Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
VOLUME 2
(Pages 263 through 461, inclusive.)
Prepared BY:
Karen L. Kessler, RPR
Certified Reporter #50821
1 ALJ EIGENHEER: We are back on the record in 1 Q. Did you notice anything about her?
2 Docket No. 14A-019-POST. It is November 18, 2014, at 2 A. Initially, during the conversation, sounded to
3 approximately 8:32 a.m. 3 me like she may have had a cold. So when I saw her walk
4 Again, my name is Tina Eigenheer. I am the 4 into the building, I was holding the door open, I asked
5 Administrative Law Judge. And present today, starting 5 if she was okay, thinking she may have been ill. Looked
6 with POST. 6 like she was crying a little bit at that point, upset,
7 MS. BECK: Nancy Beck, Assistant Attorney 7 visibly upset. Asked if there was anything I could do.
8 General for POST. 8 She said no, she just needed to go into the restroom. I
9 MS. BAILLIE: Kathryn Baillie. I'm the attorney 9 didn't pry really any further. Let her into the
10 for the respondent, Kim Celaya. And my client, Kim 10 building and went and, then notified my, my supervisor
11 Celaya, is here as well. 11 who was already off shift at the time, but Lieutenant
12 ALJ EIGENHEER: Next witness. Or were there any 12 Singleton, just thinking something, obviously, was
13 preliminary? 13 upsetting lieutenant Celaya. She was there in plain
14 MS. BECK: No. 14 clothes. Didn't know what was going on, didn't really
15 ALJ EIGENHEER: Okay. Next witness then. 15 feel it was my place to pry as far as what was going on.
16 MS. BECK: Officer Joe Pinuelas. 16 Q. Is that everything you said to Lieutenant
17 (Officer Pinuelas was duly sworn by the 17 Singleton?
18 Administrative Law Judge.) 18 A. Pretty much, yes. I didn't really tell him, I
19 ALJ EIGENHEER: Would you please state your 19 didn't have a lot of info, other than Lieutenant Celaya
20 name, spelling it for the record? 20 arrived, needed to be let into the building, she looked
21 THE WITNESS: Joseph Pinuelas, P, as in Paul, 21 visibly upset. I didn't really know what was going on.
22 I-N-U-E-L-A-S. 22 Q. Was Lieutenant Celaya on duty at that time?
23 ALJ EIGENHEER: Okay. Please proceed. 23 A. No.
24 /// 24 Q. Were you there when Lieutenant Celaya came out
25 /// 25 of the building?
1 what did she say? 1 to her about, that was, at least, a peer of hers. But
2 A. She reassured me that, that her, her kids were 2 just reporting what I observed.
3 safe and, again, there was no one that I could call for 3 Q. Did Lieutenant Celaya appear in any way
4 her, and she was going to be fine. 4 intoxicated to you?
5 Q. Did she say anything else to you? 5 A. I didn't notice anything as far as intoxication
6 A. I, I, without maybe looking back, if there's 6 during that time.
7 something specific, I -- 7 MS. BECK: That's all. Thank you.
8 Q. Do you recall her saying anything about, asking 8 ALJ EIGENHEER: Cross?
9 whether she needed stitches or not? 9 MS. BAILLIE: Thank you.
10 A. Yes. She did ask about the, if it was still 10
11 bleeding, the cut was still bleeding. I said, no, it 11 CROSS-EXAMINATION
12 didn't look like it. She did ask about whether or not I 12 BY MS. BAILLIE:
13 thought it needed stitches. I can't remember what I 13 Q. Sergeant Pinuelas, you stated that you believe
14 replied. Probably would have needed some sort of 14 that Celaya, Lieutenant Celaya, was embarrassed,
15 stitching or, you know, it looked like it was a good 15 correct?
16 cut, but... 16 A. I believe that -- yeah. You know, I think that
17 Q. Did you think the she was asking you not to 17 she could have been embarrassed by the situation.
18 report the situation? 18 Q. So when you first get called -- you got called
19 MS. BAILLIE: Objection. That's very leading. 19 by dispatch, right?
20 ALJ EIGENHEER: You may answer the question. 20 A. Right.
21 THE WITNESS: I think that she was more 21 Q. Okay. And they asked you to come over and open
22 concerned with, with possibly being embarrassed by 22 up the training building for Lieutenant Celaya? Celaya,
23 anything. I didn't take it as if she was telling me not 23 excuse me.
24 to report. I already had in my mindset, obviously I was 24 A. They advised me that she needed to speak with me
25 going to notify my supervisor regardless. 25 on the telephone. So then they transferred her to my
1 talk about that later. So, so that she would have time 1 do you remember her telling you that she was going to go
2 to leave, or -- 2 ahead and handle it?
3 Q. So about 5:15 is when the dayshift begins? 3 A. I don't remember that, no.
4 A. 5:30 is briefing. 4 Q. Okay. Do you remember her, telling her that
5 Q. Okay. 5 everything was fine at home, her kids were fine, she was
6 A. Some officers arrive as early as 5:00, but it 6 okay?
7 just depends on the officers. 7 A. I remember that conversation, yes.
8 Q. Do they use the training building as briefing? 8 Q. Okay. Lieutenant Singleton was at home
9 A. Yes. 9 sleeping, right?
10 Q. Okay. So did you tell Lieutenant Singleton that 10 A. I wouldn't know.
11 you were going to hang out at the training building? 11 Q. Okay. Lieutenant Singleton had ended his
12 A. I don't recall telling him that. 12 shift --
13 Q. Did Lieutenant Singleton tell you to hang out 13 A. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Yes. Lieutenant
14 and wait for Kim? 14 Singleton was off shift.
15 A. I just, I think he said he would talk to her 15 Q. He was off shift?
16 later. 16 A. Right.
17 Q. Was that the first conversation you had with 17 Q. Okay. So when Kim told you you didn't need to
18 Lieutenant Singleton? 18 notify Lieutenant Singleton, did you tell her that you
19 A. Yes. 19 had already talked to Lieutenant Singleton?
20 Q. So Singleton told you that he would talk to Kim 20 A. No.
21 later? 21 Q. Is it possible that Kim asked you not to notify
22 A. I believe so. 22 because she knew that Singleton was off duty?
23 Q. Okay. But you decided to hang out at the 23 A. I wouldn't know that.
24 training building? 24 Q. Okay.
25 A. Yes. 25 A. Lieutenant Singleton, irregardless, was still
1 the watch commander, so... 1 A. I don't remember her saying that, no.
2 Q. Sure. Now, you usually call your lieutenant 2 Q. Okay. After you spoke with Lieutenant
3 when there's an emergency, right? 3 Singleton -- well, let me rephrase that.
4 A. Typically, yes. 4 After Kim left the training building, you spoke
5 Q. Okay. Because he's off shift? 5 to Lieutenant Singleton by phone?
6 A. Correct. 6 A. Correct.
7 Q. He's off duty. All right. So in this case it 7 Q. Okay. And in that conversation, Lieutenant
8 was not an emergency, though, right? 8 Singleton told you not to tell anybody, correct?
9 A. No. 9 A. I believe so.
10 Q. So did you call Lieutenant Singleton because you 10 Q. Okay. And that was an order, correct?
11 were, maybe, concerned for Kim? 11 A. That would have been more of an order, yes.
12 A. Absolutely. 12 MS. BAILLIE: All right. I have no further
13 Q. As a friend? 13 questions.
14 A. I don't know if I could say friend, because 14 ALJ EIGENHEER: Redirect?
15 there is that -- 15 MS. BECK: No.
16 Q. A coworker or -- 16 ALJ EIGENHEER: Thank you very much.
17 A. -- subordinate relationship. But definitely 17 MS. BECK: I'd like him to be reserved for
18 because I was concerned to see her in that condition at 18 rebuttal.
19 that time and place. So I felt that my supervisor 19 ALJ EIGENHEER: Okay.
20 needed to be aware. 20 MS. BECK: But he may leave for the day.
21 Q. She did not order you and say, you will not tell 21 ALJ EIGENHEER: Okay. Then your next witness.
22 anybody about this, did she? 22 MS. BECK: Lieutenant John Singleton.
23 A. No. There was no direct order. 23 ALJ EIGENHEER: Good morning.
24 Q. No. Okay. She thanked you for your 24 (John Singleton was duly sworn by the
25 confidentiality, right? 25 Administrative Law Judge.)
1 Q. On the evening of November 24, 2013, were you 1 She was getting them ready to go somewhere, I don't know
2 contacted by anyone concerning Kim Celaya? 2 if it was school or someplace else, but she couldn't
3 A. It would have been in the morning that I was 3 speak right then.
4 contacted. 4 Q. About what time was that?
5 Q. In the morning? 5 A. Gosh, I'm guessing. I usually get up sometime
6 A. Yeah. It would have been Sunday morning, I 6 around 11:30, 12:00, 12:30, so it was probably, maybe,
7 believe. Yes, ma'am. At about 5 o'clock in the 7 12:30, 1 o'clock I had gotten my coffee and sat down,
8 morning. 8 somewhere around there. It was around noon, around
9 Q. Who contacted you? 9 noon-ish. That's the best I can give you. And she said
10 A. Joe Pinuelas. 10 she couldn't speak right then and, but she would call me
11 Q. What did he say? 11 back. And I said, well it's really important you call
12 A. He indicated that -- I actually received two 12 me, and she said she would. And I don't know how long
13 phone calls from him. The first phone call said that he 13 it was, it wasn't all that long, maybe an hour or so,
14 had been called by dispatch to respond to the training 14 hour and a half that she called me back, and we spoke.
15 building and let in Lieutenant Celaya. He responded 15 Q. Tell us about that conversation.
16 there, let her into the building. And he says, she 16 A. Well, I told her that I had gotten a call from
17 walked right by him, and it seemed as though she was 17 Sergeant Pinuelas, and Sergeant Pinuelas was very
18 crying and very upset. So I said, okay, what's wrong. 18 concerned about her and now I was concerned, and was
19 And he said, I don't know she went into the bathroom. 19 everything okay. And her first statement was, this is
20 He said that he was going to check reports and stay in 20 just stupid, this is just stupid. And I said, well,
21 the training building and see if he could assist her 21 what happened? And she didn't really answer me right
22 when she came out. And I said, that's good, let me 22 away. She was -- obviously, I could here in her voice
23 know. 23 that she was very upset, she was very distraught.
24 And that was the end of that conversation. I 24 So I, I was calling her as a friend. I wasn't
25 went back to sleep for about 10 minutes, 15 minutes, and 25 calling her as a, really as a peer, and I'm certainly
1 then he called me back -- it was probably 15 minutes -- 1 not her supervisor, so I wanted to be supportive, and so
2 he call me back, said that she had left the bathroom, 2 I didn't want to push her too much, but I wanted to find
3 and what he thought was mascara from crying, he says he 3 out what was wrong. And I think I asked her, are you
4 realized that was a cut under her eye. And I asked if 4 okay? I had asked her that when she first called me and
5 she was okay, and he said, yeah, she says she's okay, 5 said that she couldn't speak. My concern was if she had
6 she wouldn't tell him how it happened, and, but that she 6 some involvement with somebody that was of violent
7 was okay and that she was going to go home. And I said, 7 engagement, was that person there and that's why she
8 we have no idea what happened, what went on? And he 8 couldn't talk to me. So I was concerned about that, and
9 says, no, he says that she's going home. And he was 9 she assured me at that time that she was safe. On this
10 very concerned for her. He says he asked about her 10 conversation, she also said she was okay, that she was
11 kids, is everything okay at home, yeah, the kids are 11 fine but it was just, just not a good thing for her.
12 fine, I'm fine, I'm just going to go home and go to bed. 12 That she was very, very distraught and very upset about,
13 So I asked him is she still there, and he said, 13 about what was going on, about what had happened.
14 no, she's already left. So I said, okay. I verified 14 Q. Did she tell you anything more?
15 from him that she was safe, that her kids were safe, and 15 A. She was obviously very reluctant, and my feeling
16 that everything was going to be okay. I was exhausted 16 was that she was embarrassed. That was the sense that I
17 from working all night. I assumed that she was probably 17 got, she was very embarrassed about the situation and
18 tired and wanted to sleep, since that's what she had 18 really didn't want to share a whole lot. She and I -- I
19 apparently told him, so I went ahead and went to sleep 19 consider her my friend, but a work friend. We didn't
20 with the plan of contacting her when I woke up. 20 socialize off work, but she was somebody that I worked
21 Q. What happened next? 21 with occasionally on Tuesday nights, had a good rapport
22 A. When I woke up? 22 with her. So I, you know, I was very concerned.
23 Q. Yes. 23 She, she just, she was very hesitant to talk to
24 A. I called her cell phone. She answered. She 24 me, and I don't know if it was she just didn't know me
25 indicated that she was with her children at the time. 25 that well or what the situation was, but she just didn't
1 want to say what was going on. She finally, after some 1 the boss.
2 period of time, she was, she was having bouts of being 2 Q. And who's her boss?
3 very, very upset and crying, and she would gather her -- 3 A. It would have been -- well, I don't know that I
4 she would collect herself and gather herself, and she 4 even -- I think I might have told her Deputy Chief
5 finally, she finally just told me, she said, well, 5 Rogers. But she never said she was not going to. She
6 basically what happened was -- I knew that her and her 6 wasn't -- it seemed to me that when I was talking to
7 boyfriend had split up. I knew that they weren't 7 her, her mind was kind of somewhere else. So she wasn't
8 together, or at least that's what she said, that they 8 always answering me when I would say something. I know
9 weren't seeing each other anymore. 9 there was a lot going on with her right then, and she
10 She said that they had received a call from some 10 was just very, very upset. She had a lot of, a lot of
11 friends -- and I'm sorry, I don't remember -- they were 11 personal issues that had gone on outside of this issue,
12 from out of state. That's all I know. I don't know 12 with the loss of a loved one, and I just felt like that
13 what state they're from. But these friends had called 13 was, you know, she was very distracted when I was
14 and said they would like to get together with them. And 14 talking to her.
15 Kim had indicated that she felt that they could be civil 15 So I said it a few times that, you know, you
16 with each other for one night. They go out and, and 16 need to call, and she never, she didn't really respond
17 have a good time with these friends and that would be 17 at first. I finally told her -- I used what's, what we
18 it; there wouldn't be anything more to it than that. 18 call as a bait, either a baited question or a baited
19 And she said that, while in the car, they had a 19 statement, and I basically told her, I said, hey look,
20 verbal argument. And she never really told me who the, 20 if you don't want to say anything, I won't say anything,
21 who he was, but I assumed it was her ex-boyfriend. She 21 because I wanted to see what her mindset was. I wanted
22 never told me it was Al. But she said they had a verb 22 to see what she was going to say. And immediately, she
23 -- they were having a verbal argument and he reached 23 says, oh, no, I'm going to report it. So at that point
24 over and punched her in the face. And she said that 24 I knew absolutely she is going, she is going to tell the
25 after that -- I said, well, what did you do, and she 25 boss.
1 said I started kicking him. And I said, okay. 1 And then at that point, I was trying to convince
2 And at that point I was really upset. So I told 2 her that she really needed to make a police report. In
3 her that, you know, we needed to do something with this. 3 my mind, she was clearly a victim of domestic violence
4 We need to, we needed to get a police report. We 4 and this needed to be reported. And she didn't want to
5 needed, she needed to report this, and she didn't want 5 do that. I asked her why, and she said, look, even
6 to do that. She didn't want to make a police report. 6 though the relationship is over, even though we're not
7 Q. Anything more about the conversation you can 7 going to see each other anymore, she still has feelings
8 think of? 8 for him, she still, you know, has a history with him and
9 A. At that point, no, not really. There was, there 9 did not want to testify against him in court.
10 was very little detail. And I tried to push her for 10 Q. Deputy Chief Rogers' first name is Jeff?
11 some more detail, and I finally sort of, it dawned on me 11 A. Yes.
12 that because she didn't want to make a police report, 12 Q. When you told her to call Jeff, did you say
13 that's why she was being kind of distant about what 13 anything about the chief?
14 happened. In domestic violence issues, a lot of times 14 A. She, Kim had not been with us all that long.
15 victims don't want to make a report. And I think, I 15 She had been with the department, I think, a couple of
16 think, it's just my feeling, I'm speculating, that she 16 years. She was very new to our patrol. She's an
17 felt that we were going to, if she told me this 17 experienced officer, came from other agencies, but she
18 information, we were going to make a police report 18 was new to patrol. She had just been reassigned to
19 without her consent. That was the feeling I got from 19 patrol. So I don't think she really knew Deputy Chief
20 the conversation. She never said that, but that was the 20 Rogers very well, and she indicated to me, not in a
21 feeling I got. 21 negative way, but she indicated to me that she didn't
22 Q. Did you have any conversation with her about her 22 really know Deputy Chief Rogers, and wasn't sure she had
23 contacting anyone else? 23 full trust in him. I understood that completely. She
24 A. As far as? Oh, I, yeah, I told her that she 24 said, but she did know Jerry, referring to Chief Geier,
25 needed to talk to her boss, she needed to report it to 25 and that she would call him.
1 this, and this is just purely my take on it, I took it 1 A. Yes, I was.
2 that this was going to be a huge distraction for her 2 Q. Where?
3 that she didn't need. 3 A. I did a, I went through the academy in 2001,
4 Q. Okay. Along with everything else, personally, 4 sponsored by the Youngtown Police Department. And upon
5 that was going on in her life? 5 graduation, was hired by the El Mirage Police
6 A. Right. 6 Department, and worked there February of 2002 until I
7 Q. Now, Kim had just moved up from Yuma, right? 7 started with Goodyear.
8 A. I -- 8 Q. In November of 2013 what was your role in the
9 Q. About a year? Or actually, yeah -- 9 police department?
10 A. You know -- 10 A. I was assigned, and still am assigned, to the
11 Q. -- about six months -- 11 professional standards unit.
12 A. -- I thought she had been there a couple of 12 Q. Is that colloquially known as internal affairs?
13 years. 13 A. Yes, it is.
14 Q. So, you don't know the time frame? 14 Q. Did you have occasion to conduct an
15 A. I know she had come from Yuma at some point. 15 investigation concerning Lieutenant Kim Celaya?
16 Q. Okay. 16 A. Yes, I did.
17 A. I don't know when. 17 Q. How did that matter come to your attention?
18 MS. BAILLIE: I have no further questions. 18 A. I believe I was actually contacted by the chief
19 ALJ EIGENHEER: Redirect? 19 of police, Jerry Geier, a phone call. From what I
20 MS. BECK: No. Nothing further. 20 recall, it was on a weekend. He had called just to give
21 ALJ EIGENHEER: You may step down. Reserve for 21 me a brief synopsis of the information that he had.
22 rebuttal? 22 Q. What information did he give you?
23 MS. BECK: He's reserved for rebuttal. 23 A. He didn't have a lot at the time. I believe he
24 THE WITNESS: Would you like me to remain here? 24 was out of state, and our deputy chief, Jeff Rogers, I
25 MS. BECK: Not for today. 25 believe was the one that was actually initially dealing
1 THE WITNESS: Okay. Thank you. 1 with this incident. So there wasn't a lot said on the
2 MS. BAILLIE: Thank you very much. 2 weekend. It was more of, hey, we need to meet first
3 Your next witness? 3 thing on Monday morning.
4 MS. BECK: Sergeant Justin Hughes. 4 So it was, just briefly, that Lieutenant Celaya
5 ALJ EIGENHEER: Good morning. Have a seat. 5 had been involved in an off-duty incident where there
6 (Justin Hughes was duly sworn by the 6 was, a possible assault had occurred. But, again, the
7 Administrative Law Judge.) 7 information, from what I recall, was just very vague,
8 ALJ EIGENHEER: Would you please state your 8 because the chief was out of the state at the time.
9 name, spelling it for the record? 9 Q. Was an internal affairs investigation opened?
10 THE WITNESS: Justin Hughes, J-U-S-T-I-N. My 10 A. Yes, it was.
11 last name is Hughes, H-U-G-H-E-S. 11 Q. How did that come about?
12 ALJ EIGENHEER: Please proceed. 12 A. At the request, or direction, of the chief of
13 13 police.
14 JUSTIN HUGHES, 14 Q. And I'd like you to look in the green book,
15 a witness herein, having been previously sworn by the 15 Exhibit 4. This is, this document is in evidence but,
16 Administrative Law Judge to speak the truth and nothing 16 for the record, could you explain what this is?
17 but the truth, was examined and testified as follows: 17 A. This is our, and it's called or administrative,
18 18 or final copy is what we refer to it as, this is the
19 DIRECT EXAMINATION 19 report that myself and my partner generate on each
20 BY MS. BECK: 20 internal investigation. This is the format. So this is
21 Q. Sergeant Hughes, where you employed? 21 a report that goes to the chief of police for review.
22 A. Goodyear Police Department. 22 Q. And did you work with anyone else in
23 Q. How long have you been with Goodyear? 23 professional standards concerning this investigation?
24 A. I started with Goodyear in April of 2006. 24 A. Yes. Sergeant Joe Pacello.
25 Q. Were you a police officer before that time? 25 Q. P-A-C-E-L-L-O?
1 A. Correct. 1 Chief Rogers, which would indicate that there was some
2 Q. And who actually wrote this report? 2 time delay between the time that the text messages
3 A. We both actually contributed to this report. 3 between Lieutenant Celaya and Chief Geier and when they
4 Q. Okay. Would you look at Exhibit 5, please, Tab 4 actually talked on the phone, during that time that she
5 5. The second page shows Professional Standards Unit, 5 had already met with Deputy Chief Rogers.
6 and then the page that's No. 2, which is actually the 6 Q. At the time of this incident, who was Lieutenant
7 third page, shows, Findings/Summary of Event Section 2. 7 Celaya's superior?
8 What's the difference between Exhibit 4 and 5? 8 A. Deputy Chief Rogers.
9 A. This copy, Exhibit 5 is what is presented to 9 Q. Okay. What information did Deputy Chief Rogers
10 AZ POST. We don't send, initially, all interviews or 10 give you in that meeting?
11 all attachments. If those are requested later, this is 11 A. Do you want this from memory, or do you want me
12 just a summary of findings that are presented to AZ 12 to refer to this?
13 POST, and we also create, almost a duplicate 13 Q. You may refer to it if you need to to supplement
14 presentation to the Maricopa County Attorney's office. 14 your memory.
15 Q. Did AZ POST eventually request all your records 15 A. Okay. She had indicated that she had gone out
16 in this investigation? 16 with some friends the previous evening, including -- and
17 A. Yes, they did. 17 at the time I don't recall if she referred to Mr. Al
18 Q. Using Exhibit 4, I'd like you to walk us through 18 Beard, if it was her boyfriend or was a previous
19 the investigation and tell us who you interviewed. 19 boyfriend, but they had gone out. There was some type
20 A. Who I personally interviewed? 20 of altercation that occurred, and during that incident,
21 Q. Let's start at Exhibit 4, page three. It begins 21 Al had struck Lieutenant Celaya in the face.
22 there, on the morning of November 25, 2013, you 22 And I do recall Deputy Chief Rogers indicating
23 requested to meet. 23 that he could see that she did have visible injury to
24 Tell us about that meeting. 24 her cheek, like approximately below her eye.
25 A. Can I take a minute just to review this? 25 Q. Did Lieutenant Celaya ask to meet with Deputy
1 Deputy Chief Rogers in terms of who hit who first? 1 Q. Did she get medical treatment?
2 A. And I'm referring to the report. Lieutenant 2 A. She did not get treatment. She went in and was,
3 Celaya hit Al on the arm one time during a verbal 3 was, did not go to triage, I believe she went in and
4 argument. Al made the statement of not being hit again 4 spoke to a hospital, I don't know if it was a greeter or
5 or else. Lieutenant Celaya proceeded to hit him on the 5 check-in person, but was given a Steri-Strip and, I
6 arm again, at which time he stopped the vehicle. They 6 believe, iodine, but was not actually seen by a, I
7 were actually driving down the roadway while this 7 believe a medical professional.
8 altercation was occurring. Al was driving. He stopped 8 Q. Continuing on in this report.
9 the vehicle, turned and then struck Lieutenant Celaya in 9 Deputy Chief Rogers and Lieutenant Celaya went
10 the face. 10 back to the administration building?
11 So referring to this, based on this information, 11 A. Correct.
12 Lieutenant Celaya had, told Deputy Chief Rogers that she 12 Q. And then what conversation did they have
13 had hit him on the arm twice and then he struck her, Al, 13 concerning investigation by an outside law enforcement
14 struck Lieutenant Celaya in the face. 14 agency?
15 Q. Did she provide any information to the deputy 15 A. Based on the information that Lieutenant Celaya
16 chief about her kicking Al? 16 gave to Deputy Chief Rogers, and him recognizing that
17 A. No. 17 there was, at the time, recognizing that an assault had
18 Q. Did you later gain any information from the 18 occurred, he recognized the obligation of there being a
19 other three witnesses concerning kicking? 19 criminal investigation, with this incident being
20 A. Yes, we did. 20 domestic violence related. And, typically, our agency,
21 Q. What was that information? 21 on a criminal case, we will not do our own
22 A. Do you want me to break it down by individual 22 investigation. We will branch it out to another agency.
23 person or just in general? 23 So he contacted the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office.
24 Q. I'd like you to, at this point, just give me a 24 Q. And what happened?
25 summary. 25 A. I believe two detectives from MCSO arrived. My
1 A. Okay. During the interviews with, with Wayne 1 understanding is that Deputy Chief Rogers recused
2 Bearden, Keila Mincey, and Al, the one corroborating 2 himself out so he was not present while Lieutenant
3 event was that all three were very clear that during 3 Celaya was meeting with the two detectives. And that
4 this altercation in the vehicle, as Al was driving, that 4 was Lieutenant Celaya's opportunity to meet with them
5 prior to Al stopping the vehicle, turning and striking 5 and, I guess, give details on what occurred.
6 Lieutenant Celaya in the face, that Lieutenant Celaya 6 Q. And did she give details on what occurred?
7 had kicked him in the head, or in that area, neck area, 7 A. No. I don't -- I think she was hesitant on
8 at least once, some witnesses said it was actually even 8 wanting to cooperate with the investigation. I believe
9 more than once, prior to him stopping the vehicle, 9 that they took photographs. She gave Al's name and, I
10 turning, and then striking her in the face. 10 believe, where he lived, or at least gave a general
11 Q. Continuing on with Exhibit 4, page four. You're 11 location, but she did not want to give a statement.
12 continuing to tell here what deputy Chief Rogers 12 Q. She didn't give a statement about the event?
13 provided you, the information he provided you. 13 A. Correct.
14 A. Okay. 14 Q. Did Deputy Chief Rogers receive a call from
15 Q. Is that where we are? 15 Lieutenant Singleton?
16 A. Yes. 16 A. Yes.
17 Q. Okay. What does Lieutenant Celaya tell him in 17 Q. Did he receive any additional information that
18 terms of going to the emergency room? 18 Lieutenant Celaya had not provided him?
19 A. She had mentioned to him that after the strike, 19 A. Yes, he did.
20 after her being struck in the face by Al, Al had turned, 20 Q. Can you summarize that?
21 she got out of the vehicle, walked away from the 21 A. I'm just going to review this real quick.
22 vehicle. At about 0400 hours, so 4 o'clock in the 22 Q. Sure.
23 morning -- and I believe, just to make sure my dates are 23 A. When he spoke to Lieutenant Singleton, Deputy
24 right, I believe that's the 24th of November -- she, she 24 Chief Rogers learned that Lieutenant Celaya had actually
25 went to West Valley Hospital. 25 arrived to the Goodyear Police Department training
1 building, I believe it was between 4:30 and 5 o'clock, 1 involving all the specifics, did she have a lengthy
2 on that morning of the 24th. And she had requested, 2 discussion involving all the specifics with anyone?
3 either through dispatch or contacting the on-duty 3 A. As far as the length of the conversation, I
4 supervisor directly, who was at the time Sergeant 4 don't know how long it was, but the specifics, based on
5 Pinuelas, to allow her to have, or to give her access to 5 what we learned through this investigation, no. This
6 get into the building. I don't think she had her 6 was just a very small portion of what actually occurred.
7 keycard -- our buildings are operated by a magnetic 7 Q. Who did you interview next? Back on Exhibit 4,
8 keycard, and I don't think she had her keycard at the 8 page seven.
9 time. So Sergeant Pinuelas arrived to allow her access 9 A. Lieutenant Celaya.
10 into the building. 10 Q. And what was the date of that interview?
11 Q. I'd like you to walk through this, and you tell 11 A. November 26th.
12 us who you interviewed here. Starting on page five. 12 Q. We will come back to the specifics of that, but
13 Who did you interview first? 13 I want to continue to walk through your interviews.
14 A. Lieutenant Singleton. 14 On page 12, who did you interview next?
15 Q. On page seven, you refer to an email received 15 A. That was Mr. Beard, Alvin Beard.
16 from Deputy Chief Marzocca? 16 Q. Let me back up a minute.
17 A. Correct. 17 After the Maricopa County Sheriff's Deputies
18 Q. And what is that? 18 talked to Lieutenant Celaya and she declined to give a
19 A. It's a, this was an email that was sent, or 19 statement, did they make an attempt to get a statement
20 authored by Lieutenant Celaya to Deputy Chief Marzocca, 20 from anyone else?
21 I think just making notification of the incident that 21 A. They did. They dove to the residence where
22 had occurred. I don't want to speculate as to why this 22 Mr. Beard was staying. That's the residence of Keila
23 was done, but my belief is that when we're involved in 23 and Wayne. And they did contact Mr. Beard, but he did
24 an off-duty incident, typically that's how we make 24 not, he was not willing to give a statement.
25 notification, we can write a memo, send an email, but 25 Q. Okay. On page 15, who did you interview next?
1 Suites, which is at 15575 West Roosevelt. It is on the 1 Q. Page 35, who did you interview next?
2 west side of the road. So I know that they have cameras 2 A. Alliyah Beard, and that is the daughter of Alvin
3 on the outside, so we were conducting follow up to see 3 Beard.
4 if any of the cameras were pointed in an area that may 4 Q. Why did you interview her?
5 pick up this altercation. 5 A. One of the discrepancies in our interviews with
6 Q. Did you find anything? 6 Lieutenant Celaya was the chain of events that occurred
7 A. No. There was nothing of value that we located. 7 after she had -- after the incident in the vehicle, she
8 Q. Did you also go to the Roman's Oasis Bar in 8 had walked home. Lieutenant Celaya indicated that she
9 Goodyear? 9 went directly upstairs, Keila went upstairs with her.
10 A. Yes, we did. 10 Lieutenant Celaya indicated that she got cleaned off,
11 Q. What was your purpose in going? 11 cleaned herself up, and everyone left the residence,
12 A. To get, again, to see if there was either 12 including Keila. After a while, Lieutenant Celaya said
13 witness or video evidence that, that could help us in 13 she left the residence by herself and drove her
14 this investigation. And we were able to get video 14 daughter's vehicle directly to West Valley Hospital.
15 surveillance of the inside of the bar. Where the camera 15 When we interviewed Keila, she said that that
16 was positioned was pretty much right next to where 16 wasn't accurate. That she actually did walk upstairs
17 Lieutenant Celaya and the other people involved in her 17 with Lieutenant Celaya, and then when Al and everyone
18 party were at at the bar. 18 else had left the residence, both Keila and Lieutenant
19 Q. Did you observe Al as he was finishing his 19 Celaya left together with the, I believe, the intention
20 drinks and getting ready to leave? 20 of going to West Valley Hospital, but instead,
21 A. Yes. 21 Lieutenant Celaya drove over to her residence where Al
22 Q. And did you, at any time, see Al slam a drink 22 was at.
23 down? 23 So we were trying to determine which version was
24 A. No, he did not. 24 correct. We, my partner and I, knew that Alliyah was
25 Q. On page 26, who did you interview next? 25 there babysitting that night. She was not directly
1 A. Yes, it does. It compels them that they do need 1 Q. It's a summary, not a transcript?
2 to answer truthfully in the internal investigation. 2 A. Correct.
3 Q. Looking at the little paragraph that explains 3 Q. Why didn't you transcribe it?
4 what her conduct is. The last, the last phrase, 4 A. The -- our interview with Ms., with Alliyah
5 ultimately, would you read after the word ultimately? 5 Beard was specific to one incident. We were trying to
6 A. Ultimately culminated into a physical 6 determine corroboration, either corroborating with
7 altercation in which you struck Alvin Beard several 7 Lieutenant Celaya's version or corroborating with the
8 times inside of a vehicle while near Estrella Parkway in 8 witnesses. It was a short interview, so a short
9 the City of Goodyear. 9 recording. I think the interview lasted maybe 10 to
10 Q. And Exhibit 7, is this your December 2nd, 2013, 10 15 minutes at most. So there really wasn't a need to do
11 interview with Kim Celaya? 11 a complete transcription.
12 A. That is correct. 12 Q. Turning to the second page of that summary,
13 Q. And turning to the last two pages, what are the 13 third paragraph down, Alliyah stated.
14 last two pages? 14 A. Alliyah stated she initially found out about
15 A. This is the amended notice of interview. This 15 what occurred was from Keila and that she was trying
16 was served to Lieutenant Celaya before the second 16 stop it. Alliyah stated that her dad also told her
17 interview commenced with the additional allegations. 17 about it and told her that Kim had kicked him first and
18 Q. Could you summarize the additional allegations? 18 that he hit her to stop her from kicking him.
19 A. Summarize or read them? 19 Q. That's what Alliyah told you?
20 Q. No. I'd like you to read me the opening 20 A. Yes.
21 paragraph there. 21 Q. Exhibit 16, please, same book. What is this?
22 A. Okay. 22 A. This is a memorandum authored by Deputy Chief
23 It is alleged that during your interview with 23 Rogers in regards to his initial meeting with Lieutenant
24 PSU investigators on Tuesday November 26, 2013, you gave 24 Celaya.
25 false or misleading or misrepresented information and/or 25 Q. And what date did he write it?
1 head, slash, neck, at least three times resulting in 1 there for several hours, and then the four of them drove
2 injury to Mr. Beard, during which time another passenger 2 together, with Al being the driver, driving Lieutenant
3 in the vehicle wrestled to restrain her. 3 Celaya's vehicle, to Chandler.
4 Q. When the chief made the final decision on this 4 And again, the, based on the chief's wording
5 case, did he exonerate Lieutenant Celaya on several of 5 here:
6 the allegations? 6 When questioned during your second interview,
7 A. Yes, he did. 7 you admitted that your initial information was
8 Q. Okay. Turning to page two of Exhibit 19. What 8 inaccurate. I can understand how you may have
9 are the items for which he exonerated her? 9 misinterpreted this question.
10 A. Amended findings for Allegation 1 and 2. 10 Q. Turning to page three. Was the 4th allegation
11 Q. Can you summarize? 11 sustained?
12 A. Yes. And when we conducted our interview with 12 A. Yes.
13 Lieutenant Celaya, our initial interview, one of the 13 Q. And can you summarize the allegation?
14 questions we asked Lieutenant Celaya is when did your 14 A. During our interview, one of the questions we
15 evening start. She stated that her evening started when 15 asked Lieutenant Celaya was how many alcoholic beverages
16 she picked up Al, Wayne, and Keila, and they drove to 16 she had consumed that evening. During the first
17 the bar, a bar in Chandler, I believe around 10:00 or 17 interview, her initial answer to that was four. When we
18 11:00 p.m. During our investigation, we learned that 18 determined that that was not accurate, that it was
19 the evening actually didn't start there, but it actually 19 actually nine to 10 beverages that she had consumed,
20 had started around 6:00 p.m. that evening at Majerle's 20 there was a definite discrepancy in those two answers.
21 Sports Bar and Grill, which is in the city of Goodyear. 21 Q. Did you regard that to be a significant
22 Do you want me to read why there was an 22 discrepancy?
23 exoneration, or what -- 23 A. Yes.
24 Q. No. Summarize it. 24 Q. Explain.
25 A. I believe the exoneration was interpretation -- 25 A. We felt that in this incident alcohol played a
1 significant role in the behavior, and during the time 1 video, at the time he is leaving, where he actually
2 frame of when the evening started to when this incident 2 takes his final drink and sets his glass on the counter
3 actually occurred, the difference between a person 3 and kind of slides it forward, her back is actually to
4 consuming four alcoholic beverages and consuming nine to 4 him.
5 10 alcoholic beverages would be significant in one's 5 Q. What is the significance of her saying Al
6 decision making abilities. 6 slammed his drink down?
7 Q. The 5th and 6th allegations were sustained? 7 A. It's not accurate. I mean, it didn't occur that
8 A. Correct. 8 way. The significance of that statement, I don't know.
9 Q. And what do those regard? 9 But I can -- the significance is that that event did not
10 A. During the interview with Lieutenant Celaya, she 10 occur.
11 indicated from the time that she and the other members 11 Q. Does it portray Al in a certain manner?
12 in her party had left Chandler to drive back to Goodyear 12 A. It portrays him angry and, maybe, things leading
13 that nothing had occurred during that vehicle ride, 13 up outside because of his anger. But the witnesses give
14 which I'm assuming is approximately about an hour. Yet 14 us a different account of what occurred, that he wasn't
15 witnesses were very clear that Lieutenant Celaya was 15 angry, and that, it was evident that he did not slam his
16 disruptive and disorderly in the vehicle. That's what 16 glass.
17 that allegation was in reference to. 17 Q. On page three, still on Exhibit 19,
18 Q. Did you regard that as a significant omission on 18 Allegation/Count 8. Actually, would you read that,
19 her part? 19 please?
20 A. Yes. 20 A. Lieutenant Celaya stated during the interview on
21 Q. Explain. 21 November 26th and December 2nd, 2013, that she struck
22 A. Based on the witness information, Lieutenant 22 Alvin Beard twice in the arm, he punched her in the
23 Celaya not only was disorderly and disruptive, but that 23 face, and then she kicked him in the head one time;
24 was a, somewhat of a precursor that started things that 24 when, in fact, witnesses informed PSU that Lieutenant
25 evening. There was a verbal altercation that occurred 25 Celaya struck Alvin Beard in the arm, after which Alvin
1 in the vehicle; there was mentioning of, of Al being 1 Beard then told Lieutenant Celaya not to hit him again.
2 either smacked in the arm or in the face by Lieutenant 2 Lieutenant Celaya then struck him in the arm again, and
3 Celaya, there was cursing, yelling going back and forth. 3 while a passenger tried to restrain her, she kicked
4 And so that added to, to the culmination of events at 4 Alvin Beard in the head/neck three times, at which point
5 the end of the evening. 5 Alvin Beard stopped the vehicle in the middle of the
6 Q. Allegation 7 was sustained, correct? 6 road and struck her once in the face. In response,
7 A. Yes. 7 Lieutenant Celaya kicked Alvin Beard in the head/neck a
8 Q. And summarize that allegation. 8 fourth time. Lieutenant Celaya admitted during her
9 A. During our interview with Lieutenant Celaya, she 9 second interview on December 2nd that she struck Alvin
10 indicated that, while at the Roman's Oasis bar, which 10 Beard twice and then kicked him in the head only after
11 was the last location they were at in Goodyear, that, 11 he struck her in the face.
12 that Al was upset at Lieutenant Celaya and had slammed a 12 Q. Was Lieutenant Celaya dishonest in her
13 beverage, or a glass, on the bar counter and stormed out 13 November 26th and December 2nd interview?
14 of the bar. This was not corroborated initially by 14 A. Yes.
15 witness statements, those being Al and Wayne, I'm sorry, 15 Q. About those matters?
16 Keila and Wayne. But when we were able to obtain video 16 A. Yes, she was.
17 surveillance of the inside of the bar, I had mentioned 17 Q. Allegations 9, 10, and 11, can you summarize?
18 earlier that the video camera position was in an area 18 A. This was what I referenced earlier, why we
19 almost directly, I believe, above or to the side of 19 conducted an interview with Alliyah. There was a
20 where Lieutenant Celaya and her party were at at the 20 discrepancy -- Lieutenant Celaya indicated that after
21 bar, where you could clearly see Al and his movement, 21 she had walked home, everyone had left her residence and
22 and at no point, or any time, is he observed to be 22 she drove herself to West Valley Hospital; when, in
23 slamming a glass and storming out. And, in fact, 23 fact, Keila and the other witnesses stated that Keila
24 Lieutenant Celaya said, not only did she hear it, but 24 stayed at the residence and actually left with
25 she actually watched him slam his glass. And in the 25 Lieutenant Celaya, which was corroborated by Alliyah
1 Q. And the next? 1 determine if that officer is, if their actions, based on
2 A. It was found that on November 24th, 2013, 2 our investigation, should be disclosed to defense.
3 Lieutenant Celaya, while off duty, committed the 3 And so there's a database that's maintained at
4 misdemeanor offense of disorderly conduct, domestic 4 the County Attorney's Office that, should Lieutenant
5 violence by intentionally disturbing the peace or quiet 5 Celaya have to be subpoenaed on a criminal case, the
6 of another, by engaging in fighting, violent or 6 prosecution has, must supply that information to defense
7 seriously disruptive behavior, or making unreasonable 7 should there be exculpatory or impeachment evidence
8 noise or using abusive or offensive language or gestures 8 based on prior conduct on the officer.
9 to any person present in a manner likely to provoke 9 Q. Thank you. I'd like to go back to your
10 immediate physical retaliation by such person. 10 interview of Al, Wayne, and Keila. Where did you
11 Q. And were those allegations of criminal conduct 11 interview them?
12 sustained? 12 A. At Wayne and Keila's residence.
13 A. Yes, they were. 13 Q. When you interviewed Al, where were the others?
14 Q. What happened to Lieutenant Celaya at the police 14 A. In a bedroom. I believe, in fact, I believe
15 department? What was the outcome of this case? 15 Keila was outside with her children, and Wayne was in a
16 A. She was terminated. 16 back bedroom.
17 Q. Did she appeal the termination? 17 Q. When you were interviewing Al, could Keila and
18 A. No, she did not. 18 Wayne hear the interview?
19 Q. Exhibit 20. What is this? 19 A. No.
20 A. This is the incident report that the, when 20 Q. When you interviewed Keila, could Al and Wayne
21 Deputy Chief Rogers had called MCSO, the two detectives 21 hear the interview?
22 that came out, this is their report. 22 A. No.
23 Q. On page two of two, next to last paragraph, it 23 Q. When you interviewed Wayne, could Keila and Al
24 should be noted. Would you read that? 24 hear the interview?
25 A. It should be noted on the domestic violence 25 A. No.
1 Q. After you conducted those inter -- oh, when you 1 to speak, getting in trouble. But we were very clear
2 arrived at the residence, who was with you? 2 that we were there to investigate policy violations. We
3 A. My partner, Joe Pacello. 3 also were very clear that we don't, my partner and I
4 Q. And what did you -- who came to the door? 4 don't, determine discipline. We explained that we do
5 A. Initially? 5 the internal investigation. Again, that we don't share
6 Q. Yes. 6 with criminal, so regardless of what they told us, there
7 A. Oh -- 7 was nothing that would be told a criminal investigator.
8 Q. If you remember. 8 And we prepare a report that goes to our chief, and our
9 A. I don't, I don't recall who answered the door. 9 chief is the one that ultimately determines whatever --
10 I do, I do recall that my partner had met Al on a few 10 if or if there is not going to be discipline.
11 prior occasions. I don't know if they had worked out 11 Q. Anything else in the introductions that you can
12 together. I don't know the circumstances. But I think 12 remember?
13 I had only me Al on one prior occasion. It was just in 13 A. Nothing specific that I can recall.
14 passing, meeting him, shaking his hand. I did not have 14 Q. Al was staying with Keila and Wayne from the
15 a rapport with him, so we felt, my partner and I felt, 15 time this event happened until the time you were
16 it was best that Sergeant Pacello kind of take the lead, 16 interviewed, correct? Al was staying at Keila's house.
17 so to speak, break the ice. So he actually met with -- 17 A. I believe so, yes.
18 when Al came to the door -- and I don't know if Al came 18 Q. Did you make any assumptions about whether they
19 to the door initially or if it was Wayne and Keila and 19 would have talked about the events or not before you
20 they got Al, it was my partner that initially was 20 interviewed them?
21 speaking with Al as to why we were there. 21 A. Well, living in the same house, I would imagine
22 Q. And were both you and Sergeant Pacello present 22 that this was a, probably a hot topic for at least a day
23 when you spoke to all of them? 23 or two. So I would, I don't want to assume, but I would
24 A. Yes. 24 guess that, since they're living in the same house,
25 Q. Were the three of them together when you gave 25 there is probably going to be some talk about what
1 them the introduction? Or did you speak only 1 occurred. I don't see them just not -- this incident
2 individually to them? 2 occurring and everyone just kind of ignoring it. I
3 A. No. I believe the three of them were together. 3 would think there is probably some conversation about
4 Q. And what kind of introduction was given? 4 what had happened.
5 A. Well, we explained why we were there. 5 Q. After you had interviewed each one of them, did
6 Q. And what did you say? 6 you find their statements to be identical?
7 A. That there was, we became aware of an incident 7 A. No.
8 that had happened, I believe it had been two days prior 8 Q. Is there any significance to the fact that their
9 at this point, or three days prior, I don't remember the 9 statements weren't identical?
10 exact time frame. I believe all three of them gave 10 A. That's one thing that my partner and I talked
11 indication that they knew at some point we would be 11 about is if we go talk to them and their statements are
12 there. In fact, Al even indicated that MCSO deputies 12 identical, there's going to be -- we would have an issue
13 had been to his house to ask about the criminal -- 13 with that, as an investigator. Each person is going to
14 Did you want me to tell you what my partner 14 have their own perception and view. And with this
15 said, or does he need to say that? 15 incident occurring in a vehicle and people sitting in
16 Q. No. I want you to tell me what was said. 16 different areas within a vehicle, they're all going to
17 A. Okay. So my partner explained that we were, we 17 see and hear different things.
18 were not there to conduct a criminal investigation; we 18 And that's what we learned in our investigation
19 were there to conduct the internal investigation for 19 is that things that Wayne saw, Keila may not have seen.
20 policy violations. And my partner made it very clear 20 Things that Keila saw or heard, Wayne did not see;
21 that the information that we gathered during our 21 things that Al said, Keila may not have seen but heard.
22 investigation would not be shared with a criminal 22 So there was nothing that alarmed us that there was some
23 investigator. 23 type of conspiracy where they came together and said oh,
24 All three of them indicated that they didn't 24 this is, here's our script, this is what we're going to
25 wanted to get, be responsible for Lieutenant Celaya, so 25 say. There was enough to where they saw -- they were
1 telling us what they individually saw and heard. I 1 a distinct difference in what the witnesses and what Al
2 don't believe that there was any type of conspiracy. 2 told us occurred.
3 Q. In any general way, did their statements 3 The slamming the glass in the bar was another
4 corroborate each other? 4 incident where it was apparent to my partner and I that
5 A. Yes. 5 that did not occur. Yet she was adamant that she not
6 Q. In what way? 6 only heard it but watched that happen.
7 A. Specifically, Lieutenant Celaya's disruptive 7 The events that occurred after Lieutenant Celaya
8 behavior, the striking, not referring to the kicks but 8 had walked home and said that she had left on her own in
9 Al being hit by Lieutenant Celaya on the arm, Al telling 9 her daughter's vehicle driving to West Valley Hospital;
10 Lieutenant Celaya to stop hitting him, and then the 10 when, in fact, the witnesses tell us that, no, it was
11 incident that that occurred at the Roman's Oasis with 11 Keila and Lieutenant Celaya that actually drove to
12 the discrepancy between Lieutenant Celaya saying the 12 Lieutenant Celaya's residence and actually -- I believe
13 drink was slammed and Al stormed out, to the other two 13 it was Lieutenant Celaya's. I'm trying figure out where
14 witnesses saying that didn't occur, to ultimately the, 14 they were. I'm sorry. Drove to Wayne and Keila's
15 the kicking in the vehicle where Al, Wayne, and Keila 15 residence, and there was another confrontation with Al,
16 were very clear and direct that, that Lieutenant Celaya 16 which Lieutenant Celaya denied.
17 had kicked Al in the head at least once. 17 Q. Anything else you can recall?
18 And, again, each person in the vehicle saw and 18 A. Not that I can think of. Those are the ones
19 heard something different, but all were consistent in 19 that stand out.
20 that Lieutenant Celaya had kicked Al in the head at 20 Q. POST also alleges that Lieutenant Celaya
21 least one time prior to him turning and striking her. 21 committed assault. I'm going to read you from the
22 Q. POST has alleged that on November 23rd and 24, 22 assault statute and then ask a question.
23 2013, Lieutenant Celaya hit her boyfriend and kicked him 23 A person commits assault by intentionally,
24 in the head. Did Lieutenant Celaya admit that to you? 24 knowingly, or recklessly causing any physical injury to
25 A. Yes. 25 another person.
1 Q. And did the testimony of the other witness 1 Do you believe Lieutenant Celaya committed
2 corroborate that? 2 assault?
3 A. Yes. 3 A. Yes.
4 Q. POST also alleges that on, in your two 4 Q. Explain.
5 interviews, December 26th and -- or excuse me -- 5 A. Is that the 1203(A)(1) that you read?
6 November 26th and December 2nd that she was dishonest to 6 Q. Yes.
7 IA investigators about the events that happened that 7 A. Because I believe there was a couple -- there
8 night. 8 may have been a 1203(A)(1) and (A)(2) --
9 Did you find evidence to indicate she was 9 Q. Right. But I'm going with (A)(1).
10 dishonest? 10 A. Okay. For the causing physical injury, Al --
11 A. Yes. 11 actually, I believe Lieutenant Celaya even admitted that
12 Q. Can you summarize the dishonesty? 12 she saw Al go to the hospital the same morning. Al
13 A. Each aspect, or are we just talking about the 13 indicated to my partner and I that, because of the
14 vehicle, or which -- 14 kick -- he had had two neck surgeries within, I believe,
15 Q. Each aspect, if you can recall. Or we can look 15 the past year -- and because of that kick, he had to
16 at documents if you need to. 16 have his daughter take him to the hospital. He was
17 A. Going back to the initial, where the evening 17 having pain. He had to have a CAT scan or CT scan, and
18 started to the -- I'm trying to play this, the timeline 18 was also given medication, pain medication. And was
19 in my head right now. 19 advised to follow up with his neck doctor, neck
20 In the vehicle, that the kicking Al, Lieutenant 20 specialist, for further evaluation later.
21 Celaya's stance is that she did not kick Al, she did 21 Q. POST also alleges Lieutenant Celaya committed
22 that as a result of being punched, and then she kicked 22 disorderly conduct, A.R.S. 13-2904(A)(1). I'll read it
23 him as self-defense or retaliation. I don't recall 23 to you and then ask you a question.
24 exactly. But she was adamant that her kicking him in 24 A person commits disorderly conduct if with
25 the head was after he struck her in the face. There was 25 intent to disturb the peace or quiet of a neighborhood,
1 To continue with that, you also have the 1 A. What I have testified to today?
2 fighting. I believe it was mentioned that she had 2 Q. Yeah. Have you talked to her prior to your
3 struck Al at least two times on the arm, once after 3 testimony?
4 being, he told her don't hit me again, and then that 4 A. I talked to her several times over the last
5 culminated to the kicking in the head. Which there was 5 several months in preparation for this.
6 a fight that ensued, because Al did turn and strike her 6 Q. Okay. And when's the last time you spoke to her
7 after being kicked. 7 about this case?
8 Q. Does the number of drinks that Lieutenant Celaya 8 A. Yesterday.
9 had that evening excuse assault or disorderly conduct? 9 Q. All right.
10 A. No. 10 A. And this morning.
11 Q. POST also charges that she committed false 11 Q. Okay. And did she tell you anything about the
12 reporting, that is during her interviews. I think you 12 testimony of the witnesses from yesterday, what they
13 sort of already summarized the dishonesty, but I want to 13 had --
14 ask you if she violated the false reporting statute, 14 A. No.
15 which is: It's unlawful for a person to knowingly make 15 Q. -- what they had testified to?
16 to a law enforcement agency of either this or a 16 A. She did not.
17 political subdivision, false, fraudulent or unfounded 17 Q. Okay. How long have you been with Goodyear?
18 report or statement or to knowingly misrepresent a fact 18 A. A little over eight years.
19 for the purpose of interfering with the orderly 19 Q. All right. And you stated that you and Sergeant
20 operation of a law enforcement agency or misleading a 20 Pacello drafted the internal affairs report, correct?
21 police officer. 21 A. Yes, ma'am.
22 In your opinion, did she commit false reporting 22 Q. You also talked about -- actually, Ms. Beck had
23 in her interviews? 23 asked you who drafted the notice of termination letter
24 A. Yes. 24 that was dated for January 17th, 2014.
25 Q. And have you already summarized the reasons? 25 Do you know who drafted that? She asked you if
1 IA had drafted it, and you said IA did not draft it. 1 investigation is it common for Goodyear to contact the
2 A. IA -- correct. IA does not. I believe that 2 principal first, instead of the witnesses, in an
3 comes from the City Attorney. 3 investigation?
4 Q. Okay. You actually drafted aggravating and 4 Kim is the principal in this case, right?
5 mitigating, correct? 5 A. The subject.
6 A. I don't recall if we did. I would have to look 6 Q. Oh, so Goodyear calls them the subject?
7 at the actual report if I can. I don't remember, 7 A. I was confused because Keila works at a school.
8 because we have not done that on every case, aggravating 8 So when you said principal, I wasn't sure what you were
9 and mitigating factors. 9 referring to.
10 Q. Okay. All right. For this particular, 10 But for our investigation, yes, we have either
11 January 17, 2014 notice of termination, do you believe 11 subject or witness.
12 that this was drafted by Human Resources personnel? 12 Q. Okay. So using the term subject of the
13 A. The notice of termination? 13 investigation, was -- Kim was the subject of the
14 Q. Yes. 14 investigation.
15 A. No. I believe that the notice of termination, I 15 Is it common practice for Goodyear IA to
16 believe comes from our city legal department. 16 investigate, or to interview, the subject prior to
17 Q. For the chief's signature? 17 talking to the witnesses?
18 A. I believe so. 18 A. I don't know that we have a consistent -- it's
19 Q. Okay. And -- okay. But you don't know, you're 19 case by case. There are going to be times where we have
20 assuming that they summarize what your report has 20 an allegation on an officer where they're interviewed
21 already stated, right? 21 first, or we may have a complainant that comes in, and
22 A. No. 22 so because we have the complainant in front of us, we
23 Q. Okay. 23 would conduct the interview with the complainant first.
24 A. What happens is we will submit our findings, our 24 So I don't know that there is a specific way; that we
25 final report, to the chief. 25 always do the subject first or we always do a witness
1 Q. Okay. And so Chief Geier, that's the Chief of 1 Pacello -- but you were in the room, correct, when
2 Goodyear? 2 Singleton was being interviewed?
3 A. Yes, ma'am. 3 A. Yes, I was.
4 Q. He advised you or asked you to do an 4 Q. And the interview would have been November 25th.
5 investigation, correct? 5 And you can look at Singleton's investigation in POST
6 A. Correct. 6 13, which I believe is going to be in the green book.
7 Q. Did Jeff Rogers say anything in that meeting in 7 A. I have it here.
8 regard to this investigation? 8 Q. Oh, you do? Okay.
9 A. Yes. 9 A. The 4th tab, interview with Lieutenant
10 Q. Okay. What did he say in that meeting? 10 Singleton, yes. November 25th at 6:25 in the evening.
11 A. He gave us a summary of his conversation with 11 Q. Okay. And when you start off speaking with
12 Lieutenant Celaya that had happened, I believe, the day 12 Lieutenant Singleton, you indicate that, that you've
13 before at the Starbucks and, ultimately, whatever 13 been aware, or IA has been made aware, of an incident
14 conversation they had at the police department. 14 involving Lieutenant Kim Celaya concerning an off-duty
15 Q. When did you have this meeting with Chief Geier 15 incident involving domestic violence. And you're asking
16 and with Jeff Rogers being present? When was that? 16 Lieutenant Singleton if he's aware of that, and he says
17 A. Can I refer to -- 17 he is. Do you remember that?
18 Q. Absolutely. 18 A. Yes.
19 A. I'm not sure which one. 19 Q. Okay. And then at that point you ask, or excuse
20 Q. Do you want to look at your internal affairs 20 me, Sergeant Pacello asks Lieutenant Singleton: How
21 report? 21 were you made aware of this incident? Which is the
22 A. I believe it's actually mentioned in there. 22 domestic violence incident, correct?
23 Q. Okay. So you're going to go to Tab 4. And it 23 A. Correct.
24 says the morning of November 25th. That would be page 24 Q. And then at that point, that's when Lieutenant
25 three? 25 Singleton begins talking about, he just gets off work
1 also, it's you and Sergeant Pacello are asking questions 1 this information, so I don't remember who I actually
2 of Keila? 2 gathered that from.
3 A. Correct. 3 Q. Okay. Then we have on page four, line 161, you
4 Q. Okay. On page two, line 62, you say that you're 4 say: Okay let's fast forward, go to the past Saturday.
5 going to ask some questions about an incident that 5 And then you say at line 161: And let's talk
6 obviously we became aware of that occurred this Saturday 6 about from when you initially...
7 and, Saturday night, early Sunday morning. 7 Met?
8 Do you see that? 8 And then line 165: Met up with...
9 A. Yes. 9 Line 169: Al and Kim.
10 Q. And of course you're saying you're only 10 Correct?
11 gathering the facts. 11 A. Correct.
12 On page three, line 20 -- line 95, Keila 12 Q. Okay. And when you're doing that, you're giving
13 indicates to you that she's only known Kim for roughly 13 them a point of reference, correct? This far, you've
14 about maybe six to nine months, right? 14 given Al, you've given Keila a point of reference when
15 A. I'm sorry. What line was that? 15 you're interviewing, correct?
16 Q. That's 95. 16 A. Point of the reference being when they met up
17 A. Yes. 17 together?
18 Q. Okay. So she hadn't known Kim for very long, 18 Q. Yes.
19 right? 19 A. Yes.
20 A. Correct. 20 Q. Okay. Now, I'd like you to turn to POST
21 Q. All right. You didn't ask Keila at that time 21 Exhibit 10, page three, line 96.
22 how long she had known Al, did you? 22 Now, this is an interview with Wayne Bearden,
23 A. At that time, no, I did not. 23 correct?
24 Q. Okay. Did you ever find out that Keila actually 24 A. Yes.
25 had known Al since she was 13 years old? 25 Q. And, again, it is Sergeant Joe Pacello and
1 Q. Sure. And I understand that. But when the 1 already showed, you're talking about how did Saturday
2 employee is served this, they are being told that they 2 start, how did the day start. Do you see that?
3 are to respond to a question, right? 3 A. Yes.
4 A. They're compelled, they're compelled to answer. 4 Q. And in that you're being very narrow and you're
5 Q. Okay. So the person who is sitting in front of 5 being very specific in your questioning, correct?
6 the questionnaire is being told that they are being 6 A. It's a specific question.
7 compelled to answer the question. 7 Q. Yeah.
8 A. Correct. 8 A. Yeah.
9 Q. Okay. All right inferring that there's going to 9 Q. It sure is. It's a good job. You did a good
10 be a question, right? 10 job. That was a good question, wasn't it?
11 A. If there's a question, yes, they are compelled 11 MS. BECK: Your Honor.
12 to answer. 12 MS. BAILLIE: I'm just --
13 Q. Wonderful. And that question, or questions, 13 ALJ EIGENHEER: Proceed.
14 shall be direct, correct? 14 BY MS. BAILLIE:
15 A. Correct. 15 Q. That's a good question, correct?
16 Q. They shall be narrow, correct? 16 A. Sure.
17 A. Correct. 17 Q. Okay.
18 Q. And the narrowly related to performance of an 18 A. I don't know how to answer that.
19 official duty, correct? 19 Q. All right. So and when you talk to Wayne, the
20 A. Correct. 20 same thing. You asked a specific question.
21 Q. Uh-huh. And shall be related to fitness for 21 But when you spoke with Kim, you just said, tell
22 duty, correct? 22 us how it happened, right?
23 A. Correct. 23 A. Correct.
24 Q. Okay. So on November 26, 2013, -- well, 24 Q. Okay. That's not specific or direct is it?
25 actually, when you talked to Al, and you asked Al 25 A. I don't know how specific or direct we could
1 questions, and I went over that with you, that question 1 have been based on the information we had.
2 was direct and narrow, wasn't it? 2 Lieutenant Celaya was the subject of the
3 A. Which question? 3 investigation, so we were reliant upon her to, to fill
4 Q. That would have been the question formulated on 4 in information where our questions could be more
5 page two when you said, we're going to ask you some 5 specific. It's going to start out broad because we
6 questions about an incident we became aware of that 6 really didn't have a lot of information of what
7 occurred on Saturday and Sunday night, early Sunday 7 occurred. So once we're able to conduct an interview
8 morning. 8 with her and other people, and now we can narrow down
9 Do you see that? 9 the specifics, I would imagine that our questions would
10 Oh, I'm sorry. That is going to be Tab 9. 10 be more direct and specific.
11 A. In blue? 11 Q. Okay. Jeff Rogers provided you with a memo.
12 Q. That would be in the green book actually. 12 A. Correct.
13 ALJ EIGENHEER: No, it's blue. 13 Q. And his memo is November 25th.
14 BY MS. BAILLIE: 14 Did you have that memo? You had access to that
15 Q. Oh, it is blue. I'm sorry. 15 memo, obviously, prior to speaking with Kim.
16 A. Okay. Tab 9, I have is Keila Mincey. 16 A. Correct.
17 Q. Oh, excuse me. It is Tab 8. I apologize. 17 Q. Did you not?
18 A. Tab 8. Okay. Yes, this is the transcript of 18 A. Yes.
19 our interview with Alvin Beard. 19 Q. Okay. And in that memo, you had specific
20 Q. Right. And on page two, you are telling Al that 20 information, correct?
21 you're going to talk about an incident which occurred 21 A. Correct.
22 this past Saturday, and then Joe Pacello said Sunday 22 Q. Okay. And you actually used Jeff Rogers' memo
23 morning. Do you see that? 23 with the specific information to formulate the notice of
24 A. Yes. 24 investigation where it says, the allegations are
25 Q. Okay. And then on page 5, 188, just as we 25 described as follows, correct?
1 A. Can you tell me where his memo is tabbed at so I 1 A. I don't recall if she did or not, if we did or
2 can look at it? 2 not. I believe we did, because I think Lieutenant
3 Q. You bet. It is tabbed at POST 16, Volume 2. 3 Celaya actually had some questions about the memo, from
4 A. And your question was we used information from 4 what I recall.
5 his memorandum to formulate -- 5 Q. Okay. So you believe that you provided Kim with
6 Q. To draft or formulate -- 6 Jeff Rogers' memo on November 26, 2013?
7 A. Correct. 7 A. I don't remember the exact date, but I do
8 Q. -- the notice of investigation, where it says 8 remember Lieutenant Celaya -- I don't remember if it was
9 the allegations are described as follows. 9 in the second interview where she had brought the memo
10 A. Correct. 10 in and had some, was questioning some things that were
11 Q. Okay. And you use that memo based on what Jeff 11 written in the memo. I do -- I don't remember the time
12 Rogers that -- well, strike that. Asked and answered. 12 frame of when she was given the memo.
13 So why did you not just go off of this memo and 13 Q. Okay. But it could have been in the December
14 start asking questions from his memo, from Jeff Rogers' 14 interview?
15 memo? 15 A. Correct.
16 A. This -- we were asking questions as a follow-up 16 Q. Prior to December, not prior to November 26th?
17 to his memo, on the information that she had given to 17 A. Correct.
18 Deputy Chief Rogers. 18 Q. That you provided it to Kim, for the record?
19 Q. Okay. When she spoke, when Kim spoke with 19 A. Yes.
20 Rogers, did, was she being investigated? 20 Q. Okay. You stated that there were, you used the
21 A. No. She was the one that brought the 21 term today under direct, that there were vast
22 information forward. 22 differences in between the three witnesses and Kim's
23 Q. Okay. And she's the one, by duty, she has a 23 recollection.
24 duty to report to her agency, correct? 24 Do you remember making that statement today?
25 A. Correct. 25 A. Not between the three witnesses. Between
1 Q. Okay. Now, does that -- well, does that duty 1 lumping the three witnesses, or four witnesses, together
2 apply to domestic violence victims? 2 and her statement.
3 A. That duty applies to police department 3 Q. Okay. And you said they were vast in the
4 employees. 4 discrepancies, right?
5 Q. Okay. But if a police department employee is a 5 A. It was the adjective I used.
6 victim, doesn't Arizona Constitution Article 2, victims' 6 Q. Well, vast means numerous.
7 rights, say that a victim doesn't have to report or 7 A. There were numerous.
8 participate? 8 Q. Okay. And you said that the differences, you
9 A. I don't know what the statute is but if that's 9 were trying to articulate on direct examination, the
10 what it says for a victim, then, then yes. 10 differences were in regard to who kicked, who hit who
11 Q. So a victim in domestic violence does not 11 first. Okay? Right? And when I say hit, I mean -- let
12 necessarily have to report to her agency? 12 me rephrase this. Who --
13 A. I believe it's the expectation of our department 13 Did Kim kick Al prior to being punched, Al
14 that if the employee is involved in an off-duty 14 punching Kim in the face, correct? That's the
15 incident, regardless of whether they are a victim, 15 discrepancy.
16 witness, subject, that, yes, they do have to report the 16 A. Between Lieutenant Celaya's statement and those
17 incident. 17 of the witnesses? Specific to who -- did Lieutenant
18 Q. Okay. Which Kim did report, did she not? 18 Celaya kick Al in the head prior to Al punching her in
19 A. Yes, she did. 19 the face?
20 Q. Okay. And when she spoke with Jeff Rogers, Jeff 20 Q. Yes. That's what I just said, yes.
21 Rogers drafted you, you and Sergeant Pacello, a memo, 21 A. Yes. That is correct.
22 which you had prior to speaking with Kim, correct? 22 Q. That is one discrepancy right there, correct?
23 A. Correct. 23 A. Correct.
24 Q. Did you provide Kim with a copy of this memo 24 Q. Now, you also said that slamming the glass down
25 prior to speaking with her? 25 on the bar was another discrepancy?
1 A. Correct. Correct. 1 Q. Okay. So Keila -- did you ever ask Alliyah when
2 Q. Okay. And then Keila also stated that Al was 2 Keila was talking to her when, when you spoke with
3 upset and then was laughing about it. Do you remember 3 Alliyah on Monday, December 9th?
4 Keila saying that? 4 A. I'm just reviewing my report.
5 A. Correct. 5 Q. You bet.
6 Q. All right. But Al said, nope, I was not upset, 6 A. So, and I'm looking at the bottom of the first
7 didn't even bother me. Isn't that what he said? Isn't 7 page of the interview with Alliyah. It says Keila was
8 that what Al said? 8 talking to Alliyah and telling her what occurred earlier
9 A. I don't recall. If you -- could you -- do you 9 in the evening.
10 know the page number -- 10 So that would have been on --
11 Q. Oh, absolutely. 11 Q. November 24th?
12 A. -- of the transcript? 12 A. Yes. The early morning, yes.
13 Q. Uh-huh. It's going to be POST 8. Just turning 13 Q. The early morning, Sunday morning?
14 to it. On page 11, you're going to go to line 470. 14 A. Correct.
15 Your question to Al is: 15 Q. Pretty much after the inci -- after Al had
16 Okay, so you walk out and get in the car. Were 16 punched Kim in the face, right?
17 you upset before you walked out of Roman's? 17 A. After the entire incident, yes.
18 A: Nope, and even... 18 Q. Okay. All right. That substantiates what Kim
19 475, your question is: Did you... 19 told you, that Al was upset, doesn't it?
20 477: I even told her that I ain't, that dude 20 A. Well, she says jealous. So I don't know if
21 didn't bother me. 21 being jealous and being upset are the same emotion.
22 Do you see that? 22 Q. Okay. But Wayne, Wayne says that Al was, and he
23 A. Yes. 23 uses the word, pissed, right? Not upset, pissed. He
24 Q. And then up on line 458, 459, it says: 24 uses that word. Do you remember that?
25 And it wasn't - I don't know, I mean, I wasn't, 25 A. Pissed, and then laughed about it.
1 Q. But pissed. 1 Q. All right. And do you see anybody else at the
2 A. Correct. 2 bar?
3 Q. Right? And in fact, pissed at both of them. 3 A. No.
4 So Wayne corroborated what Kim told you, that Al 4 Q. Okay. Now, is it possible that Wayne is waiting
5 was angry, Al was upset. Didn't he? 5 for Keila and Kim because they're in the restroom?
6 A. Correct. 6 A. I believe that is the reason.
7 Q. Okay. And Keila also substantiated the same, or 7 Q. Okay. And that's because Kim told you that her
8 corroborated the same when she said, yeah, Al was upset, 8 and Keila went to the bathroom, right?
9 right? And then laughed about it? 9 A. Correct.
10 A. Correct. 10 Q. Okay. There's no sound with this video is
11 Q. Okay. Now, you also made a comment that you 11 there?
12 viewed the video of Roman's, and you clearly -- let's 12 A. No.
13 get the right term, make sure I get the right term. On, 13 Q. Who's that that just walked into the frame in
14 in your investigation, which is going to be POST No. 4. 14 the lower right-hand corner?
15 A. Okay. 15 A. It's been a while. I think that's Al's head.
16 Q. Page 44. 16 Q. All right.
17 A. Okay. 17 A. I don't remember what he's wearing, but I
18 Q. No. 7. You say that you viewed the surveillance 18 believe that's him.
19 video -- it's going to start on line 4 of paragraph No. 19 Q. All right. I'll fast forward it here. Too
20 7 -- and that you obtained from PSU, obtained by PSU, 20 fast. All right.
21 excuse me, clearly shows that Alvin Beard did not slam 21 That, again, is Wayne sitting down, right?
22 his drink on the bar. Do you see that? 22 A. Correct.
23 A. Correct. 23 Q. We don't know who he's talking to at this point
24 Q. Okay. So, I want to go to this video for a 24 right?
25 minute, if you would indulge me. 25 A. Correct.
1 MS. BECK: Do we have an exhibit number on the 1 Q. Okay. So in the right-hand, bottom right-hand
2 video? 2 corner, who's that who is reaching for a drink?
3 MS. BAILLIE: It's your video, isn't it? It 3 A. That's Al.
4 would be the, 24 of POST. 4 Q. Okay. And do you know who this is, the back of
5 BY MS. BAILLIE: 5 the head of this one, this female in front of Wayne?
6 Q. And that video has several different camera 6 A. I believe that's Keila.
7 views. So we're going to go to camera No. 4, which is 7 Q. Okay. And in the lower right-hand corner, we
8 going to be the appropriate view. Okay. 8 see Al. And at the, the top head of -- is that Kim?
9 So do you remember -- do you get to see it 9 A. Yes, it is.
10 there? 10 Q. Okay. Now, do you believe Keila was intoxicated
11 A. I do. 11 at this bar? Did she appear to be intoxicated to you?
12 Q. Okay. So in, under camera No. 4, do you 12 A. Did she appear to be?
13 remember viewing or seeing this video right here? 13 Q. Uh-huh. As her movements -- did you look at
14 A. Yes, I do. 14 that? Do you remember looking at her movements?
15 Q. Okay. And it shows that on November 24, 2013, 15 A. I don't remember doing that.
16 about 1:45 in the morning, right? 16 Q. Okay. There doesn't appear to be anything in
17 A. Correct. 17 Kim's hand, does there, at this point?
18 Q. And in fact, all four, Al, Wayne, Keila, and 18 A. No. I'm sorry. I was not focused on her hands.
19 Kim, all stated that they were at Roman's about 1:30, 19 I'm just watching around the bar area.
20 1:45, right? 20 Q. Sure. Okay. So we know that Keila has already
21 A. Correct. 21 started drinking, and we know that Al has a drink on the
22 Q. So they were all in the ballpark? 22 bar. Do you see that?
23 A. Correct. 23 A. Yes.
24 Q. And as we go through -- all right, who is that? 24 Q. Okay. And this is probably the gentleman who
25 A. That is Wayne. 25 was drunk?
1 A. That's the gentleman that approached Lieutenant 1 Q. And he's trying to make amends for him, correct?
2 Celaya and -- 2 A. That's what it appears.
3 Q. Grabbed her hand and would not let it go? 3 Q. Shaking hands.
4 A. Correct. 4 A. Yeah.
5 Q. Okay. All right. And there's Al, and now he 5 Q. Okay. And it looks like, during that verbal
6 has a drink, right? In his hand right there. Did you 6 confrontation that was happening right there, that Wayne
7 see him pick it up? 7 was in between Al who was behind Wayne, correct?
8 A. I did not. 8 A. Correct.
9 Q. Okay. See that? 9 Q. And Al was rocking back and forth. Did you see
10 A. Yes. 10 that?
11 Q. Okay. And that looks like the vodka cranberry 11 A. I did not notice.
12 that he's going to hand to Kim. And this gentleman who 12 Q. Okay. And I want to show you Keila here as
13 is not letting go of Kim's hand is talking to Kim. You 13 she's talking to the other two females, and it looks
14 see Kim's face and then you see this guy's head. Do you 14 like she's trying to explain. Okay.
15 see that? 15 Do you see her finger trying to explain who Kim
16 A. Yes. 16 is in conjunction with Al? Do you see that?
17 Q. Okay. Okay. And remember Keila said that she 17 A. I see her pointing, but I don't know what
18 went to go get a bouncer, right? 18 she's --
19 A. Yes. 19 Q. Okay. All right. Now, looking at her movement
20 Q. Okay. So at that point we can assume that she 20 with her hands, would that indicate to you maybe a
21 went to go get a bouncer, right? 21 little bit of intoxication?
22 A. I believe that's what she was doing at that 22 A. I don't -- that would not be enough for me to
23 point. 23 draw that conclusion, just based on that one second of
24 Q. Okay. There was a comment about the 24 her moving her hands.
25 individual's friends coming over. Do you remember that? 25 Q. Looking at this video and looking at how many
1 So Al is not there in the photo is he, in the 1 movement, I want you to observe Kim's, where Kim's focus
2 video at this point? 2 is. Okay?
3 A. I think he may be. It's weird. If you do 3 A. Okay.
4 the -- because you have it expanded. 4 Q. Did you see that?
5 Q. I do. 5 A. His hand?
6 A. When you shorten it -- I know there's sometimes 6 Q. Yes.
7 where you, if you do the small version, you can kind of 7 A. Yes.
8 see almost, which is weird, because sometimes you can 8 Q. Did you see he has a glass in his hand, correct?
9 see more in just the smaller frame than the large frame. 9 A. Correct.
10 I do think there was a couple of times where he 10 Q. And, essentially, in his right hand with the
11 may have been off. 11 glass, he is hitting the bar two times. Do you see
12 Q. You're saying right down here? That's Al now 12 that?
13 again? 13 A. With the glass?
14 A. Correct. 14 Q. Yes.
15 Q. In the photo? Okay. In the video? 15 A. No. He is not.
16 So at this point, Wayne is laughing, but we 16 Q. Okay. Could it be his hand?
17 don't know what Al is doing, right? Except for 17 A. It appears that he pushes the glass, slides
18 drinking, correct? 18 it --
19 A. Correct. 19 Q. Okay.
20 Q. And he's standing behind Kim, right? Al is 20 A. -- and then with his hand it looks like he taps
21 standing behind Kim, correct? 21 the bar.
22 A. Correct. 22 Q. He hits the bar twice?
23 Q. And Kim and Keila are talking to one another, 23 A. Well, can you play it one more time?
24 right? 24 Q. Sure. So there his gin and tonic is -- he's
25 A. I can't tell. 25 drinking his gin and tonic. There's the glass, boom
1 Q. Okay. And we can let the Judge make her own 1 Al's hand as he's placing the glass on the bar.
2 perception of that. 2 A. I'm watching his arm movement.
3 Now, what I want to do is show you -- boy, it's 3 Q. Okay. All right. But here we get to see the
4 really hard to get this frame. 4 glass. We get to see him put it down and move it
5 Now, Kim, where is Kim facing? 5 forward, correct?
6 A. Her back is to him and her head is turned. 6 A. Correct.
7 Q. Okay. And what is she looking at? 7 Q. Okay. And, again, you don't know what that
8 A. She's looking down. What she's actually looking 8 sounded like?
9 at, I don't know, but her head is looking down. 9 A. Correct.
10 Q. Okay. Now, you do know because of what she told 10 Q. Okay. Now, you're saying -- you're minimizing
11 you. In her interview, she told you, in November of 11 the, if it's a -- you believe that it is two fingers or
12 2005 and again in December 2nd, that she looked because 12 three fingers on the bar, correct?
13 Al had hit the table, slammed the table. 13 A. I not minimizing. I'm telling you what, by
14 A. Slammed the glass on the table. 14 watching this video several times, I'm telling you my
15 Q. Okay. 15 perception. It appears that that is not a fist going
16 A. Which is what she told us. 16 like this, it appears like it's two fingers.
17 Q. All right. Now, as Al is placing, or throwing, 17 Q. Okay. And, like I said, I would trust that the
18 or slamming that glass down, you can't hear, can you, 18 Judge would be able to look at this itself.
19 what's happening in this? 19 MS. BECK: Your Honor, could we stop the
20 A. Correct. 20 commentary?
21 Q. You have no audio with this video? 21 MS. BAILLIE: Well, I was just --
22 A. Correct. 22 ALJ EIGENHEER: Proceed.
23 Q. All right. So you don't know what that sounded 23 BY MS. BAILLIE:
24 like when Al put that glass on the bar, do you. 24 Q. Kim is looking in the direction of Al's hand; is
25 A. I do not. 25 she not?
1 Q. Okay. You don't know if it sounded and appeared 1 A. She is looking down. I can't --
2 like a slamming of a glass hitting the bar, do you? You 2 Q. Okay.
3 don't know? 3 A. -- tell which way her head is canted, but she is
4 A. I don't know. I can just give you -- 4 looking down.
5 Q. No. So -- 5 Q. All right. And you, as an investigator, when
6 MS. BECK: Your Honor, she's interrupting the 6 you're looking at that, you don't know what she's
7 witness. Could you please let him finish. 7 looking at, but she told you, did she not, in the
8 MS. BAILLIE: Well, I thought he said he didn't 8 November 25th interview? She told you that she looked
9 know. 9 down, did she not? And looked at the glass?
10 MS. BECK: Well, he wasn't finished. 10 A. She told us that she watched him slam the glass
11 ALJ EIGENHEER: He said he didn't know, and he 11 is what she told us.
12 started to add to that when you started the next 12 Q. Okay. So in Kim's -- and Kim is there at the
13 question. 13 bar, right?
14 You can answer the question. 14 A. Correct.
15 THE WITNESS: I don't know what that sound made 15 Q. So at the time that Al is doing this motion,
16 like, but that movement was consistent with every other 16 whatever that motion is and Kim is looking down at
17 time he put the glass down on the table, other than him 17 whatever she's looking at, where is Keila and Wayne's
18 sliding it forward a little bit. 18 attention?
19 BY MS. BAILLIE: 19 A. It appears they're looking in the opposite
20 Q. Okay. But every other time that he's putting 20 direction of both --
21 the cup down, or the glass down, on the bar, Kim isn't 21 Q. Right.
22 looking in that direction is she? 22 A. -- Lieutenant Celaya and Al.
23 A. Correct. And that's my concern. 23 Q. So when they tell you, oh, they didn't see Al,
24 Q. Okay. So that -- and you can't see how he's 24 they didn't see Al slam down a glass or hit the table --
25 putting that glass on the bar because Kim is in front of 25 remember they told you that, right?
1 A. Or hear it, correct. 1 on her own to West Valley ER, didn't she?
2 Q. Okay. So that makes sense, doesn't it? Because 2 A. That was not the question that we asked.
3 they're the only two looking away while Kim is looking 3 Q. Okay.
4 down, correct? 4 ALJ EIGENHEER: Is this a good place to --
5 A. They are looking away, correct. 5 MS. BAILLIE: Yes.
6 Q. Okay. All right. Did you include that in your 6 ALJ EIGENHEER: Then we will break for lunch and
7 investigation, that Keila and Wayne were actually 7 go off the record at this time.
8 looking away at the time that Al placed his glass on the 8 (Recess taken from 12:04 p.m. to 1:40 p.m.)
9 bar? 9 ALJ EIGENHEER: And we are back on the record,
10 A. No. 10 and we were still in cross.
11 Q. Okay. Wouldn't that be considered a mitigator 11 MS. BAILLIE: Yes, Your Honor. Excuse me. I
12 in this case? 12 apologize.
13 A. No. Because when they were asked if they saw 13 BY MS. BAILLIE:
14 it, they said no. 14 Q. Before we went for a lunch break, Sergeant
15 Q. Well, that's correct. But when you asked them, 15 Hughes, I had asked you about, you were shown a video
16 and there's a crafty way, there's always a way to draft 16 and very quickly you indicated that Kim had indicated to
17 an investigation, correct? There's ways that you can 17 you that Al had slammed the glass on the bar. Do you
18 skew words, correct? 18 remember stating that?
19 A. I'm not sure what you're implying when you say 19 A. Yes.
20 that. 20 Q. Okay. Do you remember her saying either slammed
21 Q. There's ways that you can skew words, correct? 21 his fist or a drink on the bar? I can refresh your
22 A. No. I disagree with that. 22 recollection, if you go to your internal affairs
23 Q. Okay. When you put in your report that Keila 23 investigation. And that will be POST No. 4. It will be
24 and Wayne did not see Al placing the glass or slamming 24 page four.
25 the glass down, when you put that in your report that 25 A. I believe that was in the second interview with
1 Wayne and Keila did not see it, and you know that other 1 Ms. Celaya, if I'm not mistaken.
2 people are going to be reading your report, did you 2 You said page four?
3 think to advise the chief, or to advise HR that they 3 Q. Page four, paragraph one, the very first line:
4 were looking away and that's why they possibly didn't 4 Al became upset and either slammed his fist or
5 see or hear the glass coming down on the bar? 5 drink on the bar and walked out of the bar leaving
6 A. I believe the chief has actually seen this 6 Lieutenant Celaya and their friends inside.
7 video. 7 Do you see that?
8 Q. Okay. That's wonderful. I'm asking you, did 8 A. Correct.
9 you think about putting that into -- I don't know why 9 Q. Okay. All right. So that refreshes your
10 this just came up, sorry -- did you think about putting 10 recollection that she had told you?
11 that statement in your report? 11 A. Yes, it does.
12 A. No. 12 Q. Okay. Perfect. This internal affairs
13 Q. Okay. You just stated that you also considered 13 investigation report that you drafted, do you refer to
14 that Kim was dishonest because she had stated that she 14 the, the audio of the, of the interviews, or do you
15 left on her own to West Valley. Remember making that 15 already have a transcript of the interviews prior to
16 comment, that statement this morning at 10:18, right? 16 drafting your report?
17 A. Correct. 17 A. It, it -- from what I recall, it takes a couple
18 Q. Okay. Who went with Keila to West Valley ER? 18 weeks, I think, for the transcripts to come back in. So
19 A. Who went with Keila? 19 I think the summarized interviews are off of listening
20 Q. I'm sorry. I apologize. 20 to the audio recording of the actual interview.
21 Who went with Kim to West Valley ER? 21 Q. Okay. And so you listened to the recording and
22 A. She went by herself. 22 then you draft your report?
23 Q. Okay. So when Kim told you that she went on her 23 A. Correct.
24 own to West Valley, and that's what you said she told 24 Q. Okay. If you turn to the, your internal affairs
25 you, that Kim left on her own to West Valley, she did go 25 report, No. 7 -- page seven. Excuse me.
1 Q. Okay. Do you remember Lieutenant Singleton 1 paragraph, which is paragraph number eight, it says:
2 telling you that he felt like he was just a peer and 2 During the drive, Lieutenant Celaya and Kim
3 somebody to lean on? 3 began to become disruptive in the backseat of the
4 A. Yes. He did state that. 4 vehicle by exhibiting loud behavior, rolling the windows
5 Q. A friend and a coworker. He also used those 5 down, and yelling at drivers of other vehicles?
6 terms, right? 6 Do you see that?
7 A. Yes. 7 A. Yes.
8 Q. Okay. Why didn't you add that descriptive that 8 Q. Do you believe that Lieutenant Celaya was
9 Lieutenant Singleton felt like he was just a peer and a 9 yelling at drivers of other vehicles?
10 friend and a coworker? Why didn't you add that to your 10 A. Do I believe that?
11 report? 11 Q. Excuse me. When you wrote this, did you, was
12 A. I'm not sure what the relevance of that 12 that a fact that you believed was actually a fact that
13 statement is. 13 Lieutenant Celaya actually was yelling at drivers of
14 Q. It's a question. I'm asking you why. 14 another vehicle?
15 A. That's my answer. I don't see the relevance to 15 A. Yes.
16 adding that in. 16 Q. Okay. Where did you get that from?
17 Q. Okay. All right. Don't you believe that it 17 A. I believe that information came from Keila.
18 would have helped the reader to understand that 18 Q. Keila never said they were yelling out of the
19 Lieutenant Singleton was not acting as a supervisor or a 19 window.
20 person that she was reporting to? Would it not have 20 Do you think you might have mistaken it by what
21 given that picture to the reader? 21 Wayne had told you? And we can go to POST 10. And I
22 A. That's perception. And Lieutenant Singleton was 22 will quickly -- and that is going to be page seven.
23 not her supervisor at the time, so I'm not -- how 23 A. Okay.
24 someone reads this, that's strictly based on perception 24 Q. And it would be 290 and 291. This is Wayne
25 on what they think that statement would mean. 25 saying:
1 They wanted to roll down the window. Well, my 1 head/face by Lieutenant Celaya prior to him striking her
2 girl wanted to roll down the window so she could talk to 2 in the face.
3 drivers and all that stuff. 3 Q. Okay. So we now, we know that Al said three
4 Do you see that? 4 times. Then if we go to Keila.
5 A. Yes. 5 A. Well, if I can continue. He also said, I
6 Q. Okay. So here Wayne specified who was the one 6 believe, he was kicked after she, after he hit her in
7 who wanted to roll down the window and talk to drivers, 7 the face. If I recall.
8 did he not? 8 Q. Al said that?
9 A. Correct. 9 A. I'm going to look before I answer that, because
10 Q. Okay. So based on Wayne's statement, this would 10 I don't want to --
11 be inaccurate, this statement that you wrote on page 37. 11 What am I looking for now?
12 A. I don't know that that's inaccurate. Because I 12 Q. You're looking for Keila, excuse me, Kim -- Al
13 recall there being, whether it was Keila or Lieutenant 13 saying that Kim kicked him after he punched her.
14 Celaya stated that they were either talking to drivers 14 A. Al may not have said that. But I believe
15 of other vehicles or making some reference to that. And 15 Lieutenant Celaya said that.
16 I mean, we can obviously go through the transcript to 16 Q. Okay. So Al, and we're talking about Al Beard
17 try and find that. I'm not going to just make something 17 right now, he told you he got kicked three times?
18 up, so... 18 A. Before he punched Lieutenant Celaya.
19 Q. Well, let's see. We talk about not making 19 Q. That's what he said, right?
20 anything up. Let's go to page 44. 20 A. Correct.
21 A. Okay. 21 Q. Okay. So when we look at Keila, Keila never
22 Q. Let's go to No. 8. And if you go down to line 22 tells you that Al was kicked four times, does she?
23 eight, which starts with the road, and just before that, 23 A. I believe she felt what she believed to be one
24 the vehicle in the middle of the road and struck her 24 kick, she didn't see it, and then physically saw,
25 once in the face. In response, Lieutenant Celaya kicked 25 observed at least one kick.
1 Alvin Beard in the neck/head a fourth time. 1 Q. Okay. In fact, she tells you that, and you
2 Do you see that? 2 confirm, on page, this is going to be under POST 9, Tab
3 A. Correct. 3 9, page 27.
4 Q. Okay. When you wrote this, did you actually 4 A. Okay.
5 believe that the facts were that Kim had kicked Alvin in 5 Q. And you're going to look at line 1199, and
6 the head and neck a fourth time? 6 you're asking the question of Keila, saying:
7 A. Yes. 7 Okay, so she kicks him twice. He punches her.
8 Q. So he got kicked four times in the back of the 8 She kicks him again.
9 head? 9 And Keila says: Yes.
10 A. Well, in the head. I don't know about the back 10 And then you say: Okay, is there any other
11 of the head. I think -- 11 hitting or smacking?
12 Q. Okay. Head and neck. 12 She says: No.
13 A. -- the fourth one, I believe, was his face. 13 Do you see that?
14 Q. Okay. Now, Al says he got kicked three times, 14 A. Yes.
15 does he not? 15 Q. Okay. So again, where are you getting the four,
16 A. I don't remember exactly -- 16 being kicked four times?
17 Q. Well, then let's go to Al. Al is in POST 6. 17 A. Because --
18 Excuse me. POST 8. And it's going to be on page 33 and 18 Q. For the fourth time?
19 1447 is the line. Oh, excuse me. It's 14. I 19 A. Because Al said he was kicked three times before
20 apologize. 20 he turned and punched Lieutenant Celaya in the face.
21 It is -- go back to your internal affairs. I 21 Lieutenant Celaya told us that she kicked him after he
22 apologize. Your internal affairs, page 14. 22 punched her in the face.
23 A. Okay. 23 Q. But Al says that he was not kicked after she
24 Q. The very top, first line. What does it say? 24 punched him.
25 A. Al stated he was kicked three times in the 25 MS. BECK: Objection. Misstates the transcript.
1 time? 1 A. Yes.
2 A. I answered that. The fourth kick was from 2 Q. So in your report, the statements of Keila don't
3 Lieutenant Celaya. If he's saying he got kicked three 3 even make it in your report, do they? In regard to the
4 times, Lieutenant Celaya has been adamant that she only 4 fact that there was no arguing going on.
5 kicked him after he punched her, then that would be a 5 A. No, they do not.
6 fourth kick. 6 Q. They did not, did they?
7 Q. But everybody is saying there were three kicks. 7 A. Correct.
8 MS. BECK: Your Honor, she's just arguing with 8 Q. Now, you said that Al said that there was
9 him. He's answered the question three times. 9 arguing.
10 MS. BAILLIE: I will move on. 10 A. No. Alliyah and Wayne stated there was. In
11 BY MS. BAILLIE: 11 fact, I believe Wayne even said that Lieutenant Celaya
12 Q. Now, if we go to page 45. 12 had tossed, from memory, a phone charger or keys or some
13 A. Of the same -- which -- 13 other item at Al.
14 Q. Of the internal affairs investigation. 14 Q. Okay. Now, did you ask Wayne? Because you had
15 A. Okay. 15 just talked to Keila to, you just finished the interview
16 Q. At the very top it says -- I believe it's a 16 with Keila at 5:23, and then -- or at 6:20. Let's get
17 carry over -- Lieutenant Celaya then drove Keila Mincey 17 this right. At, yeah, at 6:20. And then you're
18 back to Alvin Beard's residence where Lieutenant Celaya 18 speaking with Wayne at 6:22.
19 engaged in a verbal argument with Alvin Beard before 19 Did you ask Wayne, when did Kim throw the
20 driving herself to West Valley Hospital. 20 charger -- or actually he says the keys -- when did Kim
21 Correct? 21 throw the keys at Al?
22 A. Correct. 22 A. I don't recall.
23 Q. That's what you wrote? 23 Q. You didn't ask him that, did you?
24 A. Correct. 24 A. I don't know. I don't recall.
25 Q. Who told you that there was a verbal argument? 25 Q. And, in fact, Keila told you that Kim was across
1 details that we didn't cover that Keila shared with us 1 into her.
2 as far as when Kim had arrived to the house. Keila had 2 Q. Okay. If you look at page 24 of POST No. 9,
3 wanted to talk to Al and Lieutenant Celaya to, I guess, 3 POST Tab 9 --
4 calm things down and work things out. That's when 4 A. Okay.
5 Lieutenant Celaya left. I don't know what the distance 5 Q. -- page 24.
6 was in between them when this toss of an item was. 6 A. Okay.
7 Q. All right. 7 Q. 1036. You say:
8 A. As far as the time you had asked before, this 8 Okay. You're trying to bear hug her...
9 would have been prior to Lieutenant Celaya going to the 9 To stop it.
10 emergency room. Because at that point, she tossed the 10 And 1040: And her body, upper body, is facing
11 item and then drove away to go to the emergency room. 11 up.
12 Q. And she drove away by herself? 12 Yes.
13 A. Correct. 13 And then she's kicking. If you look at page 23,
14 Q. Okay. Now, in your internal affairs 14 1027. Well, let's go to 1022:
15 investigation, page 38, paragraph six -- 15 Yes, because at that time I'm trying to bear hug
16 A. Okay. 16 her, I guess. You know, just grab her whole body and
17 Q. -- line three through five. You put in here: 17 try and stop it.
18 Lieutenant Celaya was struggling with Keila to 18 Do you see that?
19 break her grip and was gradually sliding low in the seat 19 A. Correct.
20 and had also slid over toward the middle of the 20 Q. Okay. Where does it say anywhere about sliding
21 backseat. 21 toward the middle of the backseat?
22 Do you see that? 22 A. You would probably have to go back a page or
23 A. I'm sorry. You said the -- are you talking 23 two. Because initially Keila demonstrated that she saw
24 about the very last paragraph or the -- 24 Lieutenant Celaya hit Al on the arm with her hand, which
25 Q. Yes. 25 prompted her to slide towards Lieutenant Celaya and grab
1 her hands. They started to slide over towards the, I 1 ask that question.
2 think she even said the words, middle console, so 2 Q. All right. Did you and Joe try to figure out
3 towards the middle, and continued to progress, where 3 what was happening in the back of the seat? Did you try
4 initially Keila was facing Lieutenant Celaya, holding 4 to role play, and try to figure out how do two people
5 her hand, and ultimately, as they are being pulled 5 get in that position? How could Kim actually kick? Did
6 towards Keila's seat, which is the rear driver, or 6 you ever try to figure that out?
7 passenger side seat, she has since turned Lieutenant 7 A. We actually did, yes.
8 Celaya to where Lieutenant Celaya's back is into Keila's 8 Q. Okay. And when you say you actually did, is
9 chest facing up, meaning that, referring that Lieutenant 9 that role playing?
10 Celaya is now at an angle to where the only way to do 10 A. Not in a vehicle, but the two of us
11 that is to slide down so she is facing up, almost 11 conversing -- because our first thought was how can you,
12 towards the roof of the vehicle. And Keila is now 12 since I have been in an Armada before, my first thought
13 trying to restrain her in a bear hug while she is 13 is how can you kick someone in the front seat when
14 feeling, and seeing, Lieutenant Celaya kick Al. 14 you're sitting in the back. And then, so we did, we
15 Q. Okay. So what you're referring to, and let me 15 brainstormed, like how could this actually occur.
16 just ask you, if you turn to page 20. 16 Once we were able to interview, not only
17 A. 20 in the -- 17 Lieutenant Celaya, but the other witnesses, and based on
18 Q. In the same section of 9. 18 the positioning and how things progressed when she was
19 A. Okay. 19 pulled over and her positioning, it made sense. Because
20 Q. Is what you are explaining here, what she was 20 from that position, sitting on the passenger side rear
21 attempting to explain to you, Keila was attempting to 21 seat at an angle, where your legs are up, which was
22 explain to you on 890 to 898? If you want to just read 22 demonstrated that Lieutenant Celaya's were, it would be
23 that to yourself. 23 very feasible to think that, yes, someone could kick the
24 A. Yes. 24 driver. Just as much as sitting in the, in the rear
25 Q. Okay. All right. So, and Keila at the time 25 driver's side passenger seat, that person would be able
1 actually demonstrated to you and Sergeant Pacello the 1 to kick a person sitting in the front passenger seat,
2 position with, in regard to the bear hug; is that 2 opposite. If that makes sense.
3 correct? 3 Q. It does make sense. Okay. So did you also try
4 A. Correct. 4 to figure out if, based on what Keila was showing you,
5 Q. All right. Did you ever look at Kim's vehicle, 5 if she's bear hugging Kim, and Kim is, her facing up,
6 the 2011 Armada? 6 and her feet are facing towards the passenger driver's
7 A. No, I did not. 7 side backseat, how would she get a laceration to the
8 Q. Why didn't you look at the vehicle? 8 left side of her eye?
9 A. Because I have been in Armadas before. I didn't 9 A. From being punched.
10 know that her vehicle would be anything special as 10 Q. Okay. In that position, Al was able to punch
11 opposed to another Armada. 11 her in the left side of the eye?
12 Q. Did you know if you had ever been into a 2011 12 A. Well, all witnesses stated that he actually put
13 Armada? 13 the vehicle in park in the roadway and physically turned
14 A. The one I have been in several times is a newer 14 his body and struck her in the face.
15 model. I don't know what it is. It would be post 2010. 15 Q. Okay. In your report you say that Al's head and
16 So unless there was a change in body style -- I have 16 neck, that a CT scan was conducted on Al's head and
17 been in a newer Armada. 17 neck, and he was given a shot of Demerol for pain.
18 Q. Okay. Did you get the height, weight of the 18 A. Correct.
19 individuals in the backseat. Like Keila, did you get 19 Q. Do you remember that?
20 her height and weight? 20 A. Yes.
21 A. Visual appearances. I didn't ask her her height 21 Q. Okay. In Al's investigation, or excuse me, in
22 and weight. 22 Al's interview, he never once tells you about Demerol.
23 Q. Okay. And Kim, did you ask Kim her height and 23 Where did you get Demerol?
24 weight? 24 A. Unless that was a, a side conversation he had
25 A. Again, it's visual appearance. No, I did not 25 with Sergeant Pacello, I don't know about the medication
1 that he had, he had received. 1 informal conversation from witnesses in your internal
2 Q. Okay. So you're saying you didn't write a shot 2 affairs investigation, right?
3 of Demerol? 3 A. Yes.
4 A. I don't know what medication he received. 4 Q. Okay. Now, in your internal affairs
5 Q. Okay. And then after that, Al was later told by 5 investigation on page 25, there is a thing called,
6 his doctor, during a follow-up appointment, that he 6 Follow-Up, there's a section called, Follow-up, isn't
7 suffered whiplash as a result of being kicked in the 7 there?
8 head and neck. Where did you get -- 8 A. Yes.
9 MS. BECK: What page are you on? 9 Q. Okay. And in fact on Wednesday, November 27th,
10 MS. BAILLIE: Yes. It's 41 of the internal 10 somebody, you, I guess, wrote that you followed up for a
11 affairs investigation. 11 video surveillance, we made contact with the store
12 BY MS. BAILLIE: 12 manager at Estrella Parkway.
13 Q. Where did you get the term whiplash? 13 Do you see that?
14 A. That was when we, my partner and I, Sergeant 14 A. Yes.
15 Pacello had gone to Wayne and Keila's residence a few 15 Q. Okay. And you also say you went to Safeway,
16 days, I believe, after our interview, for a follow up. 16 that you went to QT, that you talked to a desk clerk and
17 And the reason being is that Keila had mentioned that 17 at another -- for a video. But where in the follow-up,
18 she had received a text message from Lieutenant Celaya 18 where are you telling anybody that you went back over to
19 while Lieutenant Celaya was sitting in the parking lot 19 three witnesses and spoke with them and received further
20 of the West Valley Emergency Room. And it would have 20 information about this case?
21 been the morning, I believe, of the 24th, early morning 21 A. It's not in our report.
22 of the 24th. We had asked Keila if we could see that, 22 Q. Why isn't it in the report?
23 the text message. At the time of our interview, I 23 A. Again, our intention was to go over there and to
24 believe she had mentioned that she had switched phones, 24 seek text messages. The information we gathered was
25 but still had the other phone, and so we were to come 25 just in small talk. We weren't doing follow-up to do
1 back later to see that. And I believe it was a couple 1 follow-up on the -- I mean, doing a follow-up interview.
2 of days. 2 The follow-up we have listed here is, these were the
3 So when my partner and I went over there to try 3 tasks that we were actually doing follow-up on, getting
4 and view these text messages, Al was also outside, and 4 video surveillance. Our task was doing follow-up to
5 there was just some small talk of, hey, how are things 5 gain text messages that were gone, that didn't exist
6 going, did you go to the doctor. And that may be also 6 anymore.
7 the time where Al mentioned -- and I don't know this for 7 Q. All right. So you talk about video, going over
8 sure, this is something that you would obviously have to 8 the video on November 27, but you don't tell anybody
9 ask Sergeant Pacello, the Demerol -- but I believe that 9 that there were no text messages that you were able to
10 was a time when Al mentioned to us that he went to his 10 retrieve, even though you tried to retrieve them,
11 doctor and said that he had suffered whiplash. 11 correct?
12 Q. Okay. Did you take any notes when you went over 12 A. Correct.
13 to Keila and Wayne's house? 13 Q. Wouldn't that have been important in this case?
14 A. No. I mean, we're talking a very brief -- our 14 A. I don't know that it's important. It should
15 intention of going over there was to get, to view text 15 have been in this report, we should have included that,
16 messages. We were not going over there to do a 16 that we did go back as follow-up.
17 follow-up interview, and it was just by chance that all 17 Q. When did you go back? What was the date?
18 three of them were standing out front. So we weren't 18 A. I don't -- I can't tell you the exact date. I
19 going to be rude and not just have some brief 19 want to say it was within two days of our interview with
20 conversation of, hey, how are things going. So we 20 Keila and Wayne and Al. It was within a very short
21 didn't take notes, we didn't record it. This wasn't a 21 time. I don't remember the exact, the exact day.
22 formal interview. This was merely just saying hey, how 22 Q. Okay. In your report, you stated that -- let me
23 are things going, how's the neck. That was the 23 just find it -- on page 40.
24 specifics of it. 24 A. Okay.
25 Q. Okay. So you used information that was just an 25 Q. And this is going to be the full paragraph
1 number two, and it's line seven. So almost the last 1 A. Okay.
2 line. It says: 2 Q. And go to Tab 2. This is POST's Charge Board
3 Al was currently lying down on the bed, closed 3 documents. And in this, if you go to page two, these
4 the door behind her, and engaged in another verbal 4 are case notes. Page two?
5 argument with Al? 5 A. Yep.
6 And I'll read that appropriately. So starting 6 Q. Okay. And these are case notes. Now, AZ POST,
7 at line five: Lieutenant Celaya -- 7 it appears, used your internal affairs investigation and
8 A. Hold on. I'm sorry to cut you off. I don't 8 reiterated some of the facts in their case notes. For
9 have the numbers on mine, so I'm trying to -- 9 instance, if you look at No. 3, paragraph No. 3, line 3:
10 Q. Paragraph two. 10 During The Drive, Lieutenant Celaya became
11 A. Yeah, but you said number -- 11 disruptive and rolled down the windows yelling at
12 Q. And number five, line five. 12 passing motorists?
13 A. Okay. I'm sorry. 13 Do you see that?
14 Q. Lieutenant Celaya entered Keila and Wayne's 14 A. Yes.
15 residence, walked into the house, entered the bedroom 15 Q. And in fact, we already established that that
16 where Al was currently lying down on the bed, closed the 16 was Keila who was doing that, based on what Wayne had
17 door behind her and engaged in another verbal argument 17 stated. But, also, if you look at page three of AZ
18 with Al. 18 POST, if you go to number, paragraph No. 11 and lines
19 Right? 19 three and four again:
20 A. Correct. 20 Upon Lieutenant Celaya's arrival, she entered
21 Q. Where did you get that from? 21 the residence and a verbal argument ensued?
22 A. I don't know. I don't know. 22 Do you see that?
23 Q. Because in reality, Keila never says that. In 23 A. Yes.
24 fact, Keila is the one on, under Tab 9 of Keila's 24 Q. Okay. We also have, under No. 12, the very last
25 interview, if you go to page 32 and page 34. 32 is 1419 25 line, number four:
1 to 1421, this is where Keila is saying that Kim comes 1 He was -- meaning Al -- was later determined to
2 over, my husband, Wayne, is in our room, Kim comes in, 2 have sustained whiplash from the kicks.
3 she goes in the bedroom with Al and shuts the door and 3 Right?
4 I'm just kind of sitting there. 4 A. Correct.
5 Do you see that? 5 Q. Okay. And that came from your report. AZ POST
6 A. Yes. 6 has also included terms, if you look at No. 14,
7 Q. And she says, again, I didn't hear anything. 7 paragraph No. 14, line, one, two, three -- four:
8 And again, on page 34, she says there was, there was no 8 Lieutenant Celaya refused to provide any
9 argument. 9 information and asked him not to make any notifications
10 In other words, you ask was there arguing going 10 concerning her appearance and/or demeanor.
11 on, and she said no, right? 11 And that was Kim Celaya with Sergeant Pinuelas?
12 A. Correct. 12 Do you see that?
13 Q. However, you wrote in your investigation that 13 A. Yes.
14 the chief and everybody reads, including AZ POST, that 14 Q. And so AZ POST is using your report and your
15 Keila went in -- excuse me -- Kim went in, closed the 15 terms to draft their case notes. Do you see that?
16 door behind her, and engaged in another verbal argument 16 A. Yes.
17 with Al. You wrote that in there, correct? 17 Q. But your report has inaccuracies in them,
18 A. Correct. 18 because you -- isn't that correct, what we've just
19 Q. Okay. Did you realize that all of these 19 established?
20 statements that you were making would eventually go to 20 A. Specific to which one?
21 POST? 21 Q. We, we've just gone over them. The fact on page
22 A. It's based on the discipline. So if the 22 40, that there was no engagement of another verbal
23 employee is terminated or resigns in lieu of, then, yes, 23 argument with Al behind closed doors?
24 I know our investigations go to POST. 24 MS. BECK: Your Honor, that misstates the
25 Q. Okay. I want you to go to the white notebook. 25 testimony.
1 MS. BAILLIE: No. It does not. We just went 1 Kim refused to provide any information and asked
2 over this. 2 Sergeant Pinuelas not to make any notifications, Kim
3 MS. BECK: Okay. There is the other testimony 3 didn't have a requirement to, to provide any information
4 contrary that he's already testified about. 4 to Sergeant Pinuelas, did she?
5 ALJ EIGENHEER: So noted. 5 A. No.
6 BY MS. BAILLIE: 6 Q. Was that a no?
7 Q. On page 40, paragraph two, line six through 7 A. No, she did not.
8 eight, did anybody tell you anybody -- anybody not 8 Q. Sergeant Pinuelas is in fact, a subordinate,
9 including Keila because we know Keila did not tell you 9 right?
10 this -- did anybody tell you that there was, they 10 A. Correct.
11 engaged in another verbal argument, Kim and Al engaged 11 Q. Okay. So didn't Kim tell you that she told
12 in another verbal argument? 12 Sergeant Pinuelas that she was going to handle it?
13 A. Alliyah. 13 A. She told him not to say anything because she was
14 Q. Behind closed doors? 14 going to handle it.
15 A. I don't recall. I'd have to look exactly where 15 Q. Okay. And sergeant, lieutenant -- it was
16 she said the verbal argument occurred. 16 Lieutenant Singleton that told Sergeant Pinuelas not to
17 Q. We have Alliyah. So if you look at page two of 17 tell anybody, correct?
18 Alliyah's transcript, and you look -- and again, these 18 A. Oh, I don't recall that.
19 are not transcripts, so I apologize. This is a summary. 19 Q. Okay. If you go to Lieutenant Singleton's
20 The fourth paragraph: 20 interview, which is going to be POST 13, and it is going
21 Alliyah stated that after a while, Kim and Al 21 to be on page six.
22 exited the room and walked out front and both Keila and 22 A. Okay.
23 Wayne followed. Alliyah stated, while they were 23 Q. Oh, you know what. I'm sorry. It's not. It's
24 outside, she could tell that Al and Kim were arguing? 24 page four. I apologize. Page four.
25 Do you see? 25 A. Okay.
1 Had she not gone forward, he would have contacted Deputy 1 Q. What's the date of this memo?
2 Chief Rogers. 2 A. June 16, 2014.
3 Q. Okay. 3 Q. And who is it from?
4 A. That's absolutely proper for him to tell a 4 A. Lieutenant Scott Benson.
5 subordinate, do not tell because we don't, for lack of 5 Q. And who is it addressed to?
6 better, we would not want to bring embarrassment to 6 A. Chief Geier.
7 Lieutenant Celaya and have the department know that she 7 Q. Are you familiar with this memo?
8 was at the training building at 4 o'clock in the morning 8 A. Yes, I am.
9 with an injury to her eye. 9 Q. What's the incident portrayed here? If you need
10 Q. Okay. So if it's okay for Lieutenant Singleton 10 to refresh your memory, go ahead.
11 to tell Sergeant Pinuelas to keep it quiet, why isn't it 11 A. I do. Just give me one second, please.
12 okay for Sergeant, excuse me, Kim, Lieutenant Celaya, to 12 This is in reference to a, a civil standby that
13 tell the sergeant you don't need to notify? 13 was requested, I believe, Lieutenant Celaya -- and this
14 A. Because she is the subject. She is telling a 14 goes back to November of 2013 -- Lieutenant Celaya had
15 subordinate, telling the subordinate not to make 15 contacted Chief Geier, and the details of that
16 notification. You have a lieutenant, who now the 16 conversation I don't know, but I know it was requested
17 subordinate is now notifying his lieutenant, which is 17 that an officer stand by -- Al and Lieutenant Celaya,
18 the proper way of doing it. The report goes up the 18 who are living together at the time, I believe Al was
19 chain of command, not down. Meaning, Lieutenant Celaya, 19 leaving the residence and may have been taking -- there
20 as the subject of what occurred is telling the 20 was a question about the property that he was taking.
21 subordinate not to say anything, and now that 21 Lieutenant Celaya didn't want him taking some property.
22 subordinate is now making notification to his 22 So Lieutenant Scott Benson, who was the on-duty watch
23 lieutenant. So it's going, now, back up the chain of 23 commander, which is the highest ranking person on shift,
24 command like it's supposed to. There's a huge 24 responded and stood by while Al gathered whatever
25 difference between that. 25 belongings he was getting and put in his vehicle and
1 I asked where the television set was, and she told me it 1 going on and she stated no. The house appeared to be in
2 was in his car in the driveway. I spoke with Lieutenant 2 order and there were no visible signs of an altercation
3 Celaya about the property already being loaded in his 3 either in property damage or injury.
4 vehicle, that it was a civil issue, but if she could not 4 Q. Next paragraph.
5 prove ownership, a receipt or something, that I could 5 A. I immediately went outside and told the
6 talk to him about possibly leaving it. Lieutenant 6 gentleman in the vehicle that I was all set and didn't
7 Celaya then told me that he, referring to Al, had 7 need him to stay. He thanked me and then went on to say
8 bought, purchased the television and that it was 8 that he was tired of Kim being controlling and accusing
9 supposed to be a gift for the house. I then told her 9 him of infidelity. He became very upset and began to
10 that, with that information, that the television was 10 cry as we parted company.
11 actually his and that there was nothing I could do. 11 Q. Did, according to this memo, did Al do anything
12 Lieutenant Celaya stated she knew that but that she 12 wrong?
13 thought it wasn't right of him to do. 13 A. No.
14 MS. BAILLIE: Okay. And I'm actually going to 14 Q. You talked about going over to the residence and
15 object to this memo and to any further statements or 15 finding Al, Keila, and Wayne out in the front yard,
16 anything about this memo in regard to the fact that this 16 right?
17 memo was drafted June 16th of 2014. My client was 17 A. Correct.
18 terminated from Goodyear PD January 17th, 2014. This 18 Q. Did they provide you any information of
19 memo has come after termination. This memo from -- I 19 significant, that is important, that is not in your
20 guess a Lieutenant Benson wrote a memo. I don't know 20 report?
21 why he wrote this memo -- 21 A. Are you referring to the second time I contacted
22 MS. BECK: Your Honor, does she have a specific 22 them?
23 objection or is she just going to give a speaking 23 Q. Yes. When they were out in the yard and you
24 objection. 24 went over there to talk about the text.
25 MS. BAILLIE: Yes. I'm objecting to this memo, 25 A. No. There was nothing of significance in that
1 A. Yes. 1 A. Yes.
2 Q. On paragraph three, which we've gone over 2 Q. There was much conversation about whether Al was
3 several times, but I'd like to highlight it again, at 3 mad, pissed, whatever the case may be.
4 the top, on page, line 91, read what your question is. 4 Does it make any difference whether Al was mad
5 A. Okay. Why don't you go ahead and tell us 5 or not in terms of whether you can justify Lieutenant
6 exactly what, what happened and from the beginning to 6 Celaya's conduct?
7 the end. Be as descriptive as possible. Let us know 7 A. No.
8 how it started and progressed and how it ended. 8 Q. Okay. Please elaborate.
9 Q. When you say from the beginning to the end, 9 A. His -- all three witnesses, including Al, were
10 would you have expected her to disclose they had started 10 very clear that Lieutenant Celaya was the aggressor and,
11 out at Majerle's? 11 not only struck him on the arm with her hand several
12 A. Absolutely. 12 times, but also kicked him in the head/neck area several
13 Q. Do you remember who was the first witness who 13 times before he actually struck her with his fist. His
14 told you they were at Majerle's? 14 demeanor, whether he was angry, pissed, upset, was not
15 A. The first -- I believe Al was the first person 15 really relevant because he did not strike her before
16 we interviewed, the first witness. He told us that. 16 being hit several times.
17 Q. Do you believe that your question from beginning 17 Q. In terms of whether she committed assault, does
18 to end was specific enough to inform her what you were 18 it make any difference whether she hit or kicked him
19 talking about? 19 three times, four times?
20 A. Yes. 20 A. No. One time would be considered an assault.
21 Q. Exhibit 16. 21 Q. Okay. There's been much conversation about
22 A. Can I expand on that question -- 22 whether he slammed his drink down, pounded the table,
23 Q. I'm sorry. Go ahead. 23 tapped the table, or whatever the case.
24 A. Okay. And your question was, was it specific 24 Does it matter whether he slammed the drink down
25 enough. And the reason why I say yes, because her 25 or not?
1 Q. Would you turn to POST Exhibit 18 in the blue 1 Q. On page seven, line 289, what does Al tell you
2 book, please? 2 he had to drink?
3 A. Okay. 3 A. I had a gin and tonic over there, but there,
4 Q. This is a letter from -- or is it a memo -- a 4 over there, but we -- I'm sorry, I have to slow down.
5 letter from Deputy Chief Marzocca. 5 I had a gin and tonic over there, but we was
6 And, Your Honor, I may have misidentified this 6 there from, from 11:00 to close.
7 in my exhibits. I think I said it was from the chief. 7 Q. Did he disclose he had a Yukon?
8 It's from Deputy Chief Marzocca, in my witness list. 8 A. No.
9 ALJ EIGENHEER: Oh, I'm sorry. Exhibit 18? 9 Q. No. Does it matter whether he had a Yukon or
10 Okay. 10 not?
11 BY MS. BECK: 11 A. No.
12 Q. And it's address to Kim Celaya? 12 Q. In the big scheme of things?
13 A. Yes. 13 A. No, it does not.
14 Q. And this is the notice of recommendation for 14 Q. There was a bit of, a bit of conversation about
15 termination? 15 Wayne saying Lieutenant Celaya threw something, and you
16 A. Correct. 16 were asked did you measure the difference, the distance.
17 Q. On page five, does he list aggravating and 17 A. Correct.
18 mitigating factors? 18 Q. What difference does it make what distance it
19 A. Yes. 19 was?
20 Q. Would you read those factors, please? 20 MS. BAILLIE: Objection. Leading.
21 MS. BAILLIE: Actually, I'm going to object. 21 ALJ EIGENHEER: You can answer the question.
22 This is outside the scope of cross-examination. I never 22 THE WITNESS: I don't know what the relevance is
23 asked about this. I never talked about this particular 23 to the distance.
24 notice of recommendation of termination. My whole 24 BY MS. BECK:
25 questions on cross-examination was the notice of 25 Q. Just one second, please.
1 A. This is another internal form for the Arizona 1 well, this is why I drafted this, this is why I said,
2 Peace Officer Standards and Training Board. This is our 2 this is why I wrote this. I don't know that.
3 peace officer record of appointment, status and 3 And if -- and maybe if they want to do a voir
4 training. So every officer in the State of Arizona has 4 dire of this witness, I could do that and find out. Or
5 one of these records at Arizona POST. 5 if Nancy, if Ms. Beck would like to ask that question.
6 Q. When counsel was going over several points in 6 But otherwise, it is inappropriate for this witness to
7 the, in this case overview -- and by the way, I'm sorry, 7 be talking about the specifics of this document and how
8 I'm onto 3 already. I apologize. 8 certain words are being used and how it affects POST,
9 Was this case overview written by Jeff Kirkham? 9 because this is not the person who wrote this.
10 A. Yes. 10 MS. BECK: Your Honor, I'm not asking her how it
11 Q. Counsel went over several points. One was that 11 affects POST. Counsel went through a number of picayune
12 Sergeant Hughes and the IA people had provided POST 12 items. None of those items matter in terms of whether
13 certain information, and one of the pieces of 13 the alleged conduct is true and whether the violations
14 information was who rolled down the window and yelled. 14 of rules have occurred. She opened the door. This
15 POST has alleged two pieces of conduct here. The first 15 witness can testify about whether those issues matter or
16 is that Lieutenant Celaya hit her boyfriend and kicked 16 not.
17 him in the head. 17 MS. BAILLIE: I did not open the door to this
18 Does who rolled down the window and yelled 18 witness.
19 affect whether that conduct is true or not? 19 MS. BECK: She opened the door to the issue of
20 MS. BAILLIE: I going object to this witness 20 the case overview and the picayune little points.
21 talking about a document that was drafted -- it's 21 ALJ EIGENHEER: I'll allow the question.
22 already been established that Jeff Kirkham drafted this 22 BY MS. BECK:
23 document and is the author of this document. I don't 23 Q. My question, again, was, does who rolled down
24 know who Jeff Kirkham spoke with. I don't know what he 24 the window and yelled affect whether Lieutenant Celaya
25 read, or how he got to this, writing this document, but 25 hit her boyfriend and kicked him in the head?
Page 461
1 STATE OF ARIZONA )
COUNTY OF MARICOPA )
2
3 BE IT KNOWN that the foregoing proceedings were
taken before me; that the foregoing pages are a full,
4 true, and accurate record of the proceedings all done to
the best of my skill and ability; that the proceedings
5 were taken down by me in shorthand and thereafter
reduced to print under my direction.
6
I CERTIFY that I am in no way related to any of
7 the parties hereto nor am I in any way interested in the
outcome hereof.
8
I CERTIFY that I have complied with
9 the ethical obligations set forth in ACJA 7-206(F)(3)
and ACJA 7-206 J(1)(g)(1) and (2). Dated at Phoenix,
10 Arizona, this 8th day of December, 2014.
11
12
_______________________________________
13 KAREN L. KESSLER
Certified Reporter
14 Arizona CR No. 50821
15
I CERTIFY that Coash & Coash, Inc., has complied
16 with the ethical obligations set forth in ACJA 7-206
(J)(1)(g)(1) through (6).
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
_______________________________________
24 COASH & COASH, INC.
Registered Reporting Firm
25 Arizona RRF No. R1036
consider (1) 287:19 323:6,7 database (2) 334:13; 311:25;332:4;333:15; direction (4) 303:12;
considered (4) 396:11; corroboration (1) 323:6 335:3 334:11;348:16;352:14; 393:22;394:24;395:20
397:13;442:20;445:19 couch (1) 410:12 date (10) 314:10; 359:5;373:3,5,13; directly (7) 312:4;
consistent (4) 315:12; counsel (9) 433:12,18; 323:25;353:2,9;374:7; 432:7;433:20;441:23, 318:9,14,25;329:19;
340:19;350:18;393:16 439:2,6;441:9;452:6, 423:17,18;434:1; 25;445:5,8;450:22 367:11;435:4
console (2) 414:15; 11;454:11;458:18 451:22,23 departments (1) 334:21 disagree (1) 396:22
416:2 counter (3) 329:13; dated (4) 313:8;324:8, depends (1) 277:7 disciplinary (1) 445:17
conspiracy (2) 339:23; 330:2;389:7 10;347:24 Deputies (2) 314:17; discipline (5) 338:4,10;
340:2 County (7) 304:14; dates (1) 309:23 337:12 349:5;425:22;445:16
Constitution (1) 373:6 310:23;314:17;334:7, dating (1) 358:15 Deputy (39) 290:4; disclose (5) 439:11;
consumed (3) 327:16, 10,10;335:4 daughter (5) 318:2; 291:10,19,22;292:20; 440:10;441:20;445:10;
19;402:6 couple (12) 276:17; 343:16;378:9,11; 302:24;305:3,5,25; 446:7
consuming (2) 328:4,4 291:15;299:24;300:12; 410:12 306:5,8,9,22,25; disclosed (1) 335:2
contact (5) 314:23; 307:20;315:17;343:7; daughter's (2) 318:14; 307:15;308:1,12,15; disclosure (7) 459:8,9,
319:13;350:1;364:17; 344:8;361:5;388:10; 342:9 309:12;310:9,16; 10,11,12,16,24
422:11 399:17;421:1 dawned (1) 289:11 311:1,14,23;312:16,20; discovery (1) 459:25
contacted (10) 284:2,4, course (1) 360:10 day (12) 282:20; 313:10;315:5;317:9; discredit (1) 334:23
9;302:18;310:23; court (4) 291:9;295:21, 305:14;313:21;338:22; 323:22;333:21;351:4; discrepancies (2)
364:13;431:25;432:1; 22;334:20 352:12;359:19;363:6; 353:3;372:18;432:1; 318:5;375:4
434:15;438:21 cover (1) 413:1 367:24,25;370:2; 441:10,20;444:5,8 discrepancy (8) 327:20,
contacting (3) 285:20; coworker (3) 280:16; 423:21;449:9 describe (2) 391:15,17 22;331:20;340:12;
289:23;312:3 401:5,10 days (6) 337:8,9; described (4) 371:25; 375:15,22,25;376:4
continually (1) 297:2 crafty (1) 396:16 420:16;421:2;423:19; 372:9;414:9,10 discussed (1) 361:15
continuances (1) 460:4 cranberry (1) 384:11 460:12 describing (3) 408:9; discussion (4) 313:22,
continue (3) 314:13; create (1) 304:13 dayshift (2) 276:24; 414:23;431:2 25;314:2;443:12
345:1;406:5 credibility (1) 334:20 277:3 description (2) 315:13; dishonest (5) 331:12;
continued (1) 416:3 criminal (25) 295:13, Dead (1) 292:14 414:5 341:6,10;397:14;455:2
Continuing (3) 309:11, 23;310:19,21;317:19; deal (2) 431:12;460:7 descriptive (3) 364:24; dishonesty (3) 341:12;
12;310:8 320:20,20,22,23;332:3, dealing (1) 302:25 401:8;440:7 345:13;456:23
contrary (1) 428:4 4;333:11;334:17,22; December (14) 321:10; desk (1) 422:16 disorderly (13) 328:16,
contributed (1) 304:3 335:5;337:13,18,22; 324:8;330:21;331:9, detail (2) 289:10,11 23;333:4;343:22,24;
controlling (1) 438:8 338:6,7;355:23,24; 13;332:12;341:5,6; details (6) 311:5,6; 344:4,9,25;345:9;
convenience (1) 315:20 356:10,14;445:13 374:13,16;378:6,12; 349:18;413:1;434:15; 443:6,14;447:8;455:7
conversation (33) criminally (1) 356:11 379:3;392:12 456:16 dispatch (8) 269:15,20;
270:2;273:22;277:17; criteria (1) 334:18 decide (2) 292:23; detectives (3) 310:25; 274:19;275:2,4;
278:10,13;279:7; Cross (7) 273:17; 457:10 311:3;333:21 284:14;294:10;312:3
282:7;284:24;286:15; 274:8;294:3;346:19; decided (4) 277:23; determine (5) 315:10; disrupt (1) 346:7
287:10;289:7,20,22; 398:10;455:18,21 351:5,6;441:16 318:23;323:6;335:1; disruptive (11) 324:23;
293:16;305:6,17,19; CROSS-EXAMINATION (5) decision (5) 325:4; 338:4 328:16,23;333:7;
310:12;314:3;339:3; 274:11;294:6;346:22; 328:6;457:2,3,9 determined (2) 327:18; 340:7;344:3,9,13,14;
352:11,14;356:7,18; 444:22,25 declined (1) 314:18 427:1 403:3;426:11
419:24;421:20;422:1; cry (3) 296:21,21; deem (1) 437:17 determines (1) 338:9 distance (4) 413:5;
434:16;442:2,21; 438:10 defense (2) 335:2,6 difference (10) 304:8; 446:16,18,23
443:11;446:14;456:17 crying (5) 270:6; defining (1) 365:8 317:14;328:3;342:1; distant (1) 289:13
conversations (1) 284:18;285:3;288:3; definite (1) 327:20 432:25;442:4,18; distinct (1) 342:1
447:19 435:22 definitely (1) 280:17 443:13;446:16,18 distracted (1) 290:13
conversing (1) 418:11 CT (3) 332:17;343:17; delay (1) 306:2 differences (3) 374:22; distraction (1) 300:2
convince (1) 291:1 419:16 demeanor (2) 427:10; 375:8,10 distraught (3) 286:23;
cooperate (2) 311:8; culminated (2) 321:6; 442:14 different (7) 330:14; 287:12;297:6
459:25 345:5 Demerol (5) 419:17,22, 339:16,17;340:19; disturb (1) 343:25
cooperation (1) 356:12 culmination (1) 329:4 23;420:3;421:9 365:24;381:6;443:23 disturbing (1) 333:5
copy (4) 303:18;304:9; cup (2) 389:5;393:21 demonstrated (3) differently (3) 297:10, Docket (1) 268:2
349:7;373:24 currently (4) 424:3,16; 415:23;417:1;418:22 18;319:18 doctor (4) 343:19;
corner (6) 382:14; 429:10;441:15 demonstrating (2) difficult (2) 297:24; 420:6;421:6,11
383:2,7;385:8,12; cursing (2) 329:3; 414:17,19 298:3 document (26) 303:15;
389:23 344:22 demonstrative (2) difficulty (2) 299:17,21 365:7;366:9,16,23,24;
correlation (2) 443:8,10 cut (6) 271:7;272:11, 459:3,20 diminish (1) 346:8 367:4,17;452:21,23,23,
corroborate (2) 340:4; 16;278:19;285:4;424:8 demonstratively (1) dire (1) 454:4 25;453:1,5,10,14,16,
341:2 458:20 DIRECT (13) 269:6; 16,23;454:7;456:4,8,
corroborated (7) D denied (1) 342:16 280:23;283:11;301:19; 12,16,19;457:23
307:21,22;319:2; Department (26) 269:9, 340:16;368:14;369:2; documents (7) 341:16;
329:14;331:25;380:4,8 dad (1) 323:16 10;283:15,18;291:15; 370:24,25;371:10; 426:3;457:15;458:19;
corroborating (3) 309:2; damage (1) 438:3 301:22;302:4,6,9; 374:21;375:9;450:10 459:13,19;460:5
domestic (20) 289:14; drivers (6) 403:5,9,13; 455:18;457:7;458:1,3, 429:11 exact (7) 271:16;
291:3;298:14,16; 404:3,7,14 6,12,17;459:22;460:16 engagement (2) 287:7; 337:10;356:18;374:7;
310:20;313:18;322:9; driver's (2) 418:25; eight (5) 347:18;387:3; 427:22 423:18,21,21
324:22;332:8,10,21,23; 419:6 403:1;404:23;428:8 engages (1) 344:2 Exactly (7) 293:5;
333:4,25;354:15,22; driveway (2) 435:10; either (16) 290:18; engaging (1) 333:6 297:20;341:24;364:22;
365:4;373:2,11;441:24 436:2 312:3;316:12;323:6; enough (4) 339:25; 405:16;428:15;440:6
done (6) 299:20; driving (6) 308:7,8; 329:2;334:5;345:16; 386:22;440:18,25 EXAMINATION (7)
312:23;348:8;355:13; 309:4;327:2;342:9; 349:7;350:10;361:24; ensued (2) 345:6; 269:6;283:11;301:19;
356:13,13 409:20 389:2;398:20;399:4; 426:21 375:9;433:10;450:10;
door (17) 270:4; drove (13) 318:13,21; 404:14;438:3;458:19ensure (1) 460:2 455:21
275:17;336:4,9,18,19; 325:16;326:20,22,23; El (1) 302:5 entered (4) 424:14,15; examined (4) 269:4;
410:15;414:22;424:4, 327:1;331:22;342:11, elaborate (1) 442:8 426:20;429:9 283:9;301:17;450:8
17;425:3,16;429:11; 14;409:17;413:11,12 element (2) 443:3; entire (1) 379:17 ex-boyfriend (1) 288:21
435:21;454:14,17,19 drunk (1) 383:25 460:7 equal (1) 298:8 Except (1) 388:17
doors (3) 427:23; dude (1) 377:20 else (22) 272:5;273:25;
ER (3) 397:18,21;398:1 exceptionally (1) 299:5
428:14;429:5 due (2) 313:16;334:2 281:24;283:20;286:2;
escorted (1) 358:20 exculpatory (1) 335:7
dorm (2) 319:9,10 duly (4) 268:17;282:24; 289:23;290:7;299:18,
especially (2) 297:25; excuse (21) 274:23;
dove (1) 314:21 301:6;449:22 19;300:4;303:22; 458:9 281:9;313:4,9;341:5;
down (53) 286:7; duplicate (1) 304:13 308:5;314:20;317:8;essence (1) 334:14 345:9;353:20;354:19;
300:21;308:7,22; during (38) 270:2; essentially (1) 390:10
318:18;338:11;342:17; 369:17;376:16;380:21;
316:23;323:13;330:6; 274:6;306:4,20;308:3; 367:18;382:1;431:12;
established (4) 426:15; 398:11;399:25;403:11;
357:10;361:19;371:8; 309:1,3;321:23; 437:25;458:23 427:19;429:16;452:22 405:18,19;406:12;
375:24;382:21;388:12; 324:22;325:2,18; email (6) 312:15,19,25;
establishing (1) 357:11 419:21;425:15;432:12;
389:6,6,22;392:8,9,18; 326:17,20;327:6,14,16; 313:7,11;349:7 Estrella (4) 315:11,21; 456:10
393:17,21,21;394:4; 328:1,10,13;329:9; embarrassed (9) 321:8;422:12 exhausted (1) 285:16
395:1,4,9,16,24;396:4, 330:20;331:8;337:21; 272:22;274:14,17; E-T-R-O-N (1) 450:2 Exhibit (42) 303:15;
25;397:5;402:25; 344:21,24;345:12; 287:16,17;297:4,5,5; evaluation (1) 343:20 304:4,8,9,18,21;
403:5;404:1,2,7,22; 356:6;358:11;359:25; 298:24 even (24) 278:13; 309:11;313:3;314:7;
413:4;416:11;424:3, 361:24,24;385:11; embarrassing (1) 290:4;291:5,6;296:10; 319:23,25;320:1;
16;426:11;429:10; 386:5;403:2;420:6; 292:18 298:17;299:8;309:8; 321:10;322:23;323:21;
432:19;442:22,24; 426:10;445:9;456:13 embarrassment (3) 337:12;343:11;356:13; 324:2,6,9;325:8;
446:4;449:16;452:14, duties (1) 367:12 297:14;299:13;432:6 377:7,18,20;402:22; 330:17;333:19;334:6;
18;453:3;454:23; duty (18) 270:22; emergency (9) 278:22; 410:16;411:3,11; 362:21;381:1;408:6;
456:21 279:22;280:7;294:24; 280:3,8;295:2,8; 412:19;416:2;423:10; 433:23;437:21;439:2,
draft (10) 324:14; 324:20;332:7,20; 309:18;413:10,11; 437:4;449:3;456:3 3,4,17,18;440:21;
348:1;349:10;353:17; 333:3;367:12;368:19, 420:20 evening (24) 284:1; 441:9;444:1,9;445:20;
372:6;396:16;399:22; 22;372:23,24;373:1,3; emotion (1) 379:21 306:16;313:9;325:15, 447:10;451:5,24;
402:6;427:15;453:5 448:5,7;449:10 emotional (2) 296:11, 15,19,20;326:4,8; 459:15,17
drafted (17) 347:20,23, 18 327:16;328:2,25; exhibiting (1) 403:4
25;348:1,4,12;349:17; E emotionally (1) 296:12 329:5;341:17;345:9; exhibits (3) 444:7;
353:6,8;373:21; employed (4) 269:8; 354:10;363:10;365:5, 458:25;460:3
399:13;436:17;452:21, earlier (5) 305:12; 283:13;301:21;450:12 9;379:9;441:2,7,17; exist (1) 423:5
22;453:20;454:1;456:4 329:18;331:18;379:8; employee (9) 313:2; 449:7 exited (1) 428:22
drafting (1) 399:16 441:8 320:9,11,18;368:2; Event (5) 304:7;309:3; exonerate (2) 325:5;
draw (1) 386:23 early (6) 277:6;360:7; 373:5,14;425:23;445:7 311:12;330:9;338:15 349:2
drawn (3) 271:22; 369:7;379:12,13; employees (6) 366:17, events (8) 307:23; exonerated (3) 325:9;
295:22;344:19 420:21 25,25;367:4;373:4; 318:6;319:22;329:4; 326:5,13
drink (14) 316:22; effect (1) 271:14 445:7 338:19;341:7;342:7; exoneration (2) 325:23,
330:2,6;340:13; egregious (1) 334:19 encounter (2) 359:5; 351:4 25
380:22;383:2,21; EIGENHEER (61) 433:19 eventually (2) 304:15; expand (1) 440:22
384:6;398:21;399:5; 268:1,4,12,15,19,23; encourage (1) 459:25 425:20 expanded (1) 388:4
442:22,24;445:23; 272:20;273:17;274:8; end (6) 284:24;329:5; everybody (6) 299:18; expectation (1) 373:13
446:2 282:14,16,19,21,23; 364:23;440:7,9,18 402:15,16;409:7; expected (4) 431:20;
drinking (7) 383:21; 283:1,4;294:3;300:19, ended (3) 279:11; 425:14;431:11 440:10;445:6,13
385:10;388:18;389:19; 21;301:5,8,12;346:12, 364:25;440:8 everyone (6) 317:8; experience (3) 297:22,
390:25;402:15,16 15,18;365:20;369:13; enforcement (9) 318:11,17;331:21; 23;443:18
drinks (4) 316:20; 370:13;387:19;391:17; 297:22,23;298:1,9; 339:2;460:10 experienced (1) 291:17
345:8;402:12,19 393:11;394:22;398:4, 310:13;334:10;345:16, evidence (12) 303:15; explain (10) 303:16;
drive (5) 328:12; 6,9;408:4,6;428:5; 20;346:8 315:19;316:13;335:7; 327:24;328:21;343:4;
344:11;403:2;408:17; 429:22;433:2,5,7; engage (1) 445:13 341:9;437:17,21; 344:7;363:17;386:14,
426:10 437:2,16,19;444:9; engaged (8) 324:20; 439:15;451:7;453:17; 15;416:21,22
driver (4) 327:2; 445:2;446:21;449:16, 409:19;424:4,17; 458:20;459:24 explained (3) 337:5,17;
344:16;416:6;418:24 24;450:3;454:21; 425:16;428:11,11; evident (1) 330:15 338:4
half (1) 286:14 385:11 huge (2) 300:2;432:24 include (2) 396:6; 17;341:17;356:6
hand (22) 336:14; herself (9) 281:25; hugging (2) 414:25; 402:10 Initially (14) 270:2;
344:23;376:9;383:17; 288:4,4;318:11,13; 419:5 included (4) 320:14; 302:25;304:10;323:14;
384:3,6,12,13;385:21; 331:22;397:22;409:20; Hughes (15) 301:4,6, 334:13;423:15;427:6 326:18;329:14;336:5,
389:25,25;390:5,8,10, 413:12 10,11,14,21;346:24; including (8) 306:16; 19,20;362:6;376:18;
16,20;394:1,24; hesitant (2) 287:23; 355:10;398:15;429:24; 318:12;349:24;387:4; 414:10;415:23;416:4
408:14;415:24;416:5; 311:7 433:12,18;452:12; 425:14;428:9;439:24; initiate (1) 353:19
442:11 hey (6) 275:24;290:19; 456:11,15 442:9 injure (1) 332:24
handing (1) 367:20 303:2;421:5,20,22 H-U-G-H-E-S (1) independent (1) 319:1 injury (12) 271:10;
handle (4) 279:2; higher (1) 448:7 301:11 index (1) 391:20 273:24;298:15,16;
281:25;430:12,14 highest (4) 434:23; Human (1) 348:12 indicate (6) 306:1; 306:23;313:19;325:2;
hands (6) 383:18; 448:24;449:8,11 hurt (1) 408:15 341:9;353:13;354:12; 332:11;342:24;343:10;
386:3,20,24;414:12; highlight (1) 440:3 husband (4) 296:10,20; 367:13;386:20 432:9;438:3
416:1 himself (1) 311:2 410:13;425:2 indicated (21) 284:12; Inn (1) 315:25
hang (3) 277:11,13,23 hired (1) 302:5 hypothetical (1) 293:15 285:25;288:15;291:20, inside (8) 316:15;
happen (2) 292:14; history (5) 291:8; hypothetically (1) 21;293:13;294:9; 321:8;329:17;399:6;
342:6 293:10;358:14,15; 293:19 295:25;305:24;306:15; 429:8;435:20;447:3,4
happened (23) 271:5, 445:17 318:8,10;328:11; instance (1) 426:9
19;285:6,8,21;286:21; hit (24) 293:17;305:23; I 329:10;331:20;337:12, instead (2) 318:20;
287:13;288:6;289:14; 308:1,3,4,5,13;323:18; 24;343:13;398:16,16; 350:2
310:24;333:14;337:8; 331:1;340:9,23;345:4; IA (10) 324:14;341:7; 400:24 insult (1) 332:24
338:15;339:4;341:7; 375:10,11;392:13; 348:1,1,2,2;350:15; indicates (1) 360:13 integrity (1) 334:13
352:12;363:13;364:23; 395:24;406:6;408:21; 354:13;452:12;455:3 indicating (2) 306:22; intended (1) 313:13
370:22;408:16;440:6; 415:24;442:16,18; ice (1) 336:17 460:11 intends (1) 458:19
441:3;443:3 447:13;452:16;454:25 idea (2) 285:8;315:14 indication (2) 293:21; intent (2) 332:24;
happening (4) 364:3; hits (1) 390:22 identical (4) 339:6,9,12; 337:11 343:25
386:6;392:19;418:3 hitting (7) 340:10; 349:11 individual (7) 308:22; intention (3) 318:19;
happens (1) 348:24 344:24;390:11;393:2; identify (1) 320:4 376:9,24;378:14; 421:15;422:23
hard (3) 299:16; 407:11;408:13;456:23 ignoring (1) 339:2 385:16,23;437:3 intentionally (4) 332:9,
391:12;392:4 hold (5) 344:23; III (2) 451:15,17 individually (2) 337:2; 22;333:5;342:23
hat (1) 385:19 391:10;414:11,16; ill (1) 270:5 340:1 inter (1) 336:1
head (28) 309:7;325:1; 424:8 imagine (2) 338:21; individuals (3) 385:3; interfering (1) 345:19
330:23;331:10;340:17, holding (3) 270:4; 371:9 387:13;417:19 internal (23) 302:12;
20,24;341:19,25; 408:14;416:4 immediate (1) 333:10 individual's (2) 384:25; 303:9,20;320:19,23;
345:5;375:18;382:15; home (13) 279:5,8; immediately (3) 290:22; 451:11 321:2;337:19;338:5;
383:5,8;384:14;392:6, 285:7,9,11,12;318:8; 296:7;438:5 indulge (1) 380:25 347:20;352:20;398:22;
9;395:3;405:6,9,10,11, 331:21;342:8;363:4; impeachment (1) 335:7 infer (1) 297:9 399:12,24;405:21,22;
12;419:15,16;420:8; 431:7;448:20,23 implied (1) 367:16 inferring (1) 368:9 409:14;413:14;420:10;
452:17;454:25 Honor (13) 346:20; implying (1) 396:19 infidelity (1) 438:9 422:1,4;426:7;429:25;
head/face (1) 406:1 370:11;393:6;394:19; important (5) 286:11; info (1) 270:19 452:1
head/neck (5) 324:25; 398:11;409:8;427:24; 402:14;423:13,14; inform (1) 440:18 interpretation (3)
331:4,7;332:16;442:12 429:13;436:22;444:6; 438:19 informal (1) 422:1 325:25;326:1,6
hear (10) 329:24; 454:10;458:15;460:14 impression (1) 317:20 information (56) interrupting (1) 393:6
335:18,21,24;339:17; hoping (1) 315:18 improper (1) 437:5 289:18;302:21,22; intersection (1) 315:23
392:18;396:1;397:5; Hospital (10) 309:25; impropriety (1) 437:11 303:7;305:5,9;306:9; interview (104) 273:3,
410:18;425:7 310:4;318:14,20; inaccuracies (1) 427:17 307:14,17,21,22,25; 15;281:3;296:10;
heard (5) 339:20,21; 331:22;332:15;342:9; inaccurate (3) 327:8; 308:11,15,18,21; 307:8,10,12;312:13;
340:1,19;342:6 343:12,16;409:20 404:11,12 309:13;310:15;311:17; 314:7,10,14,25;315:2,
hearing (3) 295:22; hot (1) 338:22 inappropriate (1) 454:6 321:25;322:1;327:7; 4,7;316:25;317:2,3,5,6,
460:12,18 hotel (1) 315:24 inci (1) 379:15 328:22;335:6;337:21; 12,20;318:1,4;319:5,7,
Hearings (1) 459:23 hour (4) 286:13,14; incident (40) 303:1,5; 349:13,18,23;362:1; 15;320:5;321:11,15,17,
heart (2) 281:17; 328:14;448:9 306:6,20;310:19; 371:1,4,6,20,23;372:4, 23;322:25;323:4,8,9;
357:14 hours (6) 309:22;322:7, 312:21,24;313:2,18; 17,22;403:17;421:25; 325:12,13;327:6,14,17;
heated (4) 387:11,14, 17;327:1;441:7;448:13 315:23;318:7;323:5; 422:20,24;427:9; 328:10;329:9;330:20;
23;443:12 house (12) 326:23; 327:25;328:2;333:20; 429:7,9;430:1,3; 331:9,13,19;335:10,11,
height (4) 417:18,20, 337:13;338:16,21,24; 334:3;337:7;339:1,15; 436:10;437:7;438:18; 18,21,24;350:16,23;
21,23 359:3;402:6;413:2; 340:11;342:4;349:6; 439:12,14;445:11; 354:4,9;356:2,20;
help (2) 315:19;316:13 421:13;424:15;436:9; 354:13,15,21,22; 452:13,14;453:13; 359:23,25;361:24,25;
helped (1) 401:18 438:1 356:13;358:5,11; 457:22 362:22;363:25;364:3,
hereby (2) 367:7;439:8 how's (1) 421:23 360:5;369:6,21; informed (1) 330:24 9,12,19,19;366:11;
herein (4) 269:2;283:7; HR (2) 349:9;397:3 373:15,17;379:17; initial (11) 305:2;307:6; 367:17,25;369:19;
301:15;450:6 hug (6) 414:7,15;415:8, 434:9;437:8;448:16, 315:7;317:6,19; 371:7;374:9,14;
here's (2) 339:24; 15;416:13;417:2 19;457:21 323:23;325:13;327:7, 376:15;379:7;392:11;
Law (19) 268:5,18; 18,23,24;312:14,20; lines (3) 363:13;414:2; L-O-R-I (1) 450:1 442:24;446:9;453:15;
269:3;282:25;283:8; 313:7;314:9,18;315:8; 426:18 loss (3) 290:12;296:20, 454:12,15
297:22,23,25;298:9; 316:17;317:4,6,10,15, list (5) 334:13,15,16; 24 matters (3) 331:15;
301:7,16;310:13; 21,24;318:6,8,10,12, 444:8,17 lost (1) 296:10 439:13;445:11
334:10;345:16,20; 17,18,21;320:10; listed (3) 322:10;334:1; lot (19) 270:19;271:10, may (29) 270:3,5;
346:8;366:23;449:23; 321:16;323:7,23; 423:2 23;287:18;289:14; 272:20;282:20;300:21;
450:7 324:4,20,24;325:5,13, listened (1) 399:21 290:9,10,10;298:4; 306:13;316:4;317:21;
lead (1) 336:16 14;326:6,18,18,22,22; listening (1) 399:19 302:23;303:1;315:13, 327:8;334:20;339:19,
leading (4) 272:19; 327:2,15;328:10,15,22; lists (1) 324:18 16;344:21;371:6; 21;343:8;346:14;
307:23;330:12;446:20 329:2,9,12,20,24; little (11) 270:6;271:8; 400:15;408:18;420:19; 350:21;363:17;365:20;
lean (1) 401:3 330:20,24;331:1,2,7,8, 289:10;321:3;347:18; 443:11 388:3,11;406:14;
leaning (2) 414:19,25 12,20,25;332:7,20; 386:21;387:3,3; loud (3) 403:4;443:22, 410:3;421:6;434:19;
learn (1) 320:22 333:3,14;334:12; 393:18;402:19;454:20 25 439:15;442:3;444:6;
learned (7) 305:6; 335:4;337:25;340:7,9, live (1) 443:24 loved (1) 290:12 449:16;451:18;458:4
307:15;311:24;314:5; 10,12,16,20,23,24; lived (1) 311:10 low (1) 413:19 maybe (18) 271:19;
325:18;326:21;339:18 341:20;342:7,11,12,13, lives (2) 319:8;441:15 lower (2) 382:14;383:7 272:6;280:11;286:6,
learning (1) 299:20 16,20;343:1,11,21; living (4) 338:21,24; lumping (1) 375:1 13;299:7;323:9;326:1;
least (11) 274:1;288:8; 344:4,11,13,14,20,23; 358:18;434:18 lunch (2) 398:6,14 330:12;358:24;360:14;
309:8;311:10;325:1; 345:8;351:3,6;352:12; loaded (1) 436:3 lying (3) 424:3,16; 385:2;386:20;391:19;
338:22;340:17,21; 353:21,24;354:9,12,14, located (2) 315:20; 429:10 431:4,4;441:18;454:3
345:3;389:1;406:25 16,20,24;361:3; 316:7 MCSO (5) 310:25;
leave (6) 277:2;282:20; 363:25;364:20;371:2; location (3) 311:11; M 313:16,23;333:21;
316:20;324:3;449:19; 374:2,8;375:16,17; 315:21;329:11 337:12
451:3 384:1;395:22;399:6; locations (2) 307:19; ma'am (8) 283:16; mean (13) 273:13;
leaving (5) 330:1; 400:7,14,15,24;401:1, 315:17 284:7;297:1;298:4; 298:6;330:7;367:18;
399:5;434:19;435:25; 9,19,22;402:16;403:2, long (19) 269:10; 347:21;352:3;450:25; 375:11;377:25;391:5;
436:6 8,13;404:13,25;406:1, 276:6;283:17;286:12, 457:1 401:25;404:16;421:14;
left (24) 271:8;282:4; 15,18;407:20,21;409:3, 13;291:14;295:22; mad (8) 378:1,4,14; 423:1;433:14;448:15
285:2,14;313:20; 4,17,18;411:11;413:3, 301:23;314:4;347:17; 412:14,15,15;442:3,4 meaning (5) 410:13;
315:12;318:11,13,18, 5,9,18;414:11,16; 358:15;360:18,22; magnetic (1) 312:7 412:14;416:9;427:1;
19;319:3;328:12; 415:24,25;416:4,7,8,9, 361:1,4,16,22;455:23; maintain (1) 298:7 432:19
331:21,24;342:8; 14;418:17,22;420:18, 460:6 maintained (1) 335:3 means (2) 365:13;
376:2;378:13,21; 19;424:7,14;426:10, longer (1) 295:8 Majerle's (8) 325:20; 375:6
397:15,25;413:5; 20;427:8;430:15,16, look (36) 272:12; 326:12,24;363:16; meant (2) 326:2,3
419:8,11;435:1 19;431:1,6,8,15,23,23, 290:19;291:5;303:14; 440:11,14;441:8,21 measure (1) 446:16
left-hand (1) 273:4 25;432:7,10,12,16,17, 304:4;313:3;341:15; makes (2) 396:2;419:2 medical (4) 310:1,7;
legal (1) 348:16 19,23;433:12,14;434:4, 348:6;352:20;353:23; making (14) 312:21; 332:13,14
legs (1) 418:21 13,14,17,21,22;435:2, 354:5;357:4;372:2; 328:6;333:7;334:11; medication (4) 343:18,
length (1) 314:3 14,17,20,24;436:2,6, 383:13;389:23,25; 374:24;391:8,19; 18;419:25;420:4
lengthy (3) 313:22,25; 12,20;437:5,23,25; 394:18;406:9,21; 397:15;404:15,19; medications (1) 332:17
314:1 439:18;441:11,15; 407:5;408:8;410:8,9; 425:20;431:22;432:22; meet (9) 303:2;304:23;
letter (5) 334:6;347:23; 442:5,10;443:2,14; 412:10,11;415:2,13; 448:16 305:11,13;306:25;
444:4,5;459:11 445:5;446:15;447:2,5, 417:5,8;426:9,17; male (1) 378:20 307:3;311:4;441:1,18
letting (2) 376:10; 10,12,24;448:2,14,18, 427:6;428:15,17,18; males (1) 387:2 meeting (16) 304:24;
384:13 20,25,25;449:2,3,3,4,9; 451:5 malfeasance (1) 346:4 305:2,3;306:10;307:6;
level (1) 443:19 452:16;454:24 Looked (9) 270:5,20; man (2) 298:8;435:9 311:3;323:23;336:14;
Liaison (1) 334:10 lieutenants (1) 449:4 271:7;272:15;276:19; manager (1) 422:12 351:17;352:7,10,15;
lieu (1) 425:23 life (3) 296:12;297:8; 298:18;392:12;395:8,9 manner (3) 319:18; 353:3,13,17;439:1
Lieutenant (286) 300:5 looking (33) 271:8; 330:11;333:9 meets (1) 457:3
269:20;270:11,13,16, likely (2) 333:9;443:19 272:6;297:18;321:3; Manning (2) 334:9,25 members (2) 298:5;
19,22,24;273:20;274:3, limited (1) 359:14 357:3;379:6;383:14; many (4) 283:23; 328:11
14,22;275:8,19; line (45) 273:5,7;292:6; 386:19,25,25;389:2,3; 327:15;386:25;450:16 memo (43) 312:25;
276:20;277:10,13,18; 296:17;357:11,15; 392:7,8,8,9;393:22; March (5) 334:7; 353:6,6,8,14,17;
278:5,9;279:8,11,13, 359:8,11;360:4,12,12, 394:24;395:1,4,6,7,16, 449:18;453:8;456:4; 371:11,13,14,15,19,22;
18,19,25;280:2,10; 15;362:3,5,8,9,21; 17,19;396:3,3,5,8; 460:10 372:1,11,13,14,15,17;
282:2,5,7,22;283:13; 363:12,14,24;366:6; 397:4;406:11,12; Maricopa (5) 304:14; 373:21,24;374:3,6,9,
284:15;294:8,14,16; 367:8;377:14,24; 447:16 310:23;314:17;334:7,9 11,12;434:1,7;435:5;
299:16,23;302:15; 380:19;399:3;400:14, looks (13) 349:11,12; marked (1) 433:22 436:15,16,17,19,19,20,
303:4;305:6,10,13,21, 20;404:22;405:19,24; 384:11;385:2,15,19; Marzocca (5) 312:16, 21,25;437:4,6,14,23;
24;306:3,6,21,25; 407:5;413:17;424:1,2, 386:5,13;389:2; 20;313:10;444:5,8 438:11;441:10;444:4
307:14,24,25;308:2,5, 7,12;426:9,25;427:7; 390:20;391:6,14,20 mascara (1) 285:3 memorandum (2)
9,12,14;309:6,6,17; 428:7;439:21;440:4; Lori (4) 449:21,22; matter (10) 278:11,14; 323:22;372:5
310:9,15;311:2,4,15, 446:1;447:12 450:1,5 302:17;351:15;441:25; memory (4) 306:11,14;
7
7 (6) 321:10;329:6;
366:6;380:18,20;
399:25
7:15 (1) 313:8
74 (5) 357:11,11,15,23;
358:3
8
8 (10) 330:18;356:19;
357:5;369:17,18;
377:13;404:22;405:18;
408:6;445:20
8:00 (3) 448:8,10,13
8:32 (1) 268:3
890 (1) 416:22
898 (1) 416:22
9
9 (12) 331:17;359:23;
369:10,16;407:2,3;
410:8;415:2,3;416:18;
424:24;451:19
9:17 (1) 364:6
91 (3) 363:24;364:21;
440:4
92 (1) 358:13
95 (2) 360:12,16
96 (3) 362:21;363:12,
14
9th (4) 378:6,12;379:3;
456:2