Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DR.P.ANBUOLI
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,
MANNAR THIRUMALAI NAICKER COLLEGE, PASUMALAI, MADURAI – 625004.
EMAIL: anbuolimtnc@gmail.com
Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
The Indian textile industry is as old as the world textile industry. In fact the first
known cotton cultivation seems to be from India. However more and more textile industry
has been push to other states of India are increasingly gaining the attention of the world
textile buyers. The changing global environment raises questions about the ability of small
textile businesses in rural areas to share its potential benefits to the economic growth. Most of
them, lack access to the technologies and market information that would enable them to
comply with quality specifications and effectively respond to emerging opportunities. They
rarely have access to credit and the other financial services necessary to compete in the
modern world. Many face high transportation and input costs that further reduce their ability
to compete. Additionally, there are some whose cultures place greater value on the
maintenance of traditional ways of life, rather than on material success in a competitive
world. Apart from these disadvantages, there is the wider question of whether the economic
and institutional infrastructures, and the structure of policies, are favourable for small
enterprises to succeeding international competition. In short, globalization presents real
dangers to the rural entrepreneur, to set against the possible advantages for the wider
economy.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Santhi & Nagananthini (2014) examined the role and participation of government
agencies and financial institutions in growth and development of women entrepreneurship.
Kumar & Sardar (2011) revealed the symptoms of industrial sickness, also gives the ample
amount of knowledge about the various credit schemes of government. Muthu & Ranga
(2018) examined that entrepreneurs should be provided credit at reasonable interest without
insisting on collateral security in the form of physical assets. Balu (2012) analysed the future
challenges of women entrepreneurs and also had identified certain special factors which need
to be considered for promoting female entrepreneurship. Rathna & Kannan (2018) revealed
the problems of women entrepreneurs such as economic independence, establishing their own
creative idea, establishing their own identity, achievement of excellence, building confidence,
developing risk-taking ability, motivation and equal status in society. Jayadatta (2017)
revealed that enabling the public to think positively, creatively and engaging them
purposefully in entrepreneurship activities is most important for the development of rural
areas. Shivani (2017) showed that a high level of leadership skills with clear understanding of
market, excellent communication skills, maturity to see things in right perspective along with
the ability to take calculated risks are required on the part of the entrepreneur. Singh (2011)
incidence of sickness has been growing in such large proportions that in the wake of
industrial development. Vedanthadesikan & Pathmanathan (2016) revealed that the changing
global environment raises questions about the ability of traditional, small-scale businesses in
rural areas to share the potential benefits offered by the changing environment.
1. To test out the demographic profile of rural entrepreneurs involved in textile business.
2. To investigate the knowledge level of rural entrepreneurs on textile business.
3. To examine the existence of various prospects to textile based rural entrepreneurship.
4. To analyse the impact of resource availability on business performance of rural
entrepreneurs.
4. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The study aimed to analyse the knowledge level, prospects and business performance
of rural textile entrepreneurship. This study is carried out in the rural areas of Madurai district
of Tamil Nadu. Population is rural entrepreneurs involved in textile business, 100
entrepreneurs have been identified at different parts of the district. Field survey through
questionnaire is administered to collect data. This study is formulated on the premise of
descriptive design. Probability sampling technique, especially simple random sampling is
used for collection of data. The survey instrument is prepared with four parts, that is first part
deals with demographic profile, second part collect knowledge level of rural entrepreneurs,
third part covers existence of various prospects, and fourth part focus on resource availability
on business performance. Prior to data collection, a pilot test was conducted to ensure
comprehensiveness, clarity and reliability of the questionnaire. The study considered 20 rural
entrepreneurs so as to perform pilot study. Statistical tools used for analysis includes simple
percentage, chi-square test, descriptive analysis, factor analysis and regression to sum up the
data collected. In the survey instrument, the scale 1 to 5 have been developed, where 5 for
strongly disagree and 1 stands for strongly agree.
entrepreneur’s knowledge is varied as per the nature of business activity. It is concluded that
rural textile entrepreneurs knowledge on business varied based on the quantum of work,
investment, and operational method.
Rural entrepreneurs involved in textile business have various prospects to carry out
their business. Therefore, various prospects favouring rural textile entrepreneurship is
examined. This study aimed to analyze the different prospects and its impact on success of
rural entrepreneurs. This study used t-test to evaluate the computed mean value based on the
opinion on rural entrepreneurs. In this t-test the computed mean value of the rural
entrepreneurs is compared with hypothesized mean value 3 to get the significance value.
Consequently, its results are presented in table-3.
Table-3 shows that the mean value of prospects for rural textile entrepreneur ranges
from 2.45 to 4.34. In particular, it is identified that the variable such as sufficient raw material
supply, easy marketability, government support, financial support, family support, protective
measures, high income potential, power supply, and resource accessibility with its mean
values are strictly greater than 3. It is found that the rural entrepreneurs are strongly agreed
the t-values are greater than ‘3’ that is, 14.75, 10.89, 24.25, 31.27 18.12, 14.62, 18.26 and
17.53 which are statistically significant at 5% level. The rural entrepreneurs are disagreed
about low cost technology usage, better growth potential, bridge finance from banks, and low
risk in business and the t-values are -15.26, -16.32, -15.82 and -13.15. Therefore it could be
concluded that the prospects are highly favourable to the rural textile entrepreneurs.
Financial Support
Personal Ability
Table-4 shows the KMO measure of sampling adequacy. The analysis confirms that
the factor analysis data is appropriate with the value of 0.815, which is suitable of factor
analysis. Bartlett’s test has been executed and its result allocates an extremely significant
result with p=0.000 (p<0.001) and consequently factor analysis result is correct.
Table-5 reveals the results of rotated matrix; it presents that all antecedents of
resource availability, such as financial support, marketing support, operational efficiency, and
personal ability can be accepted with characteristics essential for restructure and
condensation. The first factor is loaded with five factors; it deals with working capital, rate of
interest, knowledge on finance, finance accessibility and plough back of profit. The second
factor deals with market stability, global market support, easy marketing and government
restrictions. The third factor consists of three factors, like use of technology, production
capacity, and trained employees. The fourth factor deals with involvement, risk taking
capacity, and passion to develop. This condensation is possible since the characteristics are
associated. The score given to any one attribute is partly the result of the effect of other
attributes.
Table-7 shows the Anova results, it confirms that the four antecedents of resource
availability are not all equal to each other and could be used to estimate the dependent
variable, business performance as is authorized by F value of 73.256 and strong significance
level of 0.000 (p<0.05).
Table-8 divulges the results of all variables are significant (p<0.001) with high beta
(0.344, 0.281, 0.356 and 0.251) and t-values (5.573, 5.743, 4.428 and 4.923). The VIF value
of less than 10 is found for all variables. It directly substantiated the problem of multi-
collinearly have not subsisted and all data are mutually exclusive. The results showed that
financial support, marketing support, operational efficiency, and personal ability have
significant impact on business performance. It is actually confirmed by examining the t-
statistic for all the independent variables such as, financial support, marketing support,
operational efficiency, and personal ability have significant relationship on account of strong
significant level (p<0.05) with business performance, indicating that the null hypotheses are
incorrect and can be rejected. Hence, there is significant difference between resource
availability and business performance.
References