Table 1. Length of leaves at 15 days.

TREATMENT REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN

I II III
T1 ORDINARY 5.77 4.43 3.93 14.13 4.71
GARDEN SOIL
T2 1\4 Sandy soil, 5.17 4.73 2.87 12.77 4.26
3\4 loam soil
T3 1\2 ordinary 4.1 3.6 3.4 11.1 3.7
garden soil,1\2
sandy soil
TOTAL 15.04 12.76 10.2 38 4.22

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF VARIATION df SS MS F- 5% TAB 1%
VALUE
Replication 2 3.91 1.96 2.66 6.94 18.00
Treatment 2 1.54 0.77
Error 4 1.14 0.29

TOTAL 81 6.59
 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Table I. Length of leaves at 15 days

The table 1 shows the number of leaves taken 15 days after transplanting as
affected by the application of different soil media.
Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences among treatment tested.

Numerically, plants in ordinary garden soil (T1) obtained highest length of leaves with a

mean of 4.71, Followed by plants applied with 1\4 of Sandy soil and 3\4 of loam soil (T2)

with a mean of 4.2. The lowest length of leaves was observed in plants applied with 1\2 of

ordinary garden soil and 1\2 of sandy soil (73) with a mean of 3.7 respectively.
Table II. Length of leaves at 75 days.

TREATMENT REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN

I II III
T1 ORDINARY 20.37 18.17 20.33 59.27 19.76
GARDEN SOIL
T2 1\4 Sandy soil, 21.2 18.03 19.3 58.53 19.51
3\4 loam soil
T3 1\2 ordinary 15.47 14.83 18.6 48.9 16.3
garden soil,1\2
sandy soil
TOTAL 57.04 50.93 58.73 166.7 18.52

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF VARIATION df SS MS F- 5% TAB 1%
VALUE
Replication 2 11.3 5.62 7.02* 6.94 18.00
Treatment 2 22.32 11.16
Error 4 6.37 1.59

TOTAL 8 39.92
 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Table II Length of leaves at 75 days.

Table II shows the number of leaves at 75 days as affected by the

application of different soil media.

Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences among treatment

tested. Plants in ordinary garden soil (T1) obtained the highest length leaves with a mean of

19.76, followed of 19.51 and the lowest length of leaves was observed in plants applied

with 1\2 of ordinary garden soil and 1\2 of sandy soil (T3) with a mean of 16.3 respectively.
Table III. Width of leaves at 15 days.

TREATMENT REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN

I II III
T1 ORDINARY 2.47 2.13 1.83 6.43 2.14
GARDEN SOIL
T2 1\4 Sandy soil, 2.5 1.9 1.33 5.73 1.91
3\4 loam soil
T3 1\2 ordinary 1.71 1.67 1.23 4.67 1.56
garden soil,1\2
sandy soil
TOTAL 6.74 5.7 4.39 16.83 1.87

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF VARIATION df SS MS F- 5% TAB 1%
VALUE
Replication 2 0.93 0.47 9* 6.94 18.00
Treatment 2 0.53 0.27
Error 4 0.12 0.03

TOTAL 8 1.58
 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Table III. Width of leaves at 15days

The table III shows the width of leaves taken 15 days after transplanting as
affected by the by the application of different soil media for green chili pepper.

Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences among treatment

tested. Plants in ordinary garden soil (T1) obtained the highest length leaves with a mean of

2.4, followed by plants applied with 1\4 of sandy soil and 3\4 of loam soil (T2) with a mean

of 1.91 and the smallest width of leaves observed in plants applied 1\2 of ordinary garden

soil and 1\2 of sandy soil (T3) with a mean of 1.56 respectively.
Table IV. Width of leaves at 75 days.

TREATMENT REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN

I II III
T1 ORDINARY 11.57 10.33 11.1 33 11
GARDEN SOIL
T2 1\4 Sandy soil, 10.87 10.53 11.17 32.57 10.86
3\4 loam soil
T3 1\2 ordinary 10.27 10.43 10.5 31.2 10.4
garden soil,1\2
sandy soil
TOTAL 32.71 31.29 32.77 96.77 10.75

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF df SS MS F- 5% TAB
VARIATION VALUE 1%
Replication 2 0.47 0.24 2.14ns 6.94 18.00
Treatment 2 0.59 0.30
Error 4 0.55 0.14

TOTAL 8 1.61
 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Table IV. Width of leaves at 75 days.

The table IV shows the width of the leaves at 75 days as affected by the
application of different soil media for green chili pepper.

Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference among treatment

tested. Numerically, plants in ordinary garden soil (T1) obtained larger width of leaves with

a mean of 11, followed by plants applied width 1\4 of sandy soil and 3\4 of loam soil (T2)

with a mean of 10.86 and the smallest width of leaves was observed in plants applied with

1\2 of ordinary garden soil and 1\2 of sandy soil (T3) with a mean of 10.4 respectively.

.
Table V. Plant height at 15 days

TREATMENT REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN

I II III
T1 ORDINARY 15.3 13.03 10.27 38.6 12.87
GARDEN SOIL
T2 1\4 Sandy soil, 13.53 13.4 8.37 35.3 11.77
3\4 loam soil
T3 1\2 ordinary 12.71 9.87 9.77 32.41 10.80
garden soil,1\2
sandy soil
TOTAL 41.6 36.3 28.41 106.31 11.81

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF VARIATION df SS MS F- 5% TAB 1%
VALUE
Replication 2 29.37 14.69 1.99ns 6.94 18.00
Treatment 2 6.39 3.20
Error 4 6.44 1.61

TOTAL 8 42.20
 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Table V. Plant height at 15 days.

The table V shows the plant height taken 15 days after transplanting as

affected by the application of different soil media for green chili pepper.

Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences among treatment

tested numerically, plants in ordinary garden soil (T1) obtained the highest plant height

width a mean of 12.87, followed by plants applied with 1\4 of sandy soil and 3\4 of loam soil

(T2) with a mean of 11.77 and the lowest plant height observed in plants applied with 1\2 of

ordinary garden soil and 1\2 sandy soil (T3) with a mean of 10.80 respectively.
Table VI. Plant height at 75 days.

TREATMENT REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN

I II III
T1 ORDINARY 57.2 58.77 55.37 171.34 57.11
GARDEN SOIL
T2 1\4 Sandy soil, 57.47 48.63 47.4 153.5 51.17
3\4 loam soil
T3 1\2 ordinary 54.9 47.3 44.9 147.1 49.03
garden soil,1\2
sandy soil
TOTAL 169.57 154.6 147.67 471.94 52.44

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF VARIATION Df SS MS F- 5% TAB 1%
VALUE
Replication 2 83.35 41.68 6.54ns 6.94 18.00
Treatment 2 105.21 52.61
Error 4 37.3 9.33

TOTAL 8 225.86
 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Table VI. Plant height at 75 days.

The table VI shows the plant height at 75 days as affected by the

application of different soil media for green chili pepper.

Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference among treatment

tested. Numerically, plants in ordinary garden soil (T1) obtained the highest plant height

with a mean of 57.11, followed by plants applied width 1\4 of sandy soil and 3\4 of loam soil

(T2) with a mean of 5.17 and the lowest plant height was observed in plants applied with

1\2 of ordinary garden soil and 1\2 of sandy soil (T3) with a mean of 49.03 respectively.
Table VII. Number of leaves at 20 days.

TREATMENT REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN

I II III
T1 ORDINARY 12.33 9 7.67 29 9.67
GARDEN SOIL
T2 1\4 Sandy soil, 14.33 10.67 6.33 31.33 10.44
3\4 loam soil
T3 1\2 ordinary 7.67 6 4.67 18.34 6.11
garden soil,1\2
sandy soil
TOTAL 34.33 25.67 18.67 78.67 8.74

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF VARIATION df SS MS F- 5% TAB 1%
VALUE
Replication 2 41.03 20.52 9.03* 6.94 18.00
Treatment 2 31.98 15.99
Error 4 7.09 1.77

TOTAL 8 80.10
 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Table VII. Number of leaves at 20 days.

The table VII shows the number of the leaves taken 20 days after
transplanting as affected by the application of different soil media for green chili pepper.

Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference among treatment

tested. Numerically, plants applied width 1\4 of sandy soil and 3\4 of loam soil (T2) obtained

more number of leaves with a mean of 10.44, followed by plants in ordinary garden soil (T1)

with a mean of 9.67 and the lowest number of leaves was observed in plants applied with

1\2 of ordinary garden soil and 1\2 of sandy soil (T3) with a mean of 6.11 respectively.
Table VIII. Number of leaves at 75 days.

TREATMENT REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN

I II III
T1 ORDINARY 140.67 90 90.1 331.67 110.56
GARDEN SOIL
T2 1\4 Sandy soil, 161.67 119.33 78.67 359.67 119.89
3\4 loam soil
T3 1\2 ordinary 97.33 76.33 91 264.66 88.22
garden soil,1\2
sandy soil
TOTAL 399.67 285.66 270.67 956 106.22

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF VARIATION df SS MS F- 5% TAB 1%
VALUE
Replication 2 3,318.22 1,659.11 1.19ns 6.94 18.00
Treatment 2 1,589.03 529.68
Error 4 1,779.56 444.89

TOTAL 8 6,686.81
 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Table VIII. Number of leaves at 75 days.

The table VIII shows the number of the leaves at 75 days as affected by the
application of different soil media for green chili pepper.

Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference among treatment

tested. Numerically, plants applied width 1\4 of sandy soil and 3\4 of loam soil (T2) obtained

more number of leaves with a mean of 119.89, followed by plants in ordinary garden soil

(T1) with a mean of 110.56 and the lowest number of leaves was observed in plants applied

with 1\2 of ordinary garden soil and 1\2 of sandy soil (T3) with a mean of 88.22 respectively.
Table XI. Weight of fruits at 1st harvest.

TREATMENT REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN

I II III
T1 ORDINARY 40 30 10 80 26.67
GARDEN SOIL
T2 1\4 Sandy soil, 45 20 10 75 25
3\4 loam soil
T3 1\2 ordinary 20 10 10 40 13.33
garden soil,1\2
sandy soil
TOTAL 105 60 30 195 21.67

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF VARIATION df SS MS F- 5% TAB 1%
VALUE
Replication 2 950 475 2.71ns 6.94 18.00
Treatment 2 316.67 158.33
Error 4 233.33 58.33

TOTAL 8 1,500
 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Table IX. Weight of fruits at 1st harvest.

The table IX shows the weight of fruits at 1st harvest as affected by the
application of different soil media for green chili pepper.

Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference among treatment

tested. Numerically, plants in ordinary garden soil (T1) obtained the heaviest weight of fruit

with a mean of 80, followed by plants applied width 1\4 of sandy soil and 3\4 of loam soil

(T2) with a mean of 75 and the light weight of frits was observed in plants applied with 1\2

of ordinary garden soil and 1\2 of sandy soil (T3) with a mean of 40 respectively.
Table X. Weight of fruits at 2nd harvest.

TREATMENT REPLICATION TOTAL MEAN

I II III
T1 ORDINARY 120 130 95 345 115
GARDEN SOIL
T2 1\4 Sandy soil, 145 135 95 375 125
3\4 loam soil
T3 1\2 ordinary 100 110 90 300 100
garden soil,1\2
sandy soil
TOTAL 365 375 280 1,020 113.33

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE OF VARIATION df SS MS F- 5% TAB 1%
VALUE
Replication 2 1,816.67 908.34 4.38ns 6.94 18.00
Treatment 2 950 475
Error 4 433.33 108.33

TOTAL 8 3,200
 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Table X. Weight of fruits at 2nd harvest.

The table X shows the weight of fruits at 1st harvest as affected by the
application of different soil media for green chili pepper.

Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference among treatment

tested. Numerically, plants applied with 1\4 sandy soil and 3\4 loam soil (T2) obtained the

heaviest weight of fruits with a mean of 375, followed by plants with ordinary garden soil

(T1) with a mean of 345 and the light weight of fruits was observed in plants applied with

1\2 ordinary garden soil and 1\2 sandy soil (T3) with a mean of 300 respectively.