/4 – 10/0 4.06 1.867 111 --- 50 30 114

Km 10/0 – 11/0 4.06 1.858 111 --- 50 30 114

Km 11/0 – 12/0 4.06 1.894 113 --- 50 30 114

Km 12/0 – 13/0 4.06 1.885 113 --- 50 30 114

Km 13/0 – 14/0 4.06 1.872 112 --- 50 30 114

Km 14/0 – 15/0 4.06 1.863 111 --- 50 30 114

Km 15/0 – 15/320 4.06 1.894 113 --- 50 30 114

Proposal for Strengthening by CBR method:

Moreover, it is necessary to maintain the minimum crust thickness

of the existing road stretches as per the IRC: 37 – 2012. Based on the CBR of the
soil and Msa values, Wet Mix Macadam is proposed to the thickness of 200mm
for the entire width of road. As per the Design, the proposed Bituminous layer
thickness is more than the required values. Bituminous Concrete is proposed as
a Wearing Course to a thickness of 30mm for the entire width.

Proposal for Strengthening by BBD method:

Moreover, it is necessary to maintain the condition of the existing

road stretches as per the IRC: 81 – 1997. Based on the BBD deflection of the road
and as per the Design, the proposed Bituminous layer thickness is more than the
required values. Bituminous Concrete is proposed as a Wearing Course to a
thickness of 30mm for the entire width.
Cross Drainage Works:
The stretches in Km 0/0 - 15/320 are having 57 Nos. of culverts with good
condition. Apart from those, 16 Nos. culverts are insufficient and damaged in
condition. The 16 Nos. of culverts must be Upgraded to the Standard width by
providing 8 Nos. of Single Row Pipe Culverts, 3 Nos. Two Row Pipe Culverts and
4 Nos. are as RCC Slab Culverts as per the field condition. 1 No. of culvert has
been proposed by C & M (H), Vadippatti Section
Retaining Wall:
The stretches at Km 12/300 – 12/500 are having high embankment in
adjacent to the roadside ground level and also near the PWD Channel Stream
crossing. So, it is necessary to construct the retaining wall in the stretches of the
road in the high embankment portions in order to protect the shoulders of the
road from erosion due to natural calamities
Shoulders:
As per IRC: 73 – 1980 it is proposed to improve the shoulders by carted
earth to a required thickness to a width of 1.00m on both sides for a total Road
Way Width of 9.00m for MDR requirements.
Overall Proposals for Strengthening:

Improvement Proposal
Ch. Design Traffic Existing Proposed
Design (in mm)
Deflection Lane Width
Stretch CBR Lane Crust
(in mm) 15 Years 5 Years WMM DBM BC (in M)
Width Thickness

Km 0/0 – 1/0 4.25 --- 16.73 4.28 7.00 440 200 50 30 7.00

Km 1/0 – 2/0 4.25 --- 16.73 4.28 7.00 440 200 50 30 7.00

Km 2/0 – 3/0 4.25 --- 16.73 4.28 7.00 440 200 50 30 7.00

Km 3/0 – 4/0 4.25 --- 16.73 4.28 7.00 440 200 50 30 7.00

Km 4/0 – 5/0 4.25 --- 16.73 4.28 7.00 440 200 50 30 7.00

Km 5/0 – 6/0 4.25 --- 16.73 4.28 7.00 440 200 50 30 7.00

Km 6/0 – 7/0 4.25 --- 16.73 4.28 7.00 440 200 50 30 7.00

Km 7/0 – 8/0 4.25 --- 16.73 4.28 7.00 440 200 50 30 7.00

Km 8/0 – 9/0 4.25 --- 16.73 4.28 7.00 440 200 50 30 7.00

Km 9/0 – 9/4 4.25 --- 16.73 4.28 7.00 440 200 50 30 7.00
 Improvement Proposal
Ch. Design Traffic Existing Proposed
Design (in mm)
Deflection Lane Width
Stretch CBR 15 Lane Crust
(in mm) 5 Years WMM DBM BC (in M)
Years Width Thickness

Km 9/4 – 10/0 --- 1.867 15.84 4.06 7.00 645 --- 50 30 7.00

Km 10/0 – 11/0 --- 1.858 15.84 4.06 7.00 634 --- 50 30 7.00

Km 11/0 – 12/0 --- 1.894 15.84 4.06 7.00 639 --- 50 30 7.00

Km 12/0 – 13/0 --- 1.885 15.84 4.06 7.00 638 --- 50 30 7.00

Km 13/0 – 14/0 --- 1.872 15.84 4.06 7.00 638 --- 50 30 7.00

Km 14/0 – 15/0 --- 1.863 15.84 4.06 7.00 636 --- 50 30 7.00

Km 15/0 – 15/320 --- 1.894 15.84 4.06 7.00 630 --- 50 30 7.00
Inventory of Cross Drainage Works:

Clear Whether Reconstruction/

Road widening required
Sl.
Locations Type of Culvert Way Proposal Approved By
No. Narrow or
Width Good or
sufficient
Available Damaged
width
RCC Slab Culvert
Sufficient
1 Km 0/2 (i) with Single Span of 12.00 M Good --- ---
1.20 m Width
RCC Slab Culvert
Sufficient
2 Km 0/2 (ii) with Single Span of 12.00 M Good --- ---
1.20 m Width
RCC Slab Culvert
Sufficient
3 Km 0/2 (iii) with Single Span 12.00 M Good --- ---
of1.20 m Width
RCC Slab Culvert
Sufficient
4 Km 0/2 (iv) with Single Span of 12.00 M Good --- ---
1.20 m
Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

5 Km 0/4 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

6 Km 0/6 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

7 Km 0/8 (i) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

8 Km 0/8 (ii) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

9 Km 0/10 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert Width
 Clear Whether Reconstruction/
Road widening required
Sl.
Locations Type of Culvert Way Narrow or Proposal Approved By
No.
Width Good or
sufficient
Available Damaged
width
Single Row Pipe Sufficient
10 Km 1/2 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

11 Km 1/4 (i) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width
Minor Bridge with
Sufficient
12 Km 1/4 (ii) Four Span of 5.60 12.00 M Good --- ---
m Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

13 Km 1/8 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

14 Km 1/10 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

15 Km 2/4 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Three Row Pipe Sufficient

16 Km 2/6 (i) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

17 Km 2/6 (ii) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

18 Km 2/6 (iii) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

19 Km 2/8 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width
 Clear Whether Reconstruction/
Road widening required
Sl.
Locations Type of Culvert Way Narrow or Proposal Approved By
No. Good or
Width sufficient
Damaged
Available width
Single Row Pipe Sufficient
20 Km 2/10 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

21 Km 3/2 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

22 Km 3/4 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

23 Km 3/6 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

24 Km 3/8 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

25 Km 3/10 (i) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

26 Km 3/10 (ii) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

27 Km 4/4 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

28 Km 4/6 (i) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width
RCC Slab Culvert Divisional
29 Km 4/6 (ii) Cause Way 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged with a span of Engineer (NH)
6.40 m Madurai
 Clear Whether Reconstruction/
Road widening required
Sl.
Locations Type of Culvert Way Narrow or Proposal Approved By
No. Good or
Width sufficient
Damaged
Available width
Minor Bridge with
Sufficient
30 Km 4/8 Single Span of 12.00 M Good --- ---
10.60 m Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

31 Km 4/10 (i) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

32 Km 4/10 (ii) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width
Single Row RCC Divisional
Single Row Pipe
33 Km 5/2 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged Pipe Culvert Engineer (NH)
Culvert 900mm ø
1000mm ø Madurai
Single Row RCC Divisional
Single Row Pipe
34 Km 5/4 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged Pipe Culvert Engineer (NH)
Culvert 900mm ø
1000mm ø Madurai
Single Row Pipe Sufficient
35 Km 5/6 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

36 Km 5/8 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

37 Km 5/10 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width
Two row RCC Divisional
Two Row Pipe
38 Km 6/2 (i) 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged Pipe Culvert Engineer (NH)
Culvert 900mm ø
1000mm ø Madurai
Single Row RCC Divisional
Single Row Pipe
39 Km 6/2 (ii) 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged Pipe Culvert Engineer (NH)
Culvert 900mm ø
1000mm ø Madurai
 Clear Whether Reconstruction/
Road widening required
Sl.
Locations Type of Culvert Way Narrow or Proposal Approved By
No. Good or
Width sufficient
Damaged
Available width
Single Row Pipe Sufficient
40 Km 6/4 (i) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

41 Km 6/4 (ii) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

42 Km 6/6 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

43 Km 6/8 (i) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Minor Bridge with Sufficient

44 Km 6/8 (ii) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Two Span of 6.40 m Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

45 Km 6/10 (i) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width
Cut Stone Slab Single Row RCC Divisional
46 Km 6/10 (ii) Culvert Single Vent 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged Pipe Culvert Engineer (NH)
of 0.90m 1000mm ø Madurai
Cut Stone Slab Single row RCC Divisional
47 Km 7/4 Culvert Single Vent 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged Pipe Culvert Engineer (NH)
of 0.90m 1000mm ø Madurai
Cut Stone Slab Single Row RCC Divisional
48 Km 7/6 (i) Culvert Single Vent 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged Pipe Culvert Engineer (NH)
of 0.90m 1000mm ø Madurai
RCC Slab Culvert Divisional
Four Row Pipe
49 Km 7/6 (ii) 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged with a span of Engineer (NH)
Culvert 900mm ø
4.40 m Madurai
 Clear Whether Reconstruction/
Road widening required
Sl.
Locations Type of Culvert Way Narrow or Proposal Approved By
No.
Width Good or
sufficient
Available Damaged
width
Single Row Pipe Sufficient
50 Km 7/10 (i) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

51 Km 7/10 (ii) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width
Cut Stone Slab Single Row RCC Divisional
52 Km 8/2 Culvert Single Vent 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged Pipe Culvert Engineer (NH)
of 0.90 m 1000mm ø Madurai
Single Row Pipe Sufficient
53 Km 8/8 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

54 Km 9/2 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

55 Km 9/4 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width
Cut Stone Slab Two row RCC Divisional
56 Km 9/6 Culvert Two Vent of 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged Pipe Culvert Engineer (NH)
1.00 m 1000mm ø Madurai
Cut Stone Slab Two row RCC Divisional
57 Km 9/8 Culvert Two Vent of 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged Pipe Culvert Engineer (NH)
1.00 m 1000mm ø Madurai
Single Row Pipe Sufficient
58 Km 10/2 (i) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

59 Km 10/2 (ii) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width
 Clear Whether Reconstruction/
Road widening required
Sl.
Locations Type of Culvert Way Narrow or Proposal Approved By
No. Good or
Width sufficient
Damaged
Available width
Cut Stone Slab Sanctioned under
Km 10/10
60 Culvert Two Vent of 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged Not Proposed CRIDP 2017 -
(i)
1.85 m 2018
Km 10/10 Single Row Pipe Sufficient
61 12.00 M Good --- ---
(ii) Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

62 Km 11/2 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width
Cut Stone Slab Single Row RCC Divisional
63 Km 11/6 Culvert Single Vent 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged Pipe Culvert Engineer (NH)
of 0.90 m 1000mm ø Madurai
RCC Slab Culvert
Sufficient
64 Km 11/8 with Single Span of 12.00 M Good --- ---
3.00 m Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

65 Km 11/10 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width
Cut Stone Slab Sanctioned under
66 Km 12/4 (i) Culvert Four Vent 5.90 m Narrow Width Damaged Not Proposed CRIDP 2017 -
of 1.80 m 2018
Cut Stone Slab RCC Slab Culvert Divisional
67 Km 12/4 (ii) Culvert Two Vent of 5.90 m Narrow Width Damaged with a span of Engineer (NH)
1.80 m 4.40 m Madurai
Km 13/10 Two Row Pipe Sufficient
68 12.00 M Good --- ---
(i) Culvert 1000mm ø Width
Cut Stone Slab RCC Slab Culvert Divisional
Km 13/10
69 Culvert Two Vent of 7.00 m Narrow Width Damaged with a span of Engineer (NH)
(ii)
1.80 m 4.40 m Madurai
 Clear Whether Reconstruction/
Road widening required
Sl.
Locations Type of Culvert Way Narrow or Proposal Approved By
No.
Width Good or
sufficient
Available Damaged
width
Two Row Pipe Sufficient
70 Km 14/4 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

71 Km 14/8 (i) 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width
RCC Slab Culvert
Sufficient
72 Km 14/8 (ii) with Single Span of 12.00 M Good --- ---
3.00m Width

Single Row Pipe Sufficient

73 Km 14/10 12.00 M Good --- ---
Culvert 1000mm ø Width

Others (Construction of Retaining Wall):

SI. NO Location Description Technically Approved by

Divisional Engineer,
1 Km 8/0 – 8/6 & Km 8/8 – 9/0 Construction of Breast Wall National Highways,
Madurai
Divisional Engineer,
2 Km 12/300 – 12/500 Construction of Retaining Wall National Highways,
Madurai
Sub Estimates:

1. Reconstruction of RCC Slab Culvert at Km 4/6 (ii).

2. Reconstruction of Single Row RCC Pipe Culvert at Km 5/2.

3. Reconstruction of Single Row RCC Pipe Culvert at Km 5/4.

4. Reconstruction of Two Row RCC Pipe Culvert at Km 6/2 (i).

5. Reconstruction of Single Row RCC Pipe Culvert at Km 6/2 (ii).

6. Reconstruction of Single Row RCC Pipe Culvert at Km 6/10 (ii).

7. Reconstruction of Single Row RCC Pipe Culvert at Km 7/4.

8. Reconstruction of Single Row RCC Pipe Culvert at Km 7/6 (i).

9. Reconstruction of RCC Slab Culvert at Km 7/6 (ii).

10. Reconstruction of Single Row RCC Pipe Culvert at Km 8/2.

11. Reconstruction of Two Row RCC Pipe Culvert at Km 9/6.

12. Reconstruction of Two Row RCC Pipe Culvert at Km 9/8.

13. Reconstruction of Single Row RCC Pipe Culvert at Km 11/6.

14. Reconstruction of RCC Slab Culvert at Km 12/4 (ii).

15. Reconstruction of RCC Slab Culvert at Km 13/10 (ii).

16. Construction of Breast Wall in Km 8/0 – 8/6 & Km 8/8 – 9/0.

17. Construction of Retaining Wall in Km 12/300 – 12/500.

 Provisions made in the Estimate:

1. Picking the existing bituminous surface in Km 0/0 – 9/4 as per Clause 501 of
MoRT & H Specification (Vth Revision)
2. Providing and Laying Granular Sub Base Grading – III of 150mm respectively for
Pipe Culvert Portions as per Table No.400 – 1 as per Clause 111, 112, 401 & 900
of MoRT & H Specification (Vth Revision)
3. Providing and Laying Granular Sub Base Grading – V of 240mm respectively for
Pipe Culvert Portions as per Table No.400 – 1 as per Clause 111, 112, 401 & 900
of MoRT & H Specification (Vth Revision
4. Providing and Laying Wet Mix Macadam of 200mm Thick in Km 0/0 – 9/4 as
per Clause 111, 112, 406 & 900 of MoRT & H Specification (Vth Revision)
5. Providing and Laying Prime Coat Over WMM Surface at the rate of 7.00 Kg per
10 Sqm in Km 0/0 – 9/4 using Emulsion [Slow Setting I] Grade Bitumen as per
Clause 111, 112, 501, 900 of MoRT & H Specification (Vth Revision)
6. Providing and Laying Tack Coat Over Primed WMM Surface at the rate of 2.50
Kgs per 10 Sqm in Km 0/0 – 9/4 using Emulsion R.S. I Grade Bitumen as per
Clause 111, 112, 501, 900 of MoRT & H Specification (Vth Revision)
7. Providing and Laying Tack Coat Over Existing Bituminous Surface at the rate
of 2.50 Kgs per 10 Sqm in Km 9/4 – 15/320 using Emulsion R.S. I Grade
Bitumen as per Clause 111, 112, 501, 900 of MoRT & H Specification (Vth
Revision)
8. Providing and Laying Dense Bituminous Macadam – Grading II 50 mm thick in
Km 0/0 - 15/320 using VG 30 grade bitumen as per Clause 507 of MoRT & H
Specification (Vth Revision)
9. Providing and Laying Bituminous Concrete – Grading II 30 mm thick in Km
0/0 - 15/320 using VG 30 grade bitumen as per Clause 508 of MoRT & H
Specification (Vth Revision)
10. Providing and Laying Side Earth for Making up Low Berms using available Box
Cutting Earth in Km 0/0 – 15/320 as per MoRT & H Specification.
 Lump sum Provisions Made in the Estimate:

1. Provision for Contingencies @ 3%.

2. Provision for Quality Control Charges @ 1%.
3. Provision for Quality assurance system, Monitoring, Training etc., @ 1%.
4. Provision for Petty Supervision Charges @ 0.50%.
5. Provision for Escalation Charges @ 3%.
6. Provision for Road Furniture.

Central Hot Mix Plant:

For estimate purpose the location of Central Hot Mix Plant is proposed at Km
1/10 of Thanichiyam - Seevagapatti Road.

Schedule of Rates:

The Schedule of Rates for the year 2017 – 2018 pertaining to Madurai District
is adopted in this estimate. On sanction of this work, it will be carried out as per
standard specification and other relevant specification from higher authority from
time to time.

Divisional Engineer Assistant Divisional Engineer Assistant Engineer

National Highways National Highways National Highways
Madurai Madurai Usilampatti