Basically, sustainable development is a long-term solution to how we plan our
indefinite progress in the future without causing damage to the environment so as to guarantee a safe habitat for the next generations, who will continue to develop their economies, societies, and care for the environment with a similar ideal in mind. It satisfies our needs without sabotaging the opportunities of others. The concept covers a broad scope of matters such as environmental, social, and economic development which continues to prove its importance in our lives as it affects all aspects of them. UN Sustainable Development Goals During the UN Sustainable Development Summit of September 2015, which took place in New York, the Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development was adopted by the 193 countries belonging to the UN General Assembly and clearly outlined 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 targets which are associated to them. They tackle social, economic, personal, physical and environmental issues which, again, emphasizes the all- encompassing nature of sustainable development. These goals proposed by the UN have come under scrutiny, however, for two main, quite different, reasons. Ruth Kattumuri of the LSE Asia Research Centre & India Observatory has criticized the goals for not putting enough emphasis on social issues, whilst the goals regarding economic and environmental security are extensively covered. She also states that the UN undermines the gravity of the problem of human trafficking which is estimated to be a $32 billion industry which exploits and violates the human rights of hundreds of thousands of men, women, and children each year. Child abuse is another problem that the SDG’s set out by the UN fail to tackle. On the other side, many argue that the sustainable development goals cover too broad an area of issues and should be more focused if they are to be achieved over the next twelve years. Some targets could also be said to be rather idealistic, such as the first target – No Poverty. Jonathan Tanner of the Guardian went as far as to say: “We’re going to have to pretty much end violent conflict, experience a Damascene climate conversion, sustain high rates of economic growth, avoid any recession in poor countries and make sure nobody who is disabled or seriously ill sees their income drop to less than $1.25 a day.” There is a lot of truth to what Mr. Tanner wrote, however, some of the SDG’s out to be taken with a pinch of salt and be treated as ideals which we aim to achieve. They may not necessarily be fully achievable due to the nature of humans, nevertheless, the closer we get to them, the better. In short, the SDG’s set out by the UN in 2015 are, indeed, very good guidelines, however, their achievability may not be feasible in our current environment of violence, corruption and wide gaps in the wealth of developed and less developed countries. We should only hope that we come to a day when they will stop being guidelines and become our reality. Challenge in sustainable development in Vietnam 1. Environment pollution Vietnam is facing big challenges in terms of environmental pollution caused by natural agents and anthropogenic activities. Environmental pollution in Vietnam is present in air, water and soil environments in many areas with contaminants including total suspended particles (TSP), organic substances, heavy metals, nutrients including ammonium, phosphate exceeding the allowable values of national standard. One of the most important causes of environmental pollution is the legal powers of environmental protection organizations, especially the environmental police force, not strong enough. In addition, the awareness of the people about environmental protection is very weak. Improving the system of laws on environmental protection, including sanctions that are strong enough to prevent violations, is of the most importance to enhance the effectiveness of environmental management and protection in Vietnam. On the other hand, educating people and even school children about environmental protection is a very meaningful activity to reduce the pressures and challenges of environmental management and protection in Vietnam. 2. Social inequality According to new data, Vietnam’s richest citizens can earn roughly 5,000 times more money in an hour than the poorest Vietnamese spend in a day. The data, revealed on Thursday at an event held by Oxfam Vietnam in Ha Noi, shows how big the inequality gap between the richest and poorest has become in the country. The report, compiled by Oxfam’s Nguyen Tran Lam and his colleagues, said the richest man in Vietnam earns in a day more than the poorest Vietnamese earn in 10 years. His wealth is so huge that he could spend US$1 million every day for six years before exhausting it. In 2014, there were 210 super-rich individuals (each owned property valued over $30 million), and their combined wealth was around $20 billion, equal to 12 per cent of the country’s GDP and a half of HCM City’s GDP. The number of the super-rich individuals is predicted to reach 403 by 2025, under London firm’s Knight Frank’s estimation. Reasons for the inequality include economic development and ineffective use of funds to reduce poverty, participants at the event said. Impacts of inequalities According to the report, economic inequality has triggered inequalities of voice and opportunity. The Country Director of Oxfam in Vietnam, said the inequality has made ethnic minorities, small-scale farmers, migrant workers and women more likely to be poor, more likely to suffer the most from discrimination and more likely to be unable to access to public services or participate in decision- making processes. There are significant disparities between ethnic groups. The Kinh majority has tended to have higher living standards than others. Other ethnic groups only account for 15 per cent of the country’s population but make for 70 per cent of the country’s extremely poor. Unequal access to health service is also holding back disadvantaged groups. For example, pregnant women from poor households are three times more likely to go without antenatal care compared to other pregnant women. Research from the report also showed that disadvantaged citizens lack information and skills to understand tax processes, budget issues and other economic decisions.